14.06.2015 Views

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

Living Standards Measurements Study - Serbia 2002 - 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10. AGRICULTURE<br />

10.1. Rural poverty<br />

Agriculture is closely related to poverty: the<br />

poorest areas are those with high employment rates<br />

in the agricultural sector. The same is true for<br />

households. Households relying to greater extent on<br />

income from agriculture are poorer than others.<br />

Such a situation is caused by lower productivity of<br />

the agricultural production compared to other<br />

industries. Furthermore agricultural dominance<br />

indicates the unfavourable performance of other<br />

industries and a low economic development rate. In<br />

such circumstances, agriculture represents a<br />

"shelter" for numerous rural populations (especially<br />

those with limited physical, human, financial and<br />

social capital) not capable of participating in overall<br />

economic growth.<br />

The situation above applies to European<br />

countries, as well. In Europe, especially in Southern<br />

and Eastern European countries, agriculture still has<br />

an important economic and social role, although its<br />

productivity is well-below the level achieved by<br />

other industries0F1 . High-levels of rural poverty in<br />

Europe, although not extreme poverty, are common<br />

in Central and Eastern European countries in the<br />

early transition and EU accession period, and in<br />

some Mediterranean regions and Balkan countries1F2 .<br />

Various studies indicate that transition, particularly<br />

in its early stage, is closely related to social tensions<br />

and growing inequality of the rural population. In<br />

the IFAD study (<strong>2002</strong>) “Assessment of Rural<br />

Poverty – Central and Eastern European Countries<br />

and New Independent States”, the following groups<br />

are classified as particularly vulnerable to rural<br />

poverty:<br />

• Farmers in upland and mountainous areas –<br />

these populations often live in extreme poverty and<br />

are not capable of producing sufficient food to meet<br />

their own needs. Market and communication<br />

isolation as well as overall underdevelopment of the<br />

region significantly reduces generation of additional<br />

income.<br />

• Rural wage earners. Rural households, with<br />

income exclusively from wages (especially those<br />

households with no land or no other capital) are, as<br />

a rule, poorer than others. Considering limited<br />

resources, these households usually do not produce<br />

enough food even for their own needs.<br />

• Rural women. Women's share in the poor<br />

rural population, as a rule, is growing in the<br />

transition period, having an adverse impact on<br />

gender equality. The study states that a trend of<br />

"rural feminization" is still present in analyzed<br />

countries as a consequence of the migration of men<br />

to cities in search of employment. Women are left<br />

on the farm to deal with own production agricultural<br />

production and are not able to diversify their<br />

activities due to numerous household obligations.<br />

• The elderly. Pensioners also account for a<br />

large share of the poor rural population. In analyzed<br />

countries, they are usually “returnees” who were<br />

prime beneficiaries of the land restitution programs.<br />

However, many are no longer capable of farming or<br />

lack basic machinery and equipment to start<br />

production. Considering the underdeveloped land<br />

market, income coming (possibly) from rent is<br />

modest and usually in kind.<br />

• Ethnic minorities. The creation of new state<br />

borders has caused increasing numbers of minority<br />

groups and growing competitiveness for limited<br />

resources along the line of majority-minority<br />

relations. The IFAD study states that during the land<br />

restitution process in post-communist countries,<br />

members of ethnic minorities had unequal treatment<br />

in rural areas in terms of their status in the<br />

privatization process and access to capital.<br />

• Internally displaced people. A high<br />

percentage of refugees and IDPs live in rural areas.<br />

Usually they do not own land, access to labour and<br />

financial markets is difficult and they depend on<br />

social allowances.<br />

More reliable conclusions on compatibility of<br />

these findings with the <strong>Serbia</strong>n situation needs<br />

additional research, but can be accepted in principle<br />

(Box 1).<br />

134 <strong>Living</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> <strong>Measurements</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2002</strong> - <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!