Recreation Plan - East Hanover Township
Recreation Plan - East Hanover Township
Recreation Plan - East Hanover Township
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong><br />
Dauphin County, PA<br />
Adopted: 4/1/03<br />
Roth<strong>Plan</strong><br />
Harry B. Roth, AICP<br />
Community <strong>Plan</strong>ning Consultant<br />
22E <strong>East</strong> Roseville Road<br />
Lancaster, PA 17601<br />
Phone – (717) 560-2383<br />
Fax – (717) 560-3709<br />
Email – rothplan@dejazzd.com
EAST HANOVER TOWNSHIP<br />
MUNICIPAL DIRECTORY<br />
Board of Supervisors<br />
Sally Zaino, Chairman<br />
George Rish, Vice-Chairman<br />
Rod Nissley, Past Chairman<br />
Rebecca M. Oller<br />
Michael Yingling<br />
Administrative Staff<br />
Rebecca M. Oller, Facilitator<br />
Nora J. Schaffer, Secretary-Treasurer<br />
Deborah Casey, Administrative Assistant<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning Commission<br />
Larry McCarter, Chairman<br />
Joseph Kenny III, Vice-Chairman<br />
Richard Hoover<br />
Barry Nazar<br />
Chris O’Neil<br />
George Rish<br />
Patricia Tantum<br />
Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board<br />
Wendy Zimmerman, Chairman<br />
Donna Berkheimer, Vice-Chairman<br />
Jennifer Everts<br />
Chrissy Fletcher<br />
Russ Kiessling<br />
Judy Schmolitz<br />
Vacancy<br />
Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader<br />
Danielle Gornik<br />
Park Office - 376 North Crawford Road<br />
Grantville, PA 17028<br />
Telephone: 717/469-7614<br />
Fax: 717/469-1442<br />
Cell: 215-2120<br />
E-mail: ehparkrec@earthlink.net<br />
Hours: Monday through Friday<br />
8 A.M. –4 P.M. (flexible)<br />
EAST HANOVER TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL OFFICE<br />
8848 Jonestown Road<br />
Grantville, Pennsylvania 17028<br />
Telephone: 717/469-0833<br />
FAX: 717/469-1442<br />
Hours: Monday through Friday, 8 A.M.–4 P.M.
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Page<br />
Municipal Directory........................................................................................................................... i<br />
Table of Contents ..............................................................................................................................ii<br />
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1<br />
I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................2-3<br />
A. Purpose............................................................................................................................................2<br />
B. How to Use This <strong>Plan</strong> ...................................................................................................................2-3<br />
II. Study Goals .......................................................................................................................4-5<br />
A. <strong>Plan</strong>ning Goals.................................................................................................................................4<br />
B. Facilities Goals.................................................................................................................................5<br />
C. Administration Goals........................................................................................................................5<br />
III. Community Background ................................................................................................6-16<br />
A. Historical Sketch of <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Service.........................................................................6<br />
B. Municipal Budget Profile..................................................................................................................7<br />
C. <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Administration ...........................................................................................8-9<br />
D. <strong>Recreation</strong> Maintenance...........................................................................................................10-11<br />
E. <strong>Recreation</strong> Programs................................................................................................................11-12<br />
F. Population & Housing Studies..................................................................................................12-16<br />
IV.<br />
Facilities Inventory........................................................................................................17-20<br />
Parks Map.................................................................................................................... following page 17<br />
Community Parks .................................................................................................................................18<br />
Neighborhood Parks.............................................................................................................................18<br />
Private Parks....................................................................................................................................19-20<br />
V. Park Analysis & Recommendations ...........................................................................21-34<br />
Regional Parks .....................................................................................................................................21<br />
Community Parks ............................................................................................................................21-25<br />
Neighborhood Parks........................................................................................................................25-31<br />
Linear Parks.....................................................................................................................................31-39<br />
Riparian Buffers Map................................................................................................... following page 35<br />
VI. Mandatory Dedication ..................................................................................................40-43<br />
VII.<br />
Capital Budget...............................................................................................................44-45<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - ii - Table of Contents
Executive Summary<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has a long history of involvement in parks and recreation; however, its<br />
commitment has escalated over the last 10-15 years. This <strong>Plan</strong> will help the <strong>Township</strong> take the next step<br />
towards a more comprehensive system of parkland acquisition and development that can keep pace with<br />
projected growth.<br />
The <strong>Township</strong>’s recreation-related financial expenditures are growing rapidly while no means for park and<br />
recreation revenues exist. The projected growth of the <strong>Township</strong>’s population from 5322 in 2000, to 6912<br />
by the year 2020, will overburden the <strong>Township</strong>’s budgeted general funds, unless a separate form of<br />
recreation revenue can be activated.<br />
A volunteer Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board oversees the park and recreation system with help from the fulltime<br />
paid Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader. The <strong>Township</strong> offers a generous variety of recreation programs,<br />
particularly annual special events. A full-time Park and Building Maintenance employee devotes just<br />
under 2/3 of his time to park maintenance and the balance on maintaining the <strong>Township</strong>’s two buildings.<br />
Today the <strong>Township</strong> contains nine different park/recreation sites. Of these, only three are considered to<br />
be public facilities. The largest public facility is the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park with 60 acres<br />
and a full range of athletic, passive, picnic, playground and support facilities. The <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />
Elementary School and the adjoining Shellsville VFW ballfields comprise another significant park with<br />
multiple athletic fields, playgrounds and some indoor facilities. Finally, the Grantville Fire Company<br />
Carnival Grounds provide a home for the <strong>Township</strong>’s annual summer festival.<br />
With the development of the <strong>Township</strong>’s Municipal Park, the <strong>Township</strong> currently has public parkland at a<br />
rate of about 13.5 acres per 1000 population. This figure exceeds the nationally-accepted standard of 6-<br />
10 acres per 1000 population advocated by the National <strong>Recreation</strong> and Park Association. While this<br />
abundant acreage can meet the <strong>Township</strong>’s community-wide park needs for the projected future, local<br />
neighborhood deficiencies exist and will worsen as new planned urban neighborhoods develop. This <strong>Plan</strong><br />
recommends the development of four new neighborhood parks totaling 13 acres with $882,096 worth of<br />
park improvements to overcome this deficiency and serve the ultimate-buildout of the planned<br />
neighborhoods. In addition, the <strong>Plan</strong> recommends that $57,600 worth of repairs be made to the <strong>Township</strong><br />
Municipal Park and the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School. Last, the <strong>Plan</strong> recommends the conduct of a<br />
feasibility study for the creation of a new “Village Link Trail” that would link each of the <strong>Township</strong>’s<br />
planned urban neighborhoods with local parks and the Horseshoe Trail.<br />
State law enables the <strong>Township</strong> to require would-be developers to either dedicate parklands for public<br />
use or donate fees-in-lieu of dedication to the <strong>Township</strong> for such facilities. Based upon socio-economic<br />
conditions, the <strong>Township</strong> can require each new dwelling unit to dedicate .052 acres of parkland or pay a<br />
fee of about $2080. With the growth projected in the <strong>Township</strong>, this source of revenue can produce about<br />
40 new acres of parkland or about 1.6 million dollars over the next 20 years. This will result in a surplus of<br />
just under $250,000, when compared with specific planned parks and their improvements. This surplus<br />
can be used to fund the acquisition and development of the proposed Village Link Trail.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 1 - Executive Summary
I. Introduction<br />
A. Purpose of the <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Like any business, local governments need to chart future plans so that they can assure an<br />
efficient use of resources. Local governments are in the business of assuring public welfare<br />
and delivering public services. The preparation of a <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> provides a deliberate<br />
framework of information that can be used to make future decisions regarding the delivery<br />
of recreation services. In addition, this <strong>Plan</strong> will identify ways for <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> to<br />
work with the School District, to make the <strong>Township</strong> a better place to live and play.<br />
One definition of planning is “the allocation of municipal resources toward municipal goals<br />
and objectives”; this definition embodies the essence of this study. This study first catalogs,<br />
maps and describes the <strong>Township</strong>'s recreation-related resources. These resources include<br />
land, streams, roads, parks, neighborhoods, programs, schools, staff, finances, and so on.<br />
Analyses are performed to determine the capability of these resources to serve or<br />
accommodate recreation/open space needs.<br />
Next, a set of planning goals are formulated. These goals establish a list of priorities that<br />
need to be addressed. Third, the goals are applied to the municipal resources, yielding a<br />
future scheme for the development of parklands.<br />
Finally, implementation strategies are discussed and recommended that enable the<br />
<strong>Township</strong> to set in motion the analyses and information presented in the <strong>Plan</strong>. These<br />
strategies will involve those planning technologies currently available for use by local<br />
governments within the region. In the end, any planning process is meaningless, unless its<br />
recommendations find application as part of the <strong>Township</strong>'s business—the protection of<br />
public welfare and the delivery of public services. This <strong>Plan</strong> will serve as a supplement to<br />
the <strong>Township</strong>’s Official Comprehensive <strong>Plan</strong> concerning matters of parks and recreation.<br />
B. How to Use This <strong>Plan</strong><br />
This <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is aimed at assisting local officials in the administration of the<br />
<strong>Township</strong>'s recreation facilities. Many action-oriented recommendations have been<br />
expressed throughout the <strong>Plan</strong> text; these recommendations have been italicized and<br />
printed in bold letters, so that the decision-maker's attention is immediately drawn to<br />
them. The maps within the <strong>Plan</strong> have also been carefully prepared and colored, so that the<br />
information can be easily visualized. The many analyses utilized throughout the study were<br />
devised to maximize utility of the findings. Step-by-step description of these methodologies<br />
have been furnished to enable the reader to gain a better understanding of the issue, and<br />
its planning implications. Finally, a detailed table of contents appears at the beginning of<br />
the text, which provides quick reference to the appropriate sections of the study. All of<br />
these features will aid local decision-makers in their evaluation of future recreation<br />
proposals.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 2 - Chapter I – Introduction
A second important function of this <strong>Plan</strong> is its collection of important information. The <strong>Plan</strong><br />
provides convenient access to a wealth of up-to-date information concerning its many<br />
interrelated factors. This information will serve, not only <strong>Township</strong> officials, but service<br />
agencies, property owners, residents, business leaders, and prospective developers. The<br />
cataloging of existing conditions will also provide the groundwork upon which future <strong>Plan</strong><br />
updates can be more easily accomplished.<br />
Finally, the <strong>Plan</strong> conveys a set of policies regarding future recreation development within<br />
the <strong>Township</strong>. These policies are based upon the <strong>Township</strong>'s goals and can be useful to<br />
local decision-makers. In addition, many of the recommendations of this <strong>Plan</strong> specifically<br />
respond to the wishes of the general public, who were heard at several “town meetings”<br />
during the <strong>Plan</strong>’s preparation. Therefore, the <strong>Plan</strong> incorporates extensive public input.<br />
In summary, it is important for all of those persons involved and/or interested in the<br />
delivery of recreation services to read, at least once, and understand this entire <strong>Plan</strong>,<br />
at least once. Then, local decision-makers should keep it handy when evaluating<br />
future development proposals, service adjustments or public investments. The<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>'s format will avail considerable information, analysis and expertise, without<br />
requiring its complete rereading. In the end, it is hoped that the <strong>Plan</strong> will become a<br />
powerful, yet practical, tool in local decision-making.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 3 - Chapter I – Introduction
II. Study Goals<br />
F<br />
“If you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there!”<br />
-An old saying<br />
or any project to maximize its likelihood for success, it is important that goals be established to<br />
guide the efforts. This <strong>Plan</strong> and the <strong>Township</strong>’s park and recreation services are no exception.<br />
The following lists goals that have been expressed for this <strong>Plan</strong>. This list is derived from<br />
discussions with local officials during the summer of 2002.<br />
The overall goal of this plan is to establish a process by which <strong>Township</strong> residents can be provided<br />
with a suitable level of recreation facilities as growth occurs. The following lists the goals of this<br />
<strong>Plan</strong> by several key components:<br />
A. <strong>Plan</strong>ning Goals<br />
1. Coordinate the use of the <strong>Township</strong>’s facilities among its many varied users, so<br />
that anyone can use the <strong>Plan</strong> to understand who is responsible for park<br />
