Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

08.06.2015 Views

192 AGRICULTURE NEEDS MORE WEED SCIENTISTS Larry J. Kuhns and Tracey L. Harpster! INTRODUCTION Weeds ust be controlled to produce marketable crop yields, for human safety, and for aesthetic reasons. Ph sical methods of weed control are highly labor and/or energy intensive, and in many cases are m re dangerous to crops and people than herbicides. They are not practical solutions to most weed roblems in developed countries. Non-chemical control methods used to control insects and disease, such as selecting and breeding crops for resistance, or developing biological controls, have limi applications in weed control. MEfHODS AND MATERIALS In 199 , current and historical data on pesticide production and use were collected from governmen and industry sources. It was organized and summarized to show the significance of herbicides t late twentieth century agriculture. At the ame time a survey of 15 of the leading universities in the country in entomology (Alabama, rizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Michigan, Nebraska, North Carolina, Oregon, Pe nsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington); plant pathology (Arizona, alifornia, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, New York, New Jersey, North Car ina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin); and weed science (Alabama, rkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippj, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin) was conducted. The num r of Masters and PhD degrees conferred to U.S. citizens and foreign students, graduate students cu ently enrolled, courses offered, and teaching facuIty were determined. All data represent a erages of the 15 programs surveyed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Chem cals are needed to efficiently and effectively control weeds. Only 4.2% of farm expenditur s were used for all pesticides in 1993 (Table 1). Based on the data in Table 2 (56% of pesticides sed are herbicides), only about 23% of farm expenditures were used on herbicides. Herbi ide use steadily increased until 1984 (Table 3). The decrease in use since 1984 is probably d e to the introduction of new products that are applied at extremely low rates of ai/ha compared 0 older materials. Herbi ide use, in terms of product used or expenditures, is greater by a wide margin than that of insecticid and fungicides combined (Tables 2,3,4). The .S. produced about 1.3 billion pounds of pesticide with a sales value of $8.25 billion in 1993 (Tab e 5). About two thirds of all pesticides produced in, and exported from, the U.S. are herbicides (Table 6). Abou 40% of all of the herbicides used in the world are used in the U.S. (Table 7). Only 32% of the ins ticides and 14% of the fungicides are used in the U.S. 1Prof. of 0 ental Horticulture and Research Associate.Dept. of Horticulture. The Pennsylvania State University. niversity Park, PA 16802

I I I 193 In 1987 $682Imillion was spent on pesticide research and development. $173 million was spent on EPA registratioa-related R&D. In 1993 $303 million was spent on EPA related R&D alone. The total figure was nqt available (Table 8). I In 1993 therelwere over 1.3 million certified pesticide applicators in the u.s.. Pesticides were applied on over 1 million farms and around 69 million households (Table 9). I To properly ~ork with and apply herbicides, researchers and applicators should have a knowledge base that includes information on weed taxonomy, anatomy, and biology; herbicide chemistry and mies of action; spray adjuvants and carriers; soil characteristics and environmental factors that affect erbicide performance; application equipment technology; the development of herbicide resistanq ; alleleopathy; and the biological control of weeds. As of 1981 n~ university in the world had a full weed science department (2). A three year study by an expert panel from the European Weed Research Society reported for Europe, "Itappears that the number orhours spent teaching weed science or weed control to academic agriculturists, or even specialists itj crop protection, is often little more than that considered necessary to train a technician to apply herbicides correctly and is far less than that devoted to entomology or plant pathology". There are more full-time official entomologists and plant pathologists in North America than there are weedspecialists in the entire world (and a greater disparity exists if the academic qualifications are)considered). I The survey Xias conducted to determine the current status of weed science programs relative to entomology and lant pathology programs. According to the information received, compared to weed science, th re were 15% and 34% more graduate degrees earned by students in entomology and plant pathology in 1993 and 1994 (Figure 1). About five times as many U.S. students received degrees in weed science as foreign students. Twice as many U.S. students received degrees in entomology as foreign students. In plant pathology, almost as many foreign students as U.S. students receiv~ graduate degrees. As of Fall scPmester, 1995, entomology had the most (20) U.S. graduate students enrolled. The number of U.S. graduate students in weed science and plant pathology programs was about equal (11 and 12). Tbere were very few foreign students in graduate programs in weed science (3). Entomology andlplant pathology had equal numbers of foreign students in Masters degree programs (3), but plant pathology had more students in PhD programs than entomology (10 and 7). The relatively high niunbers of graduate students in PhD programs in plant pathology can be linked to the data presented itl Table 10. While the U.S. accounts for 41 % of the herbicides and 32% of the insecticides used in the world, it only uses 14% of the fungicides. Diseases are apparently more serious problems in other parts of the world. I There are f~w faculty teaching courses in weed science (3). There are four and five times as many faculty teaching plant pathology and entomology courses. There are few undergraduate or graduate courses taught in weed science (5 total). There are three to four times as many courses taught in plant Prathology (18) and six to seven times as many courses taught in entomology (32). , It is astounding that with a fraction of the teaching faculty and courses offered that there were almost as many ~tudents graduated from weed science programs as either entomology or plant pathology programs, However, the number of students currently enrolled in these programs indicate that this relationship will change and that in the future more students will graduate from entomology and plant pathology than from weed science programs. r On the ave~age, the leading universities in the country have only three faculty teaching courses in weed. Scienc~· and they teach only t~o undergraduate and three graduate courses each year. By companson, th e are 15 faculty teaching 13 undergraduate and 19 graduate courses in the leading entomology pr grams in the country. I I i I

