Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
96 INHIBI ING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CIRCLING ROOTS IN CONTAINER GROWN ORNAMENTALS WITH ORYZALIN Larry J. Kuhns and Tracey L. Harpster! INTRODUCTION of the factors that limits the length of time a plant can remain in a container, and also vival and growth following outplanting, is the development of a mat of circling roots around the all of the container. Spin Out 2 is a commercially available product that has been proven eff tive in limiting their development on many species of ornamentals. The active ingredient n Spin Out is copper hydroxide, which is carried in a latex paint base. Spin Out is painted on he walls of the containers. When root tips contact the copper they are killed. The injury is I lized, though, and simply results in a more branched root system with little or no effect on t p growth. A concern with Spin Out is the potential for accumulation of high levels of copper ov time in areas in which the containers are painted or in the soil beneath the growing areas. Orjzalin is a potent root inhibitor that in certain situations has stopped root growth without adversely fecting top growth. For example, roots growing out of the bottoms of containers set on oryzali treated soil have been stopped without causing injury to the plants. Since oryzalin is decompos by microorganisms in the soil, its use would have an environmental advantage over the use of pin Out. objectives of this study were to determine the effectiveness of oryzalin in inhibiting the t of circling roots and its effect on plant growth. MEfHODS July 28, 1995 the insides of 2.5 gallon nursery containers were painted with one of the reatments: Spin Out; latex paint' ; or Surflan 4AS4 at 0.1,0.25,0.5,2.0, or 4.0% v/v in the late paint. On July 1 pyracantha (PyracanthacoccineaM.J. Roem.) growing in one quart containers ere planted in the treated pots in a bark/peat medium. There were 12 pots of each treatment d they were maintained in a completely randomized design. Plants were fertilized and watered to maintain optimum growth. On September 12 and November 14, 1995 the plants were rated for c rcling roots on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 = no circling roots and 10 = many circling roots. PIa ts were harvested and weighed on November 15. T pots were held over the winter, and on May 2, 1996, perennial ryegrass (Latium perenne L cv. APM) was seeded into the containers. On July 12 the circling roots were rated and the grass d medium was discarded. July 28 the containers were refilled and ajuga (AjugareplansL. cv. 'Burgundy Glow') in them. Circling roots were rated on October 24, 1996. o April 26, 1996 the insides of two gallon nursery containers were painted with one of the follow ng treatments: 1 application of Spin Out (IX); 2 applications of Spin Out (2X); Surflan at 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0% v/v in latex paint; Spin Out (IX) + 1% Surflan; Spin Out (IX) + 2% Surflan; 1 Prof. of mamental Horticulture and Research Associate,Dept. of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State University, Diversity Park, PA 16802 2 Spin Out, Griffin Corp., Valdosta, GA 31603-1847 3 Dutch B y Extra Acrylic Latex Semi-GlossEnamel (Black 19-90),Cleveland, OH 44115 4 DowEl co, Indianapolis, IN 46268-1054
97 or Surflan at 1% i anti-transpiranti In the Spin Out / Surflan combinations, the Surflan was simply added to t e Spin Out prior to application. Euonymus (Euonymus kiautschovicus Loes.), forsythia (Forsyt . x intermediaZab.), and pyracantha plants growing in one gallon containers were planted in th treated pots in a bark/peat medium. There were five pots of each treatment and species and they ere maintained in a completely randomized design. On October 24, 1996 the plants were rated or circling roots on the same scale used in the other studies. