Rumbling on performativity_Frits Simon

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat. The globalized world in the twenty-first century. (Newly revised and expanded ed.). London et al: Penguin. Frissen, P. (2008). De preventieve staat: waarom de droom van de gelijke samenleving een nachtmerrie is [The preventive state: why the dream of a society based on equality is a nightmare]. In F. Ankersmit & L. Klinkers (Eds.), De tien plagen van de staat [The ten plagues of the state] (pp. 148-169). Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Van Gennep. Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2011). The balance between bricolage and innovation: management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 581-595. Gabriel, Y. (2002). Essai: on paragrammatic uses of organizational theory - a provocation. Organization Studies, 23(1), 133-151. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program. Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham - Boulder - New York - Toronto - Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Gendt, W.-J. v., & Ritzen, R. (2011). De kwaliteit van het hbo. Reconstructie van een media-hype. [Quality of the universities of applied sciences. Reconstruction of a media-hype]. Puurs (B): Unibook. Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction (2011 ed.). London: SAGE. Gibbs, R. W. J. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York et al: Cambridge University Press. Giesen, P. (2010). De elite heeft het afgelegd [The elite has succumbed]. De Volkskrant, p. 5. Gingrich-Philbrook, C. (2013). Evaluating (evaluations of) autoethnography. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 609-626). Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press, Inc. Ginneken, J. v. (1999). Brein-bevingen. Snelle omslagen in opinie en communicatie. [Collective Behavior Public Opinion. Rapid Shifts in Opinion and Communication.] (2000 ed.). Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Boom. Ginneken, J. v. (2009). De kracht van de zwerm. Zelfsturing in de organisatie. [The power of the swarm. Self-organization in organizations]. Amsterdam: Business Contact. Goossen, H. (2012). Het belang van tegengas [The importance of resistance]. Limburgs Dagblad, p. 8. Grant, D., Iedema, R., & Oswick, C. (2009). Discourse and critical management studies. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies (2011 ed., pp. 213-231). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grey, C., & Willmott, H. (2005). Introduction. In C. Grey & H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies: a reader (2010 ed., pp. 1-15). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Griffin, D. (2002). The emergence of leadership : linking self-organization and ethics. London: Routledge. Groot, N. (2007). Strategic development of a merger: formulating and implementing at the same time. In R. D. Stacey (Ed.), Strategic management and organisational dynamics: the challenge of complexity (2007 ed., pp. 289-301). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited. Groot, N. (2010a). ‘Tot Rotterdam zijn jullie een stel’ Gedrag en identiteit als pijlers onder verbeterprocessen in organisatie.[Behaviour and identity as pillars of processes of improvement in an organization]. Heerlen: Open Universiteit. Groot, N. (2010b). Zelforganisatie en leiderschap. Een uitdagende paradox. [Self-organization and leadership. A daring paradox]. Amsterdam: Mediawerf. Groot, N., & Homan, T. (2012). Strategizing as a complex responsive leadership process. International Journal Learning and Change, 6(3/4), 156-170. Groot, N. d., & Gessel, R. v. (2009). De opkomst en ondergang van DSB [The rise and fall of DSB]. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Carrera. Habermas, J. (1981a). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung [The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society] (1982 ed. Vol. 1). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. Habermas, J. (1981b). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Zur kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft [The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: A Critique of Functionalist Reason] (1982. ed. Vol. 2). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. Hao, R. N. (2014). Performing fortune cookie: an autoethnograpic performance on diasporic hybritity. In R. M. Boylorn & M. P. Orbe (Eds.), Critical autoethnography. Intersecting cultural identities in everyday life (pp. 96-109). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc. 210
