08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7<br />

TaL~NCEaFHNE~CU~TaCL~HarnM<br />

Larry J. Kuhns And Tracey L. Harpster'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In past studies it was found that fine fescues were immune to the effects of two of the most<br />

commonly used graminicides, fluazifop-p-butyl and sethoxydim. This study was initiated to<br />

determine the tolerance of three fine fescues; chewings (Festucarubra spp. commutata Gaud.­<br />

Beaup.), hard (FestucalongifoliaThuill.), and creeping red (Festucarubra L.); to clethodim alone<br />

or with a crop oil concentrate (CDC) or a non-ionic surfactant (NIS)2. The treatments presented in<br />

Table 1 were applied on October 23, 1995. The percent green cover was rated on May 22 and<br />

July 9, 1996. Thq treatments presented in Table 2 were applied on May 31, 1996 and were<br />

evaluated on July 9, 1996. All treatments were applied with a CC>:2pressurized test plot sprayer at<br />

30 psi through an ~E nozzle at 22 GPA. A randomized complete block design with three<br />

replications per treatment and species was used.<br />

Applied inlthe fall at O.25lb/a alone or with NIS, clethodim had little effect on chewings or<br />

creeping red fescue (Table 1). With hard fescue, some injury was evident on May 22, but it<br />

recovered by July p. The addition of cac resulted in moderate injury to all three species, with<br />

only partial recovery by July 9. Severe injury of all species from clethodim applied at l lb/a was<br />

evident on May 24' The amount of recovery that occurred by July 9 was dependent on the spray<br />

additive used. With none, all of the grasses recovered fairly well. With NIS, moderate injury to<br />

hard fescue persisted:and with COC, unacceptable injury to all species persisted.<br />

Similar results were obtained when the treatments were applied in the spring (Table 2).<br />

The 0.251b/a rate caused slight injury, regardless of additive. The 1.0 Ib/a rate caused severe<br />

injury, with treatments including cae injuring hard fescue slightly worse than those including<br />

NIS. The 0.5lb/a'rate caused an intermediate degree of injury.<br />

None of the clethodim treatments totally killed any of the fine fescues. However,<br />

unacceptable injury was caused by the 0.5 and 1.0 lbla rates, regardless of additive, and by the<br />

0.251bla + cac treatment. Injured turf was invaded by broadleaved weeds and was lower quality<br />

even after recovering from initial injury.<br />

1 Prof. of Ornamental Horticulture and Research Associate, Dept. of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State<br />

University, University Park, PA 16802<br />

2 X-77 Spreader, Loveland Ind., Inc.•Greeley, CO 80632-1289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!