08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62<br />

PHYTOTOXICITY AND EFFICACY OF BALANCE FOR<br />

WEED CONTROL IN FIELD CORN<br />

Bradley A. Majek'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

ance was evaluated in no-till and conventionally planted field com at Rutgers<br />

Agricultu Research and Extension Center in 1996. The Balance rate considered as the use<br />

rate in th no-till com was 0.094Ib aila, while the rate used in the conventionally planted com<br />

was 0.07 lb ai/a. Large crabgrass Dil:itaria sanl:uinalis (L.) Scop., common lambsquarter<br />

h . m L., and smooth pigweed Amaranthus hybridus L. were present in the no-till<br />

study. e weeds in the conventionally planted study were giant foxtail Setaria~ Herrm.,<br />

common bsquarter, smooth pigweed, and wild buckwheat PoIYl:0numconvolvulus L. <strong>Weed</strong><br />

control' the No-till com was marginally unacceptable, where large crabgrass and smooth<br />

pigweed ntrol dropped below eighty percent. Control of weeds in the conventionally planted<br />

com was ood with the exception of wild buckwheat which was not controlled by Balance. No<br />

com inj was observed in the no-till study due to Balance applications, but slight,<br />

nonsigni cant injury was observed in the conventionally planted study. Tank-mixing Balance<br />

with a .ne improved weed control, including wild buckwheat, without increasing crop injury.<br />

Tank-mi with Dual or Topnotch increased crop injury and did not control wild buckwheat.<br />

IE tension Specialist in <strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, Rutgers-The State<br />

univer ity, Bridgeton, NJ 08302-9452

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!