08.06.2015 Views

PCM-2 Manual.pdf - Voss Associates

PCM-2 Manual.pdf - Voss Associates

PCM-2 Manual.pdf - Voss Associates

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ackground, would be selected. The total count rate on which to alarm is derived by dividing 10<br />

counts by the length of the count time interval.<br />

The Poisson Distribution Function can be cumbersome to use because the p(x) and P(x) values are not<br />

directly obtained by a single calculation. Rather, chains of calculations or the use of a look up table<br />

are required.<br />

2. High Count Rates and/or Long Counting Intervals<br />

When 20 or more background counts are expected per count cycle, the Gaussian Distribution<br />

Function can be invoked with acceptable results. In terms of count rate, background will be<br />

annotated with the symbol R B , R representing a count rate and B signifying background. The data<br />

must be first standardized, then normalized to the function as follows:<br />

Because the function is "standardized", i.e., centered about zero, so average background is subtracted<br />

from the data so as to reference to zero instead of average background. Thus, the alarm set point is<br />

expressed as a net count rate -- or count rate above background.<br />

Regardless of the level of R B , it is normalized, or scaled to the Gaussian function, by its standard<br />

deviation. Because Table 2 operates on (J (standard deviation) the entire distribution of R B is known<br />

in terms of its (J. An alarm setpoint would then be selected as being an appropriate number of (J<br />

above the average background count rate for a given false alarm rate. An appropriate name for the<br />

constant that would multiply (J is SIGMA FACTOR, abbreviated as "SF."<br />

Eq. 35 illustrates how simply the alarm setpoint is selected where RA(MIN) symbolizes the net count<br />

rate on which to alarm. Note that the alarm set point is expressed as a minimum since lower count<br />

rates would result in higher false alarm probabilities. Higher values are permissible since they would<br />

serve to reduce the false alarm rate. Figure 6 is a graphic interpretation of Eq. 35.<br />

RA(MIN)<br />

'"' ~' - -',!"'" /'<br />

- ~ ! - /T<br />

= SF J --j<br />

'J. '8 '<br />

r-<br />

~ Eq. 35<br />

I<br />

i<br />

\<br />

-+- R<br />

A( ,",,'n)<br />

Figure 6<br />

<strong>PCM</strong>2.MAt\'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!