08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 45—1991 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 45—1991 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 45—1991 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Influence of Thr ee Safeners on the Herbicidal<br />

Effe ct s of Triasulfuron l<br />

Irena L Zbiec 2 and Robert M. Devlin 3<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

I n this study triasulfuron caused severe inhibition of co rn<br />

grow th . Tr i a s u l f u r on at 60 uM caused a 69% reduction in shoot<br />

length and a 60% reduction in shoot dry weigh t . \iith the addi ­<br />

tion of l mM of BAS-145l3 8 t he percent decreases in shoot leng th<br />

and dry weight were 35 and 33%, respectively . Similarly. corn<br />

roots were a lso part ial ly p rotected by BAS-145l38 . Di c h l o r mi d<br />

and R- 29 l 48 also afford ed pa r t i a l protection to corn fr om the<br />

her bicid al a c t iv it y of t r i a s ulf u r on . For example , shoo t le ng th<br />

was re du c e d 32% by 20 uM tri as u l f u r on but onl y 10% when 1 roM<br />

d ich lo r mi d was also add e d . Alt hou gh compl et e p r o t e c t i o n of c o rn<br />

f r om triasul fu ron wa s not given by BAS- 145 13 8 , d ich lor mid , or R­<br />

29148 , the result s o f this study o ffer hope that su c h prot e c t i o n<br />

may be found i n t he near future.<br />

I NTRODUCTI ON<br />

Su lf ony l u r e a her bicide s represent a re latively new , highly<br />

activ e cl a ss of herbicides. The development of safeners to a llow<br />

broader use of these compounds in corn (zee ~ L .) a nd / o r sor ­<br />

ghum (So rghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ] culture would be most useful.<br />

Howeve r . r es e a r c h on safen ers for sulfonylurea herbicides has<br />

been limit ed .<br />

The s a f e ne r NA u . 8-naphthalic anhydride) has been shown to<br />

hav e good safening activ i t y against chlorsulfuron l2-c hloro -~- [ [<br />

(4 -methoxy -6 -methyl -l , 3. 5-triazin -2 -yl) amf no l carbonyl} benzen esul ­<br />

fonamide }in corn {2 .4 ,5 .6} . Good protection by NA an d partial<br />

protection by cyometrinil { ( Z ) - d ( {cyenome t ho xy) imino} ben ­<br />

zeneacetoni trile} to sorghum treated with chlo r sulfur on has been<br />

obse rved (3 ). Devlin and Zbiec (1) have shown that BAS-145 13 8<br />

can par t ially protect corn from the sulfon ylu rea herbicides<br />

chlorim uron {2- [ [ [ [ (4- c h 1o r o - 6- me t hoxy - 2- py r i mi d i ny l) ami nal car ­<br />

bonyl } a mi nal su Lf ony k l be n z o Lc acid } , ch1orsu1f uro n , and su1 ­<br />

f omet u r on [2- ([ [[ (4 , G-d i me t hy 1- 2-p yrimid i ny 1 ) a mi no ] carbony l]<br />

a mino }sulfony l ] benzoic acid}.<br />

1/ Pa per No . 3000 . Mas sa chusetts Agric ul tural Experiment<br />

Sta tion . Unive rsity of Massachusetts at East waxeham , This<br />

r es ea rc h project is support ed from Exper iment Station Proje c t<br />

No. 629.<br />

2/ Visiting scientist. Academy of Agricu lt ure . s acaec Ln , Poland .<br />

3/ Profe s sor , Labo ratory of Experimental Biolog y , Cranberry Ex ­<br />

periment Station . Univ ersity of Hassachusetts. East Wareha m.<br />

MA 02538.


In the p re s ent study t he safening effects of the s afe ne rs<br />

BAS- 145 138 , di ch1orm id , a nd R- 2 914 8 in co r n t re a t e d with triasul ­<br />

fu ro n we re obse rv ed ..<br />

MATERIA LS AND METHODS<br />

Co rn s e e ds were s o ak ed for 6 h in 1 roM solut ions of BAS- l45 ­<br />

l3B, d ichlormi d , or R- 29 14 B.. The s ee d s we r e then so wn i n 9-cm<br />

styrofoam pot s OS s e eds per pot) f ill e d with moist v e r mi c u l i t e<br />

t hat had b e en p r ev iou sl y treated on the suface with 5 ml of 0 ,<br />

20 , 40 . o r 6 0 uM of t r ia s u l fu ro n i n wa t e r . The herbicide solu ­<br />

tion wa s app li e d as a f i ne spr ay usin g a small atomizer at 10<br />

kPa. The se ed s we re co v e r e d with about one ern of untrea ted mo i s t<br />

ve rm i c u l i t e . Pe t r i di s h h alves were u s e d as hol der s for the pots<br />

to cat ch d raina ge an d a s an indi r ect way to provid e wat er and<br />

nutrients.<br />

condi~~~n~l~~t~i ;~~e {i~~w~E i~_~s§!I~Wi~ ~h~~~ ~~~e~ ~o~: ;: f ta nd<br />

temp e r at u re (2 2 laC ) . Afte r sho ot e mergenc e , 3 0 ml of 0 .5<br />

s t r e ng t h Hoagla n d s olu t i o n was a p p l ie d daily to e a c h pot via the<br />

p etri d is h ho l de r s . After 12 days t he se edlings were re moved<br />

from t h e po t s a nd t h e r oots t horou ghl y wa sh ed. The 10 larges t<br />

s e ed l in gs (dete r mine d by sho ot length) fro m each pot were<br />

sele c t e d , and t h eir s hoot length , ro o t le ngth , fresh weig h t , and<br />

d r y weigh t dete rm ined. All experiments were r eplic at ed f o u r<br />

ti mes an d the d ata s ubj ec t ed t o analy si s o f v a ri a n c e .<br />

RESULTS AND DIS CUSSI ON<br />

Growth of c orn was severly i nh i b i t e d by tr iasu l f uron. In<br />

t he BAS-14513B expe r im en ts s ho ot le ngth o f corn trea ted with 20 ,<br />

40, and 60 uM triasulfu ro n was reduced 50, 57 , and 73% , respec ­<br />

ti ve ly (Table 1) .<br />

I n th e d i c h l o rmi d and R-29 14B experiments simil ar inhibition<br />

o f sh oot l e n g t h by t r i a sulf u r o n was observed (Tabl e 2 & 3 ). As<br />

e xpe ct ed , f resh we i g h t a nd dry weight of both roo ts and shoots<br />

wer e al so reduc ed by tr ia s ulfur on (Table 1.2 ,3) .<br />

BAS-14513B e xperi ment .. Shoot length of corn treated with<br />

2 0 , 40 , an d 60 uM triasulfuron wa s reduced 50, 57 , and 73% (Table<br />

1) . In th e pre sence of 1 mM BAS-145 l3 B tr iasulfuron was c onsi<br />

derabl y le ss ef fe ctive , th e a for e - men t i one d r e d uc t io n s rea ding<br />

14, 26 , an d 35 % (Table 1). S i mi l a r s afeni ng a c t i on wa s a lso<br />

no t e d when s hoo t fresh and dry weights were me as ured. Fo r ex ­<br />

amp l e , at 40 uM t ri a sulfur on shoot fres h and dry weights were<br />

do wn 57 an d 34%, re sp ec t iv e l y . With t he ad dition of 1 mM BAS­<br />

14513B, sh oot fres h a nd dry we i g h t s were only inh ib i ted 19 a nd<br />

7 %:, re spe ct ively (Tab le 1). Root gro wt h wa s also p a r t i a l l y<br />

p ro t ec t ed by BAS-1 4 51 3 8 f ro m t he herbici dal acti on of t riasulf<br />

ur o n (Tab le 1) .


Table 1. Safening influence of BAS-145 138 IBASI on herbicidal<br />

effects of Triasulfuron (HERB) on the growth of corn.<br />

SHOOTS i Rc>D""TB'""--- l<br />

HERB BAS ! . Length . Fr Wgt ! Dry Wgt , Length ; Fr Wgt 1Dry ·Wg t<br />

(uM) ImMl ! (mm] (mg/pI) : (mg/PI ) ! (nun) (mg/pl) l (mg/pI) I<br />

- 0---<br />

i<br />

0 181 623 44 176 . 508 1 38 !<br />

20 90 337 32 88 171 21<br />

20 155 531 41 164 406 33<br />

40 78 271 29 67 109 15<br />

40 134 504 41 147 275 26<br />

60 48 172 17 42 109 17<br />

60 117 415 36 128 210 23<br />

LSD 5% 4.0<br />

26 2.9 13.9 I 34 I 3.0 I<br />

1% 5 . 4 36 3.9 18 .9 t 4 6 j 4 . 0 :<br />

' J -1..-..-- '<br />

Dichlormid experiment. Shoot growth in leng th of corn<br />

treated with 20 , 40, and 60 uM triasulfuron was inhibited 32 , 45,<br />

and 70% , respectively. With the addition of 1 roM dichlormid ,<br />

these r e duc t i o n s were 10 , 20, and 27%, respectively (Table 2).<br />

Shoot fresh and dry weight reductions caused by triasulfuron were<br />

also offset by dichlormid. For example, 60 uM dichlormid reduced<br />

shoot fresh weight 63% and shoot dry weight 48% (Table 2).<br />

However , with the addition of 1 roM d ichlormid fresh weight was<br />

only reduced 11% and dry weight was similar to the control (Table<br />

2) . Safening action of dichlormid in triasulfuron-treated corn<br />

plants was also apparen t when root length , fresh weight , and d r y<br />

weight were measured (Table 2) .<br />

Table 2 . Safening influence of Dichlormid (DICHL) on herbicidal<br />

effects of Triasulfuron (HERB) on the growth of corn.<br />

SHOOTS<br />

HERB DICHL - -Le ng t h \ Fr Wgt "Dr-y Wgt ,<br />

(uM) (roM) (rom) (mg/pl) (mg/pl)<br />

1 87 587 50<br />

20<br />

20<br />

12 7<br />

168<br />

458<br />

594<br />

47<br />

53<br />

128<br />

189<br />

238<br />

542<br />

27<br />

46<br />

40<br />

40<br />

102<br />

150<br />

382<br />

574<br />

43<br />

55<br />

122<br />

i 178<br />

194<br />

376<br />

23<br />

36<br />

60<br />

60<br />

LSD<br />

I<br />

5%<br />

1%<br />

57<br />

137<br />

8.3<br />

11.0<br />

220<br />

523<br />

44<br />

60<br />

26 ! 71 136 20<br />

53 1 148 260 28<br />

4 . 9 i 18 -1'--5-2- -- --;:-; ---<br />

~~__J_~_~.~ ~_ . __~ _ ~_._ 7


R-2914 8 e xperim ent. Shoot length of corn t r e a t e d with 20 .<br />

4 0. and 60 uM tr iasulfuron wa s inhibited 35. 48. and 6 5%,<br />

respectively. Whe n al so trea ted wit h 1 roM R-29148. i nh i b i t i o n s<br />

of shoot l ength we r e 1 5, 21, and 28%, respecti vely (Table 3).<br />

Strong _safening ac tion was observed when shoot fresh a nd dr y<br />

weigh ts were measured . Corn plant s t r e a t e d with 20 , 40 , and 60<br />

uM triasulfuron had shoot fresh weight inhibited 29 , 44, and 6 5%<br />

and shoot dry weight inhibited 17, 27 , and 56%. resp e ct ive ly<br />

(Table 3) . However, with the add ition of 1 roM R-2 9 148 f r e s h<br />

weigh t reductions we r e 5 , 9. a nd 19% an d d r y we ight red u c t i o n s<br />

were 0 , 0, and 5%, respective l y (Tab l e 3 ) . Roo t gr owt h i n<br />

tria su l fu r on- t r e at e d cor n p la n t s was als o pr o t e c te d by R-29148<br />

(Table 3) .<br />

Tab le 3. Safe n in g inf luence of R-29148 (R-29) 00 he r b icidal<br />

e ffe cts o f Tr i as u l f u r oo (HER B) on th e growth of corn .<br />

,- - - -----r - - -- S - H - 0- 0 T'~S---...,.-----.:-~~;;-;,,-- ·<br />

~ER B R-29 . Le ngt h ; Fr Wg t ' Dr y Wg t<br />

( uM) ( mM) (mm) (mg /p1) (mg /p1)<br />

I Le n g t h ,RF~ ~g~ Si Dry Wgt l<br />

I (rom) : (mg/pI) (mg /pI) I<br />

'- -- ---- ------- - -- ,- -- - -- - ----- '<br />

144 5 18 41 13 6 56 0 42<br />

20 9 3 367 34 124 244 2 5<br />

20 12 2 490 42 146 406 35<br />

, 40 75 288 30 104 17 3 2 1<br />

40 114 473 44 14 6 3 10 32<br />

60 50 179 18 134 17<br />

60 104 421 39 282 28<br />

LSD<br />

I<br />

5% 7 .6 24 i 3 . 0 34 1.7<br />

1% 10 .4 32 I 4.1 46 2.4<br />

It i s apparent f rom t his st udy t h a t BAS-1 4 5138, di c hl o rm i d,<br />

and R- 29 148 can at least par t i a l ly p rote c t corn p l a n t s f r om t h e<br />

herb i c ida l ac tivit y of t riasu lf uron. Co r n s e e d tr eatment s wi t h<br />

anyo ne of the above safeners wo u l d al low t h e use o f tr i asulf uro n<br />

for weed contro l in co rn cultu re .<br />

LITERA TURE CITED<br />

1. Devl in, R .t-L and 1.1. Zbiec . 1990 . Effect of BAS- 14 5 138<br />

a s an a ntidote for sulfony lurea herb ic id es . <strong>Weed</strong> Tech .<br />

4 , 337 -340 .<br />

2 . Hat zio s , K.K . 1984 . I n t era c t i on s between se lect ed h e r b i c i d es<br />

an d p r ot e c tant s on corn (~ ~l. We ed Sc L 32 : 51- 58 .


3. Hatz ios , K.K . 19 84. Po t e n t ia l saf e n er s f o r protectin g sor ­<br />

gh um {So rg hum b icolo r (L.) Mo en c h ] a gai ns t ch Lor-au Lf ur-on ,<br />

fluazif op-bu tyl an d s e t .hox yd i.rn, <strong>Weed</strong> Re s . 2 4 :249-2 54.<br />

4. O'Leary , N.F . and G .N . Prendeville . 1985 . Up t ak e an d phy t o­<br />

toxic i ty of chlorsulfuron in Zea ~ L. in the presence o f<br />

1, 8- n a p ht h alic anhydride. <strong>Weed</strong> Re s . 25 :331-3 39.<br />

5. Parker , C., W.G. Ri chardson, a nd T ..M. We s t. 1980 . Pot en tia l<br />

for ext e n din g th e se l e ct i v i ty of DPX-4 1 89 by u s e of herbicide<br />

s a f e n e r s . p r o c , Br . Cr op Pr ot. Co n f , Wee d s 1 : 1 5 -21 .<br />

6 . Swee t s e r , P .B. 1985. Sa f e ni ng o f sulf ony lurea herbici d es to<br />

ce r e a l c rops : Mod e o f h e r b ic id e a n t i d o te a c ti on. Pr o e. Br ,<br />

Cr op . Pro t. Conf . We e d s 3 :1147-11 54.


The Effect of Chlo r im uron - ethy l on Cranb err y Fru it Qua l ityl<br />

Robe r t M. Devl in 2<br />

Ir e na I Zbi e c 3<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The effect of chlori muron-ethyl on the qua li ty a nd<br />

devel opmen t of t he cranb erry (Vaccinium macroca rpon cv "Ea r l y<br />

Black ") fr uit was stud i e d . The influ ence o f the herbicide on<br />

berr y vol ume , acidi t y , so l ub l e s o li d s, a nt hocyan in c o n t e n t , a nd<br />

f la v onol c ont e n t was det e rm i ne d. bo th f o r t he year of treat ment<br />

an d fo r th e year a ft er t r e at ment . Pree me r g e nc e ap p l icatio n o f<br />

chlor i muron-e t hy l a t 1.12 , 2 . 24 , 3. 36, a nd 4 .4 8 kg / ha did not<br />

affect t he qual it y an d develo pme n t o f t he c ranberry fr uit . Berr<br />

i e s a na l y ze d t he y ear a f t e r applic ation sh owed in c r e a s e s in<br />

individu al berry v o l ume a nd dec r e as e s i n a c idity due to<br />

chlor i muron -et hy l a pp l ic ati o ns . Al so inc reases in yield we r e<br />

ob s e rved t he s e c ond year a ft e r a p plicati on.<br />

I NTRODUCTI ON<br />

The su fonylurea herbic i d e ch lor im u ron -e thy l [e t hy l 2 [ [ [[ (4 ­<br />

chloro- 6-methoxy - 2-p r imideoy l ) ami no] car b onyl] ami no] s ul f onyl] be n­<br />

zoi c a c id} is a ve r y e f f i c ie nt postem e r g ence h e rb i ci d e for the<br />

c o n tro l of a numb er of i mpo r t a n t br oadlea f wee d s i n s o yb e a n<br />

(1, 3 ) . Chlorimu r on -et hyl c a n also b e appl i ed preemer gen ce and is<br />

readily absorbe d b y plant roo ts and is transloc a ted thro ughout<br />

the plant (2 l . Differential metabolism between su s c e p t ibl e and<br />

tolera nt plant s pecie s ge nerally d etermine s selectivity (2 ) . The<br />

he r b i c i d a l acti vity of c h lo r i mu r on - e t hy l i s de t e r mi ned by its<br />

abili ty t o bl oc k th e a c t iv i t y of a ce t o l a c ta t e s yn th ase, an en zyme<br />

wh ich is necess a r y for t h e sy n th es is o f t he e s s e n ti a l ami no aci ds<br />

valine , leu ci n e , and i s o l e u c ine (2). Con s e qu ently, protei n<br />

syn thesis i s e ven t u al ly t e r minat ed a nd t he tr e a t e d p l an t die s.<br />

I n n umerou s fi e l d st ud ies on cr anbe rry bogs we have sho wn<br />

t ha t cra nbe r ry is rela ti vely tol erant o f chlorim uron -ethy l and<br />

that pre emergen c e applica tion o f t he herbic ide c ont r o l s a large<br />

Paper No 29 77 . Massachu s e t t s Agricul t ura l Experim e n t Sta t i on ,<br />

Univer si ty of Massach use t t s a t Eas t Wa r e ham. Th is r e s e a rc h<br />

Pro je c t i s suppo r ted f rom Exp e r i ment Statio n pr oject No . 629 .<br />

Pr o fe s sor , Lab ora t o r y o f Expe r i me nta l Biolo gy , Cranberry Ex ­<br />

periment St a t ion , Un iv e rs i ty o f Mass a c hus e tts, East Ware ham ,<br />

MA 0253 8 .<br />

Visiting sci entist , Academy of Agricu lture , Szczecin , Po l a nd .


number of bog weeds (unpublished datal. We feel that chlorimuron-ethyl<br />

would make an excellent preemergence herbicide for<br />

use on cranberry bogs .<br />

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of<br />

chlorimuron -ethyl on the growth and development of the cranberry<br />

fruit. The effects of the herbicide on cranberry fruit volume ,<br />

acidity . soluble solids, total flavonols, and anthocyanin<br />

development were determined.<br />

METHODS AND MATERIALS<br />

A section of cranberry bog free of weeds and having a<br />

relatively consistent number of uprights over a large area was<br />

~~o:~n a~~~o~~e:~~:~t to ~~~~~i~~2o~~e;~~~, w::c~p~;~~~ ~~p~~~~~~~il<br />

four times and the plots randomized within repl icates. Applica ­<br />

tions were made with a hand held knapsacks sprayer as a fine mist<br />

at the rate of 750 l/ha. At harvest berries were hand scooped<br />

and berry volume determined. A sub -sample was taken from each<br />

plot and frozen for chemical analysis at a later date.<br />

After 30 days the frozen berries were removed from the<br />

freezer and their acidity, soluble solids, an thocyanin c o n t e n t ,<br />

and total flavonols determined. Standard methods for determi ning<br />

acidity and soluble solids were employed. Anthocyanins were<br />

determined according to the methods of Deubert (4) and flavonols<br />

according to the methods of Lee and Francis (5).<br />

To determine if chlorimuron-ethyl had any residual effect<br />

cranberries were again harvested from the above mentioned plots<br />

the following year and their growth and development analyzed as<br />

before . All data were subject to analysis of variance.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Preemergence application of chlorimuron-ethyl a t 1.12, 2 .24 ,<br />

3.36. and 4 .48 kg/ha did not affect the quality and development<br />

of the cranberry fruit. No significant differences could be<br />

found in cranberry volume , acidity, soluble solids . and t o t a l<br />

flavo nols (Table 1).<br />

One of the most important parameters me a s u red i n this study<br />

was the effect of chlorimu ron-ethyl on anthocyan in development by<br />

the cranberry. As the cranberry ripens, relatively large<br />

amounts of anthocyanin pigments are synthesized , imparting to the<br />

mature fruit an attractive red color. As might be expected , a<br />

direct relationship exists between color development in the<br />

cranberry and its commercial value. Thus growers must guard<br />

against herbicides that might retard color development. In this<br />

study no significant differences in anthocyanin content were<br />

found when control berries and berries treated with chlorimuron-


ethyl were compar ed (Tab l e 1 ) .<br />

Table 1 . The effec t of c hl o r i mur on- e th y l (Herb ) on c ranber r y<br />

fruit quality. Acidity is in ml o f 0.1 !! NaOH/lD Dg of berries .<br />

,----- --r- - ------ -- ------ -- - _._- ----_ ._--- ---<br />

Herb Vo l Acidity Sol . Solids Anthocyanin Total Fl av o nol s<br />

{kg/hal Imll Imll 1%1 Img/1 0 0gl {mg/ 10 0g 1<br />

0 1. 3 9 255 4.9 31 20<br />

1.1 2 1.39 2 56 4.9 32 1 9<br />

2.24 1. 3 8 255 4 .9 32 21<br />

3.36 1.38 256 5 .0 2 9 19<br />

4 .48 1. 4 0 257 5.1 28 1 8<br />

----------<br />

SO 5% 0 .13 7 .5 0 .21 4.4 2 .0<br />

'--<br />

1% 0 .18<br />

_ .1-<br />

10.4 0 .29 6. 0 2 . 7<br />

_<br />

A percent drop in yield was o bserved wi th incr easin g rat es<br />

of c hlori muron - eth yl app lied . However , the drop in yie ld was not<br />

s i gn i f i c a n t , on ly sugg e stive of a possible herbicidal e ffec t<br />

(Tab l e 2) . Whe n th e sam e plots were harvested t he fol lo wing<br />

growin g season a significant i nc r e a s e in yie ld was obser ved in<br />

plots pre vious ly t r e a t e d wi th 2.24 , 3.36, and 4 .48 kg/ ha<br />

chlorimuron-ethyl (Tab l e 2). Most l ik el y this was due to be tter<br />

weed c o ntrol where the her bi c ide had been appl i e d.<br />

Tab le 2 . Effect of chlor imuron -e thyl (Her b) on cranb er ry y i el d<br />

in the y ear of app li catio n (lst yr ) and in th e ye ar af t e r appl i­<br />

cation (2nd yr ) ;<br />

Herb Yi e ld 1%1<br />

{kg/ha l 1 st yr 2nd y r<br />

------0- --- -<br />

100<br />

- J:1jQ<br />

1. 1 2 96 11 8<br />

2.2 4 83 134<br />

3.36 79 13 5<br />

4.48 81 134<br />

LSD 5%<br />

-<br />

2 1 31<br />

1% 30 43<br />

In add ition t o differences i n yield , di fferences in v o l ume<br />

and ac i di ty were a l s o obser ved the s e c o nd year. Plo ts prev iousl y<br />

t reat ed wi th 2 .24 , 3 .36, and 4 .48 kg/ha chlori muron -ethyl had<br />

berry volu me i nc r eases of 9 , 12 , and 9%, r e s pe c t i v e l y (Ta b l e 3).


At t hes e s ame r a t e s cranbe rry a c i dity was p ro gre ssively<br />

decre ased (Table 3 ) . I n c o ntr ast, no sign ifi can t dif f er enc es<br />

we r e found the seco nd yea r in th e so l uble s ol i ds , antho cyanin<br />

content , a nd fl avon ol cont en t o f t he c ran be rr ie s (Table 3) .<br />

Table 3. The effe c t o f chl orimu ron -e th yl (Her b ) on c ra nber r y<br />

fruit qual ity t he sec ond y ear a f t e r t r e at ment. Ac id it y i s i n ml<br />

o f O.1~ NaOH/100g o f b e r r i e s .<br />

Herb Vo l Ac id i t y So l.So l id s Antho cyanin Total Flavonols<br />

(kg /hal (mil (mil (%) (mg llO Og) (mg/ l00gl<br />

0 1. 27 32 6 6 . 1 2 8 23<br />

1.12 1.29 3 23 5 . 9 28 24<br />

2 .2 4 1.39 2 91 6 .2 2 6 23<br />

3 .36 1. 4 2 2 88 6 .3 26 22<br />

4.4 8 1.38 275 6 . 2 26 22<br />

LSD 5 % 0. 0 9 1 8 0 . 3 4.0 1. 5<br />

1% 0.12 2 5 0 . 4 5 .6 2 . 1<br />

1_ _ --' _<br />

_.--- - - - -<br />

The da ta in t h i s study suggest th at ch lo r i muro n-et hy l ,<br />

be c ause of it s broad spectrum of we ed co n tro l a nd bec au s e the<br />

cra nberr y i s r elat i vely t ol erant of the herbi ci de , woul d be v er y<br />

us e fu l f or th e control of weeds o n cranberry bogs .<br />

LITERATURE<br />

CIT ED<br />

1. All e n, D.R . a nd P .A. Banks, 1984 . Eva luat i on of DPX- F6 0 2 5<br />

f o r broa dleaf contro l i n soyb ea ns . Pr o c. South. We e d Sci.<br />

So c . 37: 7 3 .<br />

2 . Beyer , E.M . Jr . , M.J . Duffy, J.V. Hay , and D.O . Sch lueter.<br />

19 8 8 . Sul f on ylureas . In P.C. Kearney an d D.D . Kauf man , eds.<br />

He rb i c i de s : C h e m i s t rY~D e g r a d a t i o n , and Mo de of Action , <strong>Vol</strong> .<br />

3 , pp . 1 17 -18 9. Marce l De kke r, I nc . , New York .<br />

3. Claus , J .S . 1987 . Chlorim uron - ethy1 (Cla s si s) : A new<br />

broadle af poa t emer qe nc e her b i ci de in So yb ean. <strong>Weed</strong> Tech.<br />

1: 114-11 5.<br />

4 . Deubert , K.H. 19 78 . A ra pi d me t ho d f o r the ext r ac tio n a nd<br />

qua n t i t a t.Lo n of total ant ho c yanin of cranb e r ry fr u i t . J . Ag .<br />

& Food Chern . 26 (6) : 14 52 - 14 5 3 .<br />

5 . Le e s, D. H. a nd F.J . Francis . 197 1 . Quant itat iv e method s for<br />

anthocyanins. 6 . Flavono ls and a n t ho cya n i ns in cra nberries .<br />

J. Food Sci . 36: 1 056 - 106 0 .


10<br />

~ JdlJlSgmass a:.ntrol in Field Qn;n<br />

E. Prostko, J. Meade, and D. Lee l<br />

Orr-farm fi el d tria ls were con:il.rted in 1989-90 to evalua te the<br />

perf ormance of DPX- V9360 and ffiA-136872 on johnsor


11<br />

Tabl e L '!he Effect of DPX-V9360 Q1 Jol'lnsorqrass COntrol in Fi eld Com,<br />

sal em COUnty New Jersey 198 9<br />

Ililt!><br />

;~~1<br />

Hert?icioi oz AlIA<br />

.DPX-V9360 0 .50 97 78<br />

OPX-V9360 0 . 75 97 78<br />

DPX-V9360 1.00 97 78<br />

lSI) (0.05)<br />

1 Scale 0- 10ot; 0 = ttl oontro l; loo t = carp lete control<br />

2 All treatments i..rcludai X-77 @ o.sa v/V<br />

3 WAT ::; weeks after treatment<br />

11<br />

Table 2 . 'Ihe Effect of DPX-V9 360 arrl aiA -lJ6872 on Johnsongrass control<br />

in Fi el d Chm salem county New Jersey 1990<br />

HerbicW<br />

Ililt!><br />

oz AI /A<br />

~~'W:f<br />

DPX-V9360 0.25 65 100<br />

0.25 4<br />

DPX-V9360 0.50 79 98<br />

QPX-V9360 0 .50 83 100<br />

0 .50 4<br />

OPX-V9360 1.00 85 100<br />

a;A.-136872 0.29 63 90<br />

0.29 4<br />

mA - 136 872 0. 43 78 97<br />

0 .1 4 4<br />


12<br />

WEED CONTROL I N WHEAT WITH TRIASULFURO N<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Winte r an nual weeds contin ue t o be a prob lem for produ c ers<br />

atte mpting t o ma ximi z e bo t h yie l d a nd q u a li t y of winter wh e a t<br />

(Triti c um a e st i yium L. ) . <strong>Weed</strong> s su ch as co rnmon c h i c kwe e d [~<br />

la ria media (L.) vi 11. ) a nd hen bi t (Lamium a mp lex i c a u le L. ) c a n<br />

compe te with the crop and ca use yield r e du ct i o n s whil e wi ld<br />

ga r li c ( Al liu m v i n e a l e L. ) reduces quali ty , t hu s re sult i ng in<br />

lower pr ice s to the produce r. Re search was conduc t ed duri ng t he<br />

ye a r s 198 8 through 1990 to e valuate l ow ra tes (5 -20 g /ha) o f<br />

t riasulfuron applie d in the spri ng for co nt ro l o f th e se weeds<br />

and als o to e va l uate th e po tent i a l fo r carry ove r t o r otati onal<br />

cr op s s uch as soy beans [Gly ci ne max ( L.)Me r r . ] a nd a lf alf a<br />

(~ sati va L.) . Repl i c ated fie ld tr i al s wer e lo c a te d in<br />

Delaw are , Mary land, Mic higan , penns yl vania , and Vi rgin i a. Most<br />

trial s were in whea t while s e v e r a l were conduc ted on heav y<br />

i n f e s ta t i o n s of wild g ar lic g r owi ng in a non -c ro p s i t ua tion .<br />

Wild garl ic c ont r o l from tria sulfuron a t 5 g /h a was 90 - 100 '0 at<br />

mos t l o cat i ons where a wh e a t c rop was prese nt . In no n - cro p<br />

si t ua tio ns, 10 -20 g/ ha were req uire d t o ob tai n ac ce ptab le c o n­<br />

t rol. Cont r o l o f c ommon c h i c kwe e d was ve ry good t o ex ce l l e nt a t<br />

mo s t loca ti ons at rates of 5-1 0 g/ha . Henbit co ntr o l va r i ed from<br />

poo r t o ve r y good depending on l ocati on . Respon se of ro ta tio na l<br />

s oybeans to triasulfuron was v a r i a b l e with no injur y at numer ou s<br />

l o c a t i on s al t h ough soybeans were injured Vi r g i n i a a nd Dela ware .<br />

Al falfa p l a nte d in mi d - to l ate - s ummer was no t affec t e d b y<br />

pre v i ous a ppl ica tio n s o f tr iasu lfuron .<br />

1M. G. Sc h n a p p i n g e r , Senio r Scien tist, Agric . Di v., Ci b a -Gei gy<br />

co r p., centr e vill e , MD 2 16 1 7 , H.P . Wil son, Profe sso r, Ea s t ern<br />

Shor e Ag r ic . Exp . s t n . , Va . Pol y te ch . In s t . a n d Sta te Univ .,<br />

Painter , VA 23 4 2 0, F .J . Webb, Ex te n s i o n Sp e c i a l i s t , We e d<br />

<strong>Science</strong>, Uni v. o f De lawa re Re s . and Educ. cn t r . , Geo rge town, DE<br />

19 947 , J .D . Abbot t , Field Re sea rc h Rep . , Agr ic. n t v • , Cib a ­<br />

Ge i gy Corp ., La n c a st er , PA 17 6 01, and J . R . Can twe l l , Fi eld<br />

Resear ch Rep. , Agric . Di v . , Ciba - Ge i gy Corp ., Camden , MI. 49232


13<br />

GLYPHOS A1E AND lRICLOP YR APPLIED AS A DIRECIE D SPRA Y OR OVER ·TIlE·TOP<br />

OF CO NIFER S IN TIlE FALL<br />

Larry J. Kuhns l/<br />

ABSTRACf<br />

Glyp hosate and tticlopyr are labelled for use as directed sprays in Chris tmas tree plantings.<br />

Though growe rs are cautioned agains t contacting the foliage of the trees with the spray , it is almost<br />

impos sible to make a thorough band application without conta cting some foliage. Man y growers<br />

have found through experience that COntactingthe lower one-third of Christmas trees after their<br />

leaves and bud s are fully hardened does not harm them. Other growers have sprayed rig ht over the<br />

top of their trees with glyphosate. Some reported injuring their trees and some repo rt they did not.<br />

This stud y was designed to evalua te some of the factors which could affect whether or not an<br />

herbicide applica tion that contacts the foliage of the conifers will cause injury: herbicide and<br />

formul ation, rate of application, species treated, and the amo unt of foliage contact ed.<br />

The experime nt was conducted at the fanns of three cooperati ng grower s and the Penn<br />

State Horticulture Researc h Farm at Rock Springs . The trees at growe rs' farms were esta blished at<br />

least two years and were 30-75 cm tall. The trees at the research farm we re plan ted in the spring<br />

prior to application and varied from 25-40 em tall. At the growers ' farms glyphosate and the amine<br />

and ester form ulations of triclopyr were applied as direc ted sprays to the lower third of the trees or<br />

over the top at 0.3, 0. 8, and 1.6 kg ai/ha. With the excep tion of the amine formul ation , the same<br />

treatment s were app lied at the researc h farm, Several commo nly grow n Christma s tree species,<br />

with varyin g sensitivi ty to glypho sate were included in the stud y. Dou glas fir~<br />

~[(Mirb.)Franco]) was treated at two gro wer sites, while Colorado spruce ~<br />

~[E ngelm .]) , eastern white pin e~ m1?Y.5. L.) , and Scots pine


14<br />

a grower' s site were injured by directed spray and over the top applications of glyphosate at 0.8 or<br />

1.6 kg ailha. Injury symptoms included bud abortion and clustering of new growth rather than the<br />

devel opment of a strong central leader . Glyphosate treated Scots pine at the research fann<br />

appeared to be slightly stunted only by the 1.6 kg ailha rate. Triclopyr treatments did not have any<br />

significant effect on the Scots pine at the reseach farm. At the grower's site some trees with<br />

stunted. clustered growth were scatteredthrough the triclopyr treatments, but they could not be<br />

correlated with any specific treatment, The white pine at the grower's site had some chlorotic.<br />

stunted plants with clustered growth scattered throughout the tes t area.but they could not be<br />

correlated to chemi cal treatment or rate of application. At the research farm the white pine receiving<br />

applications oftriclopyr at 1.6 kg ai/ha over the top or as a direc ted spray, and glypho sate at 1.6 kg<br />

ai/ha over the top. were more yellow and slightly stunted compared to the controls. None of the<br />

Fraser fir at the research farm were injured by any of the treatments.<br />

The extremely dry conditions in late summer, 1987, and all summer, 1988, caused some<br />

stuntingand chlorosis throughout the study areasthat was difficult to distinguish from herbicide<br />

related injury. However, it was evident that the treatments used in this study did not cause severe<br />

injury or plant loss.<br />

Figure 1. Injuryrating of four Christmas tree species planted at the Penn State Horticulture<br />

Research Farm at Rock Springs in April 1987and treated in October, 1987. Injury to<br />

the trees was rated in August, 1988 on a scale of 1-10 with l=no injury and lO=dead.<br />

The herbicides were applied either over the top (0) or directed (0) to hit the lower third<br />

of each side of the trees.<br />

Control<br />

Glyphosate<br />

Triclopyr<br />

LSD (.05)<br />

Injury Rating<br />

Rale Method of Douglas Fraser SCots WhIte<br />

!kuiLb.ill~ IiI IiI lliM ~<br />

1.3 2.3 1.5 2.0<br />

0.3 D 1.0 1.7 1.3 1.3<br />

0 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.0<br />

0.8 D 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.3<br />

0 2.7 2.0 1.7 1.7<br />

1.6 D 1.7 2.7 3.0 2.0<br />

0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.3<br />

0.3 D 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.3<br />

0 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.0<br />

0.8 D 2.0 . 1.3 1.0 1.7<br />

0 1.3 3.0 1.0 1.3<br />

1.6 D 2.0 2.0 1.7 2.7<br />

0 1.7 2.3 1.7 3.3<br />

2.0 1.5 1.1 1.8


15<br />

CONTROLLING BLACK LOCUST , BOXELDER, AND TREE-OF-HEA YEN WIlli BASAL<br />

BARK APPLIED HERBICIDES<br />

Gregory T. Lyman, Larry J. Kuhns, and Arthur E. Gover t/<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Basal bark herbicide applications are used to control many types of brush. Variables that<br />

can affect the degree of control provided by a basal bark application include the brush species.<br />

herbicide selected. rate of application , and the carrier. Th is study was designed to investigate each<br />

of these and had the following objectives: 1. to compare the effectiveness of 5% and 20% Garlon<br />

411(tric1opyr) and 5% and 20% of a combination of Accessv (triclopyr + picloram) ; 2. to<br />

compare the effectiveness of diesel fuel and mineral oil as earners; and 3. to compare me<br />

effectiveness of three herbicides-triclopyr, triclopyr + picloram, and irnazapyr.<br />

TIle herb icide treatme nts used are listed in T able L Th e tree speci es trea ted were black<br />

locust


16<br />

Inj ury<br />

Rating<br />

Number of Stems<br />

Chopper)/<br />

6.25%<br />

Diesel<br />

Fuel<br />

boxelder Tl 1"2 T I 1"2 Tl 1"2 T I 1"2 T l 1"2 Tl 1"2 Tl 1"2<br />

Total<br />

I I I I I<br />

39 39 I 34 34 31 31 33 33<br />

1<br />

3<br />

5<br />

6 5<br />

13 8<br />

11 26<br />

39 39<br />

tree-ofheaven<br />

o<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Total<br />

T I 1"2 Tl 1"2<br />

I I<br />

I<br />

6<br />

3 5<br />

4 8 I 3<br />

~ ~ HI ~1 § ~<br />

Tl 1"2 T I 1"2 Tl 1"2 Tl 1"2<br />

I<br />

3 1<br />

5 4 14<br />

34 38 I 40 40 I 17<br />

I<br />

4 4 3<br />

18 I 28 29<br />

Tl 1"2<br />

6<br />

8<br />

5 1<br />

7 I<br />

12 8<br />

4 32<br />

42 42<br />

black locust T ! 1"2 Tl 1"2 Tl 1"2 TI 1"2 Tl 1"2 Tl 1"2 Tl 1"2<br />

I I I<br />

o<br />

I<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5 16<br />

19 19 I 9 9<br />

Total 19<br />

20 20 II I I<br />

9<br />

11Garlon 4 is an emu lsifiable conce ntrate containing the acid equivalent of 480 gil triclop yr,<br />

DowEJanco, Indianapolis, IN<br />

2JAccess is an emulsifiable concentrate containing the acid equivalents of 120 gil picloram and 240<br />

gil rriclcpy r, DowE lanco. Indianapo lis, IN.<br />

31Chopper is a water soluble concentrate containing the acid equiva lent of 240 gil imaza pyr ,<br />

American Cyanamid Com pan y, Wa yne, NJ.<br />

4/ Rite Way , N.G. Gilbert Corporatio n, Muncie, IN.


17<br />

COMPARINGTIlE CONTROL BY BARK ABSORBEDHERBICIDES APPLIED AT TWO<br />

HEIGHTS<br />

Gregory T. Lyman , Larry J. Kuhns, and Anhur E. Gove rt /<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The basal bark technique of herbicide application has proven to be an effective way to<br />

control brush. By applying the herbicide at a height of 1.2 m rather than at the base of the plant the<br />

treatment could be made quicker and easier. The applicator would not need to beconcerned w ith<br />

clearing vegetation from around the base of the stem, brush could be treated even when the base<br />

was co vered with snow. and the bark tissue s at 1.2 m are thinner than at the base. The objective of<br />

this study was to comp are the brush contro l pro vided by triclopyr applied at a heig ht of 1.2 m with<br />

a conventional basal bark:application.<br />

Garlon 4'11(tric lopyr) at 5 and 20% in diesel fuel was applied to stem s of boxelde r maple<br />

CAm~ L.), tree-of -heaven


18<br />

TABLE 1: The numbe r of stems of boxelder maple, tree of heaven, black locust. and black birch<br />

in each injury ratin g category (0-5). A rating of 0 indicates no treatme nt effect, and a rati ng of 5<br />

indicates no visible living tissue. Treatm ents were applied in late Marc h 1988 to eithe r the base of<br />

the plant or 1.2 m abov e the gro und. All treatments were dilu ted in diesel fue l. Control was rated<br />

on October 9, 1989.<br />

G arto n 41/ Garlon 4 Garlon 4 Gar lon 4<br />

Injury 5% 5% 20% 20%<br />

Rating Treatedat Base Treated at 1.2m Treated at Base Treated at 1.2 m<br />

Number of Stems<br />

bcxelder Abov e Trt. Above Below Above Above Below<br />

I<br />

I<br />

0 22 14<br />

I<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5 39 I 3 1 9 3 1 I 34 20<br />

TOOl! 39 31 31 31 34 34<br />

tree-of-heaven Above Trt. Above Below Above Above Below<br />

I<br />

I<br />

0 I7 20<br />

I<br />

2<br />

3 5<br />

4 8 4<br />

5 II 32 17 38 I 40 20<br />

Total 24 34 34 42 40 40<br />

black birch A bove Trt. Above Below Above Above Below<br />

I<br />

0<br />

I<br />

2 I<br />

3 5 5<br />

4 9 12 4<br />

5 20 16 3421<br />

I 22 25 29<br />

TOOl! 34 34 34 22 29 29<br />

black locust Above Trt. A bove Below Abov e Above Below<br />

I<br />

0 13 15<br />

I 1 I<br />

2 I<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5 15 19 4 19 16<br />

TOOl! 19 19 19 20 16 16<br />

I<br />

I<br />

1/ Garlon 4 isan emulsifiable coeccnuate conta ining the acid equivale nt of 480 gil triclopyr, DowElanco,<br />

Indianapolis, IN.<br />

2JNo sprouting was evident on black birch, while all other species resprouted below the 1.2 m treatment area.


19<br />

JCllNSCll>GRI\SSRFXXJIIERYFR(X.I SllLFONYLUREI\HE>


20<br />

Potential Herbicide Rat e Reduction Utilizing<br />

Mulch Characteristics and ManagementSmuegtes<br />

Robin R. Bellinder, Russell W. Wallace and Luis E. Lanfr anconi'<br />

ABSTRACI'<br />

Sevenmulcheswereevaluated in 1990lor ease a/managementand weedsuppression in tomatoes<br />

~ esculentum ). The mulches were selected f or differing control pot entials and included:<br />

two winter-killed mulch es. oats (~ H1I1J!1!} and annual ryegrass fl.!2lium~.. three spring<br />

chemically-killed mulches. red clover (Trifolium~ , grain rye~~ , and redfescue<br />

rE:n.1.JJ.m rJJ1zLg);one mechanically-killed mulch . hairy vetch (Ykig l!il!Jl.El); and conventional tillage<br />

(bare ground). Glyphosare (1.1 kg aitha) and glyphosate (/ .1 kg) + 2,4-D (0.84 kg) were appJled to<br />

rye and red clover. respectively. Redfescue was treated with glyphosate (2.2 kg) and later with<br />

paraquat at 0.6 kg. Although annual ryegrass was winter-killed, a glyphosate + 2,4-D treatment was<br />

required to control perennial weeds. Following tranpkm ting, postemergence herbicides were applied<br />

as-needed. Within each mulch, the herbicide programs included: a weedy check (Trt. 1) and<br />

metrlbuun + sethaxydim applied at 0.56 + 0.22 (Trt. 2),0 .28 + 0.22 (Ii1. 3), and 0.19 + 0.17 kg<br />

aitha (I n. 4). At the time of transplanting, mulch control was complete in rye, oats, and annual<br />

ryegrass. Redfescue , red clover and hairy vetch continued to grow despite regulation attempts.<br />

Approximately 3 weeks after transplanting, percent mulch cover ratings averaged across herbicide<br />

treatments were highest in rye (dead) and redf escue (living) at 80%. Oats and annual ryegrass were<br />

lowest with less than 2% cover. Prefer ential deer (~vjrginianuy Jjeeding during the winter<br />

decreased oat biomass. Initial herbicide treatments were applied 10 days aft er transplanting (DAT) to<br />

oats, 20 DAT to annual ryegrass, hairy vetch, and red clover, and 34 DATto rye and redf escue.<br />

Initial memb uzin applications contributed to redf escue, red clover and hairy vetch suppression.<br />

Plots requiring cwoapplications included treatmenlS 2, 3, and 4 in annual ryegrass, and treatments 3<br />

and 4 in red clover (48 - 50 DAn , however. only the lowest rare of metribuzin was used. In mid­<br />

July, percent weed cover was 50% or greater in all weedy check pl ots except rye and red f escue<br />

which were 39 and 17%. respectively. Within individual mulches there were no significant<br />

differences in percent weed cover regardless of herbicide rare. In comparing mulch systems across<br />

herbicide treatments, two levels Of weed control were observed: greater than 95% in bare ground, rye<br />

and red fe scue, and 65 - 85% in red clover, hairy vetch, annual ryegrass and oats. <strong>Weed</strong> spectra<br />

varied due to differences in mulch establishment and regulation. For example, dandelion (lgrgJgm<br />

~, wild carrot~ mt:Q1i1)and quaccgras~~ were the predominant<br />

weeds in red clover, oats and annual ryegrass, respectively. When comparing untreated mulches,<br />

yields were significantly decreased in red clover, oats, annual ryegrass and bare ground plots when<br />

compared with rye. When averaged across herbicides, yields were lowest in red clover and redf escue<br />

when compared with rye treatments.<br />

'AssOC. Prof , Research Tech., and Grad. Studetu, Dept. of Fruit and Vegetable <strong>Science</strong>, Cornell<br />

University, Ithaca, NY 14853.


21<br />

CGA-163935 : A Ne w Tu r fq ra s s Growt h Regu lato r .<br />

J. W. Pee k, R. L . Brooks , P. J. po rpigl i a a nd D. B. v i t.o Lo !<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

CGA- 163935 ( e t hy l 4-cyclopro pyl ( h yd ro xy ) me t h y l e n e - 3 , S-di ox o ­<br />

cyc loh ex aneca rboxy lat e) is a p lan t growt h regu l a t o r whi ch decr e ases<br />

th e ra t e o f f o l i a r elo n ga t ion of warm- and coo l-seaso n tur fgrasses.<br />

CGA- 163935 r ed uc e s c e ll e l onga t ion by i nh ib i tin g gib bere l li c a ci d<br />

bi osyn t h e s i s . CGA-163935 ha s p r ov en to be a n e f fective p roduct i n<br />

red uc i ng t he fr e qu e ncy o f mowing an d the a mount of clipp in gs<br />

pro du c e d by the turf . I t can a lso be u s ed t o mi nimi z e t he nee d for<br />

ed gi ng turfgras se s . CGA- 163935 i s very e f f e c t i ve on f a s t - g r owi ng<br />

so u t he r n tu rfg ra ss e s s u c h a s s t. Au gu st ine gra ss ( St en o t aphr um<br />

s ec und a tum IWa l t. 1 Kuntz ) . ba h iag ra s s [Pa s pa Lum no ta tum Fiue gge ),<br />

a nd be r muda g ras s ( Cynodon dactyl on (L .] Pers .) . It is e ff ec tiv e on<br />

coo l s e as on grasses s uc h a s tal l f e s c ue ( Fe s t uc a ar u nd i nace a<br />

Sch reb .) , per en n i a l r ye q r a s s ( Lo l iu m pe ren ne L . ), and Ken t uck y<br />

blueg r a s s ( Poa p ratens is L.) .<br />

CGA-163935 can redu ce mowing s and c lipping s by 40- 50\ fo r f ou r<br />

weeks in highly maintain ed t.u r f q r a s s at rates of 300-400 9 a Ly he .<br />

Higher rates of 600-800 9 e Ly ha can redu ce mowings and c lip p i n gs<br />

for up to eight weeks . CGA-163935 . when applied in a 30 cm ba nd at<br />

the ed ge o f l a wn s, can red uce the extension of turfgrass stol on s<br />

thereb y min imiz ing th e need f o r mechanically e d g i ng the pe rimeters<br />

of a l a wn .<br />

Various f o r mu l a t i ons will b e ava I Le b Le . A 1 l b acti v e<br />

ingredi e nt /gallo n MEC wil l be f o r u se on high ly mai ntained<br />

tu r f qr as s fou nd on golf co u r s e s . sod f arms, an d lawns. A 2 lb<br />

acti ve i n g red ie n t / gall on EC will be f or u s e on l ow ma i nt en a n c e<br />

t u r f q r a s s fo und a lo ng r oa ds id es. parks , a nd c omme r c i al /m un i c i pal<br />

prop e r t y . A more d i l ute f ormu lat i on wil l be us e d by home owne r s t o<br />

dec rea s e- th e ne e d o f e dg i ng along c ur bs . fences , an d f low er bed s.<br />

CGA-16 3935 can be us e d w i th ou t a n ad ju va nt and c a n be ta nk - mi xed<br />

with ot he r commonly u sed tur f pe sti ci de s . App li c a ti on s a r e<br />

rain fa s t wi t hi n one h ou r aft e r application because CGA-1 63935<br />

is f oliarl y absorbed.<br />

lCI BA- GEI GY Corp . , Agric ultural Di vision. P. O. Box 183 00 .<br />

Greensboro , NC 27419 - 8300


22<br />

EFFECf .3fJ?~~li:~.wt1l!~~~IfWo~~QUIN<br />

G. 1. Tuxhorn, D. 1. Shaner, and K. Farny l<br />

ABS1RACf<br />

14e imazaquin and imazethapyrwere used to investigate the effect of<br />

¥H on imidazolinone adsorption to soil, and bioavailability to maize.<br />

a ~d ~?~~vc.s~6iliU;~ci :aI~: S~r~~d~~~:~~ilibtllin ~~ ~~i~~cdid~gi<br />

decreasewithpH as rapidly as expected fromincreasedY" adsorption to soil.<br />

This is attributed to a greaterfcfoportionof the imidazolinone molecules<br />

~b~~r\~d ~~:r ~hned~iiioC~ i~~~~ f~::' at low pH, which is preferentially<br />

1Research Soil Scientist, Associ ate Research Fellow, and Technical<br />

Specialist,American Cyanamid Company, Princeton,NJ


23<br />

UNDERSTAN DING WHO LE PlANT ACTIVI TY OF THE IMIOAZO UN ON ES: RELATIONSHI PS<br />

OF PHYSICQ.C HEMICAL PARAMETE RS TO ROOT ABSOR PTION AN D TRAl\I$ LCCA TION<br />

DL Utt le. D.L Shan er, D.W . Ladnef. 8 . Tecle 1, and A. D. I1nicki 2<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Herbic idal activity of the imidaz olinones is known to be cor rela ted with phy sical and chemical<br />

param eters. Mode ling the com ponent processes of herbici de actio n. that is absorption,<br />

translocation . metabol ism, and intrinsic act ivity at the site of action. may help us to und erstand<br />

differences between compounds at the whole p1art level. Root absorption of 5'-su bstitut ed<br />

pyridine imidaz ollnones in both cor n and sunflower was highly cor related wit h their lipoph ilicities .<br />

ONP-treated plants absorbed little imidaz olinone , indicating that most of the abso rption is due to<br />

ion trapping and not to part itioning to lipids. Mocleling translocation in corn was complicated by<br />

metabolism. However. in sunflower the model for translocation from roots 10 shoots contained<br />

parameters for Iipoph ilicity and electr onic natu re. Therefore, 5'-subs tituted pyridine<br />

imidazolinones which have lipophilic, elect ronegative subs lituents at the e-pcsucn shou ld be<br />

well transported in p1art s.<br />

1Res. Bioi., Assoc . Res . Fetlrm , Group Leader , and Res . Bioi., respective ly, Amer ican Cyanami d<br />

Co., Agricuttural Resear ch Division, Princeton , NJ 08543.<br />

2p rof., Dept . Crop <strong>Science</strong>, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903.


