10.06.2015 Views

Recreation Plan - East Hanover Township

Recreation Plan - East Hanover Township

Recreation Plan - East Hanover Township

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong><br />

Dauphin County, PA<br />

Adopted: 4/1/03<br />

Roth<strong>Plan</strong><br />

Harry B. Roth, AICP<br />

Community <strong>Plan</strong>ning Consultant<br />

22E <strong>East</strong> Roseville Road<br />

Lancaster, PA 17601<br />

Phone – (717) 560-2383<br />

Fax – (717) 560-3709<br />

Email – rothplan@dejazzd.com


EAST HANOVER TOWNSHIP<br />

MUNICIPAL DIRECTORY<br />

Board of Supervisors<br />

Sally Zaino, Chairman<br />

George Rish, Vice-Chairman<br />

Rod Nissley, Past Chairman<br />

Rebecca M. Oller<br />

Michael Yingling<br />

Administrative Staff<br />

Rebecca M. Oller, Facilitator<br />

Nora J. Schaffer, Secretary-Treasurer<br />

Deborah Casey, Administrative Assistant<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ning Commission<br />

Larry McCarter, Chairman<br />

Joseph Kenny III, Vice-Chairman<br />

Richard Hoover<br />

Barry Nazar<br />

Chris O’Neil<br />

George Rish<br />

Patricia Tantum<br />

Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board<br />

Wendy Zimmerman, Chairman<br />

Donna Berkheimer, Vice-Chairman<br />

Jennifer Everts<br />

Chrissy Fletcher<br />

Russ Kiessling<br />

Judy Schmolitz<br />

Vacancy<br />

Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader<br />

Danielle Gornik<br />

Park Office - 376 North Crawford Road<br />

Grantville, PA 17028<br />

Telephone: 717/469-7614<br />

Fax: 717/469-1442<br />

Cell: 215-2120<br />

E-mail: ehparkrec@earthlink.net<br />

Hours: Monday through Friday<br />

8 A.M. –4 P.M. (flexible)<br />

EAST HANOVER TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL OFFICE<br />

8848 Jonestown Road<br />

Grantville, Pennsylvania 17028<br />

Telephone: 717/469-0833<br />

FAX: 717/469-1442<br />

Hours: Monday through Friday, 8 A.M.–4 P.M.


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Page<br />

Municipal Directory........................................................................................................................... i<br />

Table of Contents ..............................................................................................................................ii<br />

Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1<br />

I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................2-3<br />

A. Purpose............................................................................................................................................2<br />

B. How to Use This <strong>Plan</strong> ...................................................................................................................2-3<br />

II. Study Goals .......................................................................................................................4-5<br />

A. <strong>Plan</strong>ning Goals.................................................................................................................................4<br />

B. Facilities Goals.................................................................................................................................5<br />

C. Administration Goals........................................................................................................................5<br />

III. Community Background ................................................................................................6-16<br />

A. Historical Sketch of <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Service.........................................................................6<br />

B. Municipal Budget Profile..................................................................................................................7<br />

C. <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Administration ...........................................................................................8-9<br />

D. <strong>Recreation</strong> Maintenance...........................................................................................................10-11<br />

E. <strong>Recreation</strong> Programs................................................................................................................11-12<br />

F. Population & Housing Studies..................................................................................................12-16<br />

IV.<br />

Facilities Inventory........................................................................................................17-20<br />

Parks Map.................................................................................................................... following page 17<br />

Community Parks .................................................................................................................................18<br />

Neighborhood Parks.............................................................................................................................18<br />

Private Parks....................................................................................................................................19-20<br />

V. Park Analysis & Recommendations ...........................................................................21-34<br />

Regional Parks .....................................................................................................................................21<br />

Community Parks ............................................................................................................................21-25<br />

Neighborhood Parks........................................................................................................................25-31<br />

Linear Parks.....................................................................................................................................31-39<br />

Riparian Buffers Map................................................................................................... following page 35<br />

VI. Mandatory Dedication ..................................................................................................40-43<br />

VII.<br />

Capital Budget...............................................................................................................44-45<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - ii - Table of Contents


Executive Summary<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has a long history of involvement in parks and recreation; however, its<br />

commitment has escalated over the last 10-15 years. This <strong>Plan</strong> will help the <strong>Township</strong> take the next step<br />

towards a more comprehensive system of parkland acquisition and development that can keep pace with<br />

projected growth.<br />

The <strong>Township</strong>’s recreation-related financial expenditures are growing rapidly while no means for park and<br />

recreation revenues exist. The projected growth of the <strong>Township</strong>’s population from 5322 in 2000, to 6912<br />

by the year 2020, will overburden the <strong>Township</strong>’s budgeted general funds, unless a separate form of<br />

recreation revenue can be activated.<br />

A volunteer Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board oversees the park and recreation system with help from the fulltime<br />

paid Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader. The <strong>Township</strong> offers a generous variety of recreation programs,<br />

particularly annual special events. A full-time Park and Building Maintenance employee devotes just<br />

under 2/3 of his time to park maintenance and the balance on maintaining the <strong>Township</strong>’s two buildings.<br />

Today the <strong>Township</strong> contains nine different park/recreation sites. Of these, only three are considered to<br />

be public facilities. The largest public facility is the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park with 60 acres<br />

and a full range of athletic, passive, picnic, playground and support facilities. The <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />

Elementary School and the adjoining Shellsville VFW ballfields comprise another significant park with<br />

multiple athletic fields, playgrounds and some indoor facilities. Finally, the Grantville Fire Company<br />

Carnival Grounds provide a home for the <strong>Township</strong>’s annual summer festival.<br />

With the development of the <strong>Township</strong>’s Municipal Park, the <strong>Township</strong> currently has public parkland at a<br />

rate of about 13.5 acres per 1000 population. This figure exceeds the nationally-accepted standard of 6-<br />

10 acres per 1000 population advocated by the National <strong>Recreation</strong> and Park Association. While this<br />

abundant acreage can meet the <strong>Township</strong>’s community-wide park needs for the projected future, local<br />

neighborhood deficiencies exist and will worsen as new planned urban neighborhoods develop. This <strong>Plan</strong><br />

recommends the development of four new neighborhood parks totaling 13 acres with $882,096 worth of<br />

park improvements to overcome this deficiency and serve the ultimate-buildout of the planned<br />

neighborhoods. In addition, the <strong>Plan</strong> recommends that $57,600 worth of repairs be made to the <strong>Township</strong><br />

Municipal Park and the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School. Last, the <strong>Plan</strong> recommends the conduct of a<br />

feasibility study for the creation of a new “Village Link Trail” that would link each of the <strong>Township</strong>’s<br />

planned urban neighborhoods with local parks and the Horseshoe Trail.<br />

State law enables the <strong>Township</strong> to require would-be developers to either dedicate parklands for public<br />

use or donate fees-in-lieu of dedication to the <strong>Township</strong> for such facilities. Based upon socio-economic<br />

conditions, the <strong>Township</strong> can require each new dwelling unit to dedicate .052 acres of parkland or pay a<br />

fee of about $2080. With the growth projected in the <strong>Township</strong>, this source of revenue can produce about<br />

40 new acres of parkland or about 1.6 million dollars over the next 20 years. This will result in a surplus of<br />

just under $250,000, when compared with specific planned parks and their improvements. This surplus<br />

can be used to fund the acquisition and development of the proposed Village Link Trail.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 1 - Executive Summary


I. Introduction<br />

A. Purpose of the <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Like any business, local governments need to chart future plans so that they can assure an<br />

efficient use of resources. Local governments are in the business of assuring public welfare<br />

and delivering public services. The preparation of a <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> provides a deliberate<br />

framework of information that can be used to make future decisions regarding the delivery<br />

of recreation services. In addition, this <strong>Plan</strong> will identify ways for <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> to<br />

work with the School District, to make the <strong>Township</strong> a better place to live and play.<br />

One definition of planning is “the allocation of municipal resources toward municipal goals<br />

and objectives”; this definition embodies the essence of this study. This study first catalogs,<br />

maps and describes the <strong>Township</strong>'s recreation-related resources. These resources include<br />

land, streams, roads, parks, neighborhoods, programs, schools, staff, finances, and so on.<br />

Analyses are performed to determine the capability of these resources to serve or<br />

accommodate recreation/open space needs.<br />

Next, a set of planning goals are formulated. These goals establish a list of priorities that<br />

need to be addressed. Third, the goals are applied to the municipal resources, yielding a<br />

future scheme for the development of parklands.<br />

Finally, implementation strategies are discussed and recommended that enable the<br />

<strong>Township</strong> to set in motion the analyses and information presented in the <strong>Plan</strong>. These<br />

strategies will involve those planning technologies currently available for use by local<br />

governments within the region. In the end, any planning process is meaningless, unless its<br />

recommendations find application as part of the <strong>Township</strong>'s business—the protection of<br />

public welfare and the delivery of public services. This <strong>Plan</strong> will serve as a supplement to<br />

the <strong>Township</strong>’s Official Comprehensive <strong>Plan</strong> concerning matters of parks and recreation.<br />

B. How to Use This <strong>Plan</strong><br />

This <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is aimed at assisting local officials in the administration of the<br />

<strong>Township</strong>'s recreation facilities. Many action-oriented recommendations have been<br />

expressed throughout the <strong>Plan</strong> text; these recommendations have been italicized and<br />

printed in bold letters, so that the decision-maker's attention is immediately drawn to<br />

them. The maps within the <strong>Plan</strong> have also been carefully prepared and colored, so that the<br />

information can be easily visualized. The many analyses utilized throughout the study were<br />

devised to maximize utility of the findings. Step-by-step description of these methodologies<br />

have been furnished to enable the reader to gain a better understanding of the issue, and<br />

its planning implications. Finally, a detailed table of contents appears at the beginning of<br />

the text, which provides quick reference to the appropriate sections of the study. All of<br />

these features will aid local decision-makers in their evaluation of future recreation<br />

proposals.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 2 - Chapter I – Introduction


A second important function of this <strong>Plan</strong> is its collection of important information. The <strong>Plan</strong><br />

provides convenient access to a wealth of up-to-date information concerning its many<br />

interrelated factors. This information will serve, not only <strong>Township</strong> officials, but service<br />

agencies, property owners, residents, business leaders, and prospective developers. The<br />

cataloging of existing conditions will also provide the groundwork upon which future <strong>Plan</strong><br />

updates can be more easily accomplished.<br />

Finally, the <strong>Plan</strong> conveys a set of policies regarding future recreation development within<br />

the <strong>Township</strong>. These policies are based upon the <strong>Township</strong>'s goals and can be useful to<br />

local decision-makers. In addition, many of the recommendations of this <strong>Plan</strong> specifically<br />

respond to the wishes of the general public, who were heard at several “town meetings”<br />

during the <strong>Plan</strong>’s preparation. Therefore, the <strong>Plan</strong> incorporates extensive public input.<br />

In summary, it is important for all of those persons involved and/or interested in the<br />

delivery of recreation services to read, at least once, and understand this entire <strong>Plan</strong>,<br />

at least once. Then, local decision-makers should keep it handy when evaluating<br />

future development proposals, service adjustments or public investments. The<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>'s format will avail considerable information, analysis and expertise, without<br />

requiring its complete rereading. In the end, it is hoped that the <strong>Plan</strong> will become a<br />

powerful, yet practical, tool in local decision-making.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 3 - Chapter I – Introduction


II. Study Goals<br />

F<br />

“If you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there!”<br />

-An old saying<br />

or any project to maximize its likelihood for success, it is important that goals be established to<br />

guide the efforts. This <strong>Plan</strong> and the <strong>Township</strong>’s park and recreation services are no exception.<br />

The following lists goals that have been expressed for this <strong>Plan</strong>. This list is derived from<br />

discussions with local officials during the summer of 2002.<br />

The overall goal of this plan is to establish a process by which <strong>Township</strong> residents can be provided<br />

with a suitable level of recreation facilities as growth occurs. The following lists the goals of this<br />

<strong>Plan</strong> by several key components:<br />

A. <strong>Plan</strong>ning Goals<br />

1. Coordinate the use of the <strong>Township</strong>’s facilities among its many varied users, so<br />

that anyone can use the <strong>Plan</strong> to understand who is responsible for park<br />

improvements, maintenance and scheduling.<br />

2. Evaluate the best way to continue the high level of volunteer effort in the delivery of<br />

recreation service.<br />

3. Ensure that recreation facilities are offered for everyone, young and old, active and<br />

sedentary, competitive and passive, etc.<br />

4. Inventory existing parks and determine the level of service they provide to the<br />

<strong>Township</strong>. Identify deficiencies at existing parks and suggest specific actions of<br />

remedy.<br />

5. Generate public support for recreation by educating them about its benefits.<br />

6. Foster a spirit of cooperation among the <strong>Township</strong>, the School District and other<br />

volunteer and semi-public groups.<br />

7. Provide specific, prioritized actions to improve the <strong>Township</strong>’s parks, identifying<br />

who is responsible for implementation, estimated costs, and potential funding<br />

sources.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 4 - Chapter II – Study Goals


B. Facilities Goals<br />

1. Provide an objective and reasoned system for the acquisition of new parks and<br />

recreation opportunities, the improvement of existing parks, and the maintenance<br />

of all parks.<br />

2. Conceptually plan for streamside buffers as a means of improving water quality,<br />

and providing recreation and “hands-on” educational settings, with particular<br />

emphasis on preserving the Manada Creek as an important trout fishery and the<br />

Swatara Creek as a water trail.<br />

3. Seek to link parks, schools and other activity centers with linear parks, streamside<br />

buffers and sidewalks with special attention paid to bike routes and hiking trails.<br />

4. Ensure that parks are well-kept, attractive and safe.<br />

5. Focus new parks into “urban neighborhoods” where a full range of public facilities<br />

and services are expected.<br />

6. Implement recommendations of the Swatara Greenway Corridor by acquiring and<br />

developing public access to the creek and protecting valuable recreation use<br />

C. Administration Goals<br />

1. Improve the planning and coordination of recreation facilities.<br />

2. Perform the requisite analyses to justify the <strong>Township</strong>’s use of mandatory<br />

dedication (or fees-in-lieu-thereof) of parklands within its subdivision and land<br />

development ordinance.<br />

3. Present recommendations regarding the most efficient and effective methods to<br />

provide parks.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 5 - Chapter II – Study Goals


