08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88<br />

Managing<br />

nterseeded Cover Crops in Potatoes by Varying Seeding Rate and Placement<br />

R. Rajalahti* and R R. Bellinder, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.<br />

Inters ded cover crops have shown potential to suppress weeds in several crops. Field<br />

studies we e conducted in 1995 and 1996 to evaluate potential weed suppression with two cover<br />

crop place ent techniques (broadcast and strip-plant) and two seeding rates of hairy vetch (23<br />

and 46 kg a), oats (36 and 72 kg/ha), and red clover (7 and 14 kg/ha) to suppress in-season<br />

weeds in otatoes. All cover crops were interseeded following hilling 5 weeks after planting<br />

(WAP). over crops and weeds were regulated with fluazifop (0.22 kg ai/ha) and metribuzin<br />

(0.28 kg a) as-needed. Treatments were compared to bareground and to a chemical standard,<br />

metolachl r (1.7 kg ailha) and linuron (1.7 kg ai/ha), applied PRE. In both years, the chemical<br />

standard ovided best weed control, however, differences were not significant. In neither year<br />

did cover rop seed placement technique or seeding rate affect weed controL In a dry season<br />

(1995), re ulated grasses provided better weed suppression than unregulated legumes. In 1996, a<br />

season wi adequate precipitation, when cover crops were not regulated, legumes tended to<br />

provide tter weed suppression than grasses. Yield differences were not significant in either<br />

year. Ho ever, in general, yields with broadcasting tended to be greater than with strip-planting,<br />

and yiel with lower seeding rates greater than with higher rates. In 1995, yield with grasses<br />

were bett r than with legumes, but in 1996, differences between cover crops were not significant.<br />

Thus, nei er cover crop placement or seeding rate affected weed suppression. Yield, however,<br />

was redu by higher cover crop seeding rates.<br />

Key wor s: potato, interseeding, cover crops, competition, seed placement, seeding rate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!