24<br />

ACCENT : DUPONT 'S NEW POST EMERGENCE GRASS HERB IC IDE FOR CORN<br />

Jo hn T . Andaloro 1/ an d Donald D . Ga n s k e 1./<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

ACCENT (fo rmer ly kno wn as DPX-V9360) i s a ne w h erbi cid e fo r<br />

posterne r genc e g rass a nd spe c ifi c broad l eaf we e d c ont r o l in fiel d<br />

co r n fr o m Dup ont Ag r ic ul t ura l Pr o du cts . ACCENT i s a memb er o f th e<br />

sulfonylurea class of chemis try i n hibi ts th e b i o s y nthesi s o f<br />

vali ne a nd isoleucine , whic h are nec essa ry for cell divisi on , by<br />

inh i bi t i ng th e e n zyme ace tol ac t a t e synt hase. Th i s e n zyme s yst em i s<br />

s pec i f ic t o plant s s o mammals a r e not a t r i sk. ACCENT ha s a n a c ute<br />

o ra l LDSO of >5 , 0 0 0 mg/ kg a nd i s n ot a s k i n sen si tize r. ACCENT h a s<br />

not s how n any mutag e nic, carci no geni c, nor t er at ogen ic effe c t s in<br />

any of t he completed ac ute a nd c hronic s t udie s . ACCENT has low<br />

t ox i cit i y t o fi sh, dap hnia, bobw h i te , qu a i l , a nd malla r d du cks.<br />

ACCENT is f o r mul at e d as a 75% ac t ive ing red i e nt. Compl e t e<br />

con trol of the l a be l e d weeds is ac hieved 2-4 we ek s a fter<br />

applica tio n a l t hough he rbicidal effec ts a ppear wi thi n a f e w da ys<br />

after t r e a t me nt. Chloros is and s hoo t gro wt h i nh ib it ion ca n be<br />

obse rved 5-7 da ys a f ter a pp l ica t on . Di f f er en ce s i n th e d eg re e of<br />

co nt r o l or se le c tiv i ty are b a s ed on d iffe ren t r a tes of me tabo l is m.<br />

ACCENT has been evalua t ed in over 500 fie ld t ri a l s by Dupont<br />

researchers, university cooperato rs , and i nde pe nde nt con tr ac to rs .<br />

These trials confirm tha t ACCENT has shown excellen t t o l e r a nc e<br />

across a wide number of cor n var ieties thus t h e r e a r e no v a r i e t a l<br />

r e s tri cti ons on t he ACCENT lab e l . ACCENT app led po st emer gence a t<br />

t he use ra te of . 66 02 produc t/acre ( . 5 02 a Lya ) ha s e xc el len t<br />

broad spec trum act -LvLt y on bo th perennial and ann ua l grass es a s<br />

well as on several key broadleaf weeds (Table 1). Pos t e mergence<br />

applica tio ns from th e 2 t o 6 leaf st age an d post di rec ted<br />

a pp l i c atio ns f or 6 t o 10 l e a f c or n a re curr ent l y labele d . Th e u s e<br />

of a crop oil c oncentra te or a non-i oni c s ur fa ctan t i s re quired .<br />

The addition of liquid nitrogen fer tilze r (e .g. 28 -0 -0 , 32 -0 -0) t o<br />

t he spray solution may improve cont rol of ce r tain weed s pecies .<br />

Cr o ps no rma l l y ro ta ted follo win g ACCENT- t re a t ed cor n have not<br />

s hown inj u ry . Th e ACCENT l a be l c urre ntl y r e qui r e s a 10 month<br />

interval f rom application of ACCENT t o rep lanting of so ybea ns ,<br />

whea t, popcorn , swee t corn , barley, dry beans and oat s . A 12 mon th<br />

recropping interval is required f o r alfa l fa .<br />

The ACCENT l a be l pr ohi b its i t s us e a f t e r t h e a pp lica t io n of a ny<br />

form ulation of soil -applied COUNTER, s ince unacce p ta b le co r n i nj ur y<br />

may occur . This i s the r e s u lt of an organophospha te in t era c ti on .<br />

However, the us e of other organophosphate soil i nsec t i cid e s prior<br />

to ACCENT ap pli ca t io n is per mit t e d . In a dd it i on , th e ACCENT la bel<br />

pro hi b i ts a pp l icat io n o f f o liar or ga nop ho s phat e s wi thi n 7 d a ys<br />

before or 3 days af ter ACCENT applic ation.<br />

1/ Develop ment Represen ta tives, Dupo nt Ag ric ultur a l Pr od ucts ,<br />

Bar lev Mi l l Pl aza, P.O. Box 80038, Wil mi ng to n , DE, 19880- 00 38


25<br />

WEEP SPECTRUM CONTROLLED BY ACC ENT AT . 6 6 0 2 P RODUCT I A:CRE<br />

SIZE RANGE<br />

HEIGH T ( INCH ES)<br />

Shatte rca ne<br />

Joh nsongrass<br />

see d ling<br />

rhi zome<br />

Sorghum<br />

Foxtai l s<br />

gi a nt<br />

yellow<br />

br istly<br />

green<br />

Fa ll penf.cum<br />

Bar-nyar-dqr-aas<br />

Broadleaf si gnalgrass<br />

Sa ndbur<br />

Wool ly Cupgrass<br />

Quackg rass<br />

4 -12<br />

4 -1 0<br />

8 -12<br />

4 -1 2<br />

2 -4<br />

2 -4<br />

2 - 4<br />

1 - 4<br />

2 - 4<br />

2 -6<br />

1 -2<br />

2 - 4<br />

2 -4<br />

4 -8<br />

BROADL EAVES<br />

HEI GHT ( INCHE S)<br />

l1or ninglory<br />

i vyleaf<br />

ta ll<br />

pitted<br />

Pi g we e d<br />

smooth<br />

redro o t<br />

Smar tweed , annual<br />

Jimso nweed<br />

2 - 3<br />

1 -2<br />

1 -2<br />

1 -4<br />

1 - 4<br />

1 - 4<br />

1 -3<br />

Op tim um herb ic idal ac t ivity fo r t h i s size range c a n be<br />

a chieved wi t h ACCENT a t . 6 6 02 product per a c r e . Howe v er<br />

weeds whi ch exc eed th e se h e i g ht ranges by 50 % may b e<br />

par tia lly con trolle d wi t h rates betwee n .6 6 and 1. ) 3 02<br />

product per a c r e.


26<br />

Canada Thistle Contro l in Wheat<br />

Mark S. Causey and Frank J. Webb'<br />

ABSTRACf<br />

Field exper iments were conducted in 1989 and 1990 to evaluate clopyralid and<br />

thifensulfuron + tribenuro n for their activity on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.)<br />

Scop) in wheat (Triti cum aestirium). Cont rol ratings were obta ined only for Canad a<br />

thistle. The wheat crop was planted conventiona lly in a clean seedbed each year. The<br />

plot design was a random complete block with three replications. The experiment was<br />

conducted at a different location each year in New Castle County, Delaware on<br />

Matapeake silt loam soil. Thifensulfuron + tribenuron was tested at rates of 0.23 and<br />

O.281b a.i./A alone and at O.231b a.i./A in tank-mixes with either .38 Ib a.i./A 2,4D<br />

ester or dicamba at .13 Ib a.i.j A. Clopyralid was tested alone at a rate of .33 Ib a.i./ A.<br />

Tre atments which contained thifensulfuron + tribenuro n alone or in combination with<br />

dicamaba or 2.4D ester all provided in excess of 91% control. Clopyralid alone had a<br />

control rating of 91.7% in 1989. In 1990 treatments containing thifensu lfuron +<br />

tribenuron alone or clopyralid alone provided 90 and 93% control respectively. In the<br />

1989 study when thifensulfuron + tribenuro n was tank-mixed with either dicamba or<br />

2,40 ester , no difference in control ratings was experienced, however, in 1990 when<br />

thifensulfuro n + tribenuro n was tanked-mixed with either dicamba or 2,4D ester, control<br />

ratings were significantly lower than when thifensulfuron + tribenuron was applied<br />

alone.<br />

'Extension Associate, <strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, University of Delaware<br />

Extension Specialist, <strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, University of Delaware


27<br />

EFF ECT IVENESS OF CLOPYRALID FOR THE CONTRO L OF<br />

BROADLEAF WEEDS IN VEGETABL E CROP S<br />

w. P . Cowgill ; J r. an d B . A . Majek '<br />

Abstract . Clopyralid effec tively contro ls many pere nnial and an nual<br />

broad leaf weeds in cludin g Canada t his tle [Cirsiu m~ (L . ) Seop. I . hairy<br />

gali nsoga [ Gali n soga cilia ta ( Raf .) Blake ) . common cock lebu r ( Xan lhi u m<br />

strumarium L .) . and common ra gwee d (Ambrosia arte mismolia L.). The ra te<br />

required to contro l seed ling a nnual wee ds was much lower tha n th e rat e<br />

required to contro l perennial wee ds . Canada thistl e was contro lled b y 0 .3<br />

kg/ha applied pos te merge nce . Annuals, suc h 8 S hair y gali nsoga , were<br />

contro lled by rates as low as 0.05 kg /h a. Pos temergence applicatio ns of<br />

clopyralid to cole crops , onion cro ps, and asparagus ca used no phytoto xic<br />

response and di d not re duce cro p yie ld or quality.<br />

INT RODUCTI ON<br />

Broadleaf wee ds continue to be a significan t p roblem in major vegetable<br />

production areas of th e USA . Cana da thistl e and oth er pere nnials are primaril y<br />

problems in perennial vegetable crops . Annual broad leaf weeds, su ch as hai ry<br />

galinsoga , common cock lebu r , common ragweed , eas tern bla ck nightshade<br />

(Solanu m pty canth um Dun . ) , and others are major prob lems in annua l veg etable<br />

crops .<br />

METHOD<br />

Field exp er iments were conducted in 1987, 1988, an d 1989 on muck soil in<br />

Warren County, and on coars e-tex ture d mineral soils in Cumber land and Salem<br />

Counties , New Jers ey . Clopyrali d , 3, 6-dichl oro -2 -pyri din ecar boxyli c ac id , was<br />

evaluated as a post emerge nce herbicid e in as pa ragus, onions, and sev eral cole<br />

crops at betw een 0.035 an d 0 .84 kg / ha . Cabba ge , b roccoli , cauliflowe r, brusse ls<br />

spro uts , collar ds , kale , mustard gr een s , an d Chin ese ca bbage wer e included in the<br />

cole cro ps evaluate d . All expe ri ments were evalua ted for phyto toxicity, effic acy<br />

and eff ect on yie ld .<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUS SION<br />

Cole cro ps (Tab le 1) and aspara gu s (Tab le 2) wer e not injur ed by<br />

post emer gen ce clopyra lid applica tions of 0.4 2 and 0. 84 kg/h a , resp ec tively .<br />

Onions (Table 2) wer e not injure d by two pos temerg ence applica tions of 0.28 or<br />

0.4 2 k g/h a per applica tio n alone or in combi na tion with met ha zole. Canada<br />

thistle contro l was acc ep ta ble in asp aragu s one year aft er clop yra lid was applied<br />

pastemer gen ce a t 0.28 kg/ ha in Jun e when the weed was 50 cm tal l (Tabl e 3) .<br />

Lower rat es pr ovide d temporary contro l, bu t res ults wer e not sa tisf actor y one<br />

year af ter tr eatmen t. Sen sitive annu al broa dleaf weeds , incl ud ing hairy<br />

galinsoga, common cocklebur , common ra gweed , and eas te r n bla ck ni ght sh ade ,<br />

wer e contro lled by pas temer gence applic ati ons of betwee n 0. 035 a nd 0. 20 kg /ha<br />

1 Agr. Age nt , Hunte rd on Coun ty , Flemin gt on , NJ 08822- 9058 an d Ass oc .<br />

Prof . • Rutgers Univ .• Br idg eton . NJ 08302-9 499


28<br />

Tabl e 1 . Crucif erae crop tolerance and yields following postemergence clopyralid<br />

applicatio n<br />

Clopyra lid (hg l h a)'<br />

Crop 0 .0 1ll 0 .1 0.2 0.3 0. 4 LSD (0.05)<br />

Cabbag e % inj . 0 0 0 8<br />

h g lha 32 ,928 30,240 34, 048 9,532<br />

Caulifl ower % inj. 0 0 0 0 NA<br />

h g lh a 84, 398 51 , 945 50,71 2 80,09 6 25 , 386<br />

Collar ds % inj . 0 0 NA<br />

Brocco li %inj . 0<br />

Brussel s sprouts %inj . 0<br />

Bok Ch oy %inj .<br />

Chin es e cabba ge % inj . 0 10<br />

Mustard % inj. 0<br />

Kale % in j.<br />

DCPA applied at planting<br />

'2 Hand - weed ed control<br />

at 8 kg/ha<br />

Table 2 . Liliaceae cro p tolerance and yield foll owing post emergence clopyralid<br />

appli cation<br />

Clopyra lid ( h gl ha)<br />

Cro p 0.0 ' 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 .4 L SD (0 . 05)<br />

Aspa ra gus %in j . 0 0 0 NA<br />

kg l ha 1, 329 1 , 263 1 , 604 1 , 690 344<br />

Onio n -y ellow" %inj. 0 0 0 0 9<br />

kg lh a 12,80 0 11,4 00 15 , 000 11,400 4 ,000<br />

Onion -t-ed " %in j . 0 0 0 0 10<br />

k g /h a 16,200 13 ,800 15, 600 13, 000 3,8 00<br />

Onion-gr ee n<br />

b u nchi ng" %inj .<br />

Leek" % inj . 25<br />

1 Hand-wee ded control<br />

'2 Dry bul b ; methazole applied post emer ge nce at 0. 55 kg /h a<br />

~ DCPA applied at planting at 8 kg/h a


29<br />

Table 3. Broadleaf weeds controlled by postemergence clopyralid applications<br />

Con tro l Clopyra lid (k g / ha)<br />

<strong>Weed</strong> ra ti ngs 0 0 .05 0 .1 0.2 0 . 3 LSD ( 0 .05)<br />

Aste r . whit e h eath % 75 8<br />

Cockle bu r. common % 93 100 18<br />

Galinsoga , hairy % 100 100 100 NA<br />

Gold enrod . Canada % 68 16<br />

Lambsqua r -ter , common % 10 0 63 24<br />

Mugwort % 68 13<br />

Nightsha de J eas te rn bl a ck % 100 100 NA<br />

Pigwee d. smooth % 13 20 30 24<br />

Purs lane, common % 0 0 0 7<br />

Ragweed , common % 90 90 33<br />

Shepher dsp ur s e % 0 9<br />

Sma r twee d , Pe nn syl vani a % 15<br />

This tle, Ca nada % 35 85 20<br />

Velvetleaf % 10 7 20 22<br />

(Tab le 3) . Inj ur y was simila r to tho se observe d fo llowing th e ap plica tio n of<br />

2.4 -D . Symp toms includ ed epina sti c respo nses, swelli n g of the growing poi nt ,<br />

and b ri ttl eness followed by d eath of sens it ive weed sp eci es . Smooth pigwe ed<br />

(Amara nt hus hyb ri du s L.). common lamb squart er (C he nopodiu m al bum L. ). common<br />

pur s lane ( Port u laca olerac ea L , ), common chickweed [S tellar ia medi a (L . ) v tu .} ,<br />

and velvetl eaf (Al b utilo n th eophrasti Medik.) were not contro lled b y clopyra lid.<br />

Clopyrali d app lie d pos temer ge nce ca used no in ju r y to s evera l vegeta b le crops .<br />

in cludin g aspa ragus. onio n s . and cole crop s . Canada t histle was con tro lled b y<br />

0.28 kg/ha . Sen siti ve a n nual weed s were controlled by lower rat es of the<br />

he rb ici de. Certain common b roadleaf weeds and gras s weeds are not controlle d ;<br />

th ere fore , clop yrali d shou ld be eval u ate d in combi na tio n wit h other her bi cides t o<br />

increase t h e spect r u m of weed s co n tro lle d.


30<br />

GROWTH RESPONSEOF YOUNG PEACH TREESTO<br />

CQt.l PETI TIONWITH SEVERALGRASSSPECIES<br />

W. V. Welke r' and o. M. Glenn 2<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The growt h of young peach tre es i s advers ely affecte d by compet ition<br />

f rom weeds and adja cent vegetat i on. The response of young peach tr ees to<br />

t hre e l evel s of cornpeti tion from three grass specie s was studie d for 2<br />

yea rs. Trees were grown i n thre e d i He rent size veget at io n- f ree squares<br />

(1,2 and 3 meters on a side ) within solid stands of t hree d i ffe rent gra ss<br />

species ['Kentu cky 31' tal l fescue (~ arund inace a Schreb.),<br />

or chardgrass (~ Q...!.Qm..!llil L.), and perenn ia l ryegrass (~<br />

~ L. )l . There was a direct rel a ti onsh ip between t he siz e of t he<br />

vegeta t i on- free area and th e growt h of th e peach tr ee f or both the f ir st<br />

and seco nd years of the s tudy. There was no effe ct on growth assoc iated<br />

wi t h grass spec ies during the f irst year . The gra ss species adjacent to<br />

the vege tation-free area had a s ignificant impac t upon growth of t he<br />

peach trees during the second y ear. ' Kent ucky 31' was t he most<br />

compet iti ve grass, f ollowed by orch ard grass , while perennial ry egrass was<br />

t he least compet i t i ve wit h th e peach t rees .<br />

1 <strong>Weed</strong> Scie ntist , USOA- ARS- Appa l achi an Fru i t Resear ch Stat ion,<br />

Kearneysvi l I e, WV25430.<br />

2 Soil Scientist , USDA- ARS- Appa l achi an Frui t Research Station,<br />

Kearneys vi l i e, WV25430.


31<br />

NEWHERBICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF<br />

TRIAZIN E-RESISTANT WEEDS IN NO- TI LL CORN<br />

R. L . RITTERlI<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Tri a z i n e -res i s tan t s moo t h pi gwee d (~~ L.) is D. major weed<br />

pr oblem in t he mid -Atla n t i c , nort he a s t e rn, lind u pper midwest regi ons o f the<br />

Unite d St at e s. Loca l i z ed inf e s t a tions o f t riazi ne-resistant co mmon lambs quarters<br />

( Chenopodium I\l..bYmL. ) a r e star ti ng t o be c ome wi despr ead through th es e r e gions<br />

as well. Yet , t h e s pr e ad of triazine- resista nt g iant f oxtail (~ ~<br />

Herrm. ) has been mi nimal s i n c e its di s c over y in 1984. To d a t e , mana g eme n t<br />

strategies of these weeds in no-tillage co r n (~ ~ L . ) hav e r el i ed up on a<br />

blanket preemer gence herbicide appli c at i on, such as me t ola ch l or. to provide<br />

ea r l y - s ea s on supp re s s ion. For contr ol o f esc aped t riazin e -resistan t broa d l e af<br />

weeds, a postemerge nce application of herbicides such as di camba o r 2.4 -D is<br />

ge ne r a l ly require d . Fo r control of tri azi ne- r esi stan t gi a n t f oxt ail e s ca pe s ,<br />

the only postemergence he r b i c i d e that ha s pr-ov t ded s ome d e g r e e of co ntrol until<br />

recen tly is pa ra quat, a ppl i e d po st-d irected. Over t h e pas t sev er al ye a r s, a<br />

numbe r of ex perime nt a l h e r b i c i de s ha ve be e n eval u ated for a c t i v i ty on those weeds<br />

i n cor n. Th e di scu s s i on , t h oug h, wil l be limit e d to co n trol of triazinere<br />

s i s t a n t smooth pi gwe e d a nd g ia n t foxtail.<br />

For tr i a z ine -r es i s t a n t smoot h pig weed , V-S3482 has provid ed e xce l l e n t<br />

pree mergence activi ty . For postemergence control of this we ed, CGA- 13 6872 , DPX ­<br />

V9360. pyr id a t e, a nd th i f en s ul fu r on have p r ov i d ed good t o excellen t co nt rol .<br />

For tri azine-resistant giant foxt ail . preem e r gen c e a ppl ic at ions of the<br />

microencapsulated fo r mulat ions of alachl or o r EPTC . as well as pr e emer g enc e<br />

applica ti ons of clomazone , have pro v ided good c ont r ol . DPX- V9360 has als o<br />

pro v id ed good to excel lent postem ergence c on t r ol of t hi s a nnu a l grass species.<br />

11 Assoc . Prof., Agr ic. Exp . St n. Ag r on . Dept. , unt v . o f MD,<br />

Coll eg e Pa r k , MD 20 74 2 .


32<br />

ANNUAL WEED CONTROL IN CORN WI TH SULFONYWREA HERBICID ES<br />

Rus se ll<br />

R. Hah n'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Fi eld exp e r i men t s we r e con ducted in 1989 an d 1990 t o ev alu ate se veral<br />

su l f ony l u re a h e r b i c i de s and s pray a djuva nt s for a nnua l gr a s s an d b roadl ea f weed<br />

co nt r ol i n fi eld corn (~ ~ L.). CGA·136872 and t hi f en s u lfu ron were<br />

eva l u ated f o r ve lvetleaf (Abut ilon tbeo phrasti Hedik .) and triazi n e-resi s tant<br />

c ommon lambsqu a rt ers (Ch en opodi um~ L.) c ontrol. DPX-V9360, DPX-E9636, and<br />

DPX-79406 were evalua t e d for control of lar ge crabgrass [~ sanguinalis<br />

(L .) Seop. ], fo x t ail ( Se t ari a sp p .). wild mus tard (~ arvensis L.) , and<br />

c ommon r a gweed (~ ar te mis! Ho lia L. ) . The ve l vet l e a f a nd lar ge crab grass<br />

exp e r i ments wer e c ondu cted on a gra vel ly lo am wi t h 4. 0 ' or ganic mat t e r whi l e<br />

cont ro l o f th e ot her species was eva luated on s ilt l oams wi t h 4 .5 % orga n ic<br />

matter. A ran domi ze d comp lete -b lock des i gn wi t h f ou r repl i c ation s was us e d i n<br />

each exp er imen t . He rbi c ide treatments we r e app l i ed in water to 10 by 25 f t pl ots<br />

usi ng 800 15 fl a t spra y ti ps mount e d on a c ompres s ed air bi cycle sprayer<br />

c alibr a t ed to deliver 25 gp a of spr ay so l ut ion .<br />

Vel vet leaf cont ro l wi t h 0.57 cz ai/A of CGA- 13 6872 was si milar to tha t<br />

obta i ne d wi th pos t eme r ge nce applications o f bromoxyni l at 0.38 l b ai / A or d icam b a<br />

at 0 .5 Lb a i/A , a nd be tter than t hat obta ined wit h 0. 06 oz al i A of<br />

t hl f ens ulf u r on . The addit ion of 4 % (v/v) 28% N to the s pray s o lu t ion i mpro ved<br />

v elvetl e af contro l with bo t h s ul f ony lu re a h e r b i c id e s when a no n i on i c surfactant<br />

was used. When app lied with 1% i v/v) c r cp- ot I conce n t r a te , only thifensulfuron<br />

a pp li c a ti on s b en e fited f rom th e addit ion of 28% N. Si mil a r r a t e s of CGA-136872<br />

and th i f ensul fu r on provi ded exce l lent c ontro l of triazine - r es istant co mmon<br />

lamb squarters with few di f ferences among spray a dditive s.<br />

DPX-V9360 an d DPX-E9636 at 0.50 oz ai/A with 1/ 4 % (v/v) of non i onic<br />

sur f actant pro v id ed exce ll en t f ox ta il and wild mus ta rd co ntrol when app l i e d e a r l y<br />

posteme r gence. The control o f t h e s e s pe c ies was similar t o that obtained vt tb<br />

2 l b ai/A cyanazi ne ap pli ed at t he s ame ti me. Howev er , rates o f DPX-V936 0 and<br />

DPX-E9636 up to 1 .0 and 0.75 OZ/ A r e s pe c ti v el y did not control common r agwe ed.<br />

Combination s of 0.50 OZ/A of DPX-V9360 wi t h 0.9 l b ai/A of atra zi ne or 0.25 l b/A<br />

of d icamba p rovided excellent common ragweed control. However. wi l d mus ta rd and<br />

foxtail co nt rol were not as goo d a s when DPX-V9360 was app l ied a lo ne. The<br />

comb i na ti on o f br omoxynil at 0 .25 o r 0 . 38 I b/A wit h 0. 5 oz/ A of DPX· V9 360<br />

i mpr ov e d common ragwe ed cont rol c ompa re d to DPX-V93 60 a l one bu t did not provide<br />

the sam e l evel of con t r ol as cyan a z i ne.<br />

Postemergence application of DPX-V9360 at 0.75 oz/A controlled large<br />

crabgrass as well as 2 Ib/A of cyanazine in 1989 . Control wich DPX- E9636 and<br />

DPX-79406 at 0.75 oz ai/A was better than wic h cy anazine . Application of 2 Ib / A<br />

of cya naz ine , 0 .75 oz/A of DPX·V9360. or 0 .5 oz/A of DPX-E9636 an d DPX- 794 0 6 when<br />

l a r ge c r ab gras s was i n t he c o t y l edo n to fou r -leaf sta ge f ail ed t o pr ovide<br />

acc eptab le cont ro l i n 199 0 . Howeve r, goo d large c r ab gras s co n t r o l was ob t a i ned<br />

wit h t hese r a t e s of t he s u lfonylurea herbicides when a pplied 6 d ay s la t er.<br />

'As scc . Pro f. . Dept . of Soil, Crop and Atmospher ic Sci.. Cornell Vniv. , It haca,<br />

NY 14853


33<br />

ALF ALFA AND OR CHARDGRASS CONTROL IN NO -TILL CORN<br />

N. L . Hartw ig!<br />

ABSTRAcr<br />

Glyphosate, 2,4-0, atrazi ne, simazi ne and dicamba treatme nts were applied in various<br />

combinations to a three year old alfalfa/gras s stand on the Penn State Agrono my Farm starting in<br />

the fall of 1987. The soil was a Murril l Silt Loam (Typi c Hapludult ) with a pH of 7.0. All<br />

treatments were applied with a tractor mounted smal l plot sprayer with 80015 extended range flat<br />

fan nozzles at 187 kPa and 187l1ha of water. A blanket treatment of Bullet? at 4tb ai/A was<br />

applied preemergen ce on 5/4/89. 'Pioneer 3475' com was planted in 4.57 by 6.1 m plots with a<br />

six row no-till plante r in 76 em rows on May 9, 1988 and May 22, 1989 with 110 kg/ha of 10-30­<br />

10 fertilizer in the row . No addi tional nitrogen was app lied in 1988 since com followed alfalfa but<br />

in 1989, 154 kg/ha nitrogen was sidedressed o n June 26. The alfalf a was 25 to 30 em and<br />

orchard grass 15 to 20 em tall and both were green and leafy when fall treatme nts were appl ied in<br />

1987. Early spring atra zine was applied Marc h 29. 1988 when alfalfa was just breaking<br />

dormancy. Al l pre treatme nts were applied May I I, 1988 when both alfalfa and orc hardgrass were<br />

2510 30 cm.<br />

Com growth and yields were drastica lly reduced in 1988 due to the driest grow ing season<br />

in 100 years. Alfalf a con trol was 89% or better for any treatment that con tained 2,4-0 LVE or<br />

dicamba in the form of Marksman- applied in the fall followed by atrazine + simazi ne at 2.92 + I<br />

Ib/A preeme rge nce. There was considerab le alfalfa recovery growth by June 28 wher e Marksman<br />

was used in the fall. Even the add ition of 2,4-0 to the mixture didn't improve alfalfa co ntrol. The<br />

addition of glyphosate controlled 80 to 97% of the grass with little recovery grow th later in the<br />

summer. Atra zine at O.92 1blA in the fall followed by atrazine + simazine at 2 + t ibiA<br />

preemerge nce gave almo st complet e contro l of both alfalfa and grass. This treatment was also one<br />

of highest yielding in the study. Corn stands were not affec ted by any of the treat ments. Com<br />

height and yield were generally significantly great er where fall applied glyphosate + 2,4-D LVE<br />

effective ly controlled both alfalfa and grass .<br />

The only preem ergence trearmems that effectively controlled alfalf a were those that<br />

contained 2,4-0 LVE. Even dicamb a in Mark sman wasn't quite as effec tive as 2,4-0 and where<br />

triazines were used alone the contro l of alfalf a was the worst. Grass contro l was generally not as<br />

good as from fall treatment s contain ing glyph osate but were usually not significa ntly diffe rent from<br />

the fall treat me nts.<br />

The lack of alfalfa and grass co ntrol carri ed ove r into the next growing season. The best<br />

alfalfa and orchar dgrass contro l was obtained from fall treatm ents conta ining 2,4·0 LYE and<br />

glyphosat e followe d by triazines in the spring. Com heights and yields were the grea test for these<br />

treatments for both the first and second years after treatment. Generally com heights and yields<br />

were only significantly red uced by reduced alfalfa and orc bardgras s co ntrol in the dry year of 1988<br />

and in 1989 mo st trea tme nts were not significant from each other.<br />

J Prof. of <strong>Weed</strong> Sci. , Dept. of Agron om y, The Penn sylvan ia State Univers ity, Universi ty Park,<br />

PA 16802<br />

2 Bullet = alachlo r + atrazi ne@ 2.5 + 1.5 lb ai/gaI<br />

3 Marksma n = K salt of dicamba + atrazine @ 1.1 + 2.2 lb ai/gal


34<br />

INIROD UCTION<br />

The primary "weeds" in this trial were a two year old stand of alfalfa (MedicagQsativa L.<br />

'Sara nac AR') and orc hard grass


35<br />

MATERIALS AND METIi ODS<br />

This trial was conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm at Rock Springs, PA. The soil<br />

was a Murrill silt loam (Typic Hapludult ) containing about 16% sand. 67% silt, 14% clay and<br />

2.5% organic matter. The area was limed to a pH of ?O before seeding the alfalfa and<br />

orchardgrass in 1985.<br />

Co rn 'Pioneer 3475 ' was planted in 76 em rows wit h a 6-row John Deere Max -emerge 0 0 ­<br />

till planter on May 9, 1988. A row fertilize r (1lD kg ha-! of 10-30-10) was applied with the<br />

planter. No additi onal nitrogen was applied since it wa s felt that the killed alfalfa wou ld prov ide all<br />

the nitrogen necessary for normal growth. Since 1988 turned out to have the driest June and July<br />

in 100 years,nitrogen was surely not limiting.<br />

Fall treat me nts were applied October 14, 1987 afte r a hard frost (-2°C) the night before.<br />

The alfalfa was 25 to 30 em and orchard grass 15 to 20 em tall and ro th were green and leafy at the<br />

time.<br />

Early spring atrazine was app lied Marc h 29, 1988 when alfalf a was ju st breaking<br />

dorma ncy . All pre treatments were app lied May 11, 1988 when bo th alfalfa and orcbar dgrass were<br />

25 to 30 em.<br />

In 1989, the whole trial area was treated with a blanket treatment of Bullet> to contro l<br />

annua l weeds withou t providing furt her contro l of alfalfa or orchardgr ass so the contro l of these<br />

species by the initial treatments could be evaluat ed the seco nd year .<br />

All trea tme nts were applied with a tractor mounted smal l plot spraye r with 8001 5 exte nded<br />

range flat fan nozzles at 187 kPa and 1871/ha of wate r.<br />

Out of fear of losing the trial. it was irrigated once with 501 m-2 of water with an overhead<br />

irrigation system in late June 1988.<br />

The alfalfa and orchardgrass yields were determ ined by harvesting all top grow th fro m a<br />

0.5 m 2 area from each plot in Aug ust or Sep tembe r 1988 and 1989. A sub-sa m ple was saved from<br />

random plots for dry weight determination. Corn sta nd and gra in yields were measured for three<br />

of the four middle ro ws of a six row plot 4.6 by 6.7 m in size . ANOV was run on percent co ntro l,<br />

alfalfa and gras s dry matter yields and com stand. height and gra in yields with the SAS statistica l<br />

package as a randomized complete block design with four rep lications.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSS ION .<br />

Com growt h and yields were drastica lly reduced in 1988 due to the driest growing season<br />

in 100 years . Subsoi l moisture was availab le since the rainfa ll for the previous five years was<br />

reaso nably normal . If the corn was able to get off to a good start and develop a root system deep<br />

enough to tap into this subsoil mo isture. com yields of 100 bulA were still possib le without<br />

irrigation . With one irrigation of 50 I m- 2 of water in late June, pote ntia l yields wer e probably<br />

increase d to 125 bulA.<br />

Alfa lfa control was 89% or better for any trea tment that contai ned 2,4- D LYE or dicamba in<br />

the form of Marksman applied in the fall when rated two days afte r com planting on Mayl l , 1988<br />

(fab le 1). Th ere was considerable alfal fa reco very grow th by June 28 whe re Marksma n was used<br />

5 Bullet = alachlor + atrazine@ 2.5 + I .5 tb ai/ga l


36<br />

in the fall. Even the addi tion of 2,4·D to the mixtu re didn 't improve alfalfa control. Th e same rate<br />

of 2,4-D app lied with glyp hosa te in the fall did a bett er job of co ntrolling alfalf a except at the<br />

lowe st rate of 0.25 + 0 .5 lb ailA. Also . the additi on of glyphosate con trolled 80 to 97 % of the<br />

gras s with little recovery growth later in the summer . Th e most amazing trea tment was atrazin e at<br />

O.921b1A in the fall followed by atrazin e + simazi ne at 2 + 1 IblA preeme rgence. Although it took<br />

half the summer, both alfalfa and grass was almost com pletely controll ed by fall. This was one of<br />

the highe st yielding treatme nts in the study.<br />

Com stands were not affected by any of the treatments. Com height and yie ld were<br />

generally sig nificantly greater where fall treatm ents (T2 to T4) effectively controll ed both alfalfa<br />

and grass.<br />

The preem ergence treatme nts had not been applied yet on May 11 so there was no co ntrol<br />

from these at this point in time. Atra zine at 2l b/A had been applied o n Marc h 29 which provid ed<br />

up to 18% grass co ntro l but no alfal fa co ntro l. Alfalfa yields later in the summe r indicat ed that the<br />

only preemergence treatments that effectively controlled alfalfa were those that contain ed 2,4-0<br />

LYE . Even dicamba in Marksman wasn't quite as effective as 2,4·0 and where triazi nes were<br />

used alone the co ntro l of al falfa was the worst. Grass contro l was generall y not as good as from<br />

fall treatment s co ntain ing glyp hosate but were usually not significan tly differe nt from the fall<br />

treatment s.<br />

Corn height s and yields were significan tly red uced as a resu lt of excess ive co mpet ition<br />

from alfalfa and grass early in the grow ing season for the spring trea tme nts .<br />

The lack of alfalfa and gras s control carried over into the next growing season as one might<br />

expec t (Table 2). Treatm ents 2 to 4 provided almost total control of alfalfa and orch ardgra ss and<br />

corn hei ght and yield were am on g the highe st in 1989 when mois ture was not a limiting facto r.<br />

Gen erall y alfalfa and orchard grass contro l was good for all treatmen ts and there was seldom<br />

significant 'redu ctions in com growth and yield s. If 1989 had been a little drier, one migh t hav e<br />

expec ted greate r competitio n from the uncontrolled alfalfa and orchardgrass.<br />

In concl usion , the best alfalfa and orc hardgrass co ntro l ca n be ob tain ed from fall treatm ent s<br />

cont aining 2,4-0 LY E and glypho sate followed by triazin es in the spring. Com heigh ts and yie lds<br />

wer e the great est for these trea tment s for both the first and sec ond years afte r treatmen t Ge neral ly<br />

corn heights and yields were only significan tly red uced by reduced alfal fa and orc hardgrass control<br />

in the dry year of 19 88 and in 1989 most treatme nts were not significa nt from each other.<br />

LITERATIJRE CITED<br />

1. Hart wi g, N.L. U npublished Data<br />

2. Hartwig, N .L. 19 86. Orchardgra ss control in no-tillage co m . Proc. Northe astern <strong>Weed</strong> Sci .<br />

Soc. 40:16-17.


Table 1: Firstyearalfalfaand orchardgrasscontrolresuhs andcorngrowth and yieldfollowing trc,ltmenls appliedfall ]987 and spring 1988.<br />

= 1~~""l~al~l:",a ,~ Yield Contr~rn S~-ield-<br />

Application ' Co = ntro<br />

Com<br />

No. Treatmen, Rate 5/11 6/28 9/2 5/11 9/2 Stand Height Yield<br />

(IbaJ/A) ( %) (lb/A) Ob/A) ( %) (lb/A) (plants/A) (em) (blJA)<br />

1.Glyphosate + 2,4-0 LYE(Fall) + .25 + 0.5 + 89 ab 364 b-e 139 b-e 80 e 21 e 22,579 a 122 ab 89 ab<br />

Atrazine 4L+ Simazine 4L (Pre) 2.92 + 1.0<br />

2. Glyphosate + 2,4-0 LYE (Fall) + 0.5 + 0.5 + 89. 170 cde 116 b-e 95 ab 183 abe 23,595 a 133 a 106 a<br />

Atrazine 4L+ Simazine4L (Pre) 2.92 + 1.0<br />

3. Glyphosate + 2,4-0 LYE (Fall) + 1.0 + 0.5 + 94 a 80 de 58 de 97 a 61 e 23,668 a 142 a 98 a<br />

Atrazine 4L + Simazine4L (Pre) 2.92 + 1.0<br />

4. Atrazine 900F (Fall)+ 0.92 + 50 b 35 e 9 e 86 be 2 e 22,288 a 143 a 106 a<br />

Atrazine 4L + Simazine4L(Pre) 2.0 + 1.0<br />

5. Marksman' (Fall) + 1.4 + 93 a 444 be 255 ab 0 e 486 a 22,143 a 109 be 83 abe<br />

Atrazine 4L + Simazine4L (Pre) 2.0 + 1.0<br />

6.Marksman' + 2,4-0LY E (Fall) + 1.4 + 0.5 + 96a 404bcd 249 abc Oe 133be 21,998 a 103be 60cd<br />

Atrazine4L + Simazine4L (Pre) 2.0 + 1.0<br />

7.A trazine 4L (E. Spr.) + 2 + O e 948 a 341a 3e 127 be 20,110 a 74 de 57 cd<br />

Simazine 900F + Atrazine900 F (Pre) 1.0 + .92<br />

8. Atrazine 4L (E. Spr.) + 2 + 0 e 320 b-e 104 cde 18 d 171 abe 22,869 a 108 be 89 ab<br />

Simazine90DF+ Marksmans (Pre) 1.0 + 1.4<br />

9. Atrazine 4L (E. Spr.) + Sim. 900F + 2 + 1.0+ 0 e 55 e 37 e 18 d 417 ab 20,764 a 103 be 70 be<br />

Marksman' + 2,4-0 LYE (Pre) 1.4 + .5<br />

10. Atrazine 90DF + 2.92 + 0 e 594 b 324 a 0 e 181 abe 20,255 a 70 e 41 de<br />

Simazine 90DF (Pre) 1.0<br />

II. Marksman' + Atrazine 900F + 1.4 + 2.0 + 0 e 239 cde 197 a-d 0 e 137 be 21,344 a 71 e 30 e<br />

Simazine 90DF (Pre) 1.0<br />

12. Marksman' + 2,4-0 LYE+ .1.4+0 .5+ O e 65 de 7500 O e 449ab 19,892 a 94cd 60e d<br />

Atrazine90DF+ Simazine 90DF (Pre) 2.0 + 1.0<br />

a Alfalfa andorchardgrassyieldsforJune 28 and September2 arereported on adrymatterbasis.<br />

b Columnmeans followedbythe same letterarenot significnmlydifferentat the 5%level according to Duncan'sMultiple RangeTest.<br />

C Marksman = K saltof dlcnmba + atrazine@ 1.1+ 2.2 Ib at/gallon.<br />

w<br />

~


Table 2: Second yearalfalfa andorchardgrass control results and com growth andyieldfollowing treatments applied fall 1987 andspring 19&8.<br />

If:llfa Orchardurass<br />

Applicati on Control Yield Control Yield<br />

No. Treatmenta Rate 7(3 8/20 7f3. 8/20 In ~ry Stand Height Yield<br />

(Ib iiiJA) ( % ) (Ib/A) ( % ) (IblA) ( ) (plants/A) (em) (bu/A)<br />

1.Glyphosate + 2,4-0 LYE (Fall) + 0.25 + 0.5 + 59 eb 57 be 99 0 25 b 40 a-d 18,150 a 148 abe 109 ab<br />

Atrazine 4L+ Simazine 4L (Pre) 2.92 + LO<br />

2. Glyphosate + 2,4-0 LYE (Fall)+ 0.5 + 0.5 + 94 ab 16 e 100 0 2 b 20 cd 21,054 a 160 ab 125 a<br />

Atrazine4L + Simazine4 L(Pre) 2.92 + 1.0<br />

3. Glyphosate + 2,4-0 LYE(Fall) + 1.0+ 0.5 + 97 ab 2 e 100 a 2 b 19 cd 21,707 a 158 ab 125 a<br />

Atrazine 4L + Simazine 4L(Pre) 2.92 + LO<br />

4. An-arine90 0 F(Foll) + 0.92 + 100 a I e 100 a 0 b 14 d 21,6350 167 0 133 a<br />

Atrazine 4L+ Simazine 4L (Pre) 2.0 + 1.0<br />

5. Marksman' (Fall) 1.4 + 80 abc 22 e 81 a 441 ab 28 bed 19,747 0 147 a-d 133 a<br />

Atrazine 4L+ Simazine 4L (Pre) 2.0 + LO<br />

6. Marksman' + 2,4-0 LYE (Fall) + 1.4+ 0.5 + 96 ab 8 e 79 a 657 a 24 bed 20,546 0 150 ab 108 ab<br />

Atrazine 4L + Simazine 4L (Pre) 2.0 + LO<br />

7. Atrazlne 4L (E'sp r) + 2.0 + 6 d 115 ab % a 88 ab 48 abe 20,764 a 126 cde 116 a<br />

Simazine 90DF + Atrazine 90DF(Pre) LO+ 0.92<br />

8. An-azine 4L (E.Spr)+ 2.0 + 28 d 106 ab 98 0 144 ab 41 a-d 20,618 a 138 b-e 121 a<br />

Simazine90DF+ Marksman?(Pre) 1.0 + 1.4<br />

9. Atrazine 4L (E.Spr) + Simezine 900F + 2.0 + 1.0 + 74 abc 25 e 80 a 338 ab 35 a-d 20,038 a 150 ab 120 a<br />

Marksman' + 2,4-0 LYE (Pre) 1.4 + 0.5<br />

10. Atrazine900 F + 2.92 + 6 d 112 ab 98 a 25 b 53 ab 19,239 a 124 de 120 a<br />

Simazine900 F (Pre) 1.0<br />

11.Marksman' + Attazine900 F + 1.4+ 2.0 + 4d 162 a 96 a 54 ab 60 a 18,586 0 118e 85<br />

Simazine 900F (Pre) 1.0<br />

12. Marksman' + 2,4-0 LYE + 1.4 + 0.5 + 64 be 19 e 83 a 441 ab 31 a-d 19,965 a 145 a-d 109 ab<br />

Atrazine 90DF+ Simazine90DF(Pre) 2.0 + 1.0<br />

a Treatment timings: Fa ll- 10/14/87, E.Spring - 3/29/88. and Pre~ 5/11/88. A blanket applicationof Bullet at 4.0 Ib ai/acrewasmade5/4/89.<br />

b Columnmeansfollowedby the same letterarenot significantly at the 5%level (P=O.05) according to Duncan's Multiple Range Test.<br />

C Marksman = Ksaltof dicamba + atrazine @ 1.1+ 2.2 Ib ai/gal<br />

w<br />

ce


39<br />

CONTROLOF QUACKGRASSWITH CGA-136872<br />

D. B. Vitolo, M. D. Johnson, G. Gillespie and S. W. PrussI<br />

ABSTRAcr<br />

CGA-136872 is a sulfonylurea herb icide developed by CIBA-GEIGY Corporation<br />

for control of various grass and broadl eaf weeds in com (Ul! ~ L) .<br />

CGA-136872 was evaluated at eleven sites in New York, Pennsylvania, and"<br />

Michigan for quackgrass (~~ [L 1Beauv.) control in com in 1990. The<br />

specific objectiveof these field trialswas to evafuate variousapplicationtimings,<br />

including split and early preplant applications, examine the effects of several adjuvants,<br />

and determine quackgrass populations in test sites treate d with CGA-136872 .<br />

Overall controi of quackgrass with CGA -136872 was excellent. CGA -136872<br />

applied at 40 ~ ai/ ha to 10 to 20 em quackgrass provided 95.5 % control when averaged<br />

across nine trials rated at least 40 daysafter application. Split applications<br />

of CGA-136872 at 20 g ai/ ha early postem ergence followed by 20 g ai/ ha late postemergence<br />

provided 97 % controlwhen averaged across four trials. Earlypreplant<br />

applications of CGA-136872 alone or in combination with atrazine + metolachlor provided<br />

excellent quackgrass control. Tank -ntixes of CGA-136872 with atrazine increased the<br />

speed of quackgrass control when compared with CGA -136872 alone.<br />

The addition of liquid nitrogen (28 % VAN) with either Crop oil, X-77, or Sun-it<br />

and CGA-136872 did not consistently improve quackgrass control compared to the<br />

additives alone. The addition of 9.3 I/ ha of liquid nitrogen increased quackgrass contro l<br />

inone trial but had no effect in a second trial.<br />

Quackgrass culms increased from 91/ m 2 to 527/m 2 over a 120 day period in<br />

untreated corn plots. Quackgrass stands treated wi t~ CGA- 13~ 872 at 40 g ai/ha<br />

early postemergence were reduced from 84 culms/ m to 30/m over the same 120 day<br />

period.<br />

I CIBA-GE IGY Corp. , Agricultural Division, P. O. Box 18300,<br />

Greensboro, NC 24719-8300


40<br />

Postem ergence Grass Control in Field Corn with<br />

Nicosulfuron and Primasu lfuron<br />

Mark S. Causey and Frank J. w ebb'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Field experiments were conducted in 1988, 1989 and 1990 to evaluate both<br />

nicosulfuron and primasu lfuron for their activity on~in field corn (ill mm<br />

L ). The experiments were performed on a sandy loam soil at the University of<br />

Delaware's Agricultural Experiment Station near Geo rgetown. Control ratings were<br />

obtained for both broadleaf and grass weed species. The com crop was planted<br />

conventionally in a clean seedbed each year. No preemergence herb icides were applied<br />

for either bro adleaf or grass weeds. The plot design was a random comp lete block Wi~<br />

four replications. Primasulfu ron was tested at rates ofC013, .018, .027 and .036 Ib a.i./ A<br />

and nicosulfuron at rates of .016, .031, .047 and .062 lli1r.r.;A. Crop oil conce ntrate w<br />

used as an adjuvant with nicosulfuron and a 80-20 no n-Ionic surfacta nt was used with<br />

prima sulfuron. All four treatment s of nicosulfuron provided in excess of 94% cont rol of<br />

large crabg rass (Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop) while the four primasulfuron treatments<br />

provided from 3 1.6 to 38.9% cont rol of large crabgrass . Primasulfuron pro vided in<br />

excess 91% control of common ragweed (.8..m.llli1si.a arte mjsjifolja L) at all fou r rates.<br />

The range of cont rol of common ragweed with nicosulfuron was from 34.2 at the low<br />

rate to 52.9% at the higher rate. Nicosulfuron provided 64.6 to 79.6% control of<br />

common lambsquarters (Che nopod ium .al.I2Y..m L ) while all four treat ments of<br />

primasulfuron provided in excess of 80% control. It is concluded that bot h pro ducts are<br />

equa l on shatterca ne, but nicosulfuron is far superior to primasulfuron on large<br />

crabgrass. Primasulfuron does control both common ragweed and common<br />

lambsqua rters bette r tha n nicosulfuron.<br />

'Exte nsion Associate, <strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, University of Delaw are<br />

Extension Specialist, <strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, University of Delaware


41<br />

IINtUAL GRASS


42<br />

LONG-TERM CONTROL OF QUACKGRASS IN CORN FOLLOWING<br />

POSTEMER GENCE APPLICATIONS OF CGA- 136872 AND DPX- V9360<br />

P. C. Bhowmik and B. M. O'Toole l<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Controlling quackgrass~~ (L.) Nevski.] in field com is a challenge because of<br />

its perennial growth habit. Currently there are two new postemergence compounds that are<br />

effective in quackgrass control. Experiments were initiated in 1988 to evaluate long-term control<br />

of quackgrass in field com. In one study, three rates (35, 70 and 105 gm ail ha) of DPX -V9360<br />

and three growth stages of quackgrass were examined . In the second study, five rates of DPX·<br />

V9360 (17,35, 70, 105 and 140 gm ai/hal and five rates of CGA-136872 ( 10, 15,20 , 24 , and<br />

30 gm ai/ha) were evaluated at the four- to six-leaf stage of quackgrass. These studies were<br />

continued in 1989 for regrowth study. Both studies were also repeated in 1989 and regrowth<br />

studies were continued in 1990.<br />

Each plot was 2.0 by 4.6 m and treatments were replicated three times in a random ized<br />

complete block design . Com 'Agway 584S' was planted May I I, 1988 and April 27, 1989.<br />

Treatm ents were applied on June 3. 21 and July I, 1988 and on June 2, 19, and 29, 1989,<br />

respectively , when the quackgrass was at the two- to three-leaf, four- to six-leaf, and seven- to<br />

ten-leaf stage. Treatments were applied with a COz-backpack sprayer at a pressure of 152 kPa<br />

in 187 U ha. X~ 77 was added at 0.25% (v/v) to all treatments in all studies. Quackgrass shoot<br />

number/400 em", dry weight, and control were determined at various times in each year.<br />

