17.11.2012 Views

Connotations 18.1-3 (2008/2009)

Connotations 18.1-3 (2008/2009)

Connotations 18.1-3 (2008/2009)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(Un)Surprises Uncovered<br />

Alice is surprised, and she is so surprised that she forgets how to<br />

speak good English—she is not surprised “at what she can utter<br />

beyond and against the rules of language” (284); this is only a<br />

consequence of her surprise. What she is doing here is rather typical of<br />

a child much younger than Alice: she follows linguistic rules<br />

rigorously. The regular comparative of adjectives in English is formed<br />

by adding the suffix –er to the adjective: big—bigger, large—larger,<br />

nice—nicer. In analogy to that, Alice invents the form curious—<br />

curiouser—and shortly afterwards realizes that she is talking<br />

“nonsense” (17). She learns through play: she follows a linguistic rule<br />

(not unlike a foreign learner) but then recognises that this is not the<br />

correct form. In this situation, Alice is far from “establish[ing] her<br />

personality and becom[ing] a subject” (284); she is interacting with<br />

herself.<br />

Alice’s Interaction(s)<br />

I appreciate Jennifer Geer’s reading of surprises in the Alice-books and<br />

how she addresses the “question of what is natural.” She finds that<br />

there are “different definitions of nature”:<br />

221<br />

Alice’s working definition of the natural as something that is ‘part of the<br />

world she is accustomed to’ ties it to her cultural and social experience as an<br />

upper-middle-class Victorian girl. For her, a natural situation is one that<br />

conforms to some aspect of this experience. On the other hand […] Alice is<br />

able to accept the fantastic because she is a child […]. This argument rests on<br />

a conception of nature that is far more essentialist than Alice’s working definition;<br />

it assumes that children have an affinity for the fantastic that is independent<br />

of social and cultural variations. Technically speaking, this is a<br />

contradiction in Zirker’s argument, but it reflects the books’ own shifting definitions<br />

of what is natural. (Geer 271-72)<br />

Geer seems to see a contradiction in my reading of the term natural:<br />

firstly, ‘natural’ refers to what corresponds with Alice’s experience,<br />

i.e. what she knows and has seen or experienced before; secondly, it<br />

can also refer to what is fantastic as the fantastic is part of the child’s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!