Connotations 18.1-3 (2008/2009)
Connotations 18.1-3 (2008/2009)
Connotations 18.1-3 (2008/2009)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Secrets Not Revealed: Possible Stories in The Woman in White<br />
larity, order and control to be simultaneously inhabited by a subsidiary<br />
world of irregularity, disorder, madness and doubt.<br />
As a consequence, the established framework of Walter’s worldpicture<br />
becomes increasingly shaken, as he subsequently embarks on<br />
his new job as drawing-master at Limmeridge house, causing his<br />
narrative imagination to grow almost as hazy as the water-colour<br />
portrait by means of which he attempts to re-create the first “vivid<br />
impression produced” on him “by the charm” of Laura Fairlie’s “fair<br />
face and head, her sweet expression” (42) and, above all, her “lovely<br />
eyes” with their “clear truthfulness of look” that evokes nothing less<br />
than the ideal “light of a purer and a better world” (41). Symptomatically,<br />
in Walter’s perception, Laura’s “fair, delicate” demeanour (41)<br />
with her “faint and pale” coloured hair and her “truthful innocent<br />
blue eyes” is suffused with something remarkably enigmatic. The eyes<br />
shed a “charm—most gently and yet most distinctly expressed” over<br />
her “whole face” that “so covers and transforms its little natural human<br />
blemishes elsewhere, that it is difficult to estimate the relative<br />
merits and defects of the other features” (41). As a description this<br />
remains notably nondescript: the individual characteristics of Laura’s<br />
figure seem to be veiled by a vague allure that is effectively not characterised,<br />
and the “relative merits and defects” of her “features” are<br />
covered and transformed by something that does, by itself, not feature<br />
among them. The fineness and beauty of Laura, it seems, is inextricably<br />
linked to a tendency of letting her disappear; for the vivid account<br />
of her presence is overshadowed by an unaccountable manifestation<br />
of absence, a dislocating “sensation” of a sense not located (“out of<br />
place”) (42), ultimately suggesting no more than the bewildering<br />
“idea of something wanting” (42), but evidently not there. “At one<br />
time it seemed like something wanting in her; at another, like something<br />
wanting in myself, which hindered me from understanding her<br />
as I ought” (42). Paradoxically, then, Laura’s character contains a<br />
component that it does not contain and yet unavoidably seems to call<br />
up. “Something wanting, something wanting—and where it was and<br />
what it was I could not say” (42). This obvious lack in Laura’s appear-<br />
65