08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72<br />

BVAL<br />

ATION OF BURN-DOWN MATERIAl.S FOR TOTAL VEGETATION CONTROL<br />

UNDER GUIDE RAILS<br />

Jon M. Johnson, Chad W. Spackman and Larry J. Kuhnsl/<br />

ABSTRAcr<br />

A stud evaluating glufosinate-ammonium (glufosinate) and pelargonic acid (Scythe2') for<br />

total vege lion control along roadsides was initiated as part of a cooperative project between The<br />

Pennsylv ia State University and The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. Roadside<br />

treatments were applied to 3 by 25 ft plots located along a guiderail near State College, PA, on July<br />

20, 1996; sing a CO2-powered hand held sprayer. To compare any potential differences in spray<br />

volumes, GPA and 80 GPA were both applied using either two Spraying Systems OC-04 spray<br />

tips at 23 si or two OC-08 spray tips at 36 psi, respectively. Visual ground cover ratings of<br />

annual an perennial weed species were taken July 18, to assess the original weed pressure and<br />

July 29, 9 ys after treatment (DAT); August 30, 41 DAT; and October 4, 1996, 76 DAT.<br />

Predomin t weed species were common lambsquarters (ChenopodiumalbumL.), common<br />

ragweed ( rosiaartemisiifoliaL.), wild carrot (DaucuscarotaL.), wild parsnip tPastinaca<br />

sativaL.), spotted knapweed (CentaureamaculosaLam.), chicory (CichoriumintybusL.), white<br />

sweetelov r (Melilotusalba Medik.), giant foxtail (SetariafaberiHerrm.), and green foxtail<br />

(SetariaVI idis L.).<br />

The in tial green cover ratings were, on average, between 78 and 94 percent for all plots.<br />

Glufosina was the only postemergent product that provided significant early signs of necrosis to<br />

the trea plants 9 DAT. By 41 DAT, treatments containing sulfometuron methyl and diuron<br />

combined ith a postemergent product and imazapyr plus diuron provided significantly better<br />

control th all other treatments, with green cover 15 percent or less. Glufosinate alone;<br />

glufosina plus 2,4-D; glufosinate plus imazapyr; Scythe plus glyphosate; and sulfometuron<br />

methyl pI diuron all provided poor control.<br />

All tre tments began to show an increase in weed pressure 76 DAT. The glufosinate,<br />

glufosina plus 2,4-D, and glyphosate all continued to show excellent long-term control when<br />

used in co bination with sulfometuron methyl and diuron. The imazapyr and diuron mix also<br />

maintain excellent control at this rating period<br />

Glufo . ate, when tank mixed with sulfometuron methyl and diuron, provided statistically<br />

similarres Its at both the 0.5 and 1lbla rates. Glyphosate at 21b/a performed well at both 41 DAT<br />

and 76 D T when tank mixed with sulfometuron methyl and diuron, Reducing the rate of<br />

glyphosa to Ilbla and adding Scythe did not significantly reduce control. Treatments 10 and 12<br />

compared Scythe, glyphosate, sulfometuron methyl, and diuron at 40 versus 80 GPA. There was<br />

no statisti al difference noted at any rating period between these two treatments.<br />

rapid bumdown and long-term control control are desired, glufosinate at both 0.5 and 1<br />

ufosinate plus 2,4-D , when combined with sulfometuron methyl and diuron can be<br />

11Project istant, ResearchTechnologist,andProfessorof OrnamentalHorticulture,respectively,The<br />

Pennsy ania State University,UniversityPark,PA. 16802<br />

2/Scythe,5 % pelargonicacid, MycogenCorp.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!