Quackgrass control was rated in July and August. Regrowth of quackgrass in the second year<br />

from 1988 and 1989 studies was examined by quackgrass shoot counts, shoot fresh weights, and<br />

quackgrass rhizome regrowth after incubation.<br />

In 1988 study , DPX-V9360 applied at the four- to six-leaf stage of quackgrass gave better<br />

quackgrass control (99 %) than the applications made at the one- to three-leaf stage (61%) 5 WAT.<br />

Regrowth study in 1989 demonstrated that, plots which had been treated at the four- to six-leaf<br />

stage showed the greatest long-term quackgrass control (85%) compared to the control (46%)<br />

obtained from the application made at one- to three-leaf and seven- to ten-leaf stage) . Similar<br />

results were noted in 1990 regrowth study.<br />

In the second trial, DPX-V9360 and CGA-136872 at all rates controlled quackgrass<br />

effectively 5 to 10 WAT. Regrowth of quackgrass in 1989 showed better long-term control with<br />

D PX ~ V9360 than with CGA-136872 treatments. Quackgrass control the following May (1990)<br />

was excellent in all treatments . Shoot regrowth and rhizome numbers were greater with CG A~<br />

136872 treatments than with DPX~V9360 treatments . In general, long-term quackgrass control<br />

was better with DPX-V9360 than with CGA-136872 .<br />

I Associate Professor and Research Technician, Department<br />

Unive rsity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003.<br />

of Plant and Soil <strong>Science</strong>s,


43<br />

INfERACI10N BElWEEN POSTEME RGENCE APPLICATIONS OF CGA·I36872 AND<br />

SOIL APPLIED INSECI1CIDES IN CORN<br />

M. D. Johnson. D. B. Vitolo, J. D. Abbott, S:M. Mosele y, S. W. Pruss,<br />

and P. J. Porpiglia<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Greenhou se and field trials were conducted in 19&&-1990 to evaluate the pote ntial<br />

for soil insecticides to inter act with CGA-136872 to cause com (~ .!lliU'S L ) injury and tn<br />

determineif thisinteraction couldbe favorablymanaged.<br />

A 1988 field test first demonst rated that postemergence applicat ions of CGA·<br />

136872 could interact with terbufos applied at planting to cause unacceptable corn injury<br />

when either product alone was safe. Greenhouse tests showed that only organophosphate<br />

soil insecticides had the potential to interactwith CGA-136872, and those ranked: terbufos<br />

> fonnfos > phorate > chlorpyrifos. Field tests in 1989 and 1990 supported this rank ing,<br />

but showed that CGA- 136872 applied over terbufos was the only combinatio n to result in<br />

unacceptab le levels of corn injury when labeled rates of the insecticides and CGA -136872<br />

were used. This terbuf os x CG A-136872 interaction was observed appro ximately 60% of<br />

the time. Fon ofos and phorate have shown the potential to interact with CGA-136872 in<br />

the field, but typically only at higher than labeled rates or when the CGA-136872 is applied<br />

within 20 days after planting. There has been little evidence of an interaction between<br />

chlnrpyrifos and CGA -136872 in field tests. All com hybrids tested have shown susceptibility<br />

to injury from the intera ction between CGA-136872 and terbuf os.<br />

Inter actions betwee n terbu fos and CGA- 136872 were reduced, but not eliminated ,<br />

by applying CGA-136872 late-post rather than early-post, applying the terb ufos in a ba nd<br />

rather than in-furrow, and by using a controlled release formulation rather than the l SG<br />

formulation of terbufos.<br />

j-ciiiA.GEiGY -o,rp. , Agricultural Division, P. O. Box 18300, Gre ensboro, NC 27419-8300


44<br />

EFFECT OF VIRUS OISEASES ONCORNAS INFLUENCEDBY VARI ETY,<br />

JOHNSONGRASS CONTROL METHOD, ANDINSECTICIDE APPLICATION<br />

E.S . Hagood, L.A. VanLies hout, and C.C . Kenl ey<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Fie l d exper i ment s were conduct ed t o evalu ate t he effect<br />

of va r i ety, met hod of john song ra s s (S or ghum hal apense (L.) Pers.)<br />

contr o1, a nd ; nsec t i ci de app 1; cat; on on developme nt of Mai ze<br />

Dwar f Mosai c Virus and Maiz e Chlorotic Dwarf Viru s di s ea s es in<br />

field cor n (lea mays (L.). The research was conducte d near<br />

Black sb urg , VA on a Ros s si lt l oam of 2. 0% organi c matter con te nt<br />

and soil pH 5 .9. The experimental des ign was a 3-way (2x5x2 )<br />

f act or i al of corn variety x johnsongra ss cont rol met hod x inse c­<br />

t i ct de app1i cat; on . lev e1s with ; n ea ch fa ct or wer e 1) cor n var i ­<br />

et y: 5$- 565 (vir us s usce ptibl e ) and 5S-84 4 (viru s t ol er ant ), 2)<br />

john songras s control method : OPXV-9360, CGA-136872. 91yphose te ,<br />

mechanic al. and control, and 3) i nsecticid e: methomyl pl us<br />

es fen vale r ate and no insect i ci de . Applica tion r at es fo r<br />

OPXV-9 360 , CGA-1368 72. gl yphos at e, mathcmyl , and esfen va1erate<br />

were .040, .035, 2.00 •. 100. and . 055 kg a f/h a, respe ct iv ely .<br />

App1i cat i ons were made to 8-9 1eaf corn and 30-40 cm j ohns ongrass<br />

using 220 L/ha at a press ur e of 210 kPa wit h 8003 flat fa n tips.<br />

Visu al evalua t i ons of cor n vi gor r educt io n and j ohnsongr ass contro<br />

1 wer e made throughout th e growi ng season .<br />

Significa nt ef fect s of cor n var ie ty and john songrass cont ro l<br />

method on disease severity and corn yi eld were observ ed. In later<br />

evaluations , virus damage was 40 and 13% in sus cepti ble and tol ­<br />

era nt vari et i es, r es pecti ve1y. Vir us expr ess i on was grea te r in<br />

plots where j ohnsongr ass was controlled wit h g1yphosat e (29%)<br />

than in plo ts where johnsongra ss was controll ed via CGA- 136872,<br />

OPXV-9360, or mechanical means (8 , 6, and 3%. respectively).<br />

Virus symptoms were great er for bot h cor n var iet i es wher e j ohnsongr<br />

ass was cont r oll ed t han wher e no johns ongra ss cont r ol was<br />

implemented . These valu es were 56 and 24% for the su sc epti bl e<br />

var iety in plot s receiving johnsongrass cont rol and no contro l,<br />

r es pect iv ely, and 15 and 11%for the tol era nt var i et y i n plot s<br />

r eceivi ng joh nsongr as s contro l and no contro l , res pect iv e ly . Corn<br />

yields were clo sely correlated with diseas e sev erity . and were<br />

reduced by 20-30% in response to severe virus infect i on .<br />

Associate Professor. Graduate Research Assistant, and Agricu l ­<br />

t ural Manager , Virg inia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061


45<br />

CORN VARIETAL TOLERANCE TO VIRA L DIS EASE AS INFLUENCED BY<br />

CGA- 1 3 6 8 7 2 APPL IC ATIONS TO JOHNSONGRASS<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Maize Dwa rf Mos a ic Vi rus (MDMV) and Maize Chloro tic Dwarf<br />

Virus (MCDV) a re ins ect tra ns mitte d viral diseases of joh nso n ­<br />

g rass [Sorghum halape nse ( L.) Pers.] th a t also infect c o r n (~<br />

~ L . ) . Fiel d obs erva tion s h av e sh own that ' s ele c t i v e po st e mer ­<br />

genee contro l of jo hnso ngr ass wit h s u lf ony l ur e a h erbic id e s can<br />

i ncr e a s e t he in cid e nce of t he s e di s e a se s i n co r n . In s e c ts feed<br />

on j ohn so ng ra ss which i s t he pr i ma ry ho st of bo t h MDMV a nd MCDV.<br />

Whe n t h e j ohnsong r as s is c ont r oll e d , the con taminated insect<br />

vec to r s move t o t he secondary host , co rn, a nd transmit the<br />

diseas es dur ing th e nor ma l feed ing p r ocess. The r e s u l t i ng<br />

symptoms (d iscolored and s tu nted corn) can easily be misin te r ­<br />

pe rat ed a s herb i c id e in jur y s i nce the t he i nsec t vec to rs are not<br />

ve ry mob i le a nd in f ec t io n is u sual l y li mit e d to the h e r b i c id e<br />

t r eat ed ar ea.<br />

Many see d corn companies have varie ti es t hat are resistant<br />

t o MDMVa nd MCDV but fie ld testing for t o le r a nc e has been limit ­<br />

ed to t rials whe re corn i s grown i n the presence of actively<br />

growing johnsongr ass . Thus, rese a rch was ini ti a t ed in Maryland ,<br />

Virg i n ia, and We st Vi r g in ia to de t ermi ne i f genetic to l e rance t o<br />

HDMV an d MCDV wou l d be a deq ua te when i nf ecte d j ohn s ongr a s s was<br />

s e lec t i ve ly control led wi t h po stemer g ence app l ic a t io ns of CGA­<br />

13 6872. A t otal of eighte en hy bri ds wer e t e st e d i n fi ve r e pl i­<br />

cat ed f i e l d t r i als.<br />

Average di s ea s e l e ve l s r an ge d f rom very low f or a report ed ­<br />

ly " v iru s r-e a Ls t e nt; " var ie ty t o e xt remely hi g h for a kn own<br />

suscepti ble hyb r id. Four o f the var ieties had excellen t tol er ­<br />

ance a t a l l lo c at i ons whil e seve ral ot he rs displ ayed res ista nce<br />

th at var ie d wi t h l ocati on . Numerous var i e t ies wer e i nte r med i a te<br />

i n t oler an c e t h a t might be a dequa t e un der les s seve r e disease<br />

con d i t ions. The use of viru s t o le rant var i e ties can pr event t he<br />

development MDMVand MCDV in c orn following johnsong rass co n ­<br />

tr o l .<br />

I Se ni or Scie nti st, Agric. Di v ., Ciba -Geig y Corp. , Centrev i lle , MD<br />

216 17 , Corn Br ee de r , FFR Coope ra t iv e, Pr ovi d en c e For ge , VA 23 140 I<br />

Associ a te Pro f e s s or, Va. Pol y t ech . ln st. a n d State. Un iv. ,<br />

Bl acks bur g , VA 2406 1 , Assoc ia te Pr of e s s or , Agronomy Dep t. , Uni v.<br />

of Maryland, Co l l e ge Pa rk , MD 20742, and Exten sion Specialis t ,<br />

West Vi rgin ia Univ ., Morga nt own , WV 26505


46<br />

Potential for Cultivation and/or Band Application for Full Season <strong>Weed</strong> Control in<br />

Com (Zea mays L.)<br />

Lynn D. Hoffman, Greg W. Roth and Joanne Stellingwerf 'l<br />

Three field experiments were conducted in 1989 and 1990 to evaluate band and broadcast<br />

herbicide applications and cultivation for weed control in conventional and no-till com. In<br />

the 1989 trial, com yields were not different under conventional tillage with either a<br />

broadcast herbicide (5.6 L Bicep2/ha plus 1.13 kglha glyphosate in no-till treatments), a<br />

band herb icide plus cultivatio n, or a singl e cultivatio n. Addi ng a cultivatio n to the<br />

broadcast he rbicid e trea tment also did not imp rove yields . In no- rill treatm ents, yields were<br />

approximately 1250 kglha higher where a broadcast herbicide was used compared to a band<br />

applica tion wi th a cul tivation. Com yields obta ined with a full rate broadcast herbi cide<br />

were more than 2500 kg/he greater compared to a single cultivation in no-till. The<br />

ineffectiveness of band applications and cultivation under no-till was due to increased.<br />

competition from quackgrass (Agropyr on rep ens (L.) Beauv.) and yellow nutsedge<br />

(Cyperus esculentus L. ). The 1990 trials consisted of factorial arrangements of tillage (notill<br />

and conventional). cultivation (none and a single cultivation at V6). full and half<br />

herbicide rates (5.6 and 2.8 L Bicep/ha plus 1.13 kg/ha glyphosate in no-till treatments).<br />

and broadcast and band herbicide placement. The experiment was conducted at two<br />

locations that varied in weed pressure-. one was planted into wheat stubble and had<br />

significant weed pressure from yellow nutsedge, green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.),<br />

redroot pigweed (Amaran thus retroflexus L.) and dandelion (Taraxacum officina/e) and the<br />

second was planted into soybean stubble that had little weed pressure. Cultivation had no<br />

significant impact on yields in either study. In both studies, a significant tillage by method<br />

interaction indicated no yield difference between banding and broadcast applications under<br />

tilled conditions. but a marked yield advantage to broadcast applications under no-till. This<br />

difference averaged 1250 kg/ha in the low weed pressure study following soybeans and<br />

approximately 1900 kglha in the study following wheal Adding a cultivation to the band<br />

treatment did not overcome the negative effect of banding in no-till in either of the two<br />

studies. In both studies there was no yield advantage to using the higher herbicide rate,<br />

even under no-till conditions. The results of these studies confirm that responses to<br />

cultivation on the well drained Hagerstown soils used in this study are negligable and that<br />

band herbicide applications are most suited for corn production systems that include tillage.<br />

1Senior Research Associate, Assistant Professor,and Research Technician,<br />

Department of Agronomy. Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802<br />

2Bicep is a mixture of 0.40 kg metolachlor and 0.32 kg atrazine per liter.


47<br />

CULTIVATION ANO BA ND APPU CATION OF HERBICIDE IN MAIZE<br />

Jane Mt. Pleasant !<br />

and<br />

Can Bannon"<br />

ConcernU!lerthe potentialenvironmentallmpaetofpesticideusehasrenewedInterest Inmechanical<br />

weedcontrol. Cultivation effectively controls weeds In row crops but three or four cultivations may be<br />

needed for acceptabl e control in the absence of herbicides. <strong>Weed</strong>s in the row can be particularl y difficu lt<br />

to control wit h cultivatio n alone . A field experi ment was conducted to dete rmine if a rotary hoe and/or band<br />

appllcatlon of herbicide In combination with one cultivatIon would control weeds in corn as well as a<br />

broadcast application of herbicide .<br />

The experiment was established at two sites in New York In 1990: Aurora Research Farm in Cayuga<br />

County and a private farm in Mad ison County. Five treatments were appli ed in a rand omiz ed complete<br />

block desIgn w ith four repllcatlc ns et each site. Treatments we re: 1) broad cast herbicid e; 2) broadcast<br />

herblcide-p1us-cuhlvation; 3) band herbicide-plus-rotary boe-plus-cultlvatlon; 4) rotary hoe-p1us-cultlvation ;<br />

and 5) rotary hoe-plus-reduced rate broadca st herbicide. The broadcast herbicide tr eatment used atrazlne<br />

oIb aI/A) and pendlmethaJin (1.5 Ib ai/A) at Aurora and atrazlne 0 lb/A) and metolachlor (2 Ib aI/A) in<br />

Madison County . Similar rates were applied In a ten-inch band CfIIer the com rrm . The reduced rate<br />

herbicide treatment was applied broad cast at one-third the full rate.<br />

There wer e no differences in com grain yields amo ng treat ments at either site, but weed levels<br />

differed by treatment at both locations. In Madison County the broadcast herbicide treatment had the lowest<br />

weed cove r (3%) and the rotary hoe-p1us-cultivation the highest (15%). At this site brood leaf weeds<br />

dominated aUtreatments except th e rotary hoe-plus-reduced broadca st treatm ent wh ere gra sses comprised<br />

most of th e weed populatio n.<br />

At Aurora. broadcast herbicide had the highest weed cover (31%). <strong>Weed</strong> cover In th e othe r four<br />

treatments ranged from 8 to 20%. At this site hedg e bindw eed~~ (L ) R. Bt.) and yellow<br />

nutsedge ~~ L ) were common weeds . They we re not controlled by atrazjre plus<br />

pendlmethalln alone but the rotary hoe and/ or cultivatio n reduced their levels in all other treatments.<br />

'Assistant Professor, Departm ent of Soil, Crop and Atmospher ic Scienc es, Corn ell University, Ithaca. NY<br />

14853.<br />

lFleid Crop Agent , Oomell Cooperative Extension . Syracuse, NY 13024.


48<br />

REDUCING ATRAZINE RATES FOR ANNUAL<br />

BROADLEAF \lEEDS I N CORN<br />

Paul J. Stac howski and Russell R. Hahn'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Two s t r at eg ies fo r r edu ci n g atr a z in e r a tes we r e evalu at ed at: sev en sit e s<br />

i n 1989 an d 1990 . The fir s t st ra t egy was t o app ly redu ced r a t e s of atra z i ne<br />

postemergence wi th a nd without c rop-of I concentrate (CDC). Si mi lar rates of<br />

atrazine were a lso applied preemergence for c ompariso n. The secon d st rat.egy ·...as<br />

to appl y alternate herbicides postemerg ence alone, and with r e d uc e d rates of<br />

a t r a z i ne. The alt ernate h erbicides were dicamha at 0. 5. pendimet h a lin at 1 . 5,<br />

bromoxynil at 0.25 , bentazon at 0.5 with COC at U (vj v). a nd py r idate at 0 .45<br />

o r 0 .90 Ib a i /A.<br />

Convent io na l til lage was used at a l l sit e s . Pr e eme rg ence treatm en t s we re<br />

a pplied on the day of pla n t in g or with in 3 da ys a fte r plantin g. Postem ergence<br />

tr eatments were ap plie d when c orn (~ ~ L .) had four t r ue l e av e s . Spra y<br />

solutions were applied with a CO 2<br />

b a ck pack s prayer deli verin g 20 gpa a t 30 ps i .<br />

The exp erimental des ign was a randomized co mplete b l ock des i gn wit h four<br />

replic a tions. Cont rol dat a was collected fo r common lambs quarte r s (Chenopod ium<br />

a l bum L.) , redroo t pigwe ed (Amar anthus retrofl exus L.). s moot h pigweed<br />

(Ama r an t hus hybridus L. ), wild mustard (Sinapsis arvensis L . ) . c ommon ragw eed<br />

(Amb r os i a artemi s Ufolia L.), and velvetleaf (~ theoph r a sti Medi k .).<br />

Triazin e-resistant biotypes of common l amb s quar t er s and s moot h pi gwe ed were<br />

presen t at some sit e s . <strong>Weed</strong> control ratings we r e tra ns f ormed to the a rcsine and<br />

sub ject ed t o ana lysis of variance . Two sets of ort hog on a l co nt r a s t s were made .<br />

One set to e xe n dne t he atraz i ne ti mi ng a nd rate main effects and their<br />

i nteractions . The second set t o de t e r mi ne d i f f e r enc es a mong th e a lte r nate<br />

herbi cid es a nd how t he addition of atrazine affec t e d weed con t r o l. The<br />

i nter a c t ions of al ternate herbic ides and the add itio n of at raz in e were also<br />

a na ly ze d .<br />

Dicamba was th e onl y alternate herbic ide that gave good co ntrol of the<br />

triazine -resista nt smooth pigweed . All the altern a te herb i cides gave good<br />

control of th e tri azine-res is tant common l ambs quar t e r s. Atraz i ne a t 0 .5 l b/ A<br />

po stemerge nc e with CDC pe r f orme d a s well as 1.0 or 1.5 lb / A pr e emergen c e f or a ll<br />

s pe c ies exce p t f or wi l d mus t a r d and vel vet l e af. Atr a zin e appl i e d pr e eme r gen c e<br />

at 0 .5 I b/A gave excellent wild mus t a r d contr ol bu t 1. 0 Ib / A of at r a z i ne wit h CDC<br />

was re quired pos t e me r ge nce for excel lent cont r ol. Ve l ve tl e a f was no t a de qua t e ly<br />

co nt ro lle d by preem ergence atra zine applicat ion s up t o 1. 5 Ib/A a nd 1. 0 Ib/A wi th<br />

COC was req u i r e d po s t emergenc e for adequa te contr ol. An a lte rnate he r bicide with<br />

a tr a zln e at 0. 5 l b/ A controll ed each of the weed species as ....el l as . or bet te r<br />

than 1. 5 lb /A of a trazine preemergen c e. Add i ng atrazine a t 0 .5 Ib/A to the<br />

a l t e rnat e he rbicid e s impr oved t h e le vel and s pec t r um of control.<br />

'Grad. Student, Pla nt Pro tec tion and Assoc. Prof., De pt . of Soil . Cr op a nd<br />

Atmos ph eri c Sci . , Cornell Un iv. , Ithaca . NY 14 853


49<br />

REDUCED HERBICIDES RATES IN CORN'<br />

A.J. ENACHE , R. O. ILNICKI and H . WATERS z<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

wit hi n t he gen er al concep t o f sus tainab le agr ic ul ture, th e<br />

use of reduce d h er b i ci d e r at e s may be a solu tion t o j.cv e r-. t he<br />

impac t he r b i c i de s have on product ion c os t s and on env i r onmental<br />

pol lu tion . Se vera l standa rd herbicides were e valu ated in c or n ( Zea<br />

!!@.Y§ L.) at the Adelphia Research Cent er , Free hold, Ne w Jer sey i n<br />

1990 . The object i ve of this stud y was t o de t e rm in e wh e t h e r r educe d<br />

herbicide rates can pro vid e sa tisfac to ry weed c on t r o l as the weed<br />

contro l of the full rate .<br />

The s tudy co ns isted of t hr e e rep licates in a r a nd omi z e d b lock<br />

des ig n . Fo u r r ows of cor n v ar. 'Mid st a t e s 74 7' we r e pla nt e d May 24<br />

i n a Sa s safras lo a m so il wi th pH 6 .3 and 1.9% organic matter. Plot<br />

size was 3 .6 by 5.7 m. Treatments i nc l ud e d appli cations o f 0 .25x ,<br />

0. 5x, 0 .75X , a nd 1x r ates (lx "" recommended full r ate) of premixes<br />

of me t ol a c h l o r , al ach lor, cy anaz ine, and pe ndi meth ali n wi t h<br />

a t ra z i ne , and me t o la c h lo r follo wed by eit he r 2, 4 0 ami ne or di c amba<br />

+ atrazine pre mixes . He r b i c i d es we r e a pp l i e d pree mergenc e (PE),<br />

del a y ed p re emerge nce (OPE) , a nd postemergen ce (PO) on May 25, June<br />

7, a nd June 18 , resp e cti vel y . The mos t pr e va le nt weeds on th e site<br />

included redroo t pig we ed (Amaranthlls re t r o f le xus L .) , common<br />

lambsqua r ters (Chenopodium 9.lmdmL.) , i v yl e a f morni ngg lory (~<br />

~ L. Ja c q. ), a nd fal l pan icurn (pa n i c urn d ic hotorniflo r um<br />

Michx. ) . <strong>Weed</strong> co nt rol rati ngs were made JU ly 16, 1990 .<br />

We observed that 0. 75x rate (PE) o f me t o lac hlo r + a t r a z i ne<br />

pro vi d e d similar contr ol to the full r ate ( IX) f or all we eds<br />

ev aluated . Alac h l o r + a t r a z i ne at 0. 25x ( PE) fo l l owe d by 0 .25X<br />

(OPE) result e d i n th e s ame co ntrol a s Lx (PE) . Good weed c ontr ol<br />

was obtain ed with O. 25x alo ne e xc ept for fall pan I c um. No<br />

diff erences in we e d c on trol of Lx and se qu e nt i a l a pp l i ca tions o f<br />

O. 25 x (PE) f ollowed by 0.25 x (OPE) o f c ya na z i ne + a't r -azLne or<br />

pend imet halin + atrazine resulted . Th e s ame pattern was e vid ent<br />

with met ol a c hl or (0 . 25x PE + o. 25x OPE) f o l l owe d by 2 ,4 0 ami ne<br />

(PO) . The 0 .5x meto iachior fo l lowed by dic amba + a t razine showed<br />

t he same potential to control weeds as th e full rate of<br />

me to l a c h l or .<br />

This pr eli min ary s tu dy in dica ted th at the O. 5x rat e of mo s t<br />

of t he herbic ides e valua ted p ro vided t he s a me de gree o f we e d<br />

c ont r ol as th e ful l rate .<br />

1 New J e r s e y Agric. Exp . Stn . PUbl icatio n No . J-15472 - 1-90 .<br />

a Res . ASSOC. , Res. Prof. <strong>Weed</strong> sci ., and Grad . s t ud e nt ,<br />

res pectively, crop s c i. Dept . , Rutgers Univ . , New Jerse y.


50<br />

Influence of Tillage and Prior Year <strong>Weed</strong> Control on Herb icide Efficacy<br />

in Com (Zea mays L.)<br />

Greg W. Roth, Joanne Stelli ngwerf and Lynn D. Hoffman ]<br />

Four field experiments were conducted to determine the influence of prior weed control<br />

levels on the effi cacy of comb inations of atrazine and meto lachlo r app lied at various rate s.<br />

In twO studies. 0,7 5 and 100% weed control levels wert established in 1989 using<br />

nonselectiv e herbicides. 10 1990. tillage treatments were imposed across the weed control<br />

levels. The tillage subplots were further divided into subplots that recieved four rates of<br />

Bicep2 applied preemerge nce at 0, 2.1, 3.2 and 4.21.1ha. No-till treatments als o reci eved<br />

gramoxo ne at 0.5 1 kglha. Broadleaf and grass weed control ratings and pop ulation data<br />

were collected at four and eight weeks after planting. Corn yields and moisture contents<br />

were determined at harvest Results of these experiment s indicated that both tillage and<br />

prior years weed control interact to determine the herbicide rate where acceptable control<br />

and optimum yields occur. Where tillage and 100% weed control were imposed together<br />

optimum yields were achieved at both locations with the 2.1 l..JhaBicep rate. Where no<br />

control was applied in the previous year, the tilled plots reached max imum yields at the 3.2<br />

Llha rate. Similar response s occured in the no-till treatments, except that yields reached a<br />

maximum at the 4.2 L/ha rate in the plots that had good control in the previ ous year. Where<br />

there was no control, the maximum rate of 4.2 L/ha used in the study was not enough to<br />

achieve maximum yields. Responses to the herbicide treatments were generally greater at<br />

the Landisville site, where the soil weed seed population was about ]0 times greater than at<br />

the Rock Springs location. These results confirm recommend ations that higher rates of<br />

herbicide are needed under no-till conditions and that both weed con trol in the previous<br />

year and soil weed seed popu lation affect the need for herbicides. Response data from two<br />

additional on-farm studies suppo rted these resul ts. No weed control or yield response to<br />

increasing rates of metolach lor from 0.825 kg/ha to 3.3 kg/ha applied with 1.1 kglha<br />

atrazine preemergence was measured in a no-till field with a history of excellent weed<br />

control. In another no-till com field with a history of serious fall panicum (Panicum<br />

dichotomiflorum Michx.) infestations, adequa te control was achieved with only a<br />

combination of tillage and at least ],65 kglha metolachlor in comb ination with 1.1 kglha<br />

atrazine. Overall, these studies suggest that consideration of anticipated weed pressure and<br />

the use of tillage can both contribute to lower herbicide use and improved profitabliry.<br />

lAssistant Professor, Research Technician, and Senior Research Associate, Department of<br />

Agronomy, Penn State University, University Park. PA 16802


51<br />

STUD IES ON THE GERMINATION<br />

REQUIRE MENTS OF NODD ING BEGGARTI CKS<br />

~~L. )<br />

Diane L. Benoit'<br />

Nodding begga rticks~~L. ) is an important weed in carr ot fields in organ ic<br />

soils of Quebec . Field eme rgence studies indicated that this species had a short eme rgence pe riod<br />

in early spring (from the last week in April to the third week of May). The purpo se of this<br />

experiment was to characterize the germi nation requirements of noddin g begganicks . A factorial<br />

experiment with four repetitio ns was set up in 1988 where the factor s under investigation were<br />

nine germination temperatures (5. 10, 15, 20, 30"C constant, 20-5 °. 25 . 10°. 30- 15°C alternating),<br />

two solutions (absence or presence of KNO l<br />

) and intact vs nicked seeds of differe nt ages ( 1984<br />

to 1988). Although all seeds were still viable, none germinated at SOor 1000Cregardless of the<br />

treatments. The presence of KNO) did not influence the germinatio n of nodd ing beggarticks ,<br />

Nicked seeds, where the enve lop around the embryo was da maged , germina ted faster than nicked<br />

seeds where the embryo was undamaged. Intact seeds did not germin ate eventhoug h they were<br />

viable regard less of their age . Alternating temperatures stimulated germination of intact seeds.<br />

Thus, it seems probable that seeds which have overwintered on the soil surface as well as seedbed<br />

preparations earl y in the spring may damage the seed coats of nodd ing begganicks and stimulate<br />

their germination resulting in large seedli ng populations in the spring.


52<br />

SURVEY OF NOXI OUS THI STLE S PECI ES I N SELECTED COUNTI ES IN MARYLAND<br />

Phil i p w. Ti p pi n g !<br />

A BST RAC T<br />

A s u rvey of t h r ee Ce nt r al Mar y l a n d c ount ie s to d eter mine the<br />

a ve r ag e den si ty a nd r e l a t i v e a bu nd a n c e o f fou r n o xiou s th istl e<br />

s pecies wa s co nducted in 1 9 8 9. Th e area s u rveyed i n c l u d e d<br />

Washin g ton, Fr ed eri ck , and Car r o l l Co u n t ies , whi c h co mp ris e<br />

h i s t or i call y the r e g i o n most af fec t ed b y i ntro duc e d t h is t le sp ec i es<br />

in the genera Carduus and £in.i.wn .<br />

The f our th i stle s p ec i es th at we re re c orded wer e musk thistle<br />

(~ t h o e r mer i Weinm.) . pl ume l e s s t hi stle (~ a can th a i d es<br />

L . I, Cana da thistle {Cirsium a rve n se f L . ) Seop .] I a n d b u ll thi s tle<br />

(C irsi um~ t Sav i I t'enc e e.l . Five types of site we re s ampl e d<br />

(li s ted i n p rio r ity ) : pastu res , fie lds , wa ste ar ea s, rig h ts - o f- way ,<br />

a nd ot he r sites ,s uch a s o rc h a rd s . A t ot a l of 1 4 88 s ites wer e<br />

visited with 20 m; samples taken at eac h s i t e.<br />

In Was hi n g t on c o un t s.., t he mo s t we ste r n co u nty , p l u me l e s s<br />

t h istle was t he p r ed o min ate sp ecie s i n p as tu r es an d fields . Mu sk<br />

thist le, l on g co nsidered to be the major p ro b lem spe cie s h ere , was<br />

fou nd at de nsities about 1110 those of plumeless . Ca na da th i s t le<br />

was t he least frequently detected of a l l spec ies , f ou n d at on l y 10<br />

% of s ites . Bu ll t h ist l e , wh i le de t ec t e d with in c r e as ing frequen c y<br />

from west to east in the su rvey a rea , wa s ne v er fou nd at ve ry h i g h<br />

dens i ties.<br />

In F r e d e r ic k Co u n ty, the mos t ce n t ral co u nt y , t he av era ge<br />

de nsit ies of mu s k an d p l umeles s we re low e r, bu t ap p rox i mat e ly the<br />

same for each species in pastures and fields . Howeve r, de n si ties<br />

of Canada thistle increased r elative to more weste r n Wa shin gt on<br />

Co un ty at mo s t si te t y pes . I n th is co u n ty Ca na d a thi st l e we s<br />

d etected as ofte n a s plume less t h ist l e .<br />

Carroll County contained the le ast amou nt of plumel ess an d<br />

mus k th i st l e of th e su r v e y are a, but Cana da t histle wa s f oun d mo s t<br />

f requ e nt ly i n t h is mo s t ea ste r n c o un t y.<br />

This survey indicate s t h a t musk t histle i s n o t as seve re a<br />

proble m a s plu meless th i s t l e i n Centra l Ma r ylan d . T hi s may b e<br />

ev id e nce o f the r egio na l eff e cti ven e s s o f f ede r a l and s tat e<br />

biological control efforts to red uce the populatio n o f mu sk<br />

thistle. Two beetles, Rhinocv llus ~ Froel . • and<br />

Tr i c h o s er o c:a l u s ~ ( Panz er) , a r e n o w well estab li s he d i n t h e<br />

s u r v ey a rea . Bot h sp ec i es p re fer mu sk to p l u me l e s s t hi stl e ,<br />

il lustrating the need for new b i o l o g i c a l age n ts whi c h<br />

prefere n tially attack plumeless thistle. This surv ey a l so no t ed<br />

re lat ive ly h i g h pop ulations o f Cana da t h i s tl e i n ce rtai n ar eas<br />

whi ch may c o nf i r m an e c dot a l e v i de nce th at Ca na da th i s t l e i s<br />

b e c omin g an in c r e a s i n g p r obl em i n Mary la nd .<br />

' -'; n-;o -;;o-l-o-g-i-s-t- ,- -M-a-r-;l -a-n-d- -nePt. of Agric . , An napol i s, MD 2 140 1


53<br />

AES'IRAcr<br />

BJndlben:y


54<br />

INFL UE NCE OF THE HERBIC IDE SAFENER CGA- 154281 ON GLUT AT HIONE<br />

AN D GLU TAT HIONE- S-T RANS FERA SE IN CORN<br />

C. K. Cott ingha m1 and K. K. Ha tzios 2<br />

ABSTR ACT<br />

Detoxication of chloroacetan ilide herbicid es occurs primarily by conjugat ion of the<br />

herbicide with red uced gluta thione catalyzed by glutathione-Sctransferase (G ST) .<br />

Herbi cide safeners are be lieved to confe r protec tion to crop plants by increasing GST<br />

activity andlo r glutathione levels. T his study was design ed to determin e the effect s of the<br />

safene r CGA-1542 81 [4-(dichloroacetyl)-3 ,4-dihydro-3 -me thyl-2H-l ,4-benw xazine Jon<br />

these factors in corn varieties which display differential tole rance to the herbi cide<br />

metolachlor .<br />

In a green house experimen t CGA- 154281 when for mulated with meto lach lcr<br />

(CGA -180937) wasshown [Q be effect ive in safening corn aga inst meto lachlor.<br />

Glu tathione levels were somewhat ele vated relati ve to contro l levels in com treat ed with<br />

metolachlor alone but were not affec ted when the safener was pr esen t. No diffe rences in<br />

glutathione levels were obs erved betwee n the metclac hlor tole rant variety, 'Cargill 7567'<br />

and the metolachlor sensitive variety, 'Northrup-King 9283'. Th e effects of CGA-15 4281<br />

conce ntrati on on GST activity were tested in laboratory expe riments ut ilizing a liquid<br />

culture method. For both corn hybrids treatment with 1 pM CGA- 15428 1 resulted in a<br />

30% stimulation of GST activity. A differe ntial response to safene r concen tration was<br />

observe d for the two corn varieties . Some inhibit ion of GST activity was observed for<br />

'Cargill 7567' at highe r doses of CGA -154281 while neither add itional en hancem ent nor<br />

inhibition was observed for 'North rup-King 9283'. In metabolism studies with excised<br />

apical sections of corn seedlings imbibed with 1pM CGA -154281 a similar enhanceme nt<br />

of rnetclachlor conjugat ion was observed without an incre ase in glutath ione content.<br />

Induction of GST activity was increased to twice that of controls by imbibing seed s with<br />

CGA- 180937.<br />

Th is study suppo rts the hypot hesis that the herbicide safener CGA-15 4281 acts by<br />

enhanci ng GST activity and metolachlo r me tabo lism in corn. It does not however indicate<br />

a direct effect of this safener on the glutathi one status of treated corn plants. Th at GST<br />

activity was most affect ed by the combination of herbicid e and safener suggests the<br />

part icipation of both phytochem icals in the induction mechan ism.<br />

IGr adu ate Research Asst. and 2Prof. ,Dep!. of Plant Path ology, Physiology, and <strong>Weed</strong><br />

<strong>Science</strong> , Virg inia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksbu rg, VA 24061


55<br />

EFFECT OF TEM PERATURE AND SAFENERS ON GLUTATHI ONE<br />

LEVE LS AND GLUTATHION E S-TRANSFERASE ACTIV ITY IN CORN<br />

D.L. Kunk el, J.e.Steff ens and R.R . Bel linder!<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Studies were conducted to determine the biochemical aspects of chloroacet anilide injury to<br />

com and the mechanism by whic h safeners maintain herbicide tolerance, eve n at reduced<br />

temperatures. Th e objectives of these studies were threefold: one, determin e if glutath ione<br />

(OSH) contentvariedin corn plants grown at three different temperature s in safener -treated<br />

and non-treated plants ; two. determine wheth er glutathion e S-transfe rase (OST) activ ity<br />

varied in plants grown at different temperatures ; and three , determi ne whether GST activity is<br />

sensitive to low temperatures in vitro. The herbi cide safener s CGA-1542 81 [4­<br />

(dichloroacetyJ)-3 .4-dihydro -3-methyl -2H-l .4-benzoxazin e] and dichlormid [2.2-di chloro ­<br />

N, N- di-2-propeny lacetam ide] were used with the herbicides metolach lor [2--ehloro-N-(2­<br />

ethyl-6-m ethylpheny l)-n-(2-methoxy -l -methyl)acetamide] or ecetochlo r L2-chloro-N­<br />

(ethoxymethy l)-N-2-ethy l~6 ·methylphenyl)ace tamide], respective ly, to determin e the<br />

mechani sms of com toleran ce. CGA-15428 1 significantly increased GSH levels in com<br />

seedlings grown at 27° C compared to ncn- safened seedlings. How ever, significant<br />

differences were not seen at 17 or 37° C. Dichlonnid increased aS H levels at all growing<br />

temperatures. Both CGA-15428 1 and dichlonni d increased GST activ ity significantly at all<br />

growth temperatures. The safener-induced GST activity was maintained at in vitro<br />

incubation temperatures of 5 and 15° C for acetochlor and metolachlor respectively. In<br />

contrast. GST activity from non-safened tissue was essentiall y absent at these tempera tures.<br />

There fore, greater a ST activity following safener treatment may result in higher levels of<br />

herbicide metaboli sm even at low temperatures.<br />

1 Grad. Res. Asst., Ass t. Pro f., and Assoc. Prof., Department of Fruit and Vege table<br />

<strong>Science</strong>, Corne ll University , Ithaca, New York 14853


56<br />

LIFE FORMS AND XYLEM WATER POTENTIAL<br />

OF 94 TAXA AT HEMPSTEAD PLAINS, NEW YORK<br />

Ric hard S talte r. ~"""" Dwig ht T. lGncaid, ~"""" and Eri c E. Lamo nt~ """"<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

T he flo ra of Hempstead Plains . Long Island . New Yor k, was samp le d from<br />

Ap r il 15, 1986 to Oct ober 15, 1986 with 171 vascular p lan ts i d entifi ed . The s e taxa<br />

were ar range d in a Rau n kiaer life form sp ectrum . Hemicrypto phyt es a re th e most<br />

ab undant ( 38%), wi th chamaephytes t he least ab u ndan t ( 2%) lif e form cat egory.<br />

Xylem wate r pot e ntial for 94 taxa was measured usin g a press u re chamb e r on 12<br />

middays from May 1986 throu gh May 1987 for a t otal of 1202 stems . The frequency<br />

distributi on of water potential was highly s tatistically significant fo r pos itive<br />

skewness and fo r leptokurto sis . Gen erally , there is a wide ran ge of xyle m water<br />

pote ntial fo r each life form category during each season of the year . Scar let oak<br />

(Quercus cocc inea) , a phane r ophyte and de wberry (R ubu s flagellari s) , a<br />

chama ep h yt e , d evel op ed water p ot en tials in winter as low as - 45 b ars and -58 .5<br />

bars, respectively . Cryptophyte s and hemicryptophytes had an extre mely wide<br />

ra n ge of wat er potential during spring drough t ( -40.5 t o -0.1 b ars ).<br />

INT RODUCTION<br />

Hemp s t ea d Plains , once en comp as sin g app roximate ly 24,3 00 ha , is loca t ed on<br />

Long Isla nd, New York, USA (40 deg. 44 min. N , 73 deg. 37 min . W) . On e<br />

po r ti on of the ori ginal plains bordering an abandon ed runway on the southern<br />

po r tio n of Mit ch ell Field, approximat ely a ha in siz e , is the least disturbed a rea<br />

of plain s ve geta tion . Th e ve getati on of this a ha tract was s tu di ed by Stal t er &.<br />

Lamont ::o.. ~ who identified 171 vascular plant s during the 1986 gro win g season .<br />

This study reports on th e wat er relations of life forms pre sen t in t he 8 ha<br />

t ra ct at Hempstea d Plain s (Mitc he ll Field ) . Our obj e cti v es were t o de termine t h e<br />

ranges of midday xyl em water p ot en tial and to t est for homoge ne ity among mean<br />

water po t en ti al fo r 94 tax a from five life form categories ov er all seas ons of the<br />

ye ar _ These 94 sp ecies are t he most common plants, an d they comprise about 55%<br />

of the 171 tax a id e ntif ie d b y Stal t er and "Lamont. ::0.. -. Generally , we know little<br />

ab ou t t h e compa rati v e wa te r re lation s amon g a la r ge number of p lan ts in a disc rete<br />

co mmuni t y = - ::0...2 . More over, we k no w of fe w st udies d ealing with th e water<br />

re la ti ons of life form ca te g or ies >Eo .<br />

Rau nkia er ": = classified pla nt s into fi ve major life fo rms bas ed on t h e<br />

pos iti on of th e p erenna ting bud whic h enab les th e plant t o survive d uring<br />

u nfavorable se aso n s " These major catego ries of lif e for ms are phanerophyt es,<br />

chama ep h yt es, he micryp to phytes , cryp t op hytes , an d the ro ph yt es . Pha n ero p hyt e s<br />

are woody plant s with buds ove r 250 mm above th e ground . Woody vines , tall<br />

shrubs , and t r ees fit within this cat e gory . Chama ephyt es ha ve buds exposed<br />

abo v e th e gro u nd<br />

.=:. St. John'a Uni v ers ity, J amai ca, NY 11439, U .S .A .<br />

~ Depart ment of Biologi cal Scien ces. Le hman College. City University of New<br />

Yor k , Bronx, NY 10468 , U .S.A .<br />

~"/ New York Bo ta nical Gard en, Bronx , NY 10458, U .S.A.


57<br />

bu t bel ow 250 nun ab ove t he groun d. Low s hrubs an d cus hi on p lan t s are in cluded<br />

within thi s ca tegory . Hemicrypto p hyt es have th eir bud s located at the soil 's<br />

sur fa ce . Per en nial an d bien nial her b s f all wit hin t his lif e- for m group .<br />

Cryp t op hyt es have t heir pe re nn a ting tiss u e in r hi zomes . tu bers , and bu lbs whi ch<br />

ar e loca t ed well b elo w the surface of the grou n d . Therop hytes ar e annual plants<br />

whic h survive unfav ora ble s eas ons in the form of see ds. Plan t lif e f orms and<br />

rela t ed con cep ts contin ue t o develo p and to be us ed in th e stu dy of vegetation<br />

dynami cs S, 11 .<br />

Dec iduo us leave s of drought into lerant species generally wilt when water<br />

defi cits dec line to around - 15 ba rs water potential? Everr-een leave s s how no<br />

immediat ely visi b le si gn s of water stress at -15 bars . Water po tential<br />

meas ure men ts u n d er normal conditions in t he growing season have yie lded results<br />

ra ngi ng from - 1 b ar s in aq uatic plants, to - 7 b ar s in chi ckweed ( Stellaria media) 13<br />

to - 4 to - 10 b ars in several species of Viola in New E ngland~4 b ar s in<br />

Amer ica n Holly (H ex ~)15 to - 52 bar s in spruce (Picea .J2!!!!~!!§) 13.<br />

SIT E DESCRIP TIO N<br />

Hemps t ea d Plains is situated on out was h depo si ts of th e las t Wisco n sin<br />

glacier. Two soil groups, Haven Vari ant Associatio n and Hoos ic Variant<br />

Ass ocia ti on, were identified at the study site 17 . Have n Variant so ils are deep,<br />

well -drai ne d an d mediu m textured. occ upying nearly level t o gently sloping<br />

ou twash p lai ns . Hoosic Variant soils are deep, very gravelly and well drained .<br />

Clima tically, Hempstead Plains is classified in the Coastal Division of Ne w<br />

Yor k s ta te". The ave rage ann ual temperature is 11.6 degrees C, with an average<br />

rainf all of 1 .13 m/yr . Hurricanes and summer droughts have been recorded<br />

per iodically. The average length of the growi ng season is 187 days with the<br />

shor test recorded duration be ing 158 days and the longest duration be ing 217<br />

days .<br />

VEGETATION<br />

Bro omsedge b lues tern (Andropogon vfrgtnfcus ) and lit tle blueslem (A<br />

scoparius) were the dominant pla nts at 'Hempstead Plains in 1986. Grass-leaved<br />

goldenrod (So lidago graminifolia ) is the mos t common goldenrod follo wed b y<br />

Cana di an golde nrod (.2.:.. canadensis) . As ter (Ast er pilosus) is common throughout<br />

and esp ecially con sp icu ou s when in flower . Fescue ( Fes tu ca sPP.), poverty grass<br />

(De ntho nia spica ta), or chard grass (Dactylus glomerata), Indian grass<br />

(So rgha strum nuta ns) , a long with little bluestem and broomsedge bluestem are<br />

pr es en t t he year round and demonstrate the importa nce of grasses at Hempste ad<br />

Plain s 16 . La nce - leaved vio let (V iola lan ceolat a ) , wild indigo (Baptisia tin ctorta) ,<br />

St. John 's -wo rt ( Hyp eri cu m p erforatum), Queen Anne 's lac e ( Dau cu s carota) ,<br />

Gr -een's rush ( Ju n cus greenei) , hawkeeds (Hieraciu m) spp ., and sedge (Carex<br />

p ens y lva mca ) are also common and/ or dominant in portions of this tra ct. The<br />

in vasion of alie n sp ecies, crab gra sse s (e. g. Digi ta ria ischaemum, Q..:..sanguinalis,<br />

and fox tail grass Se taria fa b erti) .on distu rb ed sit es reflec ts th e gradual change<br />

tha t is occur ri ng in the Plain s ve g et ati on 16.<br />

METHODS<br />

Th e vege tati on of an 8 ha tract of Hempst ead Plains was collected on a<br />

week ly b asi s b egi n nin g on April 12, 1986, t ermina ting on Oct ob er 15, 1986 . A


58<br />

of Gleason &. Cro nquist ....... Baile y "' was used to identify cultivated spe cies. Th e<br />

specie s were arranged in a Ra u nki er life form. spectrum . Pro porti ons of spe ci es<br />

in ea ch of the five lif e forms were cal culat ed (T abl e 1).<br />

Lea v es and t wi gs of 94 spe cie s re p resen te d by 50 or more plants in a 8 ha<br />

trac t at Hemp stea d Plain s were har vested durin g 12 samp le p eriods beginning May<br />

30. 1986 ter minating May 1. 1987 . Leaves and t wigs we re ex cis ed near midday and<br />

xyle m water potential was meas ured with two cross-cal ib rate d Sch olander type<br />

pressure chambe rs, one reading to - 40 bars and th e othe r to - 100 bars<br />

(Soilmoisture Corp ., Santa Bar bara, CAl . We were ab le to make large numbers<br />

of measu r emen ts within several hours by usin g tw o cham b ers and three<br />

in ves tiga tors.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Hemicr-yp tophyte s , the largest life form category , comprise 38 perce nt of th e<br />

plains fl ora . Chamaephytes are least represente d (Table 1).<br />

Water p ot en tials for phan ero ph yt es and chamaeph ytes are lowest in winter<br />

whil e the p r otected h emicrypto p hyt es and cryp tophytes are highe st (least wa ter<br />

stres se d) in win ter. Gene rally , th ero ph yt es are th e least wate r s t re s s ed of all life<br />

form spectra thoug h som e the rophytes e. g. Deptford pink (Dia nthus armeria) , may<br />

de ve lop wat er po ten tials as low as - 49 bars when in flower or in frui t . T he re is<br />

a gre at deal of va ria bili ty of wat er pot ential within ea ch life form catego ry fo r each<br />

da te , in ea ch se aso n (Table 3). An exce pti on to this generalizatio n is th e fact<br />

th at water potentials were no t measured for the ro p hytes in win te r . Gen erall y , th e<br />

fre que ncy dis tributions we re hig hl y statis tically signifi can t for sk ewness and for<br />

lepto ku r tos is for each life for m ca tego ry for each season (Tab le 3). This tendency<br />

toward skewness and kurtosis held true in winte r under blizzar d co ndi tio ns (se e<br />

22 Ja nu ary 1987 in Ta bl e 3).<br />

Water p ot en tial s for all lif e form spe ctra were lowes t (Le . un der th e gre atest<br />

amou nt of water s tre s s ) in win ter and high es t during late July , earl y Sep tember<br />

an d ea rly Octo ber. 1986 . Chamaephytes expe ri en ce d greate s t wa ter stre s s,<br />

esp eciall y in winte r whe n dewberry (R ubus flagellaris) develope d a mean wate r<br />

po te ntial of - 58 bars. The plain s species tes te d in five life for m ca tegories<br />

deve loped s ignif ica n tl y diff er en t wat er potentials during the yearly te st pe ri od ;<br />

extre mes were greatest fo r cha maep hyt ea ,<br />

T he freq uency dis tri bu ti on was highly s ta tis ti call y significant (P < . Ol ) for<br />

nega tiv e ske wness an d for lep to ku rtosis for the entire data se t (gl =: 1. 9; g= ­<br />

7.6 ;). as well as on 7 of th e 12 sample days and for the dif fe ren t lif e fo rms .<br />

Relative to nor mal p rob ab ilit y distri butio ns, our samples had mor e extre mely low<br />

wat er p ot en tial values, an d had more val ues clumped arou n d th e mean . Wat er<br />

p otentials were highest in th e fall an d were lowes t in the win ter (Ta b les 2 & 3).<br />

Th e means for th e s eas ons were heteroge neou s (singl e clas sification ANOV'A, F =:<br />

11. 2 n. , df 3, 1198); ove r all se aso ns , th e means for the five life fo rms were<br />

h eterogeneous (single clas sifica ti on ANOVA, F =:12 .2 ... , df 4.119 7); an d within<br />

eac h season , the means for the life forms were he terogeneous (P < . 01 in all cases;<br />

Tabl e 3) .<br />

Durin g th e growin g seas on . mean wate r po tentials for all speci es va ried from<br />

- 17 to - 9 . 3 bars (Tab le 3). Plains sp ecies d evelop si gnif ica n tl y different wa ter<br />

potentials during any t est period (Table 2).<br />

Th er e are few phanerophytes and chamaephyt es at Hempste ad Plains . Most<br />

plains species (hemicryptophyt es, therophyt es and cryptopbytes) have their<br />

perenn ating ti s s u e prote cted during th e unfavorable part of the growing seas on .<br />

Stra t egies s uc h as un der gro u nd p ro tecti on of meris tematic tissue linke d to<br />

varia ti ons in th e seas on alit y of gro wth , an d combine d with dif ferential wate r


59<br />

re la tio ns , may assis t in the extra ctio n of soil wat er and all ow surviv al and growth<br />

during drought indu ced water stre ss . The pre se nce of th e p re dominantly<br />

herbaceous vege ta ti on at Hempstead Plains may in volv e wat er re la ti ons as well as<br />

life his t ory strategy. and s tage in succession .<br />

Tabl e 1. Freq ue n cies of specie s in Raunkia er Life Forms for Hemp s tead Plains,<br />

Long Is land N.Y. (171 species ).<br />

Freq uen cy<br />

Numbe r of (Per cent )<br />

Sit e Speci es Ph Ch H Cr Th<br />

Hempst ead Plain s 171 26 66 34 42<br />

Lon g Island, NY (15%) ( 2) (3 8) (2 0) (2 5)<br />

LIT ERATURE CITE D<br />

1. B~YJ L .K. 1949. Manu al of Culti va te d Plants . MacMillan, New York .<br />

2. Chabot , B .F. and Mooney , H.R. 1985. Physio logical Ecology of North<br />

American Plant Communiti es. Chapman &: Hall, New Yor k .<br />

3. Cu r tis J W.F. and Kin caid. D. T . 1984. Leaf con d u ctance r espo ns es of Viola<br />

species from s u n and shad e habitats . Cana dia n J ournal of Botan y . 6 2 :1268~<br />

4 . Gleason , H.A . and Cronquist , A. 1963. Manual of Vascular Pla n t s of<br />

Nor th ea st ern United Stat es and Ad jac en t Canada . Willard Gra n t Pres s , Bosto n,<br />

MA.<br />

5. Hobbs, R .J., Mallik, A .U . and Gimin gham, C.H . 1984. Stu di es on fir e in<br />

Sco tti sh HeathJan d communi ties III. Vital a ttr ib ut es of the speci es . Jo ur nal of<br />

Ecology. 72:963 -976 .<br />

6. Kin cai d . D . T., and Lyo ns , E.E . 1981. Winter water relatio ns of red spruce<br />

on Moun t Monadn ock , New Hampshire. Ecology 62 : 1155 -11 61.<br />

7 . Kramer , P. J. and Kozlowski , T. T . 1979. Ph y siology of Woody Plant s .<br />

Academic Pres s, In c . , N .Y .<br />

8. Lar che r, W. 1980. Physio logical p lant eco logy , 2nd ed . Sp rin ger - Ver la g ,<br />

NY.<br />

9. Pa ck, A. B. 1972. Climate of New Yor k . United State s Depa r t men t of<br />

Commerce . Nati onal Oceani c &: Atmosph eri c Admini stration, Enviro nme n tal Data<br />

Ser vi ce. Silver Spring, MD.<br />

10. Raunkia er, C. 1934 . The Lif e -F orms of Pla n ts an d Statistical Plan t<br />

Geography . Oxf ord Uni ver sity Pres s , London .<br />

11. Rea der , R.J., Mallik , A .D . , Hobbs , R .J. and Gimin gham , C. H . 1983 .<br />

Shoot regeneration af te r fire or fr eezing t empera tures and it s relation to plan t life<br />

form for some heathland species. Vege tatio . 55 :181 -189.