improvements, maintenance and scheduling.<br />
2. Evaluate the best way to continue the high level of volunteer effort in the delivery of<br />
recreation service.<br />
3. Ensure that recreation facilities are offered for everyone, young and old, active and<br />
sedentary, competitive and passive, etc.<br />
4. Inventory existing parks and determine the level of service they provide to the<br />
<strong>Township</strong>. Identify deficiencies at existing parks and suggest specific actions of<br />
remedy.<br />
5. Generate public support for recreation by educating them about its benefits.<br />
6. Foster a spirit of cooperation among the <strong>Township</strong>, the School District and other<br />
volunteer and semi-public groups.<br />
7. Provide specific, prioritized actions to improve the <strong>Township</strong>’s parks, identifying<br />
who is responsible for implementation, estimated costs, and potential funding<br />
sources.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 4 - Chapter II – Study Goals
B. Facilities Goals<br />
1. Provide an objective and reasoned system for the acquisition of new parks and<br />
recreation opportunities, the improvement of existing parks, and the maintenance<br />
of all parks.<br />
2. Conceptually plan for streamside buffers as a means of improving water quality,<br />
and providing recreation and “hands-on” educational settings, with particular<br />
emphasis on preserving the Manada Creek as an important trout fishery and the<br />
Swatara Creek as a water trail.<br />
3. Seek to link parks, schools and other activity centers with linear parks, streamside<br />
buffers and sidewalks with special attention paid to bike routes and hiking trails.<br />
4. Ensure that parks are well-kept, attractive and safe.<br />
5. Focus new parks into “urban neighborhoods” where a full range of public facilities<br />
and services are expected.<br />
6. Implement recommendations of the Swatara Greenway Corridor by acquiring and<br />
developing public access to the creek and protecting valuable recreation use<br />
C. Administration Goals<br />
1. Improve the planning and coordination of recreation facilities.<br />
2. Perform the requisite analyses to justify the <strong>Township</strong>’s use of mandatory<br />
dedication (or fees-in-lieu-thereof) of parklands within its subdivision and land<br />
development ordinance.<br />
3. Present recommendations regarding the most efficient and effective methods to<br />
provide parks.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 5 - Chapter II – Study Goals
III. Community Background<br />
A. Historical Sketch of <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Service<br />
During the first half of the last century, no emphasis was placed on organized recreation or activities.<br />
Instead, local residents relied upon the abundant nearby Appalachian and Horseshoe Trails and<br />
other natural features to derive much of their leisure pastimes. Hiking, fishing, hunting were popular<br />
activities and many local men were members of the Blue Ridge Sportsman’s Club. In addition<br />
Sunday school baseball competitions, pie socials and other church and school activities provided<br />
needed diversion from the work “down-on-the-farm.” Hershey Park opened in 1907 and provided<br />
facilities for organized picnics and family reunions.<br />
In 1948 the Grantville Fire Company began its annual summer carnival. The whole family lived for<br />
these Saturday nights of bingo, penny pitches, ball throws and chicken corn soup.<br />
In 1956 the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Association was formed to promote supervised recreation for<br />
area youth. It was comprised of representatives from local churches and civic and fraternal<br />
organizations. Summer playground programs, community parties, and summer picnics were planned<br />
and held. A “Teen-Canteen” held regular dances at the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School until 1962,<br />
when the school was merged into the Lower Dauphin School District. Since then, the School District<br />
has offered facilities and programs for the students’ recreation needs.<br />
Between 1962 and 1972 there was no formal recreation organization operating within the <strong>Township</strong><br />
until the formation of the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Interim <strong>Recreation</strong> Organization. This new effort sponsored a<br />
summer playground program, square dances, ice and roller skating parties, slimnastics for women,<br />
volleyball competitions, youth dances and costume parties. In the mid-1970s the Dauphin County<br />
Parks and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board became involved within the <strong>Township</strong> and offered tennis clinics and<br />
training for residents. They also sponsored entertainment at the Memorial Day Picnics held at the<br />
VFW Picnic Grove.<br />
<strong>Recreation</strong>al activities continued to be organized by the Interim Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board until<br />
the early 1980's. In the Fall, 1981, seven persons were appointed to the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong><br />
Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board. In the Summer, 1982 a questionnaire was sent to all township<br />
residents seeking input on the <strong>Recreation</strong> Board, the acquisition of land for recreational purposes,<br />
the means of financing recreational programs, etc. In November, 1982, the Board adopted<br />
Ordinance 82-4 which, in addition to creating the Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board, established the<br />
regulations for membership, officers, responsibilities, and financial considerations.<br />
In 1983, the first <strong>Township</strong> newsletter was published and mailed to all <strong>Township</strong> residents. A<br />
limited number of classes were conducted in various locations in the <strong>Township</strong>. In 1983, the<br />
<strong>Township</strong> purchased 13 acres of land for a new municipal building and a recreational area.<br />
<strong>Township</strong> activities were relocated to the new Municipal Building in 1986. <strong>Township</strong> officials<br />
purchased an additional 16 acres in 1988, an additional 6 acres in 1990, and an additional 25<br />
acres in 1993. In 1992, the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Board of Supervisors hired a part-time park<br />
attendant for the <strong>Township</strong>. In 1996, the position became a full-time <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader position.<br />
Today, with the aid of a very active Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board and a number of volunteers,<br />
residents and local officials take pride in their park system which is the envy of neighboring<br />
municipalities.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 6 - Chapter III – Community Background
B. Municipal Budget Profile<br />
The following graphs the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong>’s reported total expenditures and those<br />
assigned to culture/recreation needs during the years 1999 through 2001.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Expenses<br />
2,500,000.00<br />
6.00%<br />
2,000,000.00<br />
5.00%<br />
4.00%<br />
1,500,000.00<br />
3.00%<br />
1,000,000.00<br />
2.00%<br />
500,000.00<br />
1.00%<br />
0.00<br />
1999 2000 2001<br />
Total expenses 1,173,695.00 1,478,889.00 1,936,448.00<br />
Culture/<strong>Recreation</strong> Expenses 25,499.00 38,171.00 43,555.00<br />
% Culture/<strong>Recreation</strong> 2.10% 4.60% 5.70%<br />
0.00%<br />
While the <strong>Township</strong>’s budget has grown steadily the last three years, its expenses<br />
associated with culture/recreation have accelerated and now comprise almost 6 percent of<br />
the total expenses. The <strong>Township</strong>’s funding of culture/recreation facilities and programs<br />
has grown by over 170 percent during the last three years. Such dramatic increases cannot<br />
continue unless additional forms of revenue are obtained for these purposes. Clearly,<br />
culture/recreation has become one of the <strong>Township</strong>’s budget priorities as evidenced not<br />
only by these figures but the nice EHT Municipal Park and its various programs offered<br />
throughout the community.<br />
The <strong>Township</strong> now charges modest user fees to help defray ythe operating costs of<br />
particular programs and special events; however, these do not cover the total costs of<br />
services provided. This must change if the <strong>Township</strong> is to face the demands of a<br />
suburbanizing population that will expect high levels of recreation service. Fortunately,<br />
there are several revenue generating options available that the <strong>Township</strong> can employ. This<br />
<strong>Plan</strong> will provide the framework for tapping these funding sources and direct how the<br />
monies should be spent according to nationally-accepted levels of service.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 7 - Chapter III – Community Background
C. <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Administration<br />
<strong>Township</strong> Board of Supervisors - Within <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> the Board of<br />
Supervisors are the elected officials who have the final authority on all matters of the<br />
<strong>Township</strong>. This is also true with respect to parks and recreation. They allocate funds<br />
and manpower among all of the <strong>Township</strong>’s functions including parks and recreation. To<br />
assist their decision-making they have created several boards and staff positions as<br />
follows:<br />
Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board – This seven-member board was created in 1980 to<br />
develop the <strong>Township</strong>’s park system. Each member serves a five-year term and the<br />
Board is comprised of individuals appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Today their<br />
principal duties include:<br />
1. Select programs to be offered;<br />
2. Suggest park improvements;<br />
3. Recommend new parks;<br />
4. Compile quarterly recreation newsletter with program guides; and,<br />
5. Recommend budget for park maintenance.<br />
Parks and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader – This full-time paid staff position directs the day-to-day<br />
operations of the <strong>Township</strong>’s park and recreation system. This position has the following<br />
principal duties as described in the job description:<br />
1. Staff liaison between Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board and Board of Supervisors;<br />
2. Formulate, organize, supervise and evaluate a well-rounded program of<br />
recreation for the <strong>Township</strong>;<br />
3. Supervise and schedule use of the <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park;<br />
4. Coordinate with <strong>Township</strong> Facilitator maintenance of the <strong>Township</strong> Municipal<br />
Park;<br />
5. Recruit, train and supervise park employees,<br />
6. Assist Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board in the preparation of annual budget and report;<br />
7. Recommend appropriate program and facility use fees;<br />
8. Monitor park and recreation operations, programs and complaints and make<br />
suitable recommendations;<br />
9. Work closely with the school district and other civic groups involved in the<br />
delivery of recreation service;<br />
10. Keep abreast of developments and technologies of the recreation profession;<br />
11. Attend various local meetings as well as professional development conferences<br />
and seminars;<br />
12. Conduct maintenance and safety checks and make necessary recommendations<br />
for standard-of-care;<br />
13. Record information about program participation, registration, instructor forms,<br />
publicity, and research on special projects; and,<br />
14. Collects and accounts for all recreation fees.<br />
<strong>Township</strong> Secretary/Treasurer – Among this position’s other principal duties, the<br />
<strong>Township</strong> Secretary/Treasurer deposits all recreation fees.<br />
<strong>Township</strong> Facilitator - Among this position’s other principal duties, the <strong>Township</strong><br />
Facilitator acts as an initial point of contact between the Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader and<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 8 - Chapter III – Community Background
the Board of Supervisors. This person also oversees maintenance work performed on<br />
the <strong>Township</strong> buildings.<br />
With adoption of this plan comes the ability of the <strong>Township</strong> to collect mandatory<br />
dedicated parklands or fees-in-lieu thereof. This is the best, and most widely-used<br />
method of park system acquisition and development that basically enables municipalities<br />
to keep pace with growth. However, the use of this technique requires expertise on the<br />
specific applicable provisions of the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code that enable it. In<br />
addition, since this technique is applied during the subdivision and land development<br />
process, it forces those involved in the delivery of parks and recreation to become part of<br />
that review process. Finally, specific provisions of the <strong>Township</strong> zoning ordinance<br />
provide incentives for the creation and protection of parklands and open spaces.<br />
All of these “details” will likely strain local staff and officials’ knowledge and<br />
resulting initial use of the mandatory dedication approach. Therefore it is<br />
recommended that the <strong>Township</strong> sponsor a workshop for those involved in the<br />
process to educate all about how to apply this new approach.<br />
This workshop should focus upon:<br />
1. the duties of each person/agency in the review procedures of proposed<br />
developments with dedicated parklands or fees-in-lieu thereof;<br />
2. the specific deadlines imposed upon the development review process;<br />
3. the actual language contained within Sections 402.5.5. and 623 of the <strong>East</strong><br />
<strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance;<br />
4. the language of Section 503.(11) of the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code; and,<br />
5. those various provisions of the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Zoning Ordinance<br />
that provide incentives and design flexibility for the creation and protection<br />
of parklands and open spaces.<br />
This workshop could be presented by the <strong>Township</strong>’s planning consultants, the<br />
<strong>Township</strong>’s Solicitor, the <strong>Township</strong>’s engineer, local officials from adjoining<br />
municipalities who have experience with the process and/or staff from the State.<br />
Even after the conduct of this workshop, the review and approval of a<br />
development proposal can be difficult and require skillful negotiation. Therefore,<br />
it is recommended that the <strong>Township</strong> hire expert development plan review<br />
assistance from planning and engineering experts during the first few proposals<br />
that run through the process. These experts should assist in staff reviews of such<br />
proposals and attend the various Board and Commission hearings where the<br />
actual formal reviews occur. Then once local staff and officials become<br />
comfortable with their duties and roles, these “experts” can be used on an asneeded-basis,<br />
upon request from the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />
It is also important to note the <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Commission will now begin to<br />
play a role in the acquisition and development of parks since they are integral to<br />
the subdivision and land development review process. They too, should<br />
participate in the workshop.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 9 - Chapter III – Community Background
D. <strong>Recreation</strong> Maintenance<br />
Most rural <strong>Township</strong>’s beginning to develop their park system, generally assign park<br />
maintenance duties to general maintenance staff already in place. This is true of <strong>East</strong><br />
<strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> today. The duties of park maintenance are assigned to the Building<br />
and Park Maintenance employee. The job description for this position details daily,<br />
weekly and annual tasks to be performed within the <strong>Township</strong>’s two municipal buildings;<br />
however, no such schedule of routine tasks are provided for park maintenance. It is noted<br />
that the Parks and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader is currently developing such a schedule for<br />
this position.<br />
Also according to the job description, this person is to devote 30 hours per week to park<br />
