Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I<br />
I<br />
i<br />
33<br />
I<br />
EFFECT$ OF EXP 31130A AND FOE S043ON WEED CONTROL AND<br />
I<br />
CORN YIELD<br />
I S. Kushwaha and P. C. Bhowmik 1<br />
I<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
I<br />
Three fiei-' experiments were conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm, South<br />
Deerfield to stud the effects of EXP 31130A and FOE 5043 on weed control and com (Z&a<br />
manL.) in 199 .. EXP 31130A at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 oz ailA and FOE 5034<br />
0.25, 0.5, 0.75, ~.O, 1.25 and 1.5 Ib/A were examined separately in randomized complete<br />
block design. TIle split plot design hadtwo growth stages of herbicide application (pRE and<br />
POST at the 1- ~ 2-leaf stage of com) as mainplots, and treatment combinations of EXP<br />
31130A at 1.0, Il 5 and 2.0 ozlA and FOE 5043 at 8, 12 and 16 ozlA and a premix<br />
combination of a . e + metolachlor at 2.5 Ib/A as sub-plots. Treatments were replicated<br />
three times in all experiments. <strong>Weed</strong> counts were taken 3, 6 and 9 weeks after treatment<br />
(WAT) and w dry weights were determined 3, 6,9, and 12 WAT. <strong>Weed</strong> control was<br />
estimated on a e of 0 to 100, where O=no control and 100=100% control, at 8, 9, 12,<br />
and 15 WAT. S age and grain yields of com were determined.<br />
EXPa::;~.at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and3.0 ozIA controlled largecrabgrass<br />
[Di&itaria i' (L.) Scop.] and common lambsquarter (ChenQPOdiumlUminL.) over<br />
95%. ThiS~ was i flected by the reduction of weed number and weed dry weights. The 3.0<br />
ozlA rate of 31130A controlled yellow foxtail [Setaria lutescens (Weigel) Hubb.] only<br />
over 70% 8 WA with reduced control later in the season. None of the EXP 31130A<br />
treatments resuI~ in silage or grain yields comparable to that of the cultivated check (23.3<br />
ton/A and 143.3/oulA).<br />
In secondiexperiment,FOE 5034 at 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25 and 1.5 Ib/A gave over 95%<br />
control of yello~ foxtail and large crabgrass. FOE 5043 at 0.75 to 1.5 Ib/A controlled<br />
common lambsquarterover 85% throughout the entire season. All FOE 5043 treatments<br />
except the 0.25 leI A resulted in com silage and grain yields comparable to that of the<br />
cultivated check 126.7 ton/A and 167 bu/A).<br />
In third experiment, all treatment combinations of EXP 31130A and FOE 5043,<br />
regardless of theE'timing of application, resulted in over 95 % control of large crabgrass and<br />
common lambsq r. All treatment combinations whether applied PRE or at the 1- to 2<br />
leaf stage contro l ed yellow foxtail over 80%. However, yellow foxtail control was reduced<br />
later in the season.Atrazine + metolachlor combination treatment gave better yellow foxtail<br />
control when applied at the 1- to 2-leaf stage compared to the PRE application. Regardless<br />
of the timing of ~pplication, all treatment combinations resulted in com silage and grain<br />
yields comparabi to that of the cultivated check (27.6 ton/A and 182.1 bu/A).<br />
IGraduate ResecufchAssistant and Professor, Department of Plant and Soil <strong>Science</strong>s,<br />
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003<br />
I<br />
I<br />
i<br />
I<br />
I<br />
!<br />
I<br />
i<br />
I<br />
!