60<br />

12. Sala , O.E . • Lauenroth , W.K. and Reid , C.P .P . 1982 . Water rela ti ons : A<br />

new dimension for niche separation betwee n Bauteloua gracilis an d~<br />

smit hii in North American se mi-arid grasslands . Journ al of Appli ed Ecology.<br />

19 ,6 47-657.<br />

13 . Salis bury . F.B .• and Ross , C.W. 1978 . Plan t Phys iology, 2nd ed ,<br />

Wadsw orth , Belmon t , CA.<br />

14. Sakal, R .R . , and Rohlf. F.J . 1981. Biometry, 2nd e d, W. H. Freeman &<br />

Co., San Francisco.<br />

15 . Stalte r I R. , and Kincaid , D . T • 1985. llex opa ca on Fire Is land - Water<br />

Relations in Winter at The Sunken Fore st . Holly <strong>Society</strong> Journa l. 4:1 -12 .<br />

16. Stal ter, R . and Lamont , E. 1987 . The vegetation of Hemps tea d Plains ,<br />

Mitchell Fie ld , New York. Bulletin of th e Torrey Botanical Club. 114:33 0- 335 . '<br />

17 . United States Soil Conservation Service. 1976 . Gene ral soil map and<br />

int erpretation, 1976 . E. P .A . Grant 1002103010 . 51 p., 1 map .<br />

Table 2. Dat es, sampl e sizes, and means for xy lem water po te ntial meas ure d at<br />

Hemps tead Plain s.<br />

DAT E NO . NO . MEAN SD<br />

SPEClE S SAlIIPLES ( -bars)<br />

30 May 30 1986 25 92 -15 .3 7 . 26<br />

9 Jun e 1986 40 181 - 10 .4 3.9 7<br />

27 June 1986 37 89 -17 . 0 8 .55<br />

22 Jul y 1986 45 0·0132 -12 .5 4.99<br />

Skew Kurtosis<br />

+ ••<br />

NS +.<br />

+ ••<br />

+. NS<br />

29 Ju ly 1986 54 149 - 9 .3 4 .22<br />

2 September 1986 53 138 - 7 .9 3. 78<br />

3 Octo ber 1986 46 120 - 7 .9 4.12<br />

14 Nove mbe r 1986 20 56 - 13. 8 7.90<br />

11 Dec embe r 1986 19 54 - 8.3 5 . 91<br />

22 January 1987 10 28 - 24 .3 12 . 01<br />

6 March 1987 13 38 - 15 . 1 9.79<br />

NS<br />

NS<br />

N5<br />

NS<br />

+ ••<br />

+ ..<br />

+ ••<br />

+ ••<br />

+ ••<br />

1 May 1987 40 125 - 9.2 9.16<br />

+... NS<br />

+ ..


61<br />

Table 3 . Midday xylem water potentials for Raunkiaer life forms. Hempstead Plains. New<br />

York .<br />

A. Means in Xy lem Wate r Pote ntial<br />

LI FE FOR M SPRING SUMMER FALL WINTER OVERALL<br />

Phan erop hytes<br />

- 10. 1 - 13 . 1 - 11. 9 - 15 . 8 - 12. 7<br />

n =305<br />

CV 53\<br />

Chamaephytes<br />

-11 .3 -10. 7 - 0.9 - 20 . 1 -14 .2<br />

n = 33<br />

CV 107%<br />

Hemicryptop hytes<br />

-12 .4 -11 .4 -9.3 - 6 . 9 -11.5<br />

n = 350<br />

CV 50. 3\<br />

Cryp t op hytes<br />

-10 .5 - 10 .4 - 10 . 1 -6. 2 - 10.2<br />

n = 414<br />

CV 59.2%<br />

T he rop hytes<br />

- 9. 2 - 9 . 5 - 6. 2 absent - 8. 6<br />

n = 100<br />

cv 66. 8\<br />

Means<br />

CV (\)<br />

N<br />

- 11 .0<br />

49%<br />

423<br />

- 11 .1<br />

56. 2%<br />

502<br />

- 9. 7<br />

63.5%<br />

157<br />

- 14. 2<br />

76 . 7\<br />

120<br />

GRAND TO TAL<br />

Gra nd Mean -11. 2 bars<br />

CV = 59.5 %<br />

n = 1202<br />

B . ~B in Xylem Wate r Potential<br />

LIFE FORM SPRING SUl\1MER . FALL WINTER<br />

Pha n erophytes<br />

-19 to - 1 - 22. 5 to- 1 -4 5 . to - 4 -39 to -3<br />

Chama ep h yt es<br />

-14.3 to -8 - 20 to -4.5 - 1 to - 0 . 8 - 58 . 5 to 1.5<br />

Hemicryp top hyt es<br />

-40.5 to -0 .5 -40 to-l - 18 to-1 -10 to - 3. 5<br />

Cryptophyte s<br />

-34 to - 0 . 1 - 40 to -1 - 26 . 5 to- 1. 5 - 14 t o -2<br />

Therop hytes<br />

- 11. 2 to - 7 . 5 -4.9 to - 0 . 6 -12 to -1 abs en t


62<br />

TIMI NG OF OUST APPLICATION AFFECTS SURVI VAL OF HARDWOODREGENERATI ON:<br />

NORnl WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA<br />

Stephen B. HO rSl ey~<br />

Larry H. McCo1'1lick<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Dense ground covers of' hayscented (Dennstaedtia punct ilo bul a (Michx . )<br />

Moore) an d New York (Thelypt eris novebor-ecenad a L.) fern , pe r ennial g rasses ,<br />

and sed ge s (Car ex sp p . ) int erfere with establish ment of ad vance r egenera tio n of<br />

blac k ch er r y(Pru nu s serot me Ehr h .) and r ed mapl e (Acer ru b ru m L.) i n t he<br />

Alle gheny hardwood forest of nor t hwest ern Pennsy lvania:---oUS t her b i ci de<br />

(s ul f ome t uro n methyl) cont rol s hayscented and New York fern and reduces the<br />

amount of gr a s s and sedg e o rigi na t i ng in t he f ore st fl oor seed bank when<br />

ap pli ed at t he rat e of 2 o z of produ c t / a cre between e arly J u l y and early<br />

Octo be r . Measurement s made in fo rmal studies an d obse rvat i on s mad e in<br />

comme rc ial opera tio ns su g ge s t t h a t ha rd wood species may diffe r in se ns i t ivity<br />

to Oust . I n 19 89. we initi a t ed a small pl ot e xper ime nt to de te r'lline the effect s<br />

o f timing of Ous t ap plic a ti on . su r f a ctant add itio n . an d se ed l i ng size on black<br />

ch e r ry and r ed mapl e s eed li ngs of s eve eef sizes . A si mi l ar expe r-rcnen t , whi ch is<br />

r-epo r -te d sep ar-a t.ek y , was c ondu c t ed i n ce ne s-ef Pe nnsy l van i a .<br />

Oust was applied with o r wit h out surfactan t (0 . 5% Va l an t X-77 Spr'ea der-] at<br />

the r ate of 2 oz o f produc t /a cre in earl y July, early August. early September,<br />

and e ar-Ly Octob er to t h r e e si ze catagories (new get"minants ,


63<br />

TIMING OF OUST APP LICATI ON AFFECT S SUR VIVAL<br />

OF HARDWOO D REGENERATION:<br />

CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA<br />

Larry H . McCormick I<br />

Step hen B. Horsley2<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Regenerati on of hard wcxxis in central Penn sylvania is often impeded by den se<br />

gro und covers of ferns and perennial grasses which invade fores t sites followin g harvest<br />

cuts. Oust herbicide (sulforneturon methy l), which effectively control s ferns and grasses.<br />

has been used operational ly in forest management in Pennsylvania since 1987. Report s on<br />

theeffects of Oust on seedlings of desired hardwood species present at the time of<br />

herbicide applications are conflicting. In someinstances, OUSIhas not producedany<br />

detrimental effects on de sired tree seedling s while in other instances Ous t has caused<br />

seedling mortali ty or severe stunting . These confl icting results may be due to difference s in<br />

species sensitivity to Oust, the time of Oust application, presence of a surfactant in the<br />

spray mix, or size/age of the seed lings. These factors were eval uated by a set of similar<br />

experiments conducted in north western and central Pennsylvania. Thi s abstrac t reports on<br />

the rese arch condu cted in central Pennsy lvania; the northwes tern Penn sylvania work is<br />

reponed separate ly.<br />

Oust was applied with or without surfactant (0.5% Valant X-77 Spre ader ) at the<br />

rate of 2 oz of prod uct/acre in early July, early Augu st, early September , and early Octobe r<br />

to three size categ ories (new germinant s, < 1', 1-3') of red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and<br />

two size catego ries (new germi nants. 1-31 of white ash (Fraxinns ameri cana L. ) to<br />

evaluate the tolerance of these species to Oust Survival and damage of treated seedl ings<br />

were compared with a no herbicide control one year after treatment, Similar measurement s<br />

were taken on northern red oak. (Quercu s Dlbra L.) and black oak. (Quercus yelutina Lam. )<br />

seedlings present in the red map le and white ash plots, although there were not eno ugh for<br />

statistical testing.<br />

Red maple showed little sensitivity to Oust irrespective of the month of application<br />

or the prese nce of surfactan t Surviva l of red maple seedlings was high (>85%) for all<br />

three size categories of treated seedling s. White ash was more sens itive to OUSt White ash<br />

mortality was high with applications made from early July through early September. Early<br />

October applic ation of Oust resulted in lower monalit y of white ash. Addition of surfacta nt<br />

to Oust significantly increased dama ge and mortality of white ash. New genninants of<br />

white ash appearedto be more sensitive to Oust than older, large r seedlings. Northern red<br />

oak and black oak were not sen sitive to application of Oust alone. Survival was less when<br />

Oust + Surfactant was applied, particular ly with earl y July applications. The se results<br />

suggest that sites containing white ash rege neration should rece ive late summer or ear ly fall<br />

applications of Oust witho ut surfactant<br />

I Associate Professor, Schoo l of Fores t Reso urces, The Penn sylva nia State Unive rsity,<br />

University Park, PA 16802.<br />

2 Plant Physiologis t, USDA Fore st Service, Northeastern Forest Expe rime nt Station ,<br />

Warren, PA 16365.


64<br />

CONTROLOF HAYSCEN1ED FERN SPOREEMERGENCEWITH<br />

SULFOMETURON<br />

John W. Groning er and Larry H. McCormick l<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Partially cut hardwood stands in Pennsylvan ia frequently develop a hayscented fern<br />

IDenn sraedtia punctilobu!a (Michx.) Moore] dom inated understory. Fern inte rference and<br />

overbrows lng by deer prevents the establishment of desirable hardwood seedlings<br />

frequently leading to regeneration failures. Previously fern free areas can be colonized by<br />

wind dispers ed spores Ferns developing from spores produce a perennial rhizome during<br />

their first year and can become sexually mature in three years. Ferns developing from<br />

spores have been observed in recently partially cut central Pennsylvania oak stands.<br />

Preventing the devel opm ent of these individuals can be crucia l in maintaining a stand's<br />

regeneration potential. Sulfometuron is currently used to control hayscented ferns when<br />

applied to fronds and unfoliated rhizomes. Its ability to control spore emergence is<br />

unknown.<br />

A greenho use study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of varying rates<br />

of sulfometuron in controlli ng hayscented fern spore emergence. Sulfometuron was tested<br />

at rates of .025, .05, .1 and .21 kg ai/ha plus an untreated control. The herbicide<br />

treatments were applied to mineral soil samples prior to inoculation with hayscented fern<br />

spores collected from fertile fronds. Inoculated soil samples were placed under a 55%<br />

plastic mesh shade cloth and spore emergence status was evaluated after 52 days.<br />

Sulfometuron effectively controlled hayscented fern spore emergence at all rates<br />

rested. Abundant prothalli (the second observable stage of fern emergence) were present in<br />

all untreated controls.<br />

IGraduate Research Assistant and Associate Professor respectively,<br />

School of Forest Resources, The Pennsylvania State University, Univer sity Park, PA<br />

16802


65<br />

ELECTRI CAL CONDUCT IVIT Y OF TWO GLyP HOSATE-C ONTAI Nf NG HERBI CID ES<br />

AT F I VE CONCE NT RATIO NS .<br />

R . A . l_d ut e n sc h l ag er an d G. R i cha rd Sc h ae rtl . Co l l e g e of Fore s t<br />

Resources, Unive rsit y o f Ma i ne . Or ono, ME 0 4 4 6 9 .~<br />

ABSTRACT: r-tee e .ur t nq co ndu ct ivity o f spr a y e o l u t r o r-s o f em i ne<br />

h er bi cid es h e lp s ass u re prope r mi xi ng pri o r to a p ol l Ca t l o n t hus<br />

p r o vi d i ng ad d Iti o nal q u alit y c o ntr o l t o op er ation a l h erb I c I d e<br />

p r o gr a ms . E le c trica l con d u c tiv ity was d et e rmi ned f or $e Ve n<br />

c o n ce nt rati o ns (0 - 15 % v :v) o f Accor d R a n d Ac co r d R CR h e r bi =id e s<br />

i n aqu eo us s olu tion with t h ree concen tr ations ( 0 - 1% v : v) o f<br />

eit he r Cide - Kick I I ~ m o r Or-th o X-77 Spr e aderH 5urfact ants .<br />

Co n dcc t t v i t v ( f.JS cm · -~) of th es e solution s, o e t e r-m i n e -d at f i v e<br />

sol utio n t emp e ra tur es (5 - 25 ""C > inc reas ed 73 7 . 7 j.lS c m- l and<br />

16 4 . 9 ~S cm I for ea c h 1'l. in cre ase in h e r b i C l d e co nc e n tr a tio n a n d<br />

ee cb ! "·C lnc r e e s e i n t e mp e r a t ur e . Con d u ct i V1 ty d e cr e a s ed 21 2 .3<br />

u S e m ,-l fo r each 1% inc rea s e in su r fa ctan t c on c e n trat1 0 n . Th e<br />

c o nd u c t i v i ty o f Ac c o r d CR was 100 . 5 ~ S em ' gr e a t er t na n Ac c cl - d :<br />

c o nducti vi t y of Ci de - Kic k 11 was 82 .3 ~ S e m ·' g ,·e a t e r than X- 7 7 .<br />

Re su l t s o f th is s tu d y wi ll a p pear in t h e South e r n J o u r na l o f<br />

Applie d F ores tr y in 1991 . Th e e q u a t 10 n s p re sente d WIll e na b l e<br />

fore st ers t o v er i f y proper co nc en tr a t I on an d mI r i n g o f th es e<br />

h e r bicid e a n d s u r f actant so luti o n s fo r te mpe ~a t u , es Ilk@l y t c<br />

occ u r in the f i el d if wa te r source c o nd u c t iV Ity i s ~ 31)0 u S C"<br />

'- Th e e o t nor e than k .Lo t- m Br v eo t • Oe vi o 00\\1 , An t n on v O:l la u l 0 ,<br />

WIll i am Ha l t e ma n , eo d Ma )Cwell rtc Co r-me c c J r . f o r c r r v t c e t r e v r e we<br />

of this meo o ec r r o t ; t h e u ru v e r e r e v of rte r o e t e C c c o e r e e r v e<br />

F o re s t r y Resear ch Uni t f or labo rato r y f aci l Ities ; a n d th e<br />

etc n e eo t c Agr i cui tura 1 Com p an y f or f u ndi ng.


66<br />

P'IRS'r -'l£AR RESPONSE OF NORTIlBRH HIDD CONIFE R STANDS<br />

'1'0 RELEASE APP LICATIONS OF l MAZAPYR AND COMBIN AT IO NS<br />

D. r • Maa •• l<br />

Tr ea t me nts of lo w r at e s ima zllpy r alone a nd ta nk mi xe s wi t n II. surfactant.<br />

g l yp ho s &t e and t r l c l op yr r ed uced broa d l a a! stems f rom 72' t o 96 ' . whi le tre at ­<br />

ments wit h gl yp ho sa .te and t r ic lopyr al o ne r ed uc ed stem number s by 63 \ and 64\<br />

i n this s t udy o f a ppl i c at i on ll t o ill ten ye ar o l d fo r e s ted cl eareut in Hain e .<br />

Fi r and spr u ce he i ght g r owt h r a tes were 0.1 to 0 .2 fe e t in the first year with<br />

ap plica t i ons o f ima z apy r . Fir biomass grew i n t he glyphosate and imazapy r<br />

tre at me nts g re w bett e r th an th e co nt ro l .<br />

Int rodupti o n<br />

Ima zapy r {(±1 -2 - {4 , S-d i hydr o- 4-m e thyl-4 - (l - methy l ethyl) ­<br />

S- ox o-l H- im i d a zol- 2-y l }- 3- pyri di necar bo c yli c a ci d }2 ha s be en u se d in Main e on<br />

19 di ffer ent s it e s in 15 diff e r ent treatme nts b e t wee n the yea r s 198 5 t o 1988.<br />

Tr i als wer e e stablis hed t o de t ermin e eff i cacy and i njury l e vel at d i ff eren t<br />

ra t es and a s ta nk mixes for r e lease of nort her n coni f ers , si t e pr epar ation and<br />

r o adsi de br u sh c on t ro l. For r eleas e, lo wer r at es hav e r e duc e d injury, bu t<br />

ha v e low ered e f fica c y on s ome spe cies.<br />

Th i s series of t r e a t ment s was established to examin e dif f e renc e s in ef fi ­<br />

cacy and co nife r injury at varying low r ates o f i..mazapy r a pplied a lone , wi th a<br />

sur f a c tan t 3 lind as a t a nk mix wi t h g l yp hos llt e {N- {ph o s ph o nOllleth yl} gl ycinel 4,<br />

an d tric lopyr (I (3,5 , 6- tri ch lor o- 2-py ridinyl )ox y ) ac e tic acid) 5. These<br />

tria ls we r e de s i gned t o mini mize c o st a nd environment a l inp ut of p roducts .<br />

The t r eatm ents (Tab le 1) wer e a pp lie d to a fo r es ted cl e arcut ab out t en<br />

years af t e r har ve s t ne a r Endles s Lak e i n T3R9NWP a bout 45 mi les nor th o f<br />

Bango r. Th ey wer e a pplied a e r i a l l y on Se ptemb e r 5 a nd 6th , 1989 during ev e ­<br />

ning se8sionll usi ng RD- S·s no z zles o n a Bell 4 7 Hel i c opt er . The tr iclo p yr<br />

tre a tments were applied a t 8 gallons per acre. All the othe rs wer e a pp l i ed a t<br />

5 gallons per acre . All t r e at ment s were a pp l ied to live acre blocks wi t hou t<br />

r e p l ic a t i o n.<br />

The t r eatm ents f or ea c h b lock were s elect ed ran doml y . Beca use the blocks<br />

were not t r e a t ed consecutively , care was take n to assure trea tmen t s were<br />

a pp li e d a s planned .<br />

The ba s i s f or comp aris on of treat ments will be ch ang e s in b road leaf<br />

spec i es a nd growth o f co ni fe r s wit hi n ea c h t r e at ment. To ex ami ne th ese<br />

cha nges , s ixte e n sam ple points wer e es t a bl i sh ed i n e a c h blo ck c o nsi sting of a<br />

mil ac re plot and a 1/1501'. plot . These we re dis t rib uted on a gri d pa t ter n<br />

throughou t the treatment area. The perm anent pl ot cen te rs were e stabli s hed<br />

be f or e a ny d ata was coll ected . Each pl ot c e nt e r was lab elle d wi t h b l ock an d<br />

p l ot nu mber.<br />

1 Associat e , Th e Irland Gr oup , August a, Haine<br />

2 Ar senal Applicators Concentrate €)<br />

3 Ci d e Kic k II ®<br />

4 Roundup@<br />

5 Ga rlo n 4 €, l


67<br />

l mazapyr<br />

...Alone<br />

I ma z a p yr '01/<br />

Surfa c t a nt<br />

L..2ll...l1LY<br />

'rabl e 1. Tr. at •• n t li st :<br />

ounc e s of iJla wapy r prod uc t per acr e<br />

I maza pyr '01<br />

Gl yp ho s ate<br />

--LLll11AL<br />

I ma z a p yr '01<br />

Glyphosa t e<br />

~<br />

I ma z a pyr wI<br />

Tr i c l o p yr<br />

tl 5 I b /A I<br />

Glyph os at e pr od u c t a l o ne @ 2 Ibs / A<br />

Triclop y r pr odu c t a lo ne @ 2 l b e tA c o nt r o l<br />

Unt rea ted co ntr o l<br />

The mi laer e pl ot wil l be us ed to monit or c ha n ge s in br oa d l e a f spe c i e s<br />

su r vi va l a n d he ight by exami n i ng c ha nge s s t e m c o u nt of ea c h spe c i es pr e s en t<br />

and a n es timat e of he ight . The larg e r co nce nt r i c plo t wi l l b e u s ed t o measu re<br />

c ha nge s in surv i v al and g r owt h of th e r el e a s e d con i fe r s . I t was div i ded in to<br />

four quadrats ba s e d o n or d i n a l direc tions . This i s e qu iv a l e nt to a 1/ 600 A<br />

plo t . The d omi n a nt in di vi d ua l o f eac h conif er present i n e a c h qu ad r at was<br />

mar ked a nd he ight a nd d i ame ter at 6 i nche s wa s mea s u r ed . The p l o t a we r e will<br />

be measu red for t wo g r owin g season s foll o wing t re a t me n t s . Th i s p a per r epo r t s<br />

on the f i r s t g r owi ng s e a s o n follow ing trea tment measure d in Ju ne , 1990 a t t he<br />

e nd o f t he h ei g ht e xp an s i on fo r t he ye ar .<br />

From g ene ra l obse rva tion , the trea tment s appear ed to be s u ccessful .<br />

The r e . seeme d to be unifo rm a pp l i cati o n throughout e a c h bloc k and across t he<br />

tr eatm en t a rea .<br />

Al l t rea t men t s h ad acc eptabl e levels of cont rol . While the control<br />

inc r e as ed th e numbe r of h a r dwood s t ems per plot by 15" , the chem ical tr eat ­<br />

men t s r e du ced ha rdwood stems fr om 63 \ t o 96\ (Table 2 ) . The glyphosa te a nd<br />

t ri clo pyr a l on e t r e a t ment s reduc ed har dwood stems a t 63\ a nd 64\, wh i l e<br />

t rea t men t s wit h i ma za py r reduc ed s t e ms by a t least 11'l . Gen e rally stem re d u c ­<br />

t i o n increase d wi t h i n cr e a sed amou nt of i mazapy r a p p l ie d, but i ma za pyr at six<br />

ounce s was margi n a l ly b et t e r tha n ima zap yr at two o r f o u r ou nces . I ma z a p y r<br />

a lon e at si x o un c es r e d u ced the nu mber o f stems pe r plot by 87\ i n th e fi rst<br />

yea r . Th e imazapyr and s urfac ta nt co mbinat i o n re du ced s tem s by 73\ to 80 \ ,<br />

while combina tions with g l yp ho s a t e r e du c e d st ems fro m 8 2\ t o 9 0\ . Combi na ­<br />

t i on s with t ri c lo p yr r e d u c e d s t e ms f r om 7 1\ t o 96\ .<br />

Tabl e 2 . Percent Lo ss in Ha r d wood Stem s<br />

No I ma z a py r Imaza p yr I ma zap y r<br />

1IllJWlJ>U .L'--.o.L. lL.Lo.L. L.O....=..<br />

No o t he r produc ts - 14 . 8 87.1<br />

Sur f ac t ant @ .2 5\ vl v 12 .8 80 .4 79 .9<br />

Glyp ho s a te @ 1 lb. 86 .0 82. 4 82.5<br />

Glypho s at e @ 1 1 {2 Ibs . 84 .7 93 .3 89 .6<br />

Gl ypho s a t e @ 2 lbs. 62.8<br />

Tricl o pyr @ 1 1 /2 lbs. 11.7 70. 7 95 .7<br />

Triclo p yr @ 2 lbs. 63 . 8


68<br />

Cherry ( PnmuB pensylyanica L.) and ae pen l~ Bpp. L.) we r e the<br />

e •• i est to c o nt r o l lind all t reatments were s uc c e s s f u l with t hese s pecie s.<br />

There WllS s ome va riation in red map l e (~ ruburm L. ) stem r edu ction wi t h th e<br />

g l ypho s ll.t e alo ne trea tme nt havin g t he sma ll e st r ed ucti on a t 16\ a nd i ma:z:apyr<br />

a nd surfa ctant hav i ng t he l arg e s t r edu cti on of 94\ an d 9 5\. Ho o se maple (~<br />

pe ns y l Vllni c um L.) was als o r e l a t iv e l y ea si l y c ont rolled for most treatm ents,<br />

wit h re du c t i on s bette r than 82' . Glyph os llte a lo ne and tr lc! opyr a l o ne h ad<br />

reduc tions of moose maple of 26\ a nd 40\ respectively .<br />

There wa s more v ariation in control of beech (~ g randifoli a Ehr.) .<br />

Reductions i n per cent of stems per plot varied from 35\ fo r tr l c l op yr a lo ne<br />

to 95\ for lm azapyr at 4 oun ces in combination with gl yp ho sa t e . I ma zapy r an d<br />

s u rfac t a nt combi nati on resu l ted in a l owe r r eductio n than ot he r co mbinat io ns.<br />

Gr owt h of spruc e (f..i..m spp. A. Di e t r. ) a nd fir (illll ~ (L. )<br />

Mil l.) is i nhibited by imllzap yr at ra tes exceeding 4 ounce s pe r a c r e<br />

(Sc haertl, 19 91 ) . We would e xpe c t to see less growth occur ring at h i g her<br />

r a te s of imazapyr than at low rates. This generally the case (Tabl e s 3 an d<br />

4) . I n the control, f i r grew 0 .5 feet and s pruce grew 0.3 feet. Mo s t of<br />

th es e tr e e s are und e r stress due to compet i tio n . I n the glyphosat e trea tm ent ,<br />

fi r grew a t a modest r ate of 0. 1 feet and sp ru ce 0.5 feat , whi le in t he<br />

t r i c l opy r a lon e t rea t ment , fir grew 0 .5 a nd s pr uce gr e w 0 . 4 fe e t. Wit h the<br />

ex c e pt io n o f on e treatm ent, fi r an d spruc e grew between 0 . 1 and 0.2 feet for<br />

the fir s t gr owi ng se a son af t e r trea t ment in th e block s t r e ated with combina ­<br />

tions with imazapyr. The comb ination s of t r iclopy r a nd ima za.py r had v ery<br />

modes t growth on s pruce and fir and seemed to be most in hi b ited . In j ur y rat e s<br />

were highest amongst these t reatlllents. The negative growth of the s pr u ce i n<br />

the triclopyr and imazapyr at 6 ounces is du e to IlIOrtality due to ins e ct a an d<br />

litt l e positive g rowth on other trees. Only in the treatment of th e combi na ­<br />

tio n o f imaz apyr at 2 ou nces and glyphoaate at 1 lb . did fir growt h compa r e t o<br />

t ha t of the control .<br />

Table 3 . Fir Growth i n Fe et<br />

No IlIIazapyr Imazapyr I maza py r<br />

Imm JL'--.oL. ~ ~<br />

No other p r od uc t s 0 . 5 0. 1<br />

Su r f a c t an t . 25' vjv 0.1 0 . 1 0. 0<br />

Gly ph o sa.te •@ 1 lb. 0 .5 0 .0 0.1<br />

Gly p ho sat e @ 1 1/ 2 l b e. 0.2 0.2 0 .1<br />

Glyphoeat e @ 2 Lbe , 0 . 1<br />

Triclopyr @ 1 1 /2 Ibs. 0 .1 0. 1 0. 0<br />

Triclopyr @ 2 Ibs . 0 .5<br />

Table 11. Spruce Growth in Fe et<br />

No IlIIazapy r lmazap y r I maz a pyr<br />

Imm JL'--.oL. e...L=,. LJi....l>L.<br />

No other produc ts 0.3 0 .1<br />

Su r f a c t a nt @ . 2 5' vjv 0 .2 0 .2 0. 1<br />

Gly ph o s ate @ 1 lb . 0.2 0. 2 0.2<br />

Gl yph o sate @ 1 1/2 Ibs . 0.2 0 .2 0 .2<br />

Glyp hosa te @ 2 Ib e . 0. 5<br />

Tr i c l o pyr @ 1 1/2 Ibs . 0.1 0 .0 - 0 . 2<br />

Tr i c l o pyr @ 2 Lb e , 0.4


69<br />

I maz apyr i n j ury on s pr uc e a nd fir con s is t s o f no o r lit tl e bud bre ak or<br />

s mall nee dles or both i n t he gr owing s e a s on f o l l owi ng application . Some burn ­<br />

ing of t he need lea also o c cur s. Obs er va t i on s from prior ap p lications indi c at e<br />

tha t t he t rees r e c ove r afte r tw o o r thre e gr owi ng seasons . White pine (Pinu s<br />

~ L .) wer e not AS s u s ce pt i b l e to injury at these rates ee t he spruceand<br />

fir.<br />

Estimates of biomass wer e c alc ulated usi ng diameter squared times height .<br />

Flrst year firm a nd spruc e b iomass growt h are shown in Tables 5 and 6. These<br />

ellttlmate8 demon lit rate t he impo rta nce of diameter growth. Those treatmen ts in<br />

which diameter did not g row very much also had poor biomass growth . It is<br />

appa rent , that we should not re l y solely on height growth as measures of<br />

response.<br />

Fir in all the t reatments grew as well as or better than the fir in the<br />

control. However, spr uce in th e cont ro l grew better than the spruce in all<br />

but two of the treatments. The be s t fir and spruce growth occurred in t he<br />

glyphoaate and imll.z;ll.pyr combinations .<br />

Table 5. Pir Bi o_.. Gro wth<br />

No Imll.z;apyr lmazapyr Imazapy r<br />

Imaz apyr ~ lLLoL. ~<br />

No other products . 00 3 .003<br />

Surfactant @ .25\ v/v .007 . 004 . 00 3<br />

Glyphosate @ 1 l b . .019 .017 . 0 18<br />

Glyp hosll.te @ 1 1 /2 lbs . .008 . 02 1 .009<br />

Glyphoaate @ 2 l bs. .008<br />

Triclopyr @ 1 1 / 2 Lb e , . 0 11 .007 . 0 0 1<br />

Triclopyr @ 2 1bs . .00 5<br />

Tabl e 6 . Spruc e Bio aa •• Growt h<br />

No I ma za pyr Imazapyr Imaz apy r<br />

~ ~ ~ lL.Loh<br />

No othe r produc ts . 008 . 002<br />

Surfacta nt @ .25\ v/v . 00 5 . 00 1 .00 4<br />

Gl yphosate @ 1 lb . . 002 .0 0 5 . 008<br />

G1yph o sa t e @ 1 1/ 2 ib e , . 004 .012 . 0 04<br />

Gly ph o s a t e @ 2 1bs. .000<br />

Tri c1 0pyr @ 1 1/2 nse • . 003 . 00 5 -. 028<br />

Tri cl opyr @ 2 Ibs. .001


70<br />

Conc lusi<br />

ons<br />

Applic ati o ns o f low rat e s of imazapyr and tank mixes with g lyphosate and<br />

tr iclopyr we r e a s e f fe c t i ve or be tt e r t h an the ccmmon Ly use d applicati ons of<br />

ei t he r g lyp hos at e or tric lopy r in reduc i ng br o ad le af compet i t io n in ill no r t h ­<br />

er n mixed co ni fe r clear cut. Height gr owth o f t he desi r a b l e spru ce and fir was<br />

r edu ced in the f ir st gro win g aeaa on wi th rates of 4 or 6 ounces of irnazap yr .<br />

F i r bi omass gr owth wa s b est i n combi nat i o ns of glyphosate and imazapyr .<br />

Lit er atu r e Ci t e d<br />

scbee ee i , C .R . 199 1. Glyphosate a nd i mazapy r inter act to r e d u c e com peti tio n.<br />

bu t ma y inju re spruce an d fi r in Maine . Pr oc . NEWSS. <strong>Vol</strong> . 45 . (in<br />

press ) .


71<br />

EFFECTS OF CLEARCUTING AND FOREST FLOOR DISTURBANCE<br />

ON ESTABLI SHMENT AND SURVIVAL OF RASPBERRY<br />

H. R. Roberts a nd H. Dong !<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Di s tu rbed (for est floor re move d ) and und i sturb ed (contro l) p l ot s we re<br />

mon it o r e d over tw o grOWing s e as ons to dete rmine th e ef fe cts o f f ores t: fl oor<br />

d i stu r b a nc e on r e p r odu ct i on of r as pb e r r y (~ spp. ) and oth er woody species.<br />

In Hay 1988 , 30 pairs of I_m 2 p l o t s wer e e s t ablished after clearcu tting i n a<br />

nort he r n hard wood st a nd i n ce n tral New Br unswick, Cana da . In on e plo t: of ea ch<br />

pa i r, the forest floor was remove d to t he min eral so i l to simulat e l ogging<br />

distu rba nce. The o th e r p l ot wa s left undisturbed as a c on t r o l. Af ter<br />

tre atme n t , t here were 2 mi ll io n an d 316 , 000 ger mi na b l e r a s pb e r r y seeds/ha i n<br />

t he so i l s e e d b a nk in t he und isturb ed a nd distur be d plo t s , respecti vely . In<br />

the fir s t ye a r, mos t ge r mi n a t i on o f r a sp b e r r y occ u r r e d by ea rly June in the<br />

d is tu r b e d p l o t s . Ge rminati on peak e d abou t one mon t h l a ter in t he u ndistu rbe d<br />

plot s. At t h e en d of t he gr owing s e a s on , total ger mi nat i on wa s 304 a nd 123 on<br />

t he d isturb e d and und i s t urbed plo t s , r e s pe c t i ve l y. Surviv al wa s 60% on th e<br />

di stur be d p lot s as c ompa r e d t o 48% on t he un d is tu rbe d plot s. Th e s e pat t er n s<br />

are pr ob ably r e l a t ed to t he more favora b l e seedb e d and micro c li ma t e p r ovid e d<br />

by the ex posed min e ral so i l on t h e di s t u rb e d tre a t me nt . Mo s t of the ra spb err y<br />

s eems observed in this s tudy we re r e d raspb erry ( Rubu s ~ Hichx . ).<br />

After one year, th e re sidua l seed ba nk was sampled from a re as th a t wer e<br />

covered to exclu de see d fall dur ing t he pr evious year. There we r e 47 1 ,000<br />

ge rmi na b l e seectsjh a in t h e undistur be d p lot s a nd 4 1 , 00 0 i n the di st urbe d<br />

p l ot s . In the s eco nd y e a r, tot a l germina t i on and survi val we r e g reater on the<br />

und isturbe d plo t s t ha n the d i stu rbe d pl ot s , the opposi te pa tt e rn f r om the<br />

fi rst year. The l arg er number of s e e ds in t he residua l se ed bank and dela y e d<br />

germ i na t i on on t he undi sturbed pl o t s prob ab ly ac c oun t e d fo r t h is di ff e r e nc e .<br />

At the e nd of two y e a r s, t h e total densit y of woody speci e s was 4 34, 93 0<br />

an d 24 6 , 960 stemsjh a on t h e d i s t u rbed a nd undisturbed p lo t s , re spec tive l y.<br />

Ras pberry account ed for 64% of th e stems on the di sturb ed plots and 45% on t he<br />

undistu rbed p l o t s . On bot h tr eat me n t s , over 75% of the raspb er r y s tems were<br />

appa r ent ly v egetat ive s pro ut s f r om t he rhizomes of t he firs t yea r ge r mi n an t s .<br />

In t h e s e c ond ye ar, tota l veg e t a t i ve cove r was simi lar on t he two t reatment s<br />

bv- diff e red by he ight clas s . Cov er wa s g r eat er on th e un d i s t u r b e d plots in<br />

cue 0 - 10 em and 10 ·3 0 em heigh t c la s s e s but was gr eat e r i n the dist u rbed p lot s<br />

in th e >3 0 cm h e i gh t c la s s. The >3 0 cm h e i gh t c l a s s wa s c ompo s e d mos t ly o f<br />

r a s pb e rry .<br />

On t he d i s t u r b e d pl o ts , r a sp be r r y wou ld p ro bab l y pro v id e more intense<br />

compet i t i on fo r commercia l t r e e sp ec i e s suc h as ye ll ow bir ch (~<br />

allegha n i ens Ls Brit .' . Howe ve r, ge r mi nation , su rv ival an d he i gh t o f yellow<br />

birch were al so gre a te r on th e d istu rbed plo ts t h a n ch e undisturb ed plots. If<br />

r eproduccion o f ye l l ow bi rch is de s i r e d , t he n fore s t f lo o r disturba nc e is<br />

rec ommended i n s p ite o f the ris k of incr e a s ed raspbe rry co mpe ti tion .<br />

' As s oc . Pro f . and Gra d . St udenc , Dep t . o f Forest Re sou rc e s , Un ivers it y of<br />

New Brun swic k , Fre der icton , N. B. , Can a da E3B 6C2 .


72<br />

Eff ect o f Va r ious La nd s c a p e Geote x t i les on We ed Roo t De velopmen t<br />

J . F . Deer a nd B . L. App le ton l<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Lands c a pe f a bri c s a re b e i ng d e velop ed as a l t e r n a t i ve s t o<br />

s olid po l yet hy le n e p l a s t ic bec ause their p o ro s i t y pe rmits ..... ate r<br />

a nd gas e xc han g e . Four po ly p ropy le n e fa bc i e s (<strong>Weed</strong> Ba rr le e,<br />

Typ ar, Duon a nd Magic Mat) , thr e e p e r fo ra t e d po ly e t hy l e n e f i l ms<br />

(<strong>Weed</strong> Cont r ol , <strong>Weed</strong> Blo c k a nd We ed s t o p) an d one<br />

polye thyle ne /poly e s ter fa b c ic (Wee d - X) were compa r ed to s o l id<br />

brow n po lyethylene (2.5 mil ), sh redded p ine bark mul ch an d a n<br />

untreated c on t rol for sup pression of bermudagra ss (~<br />

~ (L.) ae r s v l and l arge cr a b gras s [Digitar i a s an g nin ali s<br />

(L . ) Se op.) s hoo t and r oot d ev e lopme n t . Plasti c pots (3.8 L)<br />

were fille d with p i ne bark :s a nd , 4: 1 v/v . Fa bric and fi lm pieces<br />

were s t a p l ed t o th e po t ri m a nd a 2 . 5 cm de pth of pi ne ba rk<br />

place d abo ve the ma te r Le Le , La rge cr a bgrass seed o r 3<br />

ber mudagra s s s t o l ons were p l a c ed a t op the mulch in each po t .<br />

Shoot fresh weig ht a nd root weight below the fabr i c o r film were<br />

r e c o r d e d tw o months after stu dy i nitia tion, and t he s tu dy was<br />

r e pe a t e d.<br />

No tre a t me n t c omp l e tely inh i bite d lar ge c r abg r a s s or<br />

ber muda gra s s s hoo t g ro wt h as we ed r oot s e it her devel oped in t he<br />

mu lc h layer ab ov e t he mate r ials o r p e n e t r a t e d down throu gh t h e<br />

fab r ics a nd film s . We e d -X redu ced ber muda grass shoot fre s h<br />

we ight mor e than a ny other fab ric o r film e xcept <strong>Weed</strong> Con t r o l a nd<br />

Magic Mat. <strong>Weed</strong>-X redu c e d lar g e crabgrass shoot f resh we igh t<br />

mor e than t he o t he r ma te r ials excep t We ed Control and sol id brown<br />

p ol y eth yle n e . No lar ge c rabg ras s an d f e w ber mudag rass roots<br />

p e ne t ra t ed so li d b r own po ly e th y le ne . Few e r ber mud agrass and<br />

lar ge cra b grass r o ot s penet r a t ed We e d -X a nd We e d Con t r o l t ha n all<br />

ot her ma t e r i a l s exc e pt f or so l i d b ro wn po ly e t hy l e n e . I n order of<br />

least to greates t be rm udag ra s s roo t penetra tion, the treatments<br />

were: s ol id brow n polyethyl ene, We ed -X , <strong>Weed</strong> Con tro l, <strong>Weed</strong>s top,<br />

Magi c Mat, We e d Ba rrie r, Typar, <strong>Weed</strong>Block and Duon. Fo r lar g e<br />

crab grass , t he o rde r fro m l east to gr e ates t ro ot penetrat ion was:<br />

s ol i d b r own p oly ethy l ene , we e d -x , <strong>Weed</strong> Can t rol , Mag ic Mat ,<br />

we ed s t op , Typar , <strong>Weed</strong> Ba r r ie r , <strong>Weed</strong>B loc k an d ncon , Fa b r i c s o r<br />

pe r fo r a t ed fi lm s th at re str i ct we e d r oo t pe netr a t i on should<br />

p rov id e gr e a t e r weed co n t ro l than ma t e r ia ls all owing g rea te r r o ot<br />

pe n e t r a t ion.<br />

l We e d Sc ientist and Nur s ery Sp e c ia l i s t , ve , Pol y t ech. Ins t. and<br />

St a te Un i v . , Hampt o n Roads Ag . Exp , Sta ., Vi rg in ia Be ach , VA<br />

23 455 .


73<br />

RESPONSES OF FIELD AND CONTAINER GROWNILEX . RHODODENDRON,<br />

TAXUS, AND CRAPE MYRTLE TO BEi'a'AZON<br />

J . Ray Frank l and C. E. Be s t e 2<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Fie ld a nd conta in e r weed cont r ol exp e ri me n t s wer e condu c t ed d uri ng<br />

1990 usi ng one or two a ppli cati ons of benta zon at 1.1 kg /h a to field<br />

grown 'Hell er 's ' Jap an e s e holly (Ilex cr enat .a ' He l l e r ! ' ) and Roseum<br />

El ega ns rh ododen dr on (Rho dode nd roncatawb len s e cv Rose um El e gans) . The<br />

same r a t e s of be n tazo n a nd a 2 . 2 kg/ha r at e were als o appl i ed to<br />

conta in e r -g rown 'Hi c ks' yew (Tax us x media Reh d , •Hi c k s ! l ' ). ' Ru br a '<br />

c rape myrt le ( Lagerstroem ia i nd i c a •rubra ') an d 'Hellers I Japanese holly.<br />

No significant phytotoxicity or size reduction was o bserved o n field<br />

grown ' He l l er s ' Japanese holly with one or two treatm ents of benta zon a t<br />

1. 1 kg/ha . Significant phytotoxicity a nd re d uc ti o n in g r owt h was<br />

observed on fi eld g rown 'Roseum Elegans ' rhododendron .<br />

Phytotox i c ity t o "r ub r e ", crape myrtle , and ' Hi ck s I yew grown io.<br />

conta ine rs was o.ot appa rent wi t h bentazon t re atm ents up to 2 .2 kg/ha but<br />

a s ign i f ican t s iz e reducti on was observe d at th e end of t he g rowin g<br />

s eason. Phy t ot ox ic i t y t o ' He l l e r s' J a panese holl y g ro wn i n cont a in er s<br />

wa s s ig ni f i c a nt and a s ig n if i c a n t redu ction in pl an t si z e was obs erv ed .<br />

One app lica ti on of ben t az on at 1. 1 kg / ha i n field pl ots co n tro l l ed yellow<br />

nu t s ed g e (Cy pe rus esculentus L.) 90% while t wo tr e a t me n t s a t 1.1 kg/ha<br />

contro lled 98 % of the yellow nu t ae dge ,<br />

l Wee d Sci en ti s t . USDA-ARS. Ft . Detrick . Bldg . 1301. Fr ed e r i c k , HD 2170 2 .<br />

2Assoc . Prof . • Uni versity of Ma r yl a nd. LESREe/Salisbury Fa c il i t y .<br />

Salisbury . MD 2180 1


74<br />

SELeCTIVI TY OF CLOPYRALID I N WOODYORNAMENTALS<br />

J .P .<br />

Ah r e ns l<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Sev e ra l f i eld an d o n e c o n tai n e r exper im ent wer e conducted<br />

from 1985 t o 19 90 wi th c lopy r ali d spr a yed o ve r the t op o r on th e<br />

basal foliage of a n urab e r of wo o d y o r namenta ls . Ra t es of<br />

application ranged from 0.14 to 0.56 kg{ ha i n 270 L/ha .<br />

Bi rd vetch (V i e ia ~~ L .) an d h o r s e v e e d (Co ny z a<br />

can aden s is (L. ) Cr o n q • ros ettes ....e r e c o n t ro l le d at 0 . 14 k g/ ha .<br />

Howe ver , in th e summe r , 0 . 28 k g / h a was ne eded t o ki ll ho r s e v e e d<br />

ove r 20 em tal l. Cont ro l of mugwo rt (A rtem e sia vul g ar i s L.) wa s<br />

over 90% with clopyral1d at 0.56 k g / ha i n J une o r Jul y . Ho weve r,<br />

the best cont rol (ove r 95 %) was with sp li t a p p lic a ti o n s a t 0 .14<br />

o r 0 .28 k g/ha in Jun e or J ul y pl us Sep te mbe r.<br />

Ornamenta ls that to l e rated the sing le or dou ble ap plic ati ons<br />

of clopyralid vt t hou t visible inj u ry included ye'ol (~<br />

~~:~~~:~~ ) ~e~~~~~~:i j ~ n ~ ~~~r ( ~~:~ o~~~: j ~o ~~~~~~:~~; i : I ~; ~~: 'Da r k<br />

c o mpac t a) and whi te spr u c e (P i cea g l auca) . Eas t e r n hemlock<br />

(Ts ug a ca nade n sis) , Do u gl a s fir (Ps eudot su ga me na t e e Ld ) and<br />

fr a s e r fi r (Abies f r aser O developed c ur led needles on th e<br />

youngest g r ov t h of some plants , especially a t 0. 56 k g / h a but t h e<br />

Ln j u r y was t olerable and g r owt h and vigor were not vi sib l y<br />

affec ted . Tempora ry tip chlo rosis also vas obse r ved i n t h e<br />

hemlock . The a d d iti on o f X-77 s u rfact an t a t 0 .2 5% v / v d id n ot<br />

affect woody plant r e s p on s e o r t h e con t ro l of mugw ort<br />

ho r s e vee d •<br />

In another experim ent tende r grow th of Hic k s ye 'ol (Ta x us<br />

med ia hicksi) exhibited s lig h t to mode rate t wi s t i n g fr o m an<br />

Au gus t a p plica t io n o f cl o py ra li d a t 0 .1 5 t o 0 . 4 5 k g /ha ,<br />

indicating tha t ye w cul t iva r s may var y i n their t ol eran c e. Ot h er<br />

activel y growing woody o rnam en tal s t ha t wer e not i n jur e d by<br />

clopyrali d at 0.14 to 0.56 kg/ha included field -grow n Juni peru s<br />

virginian a 'Skyrock et' , and c onta i ner -grown Mug ho pine (Pinus<br />

.!!!.!!.K2mugh us) and Rho dodend ro n 'Ro s e um El e gan s' . Comb i ni ng<br />

cl opyr alid wi t h o xy fl uo r fe n , sethoxyd irn o r is oxaben did not<br />

affect inju ry to Easte r n hemlock, ' Sk y r o c k e t ' j u n i pe r or to Tax u s<br />

cuspidata densiformis in the field .<br />

The effectiveness of clopyralid in contro lling tr o ub l e s o me<br />

weeds in t h e As t er ac e o e and Fa b ac e a e families and it s appar e n t<br />

safe ty in many wo od y o r name ntals coul d make i t a valuab l e fu t u re<br />

tool in the la ndscape and nur sery ind u stries.<br />

Plant Phy siologist , The Connecticut Agric ultural Experi ment<br />

S t a ti o n , Valley Laboratory , Windsor , CT 06095 .


