Lakes and Watercourses

Lakes and Watercourses Lakes and Watercourses

kalme.daba.lv
from kalme.daba.lv More from this publisher
11.06.2015 Views

In lakes, Secchi depth is classified using seasonal mean values (May – October) over one year, based on monthly readings using a Secchi disk in the offshore area of the lake. Underwater binoculars should be used to ensure that accurate readings can be taken in different weather conditions. The assessment scale is intended to group concentration levels typical of Swedish lakes and watercourses and is not related to biological or microbial effects. Comments Classifications must be based on samples taken and analyses made in accordance with the Swedish EPA Environmental Monitoring Handbook. If assessments are made on the basis of more limited data, this should be stated. The variables to be used for classification should be decided from case to case. As a rule, it is not necessary to use all the given variables. The scales should be used bearing in mind the wide natural variation between individual lakes and from year to year. All the given variables vary from season to season, in running water often depending on the flow rate. Periods of high flow are frequently associated with high colour and turbidity. Sampling should therefore ensure that periods with highest flow are also represented. Algal production has a very powerful influence on both turbidity and Secchi depth in lakes, particularly eutrophic ones. References Anonymous (1989): Vannkvalitetskriterier for ferskvann (”Quality criteria for fresh water”). Norwegian EPA. US EPA (1986): Quality criteria for water. – EPA 440/5-86-001. Wiederholm, T. (1989): Bedömningsgrunder för sjöar och vattendrag. Bakgrundsrapport 1. Näringsämnen, syre, ljus, försurning. (”Environmental Quality Criteria for Lakes and Watercourses. Background report 1 – Nutrients, oxygen, light, acidification”). Swedish EPA Report 3627. 35

Acidity / acidification Introduction The acidity of water is significant to aquatic organisms because it affects a number of important biotic and abiotic processes. Indirectly, acidity is also important to aquatic organisms because it governs the chemical form in which metals occur. Dissolved aluminium is particularly important, since this may occur in toxic form at high concentrations under acid conditions. Most waters have a buffering capacity, ie, they are able to neutralise the input of acidic substances. Buffering capacity is principally determined by hydrocarbonate; only when this is nearly exhausted can water become severely acidified. Alkalinity is used here as a measure of buffering capacity. The lower the alkalinity, the greater the effect of acidic input on the acidity. An alternative measure of buffering capacity is ANC (acid neutralising capacity), which, in addition to hydrocarbonate, also includes organic anions. The difference between ANC and alkalinity is fairly small in clear waters, but in brown (humic) waters, ANC may be substantially higher than alkalinity. ANC has become more widely used internationally for acidification assessments in recent years, although alkalinity has a simpler and clearer correlation to the acidity of water. When alkalinity approaches zero pH falls most rapidly, regardless of the ANC level at that point. The water’s natural content of organic anions may have an appreciable effect on its acidity and sensitivity to acidification. However, the fact that alkalinity rather than ANC has been chosen as the measure of buffering capacity does not mean that this natural effect is assumed to be non-existent, nor that it is confused with anthropogenic impact. The calculation below showing how present buffering capacity differs from that during the pre-industrial era, solely refers to the change caused by the sulphur deposition of recent years, regardless of the original acidity of the water. In practice, this change in buffering capacity will be equally great, whether it is measured as the difference in alkalinity or the difference in ANC. However, the estimated correlation between present and pre-industrial alkalinity is easier to use than the equivalent ANC correlation as the basis for an assessment of whether the pH of the water has been affected by acid deposition. 36

Acidity / acidification<br />

Introduction<br />

The acidity of water is significant to aquatic organisms because it affects a<br />

number of important biotic <strong>and</strong> abiotic processes. Indirectly, acidity is also<br />

important to aquatic organisms because it governs the chemical form in<br />

which metals occur. Dissolved aluminium is particularly important, since<br />

this may occur in toxic form at high concentrations under acid conditions.<br />

Most waters have a buffering capacity, ie, they are able to neutralise<br />

the input of acidic substances. Buffering capacity is principally determined<br />

by hydrocarbonate; only when this is nearly exhausted can water<br />

become severely acidified. Alkalinity is used here as a measure of<br />

buffering capacity. The lower the alkalinity, the greater the effect of acidic<br />

input on the acidity.<br />

An alternative measure of buffering capacity is ANC (acid neutralising<br />

capacity), which, in addition to hydrocarbonate, also includes organic<br />

anions. The difference between ANC <strong>and</strong> alkalinity is fairly small in clear<br />

waters, but in brown (humic) waters, ANC may be substantially higher<br />

than alkalinity. ANC has become more widely used internationally for<br />

acidification assessments in recent years, although alkalinity has a simpler<br />

<strong>and</strong> clearer correlation to the acidity of water. When alkalinity approaches<br />

zero pH falls most rapidly, regardless of the ANC level at that point.<br />

The water’s natural content of organic anions may have an appreciable<br />

effect on its acidity <strong>and</strong> sensitivity to acidification. However, the fact<br />

that alkalinity rather than ANC has been chosen as the measure of<br />

buffering capacity does not mean that this natural effect is assumed to be<br />

non-existent, nor that it is confused with anthropogenic impact. The<br />

calculation below showing how present buffering capacity differs from<br />

that during the pre-industrial era, solely refers to the change caused by<br />

the sulphur deposition of recent years, regardless of the original acidity of<br />

the water. In practice, this change in buffering capacity will be equally<br />

great, whether it is measured as the difference in alkalinity or the<br />

difference in ANC. However, the estimated correlation between present<br />

<strong>and</strong> pre-industrial alkalinity is easier to use than the equivalent ANC<br />

correlation as the basis for an assessment of whether the pH of the water<br />

has been affected by acid deposition.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!