Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
40<br />
ECOL<br />
ICAL ASPECfS OF CRABGRASS INFESTATION IN COOL-SEASON TURF<br />
T. J. Kim' ,J. C. Neal 2 and F. S. Rossi'<br />
ABSTRACf<br />
s (Digitariaspp.) continue to be troublesome in turf management systems, but current<br />
infonnatio on the ecological aspects of those infestations is limited. The development of more<br />
efficient c ntrol strategies will require an improved understanding of seedling establishment,<br />
growth an survival. The objectives of this study were to investigate how much open space (gap<br />
size) is re uired for crabgrass seedling survival, how growth rate differs between gap sizes in<br />
Cool-seas n turf and to identify potential causes for differences in crabgrass survival and growth<br />
based on e vironmental monitoring.<br />
Field periments were conducted in 1996 on a mature stand of turf-type tall fescue (Festuca<br />
arundinace) with a history of heavy (site A) and no smooth crabgrass infestation (site B). Five<br />
gap sizes f 2.5 to 20.0 em diameter were created by spot treatment with 2.0 % (v/v) Finale<br />
(glufosina ) and arranged in a randomized complete block design. After the turf died, half of the<br />
gaps were disturbed (dead grass and thatch removed and replaced with soil); the remaining gaps<br />
were undi turbed. All plots were mowed bi-weekly at 2.5" height; clippings were removed, and<br />
gap sizes ere maintained by clipping the encroaching grass blades once a week. Three grass weed<br />
species, sooth crabgrass (D. ischaemum), large crabgrass (D. sanguinalis) and goosegrass<br />
(Eleusine . a) were overseeded on 22 May in the gaps. Seedling emergence rate and tiller<br />
developm nt were counted weekly from May to August. Throughout the month of August, weekly<br />
seedhead ounts were recorded. Soil temperatures at 2.5 and 5 em depth were continuously<br />
monitored from 24 May to 19 July at 30 minute intervals with in-ground thermocouples and a<br />
Cambell RlOX data logger.<br />
Mean aily temperatures were not substantially different for 2.5 and 5 em soil depth. However,<br />
daily tern rature fluctuations were significantly different among the gap sizes, with higher and<br />
lower te peratures recorded in the largest gap. Significantly more smooth crabgrass plants<br />
emerged i gaps compared to no gap; but there were no differences in number of crabgrass plants<br />
emerged ong the gap sizes. Therefore, gaps of any size could lead to smooth crabgrass<br />
infestatio s. Following seedling emergence, tiller development was more rapid in larger than<br />
smaller g ps. This suggests that the timing of postemergence herbicide treatments will be more<br />
critical in pen turf (with larger gaps) than in a denser turf (smaller gaps) as plants will more<br />
rapidly ac .eve the size that is more difficult to control in more open turf areas.<br />
In ex riment B, goosegrass did not emerge when no gaps were created. While small numbers<br />
of crabgr s seedlings were evident in no-gap areas, however, these seedlings did not survive.<br />
Seedling mergence of threespecies were significantly influenced by thatch, however, there was<br />
no thatch y gap size interaction. The emergence and survival of smooth crabgrass were similar to<br />
what was observed in experiment A in gaps, while that of goosegrass was significantly lower,<br />
especially in gaps with thatch. Seedhead production was not effected by gap sizes and was greater<br />
for crab ss than goose grass.<br />
In summary, the minimum gap size for crabgrass emergence and survival was between 0<br />
and 2.5 c . In contrast, a gap size of 2.5 em was required for goosegrass emergence and 5.0 em<br />
for surviv to seed production. These data confirm the paradigm that dense turf will exclude seedpropaga<br />
weeds. However, it also illustrates that weed species differ in the minimum turf density<br />
required t prevent weed infestations. This research suggest that both the prevention of weed seed<br />
germinati n and inhibition of weed seedling growth and development are active components of this<br />
competiti e relationship.<br />
I Grad.<br />
14853<br />
s. Asst. and Asst. Professor, Dept. Om. & Hort., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY<br />
2 Asst. fessor, Dept. Hort. Sci., NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609