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge England ; New York; Paris: Cambridge University Press; Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme. Hellema, P., & Marsman, J. (1997). De organisatie-adviseur. Opkomst en groei van een nieuw vak in Nederland 1920-1960 [The organization consultant. Rise and grow of a new profession in The Netherlands 1920 - 1960] (1997 ed.). Amsterdam: Boom. Hetebrij, M. (2006). Macht en politiek handelen in organisaties [Power and acting politically in organizations]. Assen: Van Gorcum. Heuvel, H. v. d. (2012). Voorkom dat bestuurder een zonnekoning wordt [Prevent that a member of the board becomes a Sun King]. Trouw, p. 21. Hijmans, J. (1990). Vreemde aantrekkers en gestructureerde chaos [Strange attractors and structured chaos]. In H. Tennekes (Ed.), De vlinder van Lorenz. De verrassende dynamica van chaos [The butterfly of Lorenz. The surprising dynamics of chaos] (pp. 34-69). Bloemendaal: Aramith. Hodge, B., & Coronado, G. (2007). Understanding Change in Organizations in a Far-from- Equilibrium World. In S. O. Johannessen & L. Kuhn (Eds.), Complexity in Organization Studies (2012 ed., Vol. 3, pp. 141 - 158). London - Thousand Oaks - New Delhi - Singapore: SAGE Publications Ltd. Holman Jones, S., Adams, T. E., & Ellis, C. (2013a). Handbook of autoethnography. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press, Inc. Holman Jones, S., Adams, T. E., & Ellis, C. (2013b). Introduction: Coming to know autoethnography as more than a method. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 17-47). Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press, Inc. Homan, T. (2001). Teamleren. Theorie en facilitatie [Learning of teams. Theory and facilitating] (2001 ed.). Schoonhoven: Academic Service. Homan, T. (2005). Organisatiedynamica. Theorie en praktijk van organisatieverandering. [Dynamics of organization. Theory and practice of organization-change] (2009 ed.). Den Haag: Sdu uitgevers bv. Homan, T. (2006). Wolkenridders. Over de binnenkant van organisatieverandering.[Knights of the clouds. About the inside of organization-change]. Heerlen: Open Universiteit. Homan, T. (2013). Het et-cetera principe. Een nieuw perspectief op organisatieontwikkeling [The principle of et-cetera. A new perspective on organization development]. Den Haag: Academic Service. Homan, T. H. (2014). Locating narrative complex responsive process research in the intellectual traditions of theorizing about organizations (forthcoming). Hooge, E. (2013). Besturing van autonomie. Over de mythe van bestuurbare onderwijsorganisaties [Management of autonomy. About the myth of manageable organizations for education]. Tilburg: Tilburg University. Houben, M., & Wester, J. (2001). Baan. Opkomst en ondergang van een softwarebedrijf [Rise and fall of a software company]. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Busoness Contact. Ireland, R. D. (2012). Management Research and Managerial Practice: A Complex and Controversial Relationship. The Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 263-271. Johannessen, S. (2009). Complexity turn in studies of organisations and leadership. In S. O. Johannessen & L. Kuhn (Eds.), Complexity in organization studies. Implications and applications of complexity thinking in organization studies: leadership and organizational development (2012 ed., Vol. 4, pp. 159-178). Los Angeles - London - New Delhi - Singapore - Washington DC: SAGE. Johannessen, S. O. (2012). Against method: Arguing the case for non-standard methodological differentiation in researching complexity in organization studies. Concept paper. Oslo and Akerhus University of Applied Science. Oslo. Johnson, A. L. (2014). Negotiating more, (mis)labeling the body: a tale of intersectionality. In R. M. Boylorn & M. P. Orbe (Eds.), Critical autoethnography. Intersecting cultural identities in everyday life (pp. 81-95). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc. Jones, R. L. (2011). Leaving. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(7), 631-638. Kahneman, D. (2011). Ons feilbare denken [Thinking, fast en slow] (2012 ed.). Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Business Contact. References | 211
Page 1:
Rumbling on perfor
Page 4 and 5:
ISBN 978 909028 855 / NUR code 801
Page 6 and 7:
Promotores Prof. dr. T.H. Homan, Op
Page 8 and 9:
Preface When you are working on a P
Page 10 and 11:
4 Sense making in and of the intern
Page 12 and 13:
10 1
Page 14 and 15:
As the reader will notice it has no
Page 16 and 17:
agreements are connected to conditi
Page 18 and 19:
that in my job now, I have to manag
Page 20 and 21:
Insider research can be seen as phe
Page 22 and 23:
In a formal way a narrative is to d
Page 24 and 25:
within the UAS. This search was fue
Page 26 and 27:
24 2
Page 28 and 29:
This chapter is a methodological ch
Page 30 and 31:
interactions and their constructive
Page 32 and 33:
process of the constitution of nati
Page 34 and 35:
varying from social constructionism
Page 36 and 37:
To contribute to emancipatory trans
Page 38 and 39:
organizational life is trying to un
Page 40 and 41:
Ontologically reflexive research is
Page 42 and 43:
Auto-ethnography Auto-ethnography i
Page 44 and 45:
In its diversity auto-ethnography a
Page 46 and 47:
has to respond to questions regardi
Page 48 and 49:
pens with the results of the resear
Page 50 and 51:
