15.06.2015 Views

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

Final_Judgment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[224] <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Judgment</strong> 285<br />

Assassination researcher Bernard Fensterwald reported in 1977 that,<br />

"Angleton had handled several controversial CIA matters relating to the<br />

assassination, such as the mysterious series of CIA photographs taken in<br />

Mexico City in September and October, 1963, in which a man identified by<br />

the CIA as Lee Harvey Oswald turned out not to be Oswald at all." 601<br />

What's more, as pointed out by Peter Dale Scott, a report by the House<br />

Assassinations Committee "established that, on the death of Win Scott, the<br />

by-then retired Mexico City station chief who had sent out the Kostikov<br />

cable, CIA counterintelligence chief Angleton flew immediately to Mexico<br />

City, retrieved a photograph of 'Oswald' from the family safe, and destroyed<br />

it . . . .” 602<br />

What is particularly interesting, in light of all that we have seen in<br />

relation to Angleton's ties to the Mossad, Scott adds further: "Angleton may<br />

have undertaken this mission on behalf of the agency. Another possibility is<br />

that he undertook it on behalf of a cabal within the government who had<br />

conspired to create the `Oswald'-Kostikov story." 603<br />

The Mexico City-Oswald scenario was clearly part of the groundwork for<br />

the ultimate framing of Lee Harvey Oswald as a communist sympathizer—<br />

perhaps even a KGB operative—who had killed the American president.<br />

And in light of the mysterious appearance of the "Dear Mr. Hunt" letter<br />

(ostensibly from Lee Harvey Oswald) mailed from Mexico City, we can<br />

only speculate as to whether Angleton himself may have been the<br />

mastermind behind the leak of that hitherto unknown document as well.<br />

Was the "Dear Mr. Hunt" letter also part of Angleton's tangled web of<br />

intrigue?<br />

It was Angleton who was so determined to bury any evidence that<br />

proved that Oswald was not, in fact, a KGB operative (as we have already<br />

seen in Chapter 8.)<br />

It was Angleton who most vociferously accused Soviet defector Yuri<br />

Nosenko of being a KGB plant. Nosenko had come to the United States<br />

following the JFK assassination and claimed insistently that Oswald had not<br />

worked for the Soviet KGB, that the KGB had vetoed any idea of attempting<br />

to recruit Oswald after the young American had "defected" to the USSR<br />

(whether Oswald's "defection" was genuine or not).<br />

The story told by Nosenko disproved Angleton's thesis entirely—which<br />

perhaps explains why Angleton dealt so harshly with Nosenko. That<br />

Trento's story—leaking the Angleton memo on Hunt—would incorporate a<br />

major portion of Angleton's JFK cover story is interesting, to say the least.<br />

WHAT MOTIVATED ANGLETON?<br />

Pointing toward the intra-CIA turmoil which, in fact, had resulted in<br />

Angleton's ouster from the CIA, is the interesting suggestion in Trento's<br />

story that sources within the CIA had suggested that Angleton was<br />

suspected by some of being a KGB mole.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!