75<br />

COMMON GROUNDSEL INTERFERENCE IN<br />

CONTAINER~GROWN NURSERY CROPS<br />

Susan M. Mulgrew 1<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Common groundse l (Senecio vulgaris L) is frequently fou nd infesting nursery crops in the<br />

Northeast. II is considered part icularly troublesome in ccotamer-q rown crops because it begins<br />

growing in containers stored in overwintering houses, prio r 10 spring applications of<br />

preemergence herbicid es. Common grou ndsel also germinates in late summer and early autumn ,<br />

when many spring-applied preemergence herbicides are no longer active. Altho ugh commo n<br />

groundsel is frequentl y found In Northeast nurseries. its affec t on the growth of nursery crops has<br />

nOIbeen established.<br />

Common gro undsel interferen ce was determined in container-grown boxwood (Buxus<br />

sempervirens L. 'Wintergreen'), euonymus [a variegated sport of Euonymus ton unet radicans<br />

(Seibold ex Mlq,) Rehd.), and Sargent juniper (Juniperus cmnensts sargent ii A. Henry). Bare-root<br />

liners of each species were planted in 3.8 Land 7.5 L contai ners between February 23, 1990 and<br />

March 1, 1990. Three-week-old groundsel seedlings were transplanted into the containers at<br />

rates of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeds/con tainer on February 26 (euonymus and juniper) and February<br />

28 (boxwood). Any additiona l weeds that germinated in the containers dur ing the experiment<br />

were removed by hand. Nursery crop growth index «height + width .1 + width .2)/3) , where<br />

width.1 and width .2 are measurements taken in north-south and east-west direct ions, was used to<br />

determine the effect of groundsel interference on the growt h of the nursery crops . Growth<br />

indices were measured on February 28 (0 weeks) and 2, 4, and 6 weeks after transplanti ng (WAT)<br />

the groundsel seedlings . Since the groundsel plants had set seed and some had begun to<br />

senesee by 6 WAT, the experiment was terminated after the 6 WAT measurement. The<br />

experiment was condu cted In a polyhouse where the temperatures were maintained between 22"C<br />

(day) and 12·C (night).<br />

Common groundsel did not interfe re with the growth of euonymus , but reduced the<br />

growth of boxwood 2 through 6 WAT. The decrease in boxwood growth was linear at 4 and 6<br />

WAT (Table 1). There was also a linear decrease In juniper growth at 4 and 6 WAT (Table 2).<br />

'Assistant Professor of Nursery Crops, Dept. of Plant and Soil <strong>Science</strong>s, University of<br />

Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 0 1003.


76<br />

Table 1<br />

Effect 01 common groundsel and contai ner size on the growth Index of 'Wintergreen '<br />

boxwood .<br />

mean growth index (em)"<br />

Treatmen t o WAr'" 2 WAT 4 WAT 6WAT<br />

weeoe/cco tatner<br />

0 10.1 11.3 14.9 16. 1<br />

1 10.9 12.5 16.1 17.5<br />

2 10.5 11 .8 14.6 15.4<br />

3 10.1 1 1.1 13.8 15.2<br />

4 10.6 11.6 14.5 15.0<br />

Treatme nt significance<br />

<strong>Weed</strong>s<br />

NS'<br />

Linear<br />

NS<br />

Ouadrat ic NS NS NS<br />

Container size NS NS<br />

'Gr owt h Inde x is de term ined by (he ight • widlh .l • wi(1th.2)/ 3 Width .l and widlh .2 are mll8surament s taken In nortn.<br />

south and east-weS1 direction s<br />

~AT • weeks after transplanhllg common groundsel seedl ing s into ocnta lners.<br />


77<br />

SEL ECTIVITY OF SULFONYL UREA HERBI CI DES I N WOODYORNAMENTALS<br />

John F . Ah r e ns!<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The po tent i al for herbi cide l eachi ng t o g r o u n d water le d us<br />

t o ev alu ate l o w rate s u lf o ny l urea herbicides f or selec t i v ity i n<br />

....c o dy o r n am e nta ls . In o n e exp e r i me n t c h l o rim uron 9 , 18 an d 36<br />

g /ha, thifen sulfuro n 17 .5, 3 5 a n d 7 0 g/ h a a n d CGA- 13687 2 20 . 4 0<br />

a nd 8 0 g/ ha were sp r a yed o ve r o r namen ta l s in 270 L/ ha a month<br />

af ter pl ant in g and r e a p p li e d in May f or t v o mo r e s e a so ns . All<br />

wer e tank-m ixed with o r y ae Lt n 1.12 kg/ h a t o control a n n ua l<br />

grasses . The plants included arb orvitae (Th uja oc c ide n tali s<br />

' Li t t l e Gi a nt ') ye w (Tax us c uspi date d e n s t Eo r sri s ) , Eas te r n<br />

hemlock (Ts ug a ca nadensis) , Rhododen dron 'Nov a Ze mbl a ' an d<br />

Co t o n e as t e r s a l i c i f o l i a 'Re pandens .'<br />

Th e su lf on yl urea herb i ci des gave po s teme rg e nce a nd s h ort<br />

pr e erae r g enc e control o f cert ain bro a d l e af we e d s, n ot abl y c or n<br />

chamo mil e (Anthemis e r ve ns t s L.) but resi d u a l c o n t rol 2 t o 3<br />

mont h s a f t e r weed i ng, especia lly wi th t hi f en su lfuron o f t e n was<br />

be t ter th a n wi th or y z al i n al on e .<br />

Chlor im u ro n a nd CGA- 136872 at a l l rate s injured co ton eas ter<br />

exces sive ly but t h Lf e n s u Lf u r on injury was te mporar y. Arborvitae<br />

an d yew o f t e n ex h i b i t ed early s e a s o n c h Lc r c s Ls ....i t h re c over y f r o e<br />

the sulfonyl u r e e s wh er e as heml ock was unaf f e cted b y a ny<br />

t r e a t ae n t . Only CGA-136 872 at 80 glha si gnificantl y Ln j u r ed<br />

rhodod endron with e a r Ly vein al ch Lo r o e t s and Lnc r e a s ed eo r t e t t t y .<br />

Chlo r im u ro n and CGA-136 872 we r e eva lua ted in o t he r<br />

e x perime nt s . CGA- 136872 at 40 o r 80 g l h a + X-77 0 .2 5 % v l v in<br />

ap r t I e u p p r e s e e d field b o r ee t a I 1 (Equ ise tum ~ L.) f o r 2<br />

month s a n d quackgras s (~ . e pe n s ( L .) Be a u v ; ) f o r 3 months<br />

with no i n j u ry t o d or mant Ea s t e r n wh it e pine (Pinus st robus) .<br />

Ch lo rim u r o n a t; 9 to 36 glh a i n Ju ne suppr essed field h o r s et a il<br />

fo r 1 mon t h wi t h o ut inj ury to a c t ive ly gr o win g white pin e .<br />

Chlori muron a t 9 o r 18 g/ ha i n Dc t ob e r co nt ro ll ed seedl i ng<br />

hc r eevee d (Cooy za can ad ensi s ( L.) Cr o nq.) a nd in j u red newl y<br />

pla nte d b ut no t establi shed Den a i f o r mi s yew . Chlor i muro n a t 9 o r<br />

18 g/ ha + X- 7 7 at 0.25% vl v a l s o contr o lled s e e d li ngs of pi gweed<br />

(Amaranthus .!:!..E....E..) and h o r s ewe e d i n July with no i n j u r y to fr a s e r<br />

fir (Abies f r e ee r t ) . Contain e r c-g r o wn mu g ho p ine ( Pin us ~<br />

mughus) and Rh o do d e n d ro n 'R o seum Elega ns' v e r e u n af fecte d by<br />

chlori muro n a t 9 to 36 g/ h a .<br />

It a p pe a r s that th ese h erb icide s ca n b e sa f e ly u se d in a<br />

number o f woody ornament a ls . Cb l c r t mu r o n an d CGA- 136B 72 des e r ve<br />

fur ther ev aluation.<br />

Plan t Physi o log ist , The Connec ti cu t Agr i cu l tural Exp e r i me n t<br />

Stat i on , Val le y Laborator y , Wind s or , CT 0609 5 .


78<br />

TOLERANCE OFDIRECT-SEEDED CUTFLOWERS TOPREEMERGF..NCE<br />

HERBICIDES<br />

A.F. Senesac ll and J.e.Neal2<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Field grown cutflowers are an increasinglyimportantand profitable component of<br />

manyroadsidemark et operationsinNew York. Mostof the preemergenceherbicides<br />

registered for cutflowers are appliedpostemergenceto transplants,but there is interest in<br />

direct seeding some of the most popular species. However, there is very little informa tion<br />

about plant tolerance of the more commonly used herbicides with this method of planting.<br />

Two field studies were conducted in 1989 and 1990 at the Long Island Horticultural<br />

Research Laboratory to examine the tolerance of Zinnia~ and Celosia


79<br />

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES ON CONT AlNER G ROWN NURSE R Y STOC K<br />

Larry J. Kuhns and Joanne E. Looset/<br />

ABSTRAcr<br />

Herbi cides used to contro l weeds in container grown orname ntal s mus t overcome three<br />

obstacles. Most of the media usedtoda y have a very high organi c man er content, the plant s are<br />

frequently irrigated , and uniform distribution of granul ar materials is difficult to obtain in the<br />

confined areas common to containe r produ ction nurserie s. The herbicide formul ation s used in this<br />

study were desi gned to overcome one or more of these obstac les. Metolachlor + simazin e in a 4: I<br />

ratio and 5% gran ular form ulat ion was applied at 2.2. 4.4, and 8.8 kg ai/ha. Three 2% granular<br />

formulations of oxa dia zon were applied at 2.2 and 4.4 kg ai/ha. They were the standard Ronstar 7J<br />

fennulation with an 18/40 partic le size. on a Biodac carri er with an 18/40 particle size. and on a<br />

Biodac carrier with a IfV30 panicle size. A ready-to -use 1% microe ncaps ulated form ulation of<br />

triflurali n was applied throug h a hose and garden spray nozzle at 2.2 and 4.4 kg ai/ha. G ran ular<br />

materials were spread in individual pots by hand.<br />

Eac h treatment was applied to six species of newly potted roo ted cuttings of woody<br />

ornamental shrubs: yellcwrwlg dogwood ~~L.), borde r fors yth ia~X<br />

~ Zab.), Cascade azalea (Rhododendron spp.) , Van houtte spirea (Spiraea X<br />

Vanhouttei[C. Briot (Zab.)]), dwarf Korean lilac


80<br />

Both rates and all form ulation s of oxadiazon provided more than 50% control of grasses at<br />

time 1, and all but the low rate of the 16130Biodac formu lation provided total control at time 2.<br />

At time I, at the low rate of application, the conunerc ial fonnu lation of oxadiazo n (Ronstar)<br />

provided better control of the purslane than theoxadiazon on the Biodac carrier. At the higher rate<br />

of application the control of thepurslane was better , but there was no difference between<br />

formul ations. At rime 2, all treatm ents prov ided excellent control of thepurslane except the 18/40<br />

mesh Biodac, which pro vided abou t 50% control. At time 1 and time 2 the high rate of the<br />

commercial formulation provided better control of the other broad leaved weeds than the low race<br />

or either rate of the other formula tions.<br />

Both rates of trifluralin pro vided exce llent control of purslane throughout the study. Its<br />

co ntrol af the oilier broadleaved weeds was excell ent at timel, and very good 14 weeks. Both<br />

rates provided excellent co ntrol at time 1. At time 2 thehigh rate provided total control and the low<br />

rate no control.<br />

The lilac could not be rated for injury because of generally poor, erratic growth . Non e of<br />

the herbicides except nifluralin caused any visual injury symptoms on any of the plants. At time 1,<br />

some plan ts of all species treated with nifluralin had slightly chlorotic. burned , or curled leaves. In<br />

almost all case s new gro wth developed beyond the injured leaves, making the injury less<br />

noticeabl e. Several of the treated dogwoods also seemed to be rooting poorly, as they were loose<br />

in the pot At time 2 there were no visual symptoms of inj ury to any of the plants . Howe ver, an<br />

exami natio n of the root systems of severa l do gwood and forsythi a plants from each treatme nt<br />

showed the root systems of the triflurali n treated plants were smaller than those from the other<br />

treatments. Appare ntly there was enough water and fertilizer applied to support nonnal top grow th<br />

even with a redu ced roo t system .


Table 1. <strong>Weed</strong>controlprovided by preemergenceherbicides appliedto six speciesof containergrown<br />

ornamentals. The numbersrepresentthe averageweedcountpercontainer. Herbicides were<br />

appliedinmid- tolate June andcountsweremade 6 and14 weeksafterthe last application. All<br />

weedswereremoved from the potsat the first ratingperiod.<br />

Other<br />

~ ~ QImes<br />

~ Rate (kgailHa) l1mU :J:i!lU Ii!m..l :Ii!M.l Iimtl IiInti<br />

Control 0.0 3.0 0.9 0.9 2.9 1.5 0.3<br />

Metolachlor+ Simazine 1.7 + 0.4 2.0 1.3 0.5 1.4 0.4 0.1<br />

Metolachlor+ Simazine 3.5 + 0.9 1.9 l.l 0.2 1.2 0.1 0.1<br />

Metolachlor+ Simazine 7.0 + 1.8 1.6 0.6 0.3 1.5 0.1 0.1<br />

Oxadiawn (Ronstar) 18/40 2.2 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.0<br />

Oxadiawn (Ron star) 18/40 4.4 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.0<br />

Oxadiazon(Biodac) 18/40 2.2 1.3 0.5 0.5 1.3 0.7 0.0<br />

Oxadiazon(Biodac)18/40 4.4 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.0<br />

Oxadiawn (Biodac)16/30 2.2 1.1 0.1 0.6 2.4 0.7 0. 1<br />

Oxadiawn (Biodac)16130 4.4 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.0<br />

Trifluralin 2.2 0.2 0. 1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.3<br />

Trifluralin 4.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0<br />

~


83<br />

The Effect of Nutrient Availability on Competiti on between Velvetlea! and Kidney Beans<br />

E. T. Maynard and H. C. Wien 1<br />

ABSTRAC T<br />

A field experiment was initiated in 1989 to dete rmin e the re lationship be twe en<br />

velvetleaf CAhutilan~ Medik.) density and yield of kidn ey be ans (p hase olus<br />

~ L. 'Redkloud ') . Beans were planted in the secon d week of June , with 21, 28,<br />

and 35 kg/ha of N, P, and K, respectively, banded on one side of the be an row, and<br />

0, I, 4, 16 or 64 velvetleaf/m ' sown close to the row on the other side. Velvetleaf<br />

growth was not vigorous , and bean yield showe d only a slight response to velvetleaf<br />

density: a linear regression predicted that 33 velvetleaf/ m' would decreas e bean yield<br />

by 5%. In a different expe riment , velvetleaf show ed a ten-fold increase in mean dry<br />

weight pe r plant in respo nse to a nearby fertilizer band. This obse rvation, together<br />

with soil test results indicating low leve ls of P and K, suggested that velvetleaf would<br />

be more competitive if given access to more nutrients . In 1990 tre atments designed<br />

to provide velvetleaf with more nutrients were adde d to the experiment. In these<br />

-+F" trea tments , in addition to banding NPK as in 1989, 44 and 83 kg/h a of P and K,<br />

respe ctively, were broadcast and incorpor ated prior to planting, and velvetle ai was<br />

sown on the same side of the row as the fertilizer band. Other tre atments (-F) we re<br />

unchanged from 1989. Early-emerging velvetl eaf in the +F plots produced more<br />

than ten times as much dry weight by mid·Augus t as in -F plots . In the +F plots<br />

only, bean dry we ight in August showed a slight linear decre ase with increasing<br />

velvetIeaf dens ity. When grown in the greenhouse at three levels of P, sole<br />

velvetIeaf showe d a proportion ately grea ter increase in dry weight and height in<br />

response to P than did sole beans. Field and greenhouse resul ts both sugg est that<br />

the amount of fertilizer available to velvetIeaf and to be ans is important in<br />

determining the degree to which velvetleaf will interfere with bean growth .<br />

'Graduate Stude nt and Assoc . Prof., Dept. of Fruit and Vegetab le <strong>Science</strong> , Cornell<br />

University, Ithaca, NY 14853


SHARPSHOOTER<br />

84<br />

EFFICACY IN COVER CROP BURN-DOWN AND<br />

POTATO VINE-KILL<br />

T. A. Blomgren and R.R . Betlinder '<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Potassium salts of medium chain length, saturated fatty acids are being developed as a<br />

herbicide under the trade name Sharps hooter. It is nonselect ive, and works on contact by<br />

disrupting cell membrane s. Action is rapid, often prog ressing fro m water-soaking to necrosis<br />

of affected tissue within a few hours. Trans location appears not to occur. The primary<br />

focus of this study was to determi ne how Sharpshooter compared with currently used<br />

nonselective herbicides in cover crop regulation. A preliminary greenhouse study conducted<br />

in the winter of 1989 indicated that, at 4 and 8% (v/v) rates, Sharpshooter could provide<br />

effective (>70 %) control of hairy vetch CYi.tiaYil.J..Qsa L.) and rye ~~ L.) but<br />

performed inadequ ately « 70%) with red clover CIr:i.fuI.i.ym~ L.) and red fescue<br />

~ mb.raL. ). In the spring of 1990 Sharpshooter efficacy was eval uated in the field.<br />

Six herbicide treatments were applied to 2 stages of rye (46cm and 76cm) . The treatments<br />

included 1) an untreated check , 2) paraquat (.56 kg a .Uha), 3) glyphosate (1 .68 kg a.Uha) ,<br />

4)Sharpshooter-8 % (v/v), 5) Sharpshooter-12% and 6) Sharpshoote r-8 % applied twice. Both<br />

glyphosate and paraquat performed better than all Sharpshooter treat ments . Glyphosate<br />

provided com plete control and paraqua t was more than 85 % effective at both stages of rye<br />

growth. At the earlier stage, 52, 65 and 78% control of rye was obtained with 8, 12 and the<br />

duplicated 8% applications of Sharpshoo ter, respectively. At the later stage there was no<br />

diffe rence in control regard less of Sharps hooter rate; both provided approximately 75 %<br />

control. Two application s of Sharpshooter (8+ 8%) did not provide bette r control at the later<br />

stage than did the single application. A second study was condu cted in September of 1990 to<br />

compare Sharpshoo ter to paraquat for potato vine-kill. Sharpshooter was applied at 8 and<br />

12 % (v/v) rates and paraquat was applied at .56 kg a.U ha. All 3 trea tments provided more<br />

than 97 % control, suggesting that Sharpshooter may be effective as a pota to desiccant.<br />

1 Grad . Student and Assoc. Pro fessor, Department of Fru it and Vegetable <strong>Science</strong> , cornell<br />

Unive rsity, Ithaca NY 14853.


85<br />

WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES WITH DPX-E9636, GLUPHOSINATE<br />

AND PARAQUAT<br />

Gregory A Porter and Jonathan A Sisson'<br />

ABSTRACf<br />

Broadleaved weeds and quackgrass (Agropyro n Teoen s L) simul taneo usly infest<br />

many fields in the Northeas t. While several herbicides provide good control of most<br />

broadJeaved weeds in Maine potato (Sola num h lberosu ffi L.) fields, effective grass<br />

herbicides are limited. Herbicides are needed which allow consistent quackgrass control,<br />

preferably at the same time that broad leaved weeds are being controlled.<br />

DPX·E9636, gluphosinat e, and paraquat were applied alon e or in combinatio n<br />

with metri buzin or Iinuron in 1990 field experiments at Presqu e Isle, Maine . <strong>Weed</strong><br />

pressure consisted of musta rd spp. (prim arily Brassica campest ris L.), lambsquarters<br />

(Chenopo dium album L ) and quackgrass at the following average den sities: 244, 28 and<br />

94 per m 2 , respectively. The pot ato variety used was 'Katahdin' . In one experiment,<br />

DPX·E9636 was evaluated alone as a postemergence (POST) treatment at rates ranging<br />

from 0.018 to 0.069 kg ai ha' or as a POST tank-mix with metr ibuzin (0.28 to 0.42 kg ai<br />

ha'). Additional treatments provided an evalua tion of DPX-E9636 as a preemergence<br />

(PE) tank-mix with linuron. In a second experiment~ gluph?s inate was applied a ~ .<br />

groundcrack (GCK) at two rates (0.56 and 0.84 kg at ha" eithe r alo ne or tank-mixed With<br />

0.56 kg ai ha'! metribuzin. Additiona l treatments include d paraquat (0.28 kg ai ha" )<br />

applied at GCK either alone or with 0.56 kg ai ba'' metribuzin .<br />

In the first experimen t, DPX·E9636 resulted in slight chlorosis and leaf curling of<br />

the potato foliage at 14 days after treatment (DAT), but not at 36 DAT. Injury<br />

increased significantly with application rate. All metribuzin and Iinuron treatments<br />

provided excellent broadleaved weed control. DPX -E9636 (POST) provided fair mustard<br />

control by 13 DAT and excellent contro l by 36 DAT. The lowest DPX ·E9636 rate<br />

provided fair lambsquarters contr ol while the rema ining rate s pro vided good controL<br />

DPX-E9636 (POST) provided excellent quackgrass control by 36 DAT regar dless of rate ;<br />

however, PE app lications were not effective . Treatments whicb effectively contro lled<br />

quackgrass genera lly had significantly higher yields than those which did not. In the<br />

second experiment , GC K treatme nts containing gluphosinate or para qua t resulte d in<br />

significant leafburn of potato. Injury symptoms for gluphosinate were more severe and<br />

long lasting. All trea tments provided good to excellent season-long mustard con trol<br />

except for gluphosinate without me tribuzin. The highe r glupb osinat e rat e provided good<br />

quac kgrass control by 10 DAT. Tank-mixes with metribuzin improved mustard and<br />

quackgrass control by both paraquat and gluphosi nate. Alth ough all gluphosinate<br />

treatments appeared to decrease yields, only the 0.84 kg ai ha" treatments were<br />

significantly lower than the handweeded check.<br />

'Asst . Professo r and Research Assoc., Dep t. of Plant, Soil and Environme ntal <strong>Science</strong>s,<br />

University of Maine, Orono. ME 04469.


86<br />

TOlERANCE<br />

OF OF CAULIFLOWER AND BROCCOU TO MEfOLACHLOR<br />

A.F. Senesecl/ ,R.R. Bellinder2 D. Wilcox-Lee3 and R.W. Wallace 4<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Metolachlor, a widely used preemergence herbicide, could be a useful tool for weed<br />

control in crucifers. Early season plant stunting has been observed in some crucifers with<br />

high rates of metolachlor. Although actual yield loss may not occur, a delay in harvest<br />

maturity can be a result of this stunting.<br />

Field studies were conducted ove r a three year periodat two locations: Riverhead.<br />

L.I, and Freeville, New York to examine the effect that post-transpla nt applications of<br />

me tolac hlor have on total yield and harves t maturity of ca uliflowe rCBrassica oleracea italjca<br />

L. ) and broccoli (BrassieR oJeracea botD'tjs L.) cultivars. On Long Island, cauliflower<br />

cultivars 'Snow Crown'(198S-1990) and 'Snowball Imperial'( 1988} and 'Andes' (l 989­<br />

1990) were transplant ed bare root in the summer into Riverhead Sandy Loam. Me tclachlor<br />

was applied 48 hours postplant and irrigated immediat ely. At f reeville, cauliflower 'Snow<br />

Crown' and 'Andes'(1989-1990) and broccoli 'Emperor ' and Green Co met' (1989-199 0)<br />

were sown in transplant cells in the greenhous e and planted in the spring in Eel silt loam .<br />

On Lo ng Island, both cultivars were harvested over a period of several weeks in the<br />

fall. Curd weight of either cultivar in any of the three years was not significantly reduced<br />

by metolachlorrates of up to 4.48 kglha In 1988 and 1990, the time to harves t maturity<br />

was also not adversely affected. In 1989, the wettes t of the three years, the time to<br />

maturity was significantly delayed by mero lachlor rates of 1.68 kgtha or more .<br />

At Freeville , both cauliflower and broccoli were harvested in a more concentrated<br />

time period during the summer. Neither total yield nor the time to maturity were<br />

significant ly affected by metolachlor Tatesranging from 1.68 to 4.48 kglha.<br />

At both locations , some early season plant stunting was observed, especial ly at the<br />

higher rates. However in only one year and at one site, 1989 on Long Island, was the<br />

plant stunting severe enough to result in a harvest delay. It appears from the results of<br />

these studies that cauliflower and broccoli can tolerate metolachlor fairly well under a<br />

variety of condi tions, but that some plant stunting and harvest delay can occur under very<br />

wet soil conditions.<br />

II<strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong> Specialis t, Cornell Coope rative Extension, Long Island Horti cultural<br />

Research Laboratory, Riverhead, New York 11901 .<br />

21Associate Professor, Dept. of Fruit and Vege table Scie nce, Corne ll University, Ithaca,<br />

NY 14853<br />

31Associate Professor, Dept of Fruit and Vegetable Scie nce, Cornell University, Long<br />

Island Horticultural Research Laboratory, Riverhead , New York 1190 1.<br />

4/Graduate Research Asst. Dept of Fruit and Vegetable <strong>Science</strong> , Cornell Univers ity,<br />

Ithaca, NY 14853


87<br />

clo pyralid and pyri da t e f or postemerqenc e<br />

Br oa diea.! <strong>Weed</strong> Contro l in Crucifers<br />

Russell W. Wall ace a nd Rob i n R. Be Ll Ln d ez-!<br />

AB STRA CT<br />

Field studies wer e c ondu c t e d in 1990 at th e Ve ge t a b l e crops<br />

Rese ar ch Farm i n Fr e e v i l le , NY, to d e te rm i ne the eff ects of<br />

po s t eme rg e nce t r ea t men t s of c lo pyra l i d and pyridate on weed<br />

c on t r ol , c r op inju ry , and y ie l d in ca bba g e (Brassica a le ra c e a<br />

var. cap i t ata) , brocc o l i (~ aleracea v a x . ~) and<br />

cau liflo wer (Br as s ica al era cea va r . ~) . All p lo ts we r e<br />

t r e a t e d wi th triflura lin (0 .8 4 kg ai / hal ap pl ie d pr epl a nt<br />

incorporat e d for gr a s s con t roL In cabbage , cl op yr al id (0 .2 1 a nd<br />

0 . 4 2 kg a i /ha l a n d p yr idate (0.50 and L Oa k g ai / ha l we r e ap p lied<br />

a lo ne and tan k - mixed at J (Epo s t) and 5 (Lp os t ) weeks af te r<br />

tran splanti ng (May 30 ) . Four ca bbag e cu lt i vars we re e va luat ed<br />

a nd i nc l u d ed: Tastie, Super Dan e , Br avo , an d Hinova. In<br />

br occoli ( Emp e ro r and Gr een Comet) a nd caul if lowe r (S now Cr own<br />

and And e s) , b o t h herb ic ide s we re a pp lied a lo n e and in com bi n a t io n<br />

at t h e l ower rates , but on l y a t t h e earl i er ti ming . Br o a dlea f<br />

wee d s pe c i e s i n t h e e xp e r ime nta l si t e s incl uded re d r oo t pigw eed<br />

(Arna r a nt hus re trof lex u s L . ) , c ommon lamb squarters (Ch en opodium<br />

s.l.Qym L .) , ha ir y ga l i n s og a ( ~tiJ..i.s:tA (Raf .) Blake , a nd<br />

c ommon pur s lane (~ o ler acea L .). In t he c a bb a g e s tudy ,<br />

c ont r o l of re dr oo t p i gwe e d wa s 95% or b ett er wi t h bo t h herbicid es<br />

r e g a r d l e s s of rate or t i min g . Tank - mixed t rea t me n t s also gav e<br />

excel len t c on t r o L I n t h e br o c c oli an d cau l i fl owe r s tu d i es ,<br />

gr e a t e r th an 9 5 % contro l of common l ambs qu ar t ers , ha i r y g alinso g a<br />

a nd co mmon pur sla ne wa s also o bse rv e d. Injur y f rom pyr i da t e wa s<br />

obs erve d a s chl or os is of t r e a t ed l ea ves, while no v i s u a l i nj u r y<br />

resu lted f ro m cl op yral id. Al l thre e crucife rs t e sted we r e<br />

sens it i ve to pyri d a te , wi th cab bag e being le as t a nd br occ oli the<br />

mos t sensi ti v e . Howe v e r, inj u ry sym p t oms gen e ra l l y d e c re as e d<br />

afte r 3 we e k s . I n c abba ge , Ta s t i e wa s mos t su s c e p t i b l e t o<br />

inju r y , but the hi gh r ate o f py ri d a t e a p pl i ed Epost ca used the<br />

mos t injury t o al l cul t iv ar s . wit h ca ul i fl ower and br oc co li,<br />

i nj ury was gr e a t e s t i n And es an d Gr een Comet, respecti v ely .<br />

In j ur y f ro m pyr ida t e did no t corre la t e with r e duce d yields i n<br />

th r e e ou t of t h e f ou r c abb a g e c u l t i va r s . Yields i n al l cu lt ivar s<br />

ex c ep t Hi no v a we re not red u c e d . Hi nova , h owev e r , wa s th e lates t<br />

matur ing cu l ti var, and t hi s ma y h a v e p l a y e d a r o l e in th e yi e l d<br />

res pon s e t o t h e h er b icide tr e at me nts . In c a u l i f l owe r a nd<br />

broccoli, no sig ni f ican t r e du ct i ons in y ie ld oc c ur r ed wi t h an y<br />

pos te mergen ce h erbicide tr e a t ment .<br />

I Res earch Tech . and Asso c . pr o f e s s or , Dept . of Fru i t an d<br />

ve g e t a b l e <strong>Science</strong>, Co rnell Univ e r s i t y , Ith ac a , NY 1485 3.


88<br />

Potential Diphenyleth er Herb icides<br />

for Use in Snap Beans<br />

R.R. Bellinder and R.W . Wallace l<br />

Abstract<br />

The loss of dinoseb and chlorambe n has necessitated the development of alternative methods<br />

of controllin g broadleaf weeds in snap beans~~ L.). The objec tive of this<br />

research was to evaluate preemergence (PRE) and postemergence low dose applications of<br />

acifluorfen , fomesafen and Jactofen on crop phytotoxicity and weed control in snap beans (var .<br />

'Labrador'). The herbicides were applied at different rates and timings based on known<br />

potential phytotoxicities. Rates were : acifluorfen 0.07 to 0.56 kg ailha PRE and at the ls t<br />

trifoliate; fomesafen 0.28 to 0.5 6 kg ailha PRE , lst trifoliate, and prebloo m; and lactofen 0.14<br />

to 0.56 kg ailha PRE and at ground crack. Metolachlor (1.7 kg ailha PRE) was applied to the<br />

experimental site and the study was irrigated (2.5cm) after both the PRE and the ground crack<br />

timings. Greater than 25 % crop injury occurred when acifIuorfen was applied at 0.5 6 kg PRE<br />

and at 0. 42 and 0.56 kg at the 1st trifoliate. Fomesafen injury . general ly half that observed with<br />

acifIuorfen , was eviden t at 0.56 and 0.42 kg applied PRE and at the 1st trifolia te, respectively.<br />

Stands were significantl y reduced in the lactofe n ground crack treatments. Lactofen injury ( 19­<br />

63 %) at harves t, occurred with 0.56 kg PRE and with 0.14 , 0.2 8 and 0.56 kg at ground crack.<br />

In spite of partial control resulting from the metolachlo r application, all preemerge nce treat ments<br />

provided season-long control of redroct pigweed ~~ L. ) and common<br />

lambsquarte rs (Chenopodium al.!mm. L.). Control of wild buckwheat~~<br />

L. ) was excellent with fomesafen at all rates and timing s. Applied posteme rgence , 0.07 kg<br />

(acifluorfe n), 0.14 kg (lactofen) , and 0.2 8 kg (fomesafen) effectively controlled redroot pigweed.<br />

Postemergence control of com mon lambsquart ers and wild buckwheat required at least 0. 28 kg<br />

of acifluorfe n for adequat e control. Desp ite evident crop injury in several cases , yields were<br />

reduced only when acifl uorfen (0.42 , 0.56 kg) was applied at the Jst trifol iate and when lactofen<br />

(0. 56 kg) was applied at ground crack. Yields of fomesafe n-treated beans were equal to or<br />

greater than yields of the handweeded controls.<br />

'Assoc. Professor and Research Tech. , Dept. of Fru it and Vegetab le <strong>Science</strong>, Cornell<br />

University , Ithaca , NY 14853.


1 Re s earch Te ch ni c i an a nd Asso ciate Pr ofessor , De pt. of Fruit & Vegetab le<br />

Sci enc e , Corne ll Un i versity . It h a c a. NY 148 53<br />

89<br />

DIVERSI TY AND SPREAD OF SEDGE WEEDS IN NEW'YORK MUCKONIONS<br />

A. L. Westman and L . A. El le rbrock 1<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Yellow nu t sedge ( Cyp e r u s ~ L . ) has re cent ly become the wor s t<br />

we ed in New Yor k muck onions (Al l i lUD~ L.) a nd threate n s the stat e's<br />

i ndu st r y. Pr evention of i nf e s t a t i ons i s t he on ly practical method o f<br />

con t ro llin g t h is weed i n muck oni ons at present and in the nea r f uture .<br />

The i mporta n c e of se ed i n spread of y e l l ow nutsedge in muc k fie lds wa s<br />

studied by examining 1) emergence and growt h o f seed lings a nd t ube r<br />

s prouts from co llected soil, an d 2) v i ab ility of fi el d · co ll ecte d s eeds.<br />

Soil a nd ma t u r e s e dge i nf l o re scences were co l le c t e d Sep t embe r- October<br />

1989 fr om New Yor k State mu c k an d mi n eral s o il fie ld s i n f e s t e d wi th<br />

yellow nutsed ge. Tuber s p r ou t s from 10 sampled fi el d s we re g rown to<br />

matu rit y i n t h e greenhou se. Plants f r om nine of t he fie lds i n i t i a t ed<br />

fl or a l dev el op me n t. However , the percentage of plants ebac formed<br />

i n f l ores ce nc e s varied among counties and among f ields with in a county ,<br />

ra ng ing fro m 11 ' to 10 0 ' for a fi eld.<br />

In gre enh ouse studi e s, sedge seed lings emerge d f rom sc reened soil of<br />

t hr ee mu ck f ie l d s , one f i eld each f r om Genesee, Ora nge, a nd Oswego<br />

Count ies (we ste r n , sou t h eastern, and ce ntra l New York r e sp e c t i v e l y ) ;<br />

se edlings fro m two fie lds wer e gr own t o ma t u r i t y. Genesee Coun t y pla nts<br />

produce d tubers b u t d i d not flowe r I an d we r e i de n t if ie d a s yellow<br />

nut s e dg e . Orange Co unty pla nts were fro m soi l of an aba n done d mu ck<br />

field. All pl ants flowered and produced seeds , bu t formed ne i t h e r<br />

un de rground r hi zomes nor t ubers; the y were identified as t he annua l<br />

Cyperu s odoratu s L . See ds colle ct ed from th ese Oswego an d Orange Count y<br />

field s , and f r om a Madi son Coun t y ( ce n t r a l New Yo r k) fiel d, germinated in<br />

th e gr e e nh ou s e . Plants f r om Oswe go County seed were a ll y e l l ow nutsedge ;<br />

pl ants from Ora n ge Count y s e e d were y e l l ow nu tsedge a nd .Q..... odo ratus;<br />

plan ts from Madison Cou n t y seed were ye llow nuts e dge and a pe r en n i al<br />

species of Car e x . In addit ion, sedge seeds co llected f r om f ive muck and<br />

t hree mineral so il fields i n 198 9 were v i ab l e af te r one ye a r dr y sto r age .<br />

In or der t o stu dy sed ge speci es d iv ersity i n muc k fie lds, young se dge<br />

plants were c o ll e c t e d fr om an Oswe go Coun ty onion f ie l d in 1990 and gr own<br />

t o maturi t y i n t h e g reen h ou s e . Pl an ts co lle cted include ye l low nut s ed g e ;<br />

Cyperus odo r a t us ; a p er e nn ial , Sciro us ped ic ellatus Fern .; and s ev e r a l<br />

per en nial sp e c i es of ~ , mo s t o f wh i c h di d not flower the first year.<br />

Only y e ll ow n utse dg e pr o du c ed t ube r s. The s e s t u d i e s i n d i c a t e that y e ll ow<br />

nuts e dge i n muc k onion f i elds pr odu c es v iable s e e ds which can s urvi ve i n<br />

th e soil . Oth er an nua l a n d perenn i al sedg es are a lso prese nt i n muc k<br />

fi elds and pr oduc e viab l e seeds, but yel low nutse dge is t he mo s t<br />

important sedge weed prob lem . Cur rent s tu d i e s ar e qu an tif yin g t he<br />

viability o f yello w n u t s e dg e see ds co ll ected fr om muck f ie l ds du rin g la t e<br />

summer and f all of 1989 and 1990.


90<br />

PREEMERGENCE WEED CONTROL IN NEW YORK MUCK ONIONS<br />

L.A. Elle rbrock and A. W. wee 'tma n'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

On- f arm experiments a t f iv e locations in New York in 1990<br />

involve d e va l uat i on of pendimethalin, propachlor, me to lachlo r ,<br />

and bromixy ni l for early season weed cont rol in muck onions<br />

(Alliu m ~ L.) . Treatments were eva luated for wee d control a nd<br />

effec t on on ion stands, early onio n growt h , a nd bulb y ie ld .<br />

Preemerge nc e pendimethalin at 2 .2 to 4.4 kg ha' r e du c e d sta nd,<br />

e ar l y gr owt h, and yie ld in on e e xp er i me nt when a ppli c at i on was<br />

f ol l owed by heavy rain a nd ve ry wet soil condit ion s. A simila r<br />

app l ica t i on in another expe r ime nt did not cause oni on inj ury.<br />

Ea rl y postemerge nc e pen dime th a l i n at 2.2 to 4 .4 kg ha' had li t tle<br />

or no e f f e c t on onion grow t h , and we ed cont ro l was goo d in a ll<br />

f i ve lo c a tions . Preeme rge nc e prop ach l or at 6 . 6 kg ne -' + ea rl y<br />

po s t eme r ge nc e pen di me t ha li n at 2.2 kg ha" re duce d early on ion<br />

grow t h in one of th r e e l oc a t io ns but di d not a ff e c t bul b yield .<br />

Addi t i on of flu a zif op- p-but yl at 0 .2 kg na-' and a non ion ic<br />

s urfa c t a nt to an early pos te mer gence a ppl i c a ti on o f pen d i rne t ha l i n<br />

a t 2.2 kg ha'! d i d not affect oni on gr owth . Onion bulb yie ld was<br />

not a ffect e d by ear ly posternerg enc e metolachlor a t 2 .2 kg ha - t in<br />

two l oc ati ons , but metolachl or a t 3 .3 kg ha -I di d red uc e yie ld in<br />

one loca tion , whereas weed con trol was only fair. onion stands,<br />

early growth, and bulb yield were no t affected by e a rl y<br />

pos t e merg e nce applications of from 0.3 to 0.4 kg ha -I bromoxyni l<br />

no r by ea r l y postemergence app lica tions of from 0.1 to 0.4 kg ha'<br />

bromox ynil + pendamethalin at 2.2 kg ha ", Early pos temergence<br />

applications of bromoxynil at relatively low rat e s gave variable<br />

leve ls of weed control. Prostrate spurge control was excellent<br />

i n one c a s e , whereas control of sh e pher ds pur s e a nd other mustard<br />

spec ies was poor.<br />

As sociate Professor a nd Research Techni cian, Depa rtment<br />

of Fruit and Vegetable <strong>Science</strong> , Corne l l Unive rsity,<br />

It ha c a , NY 14853


91<br />

l1IE EFFECT OF LIGHT INTENSITY AND WAVELENGTIfTRANSHIITANCE OF PlAST IC<br />

KULCHES ON YEu..oW NUTSEDGE<br />

P . E . Neary<br />

a nd B.A . Ha je k l<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Obs ervations in the fiel d hav e indi cated t ha t yello w nut s edge i s capable of<br />

pen etrat i ng bla ck pla st i c mulc h . Onc e abov e t he mulc h th e nu t s ed g e can ben efi t<br />

fr om the s oil war mi ng p r ovid ed by t he mulch a nd f ul l su nli gh t . d e pe ndi ng on th e<br />

c r op c an opy . Yel l ow nu tsed ge do e s not re a dily pen etrat e pla st ic mulch e s th a t<br />

t r ansm it l i ght , i nc lud i n g cl e ar pl as t ic mul c h . I t is hyp o the s i z ed t h a t mulc he s<br />

t ha t t r a ns mi t rela ti vel y s mal l amounts of l i gh t c an su ppres s ye l low n u t sedge by<br />

no t allowing it: t o penetrat e the mul ch and gr ow und er f ul l su nl ig ht . The<br />

o bj ective of t h e 19 90 e xperi men ts wa s to d e t e rmi n e t he eff e ct of 10,,", l igh t<br />

tra n smit t i n g de gra da ble mulc hes and a wa ve l en g t h sel e ctiv e mul ch , th a t tr a n smit s<br />

app r ox ima te ly 50% of t h e s ol a r i n f rar e d ra d i a tion whil e allow in g onl y 20X of<br />

the ph o t os yn t h eti c all y ac t ive ra dia ti on (PAR), on t h e g rowth o f ye l low nu t s ed ge .<br />

The field experimen t included t wo d if f e r e n t cro ps t o d e t erm in e t h e ef f e c t of<br />

crop canopy on potential nutsed g e suppres sion. Th e re s ul t s of t h e g ree nh ous e<br />

study ind icate d th a t pl a st i c mul c h es t r a ns mi t tin g r e l a ti v el y s ma l l a moun t s of<br />

lig h t su p pre sse d y e llow nu t s ed ge gro wt h an d t ub e riz a t i on . The resul t s of th e<br />

f i el d ex pe r i men t ar e s i mil ar t o th e gr e e nhou s e stud y bu t the r e a r e d i ff e r e n c e s<br />

be t ....e e n t he pep pe r a nd melon c r op s , du e to di f f ere nc e s i n cr op ca no py. The<br />

d e gr a da bl e p la s tic mulc h e s ; BL+NT27, XQ·l573 , XQ- l 571 and BL· NVl 5 s up p r es se d<br />

early sea so n nu tsedg e gec ve h c ompar ed t o t he ba r.eg r c u nd and c l e a r pl a s t i c mul ch<br />

i n bo th t he pepp e r s a nd mel on s . Howe ve r, by th e e nd of th e s ea so n, i n th e<br />

pep per s , BL -NT2 7 was the on l y d e grad ab le plast i c mul ch th a t si gnifi c antl y<br />

r educe d nut s ed ge t u ber i z a t i on co mpa re d t o th e bare g r ou nd and cl e ar pl a s ti c mul ch<br />

plo t s. BL· NT27 was s t ill i n ta c t co mpared to t h e o t her d egr a d a bl e s that had<br />

comp let ely degrade d , e a rli e r in th e sea son, a ll owin g su b s e qu ent nutsedge<br />

emergence a nd g r owt h. IRT - 76 p l a s t ic mulc h a lso r ed uced n u ts edg e t uberi za ti on<br />

in th e p epper s. The me l on c an o py wa s much d en s e r t h a n th e pe pper can op y and i t<br />

co ve r ed a gr ea te r port io n of th e pla s t ic mul ched row . BL-NVlS, which was<br />

c ompl et el y d eg rad e d in t h e pe pp er s by th e end o f th e s e a s on , ....a s stil l 80· 90%<br />

int a c t in t he me l ons . Th e r e f or e , BL- NV15 a l ong wi t h BL·NT 27 a nd IRT +76<br />

sign if icant ly suppre s s ed n utse dg e t uber i zati on . Th e r e s ul ts of t h e s e s t udie s<br />

in d ic a t e tha t pl a st ic mul ch e s t ha t t ran s mit s mall a mounts of l i gh t ca n<br />

pot en t ia ll y sup pre s s ye ll ow nu ts ed g e .<br />

l Cl ou c e s t e r Coun t y Ag r ic u ltu r a l Ag ent, Ru tger s Coop erati v e Ex t ension , Cl a y t on ,<br />

NJ 0831 2 and Ass oci at e Prof e s s or , De pt. o f So ils and Crop s, Rut gers Univer s ity .<br />

Brid ge t on , NJ 083 0 2


92<br />

son. FUMIGANTS AND HERBI CIDES FOR WEED CONTR OL<br />

UNDER CLEAR PLASTIC MULCH IN VEGETABLE CROP S<br />

B. A. Majek and P. E. Neary'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The influen ce of clear plasti c mulch on th e emerge nce of ten summer<br />

annu al weeds was eva luated in 1989 and 1990. The po p ulati on of nin e<br />

weed s was aff ected by the mulch in at least one of th e two years. Lar ge<br />

cra b gras s. giant fo xtail, common p urs lane . bam yardgrass , and fall pa ni cu m<br />

pop ulati ons were high er un de r the mulc h . Common ragw eed, ve lvetleaf,<br />

and common lambsquart er popu latio ns were lower under th e mulch tha n in<br />

tille d so il. Pen n sy lvania smart weed pop u lation s were unaffe cted by the<br />

mulch . Smooth pigwe ed popul ation s were dec rease d th e fi r s t yea r an d<br />

in cre ased th e s eco nd year of th e expe rime nt . Melons an d eggpla n t s<br />

res po n ded to transp lanti ng thro ugh cl ea r pl asti c mu lch wi th high e r ea r ly<br />

yi elds an d high er tot al yield s wh en weed s we re contro lled unde r t he mulch.<br />

Oxyflu orf en or clomazone band ed un der th e mu lch before tra ns p lan ti ng at<br />

0. 44 kg/ ha or 0 . 55 kg/ha , res pec tive ly , effective ly cont ro lle d all th e annual<br />

weeds un der the clear p lasti c mulch . Neither he r bici de ca use d inju ry t o<br />

either crop . Metha rn inje cted into th e t ri ckl e ir ri gati on syste m or 1, 3­<br />

di chloropr opene p lu s chloro pic rin shank ed into the so il immediat ely bef ore<br />

th e p lastic was laid also effecti vely contro lled the weeds , b ut t he<br />

fu migant s were less cons iste n t. Metha m did not reac h the edges of the<br />

pl asti c, whi ch re sulte d in some wee d gro wt h that was roo ted where th e<br />

tr ick le ir ri ga tion did not wet. Appli cation p robl ems redu ced the<br />

eff ectiv enes s of the l, 3-di chl orop rop ene p lu s chloro p icri n tre a tmen t in<br />

1990 .<br />

\ Assoc. Prof., Ru tgers Univ ., Bri dgeton, NJ 08302 -9499 an d Agr.<br />

Agent , Glou ce ste r County, Clayton , NJ 08312-1 095


93<br />

RESPONSE OF CUCUMBERS , SNAP BBANS , AND WEEDS TO RYE ALLELOCHE.MICALS AND<br />

SPRI NG- PLANTED COVER CROPS<br />

W.R. Chas e, A. R. Putnam , and 8. H. zandst ra 1<br />

Thre e a lle lochemi ca ls bel ieved to be re l ealled from t he br eakdown of<br />

rye , 2, 4 - dihyd roxy - l , 4 (2K) - beneoxaeLn - a -cne (01 8011.) , 2 (3H ) ­<br />

ben zo xa zo l i no ne (BOA) , and 2. 2 ' - o xo -1, l ' -az o ben zen e IAZOS) we r e assay e d<br />

for t oxicit y on c uc umbe r (~ eat ivus L .), sn ap bean (~<br />

~ L .), bar nyar dq r a s s (~~ (L.) aeeu v , ) a nd<br />

ga rden c r e s s (~ ~ L.) . In gen e r al, plant -der i ved DIB Oll. a nd<br />

BOA wer e mo re toxic t o th e crops t han AZOB. I n cont r a st , th e<br />

microb i a lly -pr od uced AZOB was mor e to xic t o bar nya rdg r a ss t h a n to t he<br />

crops . Combinations o f al l e l oc he mi c a ls c aus e d eithe r antagonist ic or<br />

synergis ti c responses depend ing on the indicato r epe e Le e an d rate of<br />

application . The be8t s ce na r i o for good. weed. control with minimal cr op<br />

i n jur y would be the rapid co nvers i on of DlBOA/BOA t o AZOB.<br />

Spring -planted co ver crops were evaluated tor th ei r ability to<br />

reduce weed populations i n cu cumber and snap bean dur ing the 1988 - 199 0<br />

seasons. Oat (~sativa L .l , spr ing b ar l e y (~~ L .) and<br />

ry e (Secal e ~ L. ) were killed wi t h g l yphosate and compared to ba re<br />

9round an d a poplar exc e lsior (~~ Michx . J mulch. In<br />

a l l y e ars , po p lar e xcel s i o r r edu ced we e d biomas s b y 23 - 30 \ a t 42 d a y s<br />

a fte r seeding th e ve getab le s, c ompared to bare ground . Spr i ng -pl ant ed<br />

cover c r op s r e d uc e d weed bio ma ss by up to 78 \. Cove r c r op s de layed<br />

emergence an d matu r i t y o f t he vegetab le cr op s , bu t tot a l y i e l d 8 wer e not<br />

reduced .<br />

lR &sea rch As s oc . a nd Profs., Dep. of Horticult ure , Michigan Stat e<br />

Uni versity, East Lansing , MI 48 824


94<br />

RESPONSE OF THREE GRASS SPECIESTO FALL APPLIED BRUSH CONTROL TREATME1"ITS<br />

Gregory T . Lyman. Larry J. Kuhns . and Arthur E. Cov er ll<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

InjUl')'to underslory grUICS from fall applied brush wnllol lJutmmU has bun • major concern 10 Pennsylvania<br />

roadside managers , An experiment was conducted to compare the effects of several brush control treatments on tall fescue<br />

~~S c hr eb.), red fescue


95<br />

TABLE 1: InjW')' ratingsand percentcover for hardfescue.redfescue.and tall fescue treated on Sept. 7, 1989.<br />

Injuryratings on May 31, 1990 wereon a scale from1-10 with a "1"indicatinggreen, vigcrousturf, a "10"<br />

indicatin 5 bein unaccenr"blef orroadsidelurf. Percent cover was visuaJ]v rated on Oct. 7 1990.<br />

Han:IFescue I. RedFescue I Tal l Fescue<br />

5{3 1f}() lonl9O 513190 tonl9O 5/31/90 10{/ fJ(j<br />

Treatment \J1la Annlication Rate Iniurv Cover Iniurv Cover Iniurv CO\ 'CT<br />

..... (1-10) ( "' ) (1-10) ("') (1-10) ( "' I<br />

Fosamine ammonium(FA) [2aO} 8.96 7.7 4 1 3.3 97 3.3 100<br />

FA (560} 8.96 6.0 77 3.0 100 4.0 100<br />

FA [840j 8.96 '.7 93 6.0 100 4.0 100<br />

FA + CideKickl/ (280) 8.96 ' .3 '7 2_3 80 2.3 100<br />

FA ...CideKick (560) 8.96 7.3 60 3.7 100 2.3 97<br />

FA+ CideKick (&40J 8.96 6.7 73 4.7 97 2.7 100<br />

Imazapyr [560]21 0.Q35 4 .7 100 4.7 97 2.7 100<br />

lmazapyr 0.07 6.3 90 3.0 100 4.7 100<br />

1m""""<br />

0.105 9.0 SO ,.3 93 6.0 100<br />

MetsulfW'On methyl (MSM) 0.021 2.3 97 2.3 100 2.0 100<br />

MSM 0.042 2.0 100 2.0 100 4.0 93<br />

Triclopyrcster(I'E) 4 .48 2.3 97 1.3 100 2.3 97<br />

FA + lmazapyr 6.72 + 0.035 6.7 80 3.7 97 3.7 100<br />

FA + Imazapyr 6.72 + 0.07 7.0 33 ' .7 77 7.0 77<br />

FA+ MSM 6.72 ... 0.042 3.3 93 4.7 100 2.0 100<br />

FA+TE 6.72 + 0.56 '.0 77 4.3 100 1.3 97<br />

FA + Imazapyr+ MSM 6.72 + 0.035+ 0.042 8.3 67 '. 0 100 8.3 77<br />

FA + TE+ MSM 6.72 + 0.56 + 0.021 3.0 93 2.0 100 1.3 100<br />

CidclGck O.50%v/v 2.7 73 2.7 87 2 .0 100<br />

Clean CUI+ Pine 31 0.50%v/v 4.0 100 3.3 97 4.0 100<br />

L.5.D.rP=O.05 2 .6 32 25 19 2.4 rs<br />

1/Cidckick sprayadjuvant,addedat 0.25%vtv,JLB International, vcroBeach,a .<br />

21Thecarriervolumefortheremainingtreatments was560 1Iha.<br />

3/ CleanCut plus Pine spray oil adjuvant, Arborchem Products Inc., Fon Washington, PA.


