Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10.3.3. diversification of income and<br />
activities of members of<br />
agricultural households<br />
Diversification of income of agricultural<br />
households represents a precondition for<br />
diversification of activities and reduction in their<br />
poverty because it reduces the high income risk of<br />
agricultural population in extensive agricultural<br />
production. The income structure indicates that<br />
income from agriculture does not represent a<br />
crucial factor for classification of agricultural<br />
households by quintiles of consumption, but income<br />
from other sources (Graph 11). Data on differences<br />
in amount of agricultural income between the<br />
richest and poorest that are relatively small supports<br />
this conclusion. Monthly income from agriculture of<br />
the richest and poorest agricultural households is<br />
1:2.6 (6 062 dinar compared to 15 751 dinar), while<br />
the ratio between their salaries is 1:3.3 (9 251 dinar<br />
compared to 31 547 dinar).<br />
The data above shows that there is<br />
disproportional relation between the employed in<br />
agriculture (49 percent) and the share in total<br />
household income (20 percent), indicating low<br />
agriculture productivity. LSMS does not provide<br />
reliable data on agricultural income structure (share<br />
of income from the sale of agricultural products,<br />
machinery services, day wages, sale of processed<br />
agricultural products and handicrafts products,<br />
etc.)3F4 . But based on the previous surveys (Bogdanov<br />
N. <strong>2007</strong>.) it is well-known that income generated on<br />
farms is diversified to certain extent, due to which<br />
(especially smaller farms) are exposed to greater<br />
income risk4F5 .<br />
The great importance of income diversification<br />
for the standard of living of the rural population is<br />
confirmed also by data regarding the diversification<br />
of activities of members of agricultural households.<br />
Farms with member that are 15+ employed only in<br />
the agricultural sector are exposed to a high poverty<br />
risk. Among farms that are below the poverty line,<br />
72 percent are those whose able-bodied members<br />
(15+) are active only in the agricultural sector<br />
(Graph 12).<br />
Data on the activities of members of<br />
agricultural households indicates that 60 percent of<br />
members aged 15+ are equally active in agricultural<br />
and non-agricultural activities. Agricultural<br />
households have a lower unemployment rate and<br />
non-self supporting members compared to nonagricultural<br />
households (Table 3.). The reason for<br />
the relatively more favourable labour indicators of<br />
members of agricultural households comes from the<br />
definition of employment that also includes the<br />
unpaid labour force. The high employment rate in<br />
agriculture, such as in <strong>Serbia</strong>, causes labour market<br />
indicators in rural areas and in agricultural<br />
households have better values.<br />
Graph 10.11. Income of agricultural households by quintiles of consumption<br />
27 27 28 27 27 27<br />
Other incomes<br />
20 19 18 18 22 21<br />
Income from agriculture<br />
17<br />
24<br />
19 17<br />
14<br />
11<br />
Pensions (old age, family,<br />
disablement and other)<br />
37<br />
29<br />
35 39 37 42<br />
Wages and salaries<br />
The poorest 2 3 4 The richest<br />
Total<br />
Quintiles of consumption<br />
144 <strong>Living</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>Measurements</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2002</strong> - <strong>2007</strong>