14.06.2015 Views

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Graph 10.16. What would help your household<br />

to live better?<br />

Nonagricultural<br />

employment<br />

Access to<br />

credit lines<br />

Market<br />

organization<br />

(sale,<br />

Information<br />

access<br />

Business<br />

association<br />

Training,<br />

education,<br />

courses<br />

Other<br />

Don't know<br />

and refused<br />

2.2%<br />

4.6%<br />

16.8%<br />

12.9%<br />

12.5%<br />

40.3%<br />

57.4%<br />

10.4. Changes of main social and<br />

economic indicators of<br />

agricultural households<br />

<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>2007</strong><br />

65.9%<br />

From <strong>2002</strong> - <strong>2007</strong> strategies relating to<br />

agricultural incentives changed several times. The<br />

most important elements of the agrarian reform in<br />

<strong>Serbia</strong> since 2000 have been as follows: market<br />

liberalization, privatization of food-processing<br />

industry, the beginning of the formation of new<br />

institutional forms at all levels. Land reprivatization,<br />

unlike other countries in transition,<br />

did not have significant consequences on the<br />

agrarian structure considering high share of private<br />

farms in the total agricultural resources even before<br />

transition.<br />

However, many years of overlapping<br />

jurisdiction from republic and federal institutions<br />

has slowed down significant changes in the sector<br />

operations. The majority of jurisdictions relating to<br />

the agricultural sector were not transferred to the<br />

Government of the Republic of <strong>Serbia</strong> until early<br />

2003. Strategic and program commitments of the<br />

reform governments have been changed (partly) due<br />

to objective changes in the overall macroeconomic<br />

environment. Therefore, there is still lack of clearly<br />

defined development strategy and mechanisms for<br />

implementation. Therefore efficiency, as well as<br />

overall results of the sector, is below the expected<br />

and achievable level. Generally speaking, in past<br />

five years agrarian policy reform in <strong>Serbia</strong> has<br />

undertaken the following directions (Božić D.,<br />

Bogdanov N. 2006):<br />

• Funds from the agrarian budget have been<br />

increased while their share in the total budget<br />

has remained at almost the same level;<br />

• Implementation mechanisms have been<br />

redirected from income support to investment<br />

incentives;<br />

• A key system change regards the implementation<br />

of state support, in that only registered farmers<br />

are allowed to receive it since 2004;<br />

• Significant diversification of supporting<br />

measures to agriculture and rural areas is<br />

performed.<br />

Changes in the organizational and economic<br />

characteristics of the agricultural households in past<br />

five years indicate the following (Table 5):<br />

1. The number of agricultural farms is decreasing,<br />

followed by their polarization by size.<br />

2. The average size of agricultural land possessed<br />

by farms is reduced to 4.34 hectares (by 6<br />

percent compared to <strong>2002</strong>), but the land used per<br />

farm has grown to almost 5 hectares. These<br />

figures indicate relatively dynamic land market<br />

compared to the <strong>2002</strong> situation.<br />

3. The number of farms that own livestock is<br />

reduced, but the average number of head per<br />

farm has grown.<br />

4. The quantity of machinery and equipment has<br />

grown, partly owing to support from the<br />

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water<br />

Management aimed at purchasing agricultural<br />

machinery and partly to a more developed<br />

financial capital market.<br />

5. The share of food expenses of agricultural<br />

households in relation to total expenses has<br />

dropped as well as own production food<br />

consumption, which are measures of the better<br />

standard of living compared to five years ago.<br />

6. The number of farms with income from the sale<br />

of agricultural products is dropping, indicating<br />

household income specialization and their<br />

polarization according to income sources within<br />

the agricultural and off-farm activities.<br />

148 <strong>Living</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>Measurements</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2002</strong> - <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!