III. Community Background<br />

A. Historical Sketch of <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Service<br />

During the first half of the last century, no emphasis was placed on organized recreation or activities.<br />

Instead, local residents relied upon the abundant nearby Appalachian and Horseshoe Trails and<br />

other natural features to derive much of their leisure pastimes. Hiking, fishing, hunting were popular<br />

activities and many local men were members of the Blue Ridge Sportsman’s Club. In addition<br />

Sunday school baseball competitions, pie socials and other church and school activities provided<br />

needed diversion from the work “down-on-the-farm.” Hershey Park opened in 1907 and provided<br />

facilities for organized picnics and family reunions.<br />

In 1948 the Grantville Fire Company began its annual summer carnival. The whole family lived for<br />

these Saturday nights of bingo, penny pitches, ball throws and chicken corn soup.<br />

In 1956 the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Association was formed to promote supervised recreation for<br />

area youth. It was comprised of representatives from local churches and civic and fraternal<br />

organizations. Summer playground programs, community parties, and summer picnics were planned<br />

and held. A “Teen-Canteen” held regular dances at the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School until 1962,<br />

when the school was merged into the Lower Dauphin School District. Since then, the School District<br />

has offered facilities and programs for the students’ recreation needs.<br />

Between 1962 and 1972 there was no formal recreation organization operating within the <strong>Township</strong><br />

until the formation of the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Interim <strong>Recreation</strong> Organization. This new effort sponsored a<br />

summer playground program, square dances, ice and roller skating parties, slimnastics for women,<br />

volleyball competitions, youth dances and costume parties. In the mid-1970s the Dauphin County<br />

Parks and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board became involved within the <strong>Township</strong> and offered tennis clinics and<br />

training for residents. They also sponsored entertainment at the Memorial Day Picnics held at the<br />

VFW Picnic Grove.<br />

<strong>Recreation</strong>al activities continued to be organized by the Interim Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board until<br />

the early 1980's. In the Fall, 1981, seven persons were appointed to the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong><br />

Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board. In the Summer, 1982 a questionnaire was sent to all township<br />

residents seeking input on the <strong>Recreation</strong> Board, the acquisition of land for recreational purposes,<br />

the means of financing recreational programs, etc. In November, 1982, the Board adopted<br />

Ordinance 82-4 which, in addition to creating the Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board, established the<br />

regulations for membership, officers, responsibilities, and financial considerations.<br />

In 1983, the first <strong>Township</strong> newsletter was published and mailed to all <strong>Township</strong> residents. A<br />

limited number of classes were conducted in various locations in the <strong>Township</strong>. In 1983, the<br />

<strong>Township</strong> purchased 13 acres of land for a new municipal building and a recreational area.<br />

<strong>Township</strong> activities were relocated to the new Municipal Building in 1986. <strong>Township</strong> officials<br />

purchased an additional 16 acres in 1988, an additional 6 acres in 1990, and an additional 25<br />

acres in 1993. In 1992, the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Board of Supervisors hired a part-time park<br />

attendant for the <strong>Township</strong>. In 1996, the position became a full-time <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader position.<br />

Today, with the aid of a very active Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board and a number of volunteers,<br />

residents and local officials take pride in their park system which is the envy of neighboring<br />

municipalities.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 6 - Chapter III – Community Background


B. Municipal Budget Profile<br />

The following graphs the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong>’s reported total expenditures and those<br />

assigned to culture/recreation needs during the years 1999 through 2001.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Expenses<br />

2,500,000.00<br />

6.00%<br />

2,000,000.00<br />

5.00%<br />

4.00%<br />

1,500,000.00<br />

3.00%<br />

1,000,000.00<br />

2.00%<br />

500,000.00<br />

1.00%<br />

0.00<br />

1999 2000 2001<br />

Total expenses 1,173,695.00 1,478,889.00 1,936,448.00<br />

Culture/<strong>Recreation</strong> Expenses 25,499.00 38,171.00 43,555.00<br />

% Culture/<strong>Recreation</strong> 2.10% 4.60% 5.70%<br />

0.00%<br />

While the <strong>Township</strong>’s budget has grown steadily the last three years, its expenses<br />

associated with culture/recreation have accelerated and now comprise almost 6 percent of<br />

the total expenses. The <strong>Township</strong>’s funding of culture/recreation facilities and programs<br />

has grown by over 170 percent during the last three years. Such dramatic increases cannot<br />

continue unless additional forms of revenue are obtained for these purposes. Clearly,<br />

culture/recreation has become one of the <strong>Township</strong>’s budget priorities as evidenced not<br />

only by these figures but the nice EHT Municipal Park and its various programs offered<br />

throughout the community.<br />

The <strong>Township</strong> now charges modest user fees to help defray ythe operating costs of<br />

particular programs and special events; however, these do not cover the total costs of<br />

services provided. This must change if the <strong>Township</strong> is to face the demands of a<br />

suburbanizing population that will expect high levels of recreation service. Fortunately,<br />

there are several revenue generating options available that the <strong>Township</strong> can employ. This<br />

<strong>Plan</strong> will provide the framework for tapping these funding sources and direct how the<br />

monies should be spent according to nationally-accepted levels of service.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 7 - Chapter III – Community Background


C. <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> Administration<br />

<strong>Township</strong> Board of Supervisors - Within <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> the Board of<br />

Supervisors are the elected officials who have the final authority on all matters of the<br />

<strong>Township</strong>. This is also true with respect to parks and recreation. They allocate funds<br />

and manpower among all of the <strong>Township</strong>’s functions including parks and recreation. To<br />

assist their decision-making they have created several boards and staff positions as<br />

follows:<br />

Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board – This seven-member board was created in 1980 to<br />

develop the <strong>Township</strong>’s park system. Each member serves a five-year term and the<br />

Board is comprised of individuals appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Today their<br />

principal duties include:<br />

1. Select programs to be offered;<br />

2. Suggest park improvements;<br />

3. Recommend new parks;<br />

4. Compile quarterly recreation newsletter with program guides; and,<br />

5. Recommend budget for park maintenance.<br />

Parks and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader – This full-time paid staff position directs the day-to-day<br />

operations of the <strong>Township</strong>’s park and recreation system. This position has the following<br />

principal duties as described in the job description:<br />

1. Staff liaison between Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board and Board of Supervisors;<br />

2. Formulate, organize, supervise and evaluate a well-rounded program of<br />

recreation for the <strong>Township</strong>;<br />

3. Supervise and schedule use of the <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park;<br />

4. Coordinate with <strong>Township</strong> Facilitator maintenance of the <strong>Township</strong> Municipal<br />

Park;<br />

5. Recruit, train and supervise park employees,<br />

6. Assist Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Board in the preparation of annual budget and report;<br />

7. Recommend appropriate program and facility use fees;<br />

8. Monitor park and recreation operations, programs and complaints and make<br />

suitable recommendations;<br />

9. Work closely with the school district and other civic groups involved in the<br />

delivery of recreation service;<br />

10. Keep abreast of developments and technologies of the recreation profession;<br />

11. Attend various local meetings as well as professional development conferences<br />

and seminars;<br />

12. Conduct maintenance and safety checks and make necessary recommendations<br />

for standard-of-care;<br />

13. Record information about program participation, registration, instructor forms,<br />

publicity, and research on special projects; and,<br />

14. Collects and accounts for all recreation fees.<br />

<strong>Township</strong> Secretary/Treasurer – Among this position’s other principal duties, the<br />

<strong>Township</strong> Secretary/Treasurer deposits all recreation fees.<br />

<strong>Township</strong> Facilitator - Among this position’s other principal duties, the <strong>Township</strong><br />

Facilitator acts as an initial point of contact between the Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader and<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 8 - Chapter III – Community Background


the Board of Supervisors. This person also oversees maintenance work performed on<br />

the <strong>Township</strong> buildings.<br />

With adoption of this plan comes the ability of the <strong>Township</strong> to collect mandatory<br />

dedicated parklands or fees-in-lieu thereof. This is the best, and most widely-used<br />

method of park system acquisition and development that basically enables municipalities<br />

to keep pace with growth. However, the use of this technique requires expertise on the<br />

specific applicable provisions of the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code that enable it. In<br />

addition, since this technique is applied during the subdivision and land development<br />

process, it forces those involved in the delivery of parks and recreation to become part of<br />

that review process. Finally, specific provisions of the <strong>Township</strong> zoning ordinance<br />

provide incentives for the creation and protection of parklands and open spaces.<br />

All of these “details” will likely strain local staff and officials’ knowledge and<br />

resulting initial use of the mandatory dedication approach. Therefore it is<br />

recommended that the <strong>Township</strong> sponsor a workshop for those involved in the<br />

process to educate all about how to apply this new approach.<br />

This workshop should focus upon:<br />

1. the duties of each person/agency in the review procedures of proposed<br />

developments with dedicated parklands or fees-in-lieu thereof;<br />

2. the specific deadlines imposed upon the development review process;<br />

3. the actual language contained within Sections 402.5.5. and 623 of the <strong>East</strong><br />

<strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance;<br />

4. the language of Section 503.(11) of the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code; and,<br />

5. those various provisions of the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Zoning Ordinance<br />

that provide incentives and design flexibility for the creation and protection<br />

of parklands and open spaces.<br />

This workshop could be presented by the <strong>Township</strong>’s planning consultants, the<br />

<strong>Township</strong>’s Solicitor, the <strong>Township</strong>’s engineer, local officials from adjoining<br />

municipalities who have experience with the process and/or staff from the State.<br />

Even after the conduct of this workshop, the review and approval of a<br />

development proposal can be difficult and require skillful negotiation. Therefore,<br />

it is recommended that the <strong>Township</strong> hire expert development plan review<br />

assistance from planning and engineering experts during the first few proposals<br />

that run through the process. These experts should assist in staff reviews of such<br />

proposals and attend the various Board and Commission hearings where the<br />

actual formal reviews occur. Then once local staff and officials become<br />

comfortable with their duties and roles, these “experts” can be used on an asneeded-basis,<br />

upon request from the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />

It is also important to note the <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Commission will now begin to<br />

play a role in the acquisition and development of parks since they are integral to<br />

the subdivision and land development review process. They too, should<br />

participate in the workshop.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 9 - Chapter III – Community Background


D. <strong>Recreation</strong> Maintenance<br />

Most rural <strong>Township</strong>’s beginning to develop their park system, generally assign park<br />

maintenance duties to general maintenance staff already in place. This is true of <strong>East</strong><br />

<strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> today. The duties of park maintenance are assigned to the Building<br />

and Park Maintenance employee. The job description for this position details daily,<br />

weekly and annual tasks to be performed within the <strong>Township</strong>’s two municipal buildings;<br />

however, no such schedule of routine tasks are provided for park maintenance. It is noted<br />

that the Parks and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader is currently developing such a schedule for<br />

this position.<br />

Also according to the job description, this person is to devote 30 hours per week to park<br />

maintenance during the spring, summer and fall months and 10 hours per week in the<br />

winter; the remaining time is to be spent maintaining the municipal buildings. Therefore<br />

maintenance assignments for parks account for nearly 2/3 of this position’s annual duties.<br />

The following lists the grounds-keeping and facilities responsibilities beyond those<br />

associated with municipal building maintenance specified within this position’s job<br />

description:<br />

1. grass mowing;<br />

2. trimming and weeding around buildings, paths, flowers, shrubs, trees, fences;<br />

3. planting of flowers, trees, shrubs;<br />

4. raking, collection of leaves, twigs, etc.;<br />

5. trimming of shrubbery, trees;<br />

6. mulching of gardens, play areas;<br />

7. fertilizing and seeding lawn areas as needed and as scheduled;<br />

8. cutting dead trees as needed;<br />

9. collecting trash, paper, rubbish, emptying trash receptacles on a regular basis;<br />

10. cleaning of rest rooms on a weekly basis from April to November & winterize in<br />

November;<br />

11. sweeping off athletic courts and pavilion, picnic shelter, gazebo, & amphitheater<br />

floors;<br />

12. raking of sandbox, volleyball court and horseshoe pits as needed;<br />

13. filling of holes in the Park as needed;<br />

14. checking grounds for glass, rocks — especially fitness trails;<br />

15. checking of nature trail and bridges for maintenance and repair;<br />

16. painting/staining of fitness stations, trash receptacles, shuffleboard courts, kiosk,<br />

benches, picnic tables, pavilion, picnic shelter, amphitheater, etc.;<br />

17. inspecting and repairing of all of the above;<br />

18. maintaining tennis courts & nets, basketball court & net, multi-purpose court & nets,<br />

volleyball court & net, soccer fields & nets;<br />

19. inspecting playground, water fountain and rest rooms daily;<br />

20. cleaning and waxing of slide;<br />

21. assisting in the maintenance of the schoolhouse;<br />

22. Keeping sidewalks and parking lots cleared of snow and ice at both buildings. Clear<br />

snow from parking lots at the GVFC station and,<br />

23. Assist the Road Department, if necessary.<br />

This position is to receive municipal building assignments from the <strong>Township</strong> Facilitator and<br />

park assignments from the <strong>Township</strong> Facilitator or the Parks and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader.<br />

Presently the <strong>Township</strong> has a new commercial tractor for park mowing, a smaller garden<br />

tractor and wagon and a variety of lawn/garden and general carpentry tools.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 10 - Chapter III – Community Background