96<br />

LOW-VOLUME BACKPACK APPLICATION OF GLYPH OSATE FOR BRUSH CONTROL<br />

J . L. Wilhm, J. S . Gabric and H. W. Caldwell<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Aqueous spray solutions containing 5% a nd 10% Vjv<br />

co nce ntr ations of glyphosate2 he rbicide wi t h 1 . 5% vIv of a<br />

non-ion i c surfac tan tJ were applied through a backpack spra yer to<br />

sma ll «1 5 ft . ) br ush. The noz z l e used was e ither an ad jus table<br />

s t ra i g ht-s t ream noz z l e or a s p r ayi ng Sys t e ms TXVS-6 Cone j e t R<br />

no zzle modi f i e d to s pra y a s t r a i ght strea m. Appli c ations wer e<br />

ma de by spr a y in g th e fo lia ge in a l at e r al zig- za g motion from th e<br />

to p to th e bo ttom of the p la nt be in g spray e d. App ro xim a t ely 50%<br />

of th e f o l i a ge i s c ontac ted, bu t no t soa ked as th is is a<br />

low -v o l ume app lic a t ion. In smal l , open b ranched trees,<br />

appl i ca tions need only be made t o one side. In thick foliage or<br />

mul t iple stem roo t sprouts, applications mus t be made from seve ral<br />

sides to ensure ad equate spray cove rage . Spray volume per acre<br />

will va ry with density, but have typically ranged f rom 10 t o 25<br />

gallo ns per acre.<br />

For most species sprayed, there was no difference in<br />

cont rol be tween t h e 5 % and 10% v/v co nce nt ra tion rates . However,<br />

s ympt oms appeared more qu LckLy o n man y sp ec i es wit h t he hi gh e r<br />

rate . Spec ies co nt ro lled by the 5% v/v ra t e incl ude sa s safrass<br />

(Sas sa f rass alb id um) , b lack lo c u s t (Rob i n ia ps eu d oa ca c ia), ch e rr y<br />

(Pru nus s er oti na ) , r ed mapl e (Ac e r r ubra) , re d a nd whi te oak<br />

(Que r c u s r ub r a a nd Q. a lba) , ye l low pop la r ( Li r iode nd ro n<br />

tUl i p i fe ra) , s umac (Rhus spp .), r e dbu d (Ce rcis can adensi s),<br />

syc amore (P latan us occidental is), a nd swee tgum (Liquidambar<br />

s ty ra c i f lua). Te n pe rcent v/v concentra tions were needed to<br />

con trol shagbark h i c k or y (Carya ovata) a nd Eas t e rn red ce dar<br />

(Jun iper us virginiana) . Variab le results were seen wi th both<br />

rates on mulberry (Morus epp . ) and American elm (Ulmus americana ).<br />

One po ss i ble explanation for poor American elm cont rol may be that<br />

t he small leaves o f this specie s may have p revented sufficient<br />

spray coverage of t he low -volum e spray .<br />

Th i s type of applicat ion may be pre f erable to h igh -volume<br />

ha ndgun applica ti o ns in lo w-br u s h d en s it y s i t ua tions , in rough<br />

t e rrain, i n resi d e ntial areas , or in e nv i ro nmental ly s ensit i v e<br />

areas . sin c e th e ap p l i c at i on is sp e c i fic to b ru sh, des i rab le<br />

und ers t ory i s mai nta ine d and ob je c t iona b le brown o ut can be<br />

avo i d e d . Th i s t e c hn i qu e also o f f ers a n al t er n a tive t o s ummer<br />

basal ap p licatio ns s ince t he s tr a i ght s trea m nozzle enab l es qu i c k<br />

applic a tions standing away from th e s tem r at her tha n nex t t o it.<br />

1 Prod uc t Development Associate I, Sales Represe ntative I I I, and<br />

Senior Sales Specialist . Monsanto company. 11550 North Meridian<br />

St r e e t , suite 200 . Cannel , IN 46032<br />

2 Acco rdR, Mon s a nt o<br />

3 X-77 R spreader , Valent corpora t io n


97<br />

A COMPARI SON OF SEVERAL DlLUENTS USED BAS AL BARK HE RBICIDE<br />

APPLiCATIONS TO CONTROL ASH AND BIRCH<br />

Gregory T. Lyman, Larry J. Kuhns. and Arthur E. Govert /<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In recent years, seve ral dilue nts have beco me available for use in basal bark applica tions as an<br />

alternative to diesel fuel or kerosene. In this study diesel fuel, two comme rcially used prod ucts<br />

(Basal o u v and Rile Way31), a vegetab le oil (Soy-Dex'"), and a para ffin ba sed petrol eum oil<br />

(Penetrato rv ) were evaluated for their co ntrol of green ash (frnx inus oe nsy lvanjca Mar sh.), and<br />

black birch a.k!Y.lil krilll L.) when used a carrie r for triclopyr. Naturally growi ng stands of ash<br />

andbirc h with stem cali pers ranging from 2.54 em to 1O.I6cm were selected for treatmen t, A<br />

solution of 20% Garlon 461and 80% diluent was used for each of the five dilue nts. Eac h dilue nt<br />

was appli ed at two rates; 1.0 and 2.0 ml solution per 2.54 em stem circ umference. Twe nty stems<br />

were utilized for eac h treatme nt and they were arranged in a randomized comp lete block des ign. In<br />

early April 1989, the diame ter of each stem was measured and recorded, circumf erence was<br />

determin ed , and the approp riate dose was ca lculated. The solution was applied evenly arou nd the<br />

stem at a height of 30-40 cm using a hypodermi c needle and syringe to co ntrol accuracy. In<br />

September 1989 and 1990, each stem was rated for control on a scale of 0-5 with a "0" being no<br />

treatment effec t and a "5" indic ating no visible living tissue.<br />

The da ta for stem size wasanalyzedand there was no significant difference in size between the<br />

treatment s for eac h spec ies. The means for injury rating at eac h ratin g da te are repo rted in Tab le 1.<br />

In 1989, ash control with Soy-Dex was significantly lower than all other treat men ts. Vinual ly<br />

complete co ntrol was achieved with dies el fuel, Basa l Oil , Rite Way, or Penetraror. There was no<br />

differen ce in contro l for these prod ucts at either rate . By 1990, contro l prov ided by the low rate of<br />

Soy-Dex had decrea sed and was significantlly different than all other trea tments. Injury ratings for<br />

the high rate of Soy-Dex increased slightly and were not statistical ly differe nt than the other<br />

diluents . Contro l provided by diese l fuel, Basal Oil , Rite Wa y, and Penetrator did not change from<br />

1989 (0 1990 .<br />

Control of birch was variab le between treatments and rates in 1989. The low rate of all<br />

diluents provided poorer control rati ngs when compared to the high rate , yet the only difference<br />

that showed significance was between the rates of Soy-Dex. The low rate of Rite Way was<br />

significantly better than the low rate of Basal Oil, Soy-Dex, and Penetrator, but not diesel fuel.<br />

The low rates of diese l fuel and Rite Way were not significantly differe nt than the high rates of any<br />

diluent, Th e only signific ant differe nce between the high rates was between diesel fuel andSoy ­<br />

Dex . By 1990 the low rate of Soy-Dex was not differe nt than the low rate of Basal Oil or<br />

Penetraror , bu t was significantly lower tha n all other treatments. All othe r diluents and rates were<br />

not different from each other.<br />

Initially, birc h control levels were lower than ash in 1989, but mo st treatme nts were similar by<br />

1990. In both speci es, the I ml solution/2.5 em circumfere nce rate was the mos t cost effi cient.<br />

Scy -Dex was the onl y diluent that was inferior to diese l fuel. All other diluems provided the same<br />

level of control when compared to die sel fuel. None of the diluents were supe rior to diese l fuel.<br />

By having no difference in efficacy . vegeta tion ma nagers can consider other attributes of these<br />

diluents when makin g a control strategy for these two spec ies.<br />

1/ Proj ec t Assistant, Professor of Omame mal Horticulture , and Sr. Researc h Technologi st,<br />

res pecti vely, The Pennsy lvania State University, Univers ity Park, PA 16802<br />

2/ Basal Oil , Arborc hem Produ cts, Inc ., Fo rt Wa shington, PA<br />

31 Rite W ay, N.G. Gilbert Corpo ratio n. Muncie, IN<br />

4/ Soy-De x vege table oil adj uvant, Helena Chemical Co., Memphis. TN<br />

51 Penerra tor non-io nic spray adj uvant, Helena Chemical Co., Memphi s, TN<br />

61 Gar lon 4 herbic ide, an emul sifiable co ncentrate conta ining 480 gil triclopyr.


98<br />

TABLE 1: Mean injury rating s to green ash and black birch treated in April 1989 with a 20%<br />

solution of Garlon 4 11in five diluents, and evaluated September 1989and August and September<br />

1990. Injury was rated on a 0 to 5 scale. with "0" being no treatmen t effect, and a "5" indicating<br />

death of the stem. Each value is the me an of 20 ob servation s.<br />

InjUry Ratin gs<br />

ml solution! 2.5 em Green Ash Black Birch<br />

Diluent stem circumference 9/89 8190 9/89 9190<br />

(-- - ------------------- 0-5 ---- ---)<br />

Diesel Fuel 1.0 5.0 5.0 3.8 4.9<br />

Diesel Fuel 2.0 5.0 5.0 4.6 5.0<br />

BasalOil U 1.0 5.0 5.0 2.6 4.4<br />

Basal Oil 2.0 5.0 5.0 3.5 4.8<br />

RiteW ay3f 1.0 4.8 4.8 4.3 5.0<br />

Rite Way 2.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.9<br />

Soy-Dex" 1.0 4.0 3.6 1.9 3.6<br />

Soy-Dex 2.0 4.0 4.3 3.3 4.3<br />

Penerratorv 1.0 4.8 4.8 3.0 4.6<br />

Penetra tor 2.0 4.8 4.9 3.8 4.9<br />

L.S.D. (p=0.05) 0.9 1.2<br />

1/Garlon 4 is an emul sifiable concentrat e containin g the acid equivalent of 480 gil tric1opyr,<br />

Do wElan co , Ind ian apoli s, IN.<br />

1) Basal Oil, Arbo rchem Prod ucts, Inc ., Fort W ashington , PA.<br />

3/ Rite Way , N.G . Gil bert Corporation , Muncie, IN.<br />

4/ Soy-Dex vegetab le oil adjuvan t, Helena Chemical Co., Memp his, TN.<br />

5/ Penerra tor non-ioni c spray adjuvant, Helena Chem ical Co., Memphi s, TN.


99<br />

USB OF COVER CROPS IN LOW-INPUT nE D MANAGEMENT SYST EMS<br />

FOR CORN PRODUCTION<br />

J oh n R. Teasda le 1<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The objec t ive of th i s r e se ar ch is t he deve lopment of weed<br />

management sys tems for no- t illag e c orn produc tion t hat r e du ce<br />

herbicide and n i trogen inputs . Res e a r c h emphasis has been p l a c ed<br />

on a nnu al l e gu me cover crops be c a u s e of the de monstra ted nitrogen<br />

co ntri buti on to co rn. Th i s report summarizes progres s fro m f ield<br />

exp e ri ment s cond uc ted dur i ng 1988 through 1990.<br />

Residue of h ai ry vet ch (Viola vil losa Rot h ) a nd crim s on<br />

c l ove r (Tr i f olium in ca r natum L.) s uppr e s s e d weed es ta bl is hment<br />

with in the f ir s t mont h af t er c orn pl ant ing in t reatmen ts without<br />

res i dual her bici de . For exam p l e , hairy vet c h residue s uppressed<br />

weed dens i ty ov e r 3 yea rs by a n aver age of 56% co mpared to th e<br />

co ntr ol t r e a t ment . Su f f icient wee ds bec ame established that weed<br />

bi omas s at ta s s e l li ng was sim il a r t o that in co ntrol pl ot s in tw o<br />

out of thr e e yea rs . On the other hand, if hairy vet c h remained<br />

ali ve until nat ural se ne sce nc e in June, weed densit y was<br />

suppressed by 88% a nd weed biomass a t t a s s e lling was r e du c e d by<br />

61%. Pla nting corn in 38 c m rath er tha n 76 cm r ows and dou ble<br />

rath e r tha n c onven tio na l dens i t y i mproved weed contro l f or<br />

sel e cte d c ove r cr op t rea tme nts. However , no co ver crop tre a tment<br />

wit hout herb ici de has provide d weed co nt r ol a s effective or a s<br />

c onsi s tent as tha t prov ided by h erbicides .<br />

Cov er crops , in some ins t a nces , have interfer ed with corn<br />

pro du ctio n. Hai r y ve t ch a nd crim son clo ver re sidue de cre ased<br />

corn stand by 32% an d 12%, r especti vely, dur in g a seaso n wit h<br />

cool, wet con dition s f or c or n germinat ion. Li ve, unmanage d ha i r y<br />

vet ch sev e r el y in hib i ted ear ly corn deve lopment a nd resul ted in<br />

an 87% y ie ld reduct ion du r i ng a se a so n i n wh i c h v e t c h growth<br />

ext e nded unt il late Jun e . Alth oug h li ve hairy ve tc h provided<br />

i mpr oved weed control compa re d t o ki l l ed hairy vet ch , so me<br />

manageme nt with pos teme rgence herb i cides may be necessary t o<br />

pre vent e xc e ss i v e inter ference wi t h c or n.<br />

Cor n y iel ds f r om tr e at ments with cover crops and/or narrow<br />

r ow s pac i ng but with out herbic ides were not s i gn if ica nt l y<br />

differen t th a n y ield of th e standa r d herbicide t r e a t ment in a<br />

year wi t h l ow weed compe t i t io n but were s ignificantly lower in a<br />

ye a r wit h h i gh weed compe ti tion . However , treat ments wh i c h<br />

comb i ned herb icides at re duced r at e s wi t h cov e r crops an d/or<br />

nar r ow r ow spacing cons istently y iel ded a s we l l as the standard<br />

herb i c i de t r e a t me nt . The s e results suggest that cov e r crops will<br />

ne ed t o be in teg r ated wi t h some herbicide tec hno logy t o ac hieve<br />

con si stent no-till a ge c or n produ ction.<br />

' Pla nt Physio l., USDA-ARS , Bel t sville, MD 20 705 .


100<br />

<strong>Weed</strong> Control and Cover Crop Managemen t<br />

for Ridge-Till Com<br />

Frank Webb and Mark Causey'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Field experiments were conducted in 1989 and 1990 at George town, Delaware with<br />

different herbicides and rates across three cover crop variab les, rye (~~ L.),<br />

crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) and volunteer cover in ridge-t ill corn (Zea<br />

!I!ll,}§ L.). The statistical design was a split-plot arrangement of a randomized complete<br />

block design. All plots received two ridge cultivations with a standard ridge-till<br />

cultivator. In both years the rye cover interfered with the cultivation process because of<br />

the large amount of cover crop residue. Visual nitrogen deficiency was evident in tbe<br />

rye cover plots with a total of 102 lbs of chentical nitrogen applied to all plots. All<br />

herbicide tre atments yielded significantly higher (Table 1) than the no herbicide plots<br />

for both years. The rye cover plots yielded significantly less than the other covers where<br />

no burndownherbicide was used even in combinationwith one x rate of atrazine,<br />

metolachlor and 2,4-D applied preemergence for both years due to growth competition<br />

with the crop. There were no significant differences between weed control ratings or<br />

corn yield with one-half x rates of soil residualherbicides as compared to one x rates.<br />

In 1990 crimson clover plots, in combination with any herbicide treatment, produced<br />

higher yields than the other covers as a result of a noticeable nitrogen deficiency<br />

occurringin the study.<br />

'Extension Specialist, <strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, University of Delaware<br />

Extension Associate, <strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, University of Delaware


Table 1. Herbicide and CoverCrop Response in Ridge-Till Cora 101<br />

1989 1<br />

-'LI2 -'LI2 WJ. ..2LlL ..2LlL .ill.- .2LlL W1 U.!.!.<br />

Lg,<br />

"-<br />

Rate Cover M~~ Crab- Commoo YlCld "~b- Commoo Ceab- Yickl<br />

Ir=ou.ll lllIA Kill..... lIil ~ IJlllim !>ill I!!J:l=l sass h!!.bm<br />

RyeCover<br />

"'"<br />

99. 90. no<br />

Bicep 2.25 80.0 ,5< 62.5 TI3 UU 1OJ.<br />

2,4.D E 25<br />

C.Clo.... er<br />

Bicep ' 2S no 35.0 92.5 923 140.1 98. 96.5 875 " d<br />

2,4-0 E 25<br />

NO CO'o'eT<br />

Bicep 2.25 55.0 ,0.0 86.0 89. 126.0 955 8S. 875 116.9<br />

2,4·D E .2S<br />

1"0 cover<br />

Bicep 1.13 '25 ,0.0<br />

2,4-D E .2S<br />

84. 75.0 1333 88.5 82.5 825 ' ''' 5<br />

C CIo''CT<br />

Bicep 1.13 60.0 .en 78.8 -na 1.30' 9 1. 875 8S. ll 8.3<br />

2,4-0 E 25<br />

Rye Cover<br />

Bicep 1.13 82.5 30.0 SO.O 513 lOS. 923 8S. no 103.7<br />

2,4-D E 25<br />

Rye Cover<br />

HonchO .7S 84.8 845 863 89.8 131.5 99.0 88.8 83.8 101.3<br />

Bicep 1.13<br />

s-n 1.00<br />

c.ce -«<br />

Honcho .7S 89.8 99.0 93.8 90.0 133.0 94.8 88. 863 119.3<br />

Bicep 1.13<br />

x-n 1.00<br />

No Co\-er<br />

Honcho .7S 885 .895 93.8 90.0 141.0 923 88. 863 1103<br />

Bicep 1.13<br />

x-rt 1.00<br />

No CO\'er<br />

Gramoxone 38<br />

x-n .2S<br />

99. 99. 96.0 913 134.7 923 8S. 863 100.2<br />

Bicep 1.13<br />

C. CIovcr<br />

Gramoxone .38 99. 99. 925 92.5 132.2 96. 825 80. 118.7<br />

x·n 25<br />

Bicep 1.13<br />

Ryeccver<br />

Gramoxonc 38 99.0 99. 63.8 70.0 116.4 98' 895 82.5 97.1<br />

x.n .2S<br />

Bicep 1.13<br />

NoCo vcr 0 0 0 0 0 73.7 0 0 525<br />

No Herb.<br />

C.CIo-.'er 0<br />

"'.<br />

0 0 0 .>1 225 0 625 23 .1<br />

No Herb.<br />

Rye Cover 0 225 0 0 0 39.4 55. 0 463 285<br />

No Her b.<br />

LSD(.OS) 22.1 215 10 . 135 ain 213 12Jl 121 .8.0<br />

""


102<br />

Biological and Economic Analysis of Ridge Tillage in Corn and Soybeans<br />

B.H. Marose', M. Heller , T.e . Harris. and Y.M. Kibler<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The technique of planting and cultiv ating crops on ridges was first developed more than thirty<br />

years ago as a soil and water conservation practice in me Mid-west. Today. there is renewed interest in<br />

ridge tillageas a meansof reducing the economic andenvironmentalcosts associated with heavy reliance<br />

upon herbicides.<br />

In 1988 a six year proj ect was initiated to evaluate ridge tillage in comparison to no-tillage and<br />

conventional tillage systems for a typical corn-soybean rotation under mid-Atlantic coastal plain<br />

conditions . The experiment focuses on the economics of production and on the long term changes in<br />

weed species and density resulting from substituting varying degrees of tillage for some herbi cide inputs.<br />

A ninet een treatm ent experiment was established at the Chesapeake Bay Foundation's Claggett<br />

Farm in Upper Marlboro, Maryland on a silt loam so il. The 20' by 70' plots were arranged in a<br />

randomized complete block design with three replications. Plots were estab lished using full size farm<br />

equip ment including a Buffalo ridge tillage plamer-culn vator and no-tillag e cultivato r.<br />

The six ridge tillage, four no-tillage, and six conventional tillage treatments were selected to allow<br />

comparisons within and between tillage systems, between primary and secondary tillage operations, and<br />

between banded and broadcast herbicide placement. In addition to the fixed treatments, one variable<br />

treatment for each tillage system allows annual modifications in selection and timing of herb icides and<br />

secondary tillage pra ctices . The variable treatments reflect a best management approach to minimizing<br />

inputs and maximizing returns as weed problems change over time.<br />

<strong>Weed</strong> counts, weed and crop biomass, and crop yield data are collected and analyzed by analysis<br />

of variance using a RCB model. An F-LSD (p= .05) is used for general treatment comparisons with<br />

contras ts calculated for specific planned comparisons . Corr elations are run between weed count, biomass,<br />

and yield data . Econo mic analysis is conducted to compare differences among the nineteen rrearments.<br />

The budget model used to assess profitability takes into account variab le costs, equipment costs , farm<br />

size , and equipment age.<br />

In 1988 and 1989 corn yields from ridge tillage plots were compar able to no-tillage and<br />

conventional tillage plots with standard management pr actices. <strong>Weed</strong> control in ridge tillage was good<br />

in most ridge tillage plots. Only in the no herbicide plots did mom tngglor ies become a problem within<br />

the row. Tr eatments involving tillage had greater numbers of hcr senettle, but lower overall biomass.<br />

The var iable costs of prod uction, such as herbicide, fuel, and labor , tended to be lower for ridge tillage<br />

than for conventional or no-tillage.<br />

I (PM Coordinator, Univ. of MD, College Park, MD 20742<br />

~ Farm Manager , Chesapeake Bay Foundatio n, Upper Marlboro, MD 20772<br />

) Statistician and Econo mist, USEP A, Washi ngton, DC 20460


103<br />

Table I . T illage and herb icide treatm ents used in the biological and economic analysis of ridge tillage<br />

in com and soybeans.<br />

PRIMA RY HERBICIDE SECONDARY TILLA GE<br />

TILLAGE<br />

Ridge Broadcast - Pre Ridge + Ridge<br />

Ridge Broadcast . Pre + Post Ridge + Ridge<br />

Ridge Banded - Pre Ridge + Rid ge<br />

Ridge Banded - Pre + Broadcast - Post Rid ge + Ridge<br />

Ridge Variable Variable<br />

Ridg e None Rotary Hoe + Ridge + Ridge<br />

Ridge None Ridge + Ridge<br />

No-Tillage Broadcast - Pre None<br />

No-Ti llage Broadcast - Pre No-till Culti vator<br />

No-Till age Broadcast - Pre + Broadcast - Post None<br />

No-Tillage Variabl e Variable<br />

No-Tillage None None<br />

Conventional Broadcast - Pre None<br />

Conv entional Broadcast - Pre Cultivate + Cultivate<br />

Conventional Broadcast - Pre + Broadcast· Post None<br />

Conventional Variable Vari able<br />

Conventional Banded - Pre Cultivate + Cultivate<br />

Conventional None None<br />

Conventional None Rotary Hoe + Cultivate +<br />

Cultivate


104<br />

EFFECTS<br />

OF A LEGUME NI TROGEN SOURCE ON COMPETITION<br />

BETWEEN CORN AND LAMBSQUARTERS<br />

E. Oyck and M. L i ebman 1<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A two-year fie ld study was u nde rt a ke n to compare the effec ts<br />

of n i tr oge n source (legume resid ue VB. synthet ic ni trogen<br />

fe r t i l ize r) on competition between swee t corn (~~ L . ' s u ga r<br />

Buns I ) a nd l ambsquarters (Chenopodium a lbum L . ) . Plots of c rim son<br />

clove r (Tr ifolium incarnatum L .) were seeded in t h e spr ing and<br />

af ter 1 0 we e k s gro wt h we r e mown and the residu e sha l low ly<br />

in c or p orated. Sweet corn was p lan ted in these p lots as we l l as<br />

i nt o p l ots fer tilized with ammonium ni trate at r ates of 0, 45, 90,<br />

135, or 180 kg N/ ha . Th e corn rows i n ha lf o f each p lot were also<br />

seeded with l ambs qu a r t e r s . Corn and weeds were then thinned t o<br />

equa l de nsities in all p lots . Samples of corn and weeds were taken<br />

every t wo weeks to assess aboveground biomass and t i s s u e ni trogen<br />

content . To de termine patter ns of ni t rogen a v a i l a b i l i t y , soil<br />

samp les were also periodical ly taken f ro m each plot .<br />

I n 1989 , at tw o we e ks after corn emergence, lambsquarter<br />

b iomas s i n t h e p lot s treated with cr imson c lover averaged 70% less<br />

than that i n 0 N plots. At ha rv e s t (1 0 week s afte r emerge nce),<br />

lambsquarters biomass on c rimson clover plots remained 30% l owe r<br />

th a n t ha t on 0 N or ammonium nitrate plo ts . In contrast , corn gro wn<br />

with leg ume ni trogen under weedy conditions out yielded weedinfes<br />

ted co rn plots t reated with 180 kg N/ha. Ana lysis of 19 90<br />

cor n an d l a mbs qu a r t e r dryweights shows t h e same tre nds i n terms of<br />

sup pressed we e d growth and increased corn yie ld (on weed-infes ted<br />

pl ots ) when the legu me residue treatment i s c ompared to those<br />

ut i li z in g ammonium n i trate .<br />

One poss ib le explanat ion for this d ifferential effect of<br />

n i t rogen source on corn a nd lambsquarters grow th inv o lve s t e mpo r al<br />

avai la bi lity of soi l inorganic nitrogen . In 1989 , plots t r e a t e d<br />

wi th c rimson clover residue contained significant ly l es s p lantav<br />

ail a bl e ni trogen than those treated wi t h ammonium nit rate thro ugh<br />

th e fi r s t six weeks a fter corn e me r ge nc e . The i n it i al h igh levels<br />

o f p lan t-avai lab le N in the so il i n synthetic fe rt i l ize r plots may<br />

f a vor species capable of rapid, early growth and nut r ie nt captu re,<br />

s uch as l a mbs qu a r t er s . On the other hand, a source which releases<br />

ni trogen more slo wl y thr oughout the growing season, e . g., l e gu me<br />

resi due, may benefit suc h crop s as corn tha t exhib it slow i niti a l<br />

gr owt h and a d e l a y e d r equirement for nitrogen .<br />

Res u l ts f rom thi s s t udy suggest that crop rotations involving<br />

l e gu mes may pro vide significant weed s uppress ion benef its i n co rn<br />

c ropp ing syst ems .<br />

1 Graduate Res ea rch Ass istant and Assis tant Professo r,<br />

r e s p e ct i v e l y , su st ainable Agriculture Program, Deering Hal l,<br />

Uni ve rsity of Maine , Orono , ME 04469


105<br />

CROWNVET CH (CORONnLA VARIA I. ) UVlN G MUL CH'S CO!'ITRIBlJTION TO<br />

SUS TAlNABLE AGRICULTURE<br />

N. L. Hartwi g!<br />

Generally agricul ture as practiced today is sustainab le. Th at is not to say change isn't<br />

necessary and certainly desirable when new techno logy comes along that will mak e agric ulture<br />

more efficient, profitable and in harmo ny with theenvironment. Any change based solely on<br />

making agriculture more in harmo ny with the environment without improvemen t in efficiency or<br />

profitability will nor be economic ally sustainable. Crow nveteh used as a living mulch improves<br />

efficie ncy of farmi ng by providing a living ground cover for com, small grain s, forag es and under<br />

the right conditions soybeans. for the control of soil erosion without the need for terraces, narrow<br />

contour strips and large porti ons of the farm planted to sodcrops each year. Profitabili ty is<br />

improved because the fanner has theoptio n of using crownvetcb that when once established<br />

should never need to be planted again instead of the costly building and maintaining of terraces and<br />

nuisance of COntourfarming with its associated short and point rows. Crownv ercb can be<br />

managed by using the same herbicides that are in use today for the above crops withou t fear of<br />

losing it comple tely. It spreads by underground root stocks which allows crown veteh to fill in<br />

when overly suppressed . Since it is a legume, crownvetch fixes nitroge n so it does n't compete<br />

with the crop for nitrogen and may under the right circumstances provide somenitrogen to the<br />

crop . Mos t impo rtan tly, crownvetch works in hann ony with the environmen t by providin g a<br />

living carpet to almost eliminate surface water runoff and theloss of soil, fertilizer and pesticide s to<br />

streams and lakes.<br />

1Prof. of <strong>Weed</strong> Sci., Dept. of Agro nomy, Th e Pennsylvania State Univer sity , Uni vers ity Park,<br />

PA 16802


106<br />

Potential Herbicide Reductio n in Reduced TiUage Potatoes<br />

L.E . Lanfranconi and R.R. Bellinder'<br />

ABSTRACf<br />

Field experiments were conduct ed in 1989 and 1990 to determine the effect of mulch<br />

density and herbicide prog rams on weed suppression and potato (S.2lArrnm~ L.) yield.<br />

Potatoes were planted into rye ~ ~ L.) killed at two timings with 1.1 kg ha-l of<br />

glyphosate to achieve 1200 and 1800 kg ha', and 1850 and 2300 kg ha" in 1989 and 1990,<br />

respecti vely. The weed control programs included conventio nal tillage (CD plus mechanical<br />

cultivation; reduced tillage (RT) with a full (I x) rate of I inuronand metolachlor (1.7 ka ai ha''<br />

each) applied 10 days after planting (OAP) ; RT with a O.67x rate of metribuzin (0. 17 kg ai ha- I)<br />

applied two weeks after hilling; and RT alone. All treatments were hilled five weeks after<br />

planting. In 1989, mulch density had no effect on redroot pigweed~~<br />

L.) and common lambsquarte rs (Chenooodium illm.mL.) population s. In the between- row spaces<br />

redroot pigweed emergence at 2, 4 and 12 weeks after planting (WAP) was significantly greater<br />

where cultivation was used than in undisturbed rye treatmen ts. In the in-row spaces at 4 and 12<br />

WAP redroot pigweed and common lambsquarters responded differently to herbici de rates and<br />

tillage. While reducing tillage decreased com mon lambsquarters populations , redroc t pigweed<br />

popula tions decreased only with increasing herbicide rates. In 1990, in both in-and-between-ro w<br />

spaces redrcot pigweed and common lambsquarters populati ons were significantl y higher in the<br />

cr plots at all timings when compared to the undisturbed rye plots. <strong>Weed</strong> numbe rs 12 WAP<br />

were significantly reduced as a function of mulch density in 1990. Total weed dry weight at 4,<br />

8 and 12 WAP were significantly higher in CT than in RT . In 1989, total and marketab le yields<br />

decreased as mulch density increased. Yields were greates t, at both densities, when the Jx rate<br />

of herbicid es was used. Convention al tillage withou t herbicides and RT with lower herbicide<br />

rates applied after hilling produced equivalent yields. Regardl ess of mulch density, the lowest<br />

yields occurred in the rye mulch system without herbicides. In 1990, mulch densities did not<br />

affec t yields. Total and marketable yields were significantly higher where rye residues were left<br />

undisturbed prio r to hilling than when mechanical cultivation for weed control was used. In<br />

contras t to 1989, the lowest yield in 1990 occurred in cr plus culti vatio n treatmen ts.<br />

'Grad. Student and Assoc . Professor , Department<br />

University, Ithaca, NY 14853.<br />

of Fruit and Vegetabl e <strong>Science</strong>, Corn ell


107<br />

EFFECTS OF MULCHES ON WEED CONTROL AN D PEPPER YI ELD<br />

M.J . El se and F .X . Mangan 1<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

An experime nt wa s c ond u cte d to d etermine th e e f f ect o f mul ch e s<br />

on y ield o f pep pers (~ ll.nD..!.nU!l L . ' Me l od y ' ) a nd gr owth o f<br />

we eds . The effec t of thre e - f oo t wi de strip s of bla c k plasti c<br />

mu l c hes was s t ud ied in sid e-b y-si de b locks in whi ch a stand o f<br />

ha ir y v e tch (Yi.Q..i.a Y.i..l.l2:ill Roth ) a nd rye (~ ~ L .) was<br />

e i t her mowe d a nd left on the s ur f a c e of t he sailor t illed i n.<br />

<strong>Weed</strong>-free t re at ments were inclu d e d so t ha t t he ef fe c t s o f weeds<br />

c ou l d be differ e ntia ted from o th er e f f e c t s of th e mul c hes whic h<br />

co u ld infl uence y ield s . I n t he weed -f ree pl ot s , yi eld s were hi ghe r<br />

and produ ction began ea r lier i n t he s easo n in ti ll ed plo ts a nd i n<br />

plots with bla ck plast ic. Some o f the r ed uct i ons i n yi e ld in th e<br />

no - ti ll t r e atm ent s may have r e su lt e d from diff i culti e s en co unt ered<br />

i n tra nsp l ant ing i nt o un t il l e d soi l , bu t s o il tempe ra ture<br />

d if f e r e nces also s ugg e s t th a t red uce d soi l tem per atur e s in t hes e<br />

plo t s wa s a fac tor. Yi e l ds i n th e unt il led pl ot s i ncrea s e d late r<br />

in t he season . Yie l ds co uld not be c ompa r e d a mong unwee de d<br />

t re at me nt s , because ev en th e mulc hed pl ots had we e d growth whi ch<br />

red uced pepper yields t o nearl y nothi ng . The tw o majo r wee d s pecies<br />

pre sen t were common l a mbsqu a rt e r s (Che nopo d i um Sl.l.bY.mL. ) a nd la r ge<br />

c rabg rass (~ sanguin e] is L .) . Pop ula t ions of t hese wee ds<br />

were in ver s e l y correl a t e d wit h each ot he r , wit h grea ter numbers of<br />

la rg e c rabg rass plan ts bei ng fou nd i n the no - till plo ts and gr e a ter<br />

nu mber s of common lamb squa r ters p l a nts be ing en c ount e r e d i n t he<br />

till ed plots . This exp e rimen t has t hus y i e lded some in te re s ting<br />

eco log ical informa tio n and t he fol lo wi ng obse rva tio ns: t hat<br />

d if f icul ties in no - ti ll vege table t r a ns pl ant in g a nd lo wer s oi l<br />

t emper a t ur e s ude r cov e r c rop mulc hes ma y r e duc e yiel ds i n pep pers ,<br />

and th at we e d c ont r o l mea su r e s in ad d i t i on t o c over cro ps alo ne<br />

may be necessa r y.<br />

Assi st an t Extens i on Specia list and Res e a r ch Ass i s t a nt,<br />

respe ct i vel y, Depar tm ent o f Pl a nt a nd So i l Scien c e s , Un ive r s i ty of<br />

Mass ac huset ts, Amher s t, MA 01003


108<br />

SUBTERRANE AN CLOVER LI VI NG MULCH I N SOHMER SQUASH'<br />

H . waters and R.D. Ilnicki<br />

ABS TRA CT<br />

A second s e a s on of data were col lected for a field study<br />

involvi ng t he use of sub terranea n (s ub) clove r (~<br />

s ub te r raneum L. 'Mt. Barke r' ) as a livin g mulc h for weed cont r ol<br />

i n su mmer squ a s h (~ l2m2Q L. 'se nator' ) . Re su l ts of t he<br />

fir st year of t he study ( 1989) indica ted t hat wh i l e s ubc lov er<br />

con tro lled s ummer annua l weed s as we l l as the conven tiona l<br />

he r b i c i de treatment , it migh t be too compe titive with squash in the<br />

early part of the season . Atte mpts were made i n 1990 to a l leviate<br />

some of the compet it i ve effects of subclover, s o that an acc eptable<br />

squash cr op could be pr odu ced wi t h limited h erbicide inputs .<br />

Tre at ments us e d in 19 89 and a ga i n in 1990 inc l ude d weed - f r e e<br />

(us i ng bensulide and ch lo r ambe n pr e eme r genc e) an d unweeded checks<br />

(both tilled and with no clover pr es en t ) and a f ull s t a nd of mowe d<br />

clover . The remaining treatment s i n 1990 cons i sted of a full stand<br />

of unmowed subclo ver, a nd two t r e at ments designed to reduce in -row<br />

compet it ion from sub c l over with squ ash while ma i nt a i n i ng the weed ­<br />

supp ressing mulch bet we e n rows : unmowe d subclover with 55 em<br />

s tr ips ei ther killed with glypho sate or tilled, an d treated wit h<br />

ben s uli de a nd c h l or ambe n . Squas h wa s hand - s e e ded on J une 5 i nto<br />

rows 1. 8 m apa r t marke d wit h a no-ti ll corn pl anter . Preemergence<br />

her bi ci de s wer e applie d the following day . Sub clove r was alive at<br />

squash pl anting , a nd r e mained s o f or about thr e e weeks .<br />

As in 1989 , su mmer annu al wee d control pr ovided by s Ubc l ov e r<br />

was co mparable to the herbicide - tre at ed check. Unmowed sub clover<br />

resulted in slig htl y l ower weed bi omass t han mowed clover . Full<br />

s tands of bo th mowed a nd unmowed clo ver reduce d squash st a nd,<br />

r etarded e arly s e a so n gr owt h , a nd delaye d harvest , result in g in<br />

lower y i e l ds than t he herbi cide -t r eated che ck (th e highest - yi e lding<br />

trea tment) , over the 25-day ha rve st perio d. Mowed c lo ver wa s<br />

s lightly less c ompetit i ve wi t h sq ua s h in th e e a r l y week s of the<br />

se aso n th an unmowe d c l ov e r , but there wa s no signif ica nt di f f ere nce<br />

be tween f i na l yield s obtained in th e t wo tre atments . Squash p lants<br />

g row n in al l of the su bclover tr eat me nt s pr od uced grea ter<br />

qua nt i ti e s o f f r uit than t he unt r e a t e d ch eck. Among th e subc love r<br />

t r ea tm e nts, yi eld was sig nificant ly improve d when c lover was<br />

removed from t he ro ws, compared to full s ta nd s , whether k illed wit h<br />

glyphos ate or till ed .<br />

2<br />

INJ Agric. Exp . Stn. Pub l i c a ti on No. J - 152 74-1- 90.<br />

2Gr a duat e Asst. a nd Re s . Prof. of <strong>Weed</strong> sci., r espectively , Dept .<br />

of crop science, Rut gers Uni v . , New Bruns wi c k, NJ 08 90 3.


109<br />

Use o f Subterr anea n Clove r a s a Li vi ng Mul ch i n Some Ve ge ta bles I<br />

R. D. Il nic ki, H. Wa t e r s , and A. Enac he 2<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

We have sh own that s ubterrane an cl over (Trifo l ium s u bt e r raneum) or<br />

subclover can be us e d as a l i Vi ng mul ch for ~n trol i n s ev e ra l<br />

agrono mic c ro ps an d we con du ct ed s t ud i e s t h is pa st year to determ in e<br />

wheth er sub clover can be us ed in veg eta ble s .<br />

Ca bba ge (Brassica ~ ca pita ta) an d t omat o (Lyco pers ico n<br />

~ ) t ransp lan t s were s et and s na p be ans (~ vu l garis) wer e<br />

planted in ea r ly spring on beds pr ev i ou sl y s eeded to su bcl ov e r th e s ummer<br />

bef ore . Treatments included mowed and urunowed subclover with or wit hou t<br />

he rbicides applied in a band ov e r marked ro ws prior to trans planti ng or<br />

pla n tin g . Conven tionally-t illed plots wit h herb i c id es se rve d as ch e ck s .<br />

In c a bba ge , mowed and unmowed sub clo ver produce d excellen t con trol of<br />

l ambs qua r t e rs ( Chenop odium albtuD L. ) and pu rslane ( Por t u la ca ~ L.)<br />

with or without h e r bic i de s . Yield was h i ghe s t in mowed sub c lo ver without<br />

herbi cides. Yi el ds we r e l ow whe r e su bc lo ve r wa s not mowed wi th no<br />

improvement f r om he rb i c i de s . Yields were lowest where glyp ho sa te was<br />

used .<br />

Mowed or unmowed s ubc Iov e r wi t h o r wi t hout herbi cide s pro duc ed<br />

excellen t cont ro l of pu rsla ne an d f all pe n tc we (Pa n i curn d i ch o t omifl or um<br />

Michx.) i n tomatoes which was comparaba le to th e conven tion a lly tilled ­<br />

her bici de ch eck . Yield was h i ghe s t where su bcl over was unmowed wit hou t<br />

h er bicide . Mowing , with or wit hou t her bi cide , r esul t ed in l ower yie l ds .<br />

Yie lds wer e lowes t where glyp hosate was use d on both mowed and unmowe d<br />

areas.<br />

Sub clo ver, with and with out ban ded he rbicides, effect ed exce llent<br />

control of pu rslane an d fall pa n ic urn i n s na pbe ans and e qua l t o t he<br />

co nvention a lly t illed herb icide c heck. Glyp hosat e in a band over the row<br />

h ad no detrimental effect as i t did in c a bba ge and tomat oes .<br />

From these s t ud i e s we conclu de th at s ubc love r li vin g mul ch ca n be<br />

used for weed cont rol i n ca bba ge, tomatoe s, and snap be ans .<br />

lNew Jer se y Agri c . Rxp . Station Publication No . J - 15274- 2 -90 .<br />

2Re s. Pr o f . <strong>Weed</strong> Sc ience , Gradua te St ude n t, an d Re s . Ass oc . , r e sp ect iv el y .<br />

Cr op Sci. Dept., Rutgers University, New Jerse y.


110<br />

s ub ter r ane an Clo ver a nd Vetc h Mulc hes f or<br />

Zucch in i Squash a nd Swe et Cor n<br />

C. E. Beste and J . R. Tea sdal e ll<br />

ABSTRAC T<br />

Subterr anean clove r (Trifolium subterraneum L . 'Mt . Barker I )<br />

a nd h a i r y ve t c h


III<br />

EFFECT S OF EARLY -S UMMER MANAGEMENT OF FALL -P LANTED COVER CROPS ON<br />

WEED CONTROL IN BROCCOLI<br />

F . X. Mangan, S . J . Herber t an d G. V. Lit chfie ld '<br />

Field researc h was initiated in 1990 at the University of Massachusetts Research Farm in South<br />

Deerfield to study the effects of a fall-planted cover crop combination for reduction of nitroge n<br />

and herbicide inputs in broccoli (Brassica oteracea var . italicay. There were three cover crop<br />

treatments planted in the fall of 1989: Winter Rye (Seca/e cerea/e) planted in combination with<br />

Hairy vetch (Vida viI/osa) , winter rye alone, and no cover crop. In the spring of 1990 cover<br />

crop co mbinations were either mowed at the surface with the above-ground biomass left on top<br />

of the soil or the cover crops were mowed then incorporated into the soil. Each cover crop and<br />

tillage treatment was combined factorially with 0 and 112 kg/ha nitrogen and the absence or<br />

presence of herbicide. The herbicide DCPA was employed for conventional tillage and no cover<br />

crop treatments, and sethoxydim was used for the no-till vetch-rye and rye alone treatments.<br />

<strong>Weed</strong> pressure in this field was moderate. The mowed rye-vetch cover crop no-till treatments<br />

with and without the use of sethoxydirn provided good weed control and yielded comparable to<br />

tilled treatments with herbicide. The mowed rye no-till treatment also gave good weed control,<br />

but the yields were less than the treatments with the legume. The addition of sethoxydim<br />

provided excellent control of rye plants that had begun to regrow. Nitrogen added from the<br />

inorganic (fertilizer) or organic (legume cover crop) source increased the size of the weeds<br />

compared to treatments that did not receive nitrogen. Harvest maturity was delayed for the notill<br />

treatments compared to conventionally tilled treatments. It is speculated that lower soil<br />

temperatures influencing growth and nitrogen mineralization in the no-till treatments were<br />

responsible for this phenomenon.<br />

I Research Assistant, Professor and Technical Assistant, Dept. of Plant and Soil <strong>Science</strong>s,<br />

Bowditch Hall, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass. 01003


112<br />

FENOXAPR OP AND BENTAZON TANK HI XES IN TURF 1<br />

RICHARD D. ILN ICKI AND ADRIAN J . ENACHE 2<br />

ABST RACT<br />

Fen o xa pr op I a postemer g ence h e rb i ci d e f or t h e contro l of<br />

cr ab gra s ses (~ s PP . ), can not be u s e d sa fely on new ly ­<br />

se eded turf species . In a p r elimi nary s t ud y we ha v e shown t h a t<br />

f e nox a p r op ph y t ot ox ic it y can be all eviat e d b y tan k mixes wi t h<br />

benta zon . We c o nt i nue d thi s r e searc h in 19 90, on a diff erent site,<br />

to determine whe ther this co mbi nati on would alleviat e th e<br />

phy to tox ic e ffect of f e noxa p rop on new ly-se eded tu r f gr a s s es o n<br />

d iffe ren t soil and climatic condit ions .<br />

Thre e pere nn ia l tu r fgras s e s , Ke ntucky b lu e g ras s (.fQ.g pr at e n s i s<br />

L.), tall fescu e (F e stu c a arun d inac e a Sc h r eb . ) , an d per en nia l<br />

ryegrass (Lalium per e o ne L.) wer e see d e d Apr il 26, 19 90. Tr e a t ment s<br />

were a p p l ie d Ju ne 22 (PO I ) and Ju ly 10 (P02) u sing a cO 2 - p ropel led<br />

backpac k sprayer. Fenoxa prop was applied alone (0.07, 0 . 10, 0. 13,<br />

0 .20 kg ai ha- 1), or with su r factan t a t 0. 25\: , and in combina tion<br />

wi th bentazon (0.56, 0.84 kg ai ha- t ) . Sta nd, vigor, and color of<br />

t urf gr a sses as well as contr ol of crabgrass were recorded .<br />

Fe n oxa p ro p a l one injur ed Kentucky blu egra s s and t all fe s c ue<br />

an d onl y s l igh t ly perennia l ryeg r ass r e g a r dl e s s when a pp l i ed .<br />

Addit ions of surfactan t did not red uc e inj ury t o any of t h e<br />

tu r fg ra sses . Combinations of fe noxaprop plus bent azon, with or<br />

wi t hou t su r f ac t a n t , decreased the in j u r y effected by f enoxaprop<br />

al one. Cont rol of crabgrass by fen oxaprop a lone was ef f e ct ive i n<br />

all three tur f s p ec ies b ut gr e ater with the high er rat e s and<br />

g e ne r a l l y , gr e a t er wit h the ea r l y a pp lica tio n. Add i t io n s o f<br />

su rfac tant and/or ben tazon to fenoxaprop did no t imp rove<br />

s igni fica ntly crabgrass cont rol.<br />

Fr om t h i s t wo - y e a r s t ud y we c onc l ud ed th at fenoxap rop ca n be<br />

s a fe ly us e d o n n e wl y -s e ed ed turfgr a s se s whe n t a nk - mixe d wit h<br />

bent a zon .<br />

' New Je r se y Agric . Exp. Stn. Publication No. J -15173 -2 -90 .<br />

2Re s . Pr of . We e d <strong>Science</strong> and Res . As soc . , res p ec tiv e ly , Crop<br />

Scien ce Dept., Rutg e r s Un i v ersi t y , New J ersey .


113<br />

MULTI PLE APPL I CAT I ONS OF LOW RATES OF FENOXAPROP I N RYEGRAS S 1<br />

R.G . PROSTAK AND R. D. I LNI CKI 2<br />

AB STRACT<br />

Due t o a l a c k o f eff e cti ve lab eled paste mer gen ce herbicid es<br />

fo r crabgrass ( Di gi ta ria san gu i na l is L. ) co nt r o l a poss ib l e<br />

so l ution migh t be t o e xp a nd t he ti me s fe noxap r op can be sa f e l y<br />

app lied. Low rates a nd va rio us sc hedu l e s of fe no xap ro p in ry e grass<br />

wer e evalua ted in 1990 at the Ad elph ia Re s earch Ce nte r, Ad e lphia ,<br />

New Jersey. The objectives of the s t Udy we re t o (i) to decr e ase the<br />

phy to toxic ef fect o f f e noxa pr op when a pp l i ed ear l i e r in t he se a son<br />

t han recomm en ded by using mUl t i p le seque nt i a l l ow rat e s a nd (i 1)<br />

to det e rm i ne th e effect of mUl ti pl e l ow r ates on c ra bgra ss c ontro l.<br />

Al l treatm en t s were ap plie d in 26 0 1 of wat er ha "' a t 210 kP a<br />

t o pere nnia l ry e g r a s s (Lol i um per en ne L. 'Palm e r ') using a CO 2 ­<br />

pro pel led ba c kpac k sprayer . The e tiudy c ons is t e d of th r e e<br />

replications i n a comple te ly random ized b lo ck design . Trea tments<br />

in cl uded t wo r a t e s of f e noxa pr op (0.034 an d 0.045 kg ai ha'<br />

l<br />

)<br />

applied ei ther alone early in t he seaso n or sequentia lly thr oughout<br />

the season. Treatmen ts were applied May 31 (PO,), June 26 (P0 2),<br />

JU ly 18 (P0 3) and August 24, 1990 (PO,,). Turf color a nd in j ury were<br />

rated and c rabgrass con t rol was e va l ua t ed fo ur t imes dur in g the<br />

expe rimen ta l pe riod.<br />

NO co l or d i ff e r ence s wer e obs erv ed wi t h a ny of t he t r e a t me nt s<br />

rega rd less o f th e t i me of appl icatio n. Turf i nj ur y was obs erved<br />

on l y wi th the f irst a ppl icat ion o f 0 .034 kg ai ha · 1 ( POl). The ot her<br />

treatments, bot h aft e r the f irst a pp lication a nd SUbsequent<br />

app lications, r e s u l t e d in no t ur f i nj ury . App licatio ns of 0.034 and<br />

0.045 kg ai ha" provided crabg rass con t r o l in ear ly season but<br />

control was poor in late season. The t r e at me nt of 0 .045 kg ai ha "'<br />

applied at (PO,), (POl)' and (PCJ) r e su lt e d in seaso n l on g c rab g rass<br />

co ntrol. The r e ma i ni ng t r e at ment s resu l ted in no si gni fic an t<br />

di f ferences be tween t hem.<br />

Thi s prel i min ary stu dy i ndic ated th a t by using mult ip l e<br />

se qu entia l low ra tes we ca n e xp and th e t i me of f en oxapr op<br />

app l ica tion before and af ter t hat r e c ommende d by the manufac ture r<br />

wi tho ut caus ing turf injury a nd s ti l l obt a i n good cra bgrass<br />

con trol .<br />

' New J er s e y Agric . Exp. Stn . Pub l icatio n No. J - 15 173 - 3-90 .<br />

2under grad ua t e St ude nt an d Re s . Pr o f e s sor of wee d Sc ien c e , crop<br />

Sc i e nce Depa r tmen t, Rut ge rs Uni ve r sit y , New Br uns wi c k , NJ , 08 90 3 .