maintenance during the spring, summer and fall months and 10 hours per week in the<br />
winter; the remaining time is to be spent maintaining the municipal buildings. Therefore<br />
maintenance assignments for parks account for nearly 2/3 of this position’s annual duties.<br />
The following lists the grounds-keeping and facilities responsibilities beyond those<br />
associated with municipal building maintenance specified within this position’s job<br />
description:<br />
1. grass mowing;<br />
2. trimming and weeding around buildings, paths, flowers, shrubs, trees, fences;<br />
3. planting of flowers, trees, shrubs;<br />
4. raking, collection of leaves, twigs, etc.;<br />
5. trimming of shrubbery, trees;<br />
6. mulching of gardens, play areas;<br />
7. fertilizing and seeding lawn areas as needed and as scheduled;<br />
8. cutting dead trees as needed;<br />
9. collecting trash, paper, rubbish, emptying trash receptacles on a regular basis;<br />
10. cleaning of rest rooms on a weekly basis from April to November & winterize in<br />
November;<br />
11. sweeping off athletic courts and pavilion, picnic shelter, gazebo, & amphitheater<br />
floors;<br />
12. raking of sandbox, volleyball court and horseshoe pits as needed;<br />
13. filling of holes in the Park as needed;<br />
14. checking grounds for glass, rocks — especially fitness trails;<br />
15. checking of nature trail and bridges for maintenance and repair;<br />
16. painting/staining of fitness stations, trash receptacles, shuffleboard courts, kiosk,<br />
benches, picnic tables, pavilion, picnic shelter, amphitheater, etc.;<br />
17. inspecting and repairing of all of the above;<br />
18. maintaining tennis courts & nets, basketball court & net, multi-purpose court & nets,<br />
volleyball court & net, soccer fields & nets;<br />
19. inspecting playground, water fountain and rest rooms daily;<br />
20. cleaning and waxing of slide;<br />
21. assisting in the maintenance of the schoolhouse;<br />
22. Keeping sidewalks and parking lots cleared of snow and ice at both buildings. Clear<br />
snow from parking lots at the GVFC station and,<br />
23. Assist the Road Department, if necessary.<br />
This position is to receive municipal building assignments from the <strong>Township</strong> Facilitator and<br />
park assignments from the <strong>Township</strong> Facilitator or the Parks and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader.<br />
Presently the <strong>Township</strong> has a new commercial tractor for park mowing, a smaller garden<br />
tractor and wagon and a variety of lawn/garden and general carpentry tools.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 10 - Chapter III – Community Background
Given the projected growth within the <strong>Township</strong> and the resulting need for additional<br />
scattered neighborhood parks, it is clear that additional maintenance staff will be<br />
required. It is unlikely that volunteer manpower will be able to meet the increasing<br />
needs for maintenance of the expanding park system. The <strong>Township</strong> should<br />
evaluate manpower needs as these new parks come on-line and make necessary<br />
manpower adjustments. The <strong>Township</strong> might also consider negotiating a<br />
maintenance agreement with the School District which likely is better prepared and<br />
equipped to maintain parks on a temporary or permanent basis. Of course the<br />
details would determine the feasibility of this approach. In the end the <strong>Township</strong><br />
must commit the manpower and resources to keep these parks functional, safe and<br />
attractive, whatever approach is selected. Fortunately along with growth will come<br />
additional tax and recreation fee revenues to help offset costs.<br />
With more maintenance staff comes the need for more detailed work tasks and<br />
directions. It is important that the <strong>Township</strong> clearly describe in detail those routine<br />
tasks that will be required to keep the parks in good condition. This should include<br />
a duty-roster of tasks to be completed at regular intervals (eg. daily, weekly,<br />
monthly, seasonally, annually, as needed, etc.) In addition, the maintenance staff<br />
needs to know what constitutes “good condition” for park maintenance. The<br />
<strong>Township</strong> should develop specific descriptions of standards-of-care for each park<br />
and its facilities so that all have the same expectations of what constitutes<br />
acceptable maintenance. These duties should be performed by the Park and<br />
<strong>Recreation</strong> Leader with help from an outside consultant, if required. The <strong>Township</strong><br />
might also look to the School District for help in developing the duty-roster and<br />
standards-of-care.<br />
E. <strong>Recreation</strong> Programs<br />
Despite the <strong>Township</strong>’s rural character, a generous number of recreation programs are<br />
offered for <strong>Township</strong> residents and non-residents.<br />
The largest single program is the Summer <strong>Recreation</strong> Program. This daily (M-F) offering<br />
runs ten weeks in May, June and July of each year. Preschool through 6 th grade children<br />
attend morning playground sessions at the <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park for organized crafts<br />
and sports activities. In addition, extended afternoon sessions are offered twice per week<br />
where participants went bowling and swimming this year. This year’s (2002) program<br />
required the hiring of 14 part-time summer employees to oversee all of the attendees.<br />
Other regularly-scheduled programs include:<br />
1. Toddler classes;<br />
2. Aerobics classes;<br />
3. Kickboxing;<br />
4. Mens basketball;<br />
5. Co-ed volleyball;<br />
6. Health & healing classes;<br />
7. CPR courses; and,<br />
8. Other occasional classes.<br />
Finally, the <strong>Township</strong> hosts a wide variety of special events each year as follows:<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 11 - Chapter III – Community Background
1. Pumpkin carving;<br />
2. Christmas tree lighting;<br />
3. Coloring contests;<br />
4. Window-painting contests;<br />
5. Halloween parade,<br />
6. Craft show;<br />
7. Breakfast with Santa;<br />
8. Breakfast with the <strong>East</strong>er Bunny;<br />
9. Valentines Day and Halloween dances for 6-8 th graders;<br />
10. Valentines Day party for preschoolers through elementary school;<br />
11. Indoor community yard sale;<br />
12. 2 outdoor community yard sales;<br />
13. memorial Day celebration,<br />
14. Peach Festival;<br />
15. Park day festival (the largest event of the year with about 2000 participants in<br />
2001);<br />
16. United Way’s Day of Caring; and,<br />
17. Join Hands Day.<br />
During the Year 2001, the fees collected for all of the <strong>Township</strong>’s programs totaled<br />
just over $13,000. <strong>Township</strong> staff indicates that these program fees are largely<br />
subsidized by general funds of the <strong>Township</strong>. Given the likely increasing demands<br />
for additional programs, staff and park maintenance, the <strong>Township</strong> should begin to<br />
charge fees that cover all of the costs associated with development and conduct of<br />
programs including the costs to provide and maintain the needed facilities. These<br />
fees should be determined by the Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader with input from<br />
maintenance personnel and outside experts if necessary. The <strong>Township</strong> cannot<br />
afford the luxury of subsidizing particular recreation programs at the expense of<br />
other system needs.<br />
F. Population & Housing Studies<br />
The allocation of municipal resources, including recreation, must consider the population to<br />
be served. Obviously, the overall size of a population is related to the amount of recreational<br />
services and parklands that must be provided. The historical growth pattern of an<br />
area provides insight as to the growth that might be expected in the future. The following<br />
graph and table lists the amount of population growth that has occurred over the last 30<br />
years within the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 12 - Chapter III – Community Background
Historic Population Growth<br />
8000<br />
7000<br />
6000<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
0<br />
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />
Population 2938 3574 4569 5322 6117 6912<br />
Year<br />
From the graph, it is easy to see that the <strong>Township</strong> has experienced steady growth since<br />
1970, at a rate of about 795 new inhabitants each decade. This has increased the<br />
population by about 81% in that time period. Based upon a continuation of this trend, the<br />
<strong>Township</strong>’s population will add approximately 1600 residents between 1990 and 2020.<br />
In addition to population growth, another important consideration when projecting how<br />
fast an area will grow relates to its number of housing units. The following graph and<br />
table lists the number of housing units within the <strong>Township</strong> since the US Census Bureau<br />
began reporting such information in 1970.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 13 - Chapter III – Community Background
Historic Housing Growth<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />
Housing Units 882 1344 1736 2043 2430 2817<br />
Year<br />
Unsurprisingly, the increase in the number of housing units exhibited similar growth<br />
trends as the population except at a faster rate. This difference is expected however,<br />
due to the decreasing family sizes occurring nationwide. Fewer people are living together<br />
as families, and more people are living by themselves. Overall, the <strong>Township</strong> has<br />
added about 387 new units each decade since 1970, representing a 175% increase over<br />
that entire period. This trend is expected to continue and will likely result in about 785 new<br />
dwelling units through 2020.<br />
By using a linear extrapolation technique applied to both population and housing stock<br />
trends since 1970, the following projections are derived; these will form the bases of future<br />
growth area and service needs for the <strong>Township</strong>:<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 14 - Chapter III – Community Background
8000<br />
7000<br />
6000<br />
5000<br />
4000<br />
3000<br />
2000<br />
1000<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong><br />
Historic & Projected Growth<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
Person/Unit<br />
0<br />
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />
Population 2938 3574 4569 5322 6117 6912<br />
Housing Units 882 1344 1736 2043 2430 2817<br />
Persons/Unit 3.33 2.66 2.63 2.6 2.52 2.45<br />
0<br />
The following tabulates socio-economic data that describes the <strong>Township</strong> that is<br />
available for the Year 2000 US Census of Population & Housing:<br />
Age Group<br />
Age Profile<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />
<strong>Township</strong><br />
Dauphin County<br />
Under 5 years 327 (6.1%) 6.2%<br />
5-9 years 417 (7.8%) 7.0%<br />
10-14 years 430 (8.1%) 7.1%<br />
15-19 years 380 (7.1%) 6.1%<br />
20-24 years 226 (4.2%) 5.4%<br />
25-64 years 3008 (56.5%) 54.0%<br />
65+ years 534 (10.0%) 14.2%<br />
Median age 38.1 years 37.9 years<br />
Comments<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has a higher<br />
percentage of youth through high school age<br />
and middle-age adults than does Dauphin<br />
County. However, it has fewer young adults &<br />
seniors. Overall, it has a slightly higher median<br />
age than all of Dauphin County. However,<br />
none of these differences present particular<br />
consequence for the <strong>Township</strong>’s delivery of<br />
parks and recreation. All of the age cohorts are<br />
represented and should be provided with<br />
opportunities to recreate and play.<br />
Gender<br />
Gender Profile<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />
<strong>Township</strong><br />
Dauphin County<br />
Male 2649 (49.8%) 48.0%<br />
Female 2673 (50.2%) 52.0%<br />
Comments<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has a more balanced<br />
ratio of males to females than does Dauphin<br />
County.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 15 - Chapter III – Community Background
Race<br />
Racial Composition & Latino Origin<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />
<strong>Township</strong><br />
Dauphin County<br />
White 5160 (97.0%) 77.1%<br />
African American 38 (0.7%) 16.9%<br />
Native American 7 (0.1%) 0.2%<br />
Asian 22 (0.4%) 2.0%<br />
Pacific Islander 0 (0%) 0%<br />
Other 37 (0.7%) 2.0%<br />
Multi-racial 58 (0.7%) 1.9%<br />
Hispanic/Latino 101 (1.9%) 4.1%<br />
Comments<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has less racial diversity<br />
than does Dauphin County. Only 2.6% of the<br />
<strong>Township</strong>’s residents describe themselves as<br />
other than “White.” African American, other and<br />
multi-racial groups comprise the <strong>Township</strong>’s<br />
minority population equally. Asians and Native<br />
Americans have comparably fewer<br />
representatives within the <strong>Township</strong>. Similarly,<br />
the <strong>Township</strong> has far fewer residents of<br />
Hispanic/Latino origin than Dauphin County.<br />
Educational Attainment for Persons 25+ Years<br />
Characteristic<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />
<strong>Township</strong><br />
Dauphin County<br />
Under 9th Grade 202 (5.7%) 4.6%<br />
High School Graduate 1455 (41.3%) 37.4%<br />
Associate Degree 268 (7.6%) 6.3%<br />
Bachelors + Degree 733 (20.8%) 23.5%<br />
Comments<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has a greater<br />
percentage of adults who never made it to high<br />
school than does the County as a whole. It<br />
also has fewer numbers of college graduates<br />
and post graduate students than Dauphin<br />
County in general. However, high school<br />
graduation rates within the <strong>Township</strong> and<br />
associate college degrees are more prevalent<br />
than in Dauphin County.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 16 - Chapter III – Community Background
IV. Facilities Inventory<br />
T<br />
he first step in a recreation analysis is an inventory of existing recreation facilities serving the<br />
<strong>Township</strong>’s residents. The inventory on the following pages is a series of tables which lists all<br />
identified recreation sites and their improvements. This inventory indicates the site name, the site's<br />
ownership and maintenance responsibilities, the site type, and its total recreation acreage.<br />
Following this is a specific list of recreation improvements at each site. This list is broken out under<br />
several major subheadings, including playgrounds, fields and courts, picnic facilities, pools, trails,<br />
and support facilities. A final section at the bottom of the table allows for comments concerning a<br />
particular site, or the listing of any additional improvements.<br />
The Parks Map on the following page utilizes the information from the inventory to illustrate the<br />
geographic distribution of all recreation sites within the <strong>Township</strong>, including their types, and<br />
service radii for public-owned facilities.<br />
Panoramic view of <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />
Panoramic view of <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 17 - Chapter IV – Facilities Inventory
Shady Ln.<br />
<strong>East</strong><br />
<strong>Hanover</strong><br />
<strong>Township</strong><br />
Parks<br />
Map<br />
July 5, 2002<br />
Appleby Rd.<br />
Mountain Rd.<br />
McLean Rd.<br />
Mountain Rd.<br />
Angle Rd.<br />
Penn Nartional Ballfield<br />
Fire House Rd.<br />
Manada Bottom Rd.<br />
Binkley's Miniature Golf<br />
Manada Gap Golf Course<br />
Golf Ln.<br />
Private Dr.<br />
Fox Run Rd.<br />
Fox Run Rd.<br />
Fire House Rd.<br />
Furnace Rd.<br />
Ridge Rd.<br />
Ridge Rd.<br />
Station Rd.<br />
I - 81 Ramp<br />
Grantville Fire Co. Carnival Grounds<br />
Bow Creek Rd.<br />
Manada Gap Rd.<br />
Short Dr.<br />
Moyer Rd.<br />
Cliff Rd.<br />
Rabbit Ln.<br />
Rabbit Ln.<br />
I - 81<br />
Dry Run Rd.<br />
Spring Rd.<br />
Faith United Church<br />
US Rt. 22<br />
Kelly Court<br />
North Faith Rd.<br />
N. Fairlane Rd.<br />
Shells Church Rd.<br />
Country Line Rd.<br />
Camp Kiwanis Rd.<br />
I - 81<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park<br />
Red Hill Rd.<br />
Jonestown Rd.<br />
VFW Picnic Grove<br />
San - Jo Dr.<br />
Hill Dr.<br />
US Rt. 22<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />
Laudermilch Rd.<br />
N. Crawford Dr.<br />
W<br />
N<br />
E<br />
Yellowstone Dr.<br />
Hunter Ln.<br />
Red Fox Lm.<br />
N. Mill Rd.<br />
N. Meadow Ln.<br />
Meadow Ln.<br />
Pheasant Rd.<br />
Timber Ridge Rd.<br />
Bunny Ln.<br />
Pheasant Rd.<br />
Dairy Ln.<br />
Sunflower Ln.<br />
Daisy Ln.<br />
Mill Rd.<br />
