Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
63<br />
DETECTION ND MOVEMENT PATTERN OF IMAZETHAPYR IN SELECTED<br />
SOILS OF NEW JERSEY<br />
S.W. Jourdan, B.A. Majek and A.O. Ayeni'"<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Imaze apyr is among the most widely used herbicides for PRE and POST weed<br />
control in legum s in world agriculture. Reports from North America have shown that the<br />
herbicide has c over problems which in some instances have injured susceptible follow<br />
crops in conven onal crop rotations. Studies have also shown that several factors influence<br />
the soil persiste e behavior of imazethapyr. It is important to understand clearly under what<br />
conditions are th carryover problems most likely to occur so the farmer can take this into<br />
account in his c p rotation plans.<br />
Betw n 1991 and 1995, laboratory and greenhouse studies at the Rutgers<br />
Agricultural Re ch and Extension Center, showed that the degree of sugar beets root<br />
length suppressi n caused by imazethapyr applied at 2.5 ppb to Berryland sand (97% sand,<br />
1.5% organic m tter [OM)), increased as soil pH increased from 3.75 to 7.48. Among four<br />
soils (pH adjust to 6.5) compared, the lowest concentrations of imazethapyr detectable with<br />
sugar beets root ength were 0.5 ppb in acid washed sand (90% sand, 0.04% OM); 1.0 ppb<br />
in Berryland san and Aura loamy sand (82% sand, 0.93% OM); and 5 to 10 ppb in Muck<br />
soil (72% sand, 6.48% OM). In Berryland sand (pH 6.5), with normal watering and using<br />
sugar beets root ength as imazethapyr indicator, the residue of imazethapyr applied to soil<br />
columns at 0.07 kg ai/ha, remained in the 0 to 15 em soil layer for three months after<br />
application. T e herbicide moved further down to 30-cm depth by the fifth month after<br />
application, but esidue level dropped significantly in the 0 to 5 em soil layer. Under low<br />
pH (5.5) and ro m temperature (26.7 "C), low level of imazethapyr residue was detected at 5<br />
to 10 cm soilla er only when the soil moisture level was moderately high (approx. 70% field<br />
capacity [FC]). Under neutral pH (7.0) and low temperature (10 °C), the dissipation of<br />
imazethapyr wa slow with high residue level detected in the 0 to 10 and 0 to 15 cm soil<br />
layers under 10 (approx. 50% FC) and moderately high soil moisture respectively, three<br />
months after he icide application (MAHA). Under neutral pH and room temperature,<br />
imazethapyr dis ipated rapidly, with low residue level detected in the 0 to 30 em soil layer<br />
under low soil oisture, and very low level detected in the 5 to 30 cm soil layer under<br />
moderaletly hi soil moisture. Imazethapyr residue was not detected beyond 3Q-cm soil<br />
depth in any of e treatments 3 MAHA.<br />
These dies showed that the bioavailability of imazethapyr is significantly enhanced<br />
under high soil H (2. 6.5) and as low as 0.5 to 1.0 ppb is detectable in sand and loamy<br />
sand soils using sugar beets root length as imazethapyr indicator. It was also demonstrated<br />
that residue fro imazethapyr applied at 0.07 kg ai/ha, does not move beyond 30 em in the<br />
soil profile up t five months after application; and carryover problem may be most serious<br />
in low pH soil limed under low temperature and low moisture conditions.<br />
'Former P stdoctoral Research Associate, Prof., Visiting Scientist, Rutgers Agricultural<br />
Research and E tension Center, Rutgers University, Bridgeton, NJ 08302.