Given the projected growth within the <strong>Township</strong> and the resulting need for additional<br />

scattered neighborhood parks, it is clear that additional maintenance staff will be<br />

required. It is unlikely that volunteer manpower will be able to meet the increasing<br />

needs for maintenance of the expanding park system. The <strong>Township</strong> should<br />

evaluate manpower needs as these new parks come on-line and make necessary<br />

manpower adjustments. The <strong>Township</strong> might also consider negotiating a<br />

maintenance agreement with the School District which likely is better prepared and<br />

equipped to maintain parks on a temporary or permanent basis. Of course the<br />

details would determine the feasibility of this approach. In the end the <strong>Township</strong><br />

must commit the manpower and resources to keep these parks functional, safe and<br />

attractive, whatever approach is selected. Fortunately along with growth will come<br />

additional tax and recreation fee revenues to help offset costs.<br />

With more maintenance staff comes the need for more detailed work tasks and<br />

directions. It is important that the <strong>Township</strong> clearly describe in detail those routine<br />

tasks that will be required to keep the parks in good condition. This should include<br />

a duty-roster of tasks to be completed at regular intervals (eg. daily, weekly,<br />

monthly, seasonally, annually, as needed, etc.) In addition, the maintenance staff<br />

needs to know what constitutes “good condition” for park maintenance. The<br />

<strong>Township</strong> should develop specific descriptions of standards-of-care for each park<br />

and its facilities so that all have the same expectations of what constitutes<br />

acceptable maintenance. These duties should be performed by the Park and<br />

<strong>Recreation</strong> Leader with help from an outside consultant, if required. The <strong>Township</strong><br />

might also look to the School District for help in developing the duty-roster and<br />

standards-of-care.<br />

E. <strong>Recreation</strong> Programs<br />

Despite the <strong>Township</strong>’s rural character, a generous number of recreation programs are<br />

offered for <strong>Township</strong> residents and non-residents.<br />

The largest single program is the Summer <strong>Recreation</strong> Program. This daily (M-F) offering<br />

runs ten weeks in May, June and July of each year. Preschool through 6 th grade children<br />

attend morning playground sessions at the <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park for organized crafts<br />

and sports activities. In addition, extended afternoon sessions are offered twice per week<br />

where participants went bowling and swimming this year. This year’s (2002) program<br />

required the hiring of 14 part-time summer employees to oversee all of the attendees.<br />

Other regularly-scheduled programs include:<br />

1. Toddler classes;<br />

2. Aerobics classes;<br />

3. Kickboxing;<br />

4. Mens basketball;<br />

5. Co-ed volleyball;<br />

6. Health & healing classes;<br />

7. CPR courses; and,<br />

8. Other occasional classes.<br />

Finally, the <strong>Township</strong> hosts a wide variety of special events each year as follows:<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 11 - Chapter III – Community Background


1. Pumpkin carving;<br />

2. Christmas tree lighting;<br />

3. Coloring contests;<br />

4. Window-painting contests;<br />

5. Halloween parade,<br />

6. Craft show;<br />

7. Breakfast with Santa;<br />

8. Breakfast with the <strong>East</strong>er Bunny;<br />

9. Valentines Day and Halloween dances for 6-8 th graders;<br />

10. Valentines Day party for preschoolers through elementary school;<br />

11. Indoor community yard sale;<br />

12. 2 outdoor community yard sales;<br />

13. memorial Day celebration,<br />

14. Peach Festival;<br />

15. Park day festival (the largest event of the year with about 2000 participants in<br />

2001);<br />

16. United Way’s Day of Caring; and,<br />

17. Join Hands Day.<br />

During the Year 2001, the fees collected for all of the <strong>Township</strong>’s programs totaled<br />

just over $13,000. <strong>Township</strong> staff indicates that these program fees are largely<br />

subsidized by general funds of the <strong>Township</strong>. Given the likely increasing demands<br />

for additional programs, staff and park maintenance, the <strong>Township</strong> should begin to<br />

charge fees that cover all of the costs associated with development and conduct of<br />

programs including the costs to provide and maintain the needed facilities. These<br />

fees should be determined by the Park and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader with input from<br />

maintenance personnel and outside experts if necessary. The <strong>Township</strong> cannot<br />

afford the luxury of subsidizing particular recreation programs at the expense of<br />

other system needs.<br />

F. Population & Housing Studies<br />

The allocation of municipal resources, including recreation, must consider the population to<br />

be served. Obviously, the overall size of a population is related to the amount of recreational<br />

services and parklands that must be provided. The historical growth pattern of an<br />

area provides insight as to the growth that might be expected in the future. The following<br />

graph and table lists the amount of population growth that has occurred over the last 30<br />

years within the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 12 - Chapter III – Community Background


Historic Population Growth<br />

8000<br />

7000<br />

6000<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />

Population 2938 3574 4569 5322 6117 6912<br />

Year<br />

From the graph, it is easy to see that the <strong>Township</strong> has experienced steady growth since<br />

1970, at a rate of about 795 new inhabitants each decade. This has increased the<br />

population by about 81% in that time period. Based upon a continuation of this trend, the<br />

<strong>Township</strong>’s population will add approximately 1600 residents between 1990 and 2020.<br />

In addition to population growth, another important consideration when projecting how<br />

fast an area will grow relates to its number of housing units. The following graph and<br />

table lists the number of housing units within the <strong>Township</strong> since the US Census Bureau<br />

began reporting such information in 1970.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 13 - Chapter III – Community Background


Historic Housing Growth<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />

Housing Units 882 1344 1736 2043 2430 2817<br />

Year<br />

Unsurprisingly, the increase in the number of housing units exhibited similar growth<br />

trends as the population except at a faster rate. This difference is expected however,<br />

due to the decreasing family sizes occurring nationwide. Fewer people are living together<br />

as families, and more people are living by themselves. Overall, the <strong>Township</strong> has<br />

added about 387 new units each decade since 1970, representing a 175% increase over<br />

that entire period. This trend is expected to continue and will likely result in about 785 new<br />

dwelling units through 2020.<br />

By using a linear extrapolation technique applied to both population and housing stock<br />

trends since 1970, the following projections are derived; these will form the bases of future<br />

growth area and service needs for the <strong>Township</strong>:<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 14 - Chapter III – Community Background


8000<br />

7000<br />

6000<br />

5000<br />

4000<br />

3000<br />

2000<br />

1000<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong><br />

Historic & Projected Growth<br />

3.5<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

Person/Unit<br />

0<br />

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />

Population 2938 3574 4569 5322 6117 6912<br />

Housing Units 882 1344 1736 2043 2430 2817<br />

Persons/Unit 3.33 2.66 2.63 2.6 2.52 2.45<br />

0<br />

The following tabulates socio-economic data that describes the <strong>Township</strong> that is<br />

available for the Year 2000 US Census of Population & Housing:<br />

Age Group<br />

Age Profile<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />

<strong>Township</strong><br />

Dauphin County<br />

Under 5 years 327 (6.1%) 6.2%<br />

5-9 years 417 (7.8%) 7.0%<br />

10-14 years 430 (8.1%) 7.1%<br />

15-19 years 380 (7.1%) 6.1%<br />

20-24 years 226 (4.2%) 5.4%<br />

25-64 years 3008 (56.5%) 54.0%<br />

65+ years 534 (10.0%) 14.2%<br />

Median age 38.1 years 37.9 years<br />

Comments<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has a higher<br />

percentage of youth through high school age<br />

and middle-age adults than does Dauphin<br />

County. However, it has fewer young adults &<br />

seniors. Overall, it has a slightly higher median<br />

age than all of Dauphin County. However,<br />

none of these differences present particular<br />

consequence for the <strong>Township</strong>’s delivery of<br />

parks and recreation. All of the age cohorts are<br />

represented and should be provided with<br />

opportunities to recreate and play.<br />

Gender<br />

Gender Profile<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />

<strong>Township</strong><br />

Dauphin County<br />

Male 2649 (49.8%) 48.0%<br />

Female 2673 (50.2%) 52.0%<br />

Comments<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has a more balanced<br />

ratio of males to females than does Dauphin<br />

County.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 15 - Chapter III – Community Background


Race<br />

Racial Composition & Latino Origin<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />

<strong>Township</strong><br />

Dauphin County<br />

White 5160 (97.0%) 77.1%<br />

African American 38 (0.7%) 16.9%<br />

Native American 7 (0.1%) 0.2%<br />

Asian 22 (0.4%) 2.0%<br />

Pacific Islander 0 (0%) 0%<br />

Other 37 (0.7%) 2.0%<br />

Multi-racial 58 (0.7%) 1.9%<br />

Hispanic/Latino 101 (1.9%) 4.1%<br />

Comments<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has less racial diversity<br />

than does Dauphin County. Only 2.6% of the<br />

<strong>Township</strong>’s residents describe themselves as<br />

other than “White.” African American, other and<br />

multi-racial groups comprise the <strong>Township</strong>’s<br />

minority population equally. Asians and Native<br />

Americans have comparably fewer<br />

representatives within the <strong>Township</strong>. Similarly,<br />

the <strong>Township</strong> has far fewer residents of<br />

Hispanic/Latino origin than Dauphin County.<br />

Educational Attainment for Persons 25+ Years<br />

Characteristic<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />

<strong>Township</strong><br />

Dauphin County<br />

Under 9th Grade 202 (5.7%) 4.6%<br />

High School Graduate 1455 (41.3%) 37.4%<br />

Associate Degree 268 (7.6%) 6.3%<br />

Bachelors + Degree 733 (20.8%) 23.5%<br />

Comments<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has a greater<br />

percentage of adults who never made it to high<br />

school than does the County as a whole. It<br />

also has fewer numbers of college graduates<br />

and post graduate students than Dauphin<br />

County in general. However, high school<br />

graduation rates within the <strong>Township</strong> and<br />

associate college degrees are more prevalent<br />

than in Dauphin County.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 16 - Chapter III – Community Background


IV. Facilities Inventory<br />

T<br />

he first step in a recreation analysis is an inventory of existing recreation facilities serving the<br />

<strong>Township</strong>’s residents. The inventory on the following pages is a series of tables which lists all<br />

identified recreation sites and their improvements. This inventory indicates the site name, the site's<br />

ownership and maintenance responsibilities, the site type, and its total recreation acreage.<br />

Following this is a specific list of recreation improvements at each site. This list is broken out under<br />

several major subheadings, including playgrounds, fields and courts, picnic facilities, pools, trails,<br />

and support facilities. A final section at the bottom of the table allows for comments concerning a<br />

particular site, or the listing of any additional improvements.<br />

The Parks Map on the following page utilizes the information from the inventory to illustrate the<br />

geographic distribution of all recreation sites within the <strong>Township</strong>, including their types, and<br />

service radii for public-owned facilities.<br />

Panoramic view of <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />

Panoramic view of <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 17 - Chapter IV – Facilities Inventory


Shady Ln.<br />

<strong>East</strong><br />

<strong>Hanover</strong><br />

<strong>Township</strong><br />

Parks<br />

Map<br />

July 5, 2002<br />

Appleby Rd.<br />

Mountain Rd.<br />

McLean Rd.<br />

Mountain Rd.<br />

Angle Rd.<br />

Penn Nartional Ballfield<br />

Fire House Rd.<br />

Manada Bottom Rd.<br />

Binkley's Miniature Golf<br />

Manada Gap Golf Course<br />

Golf Ln.<br />

Private Dr.<br />

Fox Run Rd.<br />

Fox Run Rd.<br />

Fire House Rd.<br />

Furnace Rd.<br />

Ridge Rd.<br />

Ridge Rd.<br />

Station Rd.<br />

I - 81 Ramp<br />

Grantville Fire Co. Carnival Grounds<br />

Bow Creek Rd.<br />

Manada Gap Rd.<br />

Short Dr.<br />

Moyer Rd.<br />

Cliff Rd.<br />

Rabbit Ln.<br />

Rabbit Ln.<br />

I - 81<br />

Dry Run Rd.<br />

Spring Rd.<br />

Faith United Church<br />

US Rt. 22<br />

Kelly Court<br />

North Faith Rd.<br />

N. Fairlane Rd.<br />

Shells Church Rd.<br />

Country Line Rd.<br />

Camp Kiwanis Rd.<br />

I - 81<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park<br />

Red Hill Rd.<br />

Jonestown Rd.<br />

VFW Picnic Grove<br />

San - Jo Dr.<br />

Hill Dr.<br />

US Rt. 22<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />

Laudermilch Rd.<br />

N. Crawford Dr.<br />

W<br />

N<br />

E<br />

Yellowstone Dr.<br />

Hunter Ln.<br />

Red Fox Lm.<br />

N. Mill Rd.<br />

N. Meadow Ln.<br />

Meadow Ln.<br />

Pheasant Rd.<br />

Timber Ridge Rd.<br />

Bunny Ln.<br />

Pheasant Rd.<br />

Dairy Ln.<br />

Sunflower Ln.<br />

Daisy Ln.<br />

Mill Rd.<br />

S<br />

Carter Dr.<br />

Carlson Rd.<br />

Early Mill Rd.<br />

Pineview Dr.<br />

Pine Rd.<br />

S. Crawford Rd.<br />

Parcels<br />

Roads<br />

<strong>Township</strong> Boundaries<br />

Streams<br />

Parks<br />

Community Park<br />

Neighborhood Park<br />

Private Park<br />

Neighborhood Park Service Area<br />

Community Park Service Area<br />

Devonshire Heights Rd.<br />

Sand Beach Rd.<br />

Trail Rd.<br />

Trail Rd.<br />

Amor Dr.<br />

Canal Rd.<br />

High Dr.<br />

Old Laudermilch Rd./ Rt. 743<br />

4000 0 4000 8000 Feet


FACILITIES INVENTORY<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

SITE NAME EHT Municipal Park Elementary School Carnival Grounds<br />

OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE <strong>Township</strong> Lower Dauphin School District Grantville Fire Company<br />

SITE TYPE Community Neighborhood Neighborhood<br />

SITE CONDITION Good Fair Fair<br />

TOTAL ACREAGE (DEVELOPED) 60 (30) 3.9 5.5 ±<br />

PLAYGROUNDS<br />

FIELDS & COURTS<br />

PICNIC<br />

TRAILS<br />

SUPPORT<br />

Swing Sets 1 (4) 1 (2) 1 broken, 2 (22) (10) + tire<br />

Sliding Boards 1 double dinosaur 1<br />

Climbing Equipment 11<br />

Tetherball 2<br />

Sandbox + diggers (2)<br />

Funnelball 1<br />

Rocking Toys<br />

Big Toys 1 1<br />

Hopscotch 1<br />

Four-Square 5<br />

Baseball/Softball Fields 1 w/backstop 2 softball<br />

Soccer/Hockey Fields 2<br />

Football Fields<br />

1 practice<br />

Basketball Courts (hoops) 1 2 need nets<br />

Tennis Courts 2<br />

Volleyball Courts sand 1 grass<br />

Bleachers<br />

Street Hockey<br />

Shuffleboard Courts 2<br />

<br />

Pavilions<br />

1 w/electric & rest rooms +<br />

1 shelter w/o electric & rest rooms<br />

1<br />

Total Picnic Tables (in pavilion) 18 (16) 2 (12)<br />

Barbecue Pits & Grills 3<br />

Benches 16 3<br />

Walking/Exercise Trails (length)<br />

Biking Trails (length)<br />

2/3 mile<br />

Fitness Trails (no. of stations) 1/3 mile (20)<br />

Measured Path<br />

Parking Spaces 2 lots <br />

Rest Rooms 1 portable 2 portable 2<br />

Water Fountains 1<br />

Snack Bar 1<br />

Waste Receptacles 10 5 20<br />

Bike Rack 2<br />

Signs<br />

Other/Comments<br />

park rules<br />

* restored one-room schoolhouse<br />

* amphitheater<br />

* multi-purpose court<br />

* horseshoe pits<br />

* open play area<br />

*indoor multi-purpose room &<br />

meeting rooms<br />

* nature trail<br />

<br />

* old mulch surfaces<br />

* batting cage<br />

* scoreboard<br />

* indoor gym & computer lab<br />

* <strong>Plan</strong>ned expansion: gym, stage,<br />

kitchen, conference room<br />

* bandshell<br />

* grass parking<br />

* arcade building<br />

* open play area w/2 bleachers<br />

* lighted carnival area with<br />

public address system<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 18 - Chapter IV – Facilities Inventory