192<br />

AGRICULTURE NEEDS MORE WEED SCIENTISTS<br />

Larry J. Kuhns and Tracey L. Harpster!<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>Weed</strong>s ust be controlled to produce marketable crop yields, for human safety, and for aesthetic<br />

reasons. Ph sical methods of weed control are highly labor and/or energy intensive, and in many<br />

cases are m re dangerous to crops and people than herbicides. They are not practical solutions to<br />

most weed roblems in developed countries. Non-chemical control methods used to control insects<br />

and disease, such as selecting and breeding crops for resistance, or developing biological controls,<br />

have limi applications in weed control.<br />

MEfHODS AND MATERIALS<br />

In 199 , current and historical data on pesticide production and use were collected from<br />

governmen and industry sources. It was organized and summarized to show the significance of<br />

herbicides t late twentieth century agriculture.<br />

At the ame time a survey of 15 of the leading universities in the country in entomology<br />

(Alabama, rizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Michigan, Nebraska, North Carolina,<br />

Oregon, Pe nsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington); plant pathology<br />

(Arizona, alifornia, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, New York, New Jersey,<br />

North Car ina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin); and weed science<br />

(Alabama, rkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan,<br />

Mississippj, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin) was conducted.<br />

The num r of Masters and PhD degrees conferred to U.S. citizens and foreign students, graduate<br />

students cu ently enrolled, courses offered, and teaching facuIty were determined. All data<br />

represent a erages of the 15 programs surveyed.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Chem cals are needed to efficiently and effectively control weeds. Only 4.2% of farm<br />

expenditur s were used for all pesticides in 1993 (Table 1). Based on the data in Table 2 (56% of<br />

pesticides sed are herbicides), only about 23% of farm expenditures were used on herbicides.<br />

Herbi ide use steadily increased until 1984 (Table 3). The decrease in use since 1984 is<br />

probably d e to the introduction of new products that are applied at extremely low rates of ai/ha<br />

compared 0 older materials.<br />

Herbi ide use, in terms of product used or expenditures, is greater by a wide margin than that of<br />

insecticid and fungicides combined (Tables 2,3,4).<br />

The .S. produced about 1.3 billion pounds of pesticide with a sales value of $8.25 billion in<br />

1993 (Tab e 5). About two thirds of all pesticides produced in, and exported from, the U.S. are<br />

herbicides (Table 6).<br />

Abou 40% of all of the herbicides used in the world are used in the U.S. (Table 7). Only 32%<br />

of the ins ticides and 14% of the fungicides are used in the U.S.<br />

1Prof. of 0 ental Horticulture and Research Associate.Dept. of Horticulture. The Pennsylvania State<br />

University. niversity Park, PA 16802

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!