Crab gras s Control<br />

114<br />

In Golf Cou rse Fairwa y Tu rf.<br />

F .S. Ross i and J. e . Neal I<br />

Abstr act<br />

High inten sity tu rfgra ss m an agem ent practi ced on golf cou rse<br />

fa irway tu rf re quir es cons ist ent an d effective crabg ra ss (Dig lta ri a<br />

spp .) contr ol. Typ ica lly. this is ach ieved wi th pr eem ergent herbi cid es ,<br />

h owever , fai lu re of th es e h erbicides is well known due to vari able<br />

environmental conditio ns and misapp lica tion . We eva lua ted the<br />

efficacy of seve ra l post em ergent herb icides for cr abgrass contr ol in<br />

fa irway tur f. A field study was condu cted wi th 3 a pplica tion s of<br />

feno xa prop appli ed at 14 day int erval s at 0.03, 0.0 4 . 0.06 kg ai/ h a in<br />

300 Lili a and 0.04 kg at yha in 997 Lili a . one appli cation of dtthlopyr at<br />

0.28 or 0.5 6 kg ai/ ha and a t 0. 56 kg al t h a in com bin atio n wi th<br />

fenoxa prop at 0. 04 kg ai /h a, an d 3 app li cati ons of MSMA app li ed at 14<br />

day int erval s at 1.12 kg ai/ ha with and witho u t a safene r. Ini tial<br />

applicati ons were ma de whe n cra bgras s wa s in th e 3 leaf st age.<br />

Fenoxapro p alone at 0.06 kg ai/h a and at 0.0 4 in combin ation wi th<br />

dt tht opyr at 0.56 kg ai/h a provided exceptional (>95%) se ason long<br />

contr ol. Fenox apro p at 0.0 4 kg ai/h a applied in 300 or 997 L/h a<br />

pr ovided exce llen t contr ol (>90%). Previou s resear ch has sho wn<br />

redu ced phyt ot oxicity to puttin g green turf from high volum e<br />

applicatio ns of fenoxapr op a t 0.04 kg ai/ ha. Dttht opyr at 0.28 or 0. 56<br />

kg ai/ha provid ed acce ptab le con tro l (>85%) from one a pp lica tion .<br />

Fenoxaprop at 0.03 an d MSMAa t 1.12 kg ai/h a withou t the safener<br />

required 3 a pplica tions to provide accep ta ble con tr ol. However the<br />

safener. applied with MSMA. significantly redu ced efficacy. Thi s stud y<br />

indi ca tes ava ilable options for excellen t cra bgra ss con trol in fairway<br />

tu rf in clude. fen oxaprop alon e a t 0.06 . 0.04 kg ai/ ha a t 300 and 99 7<br />

Lyha . or at 0.04 kg ai/ha in combinatio n wit h dtth topyr at 0.5 6 kg<br />

a t/ba.<br />

l / Graduate Research Ass ist ant and Assoc iate Pro fessor, Corn ell<br />

Untverst ty. Ith aca . NY


115<br />

CRABGRASS CONTROL IN BLUEGRASS WIlli<br />

DIlliIOPYR<br />

S. W. Bingham, WJ . Chism, and R.L Shaver'<br />

ABSTRA CT<br />

The objectives of this resear ch were 1) to evaluate dith iopyr for pre- and postemergence<br />

Jarge crabgrass [~~(L ) Scop.] and smooth crabgrass (~~<br />

(Schreb. ex Schweig.) Schreb. ex Muhl] contro l and 2) to evaluate different formulations of<br />

dithiopyr for crabgr ass control and effects on Kentucky bluegrass [f2il ~ (L) cv.<br />

Plush] growth and quality. The preemergence tests were applied in ea rly April and<br />

postemergence test were applied in June or July.<br />

The test sites were located at VPI&SU Turfgrass Research Center on Kentucky<br />

bluegrass which was established in the Fall of 1987. This excellent turfgrass was mowed at<br />

3.2 em, vertical mowed, aerified and overseeded with crabgrass seed at 375 gJ looo m' to<br />

promote crabgrass eme rgence and growth. The mowing height was raised to 3.8 em in July.<br />

The growth stage for one postemergence test was 3·true leaf to I-tiller with a few at 3­<br />

tiller stage. The second postemergence experi ment was treated at 1- to 3-tiller stage with<br />

a few 5-tiller plants.<br />

The emulsifiable concentrate formulations (EC) of dithiopyr at 0.28 kg/h a or above<br />

gave excellent ear ly preemergence control of crabgrass . Using dithiopyr (EC) rates below<br />

0.42 kg/he, sequential applications were required to maintain residual crabgrass control into<br />

October. However, sequential dithiopyr (EC) treatm ents at 0.14 kg/h a provided excellent<br />

crabgrass contro l into October. The three granular formulations (G) of dithl cpyr evaluat ed<br />

were MON 15178 (0.05%), MON 15181 (0.10%), and MON 15152 (0.25%). The rates of<br />

these formulatio ns of dithiopyr (G) for excellent crabgrass contr ol through October was 0. 14<br />

kg/ ha for MON 15178, 0.21 kg/ ha for MON 15181 and 0.28 kg/ ha for MON 15152. Below<br />

these rates, sequential applications of the gran ular formulations were necessary for<br />

crabgrass control at the above rates. In these studies, three times as much dithiopyr in an<br />

EC formulation was needed for excellent crabgrass contro l as compa red to a 0.05%<br />

granu lar formulation.<br />

In the early postemergenc e test dithiopyr (EC) was slow to give adequate control;<br />

however, late in the seaso n, crabgrass control was good. In the mid-postmergence test,<br />

dithiopyr (EC) was very slow to provide excellent crabgrass control. Consistent<br />

posteme rgence crabgrass contro l required a 0.84 kg/ ha rate of dithiopyr EC. Th e quality<br />

of the Kentucky bluegrass was excellent and there was no apparen t injury to the bluegrass.<br />

'Prof., Research Assoc. & Lab Spec., Dept. of Plant Path., Phy., & <strong>Weed</strong> Sci., Virgin ia<br />

Polytech. lnst. and State Univ., Blacksburg. VA. 2406 1-0331


116<br />

NEW TOOLS FOR SELECfIVE CONTROL OF CRABGRASS IN COOL-SEASON<br />

TURFGRASS<br />

P. C. Bhowmik and B. M. O'Too le l<br />

ABSTRACf<br />

Field experimen ts were conducted on an established perennial ryegrass


117<br />

SELE CTE D CRABGRASS CONTROL<br />

EVALUAT I ONS FOR MARYLAND IN 1990<br />

P . H . De rnoeden and J. M. Krouse"<br />

ABSTRA CT<br />

Thre e pree mergen ce a nd two postemergence pl us preemerg e nce her b i c i d e ta nkmix<br />

s tudies conducted in 19 90 ar e Bummarize d belo w. Her bic i d es were app li ed at<br />

the r ates and date s shown in Tab l es 1 and 2 or as noted in 50 gpa a t 3 6 psi.<br />

Test si t e s treated with preemerg ence he r b i ci des we re i r r i g a t e d o r r a i n o c c u r red<br />

wi t h i n 48 hr of a p p l ication. Pl o ts were 5 b y 5 ft in si ze and wer e arranged in<br />

a r ando mized co mp le te b lo c k wit h f o ur r e p l ic a ti on s. Percen t o f p l o t a rea co ver ed<br />

by smoo th crabgras<br />

on a a t o 100\<br />

s [Digitari<br />

s cale .<br />

a i sc ha emum (S cre b . ) Muhl. J wa s d et e rm i ne d v i s u a lly<br />

Dat a wer e s ub je cted to ana lysi s of varia nc e an d<br />

significantl y different means we r e separated at P '" 0.05 b y Du n c a n' s mul t ip le<br />

range test .<br />

Pr e emer g en c . Stu die s<br />

In st ud y I , most he rbi cides p rovi d e d excellent (>90 \) s moot h c rabgrass<br />

con t r o l (T a bl e 1). Howe ver , pend i met halin (3 .0 lb /A) and DCPA provided goo d<br />

c o nt r o l (85 -9 0\) i bensuli de ( 12 I b /A) and etho fumesate provided fai r cont ro l (70 ­<br />

80\ ); and be nsulide ( 10 l b /A) p rovided poor control «60\ ) .<br />

St ud y II wa s cond uc ted in a mature stand . of Flyer c reeping red f escue<br />

(~ r ubra L . ssp. rubra) . Herbicides were a pp l i ed ini tially on 2 Apr and<br />

sequential s o n 15 May 1990. Smooth crabgrass co ver i n un t r e a t e d p lo ts a ver ag e d<br />

61\ o n I sept and all treat ments (oxadiazon 2G at 3.0 and 4 . 0 l b / A; pend ime thalin<br />

60DG a t 1.5 + 1.5 a nd 3 .0 lb /A; p r o d i ami ne 65 0G a t 0 .50 and 0.65 l b /A ; d i th i opy r<br />

lEC at 0 .38 and 0 . 50 I b / A; OCPA a t 10.5 + 5 .2 lb / A; an d bene fin + tr ifl u ralin 2G<br />

at 2 .0 + 1.0 l b/ A) pr ov i d e d >97\ c o nt ro l (data not sh own ) . Oxadia zon , DCPA, a nd<br />

b enef in + t riflu ra l i n r e d uc ed F ly er cove r (b a r e gro u nd r a ng ing 13 -1 8\ o f pl ot<br />

a r ea) s ign ificant ly whe n compa red t o u ntr e at e d p lo ts (b a r eg ro u nd '" 4 \) .<br />

Stud y I II compared granula r f o rmu l at i o ns o f oxa diazo n a nd d i t h i op y r . All<br />

treatments we re appl ied on 26 Mar 1990 , and smooth crabgrass co ver i n unt r eated<br />

plots a ver aged 35\ on 31 Aug 1990 (data not s hown ). Treatment s p rovidi ng >91\<br />

control were as fol lo ws : o x ad i a zo n 2G at 3.0 and 4 .0 lb /A; RP EXP 036218 2G at<br />

3 .0 and 4 .0 Ib /A i MON 151 78 0 . 0 5G at 0 .125 l b /A; MON 15181 O. lOG at 0 .187 and<br />

0 . 2 50 lb /A ; and MON 1515 2 0.2 5G a t 0.38 and 0 .50 lb /A . RP EXP 03621C 2G at 3.0<br />

and 4 .0 l b /A and MON 151 78 0 . 0 5G at 0.0 92 lb /A pro vided 83 to 86'\ control.<br />

Po s i:e lll.er g e n c e Stu d i es<br />

In St udy IV (Tab le 2) , herbicid es were applied 21 Jun e 1990 when smoot h<br />

crabg ras s wa s in t he 4-le af to 4-tiller stage . Exce ll ent postemergence a nd<br />

su bsequen t p r ee mergence c ontrol (>90 \) was provided by dit hiopyr 1EC + MSMA6L<br />

( 0 .25 + 0.5, 0 . 38 + 0.5, and 0 .38 + l. 0 lb /A ) , a nd dithiopyr lE C + fenoxap ro p 1EC<br />

(0.25 + 0 .09 a nd 0 .25 + 0. 18 lb/A ). Di t h i op yr + f eno xa prop , e s p eci a ll y 0 . 2 5 +<br />

0.18 lb/A rat e, disco lored Kenbl ue Kent uck y b lue g r a s s si g n i f ic ant l y, an d the<br />

d isco lo ra tion persis ted for abou t 30 days . Good con t rol ( 8 7%) was provi d ed b y<br />

di t hiopyr alone at 0.5 lb/A an d d it hiopyr + HSMA (0. 25 + 1.0 lb / A) . All ot her<br />

treatments ga ve comme rcially unacc eptabl e co nt rol.<br />

In St ud y V, herbi ci des wer e app lied 11 Ma y 1990 whe n smooth cr abg r a ss was<br />

in the 1 to 3 l e a f stage (mo stl y 2 l eaf and g row i ng be l ow the per en n i a l ry eg rass<br />

canopy) . Untreated plots had an a ve rage of 8 1\ cr a bg ra s s c ov e r on 31 Aug (data<br />

not sho wn ) . Excel l ent po ste merge nc e and subsequent preemergenc e control (91 -99'\)<br />

wa s prov ide d by DCPA 6F + MSMA6L (7.5 + 2. 0 lb / A and 7 .5 + 1. 5 + (1. 5 l b /A MSMA<br />

applied sequentiall y o n 24 May»; prod iamine 6 SDG + qu inclorac 50W ( 0 .5 + 0 .7 5<br />

lb /A); pr odiamine 65DG + fe no xaprop lEC (0.5 + 0.12 lb /A); an d d i t h i op y r (0 . 5<br />

lb /A). Goo d con t r o l (8 5'\) was pro vided by d.ithiopyr at 0 .38 lb /A an d fair<br />

control (78 '\ ) was pr o v id ed by pendimethali n 60DG + fenoxaprop lEC (1. 5 + 0 . 12<br />

lb /A) •<br />

' IAssoc. Pr o f . and Res. Asst., respecti vel y; Dept . of Agronomy , Univ. o f<br />

Mary la nd, Colleg e Park, MO 207 42 .


118<br />

Tab l e 1. Pre emerge nce smooth crabgrass co nt ro l i n Pal mer<br />

peren n i a l r ye g r a sB ( La l i um ~ L .), s i lve r Sp r in g<br />

MD, 19 9 0 .<br />

Smoot h cr abgr as s<br />

He r b i c i d e s-<br />

Rate<br />

( Ib a i /A )<br />

o xa d t aec n 2G<br />

Oxad i a zo n 2G<br />

3. 0<br />

4. 0<br />

Pendime t h a li n 600 G<br />

1.5 + 1.5<br />

Pe ndi meth a.lin 6 0DG<br />

3.0<br />

Pro diamin e 65DG<br />

0 .50<br />

Prodiami n e 65DG<br />

0.65<br />

Dith iopyr lEe<br />

0.38<br />

Dithiopyr rec<br />

0.50<br />

Dithiopyr O.25G<br />

0.25<br />

Dithiopyr O.25G<br />

0.38<br />

Benefln 2 . 5G<br />

2. 0 " 2 . 0<br />

Benef ln + trifl u r a li n 2 .5 G 2 . 0 + 1. 0<br />

Be nsu l i d e 4 EC<br />

Ben s ul i d e 4EC<br />

10. 0<br />

12 . 0<br />

Et ho fumesate 1. SEC<br />

1.5 + 1.0<br />

DCPA 61'<br />

10 . 5 + 5. 2<br />

Untr eated<br />

Cov e r<br />

Cont ro l<br />

-- ~ ; ;*-;;- - - (') --;; --- -<br />


119<br />

DITH IOPY R FORMULAT ION S AND TANK- MI X COMBI NATIONS FOR<br />

POSTEMERGENCE CONTROL OF CRABGRASS IN COOL-SEASON TURF<br />

K. E. Ka c k l ey , D. C. Riego and J. M. Hi99ins'<br />

AB STRACT<br />

The post emergence acti vity o f MON 15100 ( d i t hi opy r ) formul atio ns fo r<br />

cr a bgr a s s (Di gi t a ri a spp . ) co ntrol was e v a l ua t e d o ve r the last t h r e e ye ar s i n<br />

s ma l l r eplicat e d plo ts . MON 1510 0 1 EC for mulations pr o v i de d e x c e ll e nt<br />

po s t e me r ge n c e con trol of cr a bgr a s s pr i or to till e r fo r mat ion . Pe rf o r ma nc e<br />

after the tiller stage of crabg ras s was not a s effective . However, ta nk - mix<br />

co mbi n a t io n s of MON 151 0 0 1 EC form u lations with MSMAor fenox aprop hav e<br />

pro vi ded excellent contro l of cr abgrass i n the o ne to th re e ti ller stag e .<br />

Gra nula r formu lations o f MON 15 100 o n clay o r fe r til i zer ha v e a ls o p r o vi d e d<br />

postemergence crabgrass con t rol. The v a rious dithiopyr fo rmulation s have<br />

e x h i bi t e d safet y t o maj o r cool-season turf s pe c i e s such as Ken tucky bluegra ss<br />

(fm! pratensis L.), perennial ryegr ass (Lo l i um oe renne L.), ta l l fesc ue<br />

(~ arundinacea Schreb.) an d bentg rass (Agro stis p a l u s t r i s L. ).<br />

' pr o du c t Deve lopme nt Represe ntatives a nd Prod uct Manag e r, I nd u s t r i a l ,<br />

Green s a nd Residen tia l, Mons a nto Comp a ny, c /o 8404 49th Av enue ,<br />

Colleg e Park, MD 20740 .


120<br />

GROUND IVY AND HEALALL CONTROL IN TURF<br />

J. C. Neal and A. F . s enesac'<br />

Ground ivy (Glechoma hederacea L. ) and h e a l a l l (Pr unella<br />

vulgaris L. ) are creeping perennia l weeds which common ly infes t<br />

cool -season turf and are difficult t o con tro l with current ly<br />

ava i lab le h e r b i c i d e s . Greenhouse and f ield tests were conducted<br />

to eval uate two herbicide strateg ies for control ling t hese<br />

species. Isox aben at 0 .6, 1. 1, and 2.2 kg/ha, and quinc lo rac<br />

(BAS 5 14) at 0 .4, 0.6 , and 0. 8 kg/ha were eval uated a lone and in<br />

comb inat ion with other synthetic auxin herbicides. In ge nera l ,<br />

i s oxa be n was more effective in fie ld tests tha n in greenhouse<br />

tests; whereas, synthetic auxins such as 2,4-0 and t ri c l opy r,<br />

were more effective at lower rates in the greenhouse than in the<br />

fie ld. In the greenhouse , isoxaben at 2.2 kg/ ha provided only<br />

35% and 50% control of ground ivy and healall , respectively.<br />

However, in the field, up to 99% ground ivy and 85% hea lal l<br />

control was obtained. The l oc a l use-rates of 2 , 4-D + triclopy r<br />

amine or c lopyralid + t r i c l op yr amine, provided only 10 t o 20%<br />

he a l all contro l, but when mixed wit h 1 .1 kg/ha of isoxaben, 80%<br />

to 85% c ont r o l was obtained. Quin c lorac eff icacy in field a nd<br />

greenhouse tests were similar for ground iv y; but, for hea la ll ,<br />

gree nho use results were superior . In fie ld t e st s , quinclorac<br />

applied a lone at 0 .8 kg/ ha co ntrolled heala ll; but, the speed of<br />

contro l was improved by tank mixi ng with 2,4-0. Ground ivy was<br />

not con tro lled by quinclorac applied a lone, but was contro lled by<br />

the tank mix with 2 ,4 -0 . From t hese tests, two viab le strategies<br />

for impr oved control of ground ivy an d h e a l a l l in cool -season<br />

tu rf are: quinclorac + 2,4-0 at 0.8 + 1 kg/ha, or i s oxa b e n +<br />

synthetic auxin herbicides such as 2,4-0 + triclopyr or<br />

clopyra l id + triclopyr. Further research is needed to optim ize<br />

t he t ank mix ratios .<br />

lAssociate Professor , Dep . Flor icu ltu re and Or namental<br />

Hort iculture, Cornell Univ ., Itha ca, NY; and <strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

Extension Specialist, Cornell Univ., Long Island Hort ic ultural<br />

Research Lab , Ri verhe ad, NY.


121<br />

RESIDUAL PHYTOTOXICIT Y OF HEXAZINONE, l MAZAPYR, TE BUTHI URON, AND<br />

TRICLQPYR ON SELECTED CROPS<br />

c . Be n j amin Co f fman an d J. Ra y Fr an k t<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Hexa z in one , ima zap yr, t eb uthiuron, a nd t ri cl opyr are<br />

ge ner all y used for p r e a nd pos t eme r g e nc e c on t ro l o f perenni al<br />

weed s on non -c rop land , r a n ge , a nd pastur e. F i e l d ex p e rim e nts<br />

were esta blished i n 1988 a t Beltsv i l l e, Marylan d , to ev a l u ate the<br />

r es id ual activity of th e s e h e rbi cide s o n s e lected c r op s ov e r a<br />

two yea r per iod . Th e exp e r i menta l a rea was clea n c ul t iva t e d a nd<br />

t rea ted wi th methy l br omid e p rior to the es t ab l i s hme n t of th e<br />

research p l o ts. Plots were 3 by 4 m i n a ra ndom i zed b l oc k d e s i g n.<br />

Herbicide treat ments we re r ep l icat ed th ree ti mes. Hexa z inone an d<br />

teb ut hiuron were applied a t 2.2 , 4 . 5 , a nd 6 .7 kg na" , Imaz a p yr<br />

wa s applied a t 2.2 , 4 . 5, and 9.0 kg ha - 1. Tri clo pyr wa s applie d<br />

at 3 .4, 6.7, a nd 1 0 . 1 kg ha-' . Cr ops wer e s own o r pl ant e d i n<br />

30 cm rows one day afte r tr e at me nt ( OAT), an d on e, t hr e e , s ix,<br />

a nd 12 weeks after tre atment ( WAT ) in 1 9 8 8 . All p l ots we re<br />

irriga ted to s u p p l ement ra i nfa l l an d p r ovi de a t le a st 2 c m wate r<br />

per we ek . Vi s ua l e stimat es o f p l a nt re s p o n s es ( a to 1 0 0 ) we re<br />

ma de a t s e lec ted int erva ls th roughout the growi ng sea s on. Te s t<br />

s pec i e s i n cl Uded whea t ( Tri ticu m a e sti vum L. ), k id n e y be a n (<br />

Pha s eo l u s vul ga ris L. ) , co rn ( Zea DlSY§. L . ) , squash ( cucurbit a<br />

llim.Q L. ) , ok ra [ Abelmoschus es c ule nt u s ( L. ) Moench . ], banana<br />

( Musa acu mina t a Co lla ), and pot ato ( ~ t ub e rosu m L . ).<br />

Bana na s we r e tr an s pl an t s a nd pot atoes we re s own a s t ubers; al l<br />

ot he r spe cies were see ded. In 1 9 8 9 t h e exper imen tal p lo t s were<br />

replanted in June and Aug ust . Irriga ti o n and data co l lec t ion<br />

were a s in 1988 . Banana was ex cl uded i n 1 9 89.<br />

In 1 9 8 8 , c or n sow n one OAT t ole r ated t e b ut h iu ro n a t 2. 2 kg<br />

na"! thr ough t h e e nd o f th e g r owi ng se ason, bu t di d no t tol e r at e<br />

th e h i gh er do ses . Squas h a nd ok r a t o l e r a t e d i maza p yr a t a ll<br />

rate s when sown on e OAT , and on e an d three WAT. The r e wa s no<br />

t o l e r a nc e to h e xa zin on e by any s p e cie s . Cor n to l er a te d tri c l op y r<br />

at 3 .4 kg h a - 1 whe n sow n thre e , si x and 1 2 WAT.<br />

In 19 8 9 , pota t o tol er at ed ima zap y r at 2 . 2 kg n a " wh e reas<br />

ki dn e y bea n an d squash t ol e r at ed tr iclopy r a t 3.4 kg h a "! in t he<br />

June plan ting . I n the Aug us t p lan ting I corn and p ot at o t o l e r a t e d<br />

i ma zap yr whereas squash and potato we re t ol er a nt of r esid ual<br />

t r i c l op y r . There were no ot he r her b icid e to le rances observed i n<br />

eit h er ye a r .<br />

, Rese a r ch Agron omi st a nd Wee d Sc i enti st, r es p ec t ive ly , USDA,<br />

ARS,Belt s vi ll e and Fr eder i ck MD.


122<br />

OAT AND SOYBEAN YIELDS IN CROWNVETCHAND OTHER COVER CROPS<br />

N. L. Hartwig !<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Crownvetch ~ zanaL.) for this study was seeded on April 20, 1976. A number<br />

of research studies rela ted to the use of cover crops for agronomic crop produ ction have been done<br />

in this area since. In 1985 a study was set up to look at a number of different cover crops for a<br />

fO UT year crop rot ation of com-com-oats-winter wheat/soybeans with three levels of nitrogen<br />

applied to com when it appeared in the rotation. The trial was large enough so all crop s in the<br />

rotation wererepresented each year. Flatpea, another perennial legume. was introducedinto the<br />

trial from 1985 to 1987. Other cover crops included hairy vetch and winter rye which were seeded<br />

yearly in those plot s to be planted to com or winter wheat but not to oats or soybeans. Oat yields<br />

are presented for the period of 1987 to '90 and soybean yields for the period 1987 to '89. In each<br />

case the year of extreme drought in 1988 is included. Yields in 1988 are a chance observation of<br />

the influence of crownvetch and other cove r crops on oat or soybean yields in a very dry year,<br />

It was expected that the presence of a crownvetch living mulch would have a detrimenta l<br />

effect on oat and soybean growth and yield but oat yields were the same or better when planted. into<br />

crownvetch regardles s of the amount of sidedressed nitrogen on the com prior to oats in the<br />

rotation. This would indica te that even in an extremely dry year. crownvetch producing up to<br />

about 500 Ib/A of dry matter did not result in increased competition for moi sture. In 1990. when<br />

no nitrogen was applied to the oats. oat yields were significantly greater than most of the other<br />

cover crop s. Flatpea didn 't have a detrimental effect on oat yields until the last year when it<br />

became so vigorous it overtopped the oats by harve st in most plots and significantly suppressed<br />

yields relative to the crownvetch.<br />

Soybean yields were also not significantly affected by the cover crop in any of the years<br />

1987 through '89. In 1988, soybean growth was suppresse d due to drought and as a result the<br />

soybeans were not nearly as competitive as they would have been in a normal year, thus allowing a<br />

lot of recovery growth of erow nvetch and flatpea, Soybeans yields appeared to be slightly reduced<br />

as a result.<br />

It would appear that both no-till oats and soybeans can be grown in a living mulch of<br />

crownvetch without any loss in potential yield as long as the crown vetch is sufficiently<br />

suppressed. Flatpea could perhaps also be used if a more potent herbicide program or tillage were<br />

used to suppres s it.<br />

lNTRODUcn ON<br />

Research on the use of crownve tch (Coronilla varia L. 'Penn gift') as a living mulch for<br />

agronomic crop production was started at Penn State in 1975 (1). Initial researc h from 1975 to<br />

1980 determin ed how to manipulate crownvetch in no-till com ~~ L.) . Starting in 1981,<br />

oats (Avena sativa L. ) was introduc ed into the rotation and crownvetch was allowed to recover one<br />

year in four for hay to see if crow nvetch could be maintained without losing it. From 1985 to<br />

1987 a study was set up to look at a number of differe nt cover crops with a four year crop rotatio n<br />

of corn-corn-oats-winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)lsoybeans (Glycine !.!lllAL.) with three<br />

levels of nitrogen applied to corn when it appeared in the rotation. The trial was large enough so<br />

all crops in the rotation were represe nted each year. Flatpea~ sylvestris L. 'Lathco'),<br />

another perennial legume, was introduced into the trial from 1985 to 1987. Other cover crops


123<br />

included hairy vetch (Y&ia~ L.) and winter rye~~ L.) which we re seeded yearly<br />

in those plots to be planted to com or win ter wheat but not to oats or soy beans. It was determined<br />

and reponed mat com grown in crownvetch out-yielded com without crownvetch even in 1988<br />

when Pennsylvan ia had its driest Jun e and July in 100 years (2,3). The research data presented in<br />

this papercovers oat and soybean yields with or without the perennial crownvetch or flarpeacover<br />

crops and following com whic h also had the winter annuals winter rye or hairyvetc h cover crop s.<br />

MATERIALS AND MElHODS<br />

Th e crow nvetch for thi s study was seeded on April 20, 1976 on a Murrill silt loam soil<br />

(Typ ic H apludult) containing abo ut 16% sand . 67% silt. 14% clay and 2.5% organi c matt er. Th e<br />

area was limed to a pH of 7.0 befo re seeding andit has been limed since to maintain a pH of about<br />

7.0 . A number of researc h studies related to the use of cover crop s for agron omi c crop producti on<br />

have beendone in this area since.<br />

Cover crops were plant ed in block s 18.3 by 22.86 m. Each block was subdivided in<br />

twelve 4.6 by 6.7 m plot s. Each year of the four year rotation was assign ed a strip of three plots .<br />

The trial was rep licated 3 times.<br />

Corn in the rotation was sidedre ssed with 0 , 77 , and 154 kg ha-t of nitrogen as UAN in a<br />

band between each com row. No-till oars w hich followed com in the rotati on received a blanket<br />

topdre ssing of36, 80. 73 and 0 kg ha-! nitroge n in 1987. '88. '89 and '90 respectiv ely. W inter<br />

wheat followed oats in the rotation and was harve sted for silage in late Ma yo r ear ly June.<br />

Soybean s we re then no-tilled into the whea t stubble in early June and rece ived no fertilize r.<br />

D ue to recurring problem s with dand elio n~~ Webe r in Wiggers) and<br />

quackgr ass~~ (L.) Beauv.), es pec ially in the no cover trea tme nts, glypbosa re!<br />

[N-(phosp hono me thyI)glycin el and 2.4-D [(2,4-dic hlorop heno xy)acetic acid ] low vo latile ester<br />

(LVE)@ 1.1 + 0.55 kg ha- l were applied Ma y 7. 1987 ; glyp hosate @ 1.5 kg ha -l was app lied<br />

alone Apri l 21, 1989; and 2,4-D LVE @0 .55 kgha -! wasapplieda loneinOcto ber 16, 1989<br />

before seeding oats no-till on 5/11/8 7; 3/29/88; 4/17/ 89 and 4/10/90. Dand elio n is norm ally not a<br />

problem in a good living mulc h gro und cover but the abo ve treatmen ts were applied to all plots<br />

going to oats regardless of the sensitiv ity of the grou nd cover to avoid tre atmen t variati ons tha t<br />

co uldn' t be accounted for Statisticall y. Althou gh crow nveteh and flarpe a are both very sensitive to<br />

glypbosa te and espec ially 2.4-0, applicat ions mad e before dandeli on bloom in the spring or after<br />

several hard frosts in the fall will not result in the loss of these perennial living mul ches.<br />

U sual ly add itional weed contro l and/or living mulch suppress ion is neces sary after the oats<br />

has emerged since glyphosate and 2.4-0 have little or no soil residual activit y. No additi onal<br />

treatment was needed. in 1987 but in 1988 a prem ix of brom oxynil (3.5-dib rom0-4­<br />

hydrox yben zonitri le) + MCP A [(4-e hIoro-2 -me thylphenoxy)ace tic acid] @0 .55k gha - l each was<br />

applied Jun e 3 in l 15 1/ha of liquid nitrogen to suppress dand elion. Due to the ex treme ly dry<br />

weather followin g this trea tme nt it did little good. MCPA@0 .275kg/ha- 1 was applied 6/19189<br />

wh en oa rs was in the boot stage. crownve rch 25 to 35 cm and Cana da thistle (O n i um arvense (L.)<br />

Scop.) 45 to 60 em. Th is treatment was too little too late to do an effecti ve job of suppres sing the<br />

cro wnvetch or Canada thi stle . O n May 25. 1990. MCPA @ 0.55 kg/h a~l was appli ed to oats,<br />

cro wn veteh and Ilarpea 10 to IS cm tal l with excellen t suppress ion of the cro wnvetch. Th e flarpea<br />

wa s tempo rarily supp ressed but by harvest time the recovery grow th had almost buried the oats in<br />

some plots.<br />

1 Ranger, Monsanto Agricultural Products Co., 51.Louis, MO


124<br />

Soybeans were drilled in 25 cm rows with a no-till drill on 6/2/87. 6/6188and 6112/89at a<br />

seeding rate of 100 kglha, In 1987, metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2­<br />

methoxy-l -methylethyl)acetamideJ+ bentazon [3-(I -methylethyl)-(I H)-2,l ,3-benzothi. diazin­<br />

4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidel at 0.55 + 1.1kg/ha-1+ emulsifiable crop oil at 2.34 1/ha-1 was applied<br />

June 11 for redr oot pigweed~~ L.) and annual grass control followed by<br />

imazethapyr [(±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(I-methylethyl)-5-oxo-l H-imidazol-2-yll-5-ethyl-3­<br />

pyridinecarboxylic acid] at 0.1375 kg/ha-! on June 24 to clean up the weeds missed by the first<br />

treatment. In 1988 and 1989, imazethapyr + metolachlor at 0.06875 + 1.65 kg/ha-! was applied<br />

preemergence for annual weed control.<br />

All treatments were applied with a tractor mounted small plot sprayer with 800 15 extended<br />

range flat fan nozzles at IF:!kPa and 187 1/ha of water.<br />

Both the oats and soybeans were harvested with a small plot combine. The harvested area<br />

was 2.44 by 6.7 m out of the middle of each plot. Yields were analyzed using the SAS statistical<br />

package as a split-split-split plot design.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Oat yields for the period 1987 to 1990 were good in aUyears except 1988 when it was<br />

extremely dry in July and August when the oats was filling. There were no nitrogen carryover<br />

effects from nitrogen applied to com except in 1988 (Table 1). Due to the extreme drought, the<br />

high nitrogen level of 154 kglha did significantly increase yield over the 77 kglha rate.<br />

Table I: Influence of nitrogen rates applied to com the previous two years on oat yields when<br />

averaged over cover crops. (n=21)<br />

Nitrogen<br />

Cover<br />

Rate<br />

a<br />

o<br />

77<br />

154<br />

Sigmficance Level (P)<br />

LSD (P=0.05)<br />

a Driest June and July in 100years.<br />

1987 1988'<br />

<br />

57<br />

65<br />

63<br />

0.169<br />

8.8<br />

Only in 1990 was there a significant cover crop effect on oat yields when averaged over<br />

nitrogen levels applied to the com previously (Table 2). In the first three years of the study, 36 to<br />

80 kg/ha of nitrogen was applied each year which was apparently enough to mask any nitrogen<br />

influenced yield differences among the cover crops. In 1990 no nitrogen was applied to the oats<br />

and as a result there was a significant yield reduction, very likely due 10 lack of nitrogen, for oats<br />

following com overseeded with hairy vetch where there was apparently no nitrogen carryover and<br />

where no cover crop had been planted (Table 2). Oat yields were also significantly reduced where<br />

Ilatpea was present as a living mulch because flatpea was not sufficiently suppressed by the<br />

herbicide program in 1990. Flatpea was growing out the top of the oats at harvest time in many<br />

plots. Crownvetch was suppressed very nicely in all years (data not included) by the herbicide<br />

programs and oats yielded the most when planted into a crownvetch living mulch due to the<br />

contribution of some nitrogen and perhaps other factors as yet unidentified.


125<br />

Table 2: Influence of the cover em on oat ields when avera eelover nitro en rates. (0=9<br />

rtrogen<br />

Cover Crop<br />

Rale<br />

kii/ha<br />

None<br />

Winter Ryeb<br />

Crownveteh<br />

Hairy Vetch b<br />

Flatpea<br />

Crownvetc h + Hairy Yetchb<br />

~;R~:: r.e~~n~)<br />

1987<br />


126<br />

I CIA5676:<br />

WEEDCONTROL FOR FI ELD CORNI N THE NORTHEAST<br />

s . W. Cosky, S. Dennis and M. P. Whale n 1<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

the ef~~~~~ v~x:e~~im~;t:C;:~:7~?n1~ c~~~t~~1119i8n8g' ::::5<br />

a~~ ~~~~dt oc~;:l(~~:<br />

!!@Y§ L. ) 1n the North east. I CI A,5676 was app l ied a lone and in t ankm1x<br />

combinat i ons wit h at razine 1n convent i ona l fie ld corn. Al l st udi es wer-e<br />

conduct ed utilizin g ran domized complete bl ock design s and with thre e or<br />

fo ur re pl i cati ons .<br />

Applica ti on ra t e s of ICIA5676 were 50 ;1 type depend en t. Gene r all y ,<br />

I CIA5676 was app lied at rate s fr om 0.75 l b a1/A f or course so ils wit h 3x organ i c mat ter.<br />

Tankrnix a ppl ic atio ns were applie d wit h at ra z tne at 1. 0 t o 1. 5 lb a i/ A.<br />

Seaso n l ong cont rol (>90X) of t mpo r ta nt gr ass weed speci es i nc l Udi ng<br />

giant fo xtai l (Set ar i a faberi Hermm. ), l arge cra bgr ass [Oi git ar ia<br />

sang uina lis (l. }$cop .] and fall panic um ( Pani cum di chotomiflorum Mi chx . )<br />

have been obse rv ed fr om app l i cati ons of ICIA5676 al one . Common<br />

lambsquarter s (Chenopodiu m UJllm!l. ) contro l i s gener a ll y obse r ved at >85%<br />

in earl y rati ngs « 35 days after t r eatment (DAT), but may be le ss at<br />

l ater obser vat i on dates ( >35 OAT) .<br />

Crop t oleran ce to I CIA5676 has been excellent. Visual injur y<br />

ratin gs « 35 OAT) estima t in g red ucti on i n veget ative growt h of co r n are<br />

gene ra l ly < 1 0 ~ and a re comparab le to ot her acet ani lid e he r bici des . Such<br />

symptomolog y is not apparen t at lat e r obs er vation dat es .<br />

These st udi es indic ate th at ICIA5676 may be used succ ess f ully in<br />

weed contr ol prog rams fo r t he cont rol of impor t ant grass and broad le aved<br />

weed spe cie s with exce llen t c rop t ol e ra nce .<br />

II CI Americ as Inc ., Agri cult ura l Prod ucts Group . Wilm in gton, DE<br />

19897 .<br />

2ICIA5676 is a formulate d combinat i on of acet ochl or and th e co rn<br />

sa f ene r dic hl ormid (R25788) contai nin g 6. 4 l b ai / ga l and 1. 08 lb a i}gal ,<br />

r ...c>n.a ... t i v", l v


127<br />

rcrx 5676 IN OJRN<br />

H. P. Wilso n and T. E. Hines 1<br />

Corn (Zea ~ L.) herb icides fal l into s ix chemical clas ses with<br />

chloroacetamides be ing the most comrcnty used fo r preemer qence gras s<br />

control. Acetochlor is a chloroace tamide t hat has been eva l uated as a<br />

corn herbicide. '!hese studies were ronducted with acet ochlo r under the<br />

codes SC-5676 and ICIA-5676 between the years 1985 and 1990. The bo<br />

coded products generally included dichlormid as a he rbi c ide antido te .<br />

Initially, errphasis was placed on studies in conven tional co rn [ IPioneer<br />

3378 1 (R)] with only a l imited mmce r of t reatme nts i ncl uded in no-ti ll<br />

co rn . I n 1989 and 1990, separ ate adja cent st udie s conpa red acetoeh l or<br />

with alachlor in conventiona l and no-t i ll co rn . en the Coas t al Plain<br />

soils which served as the sites for these stud ies , annual grass con tro l<br />

was frequently sufficient fran 1. 0 lb/A acetochlor and consisten tly high<br />

fran 1.25 Ib/A in conventiona l corn. Control of SIOOOthpigweed (Artaranthus<br />

hybridus L. ) , COIlIYO n l anbsqu a rt e r s (Chenopodium album L) , and COITIl'O n<br />

ragweed (Arrbrosia ar temis i f olia L.) was hi gher fr an acetochl or than ala ­<br />

chlor and metol ach l o r . Acetoch l or ra t es r equ ir ed f o r cont rol of ann ual<br />

grasses in no- ti ll corn were a min inum of 1. 5 lb / A or 20% nore than in<br />

ronventional corn. carbinations of acetochlo r with at ra zine have poten ­<br />

tial for control of numerous broadleaf weeds and geasses in ronvent ional<br />

and no-till rom . In the limited corrparisons of ace tochlor with aceto ­<br />

chloe + dich lonnid , dichlonnid pro tected corn fr om ac etoc hl oe i nj ury. In<br />

1990, some eed uct io ns in com gr owth (5 t o 12%) f rom 1 t o 2 lb / A acet o­<br />

chlor + dichlormid were ev ident 7 weeks af t er pl ant ing conv ent io nal com<br />

but yields were not affected; oo-till com has not responded to acet o­<br />

chlor.<br />

lp rofessor and Agri. Res. SCi. , Eas te m Shor e Agr i c. Exp . St n . , Va.<br />

Polytech. Inst. and st ate Univ., pa in te r, VA 23420 .


128<br />

PREEMERGENCE ACTIVITY OF ICIA-5676 IN CONTROLLING ANNUAL GRASSES<br />

IN FIELD CORN<br />

P. C. Bhowmik, B. M. O'Toole ' , and S. Dennis/<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the preemergence activity of ICIA-5676 in<br />

controlling annualgrasses in fieldcom. All treatmentswereappliedpreemergence on May 12 and<br />

25, 1989 and on May 11 and 15, 1990, respectively, in minimum-till (one disking) and in<br />

conventional-till (moldboard plow followed by disking) system. Treatments were applied with a<br />

CO 2 -backpack sprayer at 150 kPa to deliver 187 Uha. The experimental design was a randomized<br />

complete block with three replications. Plots were 2.3 by 3.0 m. Major weed species were large<br />

crabgrass ~~(L .) Scop.] , yellow foxtail ~~ (Weigel) F.T.<br />

Hubb.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium a!l!l!!!lL.), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus<br />

~ L.) in both years. Com injury, percent weedcontrol, and com yields were used for<br />

theevaluation.<br />

In 1989 conventional-till corn, ICIA-5676 at 0.84 to 1.68 kg/ha gave excellent control of<br />

large crabgrass, yellow foxtail, fall panicum ~ dichQtomiflorum Michx .), common<br />

lambsquarter s and common ragweed five weeks after treatment (WAT). At 9 WAT, the same<br />

treatments gave significantly less control (78-88%) oflar ge crabgrass than did metolachlor at I. 68<br />

and 2.2 kg/ha and alachlor at 2.2 kg/ha (93-98% control). Irrespective of the rate, ICIA-5676<br />

gave excellentcontrol of yellow foxtail. In 1990, all treatmentsof ICIA-5675 in combinationwith<br />

atrazineat1.35 kg/hagaveexcellentseason-long controlofyeUowfoxtail, commonlambsquarters,<br />

and redroot pigweed 14 WAT except large crabgrass control (less than 80%).<br />

In 1989 minimum-till corn, ICIA-5676 (0.84 to 1.84 kg/hal controlled large crabgrass<br />

and yellow foxtail 7 WAT as effectively as treatments of alachlor (2.2 kg/hal and rnetolachlor<br />

(1.84 to 2.2 kg/hal . Alachlor applied preemergence at 1.56 kg/ha contro lled yellow foxtail but<br />

gave only 86%controlofl arge crabgrass at thesame rate. Only metolachlortreatmentsat 1.84<br />

and 2.2 kg/ha provided 79 to 84% large crabgrass control 12 WAT. All ICIA-5676 treatments<br />

gave only 50% control of large crabgrass 12 WAT. Similar results were obtained in 1990.<br />

In summary , ICIA-5676 applied preemergenceat 0.84 to l.l kg/ha effectively controlled<br />

largecrabgras, yellow foxtail, fall panicum , common lambsqu arters, and redrootpigw eed in<br />

both years under both conventional- and minimum-till systems. In general , the ICIA-5676<br />

appearedto be less effective in annualgrass control underminimum-till system comparedto<br />

conventional-till system.<br />

IAssociate Professor and Research Technician, Department of Plant and Soil <strong>Science</strong>s,<br />

University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 0 1003.<br />

')...... ~ ----=--- ,__ 101l,, .. 1l. .......... M T


129<br />

Can ada Thistle Control in Corn<br />

S. Glenn, L . Heime r, a nd N. Ande.r aon -'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Canada thistle (~ ~ L . ) (CIRSA) control i n corn<br />

(Z"g,g I!@Y.§. L. ' Pi on e e r 3352') was studied in Was hingt on Cou nty,<br />

Maryland . Th e stu dy area was planted on May 2 , 1990 . All p lots ,<br />

except untreated contro l plo ts, were trea ted wi th 2 .2 kgj ha<br />

atrazine and 2.2 kq jha metolachl or at plan t i ng . Paraqua t a t 0.6<br />

kg/ha + 0 .5 (vjv) X-7 7 wa s also app lied preem ergence t o a ll p lots<br />

that wer e to be t r eat ed wi t h post e mer gence herbicides . Pre ­<br />

emergence appl ic at i ons ' (e -on high CIRSA) of 1.7 and 2 . 2 kg j h a<br />

glyphosate pr oduced 78 and 8 7% CIRSA control 4 week s af ter<br />

trea tme nt (WAT); ho wever, by 13 WAT CIRSA con t ro l was 52 an d 62%.<br />

Tank mixtures of 0 . 6 kg /ha 2,4-D wi t h glyphosate did not improve<br />

CI RSA c on trol compared to applications of gl yphosa te ap p l ied alone .<br />

Preemerg en ce applications o f triclopyr + 2,4 -D ( 0 . 1 + 0.3, 0. 3 +<br />

0.6, and 0.4 + 0.8 kg/hal and at razi ne + Oicamba (L1 + 0 .5 k gjha)<br />

were not ef fective in controlling CIRS A. Ear ly pos teme rgen ce<br />

applications (a u- en CIRSA) of 2 .2 kg /ha at ra z ine + 1% cr op o i l were<br />

also not eff e ctive in c on t r o l l i n g CIRSA . La te postemerge nce ( LP )<br />

applicati ons (au-en CIRSA) of 0.6 kg/ha 2,4 - 0 , 0.3 kg/ ha Oi camba ,<br />

and 0. 6 + 0. 3 kq/ha 2,4 -0 + Oicamba produced 47 , 5 3 , and 80 %<br />

control of CIRSA, respe ctively, 8 WAT. CIRSA co n tro l wi th LP<br />

app lications of 0 .03 and 0.05 kg/ha nicosulfu ron + 1% c ro p o il was<br />

53 and 63 %, 8 WAT. Tank mix tures of 0 .6 kgjha 2 ,4-D wi th 0.0 3 and<br />

0. 05 kg /ha n i c o s u l f u r on produced 75 and 85% CIRSA con tro l .<br />

Chlopyrolid appl ied LP a t 0 .2 and 0.3 kg/ha + 0 .25% X-77 produced<br />

83 an d 92 % CI RSA control . Corn yields i n c r e a s e d 40 t o 60% when<br />

CIRSA was effectively controlled compared to unt r eated co nt ro ls .<br />

!L As sociate Prof . , Grad. Res. Asst. , and Aqric . Techn ., unive rsi ty<br />

of Maryland , College Park, MD 20742.


130<br />

Perenn i al <strong>Weed</strong> Cont rol with Nico sulfuron Combination s<br />

N. Anderson and S . Glenn l l<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Experiments were conducted in Washington Count y , Mar y l a nd to<br />

stu dy the cont rol of hemp dogbane (~ can nabi oum L . ) (APOCA)<br />

a n d wild blackberry (~ allegheniensis L. ) (RU BAL) i n no -ti l l age<br />

c or n cZ§m~ L. ' Pi one e r 335 2 ') . Al l p lo ts were tr e ated wi t h 0 .6<br />

kg jha pa raq ua t, 2.2 kg/ha meto lach lo r , 2.2 kg/ha a tr az in e , an d 0 .5 %<br />

(v/ v ) X-77 . poet. emer'q en c e appli c at ion s we re made when corn was a t<br />

t h e 4- to 5- le af s t ag e a nd APOCA an d RUBAL were 2 5- t o au - em high .<br />

APOCA and RUBAL con trol wi t h ap p l i c at i on s of 0.6 k g / h a 2, 4- 0 was<br />

63 a nd 45 % and with 0.3 kg /ha Dicamba was 55 and 60 % 6 weeks a f t er<br />

treatment ( WAT ). Nicosulf uron ap plied at 0.03, 0.05 , and 0 .07<br />

kg /ha plus 1% crop oil produced 85, 85, and 73 % control of APOCA<br />

and 72, 70, an d 80 % control of RUBAL, respectively, 6 WAT . Ta nk<br />

mixtures of 0.6 kg /ha 2,4 -0 + 0.03 a nd 0 .07 n icos u lfu ron i ncrea sed<br />

APOCA c on tr ol (1 00%) co mpare d t o th e co nt rol ob ta i ne d wi t h e i t he r<br />

he rbici de ap p l ied a l one . Tank mix t u res of 0.6 kg /h a 2,4 - 0 + 0.0 3<br />

a nd 0 . 05 kg / ha n icos u lf uron also in c r e a sed RUBAL c ontr ol ( 85 an d<br />

82 %) compared t o th at obtai ned with e it h e r h erb i ci de app l ied a lo ne .<br />

Combin i ng 0.3 kg / ha Oicamba with n i c os u l f ur on was not a s e f f e cti v e<br />

in con t rolling APOCA and RUBAL as the 2,4 -0 nicosulfu ron t a n k<br />

mi xture s. Stud ies were conduc ted t o e va lu a t e joh n song rass [SQr.9.b.Ym<br />

halepe nse (L.) Pe rs .] (SORH) con t rol wi th nico sulfu ro n appl ied<br />

a lo ne a nd i n t ank mixt u res wit h 2 , 4-D a nd Dica mba. Combina t i ons<br />

o f 2,4 - 0 an d Dic amba r educ ed SORRA c ont rol c ompa r e d t o th at<br />

obt a ined with n ic o su l fu r on a pp lied a l on e 4 WAT. Howeve r , by 9 WAT,<br />

2,4 -0 had no e f f e c t on SORRA con tro l wi th nicos ulf uron . Tank<br />

mixtu res of 0.3 kg /ha Oicamba + 0 .0 3 and 0.05 kg /ha nicosulf uro n<br />

contin ued t o antagonize SORRA co nt rol 9 WAT compa r ed to t hat<br />

obtained with nicosu lfuron applied a l on e .<br />

ill Agr i . Te chn. a nd Assoc. prof . , Unive rs ity of Mary land,<br />

C o] ] AOA Park . MO 20742 .