FACILITIES INVENTORY<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

PLAYGROUNDS<br />

FIELDS & COURTS<br />

PICNIC<br />

TRAILS<br />

SUPPORT<br />

SITE NAME Shellsville VFW Picnic Area Manada Gap Golf Course Mountain Road Driving Range<br />

OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE<br />

VFW – Picnic Area<br />

Baseball Assn. – Ballfields<br />

Private<br />

Private<br />

SITE TYPE Private♦ Public Golf Course Private<br />

SITE CONDITION Good Good Good<br />

TOTAL ACREAGE (DEVELOPED) 38.8 (13±) N/A N/A<br />

Swing Sets 1 (8)<br />

Sliding Boards 1<br />

Climbing Equipment 1<br />

Tetherball<br />

Sandbox<br />

Funnelball<br />

Rocking Toys<br />

Big Toys<br />

Hopscotch<br />

Four-Square<br />

Baseball/Softball Fields<br />

2 w/bleachers & backstop♦<br />

1 w/benches & backstop<br />

Soccer/Hockey Fields<br />

Football Fields<br />

Basketball Courts (hoops)<br />

Tennis Courts<br />

Volleyball Courts 1<br />

Bleachers<br />

Street Hockey<br />

Shuffleboard Courts<br />

Pavilions 3, 1 lighted 1<br />

Total Picnic Tables (in pavilion) 98 (44) 18 4<br />

Barbecue Pits & Grills 1 1<br />

Benches 1<br />

Walking/Exercise Trails (length)<br />

Biking Trails (length)<br />

Fitness Trails (no. of stations)<br />

Measured Path<br />

Parking Spaces <br />

Rest Rooms 2<br />

Water Fountains<br />

Snack Bar 3 1<br />

Waste Receptacles 26 10 2<br />

Bike Rack<br />

Signs<br />

Other/Comments<br />

* creekside<br />

* open play area<br />

* batting cage<br />

* rusty scoreboard<br />

* bandshell<br />

* 2 horseshoe courses<br />

♦These fields directly adjoin the <strong>East</strong><br />

<strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School and are<br />

made available for public use.<br />

* pro shop<br />

* 18-hole golf course<br />

* miniature golf course<br />

* driving range<br />

* batting cages<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 19 - Chapter IV – Facilities Inventory


FACILITIES INVENTORY<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

PLAYGROUNDS<br />

FIELDS & COURTS<br />

PICNIC<br />

TRAILS<br />

SUPPORT<br />

SITE NAME Faith United Church Penn National Ballfield Chesapeake Mobile Home Park<br />

OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE Private Private Private<br />

SITE TYPE Private Private Private<br />

SITE CONDITION Fair Overgrown Poor<br />

TOTAL ACREAGE (DEVELOPED) N/A N/A 0.17<br />

Swing Sets 1 (4) 2 (6)<br />

Sliding Boards 1 2<br />

Climbing Equipment 2 2<br />

Tetherball<br />

Sandbox<br />

Funnelball<br />

Rocking Toys 2<br />

Big Toys<br />

Hopscotch<br />

Four-Square<br />

Baseball/Softball Fields<br />

Soccer/Hockey Fields<br />

Football Fields<br />

1, overgrown<br />

Basketball Courts (hoops) (1) (1)<br />

Tennis Courts<br />

Volleyball Courts<br />

Bleachers<br />

Street Hockey<br />

Shuffleboard Courts<br />

Pavilions 1<br />

Total Picnic Tables (in pavilion) (8)<br />

Barbecue Pits & Grills<br />

Benches<br />

Walking/Exercise Trails (length)<br />

Biking Trails (length)<br />

Fitness Trails (no. of stations)<br />

Measured Path<br />

Parking Spaces<br />

Rest Rooms<br />

Water Fountains<br />

Snack Bar<br />

Waste Receptacles<br />

Bike Rack<br />

Signs<br />

Other/Comments<br />

* open play area w/backstop<br />

* safety surfaces at playground<br />

* small backstop<br />

* rusty scoreboard<br />

* overgrown<br />

* overflowing trash can<br />

* no benches/parking<br />

* no shade<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 20 - Chapter IV – Facilities Inventory


V. Park Analysis & Recommendations<br />

W<br />

ith a complete inventory of parks, it becomes possible to analyze the level of park service<br />

available within <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong>. Within this analysis, every publicly-owned park<br />

and/or recreation facility (<strong>Township</strong> and School District) is identified. Then, its size and service<br />

area is evaluated in relation to its intended service population. Conversely, this analysis also<br />

identifies those areas that lack close, convenient, and safe access to public parkland. Typically,<br />

these evaluations are based upon prescribed standards for park size per 1,000 persons being<br />

served and also for predetermined service radii. The National <strong>Recreation</strong> and Park Association<br />

(NRPA) recommends such standards for various park types that will be applied to evaluate the<br />

allocation and spatial distribution of <strong>Township</strong>’s park system.<br />

Regional parks generally contain 200± acres and are typically located within one hour’s<br />

driving time from the population being served. These parks are generally located throughout a<br />

large metropolitan region, and can accommodate a wide variety of recreational activities. Often,<br />

these parks are owned and operated by the State and Federal government, and in the case of<br />

Pennsylvania, many State Game Lands are included in this category. Regional parks usually have<br />

a natural orientation with hiking, camping, and picnicking facilities. Other “activity-oriented” facilities,<br />

as well as significant historic or archaeological resources, might also be included.<br />

Within Dauphin and Lebanon Counties, several public organizations and private enterprises are<br />

involved with the provision of regional recreation facilities. Within the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> the<br />

northern half is part of the 17,000 acres of the Fort Indiantown Gap which is committed to<br />

environmental stewardship and nature-based recreation opportunities. The following table lists<br />

regional parks within Dauphin and Lebanon Counties.<br />

Regional Parks Serving <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong><br />

Park Ownership<br />

Acres<br />

Dauphin County Parks Department 247+<br />

PA State Game Lands 71,569<br />

Fort Indiantown Gap 17,000<br />

Because the size and cost usually associated with regional parks transcend the responsibilities<br />

of local government, this <strong>Plan</strong> does not recommend any specific actions associated with the<br />

acquisition and development of more regional parks. Instead, this <strong>Plan</strong> will focus upon the<br />

remaining park types that typically are the responsibility of local agencies to provide and<br />

operate.<br />

Community parks usually contain 20± acres and are intended to serve a population within a<br />

2 mile-service radius. They should be sized at the rate of 5 to 8 acres for 1,000 persons served.<br />

These parks generally involve a fairly high level of improvement with multiple sets of athletic fields<br />

and courts. Sometimes swimming pools and indoor recreation centers are situated on these<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 21 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


community-wide parks. Larger school sites (usually middle, and high schools) have the facilities to<br />

qualify as community-based parks, and represent valuable recreation resources that can<br />

significantly enhance the level of recreation services offered to a given area. Finally, sometimes<br />

smaller specialized facilities qualify as community parks due to their use by a larger service area<br />

than that of a neighborhood park.<br />

The <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park is the only community park within the <strong>Township</strong>. This<br />

60-acre park has been the <strong>Township</strong>’s obvious recreation priority over the last decade. About 30<br />

acres is highly developed with a wide variety of active and passive features. It also exhibits<br />

excellent maintenance and care. <strong>Township</strong> residents can surely be proud of this exemplary park<br />

which was partially funded using state grant monies.<br />

Panoramic view of <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park<br />

The Parks Map, following page 17, illustrates the locations and configuration of this community<br />

park in the northwest quadrant of Jonestown and Manada Gap Roads. Additionally, its two-mile<br />

service radius is depicted that blankets most of the <strong>Township</strong>’s “developable” southern half. The<br />

northern half of the <strong>Township</strong> is largely undevelopable due to public ownership, environmental<br />

sensitivity and restrictive zoning.<br />

Next, local officials need to know how much additional community parkland is needed to meet<br />

future demand. Based upon the NRPA guideline of 5 to 8 acres of community parkland for each<br />

1,000 residents and the population projections provided in Chapter III of this <strong>Plan</strong>, the table below<br />

illustrates the community parkland area needed to adequately serve the <strong>Township</strong> now and in the<br />

projected future:<br />

Existing & Projected Community Parkland Needed Within the <strong>Township</strong><br />

NRPA-Recommended Acres<br />

Year Population 5 ac. per 1000<br />

persons<br />

8 ac. per 1000<br />

persons<br />

Existing<br />

Acres<br />

Projected<br />

Surplus<br />

2000 5,322 26.6 42.6 60 +33.4 to +17.4<br />

2010 6,117 30.6 48.9 60 +29.4 to +11.1<br />

2020 6,912 34.6 55.3 60 +25.4 to +4.7<br />

From the preceding table, it is obvious that the <strong>Township</strong> already enjoys a wealth of community<br />

parklands well in excess of the NRPA-recommended minimum standards now and in the<br />

foreseeable future. Furthermore this park’s central geographic location enables it to serve most<br />

of the <strong>Township</strong>’s developing neighborhoods within the recommended 2-mile service radius.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 22 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


The previous acquisition and development of this park will enable the <strong>Township</strong> to focus its<br />

revenues and efforts upon other needed facilities throughout the <strong>Township</strong> in the future.<br />

EHT Municipal Park<br />

Shellsville VFW Picnic Grove<br />

Elementary School<br />

The <strong>Township</strong> should further enhance access to this park that is less reliant upon vehicle<br />

traffic by linking with the <strong>Township</strong>’s planned growth neighborhoods. Specifically, as<br />

depicted on the above aerial photograph, this park is located close to the Shellsville VFW Picnic<br />

Grove and <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School. The VFW property comes within about 250 feet of<br />

the <strong>Township</strong> property across Jonestown Road and one row of houses. From there, a riparian<br />

buffer park/trail could be developed to link to the Elementary School and offer recreational and<br />

educational benefits along the way. According to the Principal at the Elementary School, the<br />

students already explore nature on this site as part of their science curriculum. More about this<br />

subject will be presented in the linear parks section of this <strong>Plan</strong> contained on pages 32-33.<br />

Today it appears that this park offers recreation amenity beyond local demand. The rural<br />

character of the <strong>Township</strong> has yet to produce park users in excess of current facilities; however,<br />

this will change. For the time being <strong>Township</strong> officials do not want to undertake another<br />

campaign of development on the 30 acres of parkland that remains undeveloped.<br />

Instead, they intend to keep these areas in a natural open condition which can be used<br />

informally as open play and practice areas. For these reasons, it is recommended that<br />

future improvements to this park be limited to providing for electricity and lighting<br />

throughout the park. Electricity will enable the amphitheater to offer attractions that require<br />

amplified sound and lighting. Similarly, lighting of the <strong>Township</strong>’s park will enable more efficient<br />

use of the existing facilities without the need for parkland expansion and development. It is<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 23 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


estimated that this project will cost $150,000 which can be entirely funded through mandatory<br />

dedication revenues. At some point in the distant future, the <strong>Township</strong> will likely be<br />

confronted with increased demand for community park facilities and programs from an<br />

enlarged population. At that time an assessment of the, then, prevailing recreation<br />

preferences should guide future development of this site.<br />

Beyond these improvements the following table identifies safety and/or maintenance-related<br />

repairs needed at this site as observed on July 13, 2002:<br />

Safety and Maintenance-Related Improvements Needed to EHT Municipal Park<br />

Item Cost Notes<br />

Repair to Gamefield Holy Spirit Jogging Course<br />

Fasten decking on the footbridge between jogging course station. #7<br />

and #8; repair/replace the broke storm water pipe between station<br />

#12 and #13.<br />

Replace broken molding, repair splintered seat board, and attach<br />

loose ramp deck at gazebo adjacent to school house.<br />

Start a turf maintenance program that includes aeration, fertilizing,<br />

$3000<br />

$200<br />

$100<br />

$2000 - $3000<br />

per year<br />

over seeding and selective weed control at 2 small soccer fields.<br />

Install two new rims and nets at basketball courts. $200<br />

Firmly secure the railings on back of the deck of amphitheater.<br />

$100<br />

Relocate starting and ending points of the nature trail on the south<br />

side of the stream where the best path and most of the stations are<br />

$0<br />

located.<br />

Paint rusted metal parts of older composite playground structure. $100<br />

Mulch surfacing should be routinely raked to maintain adequate<br />

surfacing under all play equipment, eliminate compaction and weed<br />

growth. Additional wood mulch should be added to the play areas.<br />

Remove old swing set next to maintenance building and restore turf. $300<br />

Turf restoration to soccer field including selective weed control,<br />

topdressing, seeding and fertilizing. This should be followed by an<br />

aggressive maintenance program including aeration, fertilizing and<br />

over seeding.<br />

Minor repairs needed to the fencing and seating at baseball diamond.<br />

Routine maintenance is needed to the batting cage area and<br />

improved housekeeping around the backstop area.<br />

The baseball diamond should receive an annual turf maintenance<br />

program including aeration, fertilizing and over seeding.<br />

Construct handicapped parking area and route to the spectator area<br />

for baseball and soccer fields.<br />

Designate the handicapped parking on either side of the access to the<br />

pavilion. Change the water fountain and renovate at least one of the<br />

rest rooms to make it handicapped accessible.<br />

Assumes old signs have been<br />

saved and repairs are<br />

provided by maintenance staff<br />

Performed by maintenance<br />

staff.<br />

Performed as part of<br />

volunteer Day of Caring<br />

$500 For added mulch<br />

Estimated cost<br />

of restoration:<br />

$5,000–7,000<br />

$100<br />

Annual Maintenance: $2,000<br />

$2000-$3000 Annual Maintenance: $2,000<br />

$8000-$10,000<br />

$3000-$5000<br />

Total Safety & Maintenance-Related Costs $32,600<br />

The <strong>Township</strong> should undertake the above repair tasks as a high priority, plus develop<br />

annual maintenance procedures that address the other repairs that occur on an ongoing<br />

basis. Often, local officials can coordinate volunteer efforts among various civic groups<br />

to undertake needed repairs and improvements. Local citizens are generally much more<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 24 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


willing to help fix-up parks than they are to perform other maintenance duties (e.g.,<br />

roads, sewers, etc.). These valuable resources should be explored before the <strong>Township</strong><br />

diverts its maintenance staff from other duties.<br />

Neighborhood parks are the third park type advocated by recreation experts. These parks<br />

are generally between 1 and 20 acres in size and meant to serve a population of 2,000 to 10,000.<br />