S<br />
Carter Dr.<br />
Carlson Rd.<br />
Early Mill Rd.<br />
Pineview Dr.<br />
Pine Rd.<br />
S. Crawford Rd.<br />
Parcels<br />
Roads<br />
<strong>Township</strong> Boundaries<br />
Streams<br />
Parks<br />
Community Park<br />
Neighborhood Park<br />
Private Park<br />
Neighborhood Park Service Area<br />
Community Park Service Area<br />
Devonshire Heights Rd.<br />
Sand Beach Rd.<br />
Trail Rd.<br />
Trail Rd.<br />
Amor Dr.<br />
Canal Rd.<br />
High Dr.<br />
Old Laudermilch Rd./ Rt. 743<br />
4000 0 4000 8000 Feet
FACILITIES INVENTORY<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
SITE NAME EHT Municipal Park Elementary School Carnival Grounds<br />
OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE <strong>Township</strong> Lower Dauphin School District Grantville Fire Company<br />
SITE TYPE Community Neighborhood Neighborhood<br />
SITE CONDITION Good Fair Fair<br />
TOTAL ACREAGE (DEVELOPED) 60 (30) 3.9 5.5 ±<br />
PLAYGROUNDS<br />
FIELDS & COURTS<br />
PICNIC<br />
TRAILS<br />
SUPPORT<br />
Swing Sets 1 (4) 1 (2) 1 broken, 2 (22) (10) + tire<br />
Sliding Boards 1 double dinosaur 1<br />
Climbing Equipment 11<br />
Tetherball 2<br />
Sandbox + diggers (2)<br />
Funnelball 1<br />
Rocking Toys<br />
Big Toys 1 1<br />
Hopscotch 1<br />
Four-Square 5<br />
Baseball/Softball Fields 1 w/backstop 2 softball<br />
Soccer/Hockey Fields 2<br />
Football Fields<br />
1 practice<br />
Basketball Courts (hoops) 1 2 need nets<br />
Tennis Courts 2<br />
Volleyball Courts sand 1 grass<br />
Bleachers<br />
Street Hockey<br />
Shuffleboard Courts 2<br />
<br />
Pavilions<br />
1 w/electric & rest rooms +<br />
1 shelter w/o electric & rest rooms<br />
1<br />
Total Picnic Tables (in pavilion) 18 (16) 2 (12)<br />
Barbecue Pits & Grills 3<br />
Benches 16 3<br />
Walking/Exercise Trails (length)<br />
Biking Trails (length)<br />
2/3 mile<br />
Fitness Trails (no. of stations) 1/3 mile (20)<br />
Measured Path<br />
Parking Spaces 2 lots <br />
Rest Rooms 1 portable 2 portable 2<br />
Water Fountains 1<br />
Snack Bar 1<br />
Waste Receptacles 10 5 20<br />
Bike Rack 2<br />
Signs<br />
Other/Comments<br />
park rules<br />
* restored one-room schoolhouse<br />
* amphitheater<br />
* multi-purpose court<br />
* horseshoe pits<br />
* open play area<br />
*indoor multi-purpose room &<br />
meeting rooms<br />
* nature trail<br />
<br />
* old mulch surfaces<br />
* batting cage<br />
* scoreboard<br />
* indoor gym & computer lab<br />
* <strong>Plan</strong>ned expansion: gym, stage,<br />
kitchen, conference room<br />
* bandshell<br />
* grass parking<br />
* arcade building<br />
* open play area w/2 bleachers<br />
* lighted carnival area with<br />
public address system<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 18 - Chapter IV – Facilities Inventory
FACILITIES INVENTORY<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
PLAYGROUNDS<br />
FIELDS & COURTS<br />
PICNIC<br />
TRAILS<br />
SUPPORT<br />
SITE NAME Shellsville VFW Picnic Area Manada Gap Golf Course Mountain Road Driving Range<br />
OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE<br />
VFW – Picnic Area<br />
Baseball Assn. – Ballfields<br />
Private<br />
Private<br />
SITE TYPE Private♦ Public Golf Course Private<br />
SITE CONDITION Good Good Good<br />
TOTAL ACREAGE (DEVELOPED) 38.8 (13±) N/A N/A<br />
Swing Sets 1 (8)<br />
Sliding Boards 1<br />
Climbing Equipment 1<br />
Tetherball<br />
Sandbox<br />
Funnelball<br />
Rocking Toys<br />
Big Toys<br />
Hopscotch<br />
Four-Square<br />
Baseball/Softball Fields<br />
2 w/bleachers & backstop♦<br />
1 w/benches & backstop<br />
Soccer/Hockey Fields<br />
Football Fields<br />
Basketball Courts (hoops)<br />
Tennis Courts<br />
Volleyball Courts 1<br />
Bleachers<br />
Street Hockey<br />
Shuffleboard Courts<br />
Pavilions 3, 1 lighted 1<br />
Total Picnic Tables (in pavilion) 98 (44) 18 4<br />
Barbecue Pits & Grills 1 1<br />
Benches 1<br />
Walking/Exercise Trails (length)<br />
Biking Trails (length)<br />
Fitness Trails (no. of stations)<br />
Measured Path<br />
Parking Spaces <br />
Rest Rooms 2<br />
Water Fountains<br />
Snack Bar 3 1<br />
Waste Receptacles 26 10 2<br />
Bike Rack<br />
Signs<br />
Other/Comments<br />
* creekside<br />
* open play area<br />
* batting cage<br />
* rusty scoreboard<br />
* bandshell<br />
* 2 horseshoe courses<br />
♦These fields directly adjoin the <strong>East</strong><br />
<strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School and are<br />
made available for public use.<br />
* pro shop<br />
* 18-hole golf course<br />
* miniature golf course<br />
* driving range<br />
* batting cages<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 19 - Chapter IV – Facilities Inventory
FACILITIES INVENTORY<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
PLAYGROUNDS<br />
FIELDS & COURTS<br />
PICNIC<br />
TRAILS<br />
SUPPORT<br />
SITE NAME Faith United Church Penn National Ballfield Chesapeake Mobile Home Park<br />
OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE Private Private Private<br />
SITE TYPE Private Private Private<br />
SITE CONDITION Fair Overgrown Poor<br />
TOTAL ACREAGE (DEVELOPED) N/A N/A 0.17<br />
Swing Sets 1 (4) 2 (6)<br />
Sliding Boards 1 2<br />
Climbing Equipment 2 2<br />
Tetherball<br />
Sandbox<br />
Funnelball<br />
Rocking Toys 2<br />
Big Toys<br />
Hopscotch<br />
Four-Square<br />
Baseball/Softball Fields<br />
Soccer/Hockey Fields<br />
Football Fields<br />
1, overgrown<br />
Basketball Courts (hoops) (1) (1)<br />
Tennis Courts<br />
Volleyball Courts<br />
Bleachers<br />
Street Hockey<br />
Shuffleboard Courts<br />
Pavilions 1<br />
Total Picnic Tables (in pavilion) (8)<br />
Barbecue Pits & Grills<br />
Benches<br />
Walking/Exercise Trails (length)<br />
Biking Trails (length)<br />
Fitness Trails (no. of stations)<br />
Measured Path<br />
Parking Spaces<br />
Rest Rooms<br />
Water Fountains<br />
Snack Bar<br />
Waste Receptacles<br />
Bike Rack<br />
Signs<br />
Other/Comments<br />
* open play area w/backstop<br />
* safety surfaces at playground<br />
* small backstop<br />
* rusty scoreboard<br />
* overgrown<br />
* overflowing trash can<br />
* no benches/parking<br />
* no shade<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 20 - Chapter IV – Facilities Inventory
V. Park Analysis & Recommendations<br />
W<br />
ith a complete inventory of parks, it becomes possible to analyze the level of park service<br />
available within <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong>. Within this analysis, every publicly-owned park<br />
and/or recreation facility (<strong>Township</strong> and School District) is identified. Then, its size and service<br />
area is evaluated in relation to its intended service population. Conversely, this analysis also<br />
identifies those areas that lack close, convenient, and safe access to public parkland. Typically,<br />
these evaluations are based upon prescribed standards for park size per 1,000 persons being<br />
served and also for predetermined service radii. The National <strong>Recreation</strong> and Park Association<br />
(NRPA) recommends such standards for various park types that will be applied to evaluate the<br />
allocation and spatial distribution of <strong>Township</strong>’s park system.<br />
Regional parks generally contain 200± acres and are typically located within one hour’s<br />
driving time from the population being served. These parks are generally located throughout a<br />
large metropolitan region, and can accommodate a wide variety of recreational activities. Often,<br />
these parks are owned and operated by the State and Federal government, and in the case of<br />
Pennsylvania, many State Game Lands are included in this category. Regional parks usually have<br />
a natural orientation with hiking, camping, and picnicking facilities. Other “activity-oriented” facilities,<br />
as well as significant historic or archaeological resources, might also be included.<br />
Within Dauphin and Lebanon Counties, several public organizations and private enterprises are<br />
involved with the provision of regional recreation facilities. Within the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> the<br />
northern half is part of the 17,000 acres of the Fort Indiantown Gap which is committed to<br />
environmental stewardship and nature-based recreation opportunities. The following table lists<br />
regional parks within Dauphin and Lebanon Counties.<br />
Regional Parks Serving <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong><br />
Park Ownership<br />
Acres<br />
Dauphin County Parks Department 247+<br />
PA State Game Lands 71,569<br />
Fort Indiantown Gap 17,000<br />
Because the size and cost usually associated with regional parks transcend the responsibilities<br />
of local government, this <strong>Plan</strong> does not recommend any specific actions associated with the<br />
acquisition and development of more regional parks. Instead, this <strong>Plan</strong> will focus upon the<br />
remaining park types that typically are the responsibility of local agencies to provide and<br />
operate.<br />
Community parks usually contain 20± acres and are intended to serve a population within a<br />
2 mile-service radius. They should be sized at the rate of 5 to 8 acres for 1,000 persons served.<br />
These parks generally involve a fairly high level of improvement with multiple sets of athletic fields<br />
and courts. Sometimes swimming pools and indoor recreation centers are situated on these<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 21 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
community-wide parks. Larger school sites (usually middle, and high schools) have the facilities to<br />
qualify as community-based parks, and represent valuable recreation resources that can<br />
significantly enhance the level of recreation services offered to a given area. Finally, sometimes<br />
smaller specialized facilities qualify as community parks due to their use by a larger service area<br />
than that of a neighborhood park.<br />
The <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park is the only community park within the <strong>Township</strong>. This<br />
60-acre park has been the <strong>Township</strong>’s obvious recreation priority over the last decade. About 30<br />
acres is highly developed with a wide variety of active and passive features. It also exhibits<br />
excellent maintenance and care. <strong>Township</strong> residents can surely be proud of this exemplary park<br />
which was partially funded using state grant monies.<br />
Panoramic view of <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park<br />
The Parks Map, following page 17, illustrates the locations and configuration of this community<br />
park in the northwest quadrant of Jonestown and Manada Gap Roads. Additionally, its two-mile<br />
service radius is depicted that blankets most of the <strong>Township</strong>’s “developable” southern half. The<br />
northern half of the <strong>Township</strong> is largely undevelopable due to public ownership, environmental<br />
sensitivity and restrictive zoning.<br />
Next, local officials need to know how much additional community parkland is needed to meet<br />
future demand. Based upon the NRPA guideline of 5 to 8 acres of community parkland for each<br />
1,000 residents and the population projections provided in Chapter III of this <strong>Plan</strong>, the table below<br />
illustrates the community parkland area needed to adequately serve the <strong>Township</strong> now and in the<br />
projected future:<br />
Existing & Projected Community Parkland Needed Within the <strong>Township</strong><br />
NRPA-Recommended Acres<br />
Year Population 5 ac. per 1000<br />
persons<br />
8 ac. per 1000<br />
persons<br />
Existing<br />
Acres<br />
Projected<br />
Surplus<br />
2000 5,322 26.6 42.6 60 +33.4 to +17.4<br />
2010 6,117 30.6 48.9 60 +29.4 to +11.1<br />
2020 6,912 34.6 55.3 60 +25.4 to +4.7<br />
From the preceding table, it is obvious that the <strong>Township</strong> already enjoys a wealth of community<br />
parklands well in excess of the NRPA-recommended minimum standards now and in the<br />
foreseeable future. Furthermore this park’s central geographic location enables it to serve most<br />
of the <strong>Township</strong>’s developing neighborhoods within the recommended 2-mile service radius.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 22 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
The previous acquisition and development of this park will enable the <strong>Township</strong> to focus its<br />
revenues and efforts upon other needed facilities throughout the <strong>Township</strong> in the future.<br />
EHT Municipal Park<br />
Shellsville VFW Picnic Grove<br />
Elementary School<br />
The <strong>Township</strong> should further enhance access to this park that is less reliant upon vehicle<br />
traffic by linking with the <strong>Township</strong>’s planned growth neighborhoods. Specifically, as<br />
depicted on the above aerial photograph, this park is located close to the Shellsville VFW Picnic<br />
Grove and <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School. The VFW property comes within about 250 feet of<br />
the <strong>Township</strong> property across Jonestown Road and one row of houses. From there, a riparian<br />
buffer park/trail could be developed to link to the Elementary School and offer recreational and<br />
educational benefits along the way. According to the Principal at the Elementary School, the<br />
students already explore nature on this site as part of their science curriculum. More about this<br />
subject will be presented in the linear parks section of this <strong>Plan</strong> contained on pages 32-33.<br />
Today it appears that this park offers recreation amenity beyond local demand. The rural<br />
character of the <strong>Township</strong> has yet to produce park users in excess of current facilities; however,<br />
this will change. For the time being <strong>Township</strong> officials do not want to undertake another<br />
campaign of development on the 30 acres of parkland that remains undeveloped.<br />
Instead, they intend to keep these areas in a natural open condition which can be used<br />
informally as open play and practice areas. For these reasons, it is recommended that<br />
future improvements to this park be limited to providing for electricity and lighting<br />
throughout the park. Electricity will enable the amphitheater to offer attractions that require<br />
amplified sound and lighting. Similarly, lighting of the <strong>Township</strong>’s park will enable more efficient<br />
use of the existing facilities without the need for parkland expansion and development. It is<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 23 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
estimated that this project will cost $150,000 which can be entirely funded through mandatory<br />
dedication revenues. At some point in the distant future, the <strong>Township</strong> will likely be<br />
confronted with increased demand for community park facilities and programs from an<br />
enlarged population. At that time an assessment of the, then, prevailing recreation<br />
preferences should guide future development of this site.<br />
Beyond these improvements the following table identifies safety and/or maintenance-related<br />
repairs needed at this site as observed on July 13, 2002:<br />
Safety and Maintenance-Related Improvements Needed to EHT Municipal Park<br />
Item Cost Notes<br />
Repair to Gamefield Holy Spirit Jogging Course<br />
Fasten decking on the footbridge between jogging course station. #7<br />
and #8; repair/replace the broke storm water pipe between station<br />
#12 and #13.<br />
Replace broken molding, repair splintered seat board, and attach<br />
loose ramp deck at gazebo adjacent to school house.<br />
Start a turf maintenance program that includes aeration, fertilizing,<br />
$3000<br />
$200<br />
$100<br />
$2000 - $3000<br />
per year<br />
over seeding and selective weed control at 2 small soccer fields.<br />
Install two new rims and nets at basketball courts. $200<br />
Firmly secure the railings on back of the deck of amphitheater.<br />
$100<br />
Relocate starting and ending points of the nature trail on the south<br />
side of the stream where the best path and most of the stations are<br />
$0<br />
located.<br />
Paint rusted metal parts of older composite playground structure. $100<br />
Mulch surfacing should be routinely raked to maintain adequate<br />
surfacing under all play equipment, eliminate compaction and weed<br />
growth. Additional wood mulch should be added to the play areas.<br />
Remove old swing set next to maintenance building and restore turf. $300<br />
Turf restoration to soccer field including selective weed control,<br />
topdressing, seeding and fertilizing. This should be followed by an<br />
aggressive maintenance program including aeration, fertilizing and<br />
over seeding.<br />
Minor repairs needed to the fencing and seating at baseball diamond.<br />
