08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

193<br />

In 1987 $682Imillion was spent on pesticide research and development. $173 million was spent<br />

on EPA registratioa-related R&D. In 1993 $303 million was spent on EPA related R&D alone. The<br />

total figure was nqt available (Table 8).<br />

I<br />

In 1993 therelwere over 1.3 million certified pesticide applicators in the u.s.. Pesticides were<br />

applied on over 1 million farms and around 69 million households (Table 9).<br />

I<br />

To properly ~ork with and apply herbicides, researchers and applicators should have a<br />

knowledge base that includes information on weed taxonomy, anatomy, and biology; herbicide<br />

chemistry and mies of action; spray adjuvants and carriers; soil characteristics and environmental<br />

factors that affect erbicide performance; application equipment technology; the development of<br />

herbicide resistanq ; alleleopathy; and the biological control of weeds.<br />

As of 1981 n~ university in the world had a full weed science department (2). A three year<br />

study by an expert panel from the European <strong>Weed</strong> Research <strong>Society</strong> reported for Europe, "Itappears<br />

that the number orhours spent teaching weed science or weed control to academic agriculturists, or<br />

even specialists itj crop protection, is often little more than that considered necessary to train a<br />

technician to apply herbicides correctly and is far less than that devoted to entomology or plant<br />

pathology". There are more full-time official entomologists and plant pathologists in North America<br />

than there are weedspecialists in the entire world (and a greater disparity exists if the academic<br />

qualifications are)considered).<br />

I<br />

The survey Xias conducted to determine the current status of weed science programs relative to<br />

entomology and lant pathology programs. According to the information received, compared to<br />

weed science, th re were 15% and 34% more graduate degrees earned by students in entomology<br />

and plant pathology in 1993 and 1994 (Figure 1). About five times as many U.S. students received<br />

degrees in weed science as foreign students. Twice as many U.S. students received degrees in<br />

entomology as foreign students. In plant pathology, almost as many foreign students as U.S.<br />

students receiv~ graduate degrees.<br />

As of Fall scPmester, 1995, entomology had the most (20) U.S. graduate students enrolled. The<br />

number of U.S. graduate students in weed science and plant pathology programs was about equal<br />

(11 and 12). Tbere were very few foreign students in graduate programs in weed science (3).<br />

Entomology andlplant pathology had equal numbers of foreign students in Masters degree programs<br />

(3), but plant pathology had more students in PhD programs than entomology (10 and 7). The<br />

relatively high niunbers of graduate students in PhD programs in plant pathology can be linked to the<br />

data presented itl Table 10. While the U.S. accounts for 41 % of the herbicides and 32% of the<br />

insecticides used in the world, it only uses 14% of the fungicides. Diseases are apparently more<br />

serious problems in other parts of the world.<br />

I<br />

There are f~w faculty teaching courses in weed science (3). There are four and five times as<br />

many faculty teaching plant pathology and entomology courses. There are few undergraduate or<br />

graduate courses taught in weed science (5 total). There are three to four times as many courses<br />

taught in plant Prathology (18) and six to seven times as many courses taught in entomology (32).<br />

,<br />

It is astounding that with a fraction of the teaching faculty and courses offered that there were<br />

almost as many ~tudents graduated from weed science programs as either entomology or plant<br />

pathology programs, However, the number of students currently enrolled in these programs indicate<br />

that this relationship will change and that in the future more students will graduate from entomology<br />

and plant pathology than from weed science programs.<br />

r<br />

On the ave~age, the leading universities in the country have only three faculty teaching courses<br />

in weed. Scienc~· and they teach only t~o undergraduate and three graduate courses each year. By<br />

companson, th e are 15 faculty teaching 13 undergraduate and 19 graduate courses in the leading<br />

entomology pr grams in the country.<br />

I<br />

I<br />

i<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!