Connotations 18.1-3 (2008/2009)
Connotations 18.1-3 (2008/2009) Connotations 18.1-3 (2008/2009)
196 MAIK GOTH the ability to look into the future, and to create with premeditation, a quality that is also emphasised by his ponderous melancholy. Phantastes’s creative ability connects readily with Prometheus’s nature, because his name (Greek Προ-μήθευς) defines him through his ability to “fore-think.” 60 It is exactly the ability of “forethought” in both Phantastes and Prometheus that stresses deliberation as the defining quality of fashioning, and characterises poetic creation—even that of monstrous or human composites—as intentional. This correlation between the names and natures of Prometheus and Phantastes are hardly coincidental in a work where names form such complex patterns of meaning, and which draws so heavily on contemporary poetical issues. 61 As fantasy has access to memory and can create new combinations from what it has stored, Good Memory (Eumnestes) is the decisive tool for the visualisation of new beings, since this faculty provides the matter, or raw material for creating these new combinations from physical and textual data. Making poetry is therefore an act of creation based on the combination and animation of physical and textual material, which—to use the central term from Spenser’s Prometheus myth—is “deryu’d” from memory, a process which is at work in Spenser’s The Faerie Queene, and parallels Prometheus’s fashioning Elfe from the parts of animals. 62 In the context of this theory, the poet is not merely the vessel of divine inspiration; rather, he emerges as a Promethean maker in his own right. It thus becomes apparent that Spenser’s fashioning, literally com-posing a poem, full of extraordinary characters, strange bodies, and topographical details, is just as much an act of making as Prometheus’s fashioning Elfe: Prometheus, like Spenser, is a poet in the etymological sense of the word. 63 In the words of Theseus in Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, one could say that both Prometheus and Spenser indulge in “bod[ying] forth […] things unknown” by giving shape to their “airy nothing[s],” i.e. their very own ideas and imaginings. 64 Like Prometheus, Spenser gives these beings names; the poet, however, transcends the god by designing for them a “local habitation,” namely Faeryland and its
Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrous and the Idea of Poetic Creation adjacent textual realms, which is very much a compound of topographical referents, animated within the confines of his poem. In his treatment of the Prometheus myth, Spenser hence reflects on his own critical awareness of the poet as a maker who brings to life a second nature in which he also places different types of new monsters as defining and consciously fashioned parts of his “rich tapestry.” 6. Concluding Remarks Prometheus’s alleged deeds have earned him various epithets. On the one hand, the theft of fire and the creation of Man marked him as an antagonist of the gods, and stigmatised him as a lawbreaker driven by excessive vanity and curiosity. 65 The myth also lent itself to positive allegorical readings, turning Prometheus into the hero of civilisation, as the bringer of culture, i.e. of philosophy, letters and learning, 66 characteristics that are in no small part influenced by the etymology of his name. In his Genealogie deorum, Boccaccio stresses the necessity to read myths allegorically, and sets up the concept of the “duplex Prometheus”: while the first is the syncretistic cipher for God, the maker of man, the second is a wise teacher that turns ignorant, and unruly men into a civilised people. As Prometheus’s educational programme is basically a second creation that turns human beings from physical into cultural beings, Man likewise has a “double nature.” 67 In a recent article, Susanna Barsella interprets Boccaccio’s use of the Prometheus myth as a strategy to reclaim for himself “the lofty role of ‘civilizator.’” 68 In a more critical move, Spenser, who acknowledges the tension between the poet’s creativity and its dangers throughout his work (in figures like Bonfont/Malfont, and Archimago), emphasises that the poet must act transgressively by creating something new and living from disparate parts in order to create a work that likewise helps civilise, i.e. fashion “a gentleman or noble person in vertuous and gentle discipline.” 69 This observation renders more profound the conceptual link between the creator of Elfe and the maker of The Faerie 197
- Page 151 and 152: Joe Orton’s Laodicean Tragedy: Th
- Page 153 and 154: Joe Orton’s Laodicean Tragedy: Th
- Page 155 and 156: Joe Orton’s Laodicean Tragedy: Th