Routine maintenance is needed to the batting cage area and<br />
improved housekeeping around the backstop area.<br />
The baseball diamond should receive an annual turf maintenance<br />
program including aeration, fertilizing and over seeding.<br />
Construct handicapped parking area and route to the spectator area<br />
for baseball and soccer fields.<br />
Designate the handicapped parking on either side of the access to the<br />
pavilion. Change the water fountain and renovate at least one of the<br />
rest rooms to make it handicapped accessible.<br />
Assumes old signs have been<br />
saved and repairs are<br />
provided by maintenance staff<br />
Performed by maintenance<br />
staff.<br />
Performed as part of<br />
volunteer Day of Caring<br />
$500 For added mulch<br />
Estimated cost<br />
of restoration:<br />
$5,000–7,000<br />
$100<br />
Annual Maintenance: $2,000<br />
$2000-$3000 Annual Maintenance: $2,000<br />
$8000-$10,000<br />
$3000-$5000<br />
Total Safety & Maintenance-Related Costs $32,600<br />
The <strong>Township</strong> should undertake the above repair tasks as a high priority, plus develop<br />
annual maintenance procedures that address the other repairs that occur on an ongoing<br />
basis. Often, local officials can coordinate volunteer efforts among various civic groups<br />
to undertake needed repairs and improvements. Local citizens are generally much more<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 24 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
willing to help fix-up parks than they are to perform other maintenance duties (e.g.,<br />
roads, sewers, etc.). These valuable resources should be explored before the <strong>Township</strong><br />
diverts its maintenance staff from other duties.<br />
Neighborhood parks are the third park type advocated by recreation experts. These parks<br />
are generally between 1 and 20 acres in size and meant to serve a population of 2,000 to 10,000.<br />
The recommended service area for these parks is a one-quarter to one-half mile radius. As implied<br />
by the name, these parks are intended to provide close-to-home areas for limited athletic activities,<br />
playgrounds, and passive pursuits. The NRPA recommends that one to two acres of publiclyowned<br />
land be devoted to neighborhood parks for each 1,000 residents.<br />
Like for community parks, local officials need to know how much neighborhood parkland is needed<br />
to meet current and future demand. Based upon the population projections for the <strong>Township</strong>, the<br />
table below illustrates the neighborhood parkland area needed to adequately serve projected<br />
growth:<br />
Existing & Projected Neighborhood Parkland Needed Within the <strong>Township</strong><br />
NRPA-Recommended Acres<br />
Year Population<br />
1 ac. per 1000 persons 2 ac. per 1000 persons<br />
Existing<br />
Acres<br />
Projected<br />
Surplus/Deficit<br />
2000 5,322 5.3 10.6 13.8 +8.5 to +3.2<br />
2010 6,117 6.1 12.2 13.8 +7.7 to + 1.6<br />
2020 6,912 6.9 13.8 13.8 +6.9 to 0<br />
From an acreage standpoint the <strong>Township</strong> has an adequate amount of neighborhood parkland<br />
now and in the projected future. However in the case of neighborhood parkland, its geographic<br />
location is equally important as its size.<br />
Neighborhood parks must be conveniently accessible by foot to intended users. Based upon:<br />
1. the goals of this plan to focus public facilities and services within planned development<br />
neighborhoods: and,<br />
2. the <strong>Township</strong>’s Zoning Map which depicts a large band of development stretching between<br />
Shellsville on the west to Grantville on the east,<br />
The <strong>Township</strong> should consider 5 different neighborhood park planning areas as follows:<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 25 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
Golf Ln.<br />
Ridge Rd.<br />
Fox Run Rd.<br />
Fire House Rd.<br />
Chesapeake MHP<br />
Station Rd.<br />
I - 81 Ramp<br />
Bow Creek Rd.<br />
Grantville<br />
Manada Gap Rd.<br />
Short Dr.<br />
I - 81<br />
Dry Run Rd.<br />
Jonestown Rd.<br />
Shells Church Rd.<br />
Shellsville<br />
San - Jo Dr.<br />
Hill Dr.<br />
Spring Rd.<br />
Northern Link<br />
US Rt. 22<br />
US Rt. 22<br />
Kelly Court<br />
Southern Link<br />
North Faith Rd.<br />
Country Line Rd.<br />
Laudermilch Rd.<br />
N. Crawford Dr<br />
Pheasant Rd.<br />
Bunny Ln.<br />
Dai<br />
Shellsville Neighborhood<br />
Panoramic view of <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />
The <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School is located in the northwest corner of the intersection of San-<br />
Jo Drive and Shellsville Church Road. This public school is owned and operated by the Lower<br />
Dauphin School District. It has been meeting the needs of school-aged children for decades as<br />
described in the Historical Sketch found on page 6 of this <strong>Plan</strong>. Today this school site has about<br />
3.9 acres devoted to park use. It has youth-oriented playground equipment, two baseball fields, a<br />
football field and a basketball court. Some limited indoor facilities are also available.<br />
It is also important to note that 3 baseball/softball fields that are part of the adjoining Shellsville<br />
VFW Picnic Grove function as part of this park. The VFW has just renewed a 25-year lease with<br />
the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Softball and Baseball Association for their use and maintenance of these fields<br />
through the end of year 2025. Improvements to these fields have been furnished by the<br />
Association with permission by the VFW. Access to these fields occurs across the school property<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 26 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
since the VFW’s driveway is nearly ¼ mile to the west along Crawford Road. The public use of<br />
these ballfields adds another 4.4 acres to this site; this brings the effective size of this park to 8.3<br />
acres.<br />
In addition to student use, the school enables “others” to reserve use of the facilities for various<br />
recreation activities and programs. The School Principal schedules extra-curricular use of the<br />
facilities at minimal fees according to established policies (Policy 707, See Appendix A of this <strong>Plan</strong>)<br />
of the School District. During the 2001 calendar year the following groups made regular use of the<br />
Elementary School:<br />
Group<br />
Fees Paid To<br />
School District<br />
Notes<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Baseball Association $0 Responsible for maintenance of all<br />
infields.<br />
Winter girls basketball league $0<br />
<strong>Township</strong> aerobics classes<br />
<strong>Township</strong> volleyball<br />
<strong>Township</strong> basketball<br />
$160/yr.<br />
$15/yr.<br />
$15/yr.<br />
Local youth soccer $0<br />
The District has finalized plans for renovation and expansion of this School to begin at the end of<br />
the 2002-2003 school year. This project will likely take two years to complete. Presently the plans<br />
depict the addition of a new indoor gymnasium, stage, kitchen and conference room. To<br />
accommodate these new facilities the southern playground area will be relocated or removed<br />
altogether. Given the developed status of this park and its impending improvement, no specific<br />
recommendations are offered for new park amenities at this time. Instead the School District<br />
should focus upon needed repairs and maintenance.<br />
The following table identifies needed safety and/or maintenance-related improvements needed at<br />
this site as observed on July 13, 2002:<br />
Safety and Maintenance-Related Improvements Needed<br />
to <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />
Item Cost Notes<br />
If the school desires to maintain the existing playground equipment,<br />
then a thorough inspection of the equipment should be complete by a<br />
Certified Playground Safety Inspector and the resulting recommended<br />
$1,000 to $1,500.<br />
remediation completed.<br />
Install a border and 12 inches of playground mulch under and around<br />
all play equipment that extends at least 6 feet beyond all equipment.<br />
Surfacing for swings should extend both in front and behind the<br />
suspended seat at least 2 times both the distance measured from the<br />
swing seat to the top bar.<br />
$15,000-$20,000<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 27 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
Safety and Maintenance-Related Improvements Needed<br />
to <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />
Item Cost Notes<br />
If the school believes that the playground equipment contains lead<br />
paint then testing and appropriate remediation should take place. If<br />
the play equipment coatings do not contain lead paint it is still $500<br />
important to have the equipment cleaned and repainted to prevent<br />
deterioration of the metal.<br />
The turf areas of the various athletic fields need an annual turf<br />
maintenance program that includes aeration, fertilization and over<br />
Annual expense: $7,000<br />
Turf restoration<br />
seeding. Significant work is required to the football/soccer field to<br />
to $10,000<br />
$2000-$3000<br />
restore the turf. The skinned infields require routine dragging in order<br />
to prevent growth of vegetation.<br />
Total Safety and Maintenance-Related Costs $25,000<br />
The 1/2-mile neighborhood park service radius that extends from the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary<br />
School and the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park blanket the Village of Shellsville and its<br />
surroundings. These facilities provide for more than ample convenient access to neighborhood<br />
parks in this locale, particularly when one considers the rural character of these areas. It is<br />
estimated that some 588 residents live within the neighborhood service areas for these two parks.<br />
At the NRPA standard, these residents would demand 0.6 to 1.2 areas of neighborhood parkland.<br />
Clearly the <strong>Township</strong> and School District have provided a high level of parks (8.3 acres) within this<br />
vicinity in advance of resident demand. For these reasons it is not recommended that the<br />
<strong>Township</strong> look to acquire additional neighborhood parkland in and around the Village of<br />
Shellsville until such time as its population grows to more than 4000. Instead the <strong>Township</strong><br />
should look to link these parks via the proposed Village Link Trail and make repairs to the<br />
school and VFW ballfields that improve service. This may mean that revenues collected by<br />
the <strong>Township</strong> would be provided to the School District/VFW to improve the facility. It is<br />
noted that the <strong>Township</strong> is currently cooperating with the School District in the preparation of a<br />
Regional Comprehensive <strong>Plan</strong>. It is likely that such financial cooperation will also be a<br />
recommendation from that effort as neighboring municipalities and the School District look to<br />
improve services and reduce the costs of duplication.<br />
Northern Link Neighborhood<br />
The second neighborhood is located between Shellsville to the west and Grantville on the east. It<br />
is also sandwiched between Jonestown Road on the north and commercial uses fronting US Route<br />
22 on the south. This planned neighborhood is largely undeveloped at this time with approximately<br />
78 residents. However, the zoning for this area would accommodate about 3000 new residents at<br />
full buildout under the <strong>Township</strong>’s Village Overlay Zone. This would generate an ultimate<br />
neighborhood park size of 6 acres assuming the NRPA’s 2-acres per 1000 population<br />
standard. The <strong>Township</strong> should acquire land via mandatory dedication for these acres and<br />
also collect fees-in-lieu thereof to be applied to this neighborhood park’s development. In<br />
addition, the <strong>Township</strong> should also use the mandatory dedication process to acquire a<br />
linear park to connect Shellsville and Grantville through this neighborhood. This linear<br />
park should be a design priority expressed to any would-be developer in this neighborhood<br />
early in their land development review process so that they can make use of the <strong>Township</strong>’s<br />
flexible design options to incorporate this feature amid the proposed development. The<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 28 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
following presents a typical schedule of improvements associated with this proposed<br />
neighborhood park:<br />
“Typical” 6-Acre Neighborhood Park Improvements<br />
1. 6-acre neighborhood park;<br />
2. a multi-purpose (soccer/baseball) athletic field;<br />
3. a modular playground with safety surfaces;<br />
4. 6-table picnic pavilion/tables/BBQ grills/waste receptacles;<br />
5. 20-space parking lot;<br />
6. 2 basketball courts;<br />
7. 1 sand volleyball court;<br />
8. 8 park benches;<br />
9. bike rack;<br />
10. landscaping and shade trees;<br />
11. park sign;<br />
12. contingency, bonding, and design costs (20% of improvement costs)<br />
Total Improvement Costs<br />
Estimated Cost<br />
$240,0000<br />
$48,000<br />
$30,000<br />
$8,100<br />
$19,140<br />
$75,200<br />
$8,000<br />
$4,000<br />
$500<br />
$16,000<br />
$4,000<br />
$42,588<br />
$495,528<br />
Southern Link Neighborhood<br />
The third neighborhood is separated from the others within the <strong>Township</strong> by US Route 22.<br />
Specifically this area is situated on the west side of Laudermilch Road south of commercial<br />
properties fronting the highway. This neighborhood acknowledges a recently proposed “Preserve<br />
at Bow Creek” development of up to 162 dwelling units on 122 acres under the <strong>Township</strong>’s former<br />
cluster development zoning provisions. The clustering provisions require generous amounts of<br />
open space; therefore, the applicant should have little difficulty providing the needed 1-acre<br />
neighborhood park for this area. In fact, the <strong>Township</strong> should attempt to collect fees-in-lieu of land<br />
in this development so as to provide for adequate improvements to the raw acreage. Other monies<br />
collected in the nearby rural areas of the <strong>Township</strong> could also be applied to help fund development<br />
of this site. The following presents a typical schedule of improvements associated with this<br />
proposed neighborhood park:<br />
“Typical” 1- Acre Neighborhood Park Improvements<br />
1. 1-acre neighborhood park;<br />
2. a modular playground with safety surfaces;<br />
3. 6-table picnic pavilion/tables/BBQ grills/waste receptacles;<br />
4. 1 basketball courts;<br />
5. 1 sand volleyball court;<br />
6. 4 park benches;<br />
7. bike rack;<br />
8. landscaping and shade trees;<br />
9. park sign;<br />
10. contingency, bonding, and design costs (20% of improvement costs)<br />
Total Improvement Costs<br />
Estimated Cost<br />
$0, required under cluster ordinance<br />
$30,000<br />
$8,100<br />
$40,000<br />
$8,000<br />
$2,000<br />
$500<br />
$2500<br />
$1,000<br />
$18,420<br />
$110,520<br />
Grantville Neighborhood<br />
This neighborhood is anchored by the Village of Grantville and extends from Interstate 81 on the<br />
north and commercial properties fronting US Route 22 on the south. Today, this neighborhood<br />
houses about 275 residents; however, its combination of Village Residential and Residential<br />
Medium Density zoning could swell this population to about 2050 with full buildout under the Village<br />
Overlay Zone. Today, this neighborhood should have a neighborhood park with the minimum 1-<br />
acre as recommended by the NRPA. At full buildout, it should have a 4.1-acre neighborhood park.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 29 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
The Grantville Fire Company’s Carnival<br />
Grounds are located here. This 5.5-acre site<br />
has a rich history within the <strong>Township</strong> that<br />
dates back to the late 1940’s when the first<br />
town carnivals were held. This park is located<br />
on the west side of Firehouse Road just north<br />
of the Grantville Post Office. While this park<br />
satisfies the criteria for a neighborhood park it<br />
doesn’t really function in that capacity at the<br />
same level as the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary<br />
School. To the contrary, this park is more<br />
typical to rural communities where parks and<br />
recreation are not a priority. Here some<br />
limited playground facilities and two basketball<br />
hoops offer some amenity and a large open Bandshell at Carnival Grounds<br />
play area can be used for informal pick-up games. But this site’s primary function is to serve the<br />
