14.06.2015 Views

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

If we take a look at the value trends of the<br />

indicator of inequality 9/1 decile against<br />

expenditure, it is possible to identify a certain<br />

decline of the value of this indicator in the five-year<br />

period. In <strong>2002</strong>, the value of this indicator was 4.1,<br />

while in <strong>2007</strong> it amounted to 3.9.<br />

Graph 2.6 represents the distribution of<br />

households per unit of the equivalent scale as<br />

compared with the poverty lines for <strong>2002</strong> and <strong>2007</strong>.<br />

If we view the distribution of population against<br />

total expenditure, the Lorenz Curve shows that there<br />

is no significant inequality of expenditure among<br />

the population.<br />

The value of the Gini coefficient measured<br />

using household expenditure along the equivalence<br />

scale amounts to 29.69. Applying income instead of<br />

expenditure increases inequality by about 8 Gini<br />

points (the Gini coefficient measured using<br />

household income amounts to 37.03), which<br />

contributes to the selection of the expenditure<br />

aggregate as a measure of living standards of the<br />

population, as it has a more balanced distribution.<br />

Таble 2.7. Comparison between the average household expenditure by deciles per expenditure unit,<br />

<strong>2002</strong> – <strong>2007</strong><br />

Average expenditure in dinars<br />

<strong>2002</strong><br />

Average expenditure in dinars<br />

<strong>2007</strong><br />

Total<br />

1<br />

Decile<br />

2<br />

Decile<br />

3<br />

Decile<br />

4<br />

Decile<br />

5<br />

Decile<br />

6<br />

Decile<br />

7<br />

Decile<br />

8<br />

Decile<br />

9<br />

Decile<br />

10<br />

Decile<br />

24 709 8 905 12 674 15 664 17 375 20 132 23 165 26 454 29 402 36 552 53 978<br />

52 843 19 260 27 158 32 337 38 845 43 685 49 283 54 969 63 544 75 030 112 658<br />

Nominal growth in percent 46.8 46.2 46.7 48.4 44.7 46.1 47.0 48.1 46.3 48.7 47.9<br />

Real growth in percent 27.4 27.1 27.4 28.4 26.3 27.0 27.6 28.2 27.2 28.6 28.1<br />

1.0<br />

Graph 2.7. Lorenz Curve for expenditure<br />

График 5.7. Лоренцова крива потрошње<br />

0.8<br />

Cumulative share of expenditure<br />

Кумулативни удео потрошње<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0<br />

Кумулативни удео становништва<br />

Cumulative share of population<br />

40 <strong>Living</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>Measurements</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2002</strong> - <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!