The recommended service area for these parks is a one-quarter to one-half mile radius. As implied<br />

by the name, these parks are intended to provide close-to-home areas for limited athletic activities,<br />

playgrounds, and passive pursuits. The NRPA recommends that one to two acres of publiclyowned<br />

land be devoted to neighborhood parks for each 1,000 residents.<br />

Like for community parks, local officials need to know how much neighborhood parkland is needed<br />

to meet current and future demand. Based upon the population projections for the <strong>Township</strong>, the<br />

table below illustrates the neighborhood parkland area needed to adequately serve projected<br />

growth:<br />

Existing & Projected Neighborhood Parkland Needed Within the <strong>Township</strong><br />

NRPA-Recommended Acres<br />

Year Population<br />

1 ac. per 1000 persons 2 ac. per 1000 persons<br />

Existing<br />

Acres<br />

Projected<br />

Surplus/Deficit<br />

2000 5,322 5.3 10.6 13.8 +8.5 to +3.2<br />

2010 6,117 6.1 12.2 13.8 +7.7 to + 1.6<br />

2020 6,912 6.9 13.8 13.8 +6.9 to 0<br />

From an acreage standpoint the <strong>Township</strong> has an adequate amount of neighborhood parkland<br />

now and in the projected future. However in the case of neighborhood parkland, its geographic<br />

location is equally important as its size.<br />

Neighborhood parks must be conveniently accessible by foot to intended users. Based upon:<br />

1. the goals of this plan to focus public facilities and services within planned development<br />

neighborhoods: and,<br />

2. the <strong>Township</strong>’s Zoning Map which depicts a large band of development stretching between<br />

Shellsville on the west to Grantville on the east,<br />

The <strong>Township</strong> should consider 5 different neighborhood park planning areas as follows:<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 25 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


Golf Ln.<br />

Ridge Rd.<br />

Fox Run Rd.<br />

Fire House Rd.<br />

Chesapeake MHP<br />

Station Rd.<br />

I - 81 Ramp<br />

Bow Creek Rd.<br />

Grantville<br />

Manada Gap Rd.<br />

Short Dr.<br />

I - 81<br />

Dry Run Rd.<br />

Jonestown Rd.<br />

Shells Church Rd.<br />

Shellsville<br />

San - Jo Dr.<br />

Hill Dr.<br />

Spring Rd.<br />

Northern Link<br />

US Rt. 22<br />

US Rt. 22<br />

Kelly Court<br />

Southern Link<br />

North Faith Rd.<br />

Country Line Rd.<br />

Laudermilch Rd.<br />

N. Crawford Dr<br />

Pheasant Rd.<br />

Bunny Ln.<br />

Dai<br />

Shellsville Neighborhood<br />

Panoramic view of <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />

The <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School is located in the northwest corner of the intersection of San-<br />

Jo Drive and Shellsville Church Road. This public school is owned and operated by the Lower<br />

Dauphin School District. It has been meeting the needs of school-aged children for decades as<br />

described in the Historical Sketch found on page 6 of this <strong>Plan</strong>. Today this school site has about<br />

3.9 acres devoted to park use. It has youth-oriented playground equipment, two baseball fields, a<br />

football field and a basketball court. Some limited indoor facilities are also available.<br />

It is also important to note that 3 baseball/softball fields that are part of the adjoining Shellsville<br />

VFW Picnic Grove function as part of this park. The VFW has just renewed a 25-year lease with<br />

the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Softball and Baseball Association for their use and maintenance of these fields<br />

through the end of year 2025. Improvements to these fields have been furnished by the<br />

Association with permission by the VFW. Access to these fields occurs across the school property<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 26 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


since the VFW’s driveway is nearly ¼ mile to the west along Crawford Road. The public use of<br />

these ballfields adds another 4.4 acres to this site; this brings the effective size of this park to 8.3<br />

acres.<br />

In addition to student use, the school enables “others” to reserve use of the facilities for various<br />

recreation activities and programs. The School Principal schedules extra-curricular use of the<br />

facilities at minimal fees according to established policies (Policy 707, See Appendix A of this <strong>Plan</strong>)<br />

of the School District. During the 2001 calendar year the following groups made regular use of the<br />

Elementary School:<br />

Group<br />

Fees Paid To<br />

School District<br />

Notes<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Baseball Association $0 Responsible for maintenance of all<br />

infields.<br />

Winter girls basketball league $0<br />

<strong>Township</strong> aerobics classes<br />

<strong>Township</strong> volleyball<br />

<strong>Township</strong> basketball<br />

$160/yr.<br />

$15/yr.<br />

$15/yr.<br />

Local youth soccer $0<br />

The District has finalized plans for renovation and expansion of this School to begin at the end of<br />

the 2002-2003 school year. This project will likely take two years to complete. Presently the plans<br />

depict the addition of a new indoor gymnasium, stage, kitchen and conference room. To<br />

accommodate these new facilities the southern playground area will be relocated or removed<br />

altogether. Given the developed status of this park and its impending improvement, no specific<br />

recommendations are offered for new park amenities at this time. Instead the School District<br />

should focus upon needed repairs and maintenance.<br />

The following table identifies needed safety and/or maintenance-related improvements needed at<br />

this site as observed on July 13, 2002:<br />

Safety and Maintenance-Related Improvements Needed<br />

to <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />

Item Cost Notes<br />

If the school desires to maintain the existing playground equipment,<br />

then a thorough inspection of the equipment should be complete by a<br />

Certified Playground Safety Inspector and the resulting recommended<br />

$1,000 to $1,500.<br />

remediation completed.<br />

Install a border and 12 inches of playground mulch under and around<br />

all play equipment that extends at least 6 feet beyond all equipment.<br />

Surfacing for swings should extend both in front and behind the<br />

suspended seat at least 2 times both the distance measured from the<br />

swing seat to the top bar.<br />

$15,000-$20,000<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 27 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


Safety and Maintenance-Related Improvements Needed<br />

to <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School<br />

Item Cost Notes<br />

If the school believes that the playground equipment contains lead<br />

paint then testing and appropriate remediation should take place. If<br />

the play equipment coatings do not contain lead paint it is still $500<br />

important to have the equipment cleaned and repainted to prevent<br />

deterioration of the metal.<br />

The turf areas of the various athletic fields need an annual turf<br />

maintenance program that includes aeration, fertilization and over<br />

Annual expense: $7,000<br />

Turf restoration<br />

seeding. Significant work is required to the football/soccer field to<br />

to $10,000<br />

$2000-$3000<br />

restore the turf. The skinned infields require routine dragging in order<br />

to prevent growth of vegetation.<br />

Total Safety and Maintenance-Related Costs $25,000<br />

The 1/2-mile neighborhood park service radius that extends from the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary<br />

School and the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park blanket the Village of Shellsville and its<br />

surroundings. These facilities provide for more than ample convenient access to neighborhood<br />

parks in this locale, particularly when one considers the rural character of these areas. It is<br />

estimated that some 588 residents live within the neighborhood service areas for these two parks.<br />

At the NRPA standard, these residents would demand 0.6 to 1.2 areas of neighborhood parkland.<br />

Clearly the <strong>Township</strong> and School District have provided a high level of parks (8.3 acres) within this<br />

vicinity in advance of resident demand. For these reasons it is not recommended that the<br />

<strong>Township</strong> look to acquire additional neighborhood parkland in and around the Village of<br />

Shellsville until such time as its population grows to more than 4000. Instead the <strong>Township</strong><br />

should look to link these parks via the proposed Village Link Trail and make repairs to the<br />

school and VFW ballfields that improve service. This may mean that revenues collected by<br />

the <strong>Township</strong> would be provided to the School District/VFW to improve the facility. It is<br />

noted that the <strong>Township</strong> is currently cooperating with the School District in the preparation of a<br />

Regional Comprehensive <strong>Plan</strong>. It is likely that such financial cooperation will also be a<br />

recommendation from that effort as neighboring municipalities and the School District look to<br />

improve services and reduce the costs of duplication.<br />

Northern Link Neighborhood<br />

The second neighborhood is located between Shellsville to the west and Grantville on the east. It<br />

is also sandwiched between Jonestown Road on the north and commercial uses fronting US Route<br />

22 on the south. This planned neighborhood is largely undeveloped at this time with approximately<br />

78 residents. However, the zoning for this area would accommodate about 3000 new residents at<br />

full buildout under the <strong>Township</strong>’s Village Overlay Zone. This would generate an ultimate<br />

neighborhood park size of 6 acres assuming the NRPA’s 2-acres per 1000 population<br />

standard. The <strong>Township</strong> should acquire land via mandatory dedication for these acres and<br />

also collect fees-in-lieu thereof to be applied to this neighborhood park’s development. In<br />

addition, the <strong>Township</strong> should also use the mandatory dedication process to acquire a<br />

linear park to connect Shellsville and Grantville through this neighborhood. This linear<br />

park should be a design priority expressed to any would-be developer in this neighborhood<br />

early in their land development review process so that they can make use of the <strong>Township</strong>’s<br />

flexible design options to incorporate this feature amid the proposed development. The<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 28 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


following presents a typical schedule of improvements associated with this proposed<br />

neighborhood park:<br />

“Typical” 6-Acre Neighborhood Park Improvements<br />

1. 6-acre neighborhood park;<br />

2. a multi-purpose (soccer/baseball) athletic field;<br />

3. a modular playground with safety surfaces;<br />

4. 6-table picnic pavilion/tables/BBQ grills/waste receptacles;<br />

5. 20-space parking lot;<br />

6. 2 basketball courts;<br />

7. 1 sand volleyball court;<br />

8. 8 park benches;<br />

9. bike rack;<br />

10. landscaping and shade trees;<br />

11. park sign;<br />

12. contingency, bonding, and design costs (20% of improvement costs)<br />

Total Improvement Costs<br />

Estimated Cost<br />

$240,0000<br />

$48,000<br />

$30,000<br />

$8,100<br />

$19,140<br />

$75,200<br />

$8,000<br />

$4,000<br />

$500<br />

$16,000<br />

$4,000<br />

$42,588<br />

$495,528<br />

Southern Link Neighborhood<br />

The third neighborhood is separated from the others within the <strong>Township</strong> by US Route 22.<br />

Specifically this area is situated on the west side of Laudermilch Road south of commercial<br />

properties fronting the highway. This neighborhood acknowledges a recently proposed “Preserve<br />

at Bow Creek” development of up to 162 dwelling units on 122 acres under the <strong>Township</strong>’s former<br />

cluster development zoning provisions. The clustering provisions require generous amounts of<br />

open space; therefore, the applicant should have little difficulty providing the needed 1-acre<br />

neighborhood park for this area. In fact, the <strong>Township</strong> should attempt to collect fees-in-lieu of land<br />

in this development so as to provide for adequate improvements to the raw acreage. Other monies<br />

collected in the nearby rural areas of the <strong>Township</strong> could also be applied to help fund development<br />

of this site. The following presents a typical schedule of improvements associated with this<br />

proposed neighborhood park:<br />

“Typical” 1- Acre Neighborhood Park Improvements<br />

1. 1-acre neighborhood park;<br />

2. a modular playground with safety surfaces;<br />

3. 6-table picnic pavilion/tables/BBQ grills/waste receptacles;<br />

4. 1 basketball courts;<br />

5. 1 sand volleyball court;<br />

6. 4 park benches;<br />

7. bike rack;<br />

8. landscaping and shade trees;<br />

9. park sign;<br />

10. contingency, bonding, and design costs (20% of improvement costs)<br />

Total Improvement Costs<br />

Estimated Cost<br />

$0, required under cluster ordinance<br />

$30,000<br />

$8,100<br />

$40,000<br />

$8,000<br />

$2,000<br />

$500<br />

$2500<br />

$1,000<br />

$18,420<br />

$110,520<br />

Grantville Neighborhood<br />

This neighborhood is anchored by the Village of Grantville and extends from Interstate 81 on the<br />

north and commercial properties fronting US Route 22 on the south. Today, this neighborhood<br />

houses about 275 residents; however, its combination of Village Residential and Residential<br />

Medium Density zoning could swell this population to about 2050 with full buildout under the Village<br />

Overlay Zone. Today, this neighborhood should have a neighborhood park with the minimum 1-<br />

acre as recommended by the NRPA. At full buildout, it should have a 4.1-acre neighborhood park.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 29 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


