Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Graph 10.12. Structure of farms by employment of 15+ members, by quintiles of consumption<br />
(members active in non-agricultural activities / members active in agriculture)<br />
49<br />
72<br />
48<br />
64<br />
55 49 44<br />
26<br />
Not active in<br />
agriculture<br />
51<br />
28<br />
52<br />
36<br />
45 51 56<br />
74<br />
Active in agriculture<br />
Below Above The<br />
poorest<br />
2 3 4 The<br />
richest<br />
Total Poverty line <strong>2007</strong> Quintiles of consumption<br />
Census <strong>2002</strong> indicates that the majority of<br />
labour recruited to work in agriculture in <strong>Serbia</strong><br />
(75 percent) fits into a category of labour producing<br />
for their own needs, while only 20 percent of<br />
workers in agriculture produce for the market<br />
(Table 4). The proportion of women in the<br />
agricultural labour force producing for the market is<br />
extremely low (26.1 percent) which is the case in<br />
other transition countries as well (IFAD <strong>2002</strong>). The<br />
remaining 5 percent of workers in agriculture are<br />
manual workers (day labourers).<br />
From the prospective of diversification of<br />
income and activities of members of agricultural<br />
households, one can conclude that differences in<br />
their standard of living depends on other nonagricultural<br />
activities i.e. their opportunity to get<br />
off-farm employment. This implies that human<br />
capital and labour force performances have the<br />
greatest impact on agricultural households'<br />
vulnerability5F6 . Besides the high impact of wages on<br />
agricultural households standard of living the data<br />
shows that “part time” farms, especially those with<br />
a younger and more qualified labour force are richer<br />
compared to the others. This conclusion supports<br />
the general conclusion that “part-time" farms are<br />
those having higher standards, better educational<br />
and age structure of their members compared with<br />
other types of households in rural areas and<br />
agricultural households6F7 , and are considered to be<br />
leaders in progress, technical, technological and<br />
other innovations in rural areas.<br />
Table 10.3. Activities of the labour force by household type<br />
Total Agricultural farms Non-agricultural farms<br />
Active members 15+ 100.0 100.0 100.0<br />
Active 54.1 59.6 51.3<br />
Employed (non-agricultural activities) 37.0 27.5 41.8<br />
Farmers and members helping in<br />
agricultural activities<br />
10.0 26.4 1.6<br />
Unemployed 7.1 5.7 7.9<br />
Inactive 45.9 40.5 48.7<br />
Pensioners 20.8 17.4 22.6<br />
Housewife 4.7 5.1 4.4<br />
Pupils and students 9.8 8.0 10.8<br />
Incapable of work 2.1 2.0 2.1<br />
Other inactive 8.5 8.0 8.8<br />
Agriculture<br />
145