Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
72<br />
BVAL<br />
ATION OF BURN-DOWN MATERIAl.S FOR TOTAL VEGETATION CONTROL<br />
UNDER GUIDE RAILS<br />
Jon M. Johnson, Chad W. Spackman and Larry J. Kuhnsl/<br />
ABSTRAcr<br />
A stud evaluating glufosinate-ammonium (glufosinate) and pelargonic acid (Scythe2') for<br />
total vege lion control along roadsides was initiated as part of a cooperative project between The<br />
Pennsylv ia State University and The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. Roadside<br />
treatments were applied to 3 by 25 ft plots located along a guiderail near State College, PA, on July<br />
20, 1996; sing a CO2-powered hand held sprayer. To compare any potential differences in spray<br />
volumes, GPA and 80 GPA were both applied using either two Spraying Systems OC-04 spray<br />
tips at 23 si or two OC-08 spray tips at 36 psi, respectively. Visual ground cover ratings of<br />
annual an perennial weed species were taken July 18, to assess the original weed pressure and<br />
July 29, 9 ys after treatment (DAT); August 30, 41 DAT; and October 4, 1996, 76 DAT.<br />
Predomin t weed species were common lambsquarters (ChenopodiumalbumL.), common<br />
ragweed ( rosiaartemisiifoliaL.), wild carrot (DaucuscarotaL.), wild parsnip tPastinaca<br />
sativaL.), spotted knapweed (CentaureamaculosaLam.), chicory (CichoriumintybusL.), white<br />
sweetelov r (Melilotusalba Medik.), giant foxtail (SetariafaberiHerrm.), and green foxtail<br />
(SetariaVI idis L.).<br />
The in tial green cover ratings were, on average, between 78 and 94 percent for all plots.<br />
Glufosina was the only postemergent product that provided significant early signs of necrosis to<br />
the trea plants 9 DAT. By 41 DAT, treatments containing sulfometuron methyl and diuron<br />
combined ith a postemergent product and imazapyr plus diuron provided significantly better<br />
control th all other treatments, with green cover 15 percent or less. Glufosinate alone;<br />
glufosina plus 2,4-D; glufosinate plus imazapyr; Scythe plus glyphosate; and sulfometuron<br />
methyl pI diuron all provided poor control.<br />
All tre tments began to show an increase in weed pressure 76 DAT. The glufosinate,<br />
glufosina plus 2,4-D, and glyphosate all continued to show excellent long-term control when<br />
used in co bination with sulfometuron methyl and diuron. The imazapyr and diuron mix also<br />
maintain excellent control at this rating period<br />
Glufo . ate, when tank mixed with sulfometuron methyl and diuron, provided statistically<br />
similarres Its at both the 0.5 and 1lbla rates. Glyphosate at 21b/a performed well at both 41 DAT<br />
and 76 D T when tank mixed with sulfometuron methyl and diuron, Reducing the rate of<br />
glyphosa to Ilbla and adding Scythe did not significantly reduce control. Treatments 10 and 12<br />
compared Scythe, glyphosate, sulfometuron methyl, and diuron at 40 versus 80 GPA. There was<br />
no statisti al difference noted at any rating period between these two treatments.<br />
rapid bumdown and long-term control control are desired, glufosinate at both 0.5 and 1<br />
ufosinate plus 2,4-D , when combined with sulfometuron methyl and diuron can be<br />
11Project istant, ResearchTechnologist,andProfessorof OrnamentalHorticulture,respectively,The<br />
Pennsy ania State University,UniversityPark,PA. 16802<br />
2/Scythe,5 % pelargonicacid, MycogenCorp.