Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
educe the negative trends in the health of the<br />
population. Of all health disorders, the population of<br />
<strong>Serbia</strong> is mostly affected by non-infectious diseases:<br />
ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular diseases,<br />
lung cancer, unipolar depressive disorders, and<br />
diabetes mellitus were responsible for almost two<br />
thirds of diseases (70 percent) 7 . Every second<br />
inhabitant in <strong>Serbia</strong> dies each year of cardiovascular<br />
diseases, and every fifth inhabitant dies of<br />
malignant tumours. The two most common causes<br />
of death in <strong>Serbia</strong> have been the same for some time<br />
now, with a tendency toward an increase in <strong>2002</strong><br />
and 2006: diseases of the circulatory system are<br />
becoming a more significant cause of death with 55<br />
percent in <strong>2002</strong> to 57 percent in 2006, and tumours,<br />
as a cause of mortality, with 18 percent in <strong>2002</strong> to<br />
20 percent in 2006 8 .<br />
7.3. State of the Populations Health<br />
One of the significant indicators of the state of<br />
health and quality of life is ones own perception of<br />
health, i.e. subjective health assessment. This does<br />
not accurately reflect the medically measured state<br />
of health, but most frequently correspond to clinical<br />
findings. It includes individual evaluation of<br />
physiological, psychological and social welfare and<br />
the effects that health has on other aspects of life.<br />
In <strong>2007</strong>, 60 percent of the population in <strong>Serbia</strong><br />
assessed their health as good and 19 percent as bad<br />
(Graph 1). If we consider only the population over<br />
15 years 9 (people below the age of 14 typically<br />
assess their health as good and very good) the<br />
percentage of those who assess their health as good,<br />
was 56 percent, and as bad, 22 percent. It can be<br />
seen that only every third inhabitant is in the first<br />
quintile (32 percent), and only every ninth<br />
inhabitant of the richest quintile (12 percent)<br />
assessed their health as bad. The proportion of the<br />
population that assesses their health status as good<br />
increases with economic prosperity whereas the<br />
percentage of inhabitants, who assess their health as<br />
bad, decreases (Graph 2).<br />
Nearly one third of the population in <strong>Serbia</strong><br />
(32 percent) reported that they suffered from a longlasting<br />
disease or a health problem. Women<br />
reported it more frequently than men (36 percent<br />
and 28 percent respectively), and it was particularly<br />
high in those aged over 60 (73 percent). The<br />
frequency of this finding was also higher among<br />
poorer respondents who fell into the first and<br />
second quintile (30 percent and 29 percent).<br />
Health<br />
Graph 7.1. Self-assessment of population health,<br />
<strong>2007</strong><br />
21%<br />
15%<br />
4%<br />
33%<br />
27%<br />
Very good<br />
Good<br />
Fair<br />
Bad<br />
Very bad<br />
Graph 7.2. Self-assessment of population health<br />
reported by 15+ according to expenditure<br />
quintiles<br />
Richest<br />
4<br />
Bad<br />
3<br />
Fair<br />
Good2<br />
Poorest<br />
Total<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />
% population 15+<br />
The most frequently reported chronic diseases<br />
and health problems were increased blood pressure<br />
and heart diseases (16 percent) and 6 percent<br />
reported hand and arm disability (including arthritis<br />
and rheumatism) 10 . Since the frequency of these<br />
diseases increases with age, they are most common<br />
in those aged over 45. For those aged over 60 these<br />
diseases are three to four times more frequent than<br />
compared to the average population. In relation to<br />
individually observed diseases no significant<br />
difference was observed regarding the type of<br />
habitation, geographic region and socio-economic<br />
category.<br />
Four fifths of the population with chronic<br />
diseases (80 percent) used health services. Children<br />
between the ages 0 and 14 years used services<br />
significantly less frequently (only 56 percent) - a<br />
very unfavourable finding. One of the worst<br />
85