Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
95<br />
COMMON P<br />
SLANE AS A LIVING MULCH IN VEGETABLE CROP PRODUCTION<br />
D.R. Ellis!, R.G. Adams' and K Guillard"<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Many of th characteristics of common purslane (portulaca oleracea L.) that categorize this<br />
species as a "w " have been described as desirable traits for a living mulch. These characteristics<br />
include: 1) aggr ssive growth during late spring and summer months; 2) establishment of a dense,<br />
prostrate canop 3) vegetative reproduction by adventitious root formation on fragmented stems;<br />
and, 4) prolific production. Common purslane was investigated as a living mulch in vegetable<br />
crops and camp red with conventional methods of weed management, which included mechanical<br />
and chemicalme ods as well as the use ofblack plasticin broccoli. Field trials were conducted from<br />
1993 to 1994 i Storrs, Connecticut on spring broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. 'Packman') and sna~<br />
beans h vul&arisL. 'Gator Green'). Common purslane seed was broadcast over the soil 1o<br />
to 14 days prior to transplanting broccoli or sowing snap beans. Fresh weight yields, harvest date,<br />
leaf developme and soiltemperatures were determinedfor each crop. Plots in each treatment were<br />
rated for weed ntrol and percent ground cover by common purslane. Noncrop biomass, which was<br />
comprised of c mmon purslane and weed biomass, was measured under each method of weed<br />
management. ritical levels of weed control and noncrop biomass for optimum crop yields were<br />
estimated using linear-plateau model.<br />
Springbroc li and snap bean yieldsfrom plantsgrown in purslane living mulch were comparable<br />
to yieldsfrom pI ts grown under conventional methods of weed management. No differences were<br />
found in harvest ate or leaf development for either crop across all methods of weed management in<br />
comparison wi h control treatments where weeds were not managed. Late afternoon soil<br />
temperatures ere significantly lower under purslane living mulch in comparison with soil<br />
temperatures w .ch occurred when either crop was grown under mechanical weed management Of<br />
when spring bro coli was grown under black plastic. Common purslane as a living mulch was able<br />
to effectivelyco pete with weeds in spring broccoli and snap beans when between-row areas were<br />
kept relatively eed-free during the first two weeks after transplanting or sowing. High levels of<br />
weed control a d ground cover occurred through the establishment of common purslane between<br />
crop rows. Sp ng broccoli and snap bean plants were tolerant of purslane living mulch and weeds<br />
up to critical th eshold levels, without any significant reductions in yield.<br />
A periodic Itivation of common purslane and/or weeds between crop rows during the critical<br />
weed-free peri d in the first two weeks after spring broccoli transplanting or snap bean seedling<br />
emergence pro .ded a minimal level of weed management which produced acceptable crop yields.<br />
Noncrop biom s measured under purslane living mulch was below critical threshold levels and<br />
therefore did no reduce yield. While the inclusion of a purslane living mulch into a spring broccoli<br />
or snap bean cr p production system may be a novel approach to controlling weeds, the strategies<br />
involved in this system rely on basic weed management principles, as presented in the study.<br />
'Program Spec' list, Dept. of Plant <strong>Science</strong>, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269<br />
2Assist.Dir., C operative Extension System, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269<br />
3Assoc. Prof, ept. of Plant <strong>Science</strong>, Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269