The Grantville Fire Company’s Carnival<br />

Grounds are located here. This 5.5-acre site<br />

has a rich history within the <strong>Township</strong> that<br />

dates back to the late 1940’s when the first<br />

town carnivals were held. This park is located<br />

on the west side of Firehouse Road just north<br />

of the Grantville Post Office. While this park<br />

satisfies the criteria for a neighborhood park it<br />

doesn’t really function in that capacity at the<br />

same level as the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary<br />

School. To the contrary, this park is more<br />

typical to rural communities where parks and<br />

recreation are not a priority. Here some<br />

limited playground facilities and two basketball<br />

hoops offer some amenity and a large open Bandshell at Carnival Grounds<br />

play area can be used for informal pick-up games. But this site’s primary function is to serve the<br />

summer carnival. A ½-acre lighted carnival area is bounded on one side by the bandshell shown in<br />

the adjoining photograph and an arcade-stand style building on the other from which vendors and<br />

amusements operate. Presumably the open play area is used for parking during the carnival. A<br />

small picnic pavilion and rest rooms are also available on the site.<br />

The <strong>Township</strong> should focus on acquiring land via mandatory dedication for a new<br />

neighborhood park amid a proposed development. It should be centrally located,<br />

preferably just north of the existing Village so as to provide maximum pedestrian<br />

accessibility to existing and future residents. Fees-in-lieu thereof should also be applied to<br />

this neighborhood park’s development. In addition, the <strong>Township</strong> should also use the<br />

mandatory dedication process to acquire a linear park to connect this neighborhood with<br />

the proposed linear park from the Northern Link and Shellsville neighborhoods. This linear<br />

park should be a design priority expressed to any would-be developer in this neighborhood<br />

early in their land development review process so that they can make use of the <strong>Township</strong>’s<br />

flexible design options to incorporate this feature amid the proposed development. The<br />

following presents a typical schedule of improvements associated with this proposed<br />

neighborhood park:<br />

“Typical” 4-Acre Neighborhood Park Improvements<br />

1. 4.1-acre neighborhood park;<br />

2. a multi-purpose (soccer/baseball) athletic field;<br />

3. a modular playground with safety surfaces;<br />

4. 6-table picnic pavilion/tables/BBQ grills/waste receptacles;<br />

5. 20-space parking lot;<br />

6. 2 basketball courts;<br />

7. 1 sand volleyball court;<br />

8. 8 park benches;<br />

9. bike rack;<br />

10. landscaping and shade trees;<br />

11. park sign;<br />

12. contingency, bonding, and design costs (20% of improvement costs)<br />

Total Improvement Costs<br />

Estimated Cost<br />

$164,000<br />

$48,000<br />

$30,000<br />

$8,100<br />

$19,140<br />

$75,200<br />

$8,000<br />

$4,000<br />

$500<br />

$16,000<br />

$4,000<br />

$42,588<br />

$419,528<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 30 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


Chesapeake MHP Neighborhood<br />

A final neighborhood is located on the northeast quadrant of the Interstate 81 interchange at<br />

Grantville. Here a large mobile home park has existed for many years. Today, there are about 360<br />

units resulting in a population of about 936. Consequently this neighborhood should be fitted with a<br />

1.9-acre neighborhood park in the near future. It is noted that the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Mobile<br />

Home Park Ordinance requires that a minimum of 200 square feet of recreation area be provided<br />

for each mobile home; this would generate about 1.65 acres of parkland. However, the play area<br />

depicted on the mobile home park’s development plan only depicts 0.17 acres devoted to play<br />

area. Consequently, this neighborhood suffers a 1.7-acre deficit today. Furthermore, the residual<br />

development of this neighborhood in this neighborhood is estimated to accommodate an additional<br />

500 mobile homes at full buildout. This would require an ultimate neighborhood park size of 4.5<br />

acres. The <strong>Township</strong> should provide for a 1.9-acre developed neighborhood park in the<br />

short term. Then, when future expansion plans occur, the developer should be required to<br />

enlarge the park accordingly under Section 6.6 of the <strong>Township</strong> Mobile Home Park<br />

Ordinance. At that time, the fee-in-lieu of mandatory dedication should be used to equip this<br />

expanded park with needed additional improvements.<br />

“Typical” 1.9- Acre Neighborhood Park Improvements<br />

1. 1.9-acre neighborhood park;<br />

2. a modular playground with safety surfaces;<br />

3. 6-table picnic pavilion/tables/BBQ grills/waste receptacles;<br />

4. 1 basketball courts;<br />

5. 1 sand volleyball court;<br />

6. 4 park benches;<br />

7. bike rack;<br />

8. landscaping and shade trees;<br />

9. park sign;<br />

10. contingency, bonding, and design costs (20% of improvement costs)<br />

Total Improvement Costs<br />

Estimated Cost<br />

$76,000<br />

$30,000<br />

$8,100<br />

$40,000<br />

$8,000<br />

$2,000<br />

$500<br />

$2500<br />

$1,000<br />

$18,420<br />

$186,520<br />

Linear parks are also gaining in popularity throughout the nation as less and less open<br />

space remains within developing areas. The <strong>Township</strong> has an abundance of existing and<br />

planned linear parks. The following will discuss each linear park separately.<br />

Appalachian Trail - As depicted on the Parks Map found following page 17, the Appalachian<br />

Trail traverses the <strong>Township</strong> along its entire length of 2160 miles from Katahdin, Maine to<br />

Springer Mountain, Georgia. This trail is one of the nation’s longest and oldest continuously<br />

marked footpaths that is believed to have originated sometime around 1921. Locally the trail<br />

follows an overland path in a northwest/southeast direction just under 1 mile. It is entirely upon<br />

lands of the Fort Indiantown Gap and connects with the Horseshoe Trail about midway across<br />

the <strong>Township</strong>. Although the trail is located within the <strong>Township</strong>, pedestrian access is not<br />

immediately available within <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong>. Instead hikers must access the trail in<br />

adjoining Middle Paxton <strong>Township</strong> via the Horseshoe Trail. <strong>Township</strong> Officials should monitor<br />

activities of the Appalachian Trail Conference and cooperate with their initiatives. More<br />

information can be found at their homepage at the following Internet address:<br />

http://www.fred.net/kathy/at.html<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 31 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


Horseshoe Trail – The <strong>Township</strong> is fortunate to have a trailhead of the Horseshoe Trail on<br />

Stony Mountain along its northern ridge. This 121-mile trail extends to Valley Forge. The trail<br />

begins about 1.2 miles east of the <strong>Township</strong>’s western boundary and follows the Appalachian<br />

Trail west into adjoining Middle Paxton<br />

<strong>Township</strong>. It re-enters <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong><br />

<strong>Township</strong> upon the Fort Indiantown<br />

Gap property and follows an overland<br />

course to Mountain Road. Here the<br />

trail follows:<br />

• Mountain Road to Ridge Road;<br />

• Ridge Road to Cliff Road;<br />

• Cliff Road to Rabbit Lane;<br />

• Rabbit Lane to Jonestown Road;<br />

• Jonestown Road to North Mill Road;<br />

• North Mill Road to Carson Road;<br />

• Carson Road to Sand Beach Road;<br />

• Sand Beach Road to Early Mill Road;<br />

• Early Mill Road to Trail Road; and,<br />

• Trail Road to Canal Road where it exits<br />

the <strong>Township</strong> on the south.<br />

Local Horseshoe Trail Alignment<br />

Local officials within the <strong>Township</strong> should seek ways to<br />

protect and incorporate this valuable resource within its<br />

overall park and open space system and programs.<br />

Development plans proposed along this trail should<br />

seek to relocate the trail away from the road and provide<br />

the overland alignment by designing developments that<br />

respect its integrity and use. Density bonuses through<br />

zoning and cluster developments can be used to<br />

incentivize this process. More information about the<br />

Horseshoe Trail monument<br />

Horseshoe Trail can be found at the following website:<br />

to founder Henry N. Wollman<br />

http://www.n99.com/hst/index.html<br />

in Valley Forge at trailhead.<br />

PA State Gamelands No. 211 Abandoned Railroad R.O.W. – An abandoned railroad right-ofway<br />

passes through the <strong>Township</strong> within Stony Valley along the Stony Creek. This public trail<br />

originates at Stony Creek Road in Middle Paxton <strong>Township</strong> near Dauphin Borough in Dauphin<br />

County. The trail extends some 17 miles (3 miles within <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong>) to the west<br />

where it terminates along Gold Mine Road in Cold Spring <strong>Township</strong>, Lebanon County. A mid<br />

access point is also available at Cold Springs Road at the Fort Indiantown Gap. One day in the fall<br />

(usually the second Sunday in October) the Game Commission permits motorized vehicles to use<br />

the trail for its “Gamelands Tour” to view the fall foliage; otherwise the trail is for pedestrians,<br />

mountain bikes and horseback riders. The motorized tour is a one-way trip from west to east and<br />

is advertised in local newspapers a few weeks prior to the event. This trail passes along the Devil’s<br />

Race Course and Rattling Run, two scenic geologic features important within the Region.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 32 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


Proposed Village Link Trail – The <strong>Township</strong> hopes to develop a new Village Link Trail that would<br />

from west to east:<br />

• Connect to the Horseshoe Trail at North Mill Road;<br />

• Follow Jonestown Road to the <strong>Township</strong> Municipal Park;<br />

• Turn south onto Crawford Road and enter the Shellsville VFW Picnic Grove;<br />

• Establish a riparian buffer trail along the creek on the VFW site;<br />

• Connect with the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School;<br />

• Integrate with new neighborhoods to be developed between Shellsville and Grantville;<br />

• Link to the new neighborhood park to be located within the Northern Link neighborhood;<br />

• Continue into Grantville and provide access to the Grantville Fire Company Carnival Grounds;<br />

• Terminate at the new neighborhood park to be built within the Village of Grantville.<br />

In all, this proposed trail would run about 4.2 miles and connect 7 of the public and private parks<br />

located within the <strong>Township</strong>. With a 20-feet-wide right-of-way, this trail would consume about 10.2<br />

acres of land. It would also have the benefit of delivering recreation to the doorstep of residents<br />

within the existing and future neighborhoods. For these reasons it is recommended that the local<br />

officials incorporate this trail into its developing landscape by requiring developers to<br />

complete segments of the trail that pass through their proposed developments and provide<br />

for logical local connections to it. Again, density bonuses for development plans with these<br />

features plus flexible cluster design standards can help developers and local government<br />

partners in the provision of these features. In addition, local public facilities projects (e.g.,<br />

roads, drainage, parks, etc.) should similarly include measures to protect and develop the<br />

trail with suitable use and access features.<br />

Preliminarily a trail must incorporate a design that accommodates its intended use. Trails that<br />

serve urban neighborhoods, like the one proposed, should accommodate an “urban” level of<br />

activity with hikers, bikers, wheelchairs, strollers, cross-country skiers and in-line skaters.<br />

These urban users and the proposed trail’s location partially within the floodplain suggest<br />

certain design specifications. All of the following design features should be more deliberately<br />

defined and applied during a Phase 1 Trail Feasibility Study described later:<br />

• 10-foot wide concrete walkway that is graded to keep water off of the trail surface;<br />

• 2-foot wide graded shoulders to protect paved edges and permit proper drainage;<br />

• 3-foot-wide clearance on either side of the trail from overhanging tree canopies;<br />

• elevated boardwalks across wetlands with necessary permits; and<br />

• demonstrated compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act for the trail and its related<br />

amenities (parking, access, waste receptacles, tables, benches, water fountains, etc.).<br />

Finally, the trail’s connection with public roads requires special attention; consequently the<br />

proposed trail should:<br />

• be cleared of vegetation that would interfere with adequate sight distance;<br />

• add painted crosswalks and road lane markings;<br />

• add trail crossing warning signs along the trail and road (in both directions); and,<br />

• add bollards on the trail at least 20 feet from the street cartway.<br />

The plotting of a potential trail on a map is but the beginning point to a lengthy and potentially<br />

difficult process that ends in trail development and use. Many pitfalls can “derail” this process and<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 33 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


prevent trail completion. Nonetheless, these trails have become one of society’s popular priorities<br />

and therefore, funding for feasibility studies is readily available.<br />

For this reason, it is recommended that the <strong>Township</strong>, School District and VFW of<br />

Shellsville submit a joint application under the Pennsylvania <strong>Recreation</strong>al Trails Program.<br />

The PA DCNR offers an 80%-State to 20%-local matching grant for such studies under its<br />

Community Conservation Program. According to their staff, these grants are usually<br />

undertaken in three successive phases as follows:<br />

Phase 1 - Trail Feasibility – Determine overall feasibility of trail by analyzing a variety of<br />

natural and cultural conditions, anticipated modes, frequency and duration of use,<br />

opportunities and threats to trail development, development options and an implementation<br />

plan. In addition, this plan should specifically include master plans for the various needed<br />

trail improvements (e.g., bridges, signs, street crossings, trail retaining walls, floodproofed<br />

walkways, etc.)<br />

Phase 2 - Trail Acquisition – Based upon expected use and level of improvement, identify<br />

various techniques for access to the trail from outright purchase of rights-of-way to securing<br />

use easements. Matching grants for actual acquisition based upon professional appraisal<br />

standards and verified by state certified general real estate appraisers, plus related<br />

expenses (e.g., appraisals, environmental assessments, boundary surveys, title searches,<br />

title insurance, and settlement costs).<br />

Phase 3 - Trail Development – Design and installation of surfaces, bridges, underpasses,<br />

retaining wall, trail maps and signs. Construction materials and activities must be publicly<br />

advertised, bid and awarded in accordance with applicable laws.<br />

More information about the State grant program can be found at the following website:<br />

http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/recreation/grants/rectrails.htm<br />

Manada and Swatara Creek Riparian Buffers and Facilities – Two of the<br />

goals articulated for this plan relate to the protection of two of the <strong>Township</strong>’s important creeks.<br />

The Manada Creek is an important trout fishery and the Swatara Creek is part of a large<br />

regional Swatara Creek Greenway. To provide protection to the water quality for both of these<br />

creeks and avoid the hazards of floodplain development, it is recommended that the <strong>Township</strong><br />

undertake two actions.<br />

First, <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> should strengthen its floodplain management regulations.<br />

It is noted that the pending proposed revisions to the zoning ordinance would<br />

accomplish this objective and should be adopted.<br />

Second, while protection of floodplains and wetlands are widely accepted land use<br />

management techniques, recent awareness of diminishing surface water quality suggests<br />

the need for more protection. Studies conducted by the U.S. Forest Service demonstrate<br />

that riparian buffers offer real advantages in the removal of harmful nutrients and sediment<br />

from storm water before it enters the stream. These same riparian buffers can increase the<br />

food supply and create interconnected natural systems of movement for local wildlife.<br />

Riparian buffers are areas adjoining streams where naturally successive vegetation is<br />

provided and protected.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 34 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