summer carnival. A ½-acre lighted carnival area is bounded on one side by the bandshell shown in<br />
the adjoining photograph and an arcade-stand style building on the other from which vendors and<br />
amusements operate. Presumably the open play area is used for parking during the carnival. A<br />
small picnic pavilion and rest rooms are also available on the site.<br />
The <strong>Township</strong> should focus on acquiring land via mandatory dedication for a new<br />
neighborhood park amid a proposed development. It should be centrally located,<br />
preferably just north of the existing Village so as to provide maximum pedestrian<br />
accessibility to existing and future residents. Fees-in-lieu thereof should also be applied to<br />
this neighborhood park’s development. In addition, the <strong>Township</strong> should also use the<br />
mandatory dedication process to acquire a linear park to connect this neighborhood with<br />
the proposed linear park from the Northern Link and Shellsville neighborhoods. This linear<br />
park should be a design priority expressed to any would-be developer in this neighborhood<br />
early in their land development review process so that they can make use of the <strong>Township</strong>’s<br />
flexible design options to incorporate this feature amid the proposed development. The<br />
following presents a typical schedule of improvements associated with this proposed<br />
neighborhood park:<br />
“Typical” 4-Acre Neighborhood Park Improvements<br />
1. 4.1-acre neighborhood park;<br />
2. a multi-purpose (soccer/baseball) athletic field;<br />
3. a modular playground with safety surfaces;<br />
4. 6-table picnic pavilion/tables/BBQ grills/waste receptacles;<br />
5. 20-space parking lot;<br />
6. 2 basketball courts;<br />
7. 1 sand volleyball court;<br />
8. 8 park benches;<br />
9. bike rack;<br />
10. landscaping and shade trees;<br />
11. park sign;<br />
12. contingency, bonding, and design costs (20% of improvement costs)<br />
Total Improvement Costs<br />
Estimated Cost<br />
$164,000<br />
$48,000<br />
$30,000<br />
$8,100<br />
$19,140<br />
$75,200<br />
$8,000<br />
$4,000<br />
$500<br />
$16,000<br />
$4,000<br />
$42,588<br />
$419,528<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 30 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
Chesapeake MHP Neighborhood<br />
A final neighborhood is located on the northeast quadrant of the Interstate 81 interchange at<br />
Grantville. Here a large mobile home park has existed for many years. Today, there are about 360<br />
units resulting in a population of about 936. Consequently this neighborhood should be fitted with a<br />
1.9-acre neighborhood park in the near future. It is noted that the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Mobile<br />
Home Park Ordinance requires that a minimum of 200 square feet of recreation area be provided<br />
for each mobile home; this would generate about 1.65 acres of parkland. However, the play area<br />
depicted on the mobile home park’s development plan only depicts 0.17 acres devoted to play<br />
area. Consequently, this neighborhood suffers a 1.7-acre deficit today. Furthermore, the residual<br />
development of this neighborhood in this neighborhood is estimated to accommodate an additional<br />
500 mobile homes at full buildout. This would require an ultimate neighborhood park size of 4.5<br />
acres. The <strong>Township</strong> should provide for a 1.9-acre developed neighborhood park in the<br />
short term. Then, when future expansion plans occur, the developer should be required to<br />
enlarge the park accordingly under Section 6.6 of the <strong>Township</strong> Mobile Home Park<br />
Ordinance. At that time, the fee-in-lieu of mandatory dedication should be used to equip this<br />
expanded park with needed additional improvements.<br />
“Typical” 1.9- Acre Neighborhood Park Improvements<br />
1. 1.9-acre neighborhood park;<br />
2. a modular playground with safety surfaces;<br />
3. 6-table picnic pavilion/tables/BBQ grills/waste receptacles;<br />
4. 1 basketball courts;<br />
5. 1 sand volleyball court;<br />
6. 4 park benches;<br />
7. bike rack;<br />
8. landscaping and shade trees;<br />
9. park sign;<br />
10. contingency, bonding, and design costs (20% of improvement costs)<br />
Total Improvement Costs<br />
Estimated Cost<br />
$76,000<br />
$30,000<br />
$8,100<br />
$40,000<br />
$8,000<br />
$2,000<br />
$500<br />
$2500<br />
$1,000<br />
$18,420<br />
$186,520<br />
Linear parks are also gaining in popularity throughout the nation as less and less open<br />
space remains within developing areas. The <strong>Township</strong> has an abundance of existing and<br />
planned linear parks. The following will discuss each linear park separately.<br />
Appalachian Trail - As depicted on the Parks Map found following page 17, the Appalachian<br />
Trail traverses the <strong>Township</strong> along its entire length of 2160 miles from Katahdin, Maine to<br />
Springer Mountain, Georgia. This trail is one of the nation’s longest and oldest continuously<br />
marked footpaths that is believed to have originated sometime around 1921. Locally the trail<br />
follows an overland path in a northwest/southeast direction just under 1 mile. It is entirely upon<br />
lands of the Fort Indiantown Gap and connects with the Horseshoe Trail about midway across<br />
the <strong>Township</strong>. Although the trail is located within the <strong>Township</strong>, pedestrian access is not<br />
immediately available within <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong>. Instead hikers must access the trail in<br />
adjoining Middle Paxton <strong>Township</strong> via the Horseshoe Trail. <strong>Township</strong> Officials should monitor<br />
activities of the Appalachian Trail Conference and cooperate with their initiatives. More<br />
information can be found at their homepage at the following Internet address:<br />
http://www.fred.net/kathy/at.html<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 31 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
Horseshoe Trail – The <strong>Township</strong> is fortunate to have a trailhead of the Horseshoe Trail on<br />
Stony Mountain along its northern ridge. This 121-mile trail extends to Valley Forge. The trail<br />
begins about 1.2 miles east of the <strong>Township</strong>’s western boundary and follows the Appalachian<br />
Trail west into adjoining Middle Paxton<br />
<strong>Township</strong>. It re-enters <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />
<strong>Township</strong> upon the Fort Indiantown<br />
Gap property and follows an overland<br />
course to Mountain Road. Here the<br />
trail follows:<br />
• Mountain Road to Ridge Road;<br />
• Ridge Road to Cliff Road;<br />
• Cliff Road to Rabbit Lane;<br />
• Rabbit Lane to Jonestown Road;<br />
• Jonestown Road to North Mill Road;<br />
• North Mill Road to Carson Road;<br />
• Carson Road to Sand Beach Road;<br />
• Sand Beach Road to Early Mill Road;<br />
• Early Mill Road to Trail Road; and,<br />
• Trail Road to Canal Road where it exits<br />
the <strong>Township</strong> on the south.<br />
Local Horseshoe Trail Alignment<br />
Local officials within the <strong>Township</strong> should seek ways to<br />
protect and incorporate this valuable resource within its<br />
overall park and open space system and programs.<br />
Development plans proposed along this trail should<br />
seek to relocate the trail away from the road and provide<br />
the overland alignment by designing developments that<br />
respect its integrity and use. Density bonuses through<br />
zoning and cluster developments can be used to<br />
incentivize this process. More information about the<br />
Horseshoe Trail monument<br />
Horseshoe Trail can be found at the following website:<br />
to founder Henry N. Wollman<br />
http://www.n99.com/hst/index.html<br />
in Valley Forge at trailhead.<br />
PA State Gamelands No. 211 Abandoned Railroad R.O.W. – An abandoned railroad right-ofway<br />
passes through the <strong>Township</strong> within Stony Valley along the Stony Creek. This public trail<br />
originates at Stony Creek Road in Middle Paxton <strong>Township</strong> near Dauphin Borough in Dauphin<br />
County. The trail extends some 17 miles (3 miles within <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong>) to the west<br />
where it terminates along Gold Mine Road in Cold Spring <strong>Township</strong>, Lebanon County. A mid<br />
access point is also available at Cold Springs Road at the Fort Indiantown Gap. One day in the fall<br />
(usually the second Sunday in October) the Game Commission permits motorized vehicles to use<br />
the trail for its “Gamelands Tour” to view the fall foliage; otherwise the trail is for pedestrians,<br />
mountain bikes and horseback riders. The motorized tour is a one-way trip from west to east and<br />
is advertised in local newspapers a few weeks prior to the event. This trail passes along the Devil’s<br />
Race Course and Rattling Run, two scenic geologic features important within the Region.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 32 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
Proposed Village Link Trail – The <strong>Township</strong> hopes to develop a new Village Link Trail that would<br />
from west to east:<br />
• Connect to the Horseshoe Trail at North Mill Road;<br />
• Follow Jonestown Road to the <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park;<br />
• Turn south onto Crawford Road and enter the Shellsville VFW Picnic Grove;<br />
• Establish a riparian buffer trail along the creek on the VFW site;<br />
• Connect with the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School;<br />
• Integrate with new neighborhoods to be developed between Shellsville and Grantville;<br />
• Link to the new neighborhood park to be located within the Northern Link neighborhood;<br />
• Continue into Grantville and provide access to the Grantville Fire Company Carnival Grounds;<br />
• Terminate at the new neighborhood park to be built within the Village of Grantville.<br />
In all, this proposed trail would run about 4.2 miles and connect 7 of the public and private parks<br />
located within the <strong>Township</strong>. With a 20-feet-wide right-of-way, this trail would consume about 10.2<br />
acres of land. It would also have the benefit of delivering recreation to the doorstep of residents<br />
within the existing and future neighborhoods. For these reasons it is recommended that the local<br />
officials incorporate this trail into its developing landscape by requiring developers to<br />
complete segments of the trail that pass through their proposed developments and provide<br />
for logical local connections to it. Again, density bonuses for development plans with these<br />
features plus flexible cluster design standards can help developers and local government<br />
partners in the provision of these features. In addition, local public facilities projects (e.g.,<br />
roads, drainage, parks, etc.) should similarly include measures to protect and develop the<br />
trail with suitable use and access features.<br />
Preliminarily a trail must incorporate a design that accommodates its intended use. Trails that<br />
serve urban neighborhoods, like the one proposed, should accommodate an “urban” level of<br />
activity with hikers, bikers, wheelchairs, strollers, cross-country skiers and in-line skaters.<br />
These urban users and the proposed trail’s location partially within the floodplain suggest<br />
certain design specifications. All of the following design features should be more deliberately<br />
defined and applied during a Phase 1 Trail Feasibility Study described later:<br />
• 10-foot wide concrete walkway that is graded to keep water off of the trail surface;<br />
• 2-foot wide graded shoulders to protect paved edges and permit proper drainage;<br />
• 3-foot-wide clearance on either side of the trail from overhanging tree canopies;<br />
• elevated boardwalks across wetlands with necessary permits; and<br />
• demonstrated compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act for the trail and its related<br />
amenities (parking, access, waste receptacles, tables, benches, water fountains, etc.).<br />
Finally, the trail’s connection with public roads requires special attention; consequently the<br />
proposed trail should:<br />
• be cleared of vegetation that would interfere with adequate sight distance;<br />
• add painted crosswalks and road lane markings;<br />
• add trail crossing warning signs along the trail and road (in both directions); and,<br />
• add bollards on the trail at least 20 feet from the street cartway.<br />
The plotting of a potential trail on a map is but the beginning point to a lengthy and potentially<br />
difficult process that ends in trail development and use. Many pitfalls can “derail” this process and<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 33 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
prevent trail completion. Nonetheless, these trails have become one of society’s popular priorities<br />
and therefore, funding for feasibility studies is readily available.<br />
For this reason, it is recommended that the <strong>Township</strong>, School District and VFW of<br />
Shellsville submit a joint application under the Pennsylvania <strong>Recreation</strong>al Trails Program.<br />
The PA DCNR offers an 80%-State to 20%-local matching grant for such studies under its<br />
Community Conservation Program. According to their staff, these grants are usually<br />
undertaken in three successive phases as follows:<br />
Phase 1 - Trail Feasibility – Determine overall feasibility of trail by analyzing a variety of<br />
natural and cultural conditions, anticipated modes, frequency and duration of use,<br />
opportunities and threats to trail development, development options and an implementation<br />
plan. In addition, this plan should specifically include master plans for the various needed<br />
trail improvements (e.g., bridges, signs, street crossings, trail retaining walls, floodproofed<br />
walkways, etc.)<br />
Phase 2 - Trail Acquisition – Based upon expected use and level of improvement, identify<br />
various techniques for access to the trail from outright purchase of rights-of-way to securing<br />
use easements. Matching grants for actual acquisition based upon professional appraisal<br />
standards and verified by state certified general real estate appraisers, plus related<br />
expenses (e.g., appraisals, environmental assessments, boundary surveys, title searches,<br />
title insurance, and settlement costs).<br />
Phase 3 - Trail Development – Design and installation of surfaces, bridges, underpasses,<br />
retaining wall, trail maps and signs. Construction materials and activities must be publicly<br />
advertised, bid and awarded in accordance with applicable laws.<br />
More information about the State grant program can be found at the following website:<br />
http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/recreation/grants/rectrails.htm<br />
Manada and Swatara Creek Riparian Buffers and Facilities – Two of the<br />
goals articulated for this plan relate to the protection of two of the <strong>Township</strong>’s important creeks.<br />
The Manada Creek is an important trout fishery and the Swatara Creek is part of a large<br />
regional Swatara Creek Greenway. To provide protection to the water quality for both of these<br />
creeks and avoid the hazards of floodplain development, it is recommended that the <strong>Township</strong><br />
undertake two actions.<br />
First, <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> should strengthen its floodplain management regulations.<br />
It is noted that the pending proposed revisions to the zoning ordinance would<br />
accomplish this objective and should be adopted.<br />
Second, while protection of floodplains and wetlands are widely accepted land use<br />
management techniques, recent awareness of diminishing surface water quality suggests<br />
the need for more protection. Studies conducted by the U.S. Forest Service demonstrate<br />
that riparian buffers offer real advantages in the removal of harmful nutrients and sediment<br />
from storm water before it enters the stream. These same riparian buffers can increase the<br />
food supply and create interconnected natural systems of movement for local wildlife.<br />
Riparian buffers are areas adjoining streams where naturally successive vegetation is<br />
provided and protected.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 34 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
The Riparian Buffers Map on the next page composites the <strong>Township</strong>’s creeks and streams with<br />
a recommended riparian buffer. The riparian buffer includes a 90-foot wide radius from the<br />
streambanks. This width is recommended by the USDA Department of Forestry, based upon<br />
the climatic conditions of this area to sustain natural streamside buffers. As the map reveals, all<br />
of the <strong>Township</strong>s tributaries, streams and creeks are shown with a riparian buffer. It is estimated<br />