From a radically reflexive stance i
Page 52 and 53:
alternate set of criteria could tur
Page 54 and 55:
dimensions should be ordinary eleme
Page 56 and 57:
one's own job security. Here again
Page 58 and 59:
2 Consult your institutional review
Page 60 and 61:
facts (for instance what did someon
Page 62 and 63:
The criteria will apply to the narr
Page 64 and 65:
This chapter is a prelude on four c
Page 66 and 67:
64 3
Page 68 and 69:
The narrative which is presented in
Page 70 and 71:
As a logical consequence of my para
Page 72 and 73:
3.3 Defaults-genesis part II: a you
Page 74 and 75:
y connecting concepts of the cognit
Page 76 and 77:
This sandwich position became tangi
Page 78 and 79:
connected with an engineering profe
Page 80 and 81:
However, I realize that the broad s
Page 82 and 83:
the realization of the UAS as a lea
Page 84 and 85:
just to proceed the way they always
Page 86 and 87:
Pursuing my research? On a conceptu
Page 88 and 89:
86 4
Page 90 and 91:
This narrative is about what happen
Page 92 and 93:
evaluation reports, that they can u
Page 94 and 95:
publish these findings in this way,
Page 96 and 97:
focussing at the outcome and specul
Page 98 and 99:
4.3 Emerging themes of reflection T
Page 100 and 101:
Varying ways of pushing through a d
Page 102 and 103:
Thus one of the results of our deli
Page 104 and 105:
Reflecting upon what the work Elias
Page 106 and 107:
interpretation contagion underlines
Page 108 and 109:
From a political perspective framin
Page 110 and 111:
whether a conclusion would be reali
Page 112 and 113:
Self-knowing At the end “all know
Page 114 and 115:
mental with generic implications an
Page 116 and 117:
Looking back on my rather cognitivi
Page 118 and 119:
116 5
Page 120 and 121:
In 2012 as any UAS the UAS had to d
Page 122 and 123:
with our management information sys
Page 124 and 125:
control, someone deludes you to thi
Page 126 and 127:
discussions as the deadline came ne
Page 128 and 129:
start for me in the midst of Februa
Page 130 and 131:
usyness and glamour of the ambition
Page 132 and 133:
Theories of change have built up ma
Page 134 and 135:
5.4 Reflections from a complex resp
Page 136 and 137:
ences are more important than other
Page 138 and 139:
should be the motto for spontaneous
Page 140 and 141:
they still may be dealing with the
Page 142 and 143:
possibility of involving a lot of p
Page 144 and 145:
ight way this time. These strategy
Page 146 and 147:
144 6
Page 148 and 149:
In recent years journalists reporte
Page 150 and 151:
actual situation. A discussion whic
Page 152 and 153:
you act and its implications. I exp
Page 154 and 155:
Acknowledging that we mostly talk a
Page 156 and 157:
A next meeting will be planned to r
Page 158 and 159:
Table 2: Different discourses regar
Page 160 and 161:
ecome ‘glass cages’ (Gabriel (2
Page 162 and 163: However, as mentioned before, the q
Page 164 and 165: esilient. Amongst others they sugge
Page 166 and 167: it is common sense that we are huma
Page 168 and 169: gen, 1999) Mead exemplifies that ou
Page 170 and 171: ject, partly because I had set out
Page 172 and 173: less detailed planning or putting f
Page 174 and 175: 172 7
Page 176 and 177: A title at the front page of a thes
Page 178 and 179: Before returning to them I recapitu
Page 180 and 181: led a discussion about an internali
Page 182 and 183: First encounter with the joker In p
Page 184 and 185: panoptical psychological pressure,
Page 186 and 187: address to when things go not as be
Page 188 and 189: A recent example of rumbling on per
Page 190 and 191: ons. As a subject as such performat
Page 192 and 193: Apparently an ironic or mocking sta
Page 194 and 195: dissent to develop opportunities to
Page 196 and 197: Analysis, reflexivity, researcher
Page 198 and 199: general sense my research was autho
Page 200 and 201: in the chapter 6 this already happe
Page 202 and 203: 3 councils for teachers / lecturers
Page 204 and 205: 7.8 Concluding remarks: a reconstru
Page 206 and 207: 204 References
Page 208 and 209: Ankersmit, F. (2008). De plaag van
Page 210 and 211: Commissie onderzoek financiële pro
Page 214 and 215: Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (200
Page 216 and 217: Mingers, J. (1992). Technical, prac
Page 218 and 219: Science Guide. (2012b). Prestatiebe
Page 220 and 221: Tedlock, B. (2013). Section three i
Page 222 and 223: Wit, B. d. (2013). Spiegelpaleis on
Page 224 and 225: Nederlandse samenvatting 222
Page 226 and 227: Radicaal reflexief onderzoek: theor
Page 228 and 229: Met de onderscheiden theoretische o
Page 230 and 231: Ook de vraag naar de aard en inhoud
Page 232 and 233: entiteit is, maar dat de diverse be
Page 234 and 235: 232 Summary
Page 236 and 237: perspective it comes down to the pr
Page 238 and 239: ger always kept a bit of an ambival
Page 240 and 241: king became visible, a way of decis
Page 242: 240
show all

Rumbling on performativity_Frits Simon

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?