08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

63<br />

DETECTION ND MOVEMENT PATTERN OF IMAZETHAPYR IN SELECTED<br />

SOILS OF NEW JERSEY<br />

S.W. Jourdan, B.A. Majek and A.O. Ayeni'"<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Imaze apyr is among the most widely used herbicides for PRE and POST weed<br />

control in legum s in world agriculture. Reports from North America have shown that the<br />

herbicide has c over problems which in some instances have injured susceptible follow<br />

crops in conven onal crop rotations. Studies have also shown that several factors influence<br />

the soil persiste e behavior of imazethapyr. It is important to understand clearly under what<br />

conditions are th carryover problems most likely to occur so the farmer can take this into<br />

account in his c p rotation plans.<br />

Betw n 1991 and 1995, laboratory and greenhouse studies at the Rutgers<br />

Agricultural Re ch and Extension Center, showed that the degree of sugar beets root<br />

length suppressi n caused by imazethapyr applied at 2.5 ppb to Berryland sand (97% sand,<br />

1.5% organic m tter [OM)), increased as soil pH increased from 3.75 to 7.48. Among four<br />

soils (pH adjust to 6.5) compared, the lowest concentrations of imazethapyr detectable with<br />

sugar beets root ength were 0.5 ppb in acid washed sand (90% sand, 0.04% OM); 1.0 ppb<br />

in Berryland san and Aura loamy sand (82% sand, 0.93% OM); and 5 to 10 ppb in Muck<br />

soil (72% sand, 6.48% OM). In Berryland sand (pH 6.5), with normal watering and using<br />

sugar beets root ength as imazethapyr indicator, the residue of imazethapyr applied to soil<br />

columns at 0.07 kg ai/ha, remained in the 0 to 15 em soil layer for three months after<br />

application. T e herbicide moved further down to 30-cm depth by the fifth month after<br />

application, but esidue level dropped significantly in the 0 to 5 em soil layer. Under low<br />

pH (5.5) and ro m temperature (26.7 "C), low level of imazethapyr residue was detected at 5<br />

to 10 cm soilla er only when the soil moisture level was moderately high (approx. 70% field<br />

capacity [FC]). Under neutral pH (7.0) and low temperature (10 °C), the dissipation of<br />

imazethapyr wa slow with high residue level detected in the 0 to 10 and 0 to 15 cm soil<br />

layers under 10 (approx. 50% FC) and moderately high soil moisture respectively, three<br />

months after he icide application (MAHA). Under neutral pH and room temperature,<br />

imazethapyr dis ipated rapidly, with low residue level detected in the 0 to 30 em soil layer<br />

under low soil oisture, and very low level detected in the 5 to 30 cm soil layer under<br />

moderaletly hi soil moisture. Imazethapyr residue was not detected beyond 3Q-cm soil<br />

depth in any of e treatments 3 MAHA.<br />

These dies showed that the bioavailability of imazethapyr is significantly enhanced<br />

under high soil H (2. 6.5) and as low as 0.5 to 1.0 ppb is detectable in sand and loamy<br />

sand soils using sugar beets root length as imazethapyr indicator. It was also demonstrated<br />

that residue fro imazethapyr applied at 0.07 kg ai/ha, does not move beyond 30 em in the<br />

soil profile up t five months after application; and carryover problem may be most serious<br />

in low pH soil limed under low temperature and low moisture conditions.<br />

'Former P stdoctoral Research Associate, Prof., Visiting Scientist, Rutgers Agricultural<br />

Research and E tension Center, Rutgers University, Bridgeton, NJ 08302.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!