that 85% of all surface water occurs in smaller streams and creeks. Therefore, the inclination of<br />
society to focus upon water quality of larger streams, creeks, rivers, and bays is defective. It is<br />
vital that surface water quality of small stream headwaters and low-order tributaries becomes<br />
our priority. Without such measures, our higher order creeks and rivers are threatened by poor<br />
surface water quality. Surface water quality is a direct function of the interaction between water<br />
and the land and vegetation through which it flows. The greatest interaction occurs within lower<br />
order streams. Within high order streams and rivers, water is principally contributed from<br />
tributaries rather than the adjoining streamside areas; therefore, the opportunity for water quality<br />
improvement is minimal. For example, no overhead tree canopy could possibly span the width<br />
of the Susquehanna River and reduce itssummer water temperature. On the other hand, a welldesigned<br />
treed landscape along a low order stream can offer direct water quality benefit to the<br />
adjoining property owner and those located downstream.<br />
Essentially, riparian buffers comprise three distinct zones, as depicted below. The following will<br />
describe where to establish, and how to plant and maintain each of these three zones:<br />
Zone 1 is the landward area located between the streambank edge under typical flow conditions,<br />
and the largest width of any of the following:<br />
• fifteen (15) feet, as measured directly perpendicular from the streambank edge;<br />
• the 100-year floodplain;<br />
• any adjoining identified wetlands; and/or,<br />
• any adjoining area characterized by slopes exceeding twenty-five percent (25%).<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 35 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
x<br />
<strong>East</strong><br />
<strong>Hanover</strong><br />
<strong>Township</strong><br />
Riparian<br />
Buffers<br />
August 28, 2002<br />
Mountain Rd.<br />
Appleby Rd.<br />
McLean Rd.<br />
Mountain Rd.<br />
Angle Rd.<br />
Manada Bottom Rd.<br />
Furnace Rd.<br />
Ridge Rd.<br />
Golf Ln.<br />
x<br />
Private Dr.<br />
Fox Run Rd.<br />
Fire House Rd.<br />
Fox Run Rd.<br />
Fire House Rd.<br />
Ridge Rd.<br />
Station Rd.<br />
W<br />
N<br />
S<br />
E<br />
x<br />
Moyer Rd.<br />
Camp Kawanis Rd.<br />
I - 81<br />
Cliff Rd.<br />
Rabbit Ln.<br />
Yellowstone Dr.<br />
Rabbit Ln.<br />
N. Fairlane Rd.<br />
Hunter Ln.<br />
Red Fox Lm.<br />
Red Hill Rd.<br />
N. Mill Rd.<br />
Manada Gap Rd.<br />
N. Meadow Ln.<br />
I - 81<br />
Dry Run Rd.<br />
Jonestown Rd.<br />
x<br />
N. Crawford Dr.<br />
Shells Church Rd.<br />
Meadow Ln.<br />
San - Jo Dr.<br />
Hi l Dr.<br />
Spring Rd.<br />
Pheasant Rd.<br />
Timber Ridge Rd.<br />
Bow Creek Rd.<br />
US Rt. 22<br />
Bunny Ln.<br />
Pheasant Rd.<br />
Kelly Court<br />
US Rt. 22<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
Short Dr.<br />
North Faith Rd.<br />
Laudermilch Rd.<br />
Country Line Rd.<br />
Dairy Ln.<br />
Sunflower Ln.<br />
Daisy Ln.<br />
Carter Dr.<br />
Mill Rd.<br />
Carlson Rd.<br />
Early Mill Rd.<br />
Pineview Dr.<br />
Pine Rd.<br />
S. Crawford Rd.<br />
Shady Ln.<br />
Trail Rd.<br />
Devonshire Heights Rd.<br />
Trail Rd.<br />
Canal Rd.<br />
Old Laudermilch Rd./ Rt. 743<br />
Sand Beach Rd.<br />
High Dr.<br />
Amor Dr.<br />
Douglas Rd.<br />
Parcels<br />
<strong>Township</strong> Boundaries<br />
Streams<br />
Riparin Buffers<br />
1200 0 1200 2400 Feet<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 36 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
This Zone must include mature canopy trees and a ground cover of warm season grasses.<br />
New tree plantings should be selected, arranged and managed to accelerate canopy<br />
growth, and offer native species habitat and food supply. New grass plantings should be<br />
selected and managed to filter-out pollutants and offer habitat. All vegetation within this<br />
Zone must thrive in wet conditions. Zone 1 requires little maintenance. As trees mature, die<br />
and decay, it is important that such natural debris be allowed to decompose within the<br />
stream. This will provide important food and habitat for beneficial microorganisms, fish and<br />
amphibians. Streamside grasses should similarly be allowed to seasonally flourish and<br />
recede. Manmade activities should be very limited and confined to perpendicular passages<br />
from Zone 2. Intensively-used locations should be fitted with raised walkways and<br />
reinforced embankments. Streamside cleanup of junk and manmade debris is permitted. No<br />
animal watering and crossing locations are permitted, unless they are reinforced.<br />
Zone 2 begins at the inland edge of the above-described Zone 1 and extends at least sixty (60)<br />
feet inland therefrom. This Zone must also include mature canopy trees generally three rows<br />
deep, and a natural undercover. New tree plantings should be selected that grow rapidly, so as<br />
to intercept passing nutrients. Such trees should also be arranged and managed to accelerate<br />
canopy growth, and offer native species habitat and food supply. Successive undercover plants<br />
should also be allowed to “evolve” with the canopy of this Zone. This Zone requires the most<br />
attention, but not for some time after initial planting. Here, the objective is to develop a stable<br />
and broad canopy of tree cover. The trees within Zone 2 are fast-growing and, therefore,<br />
consume many nutrients. The regular pruning and trimming of these trees will increase their<br />
nutrient consumption, but should not jeopardize the important overhead canopy of shade. The<br />
natural undercover should be undisturbed, except for periodic litter cleanup. Pedestrian paths<br />
can weave through Zone 2, but should be provided to prevent compacted soils and root<br />
damage.<br />
Zone 3 begins at the inland edge of the above-described Zone 2, and extends at least<br />
fifteen (15) feet inland therefrom. Where a pasture is proposed just beyond the abovedescribed<br />
Zone 2, no Zone 3 is required. This Zone should be planted with warm season<br />
grasses that are allowed to mature naturally without mowing. The tall grasses ensure that<br />
overland storm water flows do not “channel” into Zone 2. New grass plantings should be<br />
selected and managed to enable controlled grazing or haying, so long as the grasses are<br />
not reduced to a point where they are no longer able to effectively disperse the surface<br />
water flows. This Zone also requires little maintenance. Long summer grasses should be<br />
allowed to flourish and recede with the seasons. Grazing and haying is permitted, so long as<br />
the residual grass length is sufficient to disperse overland storm water flows into Zone 2 and<br />
avoid channelization.<br />
Riparian Buffer Use and Maintenance - Streamside buffers must be generally undisturbed.<br />
Mature trees and long grasses absorb more nutrients than do manicured plants. Similarly, the more<br />
extensive root systems retain passing sediments. These characteristics reduce pollution and yield<br />
abundant food and habitat for wildlife. The temptation to “over-maintain” the streamside must be<br />
overcome.<br />
Local officials should educate landowners and developers of the importance of riparian<br />
buffers, and the <strong>Township</strong>’s intent to provide for them. Newsletter articles should be used<br />
occasionally to introduce these concepts, and then to feature successful implementation<br />
examples as they occur. The sample riparian buffer ordinance contained on the next page<br />
should be incorporated into the <strong>Township</strong> Zoning Ordinance.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 37 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
Sample Regulations for Riparian Buffers<br />
As required within this Ordinance, and as guidance to any other landowner that voluntarily proposes, streamside buffers shall be provided in<br />
accordance with the following standards:<br />
Buffer Delineation – The applicant must submit a scaled site plan that clearly depicts the streamside buffer comprised of the following three<br />
separate Zones:<br />
Zone 1 – The landward area located between the<br />
streambank edge under typical flow conditions and<br />
the largest combined width of all of the following:<br />
• fifteen (15) feet as measured directly perpendicular<br />
from the streambank edge;<br />
• the 100-year floodplain;<br />
• any adjoining identified wetlands; and/or,<br />
• any adjoining area characterized by slopes<br />
exceeding twenty-five percent (25%).<br />
Zone 2 – The area beginning at the inland edge of<br />
the above-described Zone 1 and extending at least<br />
sixty (60) feet inland therefrom; and,<br />
Zone 3 – The area beginning at the inland edge of the above-described Zone 2 and extending at least fifteen (15) feet inland therefrom. Where<br />
a pasture is proposed just beyond the above-described Zone 2, no Zone 3 is required;<br />
Buffer <strong>Plan</strong>tings – Each of the respective Zones of the streamside buffer shall include vegetation that already exists or will be planted and<br />
maintained by the applicant that satisfies the following design objectives. The applicant shall submit expert evidence that the existing and/or proposed<br />
vegetation satisfies such objectives:<br />
Zone 1 – This Zone must include mature canopy trees and a ground cover of warm season grasses. New tree plantings should be selected, arranged<br />
and managed to accelerate canopy growth, and offer native species habitat and food supply. New grass plantings should be selected and managed<br />
to filter-out pollutants and offer habitat. All vegetation within this Zone must thrive in wet conditions;<br />
Zone 2 - This Zone must include mature canopy trees generally three rows deep and a natural undercover. New tree plantings should be selected<br />
that are rapid growing so as to intercept passing nutrients. Such trees should also be arranged and managed to accelerate canopy growth, and offer<br />
native species habitat and food supply. Successive undercover plants should also be allowed to “evolve” with the canopy of this Zone;<br />
Zone 3 – This Zone should be planted with warm season grasses that are allowed to mature naturally without mowing. The tall grasses ensure that<br />
overland storm water flows do not “channel” into Zone 2. New grass plantings should be selected and managed to enable controlled grazing or haying<br />
so long as the grasses are not reduced to a point where they are no longer able to effectively disperse the surface water flows.<br />
Buffer Use and Maintenance – Streamside buffers must be generally undisturbed. Mature trees and long grasses absorb more nutrients than do<br />
manicured plants. Similarly the more extensive root systems retain passing sediments. These characteristics reduce pollution and yield abundant<br />
food and habitat for wildlife. The temptation to “over-maintain” the streamside must be overcome. The following lists required maintenance activities<br />
for each Zone and the applicant must present a working plan that demonstrates compliance with such activities and practices:<br />
Zone 1 – This Zone compels requires little maintenance. As trees mature, die and decay it is important that such natural debris be allowed to<br />
decompose within the stream. This will provide important food and habitat for beneficial microorganisms, fish and amphibious animals. Streamside<br />
grasses should similarly be allowed to seasonally flourish and recede. Manmade activities should be very limited and confined to perpendicular<br />
passages from Zone 2. Intensive-used locations should be fitted with raised walkways and reinforced embankments. Streamside cleanup of junk and<br />
manmade debris is permitted. No animal watering and crossing locations are permitted.<br />
Zone 2 – This Zone requires the most attention but not for some time after initial planting. Here the objective is to develop a stable and broad canopy<br />
of tree cover. The trees within Zone 2 are fast-growing and therefore consume many nutrients. The regular pruning and trimming of these trees will<br />
increase their nutrient consumption, but should not jeopardize the important overhead canopy of shade. The natural undercover should be<br />
undisturbed except for periodic litter cleanup. Pedestrian paths can weave through Zone 2 but should be provided with raised walkways to prevent<br />
compacted soils and root damage.<br />
Zone 3 – This Zone also requires little maintenance. Long summer grasses should be allowed to flourish and recede with the seasons. Grazing and<br />
haying is permitted so long as the residual grass length is sufficient to disperse overland storm water flows into Zone 2 and avoid channelization.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 38 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
But zoning regulations alone will not get this job done, as most land uses don’t require zoning<br />
approval to continue to operate. In these areas, other options exist. First, the PA Game Commission<br />
offers its Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP). Landowners adjoining<br />
streams are offered annual rental payments of $56 to over $200 per acre for<br />
managed streamside buffers. The program is proposed to continue for 10-15 years. In<br />
addition to the rental payments, landowners are eligible for 100% cost share<br />
reimbursement for installation of suitable vegetation within these buffers. Enrollment in<br />
this program remains open through September 30, 2002, or until the State’s 100,000-acre goals<br />
are achieved. <strong>Township</strong> officials should mount a campaign to inform local landowners<br />
who abut these creeks. Program experts should be invited to explain the benefits of this<br />
program. Additional information about this program can be obtained at the following website:<br />
http://sites.state.pa.us/PA_Exec/PGC/crep/PACREP.htm<br />
Most of the success stories surrounding riparian buffers within Central Pennsylvania have been<br />
the results of dedicated volunteers from conservation and sporting groups. Local anglers have<br />
made it their mission to rehabilitate and save stream habitats for fishing purposes. The<br />
<strong>Township</strong>, too, shares in these dedicated groups. These captive groups should be educated<br />
about the benefits of riparian buffers and energized into action. These “neighbors” can<br />
probably best effect the peer pressure to convince local landowners to get involved. A<br />
“hip-boot-brigade” should be formed from local sportsmen who should regularly travel up the<br />
waterways and meet with adjoining landowners, and describe the benefits and programs of<br />
riparian buffers.<br />
Another powerful ally are the <strong>Township</strong>’s youth. Environmental studies classes can develop pilot<br />
riparian buffers at visible school and park locations; these focused successes enable the<br />
benefits of these buffers to be experienced first-hand by the general public. The School District<br />
should develop and regularly offer a streamside riparian buffer workshop as part of its<br />
curriculum, for students to learn “first-hand” about how man can co-exist with nature.<br />
An obvious location for such a project would be along the creek that crosses the VFW<br />
Picnic Grounds that abut the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Townshoip Elementary School. Local and<br />
School District officials should cooperate on a number of these pilot projects at visible<br />
locations within the <strong>Township</strong>. Then, as succeses mount, they should be featured in<br />
local newsletter and media articles that widen awareness and attention about their use<br />
and benefits. Such projects represent excellent candidates for Growing Greener grants from<br />
the State. Once momentum is achieved, other civic groups are likely to get involved.<br />
Swatara Creek Public Boat Access - Last the Swatara Creek has been identified by<br />
the PA DCNR as a water trail. The Swatara Creek Watershed Association has teamed up with<br />
the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) and DCNR to develop more than 14.6<br />
miles of water trails miles from Jonestown to Union Canal Canoe Rental, in Lebanon County.<br />
throughout Pennsylvania. Water trails are a recreation venue patterned after their land-based<br />
cousins--hiking and biking routes. Under the water trail initiative, PFBC and DCNR work with<br />
conservation partners to provide specific information about designated water trails, including<br />
directions to trailheads and take-out points and information about natural, scenic, historic,<br />
geologic and other points of interest along the way. As such <strong>Township</strong> officials hope to<br />
secure a site along the creek to provide for public boat access along with related<br />