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In the firs study, paint alone did not prevent circling roots or alter the growth of the pyracantha (Tabl 1). All of the chemical treatments reduced circling roots compared to the control, but the 10 est rate of Surflan allowed more circling than would be commercially acceptable. The .25% rate of Surflan provided marginally acceptable control of circling roots. All other treatme ts provided excellent control, with the 4.0% rate of Surflan being the only one that provided to control. The botto the surface than mostly covered solubilizing the s of the soil balls from all of the Surflan treated containers had no more roots on e sides. The bottoms of the soil balls from the Spin Out treated containers were th roots. It is possible that the bottom of the container stays moist longer, pper and making it susceptible to leaching. Regardle of treatment, all of the plants in treated containers were heavier than those in containers that w re unpainted or had paint only. By killing root tips, the treatments may have caused the devel ment of a more fibrous root system that absorbed nutrients and water more efficiently than a oot system with a lot of circling roots. The seco d study with the ryegrass and ajuga was initiated to determine how long the treatments would remain effective. The ryegrass was planted one year after the containers had been painted and he first crop had been grown in them. All of the chemically treated containers provided good to excellent control of circling ryegrass roots (Table 2). Grass roots are known to be especially se itive to Surflan, so after it was shown that the treatments were still active, the grass plants and oil were discarded. By Octo r 24, 1996, 18 months after the pots were treated, distinctive differences in root development of t e ajuga were becoming apparent. All treatments still reduced circling roots compared to the ontrol or paint alone (Table 2). However, the Spin Out and Surflan at 0.1% no longer provided acceptable level of control. The Surflan at 0.25 and 0.5% still provided an acceptable level f control, and at 2.0 and 4.0% allowed almost no circling roots. Plants ar rarely grown in containers for more than two years. Treatments that last two years will more t an adequately meet the needs of the nursery industry. They would also offer the industry the opti n of keeping the treated container for reuse and shipping the finished plant in a less expensive u treated container. The othe study in 1996 demonstrated the variability that exists in species response to the different treatme ts. One application of Spin Out provided good control of euonymus and forsythia roots, t was weak on pyracantha (Table 3). Two applications controlled the roots of all species. All rate of Surflan provided excellent control of pyracantha roots and good control of euonymus roots. The 2.0% rate of Surflan provided marginally acceptable control of forsythia roots, but the O. and 1.0% rates provided poor control. Surflan at 1.0% in anti-transpirant was as effective as 1. % Surflan in paint for all species. Applying 1.0% Surflan in Spin Out reduced the control of eu nymus and pyracantha roots below that provided by 1.0% Surflan in paint. 5 33 % Winter S eld. Rockland Corp., West Caldwell. NJ 07006
- Page 45 and 46: I II 45 iI Gallery* f,r Weed Preven
- Page 47 and 48: I POTENTIAL I I 47 USE OF EXP-31130
- Page 49 and 50: I" i 49 j PFMERGENCE CONTROL OF PRO
- Page 51 and 52: 51 TIIE E...·rL"",,- L OF TRINEXAP
- Page 53 and 54: 53 PERF011MANICEOF ISOXAFLUTOLE IN
- Page 55 and 56: 55 ISOXAFL OLE COMBINATIONSWITH PRE
- Page 57 and 58: 57 Weed Interference in Full Season
- Page 59 and 60: 59 HERBICIDE TRATEGIES FOR CONTROL
- Page 61 and 62: 61 Table 1.Eff ct of WeedControlTre
- Page 63 and 64: 63 DETECTION ND MOVEMENT PATTERN OF
- Page 65 and 66: 65 TRAILERING AFETY: A TRAINING COU
- Page 67 and 68: 67 EV ALUATIO OF WIT..DFLOWER ESTAB
- Page 69 and 70: 69 LlNGSNOW ECOSYSTEM PROJECT: MICR
- Page 71 and 72: 71 TABLE 1: Tree . jury provided by
- Page 74 and 75: 74 GSNOW ECOSYSTEM PROJECT: WHITE S
- Page 76 and 77: 16 cherry (Pnmus se otina ranks fou
- Page 78 and 79: .J 78 Table 1. Density, (D), relati
- Page 80 and 81: ~---------_._-~---_.._--- 80 A NEW
- Page 82 and 83: 82 WEED AFFINITY GROUPS AS A TOOL I
- Page 84 and 85: 84 NEW TE HNIQUE TO COMPARE EFFICAC
- Page 86 and 87: 86 PRO UCTION PERFORMANCE OF GLYPHO
- Page 88 and 89: 88 Managing nterseeded Cover Crops
- Page 90 and 91: -----------t----~--- 90 Since weed
- Page 92 and 93: 92 The mechanistic model (equ. I) a
- Page 94 and 95: 94 Exploring the Feasibility of Pro
- Page 98 and 99: 98 However it .ncreased the control
- Page 100 and 101: 100 LIVERWORT AND PEARLWORT MANAGEM
- Page 102 and 103: 102 ULFENTRAZONEAND HALOSULFURON:HE
- Page 104 and 105: 104 estern New York Nursery IPM Pro
- Page 106 and 107: 106 C MMONRAGWEEDCONTROLIN FIELD CO
- Page 108 and 109: 108 CGA-77102: A New Herbicide for
- Page 110 and 111: 110 POSTEMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLIN SOYB
- Page 112 and 113: 112 E FECTS OF REPEATEDLATE-WINTERH