- Page 157 and 158: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 159 and 160: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 161 and 162: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 163 and 164: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 165 and 166: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 167 and 168: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 169 and 170: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 171 and 172: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 173 and 174: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 175 and 176: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 177 and 178: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 179 and 180: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 181 and 182: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 183 and 184: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 185 and 186: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 187 and 188: Pynchon Takes the Fork in the Road
- Page 189 and 190: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 191 and 192: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 193 and 194: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 195 and 196: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 197 and 198: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 199 and 200: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 201: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 205 and 206: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 207 and 208: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 209 and 210: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 211 and 212: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 213 and 214: Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrou
- Page 215 and 216: Dickens and the Comic Extraneous tw
- Page 217 and 218: Dickens and the Comic Extraneous Th
- Page 219 and 220: Dickens and the Comic Extraneous Li
- Page 221 and 222: (Un)Surprises Uncovered: A Reply to
- Page 223 and 224: (Un)Surprises Uncovered longing and
- Page 225 and 226: (Un)Surprises Uncovered What is mor
- Page 227 and 228: (Un)Surprises Uncovered Alice is su
- Page 229 and 230: (Un)Surprises Uncovered supposed to
- Page 231 and 232: (Un)Surprises Uncovered [grammatica
- Page 233 and 234: (Un)Surprises Uncovered 9 See, e.g.
- Page 235 and 236: (Un)Surprises Uncovered Rose, Jacqu
- Page 237 and 238: Ambiguity and the Poets bologies,/
- Page 239 and 240: Ambiguity and the Poets For me, the
- Page 241 and 242: Ambiguity and the Poets take the se
- Page 243 and 244: Ambiguity and the Poets […]. It i
- Page 245 and 246: Ambiguity and the Poets apparently
- Page 247 and 248: Ambiguity and the Poets with the fe
- Page 249 and 250: Ambiguity and the Poets NOTES 1 Quo
- Page 251 and 252: Ambiguity and the Poets Ovid [Publi
Spenser as Prometheus: The Monstrous and the Idea of Poetic Creation<br />
adjacent textual realms, which is very much a compound of topographical<br />
referents, animated within the confines of his poem. In his<br />
treatment of the Prometheus myth, Spenser hence reflects on his own<br />
critical awareness of the poet as a maker who brings to life a second<br />
nature in which he also places different types of new monsters as<br />
defining and consciously fashioned parts of his “rich tapestry.”<br />
6. Concluding Remarks<br />
Prometheus’s alleged deeds have earned him various epithets. On the<br />
one hand, the theft of fire and the creation of Man marked him as an<br />
antagonist of the gods, and stigmatised him as a lawbreaker driven by<br />
excessive vanity and curiosity. 65 The myth also lent itself to positive<br />
allegorical readings, turning Prometheus into the hero of civilisation,<br />
as the bringer of culture, i.e. of philosophy, letters and learning, 66<br />
characteristics that are in no small part influenced by the etymology of<br />
his name. In his Genealogie deorum, Boccaccio stresses the necessity to<br />
read myths allegorically, and sets up the concept of the “duplex Prometheus”:<br />
while the first is the syncretistic cipher for God, the maker<br />
of man, the second is a wise teacher that turns ignorant, and unruly<br />
men into a civilised people. As Prometheus’s educational programme<br />
is basically a second creation that turns human beings from physical<br />
into cultural beings, Man likewise has a “double nature.” 67 In a recent<br />
article, Susanna Barsella interprets Boccaccio’s use of the Prometheus<br />
myth as a strategy to reclaim for himself “the lofty role of ‘civilizator.’”<br />
68 In a more critical move, Spenser, who acknowledges the tension<br />
between the poet’s creativity and its dangers throughout his<br />
work (in figures like Bonfont/Malfont, and Archimago), emphasises<br />
that the poet must act transgressively by creating something new and<br />
living from disparate parts in order to create a work that likewise<br />
helps civilise, i.e. fashion “a gentleman or noble person in vertuous<br />
and gentle discipline.” 69 This observation renders more profound the<br />
conceptual link between the creator of Elfe and the maker of The Faerie<br />
197