amenities (e.g. parking, signs, picnic tables and trash receptacles). The Parks Map<br />
depicts a “floating symbol” that should be interpreted not to select a particular site as to<br />
identify the general need for such a facility along the creek in the southeast corner of the<br />
<strong>Township</strong>. As opportunities occur the <strong>Township</strong> will negotiate for this site and its<br />
improvements.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 39 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations
VI. Mandatory Dedication<br />
Mandatory dedication of parkland has become a standard technique for local park systems to<br />
keep pace with growth since it was enabled by the Pennsylvania Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code<br />
in the late 1980s. However, <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has yet to employ this technique for<br />
parkland acquisition and improvement. This section will perform the necessary calculations to<br />
support mandatory dedication or fees-in-lieu-thereof within the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />
The NRPA’s recommended minimum standards for local parklands is listed below:<br />
NRPA Local Park Acreage Standards<br />
Park Type<br />
Community Park<br />
Neighborhood Park<br />
Total<br />
Minimum Acres Needed per 1,000 Population<br />
5 to 8 acres<br />
1 –2 acres<br />
6 -10 acres<br />
To date, the <strong>Township</strong> and School District has provided local parklands at a rate of about 13.5<br />
acres per 1000 population exceeding the NRPA standards listed above; however, much of this has<br />
been derived from other sources. For this reason, this <strong>Plan</strong> will only calculate needed parklands on<br />
the higher of the NRPA standards – namely 10 acres per 1,000 people. To derive a per unit or per<br />
lot standard, the 1,000 population is divided by the average household size (year 2000) reported as<br />
follows:<br />
2000 Average<br />
Household Size<br />
Mandatory Parkland Dedication Calculations (for raw land)<br />
No. of Dwellings<br />
per 1,000 Population<br />
Required Park Acres<br />
per Dwelling Unit<br />
2.60 385 .026 acres<br />
If raw land was all that was needed to provide for local parks, then the preceding required park<br />
acres per dwelling unit would enable the <strong>Township</strong> to collect parkland that would keep pace with its<br />
projected growth. But a community and/or neighborhood park is more than raw land; it requires a<br />
high level of infrastructure and improvement. Generally, the value of these improvements equals<br />
the value of the parkland itself. Therefore, it is recommended that the <strong>Township</strong> double the<br />
preceding acreage figures to .052 acres per dwelling unit to derive needed mandatory<br />
dedication standards that will effectively meet expected demand for developed parks.<br />
As an alternative to parkland dedication, municipalities can accept a fee-in-lieu of parkland dedication.<br />
This approach can only be used in those instances where the developer and municipality<br />
agree on the amount of the fee-in-lieu. In addition, such funds cannot be used merely to maintain<br />
existing facilities, but must be used to:<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 40 - Chapter VI – Mandatory Dedication
1. purchase new parkland;<br />
2. purchase new equipment for new or existing parks; and/or,<br />
3. make improvements to existing parks that will serve existing residents and those of the<br />
proposed development.<br />
According to requirements within the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code, amounts of the fees-in-lieu<br />
should be derived from the following approach:<br />
An appraiser should be retained by the municipality to analyze recent real estate transactions<br />
and derive estimates of fair market value. Such estimates can be based upon all properties<br />
within the municipality, or on a neighborhood basis. It is important that the appraiser be informed<br />
of the development features (e.g., utilities, zoning, curbs, sidewalks, etc.) common to<br />
such lands, so that accurate real estate comparisons can be identified. Once these estimates<br />
are derived, they should be periodically updated to reflect the ever-changing value of land.<br />
When disputes between the developer and municipality occur, both the developer and<br />
municipality should select an appraiser who, in turn, should jointly select a third appraiser. This<br />
third appraiser should then determine the fair market value of the land.<br />
Funds collected under this approach must be used to provide for recreation facilities that are<br />
accessible to residents of the proposed development. In determining accessibility to the park, local<br />
officials should be guided by the respective park service areas. Monies collected for community<br />
parks (about $1664/unit) need to be spent somewhere within the <strong>Township</strong>, and because the<br />
<strong>Township</strong> already has provided for its projected community park needs through the year 2020 such<br />
funds need not be spent on community park improvements. Instead such monies can be spent on<br />
nearby neighborhood parks or the proposed Village Link Trail. On the other hand, monies collected<br />
for neighborhood parks (about $416/unit) from proposed new units within the “urban<br />
neighborhoods,” as identified on the map contained on page 26 of this <strong>Plan</strong>, should be spent within<br />
the respective neighborhood. Monies collected for neighborhood parks from proposed new units<br />
outside of the “urban neighborhoods” should be spent within that “urban neighborhood” that is<br />
closest to the respective unit as possible.<br />
Fees-in-lieu collected that are not immediately spent need to be deposited within an interest<br />
bearing account clearly identifying the specific recreation facilities for which the fee was received.<br />
Funds collected that are not spent within three years of deposit shall be refunded to the payee<br />
upon request. Additional applicable regulations are contained within Section 503.(11) of the<br />
Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code.<br />
To estimate the value of fees-in-lieu of parkland dedication an average value of $40,000 per acre<br />
will be used to account for the value of improved residentially-zoned land within the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />
This figure is based upon recent real estate transactions researched by <strong>Township</strong> staff during the<br />
summer of 2002. Therefore, the estimated value for fees-in-lieu of parkland dedication within the<br />
<strong>Township</strong> should be about $2080 per dwelling unit.<br />
.052 acres / unit X $40,000 / acre = $2080 / unit<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 41 - Chapter VI – Mandatory Dedication
By applying these above figures to the <strong>Township</strong>’s projected growth, as described in Chapter III,<br />
the following dedicated acres and/or fees-in-lieu can be collected to meet increasing park demand<br />
generated by growth:<br />
Time Period<br />
Projected Dedicated Parklands or Fees-In-Lieu-Thereof 2000 to 2020<br />
Projected New<br />
Dwellings<br />
Projected Dedicated<br />
Parklands<br />
Projected Fees-In-Lieu of<br />
Parkland Dedication<br />
2000-2010 387 20.1 acres $804,960<br />
2000-2020 774 40.2 acres $1,609,920<br />
As can be seen, the value of mandatory dedication/fee-in-lieu-thereof standards is about 1.6<br />
million dollars over the next 20 years; therefore, the <strong>Township</strong> should waste little time in<br />
adopting and applying such provisions within its subdivision and land development<br />
ordinance.<br />
With adoption of this plan comes the ability of the <strong>Township</strong> to collect mandatory dedicated<br />
parklands or fees-in-lieu thereof. This is the best, and most widely-used method of park system<br />
acquisition and development that basically enables municipalities to keep pace with growth.<br />
However, the use of this technique requires expertise on the specific applicable provisions of<br />
the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code that enable it. In addition, since this technique is applied<br />
during the subdivision and land development process, it forces those involved in the delivery of<br />
parks and recreation to become part of that review process. Finally, specific provisions of the<br />
<strong>Township</strong> zoning ordinance provide incentives for the creation and protection of parklands and<br />
open spaces.<br />
All of these “details” will likely strain local staff and officials’ knowledge and resulting<br />
initial use of the mandatory dedication approach. Therefore it is recommended that the<br />
<strong>Township</strong> sponsor a workshop for those involved in the process to educate all about<br />
how to apply this new approach.<br />
This workshop should focus upon:<br />
1. the duties of each person/agency in the review procedures of proposed<br />
developments with dedicated parklands or fees-in-lieu thereof;<br />
2. the specific deadlines imposed upon the development review process;<br />
3. the actual language contained within Sections 402.5.5. and 623 of the <strong>East</strong><br />
<strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance;<br />
4. the language of Section 503.(11) of the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code; and,<br />
5. those various provisions of the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Zoning Ordinance that<br />
provide incentives and design flexibility for the creation and protection of<br />
parklands and open spaces.<br />
This workshop could be presented by the <strong>Township</strong>’s planning consultants, the<br />
<strong>Township</strong>’s Solicitor, the <strong>Township</strong>’s engineer, local officials from adjoining<br />
municipalities who have experience with the process and/or staff from the State.<br />
Even after the conduct of this workshop, the review and approval of a development<br />
proposal can be difficult and require skillful negotiation. Therefore, it is recommended<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 42 - Chapter VI – Mandatory Dedication
that the <strong>Township</strong> hire expert development plan review assistance from planning and<br />
engineering experts during the first few proposals that run through the process. These<br />
experts should assist in staff reviews of such proposals and attend the various Board<br />
and Commission hearings where the actual formal reviews occur. Then once local staff<br />
and officials become comfortable with their duties and roles, these “experts” can be<br />
used on an as-needed-basis, upon request from the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />
It is also important to note the <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Commission will now begin to play a<br />
role in the acquisition and development of parks since they are integral to the<br />
subdivision and land development review process. They too, should participate in the<br />
workshop.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 43 - Chapter VI – Mandatory Dedication
VII. Capital Budget<br />
The following lists those parks and improvements recommended by this <strong>Plan</strong> that are eligible<br />
expenses covered by parklands or revenues generated from mandatory dedication or fees-in-lieuthereof:<br />
Service Area<br />
New Parks<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ned<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ned Parks and Improvements<br />
Value of<br />
New Parks<br />
<strong>Township</strong>-wide NA $0<br />
Community Parks<br />
Neighborhood Parks<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ned Improvements<br />
Electrification, lighting and<br />
public address system<br />
Value of<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ned<br />
Improvements<br />
$150,000<br />
Shellsville NA $0 NA $0<br />
Northern Link 6 acres $240,000<br />
Athletic field, playground, picnic pavilion,<br />
parking, basketball, volleyball, related site $255,528<br />
features.<br />
Southern Link<br />
1 acre<br />
$0, required by Playground, picnic pavilion, basketball,<br />
developer<br />
volleyball, related site features.<br />
$110,520<br />
Athletic field, playground, picnic pavilion,<br />
Grantville 4.1 acres $164,000 parking, basketball, volleyball, related site $255,528<br />
features.<br />
Chesapeake MHP 1.9 acres $76,000<br />
Playground, picnic pavilion, basketball,<br />
volleyball, related site features.<br />
$110,520<br />
Shellsville, Northern Link,<br />
& Grantville<br />
neighborhoods<br />
4.2 miles<br />
10.2 acres<br />
Total Value of <strong>Plan</strong>ned Parks $480,000<br />
Linear Parks<br />
To be determined To be determined To be determined<br />
Total Value of <strong>Plan</strong>ned<br />
Improvements<br />
$882,096<br />
Total Value of Recommended Parks and Improvements - $1,362,096<br />
A comparison of the projected revenues via mandatory dedication over the next 20 years and the<br />
costs of planned new parks and improvements is provided below:<br />
Projected Revenues Projected Costs Balance<br />
$1,609,920 $1,362,096 + $247,824<br />
The excess revenues can be used to design, acquire and construct the planned Village Link Trail<br />
following the completion of a trail feasibility study that will determine its alignment, mode of<br />
ownership, needed surfaces and other related amenities (e.g., road crossings, signs, bridges,<br />
retaining walls, etc.).<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 44 - Chapter VII – Capital Budget
In addition to the above new parks and park improvements, this <strong>Plan</strong> has identified various<br />
needed repairs to existing parks as tabulated below:<br />
Recommended Repairs to Existing Parks<br />
Park<br />
Total Cost of Repairs<br />
EHT Municipal Park $32,600<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School $25,000<br />
Total Cost of Needed Repairs $57,600<br />
These expenses are not eligible for funding under the <strong>Township</strong>’s mandatory dedication or feesin-lieu-thereof<br />
requirements of the subdivision and land development ordinance. Therefore the<br />
<strong>Township</strong> and the School District will have to rely upon other more traditional forms of financing<br />
for these maintenance tasks. Previously expended general funds that were used to acquire<br />
and improve parks and are now replaced with the mandatory dedication revenues should<br />
be diverted to finance increased maintenance efforts. In addition, both the <strong>Township</strong> and<br />
the School District should employ creative ways to enlist the help of volunteers who<br />
often are willing to “pitch-in-a-hand” to keep their parks in good condition.<br />
Given the projected growth within the <strong>Township</strong> and the resulting need for additional<br />
scattered neighborhood parks, it is clear that additional maintenance staff will be required.<br />
It is unlikely that volunteer manpower will be able to meet the increasing needs for<br />
maintenance of the expanding park system. The <strong>Township</strong> should evaluate manpower<br />
needs as these new parks come on-line and make necessary manpower adjustments. The<br />
<strong>Township</strong> might also consider negotiating a maintenance agreement with the School<br />
District which likely is better prepared and equipped to maintain parks on a temporary or<br />
permanent basis. Of course the details would determine the feasibility of this approach. In<br />
the end the <strong>Township</strong> must commit the manpower and resources to keep these parks<br />
functional, safe and attractive, whatever approach is selected. Fortunately along with<br />
growth will come additional tax and recreation fee revenues to help offset costs.<br />
With more maintenance staff comes the need for more detailed work tasks and direction. It<br />
is important that the <strong>Township</strong> clearly describe in detail those routine tasks that will be<br />
required to keep the parks in good condition. This should include a duty-roster of tasks to<br />
be completed at regular intervals (eg. daily, weekly, monthly, seasonally, annually, as<br />
needed, etc.) In addition, the maintenance staff needs to know what constitutes “good<br />
condition” for park maintenance. The <strong>Township</strong> should develop specific descriptions of<br />
standards-of-care for each park and its facilities so that all have the same expectations of<br />
what constitutes acceptable maintenance. These duties should be performed by the Park<br />
and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader with help from an outside consultant, if required. The <strong>Township</strong><br />
might also look to the School District for help in developing the duty-roster and standardsof-care.<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 45 - Chapter VII – Capital Budget