Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
favourable compared to the non-agricultural<br />
households (Graph 7). The aging rate (ratio between<br />
population over 65 and below 15-year old) of the<br />
agricultural households indicates that the ratio of the<br />
eldest members of households is 67 percent higher<br />
compared to the young population. Therefore, the<br />
educational structure of members of the agricultural<br />
households is significantly negative, since a third<br />
has uncompleted primary school and a quarter has<br />
only completed primary education.<br />
Graph 10.7. Age and educational structure of<br />
members by household type<br />
0-14<br />
15-29<br />
12.9%<br />
14.5%<br />
17.4%<br />
21.4%<br />
particular knowledge and skills. The above data are<br />
compatible to the great extent with findings from<br />
the survey “Small Rural Households in <strong>Serbia</strong> and<br />
Rural Non-agricultural Economy”, according to<br />
which 52 percent of respondents did not recognize<br />
additional skill of members of own households that<br />
could help to generate additional income. Low<br />
labour force quality in agricultural households has<br />
negative impact on their standards, and on overall<br />
poverty. Farms with greater numbers of elderly<br />
members and less educated members are poorer<br />
(Graph 8).<br />
Total<br />
Graph 10.8. Human resources of agricultural<br />
households, by quintiles of consumption<br />
26,9%<br />
51,7%<br />
Age<br />
Educational structure<br />
30-44<br />
45-59<br />
60-64<br />
65+<br />
No school<br />
Primary<br />
school<br />
Vocational<br />
school<br />
Secondary<br />
school<br />
University<br />
18.8%<br />
19.5%<br />
24.1%<br />
24.2%<br />
5.4%<br />
5.1%<br />
21.5%<br />
15.3%<br />
32.2%<br />
22.6%<br />
25.7%<br />
16.9%<br />
13.5%<br />
11.6%<br />
23.0%<br />
33.5%<br />
5.6%<br />
15.4%<br />
Poverty line <strong>2007</strong><br />
Quintiles of consumption<br />
Below<br />
Above<br />
The<br />
poorest<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
The<br />
richest<br />
25,5%<br />
28,9%<br />
24,7%<br />
20,6%<br />
Percent members 60+<br />
37,8%<br />
39,7%<br />
17,5%<br />
32,1%<br />
47,0%<br />
49,8%<br />
56,2%<br />
51,2%<br />
69,5%<br />
78,6%<br />
Agricultural<br />
Non-agricultural households<br />
Percent members with primary school or lower<br />
educational attainment, 15+<br />
Poor knowledge and skills of the overall<br />
population are confirmed LSMS <strong>2007</strong> according to<br />
which 97 percent of the rural population answered<br />
that they have not attended additional trainings and<br />
courses, while 54 percent state that they do not have<br />
Agriculture<br />
Knowledge and skills of the rural labour force<br />
do not correspond with modern technological<br />
requirements and have an insufficient impact on the<br />
total labour force capacities in rural areas. Labour<br />
force quality represents one of the limiting factors in<br />
141