Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Graph 10.16. What would help your household<br />
to live better?<br />
Nonagricultural<br />
employment<br />
Access to<br />
credit lines<br />
Market<br />
organization<br />
(sale,<br />
Information<br />
access<br />
Business<br />
association<br />
Training,<br />
education,<br />
courses<br />
Other<br />
Don't know<br />
and refused<br />
2.2%<br />
4.6%<br />
16.8%<br />
12.9%<br />
12.5%<br />
40.3%<br />
57.4%<br />
10.4. Changes of main social and<br />
economic indicators of<br />
agricultural households<br />
<strong>2002</strong>-<strong>2007</strong><br />
65.9%<br />
From <strong>2002</strong> - <strong>2007</strong> strategies relating to<br />
agricultural incentives changed several times. The<br />
most important elements of the agrarian reform in<br />
<strong>Serbia</strong> since 2000 have been as follows: market<br />
liberalization, privatization of food-processing<br />
industry, the beginning of the formation of new<br />
institutional forms at all levels. Land reprivatization,<br />
unlike other countries in transition,<br />
did not have significant consequences on the<br />
agrarian structure considering high share of private<br />
farms in the total agricultural resources even before<br />
transition.<br />
However, many years of overlapping<br />
jurisdiction from republic and federal institutions<br />
has slowed down significant changes in the sector<br />
operations. The majority of jurisdictions relating to<br />
the agricultural sector were not transferred to the<br />
Government of the Republic of <strong>Serbia</strong> until early<br />
2003. Strategic and program commitments of the<br />
reform governments have been changed (partly) due<br />
to objective changes in the overall macroeconomic<br />
environment. Therefore, there is still lack of clearly<br />
defined development strategy and mechanisms for<br />
implementation. Therefore efficiency, as well as<br />
overall results of the sector, is below the expected<br />
and achievable level. Generally speaking, in past<br />
five years agrarian policy reform in <strong>Serbia</strong> has<br />
undertaken the following directions (Božić D.,<br />
Bogdanov N. 2006):<br />
• Funds from the agrarian budget have been<br />
increased while their share in the total budget<br />
has remained at almost the same level;<br />
• Implementation mechanisms have been<br />
redirected from income support to investment<br />
incentives;<br />
• A key system change regards the implementation<br />
of state support, in that only registered farmers<br />
are allowed to receive it since 2004;<br />
• Significant diversification of supporting<br />
measures to agriculture and rural areas is<br />
performed.<br />
Changes in the organizational and economic<br />
characteristics of the agricultural households in past<br />
five years indicate the following (Table 5):<br />
1. The number of agricultural farms is decreasing,<br />
followed by their polarization by size.<br />
2. The average size of agricultural land possessed<br />
by farms is reduced to 4.34 hectares (by 6<br />
percent compared to <strong>2002</strong>), but the land used per<br />
farm has grown to almost 5 hectares. These<br />
figures indicate relatively dynamic land market<br />
compared to the <strong>2002</strong> situation.<br />
3. The number of farms that own livestock is<br />
reduced, but the average number of head per<br />
farm has grown.<br />
4. The quantity of machinery and equipment has<br />
grown, partly owing to support from the<br />
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water<br />
Management aimed at purchasing agricultural<br />
machinery and partly to a more developed<br />
financial capital market.<br />
5. The share of food expenses of agricultural<br />
households in relation to total expenses has<br />
dropped as well as own production food<br />
consumption, which are measures of the better<br />
standard of living compared to five years ago.<br />
6. The number of farms with income from the sale<br />
of agricultural products is dropping, indicating<br />
household income specialization and their<br />
polarization according to income sources within<br />
the agricultural and off-farm activities.<br />
148 <strong>Living</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>Measurements</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2002</strong> - <strong>2007</strong>