14.06.2015 Views

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Graph 10.12. Structure of farms by employment of 15+ members, by quintiles of consumption<br />

(members active in non-agricultural activities / members active in agriculture)<br />

49<br />

72<br />

48<br />

64<br />

55 49 44<br />

26<br />

Not active in<br />

agriculture<br />

51<br />

28<br />

52<br />

36<br />

45 51 56<br />

74<br />

Active in agriculture<br />

Below Above The<br />

poorest<br />

2 3 4 The<br />

richest<br />

Total Poverty line <strong>2007</strong> Quintiles of consumption<br />

Census <strong>2002</strong> indicates that the majority of<br />

labour recruited to work in agriculture in <strong>Serbia</strong><br />

(75 percent) fits into a category of labour producing<br />

for their own needs, while only 20 percent of<br />

workers in agriculture produce for the market<br />

(Table 4). The proportion of women in the<br />

agricultural labour force producing for the market is<br />

extremely low (26.1 percent) which is the case in<br />

other transition countries as well (IFAD <strong>2002</strong>). The<br />

remaining 5 percent of workers in agriculture are<br />

manual workers (day labourers).<br />

From the prospective of diversification of<br />

income and activities of members of agricultural<br />

households, one can conclude that differences in<br />

their standard of living depends on other nonagricultural<br />

activities i.e. their opportunity to get<br />

off-farm employment. This implies that human<br />

capital and labour force performances have the<br />

greatest impact on agricultural households'<br />

vulnerability5F6 . Besides the high impact of wages on<br />

agricultural households standard of living the data<br />

shows that “part time” farms, especially those with<br />

a younger and more qualified labour force are richer<br />

compared to the others. This conclusion supports<br />

the general conclusion that “part-time" farms are<br />

those having higher standards, better educational<br />

and age structure of their members compared with<br />

other types of households in rural areas and<br />

agricultural households6F7 , and are considered to be<br />

leaders in progress, technical, technological and<br />

other innovations in rural areas.<br />

Table 10.3. Activities of the labour force by household type<br />

Total Agricultural farms Non-agricultural farms<br />

Active members 15+ 100.0 100.0 100.0<br />

Active 54.1 59.6 51.3<br />

Employed (non-agricultural activities) 37.0 27.5 41.8<br />

Farmers and members helping in<br />

agricultural activities<br />

10.0 26.4 1.6<br />

Unemployed 7.1 5.7 7.9<br />

Inactive 45.9 40.5 48.7<br />

Pensioners 20.8 17.4 22.6<br />

Housewife 4.7 5.1 4.4<br />

Pupils and students 9.8 8.0 10.8<br />

Incapable of work 2.1 2.0 2.1<br />

Other inactive 8.5 8.0 8.8<br />

Agriculture<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!