14.06.2015 Views

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

favourable compared to the non-agricultural<br />

households (Graph 7). The aging rate (ratio between<br />

population over 65 and below 15-year old) of the<br />

agricultural households indicates that the ratio of the<br />

eldest members of households is 67 percent higher<br />

compared to the young population. Therefore, the<br />

educational structure of members of the agricultural<br />

households is significantly negative, since a third<br />

has uncompleted primary school and a quarter has<br />

only completed primary education.<br />

Graph 10.7. Age and educational structure of<br />

members by household type<br />

0-14<br />

15-29<br />

12.9%<br />

14.5%<br />

17.4%<br />

21.4%<br />

particular knowledge and skills. The above data are<br />

compatible to the great extent with findings from<br />

the survey “Small Rural Households in <strong>Serbia</strong> and<br />

Rural Non-agricultural Economy”, according to<br />

which 52 percent of respondents did not recognize<br />

additional skill of members of own households that<br />

could help to generate additional income. Low<br />

labour force quality in agricultural households has<br />

negative impact on their standards, and on overall<br />

poverty. Farms with greater numbers of elderly<br />

members and less educated members are poorer<br />

(Graph 8).<br />

Total<br />

Graph 10.8. Human resources of agricultural<br />

households, by quintiles of consumption<br />

26,9%<br />

51,7%<br />

Age<br />

Educational structure<br />

30-44<br />

45-59<br />

60-64<br />

65+<br />

No school<br />

Primary<br />

school<br />

Vocational<br />

school<br />

Secondary<br />

school<br />

University<br />

18.8%<br />

19.5%<br />

24.1%<br />

24.2%<br />

5.4%<br />

5.1%<br />

21.5%<br />

15.3%<br />

32.2%<br />

22.6%<br />

25.7%<br />

16.9%<br />

13.5%<br />

11.6%<br />

23.0%<br />

33.5%<br />

5.6%<br />

15.4%<br />

Poverty line <strong>2007</strong><br />

Quintiles of consumption<br />

Below<br />

Above<br />

The<br />

poorest<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

The<br />

richest<br />

25,5%<br />

28,9%<br />

24,7%<br />

20,6%<br />

Percent members 60+<br />

37,8%<br />

39,7%<br />

17,5%<br />

32,1%<br />

47,0%<br />

49,8%<br />

56,2%<br />

51,2%<br />

69,5%<br />

78,6%<br />

Agricultural<br />

Non-agricultural households<br />

Percent members with primary school or lower<br />

educational attainment, 15+<br />

Poor knowledge and skills of the overall<br />

population are confirmed LSMS <strong>2007</strong> according to<br />

which 97 percent of the rural population answered<br />

that they have not attended additional trainings and<br />

courses, while 54 percent state that they do not have<br />

Agriculture<br />

Knowledge and skills of the rural labour force<br />

do not correspond with modern technological<br />

requirements and have an insufficient impact on the<br />

total labour force capacities in rural areas. Labour<br />

force quality represents one of the limiting factors in<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!