The Riparian Buffers Map on the next page composites the <strong>Township</strong>’s creeks and streams with<br />

a recommended riparian buffer. The riparian buffer includes a 90-foot wide radius from the<br />

streambanks. This width is recommended by the USDA Department of Forestry, based upon<br />

the climatic conditions of this area to sustain natural streamside buffers. As the map reveals, all<br />

of the <strong>Township</strong>s tributaries, streams and creeks are shown with a riparian buffer. It is estimated<br />

that 85% of all surface water occurs in smaller streams and creeks. Therefore, the inclination of<br />

society to focus upon water quality of larger streams, creeks, rivers, and bays is defective. It is<br />

vital that surface water quality of small stream headwaters and low-order tributaries becomes<br />

our priority. Without such measures, our higher order creeks and rivers are threatened by poor<br />

surface water quality. Surface water quality is a direct function of the interaction between water<br />

and the land and vegetation through which it flows. The greatest interaction occurs within lower<br />

order streams. Within high order streams and rivers, water is principally contributed from<br />

tributaries rather than the adjoining streamside areas; therefore, the opportunity for water quality<br />

improvement is minimal. For example, no overhead tree canopy could possibly span the width<br />

of the Susquehanna River and reduce itssummer water temperature. On the other hand, a welldesigned<br />

treed landscape along a low order stream can offer direct water quality benefit to the<br />

adjoining property owner and those located downstream.<br />

Essentially, riparian buffers comprise three distinct zones, as depicted below. The following will<br />

describe where to establish, and how to plant and maintain each of these three zones:<br />

Zone 1 is the landward area located between the streambank edge under typical flow conditions,<br />

and the largest width of any of the following:<br />

• fifteen (15) feet, as measured directly perpendicular from the streambank edge;<br />

• the 100-year floodplain;<br />

• any adjoining identified wetlands; and/or,<br />

• any adjoining area characterized by slopes exceeding twenty-five percent (25%).<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 35 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


x<br />

<strong>East</strong><br />

<strong>Hanover</strong><br />

<strong>Township</strong><br />

Riparian<br />

Buffers<br />

August 28, 2002<br />

Mountain Rd.<br />

Appleby Rd.<br />

McLean Rd.<br />

Mountain Rd.<br />

Angle Rd.<br />

Manada Bottom Rd.<br />

Furnace Rd.<br />

Ridge Rd.<br />

Golf Ln.<br />

x<br />

Private Dr.<br />

Fox Run Rd.<br />

Fire House Rd.<br />

Fox Run Rd.<br />

Fire House Rd.<br />

Ridge Rd.<br />

Station Rd.<br />

W<br />

N<br />

S<br />

E<br />

x<br />

Moyer Rd.<br />

Camp Kawanis Rd.<br />

I - 81<br />

Cliff Rd.<br />

Rabbit Ln.<br />

Yellowstone Dr.<br />

Rabbit Ln.<br />

N. Fairlane Rd.<br />

Hunter Ln.<br />

Red Fox Lm.<br />

Red Hill Rd.<br />

N. Mill Rd.<br />

Manada Gap Rd.<br />

N. Meadow Ln.<br />

I - 81<br />

Dry Run Rd.<br />

Jonestown Rd.<br />

x<br />

N. Crawford Dr.<br />

Shells Church Rd.<br />

Meadow Ln.<br />

San - Jo Dr.<br />

Hi l Dr.<br />

Spring Rd.<br />

Pheasant Rd.<br />

Timber Ridge Rd.<br />

Bow Creek Rd.<br />

US Rt. 22<br />

Bunny Ln.<br />

Pheasant Rd.<br />

Kelly Court<br />

US Rt. 22<br />

x<br />

x<br />

x<br />

Short Dr.<br />

North Faith Rd.<br />

Laudermilch Rd.<br />

Country Line Rd.<br />

Dairy Ln.<br />

Sunflower Ln.<br />

Daisy Ln.<br />

Carter Dr.<br />

Mill Rd.<br />

Carlson Rd.<br />

Early Mill Rd.<br />

Pineview Dr.<br />

Pine Rd.<br />

S. Crawford Rd.<br />

Shady Ln.<br />

Trail Rd.<br />

Devonshire Heights Rd.<br />

Trail Rd.<br />

Canal Rd.<br />

Old Laudermilch Rd./ Rt. 743<br />

Sand Beach Rd.<br />

High Dr.<br />

Amor Dr.<br />

Douglas Rd.<br />

Parcels<br />

<strong>Township</strong> Boundaries<br />

Streams<br />

Riparin Buffers<br />

1200 0 1200 2400 Feet<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 36 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


This Zone must include mature canopy trees and a ground cover of warm season grasses.<br />

New tree plantings should be selected, arranged and managed to accelerate canopy<br />

growth, and offer native species habitat and food supply. New grass plantings should be<br />

selected and managed to filter-out pollutants and offer habitat. All vegetation within this<br />

Zone must thrive in wet conditions. Zone 1 requires little maintenance. As trees mature, die<br />

and decay, it is important that such natural debris be allowed to decompose within the<br />

stream. This will provide important food and habitat for beneficial microorganisms, fish and<br />

amphibians. Streamside grasses should similarly be allowed to seasonally flourish and<br />

recede. Manmade activities should be very limited and confined to perpendicular passages<br />

from Zone 2. Intensively-used locations should be fitted with raised walkways and<br />

reinforced embankments. Streamside cleanup of junk and manmade debris is permitted. No<br />

animal watering and crossing locations are permitted, unless they are reinforced.<br />

Zone 2 begins at the inland edge of the above-described Zone 1 and extends at least sixty (60)<br />

feet inland therefrom. This Zone must also include mature canopy trees generally three rows<br />

deep, and a natural undercover. New tree plantings should be selected that grow rapidly, so as<br />

to intercept passing nutrients. Such trees should also be arranged and managed to accelerate<br />

canopy growth, and offer native species habitat and food supply. Successive undercover plants<br />

should also be allowed to “evolve” with the canopy of this Zone. This Zone requires the most<br />

attention, but not for some time after initial planting. Here, the objective is to develop a stable<br />

and broad canopy of tree cover. The trees within Zone 2 are fast-growing and, therefore,<br />

consume many nutrients. The regular pruning and trimming of these trees will increase their<br />

nutrient consumption, but should not jeopardize the important overhead canopy of shade. The<br />

natural undercover should be undisturbed, except for periodic litter cleanup. Pedestrian paths<br />

can weave through Zone 2, but should be provided to prevent compacted soils and root<br />

damage.<br />

Zone 3 begins at the inland edge of the above-described Zone 2, and extends at least<br />

fifteen (15) feet inland therefrom. Where a pasture is proposed just beyond the abovedescribed<br />

Zone 2, no Zone 3 is required. This Zone should be planted with warm season<br />

grasses that are allowed to mature naturally without mowing. The tall grasses ensure that<br />

overland storm water flows do not “channel” into Zone 2. New grass plantings should be<br />

selected and managed to enable controlled grazing or haying, so long as the grasses are<br />

not reduced to a point where they are no longer able to effectively disperse the surface<br />

water flows. This Zone also requires little maintenance. Long summer grasses should be<br />

allowed to flourish and recede with the seasons. Grazing and haying is permitted, so long as<br />

the residual grass length is sufficient to disperse overland storm water flows into Zone 2 and<br />

avoid channelization.<br />

Riparian Buffer Use and Maintenance - Streamside buffers must be generally undisturbed.<br />

Mature trees and long grasses absorb more nutrients than do manicured plants. Similarly, the more<br />

extensive root systems retain passing sediments. These characteristics reduce pollution and yield<br />

abundant food and habitat for wildlife. The temptation to “over-maintain” the streamside must be<br />

overcome.<br />

Local officials should educate landowners and developers of the importance of riparian<br />

buffers, and the <strong>Township</strong>’s intent to provide for them. Newsletter articles should be used<br />

occasionally to introduce these concepts, and then to feature successful implementation<br />

examples as they occur. The sample riparian buffer ordinance contained on the next page<br />

should be incorporated into the <strong>Township</strong> Zoning Ordinance.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 37 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


Sample Regulations for Riparian Buffers<br />

As required within this Ordinance, and as guidance to any other landowner that voluntarily proposes, streamside buffers shall be provided in<br />

accordance with the following standards:<br />

Buffer Delineation – The applicant must submit a scaled site plan that clearly depicts the streamside buffer comprised of the following three<br />

separate Zones:<br />

Zone 1 – The landward area located between the<br />

streambank edge under typical flow conditions and<br />

the largest combined width of all of the following:<br />

• fifteen (15) feet as measured directly perpendicular<br />

from the streambank edge;<br />

• the 100-year floodplain;<br />

• any adjoining identified wetlands; and/or,<br />

• any adjoining area characterized by slopes<br />

exceeding twenty-five percent (25%).<br />

Zone 2 – The area beginning at the inland edge of<br />

the above-described Zone 1 and extending at least<br />

sixty (60) feet inland therefrom; and,<br />

Zone 3 – The area beginning at the inland edge of the above-described Zone 2 and extending at least fifteen (15) feet inland therefrom. Where<br />

a pasture is proposed just beyond the above-described Zone 2, no Zone 3 is required;<br />

Buffer <strong>Plan</strong>tings – Each of the respective Zones of the streamside buffer shall include vegetation that already exists or will be planted and<br />

maintained by the applicant that satisfies the following design objectives. The applicant shall submit expert evidence that the existing and/or proposed<br />

vegetation satisfies such objectives:<br />

Zone 1 – This Zone must include mature canopy trees and a ground cover of warm season grasses. New tree plantings should be selected, arranged<br />

and managed to accelerate canopy growth, and offer native species habitat and food supply. New grass plantings should be selected and managed<br />

to filter-out pollutants and offer habitat. All vegetation within this Zone must thrive in wet conditions;<br />

Zone 2 - This Zone must include mature canopy trees generally three rows deep and a natural undercover. New tree plantings should be selected<br />

that are rapid growing so as to intercept passing nutrients. Such trees should also be arranged and managed to accelerate canopy growth, and offer<br />

native species habitat and food supply. Successive undercover plants should also be allowed to “evolve” with the canopy of this Zone;<br />

Zone 3 – This Zone should be planted with warm season grasses that are allowed to mature naturally without mowing. The tall grasses ensure that<br />

overland storm water flows do not “channel” into Zone 2. New grass plantings should be selected and managed to enable controlled grazing or haying<br />

so long as the grasses are not reduced to a point where they are no longer able to effectively disperse the surface water flows.<br />

Buffer Use and Maintenance – Streamside buffers must be generally undisturbed. Mature trees and long grasses absorb more nutrients than do<br />

manicured plants. Similarly the more extensive root systems retain passing sediments. These characteristics reduce pollution and yield abundant<br />

food and habitat for wildlife. The temptation to “over-maintain” the streamside must be overcome. The following lists required maintenance activities<br />

for each Zone and the applicant must present a working plan that demonstrates compliance with such activities and practices:<br />

Zone 1 – This Zone compels requires little maintenance. As trees mature, die and decay it is important that such natural debris be allowed to<br />

decompose within the stream. This will provide important food and habitat for beneficial microorganisms, fish and amphibious animals. Streamside<br />

grasses should similarly be allowed to seasonally flourish and recede. Manmade activities should be very limited and confined to perpendicular<br />

passages from Zone 2. Intensive-used locations should be fitted with raised walkways and reinforced embankments. Streamside cleanup of junk and<br />

manmade debris is permitted. No animal watering and crossing locations are permitted.<br />

Zone 2 – This Zone requires the most attention but not for some time after initial planting. Here the objective is to develop a stable and broad canopy<br />

of tree cover. The trees within Zone 2 are fast-growing and therefore consume many nutrients. The regular pruning and trimming of these trees will<br />

increase their nutrient consumption, but should not jeopardize the important overhead canopy of shade. The natural undercover should be<br />

undisturbed except for periodic litter cleanup. Pedestrian paths can weave through Zone 2 but should be provided with raised walkways to prevent<br />

compacted soils and root damage.<br />

Zone 3 – This Zone also requires little maintenance. Long summer grasses should be allowed to flourish and recede with the seasons. Grazing and<br />

haying is permitted so long as the residual grass length is sufficient to disperse overland storm water flows into Zone 2 and avoid channelization.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 38 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


But zoning regulations alone will not get this job done, as most land uses don’t require zoning<br />

approval to continue to operate. In these areas, other options exist. First, the PA Game Commission<br />

offers its Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP). Landowners adjoining<br />

streams are offered annual rental payments of $56 to over $200 per acre for<br />

managed streamside buffers. The program is proposed to continue for 10-15 years. In<br />

addition to the rental payments, landowners are eligible for 100% cost share<br />

reimbursement for installation of suitable vegetation within these buffers. Enrollment in<br />

this program remains open through September 30, 2002, or until the State’s 100,000-acre goals<br />

are achieved. <strong>Township</strong> officials should mount a campaign to inform local landowners<br />

who abut these creeks. Program experts should be invited to explain the benefits of this<br />

program. Additional information about this program can be obtained at the following website:<br />

http://sites.state.pa.us/PA_Exec/PGC/crep/PACREP.htm<br />

Most of the success stories surrounding riparian buffers within Central Pennsylvania have been<br />

the results of dedicated volunteers from conservation and sporting groups. Local anglers have<br />

made it their mission to rehabilitate and save stream habitats for fishing purposes. The<br />

<strong>Township</strong>, too, shares in these dedicated groups. These captive groups should be educated<br />

about the benefits of riparian buffers and energized into action. These “neighbors” can<br />

probably best effect the peer pressure to convince local landowners to get involved. A<br />

“hip-boot-brigade” should be formed from local sportsmen who should regularly travel up the<br />

waterways and meet with adjoining landowners, and describe the benefits and programs of<br />

riparian buffers.<br />

Another powerful ally are the <strong>Township</strong>’s youth. Environmental studies classes can develop pilot<br />

riparian buffers at visible school and park locations; these focused successes enable the<br />

benefits of these buffers to be experienced first-hand by the general public. The School District<br />

should develop and regularly offer a streamside riparian buffer workshop as part of its<br />

curriculum, for students to learn “first-hand” about how man can co-exist with nature.<br />

An obvious location for such a project would be along the creek that crosses the VFW<br />

Picnic Grounds that abut the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Townshoip Elementary School. Local and<br />

School District officials should cooperate on a number of these pilot projects at visible<br />

locations within the <strong>Township</strong>. Then, as succeses mount, they should be featured in<br />

local newsletter and media articles that widen awareness and attention about their use<br />

and benefits. Such projects represent excellent candidates for Growing Greener grants from<br />

the State. Once momentum is achieved, other civic groups are likely to get involved.<br />

