Lakes and Watercourses
Lakes and Watercourses Lakes and Watercourses
used to estimate the distribution of benthic vegetation, for example, since double the Secchi depth is regarded as a rough measure of compensation depth, ie, the depth at which photosynthesis does not occur. Only current conditions scales are given for the above parameters. Assessment of deviation from reference values is hindered by the absence of background data more than is the case with other quality parameters. Assessment of current conditions TABLE 12. CURRENT CONDITIONS: water colour Class Description Abs f 400/5 Colour figure (mgPt/l) 1 Clear, or hardly discoloured water ≤ 0.02 ≤ 10 2 Slightly discoloured water 0.02 – 0.05 10 – 25 3 Moderately discoloured water 0.05 – 0.12 25 – 60 4 Substantially discoloured water 0.12 – 0.2 60 – 100 5 Heavily discoloured water > 0.2 > 100 In lakes, classification of water colour is based on seasonal mean values (May – October) over one year, based on monthly readings taken in surface water (0.5 m) or in samples taken from several depths. Assessment of watercourses should be based on samples taken 12 times over one year. The assessment scale is intended to group water colour levels typical of Swedish lakes and watercourses and is not related to biological or microbial effects. Photometer readings of the absorbency of filtered water (0.45 µm membrane filter) in a 5 cm cuvette at a wavelength of 420 nm give greater accuracy than readings of water colour using a colour comparator, particular at low colour levels. Photometer readings are therefore preferable. The table shows a multiplication factor of 500, used to convert absorbency units (abs f 420/5 ) to a colour value. This factor involves an element of uncertainty. 33
TABLE 13. CURRENT CONDITIONS: turbidity Class Description FNU units 1 No or insignificant turbidity ≤ 0.5 2 Slightly turbid 0.5 – 1.0 3 Moderately turbid 1.0 – 2.5 4 Substantially turbid 2.5 – 7.0 5 Highly turbid > 7.0 In lakes, turbidity is classified using seasonal mean values (May – October) over one year, based on monthly readings taken in surface water (0.5 m) or in samples taken at several depths. Assessment of watercourses should be based on samples taken 12 times over one year. The assessment scale classifies group concentration levels typical of Swedish lakes and watercourses and is not related to biological or microbial effects. Turbidity readings using different methods yield somewhat different results. The previous Swedish standard expressed turbidity as FTU (formazine turbidity units). The present Swedish and ISO standard states readings in the form of FNU (formazine nephelometric units). Other methods involve readings expressed as NTU (nephelometric turbidity units) or JTU (Jackson turbidity units). For practical purposes, 1 FTU = 1 FNU = 1 NTU ≈ JTU. TABLE 14. CURRENT CONDITIONS: Secchi depth in lakes Class Description Depth (m) 1 Very great Secchi depth ≥ 8 2 Great Secchi depth 5 – 8 3 Moderate Secchi depth 2.5 – 5 4 Little Secchi depth 1 – 2.5 5 Very little Secchi depth < 1 34
- Page 1 and 2: Environmental Quality Criteria - La
- Page 3 and 4: TO ORDER Swedish Environmental Prot
- Page 5 and 6: Reference Group Mats Bengtsson, Swe
- Page 7 and 8: Summary This report on lakes and wa
- Page 11 and 12: included. In addition to a large nu
- Page 13 and 14: ased estimates are used. Given that
- Page 15 and 16: TABLE 1. SUMMARY of parameters incl
- Page 17 and 18: 16 The current conditions scale in
- Page 19 and 20: (in Swedish with English summary).
- Page 21 and 22: conditions for watercourse flora an
- Page 23 and 24: show the availability of nitrogen i
- Page 25 and 26: Mean concentration of total phospho
- Page 27 and 28: TABLE 9. DEVIATION from reference v
- Page 29 and 30: Comments Classifications must be ba
- Page 31 and 32: winter/spring, i.e. ice-covered per
- Page 33: Light conditions Introduction Light
- Page 37 and 38: Acidity / acidification Introductio
- Page 39 and 40: industrial pH). The change in acidi
- Page 41 and 42: The pre-industrial concentration of
- Page 43 and 44: very high degree of reliability and
- Page 45 and 46: TABLE 19. CURRENT CONDITIONS: metal
- Page 47 and 48: TABLE 22. DEVIATION from reference
- Page 49 and 50: TABLE 24. (continued) Cu Zn Cd Pb C
- Page 51 and 52: Swedish EPA (1993): Metals and the
- Page 53 and 54: Assessment of current conditions TA
- Page 55 and 56: TABLE 29. CURRENT CONDITIONS: poten
- Page 57 and 58: TABLE 32. DEVIATION from reference
- Page 59 and 60: References Cronberg, G., Lindmark,
- Page 61 and 62: (see Appendix 1). If submerged and
- Page 63 and 64: References Andersson, B. (1998): Va
- Page 65 and 66: The genera in question and their tr
- Page 67 and 68: Benthic fauna Introduction Benthic
- Page 69 and 70: TABLE 41. CURRENT CONDITIONS: botto
- Page 71 and 72: Comments The assessment must be bas
- Page 73 and 74: has yielded better results than did
- Page 75 and 76: TABLE 45. CURRENT CONDITIONS: fish,
- Page 77 and 78: TABLE 46. DEVIATION from reference
- Page 79 and 80: TABLE 48. DEVIATION from reference
- Page 81 and 82: TABLE 48. (Contd.) Proportion of al
used to estimate the distribution of benthic vegetation, for example, since<br />
double the Secchi depth is regarded as a rough measure of compensation<br />
depth, ie, the depth at which photosynthesis does not occur.<br />
Only current conditions scales are given for the above parameters.<br />
Assessment of deviation from reference values is hindered by the absence<br />
of background data more than is the case with other quality parameters.<br />
Assessment of current conditions<br />
TABLE 12.<br />
CURRENT CONDITIONS: water colour<br />
Class Description Abs f 400/5<br />
Colour figure<br />
(mgPt/l)<br />
1 Clear, or hardly discoloured water ≤ 0.02 ≤ 10<br />
2 Slightly discoloured water 0.02 – 0.05 10 – 25<br />
3 Moderately discoloured water 0.05 – 0.12 25 – 60<br />
4 Substantially discoloured water 0.12 – 0.2 60 – 100<br />
5 Heavily discoloured water > 0.2 > 100<br />
In lakes, classification of water colour is based on seasonal mean values<br />
(May – October) over one year, based on monthly readings taken in<br />
surface water (0.5 m) or in samples taken from several depths.<br />
Assessment of watercourses should be based on samples taken 12 times<br />
over one year. The assessment scale is intended to group water colour<br />
levels typical of Swedish lakes <strong>and</strong> watercourses <strong>and</strong> is not related to<br />
biological or microbial effects.<br />
Photometer readings of the absorbency of filtered water (0.45 µm<br />
membrane filter) in a 5 cm cuvette at a wavelength of 420 nm give<br />
greater accuracy than readings of water colour using a colour comparator,<br />
particular at low colour levels. Photometer readings are therefore<br />
preferable. The table shows a multiplication factor of 500, used to<br />
convert absorbency units (abs f 420/5 ) to a colour value. This factor<br />
involves an element of uncertainty.<br />
33