131<br />

THE EFFECTS OF ROWWIDTH, NI TROGEN<br />

AND HERBI CI DES ON \ffiEAT YIELD<br />

R. L. RITTERl/<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Field stud ies conducte d in Maryland since 1985 examine d t he effect s of row<br />

wi d t h , nitr ogen application , and herbici des on wheat (~ ~ L.)<br />

yi el d .<br />

Studies conducted from 1985 to 1987 exami ne d a variety of herbic id e<br />

prog ram s on wheat pl anted in eit her 20 em or 10 em r ow spac i ngs . <strong>Weed</strong> con t r ol<br />

rating s made l a t e in t he gro wi ng se ason pr i or t o wheat ha rv e st a verage d 70 X f or<br />

the 20 em row spaci ng, wh ile t h e 10 e m row sp aci ng a v era ged 82 %. The s e v i s ua l<br />

r at ings wer e for winter ann ual broa dl e af wee ds. prima ril y co mmon ch i ckwee d<br />

(~ ~ L . ) Wheat y i el ds , als o a ve ra ged for th e 3· ye a r t i me period,<br />

wer e 5,44 3 kg/h a f or t he 20 em r ow sp a c in g a nd 5 ,914 kgjha for the 10 em r ow<br />

s pa cing . Thu s , bet te r weed c on t ro l and h i gher y ie l ds wer e obt a i ne d with the<br />

wheat pla n t ed in na r row er ro ws .<br />

Studies were t hen i n i ti a t ed i n 198 8 t o exam i n e whe at pl an t ed in 10 cm rows<br />

co mpar ed t o wheat planted i n 15 cm r ows . Coupl ed wi th th e s e st ud i es we r e fi ve<br />

differ en t he rbici de prog r ams and t wo dif fe ren t ni t r ogen a ppl ica tio n re gim e s .<br />

Here , a single nitrogen app lica tion of 90 kg/ha applied ea rl y April was c ompar ed<br />

to a sp li t app lication of 67 kg/ha. a pp lie d ea rly Mar ch pl us an add iti ona l 6 7<br />

kg/ha applied earl y April. Wheat y i e l d data ave rage d over the 2 yea rs f ou nd no<br />

diffe rences between the row spacings. Here , whe at y i el d s were 4,5 83 kg/ha f or<br />

the 15 era row spacin g and 4, 650 kg/ha f or the 10 em r ow s pacing. Wheat yields<br />

f or th e nitrogen treatmen ts va ried considerably. The s i ng l e nitrog en tr eatme nt<br />

average d 4 .328 kg/ha for the z -yeer stud y , while t he s plit applica tion yi e lded<br />

4 , 850 kg/ha .<br />

From 1989 to 1990 , a nother se ries of f i el d stud ies c ompar ed n t tr ogen r a t e s<br />

(67,90 and 11 2 kgjha) app li ed al on e , wit h t hife ns ul f u ro n, or wit h t h if en sul f u ron<br />

pl u s surfa ct ant. These appl i cat i on s we r e made ea r l y Ma r ch and compare d t o late<br />

Mar ch app lic a t i on s. Wheat yield da t a aver aged ov e r t he 2 -year stu dy f ound a<br />

pos i t iv e ef fect f r om t he her bi cid e tre a t ment s whe n appl i ed ea rly Mar ch. On th e<br />

other ha nd, whe a t y ie l d s de cre a s ed, par ticul a rly with th e t h if en sul f u r on plu s<br />

s ur fa c t an t plu s n it rog en tr ea t ment, wh en a ppl ie d late March.<br />

lIAssoc. Pr of . , Ag r l c . Ex p. St n . . Agron. Dept. , Unlv. of MD. ,<br />

College Pa r k , MD 20 74 2 .


132<br />

TERBACIL FOR CONTROL OF HENBIT AND COMMONCHICKWEED IN<br />

ESTABLISHED AND SEEDLING ALFALFA<br />

D.O . Ga n s ke l a nd E.5 . Hagood 2<br />

Field t ria l s were establi shed i n 1988-9 0 in Wes t Vi r g i n i a , Virginia , a n d<br />

Haryl a n d t o ev aluate terba cil at r e du c e d rates fo r the cont rol of common<br />

chickw ee d CStc Ha r l a med ia L. ) and henbi t. ( Lami um ampl exic aule L.) i n<br />

seed l i ng and esta b li sh e d al f alfa .<br />

He r b ic ide trea tments were appl i ed i n wa t e r to 6 X 12 or 6 X 25 fo o t plots<br />

usin g fl at fan s p ray tip s mount e d on a c omp r e s s e d air plot spra y er ca li br a t e d<br />

t o de l ive r a se t v o l ume of wate r .<br />

Four ra t e s; 0.20, 0. 27 , 0.40, and 0.60 Lb s ai/a, of ter bacU herbicide<br />

were appli ed at two timin g s , l ate fall and l a t e winter.<br />

Al l treatments o f terbacil a p p lied at bo th timin g s co n t r o lle d h e nbi t . A<br />

r a te o f 0 .27 Los a i/ a was neces s ar y t o co ntr o l common c h ick we e d in the fa l l<br />

a n d a r a t e of 0.40 lbs ai /a was nee ded to obt a i n c ontro l i n l ate wi nter. In<br />

ge ne r a l , a s th e rate of t erba cil increased the co ntro l of h en bit and common<br />

ch ickw e e d in cr e as ed irr es p e c t i ve of timing. See d ling a lfalfa injur y<br />

incr e a s e d a s the rate o f terb a c i l incr eased; however , all rates had<br />

acce p t ab l e cro p injur y ra tin g s of less than 18%. There were s i mi l a r crop<br />

injury r a t i n g s f rom f all a pp li cat i on s vers u s late wi n te r applica tion s wh e n<br />

compa r ing equa l r a t e s of terbac i l .<br />

IDev e l op ment Repres ent a ti ve , Agricultural Produc ts De p a r t me n t ,<br />

E. l . d u Pon t de Ne mou r s a nd Comp a ny , Win cheste r, VA 22601 .<br />

l ASsoc La t e Profe ss or, Depart me nt of Plant Path o lo gy , Phy s i o log y an d<br />

u e e d Sci ence , Vi:g~~ ~ a Poly tec h nic Institute a nd St a t e Un ive rs i t y,


133<br />

Control of Canada Thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Seop.]<br />

on Highway Rights-o f-Way<br />

- Or .<br />

Why I'll never be out of a job in weed control.<br />

W.J. Chism, S. W. Bingham , an d R.L. Shaver'<br />

ABSTRACf<br />

Canada thistle is an herbaceous. perennialweed increasingly being found on highway<br />

rights-of-way in Virginia. It's prolific seed production and extensive rhizomes make it an<br />

excellent invading species in disturbedsites. Spring herbicide treatments were chosen to<br />

selectively control Ca nada thistle (Qiliwn = L.) Scop.) in tall fescue (f2l!~<br />

L.) and trailing crownvet ch (~ Yl!ril!L.).<br />

TALL FESC UE<br />

Test plots at Staunton, VA comparedApril versus May treatments for Canada thistle<br />

control. The best control of Canada thistle and turf qualitywere provided by triclopyr +<br />

clopyra lid (0.63 + 0.21 & 0.94 + 0.32) and clopyralid (0.28 & 0.42 kg/hal. An ilizene<br />

produced veryrapid growthreduction in Canada thistle initially (90%) but did not provide<br />

adequate control after 2 months at this site. Treatment time did not influence Canada<br />

thistle control.<br />

Test plots at w ytheville, VA compared Aprilversus May treatmentsfor Canada thistle<br />

control. The best control of Canada thistle and turf qualityat this site were provided by<br />

2,4-D (2.8 kg/ hal, triclopyr (2.24 kg/hal , trlclopyr + etopyralid (0.63 + 0.21 & 0.94 + 0.32)<br />

and etopyrali d (0.28 & 0.42 kg/ hal . Anilizene provided moderat e, but not adequate growth<br />

reduction over the course of the experiment. April versus Mayapplication timingsdid nOI<br />

appear to influence weed control.<br />

CROWNVETCH<br />

An experiment was conducted at Bland, VA to test the ability of anilizene to control<br />

Canada thistle in trailing crown vetch. Anilizene has provided inconsistent control of<br />

Canada thistle over the past three years. Control of Canada thistle was not adequate at this<br />

site.<br />

CANADA THISTLE BIOlYPE S<br />

Several authors have described four distinct biotypes of Canadathistle foundin the U.S.<br />

and Canada. Upon examination we determined that our test sites over the past three years<br />

have different biotypes present in them.<br />

Anilizene is thought to act as an inhibitor of<br />

photosystem n. Our work with an SF-lO fluorometer indicates that our biotypes have a<br />

differential response to atrazine. However, the same work indicatesthat anilizene does not<br />

influencewhole leaf fluorescence and did not inhibit PS n. Therefore, the inconsistencies<br />

we are experiencing in controlling Canada thistle may be due to biotype differences in<br />

herbicide sensitivity.<br />

'Research Assoc. Prof . & Lab Spe c., Dept. of Plant Path ., Phy., & <strong>Weed</strong> Sci., Virginia<br />

Polytech. Inst, and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA. 2406 1-0331


134<br />

GIANT FOXTA IL CONTR OL WITH HERB ICIDES APPLIE D TO SOIL WITH AND<br />

WITH OUT SURF ACE RESID UE<br />

Arthur E. Gover. Larry J. Kuhns.and Gregory T. Lyman 1<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

As panof a cooperative project with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, 13 herbicide<br />

combinationswere appliedto an area known to have high giant foxtail ~!llbm. Hemn .) pressure as<br />

well as an accu mulation of surface plant residue. The herbicides includ ed broad spectrum, root abso rbed<br />

herbicides, as well as low-solubility herbicides that work.primarily at the soil surface on gcnninating seeds<br />

and seedlings. TIlCSe herbicides were applied to plots with and without surface residue to determine if the<br />

residue would reducelhe activity of the herbicides. Combinationsof these two types of herbicidesareoften<br />

used under guiderails for lOWvegetation control with theassumption that the low-solubility materials<br />

provide longer activity near the soil surface than the more soil-mobile broad spectrum herbicides.<br />

The herbicides applied were imazapyr, sulfcmeturon methyl. brcmacil. tcbuthiuron. two rates of<br />

diuron. oryzal in.pcndimcthalin, simazinc. isoxaben. metolachlor, oxyfluorfen. and glyphosat e.<br />

Glyphosatewas added with each herbicide and applied alone to thecheck plots to eliminate winter annual<br />

weeds present at application. The applicationrates arclisted in Table I. TIle treatments were applied April<br />

6, 1990 to an area that had been in a no-till rotation of com-oats-fallow for almost 20 years. The application<br />

equipment was a C0 2 powered hand-held sprayer. applying 1741/ha at 2m kPa with Spraying Systems<br />

8004fiat fan nozzles. The experimentaldesign was a randomized complete block with a split-block<br />

treatment arrangement and three replications. with 1.5 by 9.1m herbicide treatment plots. 4.6 by 19.8 m<br />

residue plots. and 1.5 by4.6 m herbicide by residue sub-plots. Surface residue was removed from the roresidue<br />

plots with a tractor mounted York rake. Visual ratings of percent giant foxtail cover were taken<br />

June 29 and October 9. 12 and 26 weeks after treatment (WAT), respectively. An application of 0.56 kg<br />

ai/ha0(2,4- D was made July 6 to remove broadleaf weeds from the experimental area.<br />

When the data was subjected to analysis of variance. the effect of residue wasfound to be<br />

nonsignificant for the June 29 rating (p=O.42),and nearly significant for the October 9 rating (p=0.09).<br />

'Theinteraction between herbicide and residue treatment effects was not significant June 29 (p--o.18), but<br />

was highly significant October 9 (p=O.OCXm.Giant foxtail cover ratings were lower for all herbicides<br />

when applied to bare soil (fab le 1). lmazapyr, isoxabcn, and cxyfluorfen showed the greatest difference in<br />

giant foxtail cover between the two surface conditions. with a 32, 50. and33 percent difference,<br />

respectively, between bare soil and residue plots. Giant foxtail cover in plots treated with sulJometuron<br />

methyl , the high rate of diurcn. and pendimethalin were very similar between the two surface conditions.<br />

Herbicide treatment effects. averaged over soil surface conditions, were highly significant, andall<br />

treatments had significantly less giant foxtail cover than the glyphosate-onlycheck, which wasrated at 62<br />

and 87 pcrcent 12 and 26 WAT, respectively. Sulfometuron methyl, the high rate of diuron, pendimethalin.<br />

bromacil, rebuthiuron, andoryzalin providedexcellent giant foxtail control. The 26 WAT cover ratings for<br />

these treatments ranged between 2 and 13 percent. The low rate of diuron, simazire, metclachlor, and<br />

imazapyr plotshad less than 10perccntgiant foxtail cover when rated 12 WAT, but at 26 WAT these<br />

treatments ranged between 22 and 41 percent giant foxtail cover. Iscxaben andoxyfluorfen did not provide<br />

acceptablecontrol of giant foxtai l,as both were rated at 31percent cover 12 WAT; and47 and 58 percent,<br />

respectively,26 WAT.<br />

Under the conditions of lhis study, the broad spectrum herbicides bromacil, dluron. sulfometuron<br />

methyl. and tebuthiuron provided season long control of giant foxtail andwould nor needto becombined<br />

with low solubility herbicides such as oryzalin and pendimethalin. Oryzalin andpendimethalin could be<br />

combined with broad spectrum herbicides that have little or no residualactivity to control existing vegetation<br />

as well as weeds such as giant foxtail, andreduce the possibility of off-site movement which can occur<br />

with the broad spectrum residual herbicides used in this study. Their use would be limited though, by their<br />

reduced spectrum of control.<br />

ISr. Research Technologist, ProfessorofOmame ntal Horticulture. :mrlPm ip ('l A"ciC'ta nt -r-s, .. o..~~~ ,. 1..__ :_


135<br />

TABLE 1: Percentgian t foxtailcover present in treatments appliedApril 6, 1990, and rated June<br />

29 and October 9, 12 and26 weeks after treatme nt. Values for 12 WATand themeanfor 26 WAT<br />

arethemeanof six observations, andthebaresoil and residuevalue for 26 WAT arethe meanof<br />

threeobservations.<br />

GiantFoxtailCOver<br />

26WAT<br />

Treatment ApplicationRate 12WAT mean baresoil residue<br />

(kg.Oh.) (%) (%) (%) (%)<br />

1. imazapyr + glyphosa te 0.84 + 0.56 41 25 57<br />

2. sulfomeruronmethyl + glyphosate 0.21 + 0.56 0<br />

3. bromacil+ glyphosate 4.48 + 0.56 2 16<br />

4. tebuthiuron+ glyphosare 3.58 + 0.56 15<br />

5. diuron + glyphosate 5.60 + 0.56 22 12 32<br />

6. diuron + glyphosate 11.2 + 0.56 0 4<br />

7. oryza lin + glyphosa te 3.36 + 0.56 13 19<br />

8. pendimethalin+ glyphosate 4.48 + 0.56 0 2<br />

9. simazine + glyphosate 4.48 + 0.56 32 25 38<br />

10. isoxaben + glyphosate 1.12 + 0.56 31 47 22 72<br />

II. metolachlor + glyphosate 4.48 + 0.56 32 23 40<br />

12. oxyfluorfen + glyphosate 0.90 + 0.56 31 58 42 75<br />

13. glyphosate 0.56 62 87 85 88<br />

Significance Level (P) 0.000 1 0.0001 0.0007 1 Coefficientof V ariation (%) 97 47 29<br />

l.s.d. ( P~0.05) 12 16 14<br />

11The significancelevel of the interactionbetweenresidue and herbicidetreatmenteffects.


136<br />

MEYER ZOYSI AGRASS REGROWTH AS INF LUENCED BY HERBI CI DES<br />

P . H . Dernoed en 11<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Est abl i s hme nt of Meye r zoys i a gras s (Zo ys i a iaponic a St e ud .) from veg e t a t ive<br />

plu g s gene ral ly r equ i r e s a minim um o f thr e e g r owi ng eee ec n e r wher e as, e st a b l i s h­<br />

men t f r om sprigs r e qui re s about two gr owi ng se a sons . The o b j e c tive of this s tu d y<br />

was to de t erm ine if esta blishm e nt fr om regro wt h o f h arve s t ed Bod c oul d be<br />

ha s t en e d b y herb ici de s t hat r ed u c e weed compet iti on.<br />

Meye r zo ysiag ra s s wa s es t a b l is he d f r om pl ugs at Si l ve r spri ng, HD i n 19 8 3,<br />

a nd the mat ure st and was har vested in Aug 19 88 . On 10 Apr 198 9, th e area was<br />

li ght ly roto tilled a nd t he si t e was se pa r a te d int o two ar e a s. Ar e a I was han d<br />

ra ked to remove al l l o o s e ne d plant debris; wher eas , Area I I was not raked and s od<br />

rib bons and deb ris were all owe d t o r ema i n i n p l a c e . Both are a s were rolled , and<br />

herb i cide s wer e app lied over p rim ari ly ba reg round in Area I an d ba regrou nd plus<br />

plan t debris in Ar ea II. Plots were 5 by 10 ft a nd a r rang e d in a random ized<br />

compl ete block with either four (Area II) or fi ve (Area I ) rep l ication s per<br />

tre a tment. The he rbicides (di thiopyr at 0.5 Ib /A; pendim etha lin a t 3 .0 I b / Ai<br />

prodiamine at 0.65 Ib /A i DCPA a t 10 .5 lb /A ; oxadi azon at 3.0 lb / A; fenoxapr op at<br />

0.3 5 l b / A and qui nc lo ra c at 1. 5 I b/A) we r e app lied at xec ommende d times in 50 gpa<br />

:it;:g e~S~ ~om ~~;~c~~~a~p;::edt:~k l~~x~~ NW/l~~O 2 f~t~~A 2;fJU~~S 1 ~:~, :~~f ~ ~t ~~~ ;<br />

13 Jun e, and 10 Ju ly 1990. Plot a r e a cov e r e d b y weeds or zoysiag r a s s was<br />

det er mi ne d visua lly on a 0 to 100\ scale . All d ata were sub jected t o ana lysis<br />

o f v a r i ance an d sig nifica nt ly d i ff e r e nt mea ns wer e separ a t e d at P = 0.05 by<br />

Du nc a n 's mul t i p l e r a ng e t e s t .<br />

19 89 Re s u l t s<br />

Carpetweed (~ v e r t i c i l l a t a L.) . an d smooth c r ab g rass (Digit a ria<br />

i sc ha e mum ( Sc hr e b.j Muhl . ) wer e the p rim ary weed compet i to rs . In Area I ,<br />

c ar pe t wee d was eff ecti vely cont rolled by al l p r eeme rgence he rb i c ides , bu t no t by<br />

fenox ap rop o r quinclorac. Crabgr ass was reduced significant ly b y a l l treatm e n t s .<br />

Exce pt for pendime th alin a nd p rodiami ne (22 -23\ zoysi a cov e r), most her b i cid es<br />

(24 - 34\ zo y s i a c o ver ) enhanced t he c ompe t i t i v e ne s s of Me y e r s i g n i f i c a nt l y , when<br />

comp a r ed to untreated pl ot s (13\ zoysia cover) .<br />

I n Area II, o nl y pendim e t h ali n. p rodiamine and oxadi azon had provided<br />

effe ctive preemergence carpetweed control; wher eas, al l herbic id e s had p r-ov Lde.d<br />

exc e l l ent crabgr ass control. By 13 s e pt it was e v i de n t t h a t al l h er bi ci d e s (5B ­<br />

69\ zoys i a c o v er ), e x c e p t qui nc l o rac (4B\ zo y s i a cove r), wer e a s s o c i a t e d with a<br />

s igni ficant i nc r e a s e i n Meye r c o ver wh e n c ompar ed t o u ntrea t ed p lo t s ( 3 1\ zo y s i a<br />

co ver ) . Th is i ncreas e i n zoy siagras s c ov er was a ttri b ut e d to t he r e d uct ion of<br />

c r a bg r a ss c ompe t i t io n accord e d b y t he her bic ides.<br />

199 0 Resu lt s<br />

He rbicide r at e s were r e d uce d in 199 0 an d all p re e mergence herb i c i d e s<br />

provid ed excellent c r a bg r a s s c on t ro l in Area I . Fe nox a pr op a nd quinclo r a c h ad<br />

re duced cr ab g r a ss, but t he leve l of c o nt r o l was only 73\ . Her bic i de us e in Ar ea<br />

I was a s s oc i a t e d wi th signific a ntly grea te r zoy siagrass co ve r r a t i ng s (92 - 97 \)<br />

when co mp a.re d to un treated plots (BB\ c over) o n 9 Oct 19 90.<br />

I n Area II , all herbi cide s prov ided exc e llent crabgrass co ntrol beca use<br />

zo y s i a g r a s s c o ver was v e ry h igh in s p r i ng 1990 a nd weed compe t i tion was the r efor e<br />

not a s se ve re as it was in Ar e a I . Zoysiagr a s s co ver was sig n i f i c a n t l y highe r<br />

(98 -100\ cover) in her bicide -t r e at ed p lo ts t ha n untreated pl ot s (95\ cov e r) o n<br />

9 Oct 19 90.<br />

Re s ult s o f t h i s stu dy s howe d t ha t herb i c id e use sig ni f i c a nt ly red u c e d wee d<br />

co mp e t i t io n a nd a s si s t ed in s pe e d i ng zoy siagrass gr owth. None of t he herbi c ides<br />

was p hyto t oxi c , a nd none wa s a ss oc iated wi t h a r e d u ction in t he g rowth or


137<br />

ras<br />

EFFECf OF APPLICAnON TIMING ON 11ffi ACTIVITY OF PLANT o a owra<br />

REGULATORS APPLIED TO TALL FESCUE<br />

Arthur E. Gover. Thomas Lwarschke,<br />

and Greg ory T. Lyman"<br />

ABSTRACf<br />

Previous research at Penn State2Jhas suggested that different plant growth regulators (POR's)<br />

have different periods of peakactivity between the breaking of dormanc y and seedhead emergence<br />

on unmow n tall fescue~ arundina cea Schreb.). This study wasinitiated as part of a<br />

cooperative research project with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation to determine if<br />

different plant grow th regulator combi nations demonstrated differe nt activity peaks within the premow<br />

application window.<br />

MATERIALSAND METHODS<br />

The study site was seeded in the spring of 1987 to a blend of' Cimmaro n', 'Bonanza ', and<br />

'Olympic' turf type tall fescues. Prior to 1990. the area received 60 kg of fertilizer nitrogen/he<br />

annually. and was maintained at a height of 9 em. The experimental design was randomized<br />

complete block with a split-plot treatment arrangement with three replications. Each 5.5 by 4.6 m<br />

application timing whole plot was divided into six 0.9 by 4.6 PGR treat ment sub-plots. The<br />

application times were April 23, April 27, May 2, May 8, and May 14, 1990. The PGR treatment s<br />

were mefluidide (N 2,4-dirnethyl- S-([lrifluorornethyl) sulfonyl] amino] phenyl] acetamide) at 420<br />

g ai/ha; chlorsu lfuron (2-chloro -N -[[4-methoxy-6-methyl-I,3,S-lriazin-2-yl) amino] carbony l]<br />

benzenesulfonamide) at 26.2 g ai/ha; mefluidide plus chlorsulfuron at 210 plus 13.1 g ailha; a<br />

commercial premix of imazethapyr and imazapyr31( (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-( I­<br />

methylethy l)-S-oxo-IH -imidazo l-2-yl]-S-ethyl-3-pyridi necarbo xylic acid and (±)-2- [4 ,S-dihyctro­<br />

4-methyl-4-(l- rne'h ylethyl)-S-oxo- IH -imidazol-2-ylj -3-pyridi necarboxylic acid), at 98.4 and 3.8<br />

g ai/ha; mefluidide plus the premix of imazethapyr and imazapyr at 140 plus 49.1 plus 1.9 g ai/ha,<br />

respectively; and an untreated check. The treatments were applied with a CO2powered hand held<br />

sprayer delivering 16111haat 207 kPa using Spray ing Systems 8002 flat fan nozzles. All PGR<br />

treatments included dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) at 0.56 kg ailha and a spray<br />

adjuvantv at 0.25 % v/v. Initial visual ratings of turf color and turf quality were taken May 15 for<br />

the April 23 applications; May 29 for the April 27, May 2, and May 8 applications; and June 5 for<br />

the May 14 application. All plots were visually rated for percent seedhead suppression, turf color,<br />

and turf qual ity July 2 Seedhead suppressio n ratings were based on the untreated check within<br />

each application time whole plot Turf colo r and qual ity were rated on a 0 to 9 scale, with 9 being<br />

ideal, 0 dead turf, and 5 acceptable. When the data was subjected to analysis of variance, the<br />

interaction between application time and PGR treatments was highly significant for all dependent<br />

variables.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Initial color ratings for mefluidide at 420 g ai/ha were acceptable and consistent for all<br />

applications. Turf quality ratings decreased for later applications as the turf grew taller with a more<br />

uneven canopy compared to other treatments. ~h.e:ad..'\IPJ.m:~.'i.'i i.m" 4ta1 j JlF-t" Ja..~ r..Ill)"'" ",rot!"<br />

goodto excellem for appli cations made April 23 and 27. then decreasedsignific antly for the M ay 2<br />

1/ St. Researtb i ecbno\ogisl, Prof essor of iurfgrass <strong>Science</strong>, and Projec t Assistant. 1be Pennsylvania State<br />

University.<br />

11Gover, A.E.• TL. Watschke, G.T. Lyman. 1990. Effect of Application Timin g on Embark and Esco rt<br />

Combinations. Roadside vegeiauon Management Researc h Report - Fourth Year Report, Report NPA 90-4620<br />

+ 85.08. Availab le from National Technical Informatio n Service. Springfie ld. VA.<br />

31Event, American Cyanimid Company , Wayne . Nl .<br />

41Cidckick Il, lLB Inc.• Vero Beach, A..


138<br />

application. Turf color and quality ratin gs taken July 2 followed the same trend as the seedhead<br />

suppress ion ratings . The color decline appeared to be due to the begin ning of leaf senescenc e, and<br />

the quality decli ne was due to increas ing prese nce of seed heads and an uneven canopy. and less<br />

favorable color ratings.<br />

Chlorsulfuro n at 26.2 g ai/ha showed an improved initial color rating betwee n the Apr il 23 and<br />

27 applica tion dates, then no change with subsequent applications. The initial quality ratings were<br />

more varied, thou gh accep table , and did not show any overa ll trend . Seedhea d suppression was<br />

nor accep table for the April 23 and 27, and May 2 applications, but improve d to accepta ble levels<br />

for the May 8 and 14 app licatio ns. Whe n rated July 2, turf color and quality were con sistent and<br />

acceptab le for all application dates . The combina tion of mefluidi de and chlorsu lfuron , prod uced<br />

barely accepta ble initial color ratings for the April 23 and 27 applica tions. Turf color ratings<br />

improved with the later applications, but this comb ination consistently rece ived the lowest initial<br />

turf color ratings . Initial turf quality relative to the other treatments changed from worst rated for<br />

April 23 to best rated for May 14, despite a change of on ly 6.3 to 7.0. July 2 ratings of seed head<br />

suppression, turf color, and turf quality were good to excelle nt for all application dates.<br />

The commerc ial premix of imazethapyr and imazapyr showed initial turf color and turf quality<br />

ratings between 6.3 and 7.0 for all application dates. Seedhead suppress ion was good to excellen t<br />

for all appl ication date s, as was turf color and turf quality when rated July 2. Add ing mefluidide to<br />

the premix of imazethapyr and imazapyr prod uced initial turf color rati ngs that were cons istently<br />

lower , though acceptab le, than the premix alo ne. Initial turf quality differences betwee n the two<br />

treatme nts were not apparen t. Meflu idide plus the prem ix consistently prov ided excellent seedhead<br />

suppression, and was amo ng the highest for Jul y 2 color and quality ra tings .<br />

The untreated chec k received the highest initial turf color ratings for each application date. The<br />

initial turf quality rating fell dramatically to unaccepta ble levels after the Apri l 23 applicatio n due to<br />

the uneven appearanc e resulting from unchecked growt h. Seedhead pressu re was different<br />

betwee n the check plots, but was alway s rated 0 perce nt suppressio n. July 2 ratings of turf color<br />

were barely accepta ble as leaf senescence was occurring , and turf quality was unacceptable due to<br />

the prese nce of seed head s and uneven canop y growt h.<br />

Under the conditio ns of this study, mefl uidide showe d greater activity on tall fesc ue in earlier<br />

applications. Whe n combi ned with a reduced rate of chlorsu lfuron, early app lications caused more<br />

discoloration , but seedhead suppression was improved. Similar results were found when<br />

mefl uidide was combi ned with a com merc ial premix of imazethapyr and imazap yr, though<br />

improveme nts in seed head suppress ion were not as pronounced as with chlorsu lfuron.


139<br />

TABLE 1: Visualratingsof rurf color, turf Quality, andpercentseedhead suppression forPGR<br />

treatments appliedat five differentdates to tall fescue. Turfcolor and turfquality ratings wereon a<br />

oto 9 scale, with0 indicatingdead turf, and9 being ideal.Seedhead suppression was rated based<br />

on the untreatedcheck foreach applicationdate. Eachvalueis themeanof three observations.<br />

3-4 WAT July 2 1990<br />

Application Tun Turf Sdhd . Turf Turf<br />

Dale Products<br />

Rate<br />

Co lor Quality<br />

Sfo-~f ~u~) . (0-9) (6=9)<br />

?o'!9)<br />

4/23 mefluidide 420 7.0 7.3 90 7.0 7.3<br />

4/23 chlorsulfuron 26.2 5.7 6.7 67 7.0 6.7<br />

4/23 mefluidide + chlorsulfuron 210 + 13.1 5.0 6.3 93 7.0 7.7<br />

4/23 imazethapyr + imazapyrt/ 98 + 3.8 6.3 7.0 83 7.0 7.0<br />

4/23 mefluidide+ imazethapyr+ imazpyr 140+4 9+ 1.9 5.3 6.7 93 7.0 7.0<br />

4/23 untreated check 8.0 7.3 0 5.0 4.3<br />

4/27 mefluidide 420 6.7 5.7 85 6.3 7.0<br />

4/27 chlorsul furon 26.2 6.3 6.3 48 7.0 7.0<br />

4(27 mefluidide + chlorsulfuron 210 + 13.1 5.3 6.3 92 7.0 7.7<br />

4/27 imazetha pyr + imazapyr 98 + 3.8 6.3 6.7 92 6.7 7.3<br />

4/27 mefluidi de + imazethapyr + imazpyr 140 +4 9 +1. 9 5.7 6.7 92 6.7 7.3<br />

4/27 untreated check 8.0 4.7 0 5.0 4.0<br />

5/2 rre fluidide 420 7.0 5.3 8 5.0 4.0<br />

5/2 chlorsulfuron 26.2 6.3 6.7 65 7.0 6.3<br />

5/2 mefluidide+ chlorsulfuron 210 + 13.1 6.0 6.7 83 7.0 7.0<br />

5/2 imazethapyr+ imazapyr 98 + 3.8 6.3 6.7 87 6.7 6.7<br />

5/2 mefluidide + imaze thapyr + imazpyr 140 + 49 + 1.9 6.0 7.0 95 7.3 7.7<br />

5/2 untreatedcheck 8.0 4.7 0 5.0 4.0<br />

5/8 mefluidide 420 7.3 5.3 13 5.0 4.7<br />

5/8 chlorsulfuron 26.2 6.3 5.7 80 7.0 6.7<br />

5/8 mefluidide + chlorsulfuron 210 + 13.1 6.3 6.3 90 7.7 7.3<br />

5/8 imazethapyr+ imazapyr 98 + 3.8 7.0 6.3 83 6.3 6.3<br />

5/8 mefluidide+ imazeth apyr + imazpyr 140 + 49 + 1.9 6.7 6.7 90 7.0 7.3<br />

5/8 untreatedcheck 8.0 4.3 0 5.0 4.0<br />

5/14 me fluidide 420 6.7 4.7 55 5.7 5.3<br />

5/14 chlorsulfuron 26.2 6.3 6.3 83 7.0 6.7<br />

5/14 mefluidide + chlorsulfuron 210 + 13.1 6.0 7.0 95 7.3 7.0<br />

5/14 imazethapyr + imazap yr 98 + 3.8 6.3 6.7 97 7.0 7.7<br />

5/14 mefluidide+ imazethapyr+ imazpyr 140 +49+ 1.9 6.0 6.3 93 7.0 7.0<br />

5/!4 untreated check 7.7 4.0 0 5.0 4.0<br />

Signi fican ce Level (P)<br />

cv. (%)<br />

0.042 0.00 1 0.001 0.001 0.001<br />

5 10 13 6 8<br />

LSD (P=0.05) 0.6 1.0 14 0.6 0.8<br />

1/A commercial premix , Event, American Cyanim id Company, Wayne, NJ


140<br />

eGA 163935 ALONE AND IN COMBINATION<br />

WITH OTHER GROWTH REGULATORS IN TALL FESCUE 1<br />

2<br />

ADRIAN J . ENACHE and RICHARD D. ILNICKI<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The experimenta l turf growth regu lator, eGA 163935, was<br />

evaluated in two studies at the Adelphia Research Center, Free ho ld,<br />

N.J. The objectives of this research were to determine if th e r e<br />

were differences in turf growth regulation and t urf response (i)<br />

when eGA 163935 was applied alone and in combination with three<br />

other growth regulators, and (ii) when sequential applications of<br />

eGA 163935 were used .<br />

All treatments were applied to tall fescue (Festuca<br />

arundinacea Schreb.). For the first study, treatments were applied<br />

at turf green -up (April 12, 1990) and included eGA 163935 at two<br />

rates (0 .6 and 0 .8 kg ai ha" l), mefluidide, maleic hydrazide, and<br />

primisu lforon alone and in combinations with CGA 163935. Treatments<br />

for the second study were applied April 12 and May 23, 1990 and<br />

included CGA 163935 at four rates (0 .2, 0 .4, 0 .6 , and 0 .8 kg a i<br />

ha "} applied alone at turf green-up and followed by a second<br />

application of various CGA 163935 rates. Each study consisted of<br />

three replicates in a randomized block design. Turf color and<br />

injury were rated and number of seedheads counted periodicaly in<br />

each study. In the second study turf height and fresh weig ht of<br />

clippings were recorded also .<br />

No injury to the turf was observed at two weeks after<br />

treatment (WAT) with CGA 163935 applied alone . Combinations with<br />

high rates of mefluidide and primisulfuron caused temporary turf<br />

injury. All CGA 163935 applications, either single or split,<br />

significantly reduced turf height compared to unmowed check;<br />

however , no differences between the mowed check and all treatments<br />

resulted. Sequential application of CGA 163935 at 0 .4 and 0.8 kg<br />

ai ha· 1 seemed to be the most effective in reducing t he t u r f height .<br />

CGA 163935 applied a l on e reduced the number of seedheads compared<br />

to unmowed check; no reductions were observed compared to mowed<br />

check . Hig her rates of CGA 163935 with mefluidide and primisulfuron<br />

were more effective than lower rates wh i l e the combinations with<br />

maleic hydrazide wer e more effective at lower ra tes . Single<br />

application of CGA 163935 did not reduce fresh weight of clipp ings.<br />

Sequential application reduced fresh weight at 10 WAT. At 14 WAT,<br />

fresh weights of all, single or sequential, applications of CGA<br />

163935 were lower than the unmoved check a nd simi lar to that of the<br />

12 times mowed check .<br />

This indicat ed that either single or sequential applications<br />

of CGA 1639 35 wer e capab le to replace 10 to 12 turf mowings during<br />

a season .<br />

, New Jersey Agric . EXp. Stn. Publication No. J-15 173 - 1-90.<br />

2 P""c: l'tc:c.n('" ",nn P""c: Pl"'nf" W""""n~,..i ,...pl=:np("!t"ivplv _ (',...on ~,.. i.


141<br />

RESPONSE OF SEVERAL TURF GRASSES TO CGA-I63935 .<br />

D. B. Vitolo, R. Brooks. S. W. Pruss and P. J. Porpiglia 1<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

inh i bit i~:C-~J:;~S~f=;:~~~~~ti~:~ ~;~~~j~~ead~:~ for vegetative<br />

Effective use rate s ofCG A-163935 vary from 200 to 1000 g:.:fha. Factors which<br />

~~U~~~:t[~~eoitd~~rr~ :i~8:iti~~ : (fs~i~~~~nh~~b~e~n~r~~d~h iC~;~~~~~~PP roxi _<br />

mately 50% growth inhibit ion for four weeks.<br />

CGA-163935 was evaluated in 1990 for cool-season turfgrass inhibition in field tri als<br />

~r1=~ ~::~~Y~~~Jf~~~~ &gr~~:fes~erf~~t),~~e:i~ded<br />

ryegrass (YiliJlm==L ). and Kentucky bluegrass (flla IlIllill!SisL) .<br />

CGA -163935 at 1000 g aifha applied to tall fescue reduced clipping fresh weights by<br />

50% over a six week period. An 800 g ai/ ha rate reduced the number of mowings by 50%<br />

over a seven week period. This single 800 g ai/h a application provided mowing reductions<br />

comparable to two applicat ions of either 400, 600, or 800J ai/ ha apElied 30 days apart.<br />

~:i~h:tf~di~~~~1 R:~a;~~~~~f~~~tz<br />

:~~:S ~~d:C:d\~~:e7~<br />

eight week peri od following two applications of 800 g aifi;a applied at 30 day intervals.<br />

Augu s t~~e~~:(St~~~~~~h~~o~-[\t~:'r ~~~~b~hi~~~~t(r:~lfu ~nn~iatum<br />

Fluegge), and Bermudagrass (~~ [L ] Pers.}for general turfgrass inhibition<br />

and as an edging compound.<br />

Single applications of CGA-163935 at 800 g ai/ha reduced the numbe r of mowings<br />

of St. Augustinegrass, bahiagrass, and bermudagrass 66%, 57%, and 33%, respectively, for<br />

a period of seven weeks.<br />

Turfgr ass toler ance to CGA-163935 has been excellent. Th ree successive years<br />

of 3000 g ai/ ha per year, applied in 1000 g ai/ ha increme nts during the growing season,<br />

have shown no adverse effects on tall fescue. Three successive years of 4000 ~ ai/ ha ap-<br />

C~h~~~~~gi~ /l;~n~ r~ih~ t~;;li:d~~:80n: ~~h~rs~c~~f:~~~~h~~~\lFo: ~~~~~e~~e<br />

effects on Kentucky bluegrass or common Bermudagrass for one and two years, respectively.


142<br />

SUMMARYOF THE BAS 514 00 H EUP<br />

PROGRAMRESULTS ON NORTHEASTERN TURF<br />

Ric har d R. Eva ns l , Greg Roman , Willia m Sc iarappa<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

BASF Corporation c ondu c t e d an EUP program in 199 0 wi t h BAS<br />

5 14 00 H for the control of gras s and broadleaf weeds in turf.<br />

The national program a l l owed the usage on 107 hectares of turf i n<br />

a l l a r e a s of the Unit ed state s . In the Nor t h e a s t, app lic ations<br />

were made in Maryl and, Delaware , Virginia, Pennsylvani a, New York ,<br />

New Jer sey and Ohio . Over 40 trials were condu cted on golf<br />

cour s e s , commercial turf , and s por t s turf at 0.2 to 1.6 hectares<br />

p er site . Applic ation rates r anged from 1 .7 to 2.2 5 kg /hectare<br />

app l i ed postem er genc e i n 24 t o 220 l ite rs of water per he ctare.<br />

The turf spe ci e s pr e s ent at each site were usuall y 2- and 3-way<br />

mix t ure s of p erenni al ryegrass (Lolium perenne L . ), Ken t u c ky<br />

bl u e grass (Po a p r at e ns is L .), t all fescue (Fe stu c a a ru nd ina c e a<br />

Sc h re b. ) and f i n e fes c u e (Fes t uca s p eci e s ) or be rmud a gra ss<br />

(cyno d on da ctyl on Pe rs . ) or b ent grass (Ag r o s t i s p a lu str i s Huds.) .<br />

App l ica t i on d at e s r a ng ed fro m June 5 to Aug u s t 15 f or the initi a l<br />

app lica t i on with subsequ en t a pp lica ti ons, if n e ed ed, mad e<br />

app rox im a t e ly 30 da y s la t e r . Use rs indi c at e d th eir e val ua t io n of<br />

t h e co nt r o l of ea ch wee d b y c he c ki ng th e ap pr op r i at e box l abel l e d<br />

exce l l e nt , g ood, fair or po or .<br />

Injur y t o tu r f was ve r y lo w to non e . Goo d to exc e l l en t<br />

con t ro l of s mooth c r ab grass (Dig it ari a i s chae mum Sc hr e b . e x<br />

Sc hwe i g. ) , large c ra bg rass (p igit ari a s anguin ali s L .) , y ellow<br />

f ox t a i l (Setari a gl au c a L.), d an d elion (Tara xa cum o f f ic i na l e<br />

Web er), veroni c a spec ies , bu ckhorn plantain (Pl antago la nceol at a<br />

L .) a n d white clo v er (Trifolium r ep ens L .) was obtained at the<br />

rate s used . Some wee ds not controll e d we r e br oadl ea f pla ntai n<br />

(Pl antago major L .), pr o s t r a t e kn ot we ed (P ol ygon um a y ic u la r e L .),<br />

mou seea r chick wee d (Ce r a stium vulg atu m L.), goosegra s s (E l eu s ine<br />

i ndica L .) and n i mb lew i l l (Muhl enb erg i a schr e ber i J . F . Gme l . ).<br />

1BASF Corp or ati on , P . O. Box 13528 , Resea r ch Tr ian gl e Pa r k, NC<br />

27709 - 3528


NUMBER OF LOCATIONS THAT RANKED THE CONTROL OF TURF<br />

WEEDS WITH BAS 514 00 H<br />

NUMBER OF LOCATIONS<br />

RATE<br />

Kglha DIGSPN SETSPN TRFRE u VERSPN TAROF" PLALAo°<br />

--<br />

E' G' F" P' E G F P E G F P E G F P E G F P EGFP<br />

0.84· 15 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 12 2 1 1 3 1 - - 3 5 3 3 3 2 1 1<br />

1.12 13 3 1 - 1 14 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 1<br />

OXAST" •<br />

E"GFP<br />

- 3<br />

PLAMA ' O<br />

E"GFP<br />

2 2<br />

TOTAL 28 4 3 1 4 1 2 1 26 4 2 1 5 4 1 - 5 8 5 3 6 3 1 2<br />

LOCATIONS<br />

- 7 3 -27<br />

*INFORMATION IS GROUPEO FOR DIGITARIA SPECIES (DIGSP), SETARIA SPECIES (SETSP) AND VERONICA SPECIES (YERSP)<br />

...<br />

w<br />

• E _ EXCELLENT CONTROL<br />

G • GOOD CONTROL<br />

F . FAIR CONTROL<br />

P • POOR CONTROL<br />

•• WSSACO DES


144<br />

BAS 5 14 H - APPROACHES TO S ELECT IV I TY AND EFFICACY<br />

IN BENTGRA SS AND BLUEGRASS<br />

Wi l l ia m J. sc t .are ppe -<br />

ABST RACT<br />

Fi e l d st u d i e s were conduc t ed in 19 9 0 wit h BAS 514 H (BAS F ­<br />

quinc hloracj p ropo sed) i n order to improve e f ficacy against<br />

bucxhoxnynar-rowkeef plan tain (Plantago lanceolata L . ] i n Kent uc k y<br />

b lue g r ass (Pa a pra te nsis L.] turf a nd t o improve se lec t iv i ty in<br />

Pe nncros s cre eping be nt g rass [Ag r os ti s pa l ustri s Huds . ] tur f wh i l e<br />

co nt r o l l i ng h airy cr ab gras s (Di g i tar i a s anguina lis L. ] .<br />

Contro l o f b uc kh orn plan tain i n b lue gr a s s with a s in g le<br />

postemergence app licatio n of BAS 514 H at .38,.5 ,.75 o r 1 . a Ib s<br />

ai /a pl US su r f a c t a nt (BAS 090 02 5 at 1 qtja] du r ing ea r ly Ju ne,<br />

mid Ju l y or late Se pt ember ranged from ca. 30 t o 60 \:. seq uenti a l<br />

a pp l ic a t ion s at l ow rat e s 30 da ys af t e r t he fi r s t s pr a y<br />

s i gn i f i ca nt l y impro ved cont r o l at the mi d -summ e r peri od . s equential<br />

a pp l i c a t io ns of BAS 514 H I 0 . 75 + .25 Ib s a i/ a , . 5 +. 5 l bs a i/a or<br />

. 375 +.375 Ibs ai/ a] ach i eved ove r 90% con t r ol. No inj ur y occ ur r e d<br />

at any t r eat me nt r at e to Kentuc ky bluegr a ss .<br />

Contro l of ti llered hai ry crabg r ass i n bentg ra ss was r e l ated<br />

to ra t e of BAS 514 H an d t he mowing he i ght . Lower cu t cra bgrass was<br />

con t rol le d mor e ea s ily an d high er rat e s provided bett er e f fi c ac y .<br />

At . 38 lb s ai/ a, cont r ol r an ged fr om 70% [3/ 16 in ch cut ] to 52% [1<br />

to 2 in ch cu t] . At .5 an d. 75 lb s ai/ a , co nt r o l ra nge d from 59% to<br />

78% an d fr om 83% t o 93%, r e s pec t i vely . Sequen tial ap p l i cat ion s of<br />

.5 l bs a i/a increased control at all ra tes and mowi ng heights t o<br />

over 90%.<br />

Be ntg r as s t ol e r a nc e t o BAS 514 H sh owe d a n i ntegr a t ed<br />

r e l at ion sh ip o f r a te , mowing heigh t, and th e u se of a c he l a ted i r on<br />

so urce c oup l e d with a l ow bur n , t i me d releas e, liquid nitrogen<br />

fertili ze r . Shor te r mowi ng he i ght s a nd hi gher r at es decreas e d tur f<br />

quality. At 7 days afte r trea tment , the unt rea te d bent gr a s s t ur f<br />

was r at e d as 8 on a color /quality scale o f 1 to 10 . Quality of<br />

ben tg rass t reated wi th BAS 514 H at .75 lbs ai/a a ver a ged 5.83 i n<br />

the 3/16 inch put t ing green cu t, 6.50 in t he 5/16 i nch co l lar c ut,<br />

7.17 in the .5 inch fairway c ut and 7.33 in t he 1 t o 2 in ch r oug h<br />

c ut. At .5 a nd . 38 lb s ai/ a , qual i ty i mpr ov e d an d was rated<br />

r e sp ecti vely a t 6 .33 a nd 6 .33 in the gr e en, 7. 33 and 8.0 in t he<br />

colla r, 7.83 and 8 . a in t he fai rway a nd 7.33 and 7 .5 in the r ough .<br />

The incl usion of t he iron chela te/ low burn fer t i l i ze r in to the .75<br />

lb ai/a r a t e of BAS 514 H improved t ur f quality dr ama t i c a l l y t o<br />

7 .17, 7.50, 7.67 and 7.67 at the inc reasing mowin g hei ght s.<br />

Simi la r tr e nds were recorded 20 a nd 42 days a ft er i ni t ial<br />

t r e atm e nt s. Si ngl e or se que nt ia l appl ica t i on s of BAS 514 H late in<br />

t he sea son at .5 lbs ai/a + BAS 090 02 S s ur f a c ta nt , iron chelate<br />

and l iquid N fer t i l izer sh owe d ex c e pti onal s a f e ty at a l l he i ght s .<br />

1\ Field Development, AgriCUltural Chemicals, BASF , Nep tune , NJ 07753


145<br />

Abstract<br />

TURP GRAB B ROOT L ENGTH, STRENGTH , AIm HASS RESPONSE TO QUINCLORAC.<br />

R. D. s terling, D. R. ca r l s on , D. E. Dougherty .<br />

Qui ncl o rac (BAS 514 ) is a n e xpe r imen tal h er bici d e bei ng<br />

developed b y BASF for ea r ly posteme r gence c r abgra s s a nd br oa d l e a f<br />

weed control in t u r f . Many dinitroanilin e s u s ed for pr e eme rg e n c e<br />

crabgrass control in turf have delet erious effec t s on roo t growth.<br />

Thre e sepa rate approaches were used to determ i ne whe the r qu i n cl or a c<br />

inh ibited r o ot le ngt h , s t re ngt h , an d mass as comp a r e d to the<br />

commercia l s tandard pe nd irne t ha li n.<br />

A petri dish a ssay wi t h pre germ in a te d co r n was us ed to det er mi ne<br />

if quinclo rac inh ibited r oot growth. Si lic a san d was t reat e d with<br />

30 mis of dilute h e r b i c i d e so lution. Th e so lut ion co nc e ntrations<br />

of quinclorac were appl ied at 2.0, 1.0, and 0 .5 ppm. Pe ndime t halin<br />

was app lied at 3. a and 1. 5 ppm . Treatme nt s were r e p l ica t e d t hr e e<br />

time s . Af ter twenty four hou r s , quin c l or ac inh ibited r oot gro wt h<br />

14%, 3%, a nd 0% at 2.0 , 1. 0 , a nd 0 . 5 ppm , resp e ctive l y. Th e<br />

pend imetha li n t reat e d s e ed l i ng s exh i b i te d 81 % inhibition at 3.0 pp m<br />

and 58% at 1.5 ppm . Cor n see dl i ngs t r e at ed wi th p e ndi methalin h a d<br />

swollen meristems, while the q u incl orac roo ts ap p eared normal.<br />

To det ermine he rbicide aff ec ts on r o ot mass , for ty -two 0 .45<br />

lite r pots were filled wit h a s a nd y l oa m s o i l a nd wate r e d t o field<br />

capacity. Th e ba re soi l was spr a y e d wi th qu in clorac a t 2 .0, 1. 0 ,<br />

a nd 0. 5 kg/ha, a nd wi t h p endimeth alin at 3 .0 a nd 1. 5 kg/ha . Each<br />

t r e at me nt con taine d s even r ep lic a t i ons . Af t e r the soi l was<br />

trea ted, a mixed sod of "x e n b.Iue ' b lu e g ras s/ 'Rebe l ' t a ll fe sc u e was<br />

placed on the soil sur face a nd al lo wed to grow fo r f our months.<br />

After four months, the ro ot mass was cu t b e low th e sod. The r o ot s<br />

were then washed, dried and weighed. Bot h compo u nd s aff e c ted<br />

turf g rass r oo t mass. Treatments wit h quin c l or a c re s ulted in a 19 ,<br />

17, an d 15% dec rease in r o ot ma s s at 2 . 0 , 1 .0, a nd 0 . 5 kg/ ha,<br />

r e s pe c ti v ely , wh i l e p end imeth alin resu lted in a 36 % decr e ase in<br />

root mass at 3.0 kg/ha a nd a 32% de c rease at 1. 5 kg / h a .<br />

To de termine tu rfgrass r oot s t re ng th , a fi e l d st u dy was<br />

conducted using a dyname te r which measu re s t h e f orce re qu ir e d to<br />

pUll a 929 emil sod piec e f rom t h e ground. The s o il sur f a ce was<br />

trea ted with qui nclor ac a t 2.0, 1. 0, and 0 .5 kg /h a a nd<br />

pe ndi met h a l in a t 3 .0 a nd 1. 5 kg/ha . Met al gr at es were then p lac e d<br />

o ver th e tre at e d area . A mi xe d sod o f ' Kenblue 1 blue grass /<br />

' Re bel' ta l l fescue was p l a c ed over t h e gra t es and all owed to gr ow<br />

from October to Decembe r. When th e sod was pu Lf ed , qu i n cl or a c<br />

treatment resulted in a 4, 3 , and 0% decrea s e a t 2.0 , 1. 0 , and 0.5<br />

kg/ha respectively , whi le pendimetha lin r educed r o ot s t reng th by<br />

36% a t 3.0 kg/ha an d 18% at 1.0 kg/ha .<br />

Quin c l or a c ca u sed l it tle or no inhibition o f roo t l e ng th ,<br />

s t r en gth, or mass in th e mixed turf c omp a re d to pendimethalin .<br />

Further s tudies wi ll be con ducte d t o dete r min e t h e e f f e ct of<br />

quinclo rac on other tur f spec ies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!