Swatara Creek Public Boat Access - Last the Swatara Creek has been identified by<br />

the PA DCNR as a water trail. The Swatara Creek Watershed Association has teamed up with<br />

the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) and DCNR to develop more than 14.6<br />

miles of water trails miles from Jonestown to Union Canal Canoe Rental, in Lebanon County.<br />

throughout Pennsylvania. Water trails are a recreation venue patterned after their land-based<br />

cousins--hiking and biking routes. Under the water trail initiative, PFBC and DCNR work with<br />

conservation partners to provide specific information about designated water trails, including<br />

directions to trailheads and take-out points and information about natural, scenic, historic,<br />

geologic and other points of interest along the way. As such <strong>Township</strong> officials hope to<br />

secure a site along the creek to provide for public boat access along with related<br />

amenities (e.g. parking, signs, picnic tables and trash receptacles). The Parks Map<br />

depicts a “floating symbol” that should be interpreted not to select a particular site as to<br />

identify the general need for such a facility along the creek in the southeast corner of the<br />

<strong>Township</strong>. As opportunities occur the <strong>Township</strong> will negotiate for this site and its<br />

improvements.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 39 - Chapter V – Park Analysis & Recommendations


VI. Mandatory Dedication<br />

Mandatory dedication of parkland has become a standard technique for local park systems to<br />

keep pace with growth since it was enabled by the Pennsylvania Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code<br />

in the late 1980s. However, <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> has yet to employ this technique for<br />

parkland acquisition and improvement. This section will perform the necessary calculations to<br />

support mandatory dedication or fees-in-lieu-thereof within the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />

The NRPA’s recommended minimum standards for local parklands is listed below:<br />

NRPA Local Park Acreage Standards<br />

Park Type<br />

Community Park<br />

Neighborhood Park<br />

Total<br />

Minimum Acres Needed per 1,000 Population<br />

5 to 8 acres<br />

1 –2 acres<br />

6 -10 acres<br />

To date, the <strong>Township</strong> and School District has provided local parklands at a rate of about 13.5<br />

acres per 1000 population exceeding the NRPA standards listed above; however, much of this has<br />

been derived from other sources. For this reason, this <strong>Plan</strong> will only calculate needed parklands on<br />

the higher of the NRPA standards – namely 10 acres per 1,000 people. To derive a per unit or per<br />

lot standard, the 1,000 population is divided by the average household size (year 2000) reported as<br />

follows:<br />

2000 Average<br />

Household Size<br />

Mandatory Parkland Dedication Calculations (for raw land)<br />

No. of Dwellings<br />

per 1,000 Population<br />

Required Park Acres<br />

per Dwelling Unit<br />

2.60 385 .026 acres<br />

If raw land was all that was needed to provide for local parks, then the preceding required park<br />

acres per dwelling unit would enable the <strong>Township</strong> to collect parkland that would keep pace with its<br />

projected growth. But a community and/or neighborhood park is more than raw land; it requires a<br />

high level of infrastructure and improvement. Generally, the value of these improvements equals<br />

the value of the parkland itself. Therefore, it is recommended that the <strong>Township</strong> double the<br />

preceding acreage figures to .052 acres per dwelling unit to derive needed mandatory<br />

dedication standards that will effectively meet expected demand for developed parks.<br />

As an alternative to parkland dedication, municipalities can accept a fee-in-lieu of parkland dedication.<br />

This approach can only be used in those instances where the developer and municipality<br />

agree on the amount of the fee-in-lieu. In addition, such funds cannot be used merely to maintain<br />

existing facilities, but must be used to:<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 40 - Chapter VI – Mandatory Dedication


1. purchase new parkland;<br />

2. purchase new equipment for new or existing parks; and/or,<br />

3. make improvements to existing parks that will serve existing residents and those of the<br />

proposed development.<br />

According to requirements within the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code, amounts of the fees-in-lieu<br />

should be derived from the following approach:<br />

An appraiser should be retained by the municipality to analyze recent real estate transactions<br />

and derive estimates of fair market value. Such estimates can be based upon all properties<br />

within the municipality, or on a neighborhood basis. It is important that the appraiser be informed<br />

of the development features (e.g., utilities, zoning, curbs, sidewalks, etc.) common to<br />

such lands, so that accurate real estate comparisons can be identified. Once these estimates<br />

are derived, they should be periodically updated to reflect the ever-changing value of land.<br />

When disputes between the developer and municipality occur, both the developer and<br />

municipality should select an appraiser who, in turn, should jointly select a third appraiser. This<br />

third appraiser should then determine the fair market value of the land.<br />

Funds collected under this approach must be used to provide for recreation facilities that are<br />

accessible to residents of the proposed development. In determining accessibility to the park, local<br />

officials should be guided by the respective park service areas. Monies collected for community<br />

parks (about $1664/unit) need to be spent somewhere within the <strong>Township</strong>, and because the<br />

<strong>Township</strong> already has provided for its projected community park needs through the year 2020 such<br />

funds need not be spent on community park improvements. Instead such monies can be spent on<br />

nearby neighborhood parks or the proposed Village Link Trail. On the other hand, monies collected<br />

for neighborhood parks (about $416/unit) from proposed new units within the “urban<br />

neighborhoods,” as identified on the map contained on page 26 of this <strong>Plan</strong>, should be spent within<br />

the respective neighborhood. Monies collected for neighborhood parks from proposed new units<br />

outside of the “urban neighborhoods” should be spent within that “urban neighborhood” that is<br />

closest to the respective unit as possible.<br />

Fees-in-lieu collected that are not immediately spent need to be deposited within an interest<br />

bearing account clearly identifying the specific recreation facilities for which the fee was received.<br />

Funds collected that are not spent within three years of deposit shall be refunded to the payee<br />

upon request. Additional applicable regulations are contained within Section 503.(11) of the<br />

Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code.<br />

To estimate the value of fees-in-lieu of parkland dedication an average value of $40,000 per acre<br />

will be used to account for the value of improved residentially-zoned land within the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />

This figure is based upon recent real estate transactions researched by <strong>Township</strong> staff during the<br />

summer of 2002. Therefore, the estimated value for fees-in-lieu of parkland dedication within the<br />

<strong>Township</strong> should be about $2080 per dwelling unit.<br />

.052 acres / unit X $40,000 / acre = $2080 / unit<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 41 - Chapter VI – Mandatory Dedication


By applying these above figures to the <strong>Township</strong>’s projected growth, as described in Chapter III,<br />

the following dedicated acres and/or fees-in-lieu can be collected to meet increasing park demand<br />

generated by growth:<br />

Time Period<br />

Projected Dedicated Parklands or Fees-In-Lieu-Thereof 2000 to 2020<br />

Projected New<br />

Dwellings<br />

Projected Dedicated<br />

Parklands<br />

Projected Fees-In-Lieu of<br />

Parkland Dedication<br />

2000-2010 387 20.1 acres $804,960<br />

2000-2020 774 40.2 acres $1,609,920<br />

As can be seen, the value of mandatory dedication/fee-in-lieu-thereof standards is about 1.6<br />

million dollars over the next 20 years; therefore, the <strong>Township</strong> should waste little time in<br />

adopting and applying such provisions within its subdivision and land development<br />

ordinance.<br />

With adoption of this plan comes the ability of the <strong>Township</strong> to collect mandatory dedicated<br />

parklands or fees-in-lieu thereof. This is the best, and most widely-used method of park system<br />

acquisition and development that basically enables municipalities to keep pace with growth.<br />

However, the use of this technique requires expertise on the specific applicable provisions of<br />

the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code that enable it. In addition, since this technique is applied<br />

during the subdivision and land development process, it forces those involved in the delivery of<br />

parks and recreation to become part of that review process. Finally, specific provisions of the<br />

<strong>Township</strong> zoning ordinance provide incentives for the creation and protection of parklands and<br />

open spaces.<br />

All of these “details” will likely strain local staff and officials’ knowledge and resulting<br />

initial use of the mandatory dedication approach. Therefore it is recommended that the<br />

<strong>Township</strong> sponsor a workshop for those involved in the process to educate all about<br />

how to apply this new approach.<br />

This workshop should focus upon:<br />

1. the duties of each person/agency in the review procedures of proposed<br />

developments with dedicated parklands or fees-in-lieu thereof;<br />

2. the specific deadlines imposed upon the development review process;<br />

3. the actual language contained within Sections 402.5.5. and 623 of the <strong>East</strong><br />

<strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance;<br />

4. the language of Section 503.(11) of the Municipalities <strong>Plan</strong>ning Code; and,<br />

5. those various provisions of the <strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> Zoning Ordinance that<br />

provide incentives and design flexibility for the creation and protection of<br />

parklands and open spaces.<br />

This workshop could be presented by the <strong>Township</strong>’s planning consultants, the<br />

<strong>Township</strong>’s Solicitor, the <strong>Township</strong>’s engineer, local officials from adjoining<br />

municipalities who have experience with the process and/or staff from the State.<br />

Even after the conduct of this workshop, the review and approval of a development<br />

proposal can be difficult and require skillful negotiation. Therefore, it is recommended<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 42 - Chapter VI – Mandatory Dedication


that the <strong>Township</strong> hire expert development plan review assistance from planning and<br />

engineering experts during the first few proposals that run through the process. These<br />

experts should assist in staff reviews of such proposals and attend the various Board<br />

and Commission hearings where the actual formal reviews occur. Then once local staff<br />

and officials become comfortable with their duties and roles, these “experts” can be<br />

used on an as-needed-basis, upon request from the <strong>Township</strong>.<br />

It is also important to note the <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning Commission will now begin to play a<br />

role in the acquisition and development of parks since they are integral to the<br />

subdivision and land development review process. They too, should participate in the<br />

workshop.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 43 - Chapter VI – Mandatory Dedication


VII. Capital Budget<br />

The following lists those parks and improvements recommended by this <strong>Plan</strong> that are eligible<br />

expenses covered by parklands or revenues generated from mandatory dedication or fees-in-lieuthereof:<br />

Service Area<br />

New Parks<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ned<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ned Parks and Improvements<br />

Value of<br />

New Parks<br />

<strong>Township</strong>-wide NA $0<br />

Community Parks<br />

Neighborhood Parks<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ned Improvements<br />

Electrification, lighting and<br />

public address system<br />

Value of<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ned<br />

Improvements<br />

$150,000<br />

Shellsville NA $0 NA $0<br />

Northern Link 6 acres $240,000<br />

Athletic field, playground, picnic pavilion,<br />

parking, basketball, volleyball, related site $255,528<br />

features.<br />

Southern Link<br />

1 acre<br />

$0, required by Playground, picnic pavilion, basketball,<br />

developer<br />

volleyball, related site features.<br />

$110,520<br />

Athletic field, playground, picnic pavilion,<br />

Grantville 4.1 acres $164,000 parking, basketball, volleyball, related site $255,528<br />

features.<br />

Chesapeake MHP 1.9 acres $76,000<br />

Playground, picnic pavilion, basketball,<br />

volleyball, related site features.<br />

$110,520<br />

Shellsville, Northern Link,<br />

& Grantville<br />

neighborhoods<br />

4.2 miles<br />

10.2 acres<br />

Total Value of <strong>Plan</strong>ned Parks $480,000<br />

Linear Parks<br />

To be determined To be determined To be determined<br />

Total Value of <strong>Plan</strong>ned<br />

Improvements<br />

$882,096<br />

Total Value of Recommended Parks and Improvements - $1,362,096<br />

A comparison of the projected revenues via mandatory dedication over the next 20 years and the<br />

costs of planned new parks and improvements is provided below:<br />

Projected Revenues Projected Costs Balance<br />

$1,609,920 $1,362,096 + $247,824<br />

The excess revenues can be used to design, acquire and construct the planned Village Link Trail<br />

following the completion of a trail feasibility study that will determine its alignment, mode of<br />

ownership, needed surfaces and other related amenities (e.g., road crossings, signs, bridges,<br />

retaining walls, etc.).<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 44 - Chapter VII – Capital Budget


In addition to the above new parks and park improvements, this <strong>Plan</strong> has identified various<br />

needed repairs to existing parks as tabulated below:<br />

Recommended Repairs to Existing Parks<br />

Park<br />

Total Cost of Repairs<br />

EHT Municipal Park $32,600<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> Elementary School $25,000<br />

Total Cost of Needed Repairs $57,600<br />

These expenses are not eligible for funding under the <strong>Township</strong>’s mandatory dedication or feesin-lieu-thereof<br />

requirements of the subdivision and land development ordinance. Therefore the<br />

<strong>Township</strong> and the School District will have to rely upon other more traditional forms of financing<br />

for these maintenance tasks. Previously expended general funds that were used to acquire<br />

and improve parks and are now replaced with the mandatory dedication revenues should<br />

be diverted to finance increased maintenance efforts. In addition, both the <strong>Township</strong> and<br />

the School District should employ creative ways to enlist the help of volunteers who<br />

often are willing to “pitch-in-a-hand” to keep their parks in good condition.<br />

Given the projected growth within the <strong>Township</strong> and the resulting need for additional<br />

scattered neighborhood parks, it is clear that additional maintenance staff will be required.<br />

It is unlikely that volunteer manpower will be able to meet the increasing needs for<br />

maintenance of the expanding park system. The <strong>Township</strong> should evaluate manpower<br />

needs as these new parks come on-line and make necessary manpower adjustments. The<br />

<strong>Township</strong> might also consider negotiating a maintenance agreement with the School<br />

District which likely is better prepared and equipped to maintain parks on a temporary or<br />

permanent basis. Of course the details would determine the feasibility of this approach. In<br />

the end the <strong>Township</strong> must commit the manpower and resources to keep these parks<br />

functional, safe and attractive, whatever approach is selected. Fortunately along with<br />

growth will come additional tax and recreation fee revenues to help offset costs.<br />

With more maintenance staff comes the need for more detailed work tasks and direction. It<br />

is important that the <strong>Township</strong> clearly describe in detail those routine tasks that will be<br />

required to keep the parks in good condition. This should include a duty-roster of tasks to<br />

be completed at regular intervals (eg. daily, weekly, monthly, seasonally, annually, as<br />

needed, etc.) In addition, the maintenance staff needs to know what constitutes “good<br />

condition” for park maintenance. The <strong>Township</strong> should develop specific descriptions of<br />

standards-of-care for each park and its facilities so that all have the same expectations of<br />

what constitutes acceptable maintenance. These duties should be performed by the Park<br />

and <strong>Recreation</strong> Leader with help from an outside consultant, if required. The <strong>Township</strong><br />

might also look to the School District for help in developing the duty-roster and standardsof-care.<br />

<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hanover</strong> <strong>Township</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - 45 - Chapter VII – Capital Budget

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!