- Page 114 and 115: 114 GSNOW ECOSYSTEl\1 PROJECT: NITR
- Page 116 and 117: 116 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION GI fosin
- Page 118 and 119: ---------T---~~-- 118 EVALUA ON OF
- Page 120 and 121: 120 B USB CONTROL PROVIDED BY LOW V
- Page 122 and 123: ------- 122 W VOLUMEWEED AND BRUSH
- Page 124 and 125: 124 EVA UATION OFGLYPHOSATEFOR DORM
- Page 126 and 127: 126 E ALUATION OF IMAZAMETH FOR WEE
- Page 128 and 129: 128 Presidential Address Delivered
- Page 130 and 131: 130 Ho much land can ten billion pe
- Page 132 and 133: Waggone December 24, 1994 132 count
- Page 134 and 135: Waggone December 24, 1994 134 25 Pa
- Page 136 and 137: Waggone December 24, 1994 136 which
- Page 138 and 139: December 24, 1994 138 sets the pecu
- Page 140 and 141: ----------+---- Waggone December 24
- Page 142 and 143: Waggone December 24, 1994 142 soil
- Page 144 and 145: Waggone December 24, 1994 144 ~oo~
96<br />
INHIBI ING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CIRCLING ROOTS IN CONTAINER GROWN<br />
ORNAMENTALS WITH ORYZALIN<br />
Larry J. Kuhns and Tracey L. Harpster!<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
of the factors that limits the length of time a plant can remain in a container, and also<br />
vival and growth following outplanting, is the development of a mat of circling roots<br />
around the all of the container. Spin Out 2 is a commercially available product that has been<br />
proven eff tive in limiting their development on many species of ornamentals. The active<br />
ingredient n Spin Out is copper hydroxide, which is carried in a latex paint base. Spin Out is<br />
painted on he walls of the containers. When root tips contact the copper they are killed. The<br />
injury is I lized, though, and simply results in a more branched root system with little or no<br />
effect on t p growth. A concern with Spin Out is the potential for accumulation of high levels of<br />
copper ov time in areas in which the containers are painted or in the soil beneath the growing<br />
areas.<br />
Orjzalin is a potent root inhibitor that in certain situations has stopped root growth without<br />
adversely fecting top growth. For example, roots growing out of the bottoms of containers set<br />
on oryzali treated soil have been stopped without causing injury to the plants. Since oryzalin is<br />
decompos by microorganisms in the soil, its use would have an environmental advantage over<br />
the use of pin Out.<br />
objectives of this study were to determine the effectiveness of oryzalin in inhibiting the<br />
t of circling roots and its effect on plant growth.<br />
MEfHODS<br />
July 28, 1995 the insides of 2.5 gallon nursery containers were painted with one of the<br />
reatments: Spin Out; latex paint' ; or Surflan 4AS4 at 0.1,0.25,0.5,2.0, or 4.0% v/v<br />
in the late paint. On July 1 pyracantha (PyracanthacoccineaM.J. Roem.) growing in one quart<br />
containers ere planted in the treated pots in a bark/peat medium. There were 12 pots of each<br />
treatment d they were maintained in a completely randomized design. Plants were fertilized and<br />
watered to maintain optimum growth. On September 12 and November 14, 1995 the plants were<br />
rated for c rcling roots on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 = no circling roots and 10 = many circling<br />
roots. PIa ts were harvested and weighed on November 15.<br />
T pots were held over the winter, and on May 2, 1996, perennial ryegrass (Latium<br />
perenne L cv. APM) was seeded into the containers. On July 12 the circling roots were rated and<br />
the grass d medium was discarded.<br />
July 28 the containers were refilled and ajuga (AjugareplansL. cv. 'Burgundy Glow')<br />
in them. Circling roots were rated on October 24, 1996.<br />
o April 26, 1996 the insides of two gallon nursery containers were painted with one of<br />
the follow ng treatments: 1 application of Spin Out (IX); 2 applications of Spin Out (2X); Surflan<br />
at 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0% v/v in latex paint; Spin Out (IX) + 1% Surflan; Spin Out (IX) + 2% Surflan;<br />
1 Prof. of mamental Horticulture and Research Associate,Dept. of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State<br />
University, Diversity Park, PA 16802<br />
2 Spin Out, Griffin Corp., Valdosta, GA 31603-1847<br />
3 Dutch B y Extra Acrylic Latex Semi-GlossEnamel (Black 19-90),Cleveland, OH 44115<br />
4 DowEl co, Indianapolis, IN 46268-1054