Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
168 IMITMCORN YIELD PERFORMANCE* (HulA) 1993 1994 1995 131.9 175.4 146.8 131.9 175.0 147.2 154.7 154.8 * Combined Data, Research, Ministrip, and Farmer Strip Trials **Same Moisture Th following table shows a gene efficacy trial. LmERTY LJNKTMCORN GENE EFFICACY TRIAL 4 Locations - 1995 No Liberty Liberty 42 fl oz St. Error 148.2 154.8 6.1 16.9 17.2 0.2 Hybrid 1 - Williams, fA; Kalamazoo, Ml Hybrid 2 - Ames, fA; Tuscola, Il: R suits showed no yield reduction from the use ofLl'berty®. SUM,"'IL"a!",'Y: A grow Seed Company is a leader in the transferral of new agriculture technology to the farm leve Asgrow Seed Company has been at the forefront in releasing new herbicide tolerant soybean arieties and com hybrids. Concept Farms provide the demonstration, evaluation, and transferral of these .es directly to the user. We have observed a rapid adoption of these new varieties and 15
169 Potential ~pact of Herbicide-Resistant Crops on Specialty and Minor Crops Leonard P. Gianessi 1 This papet'coversthe potentialimpactsof geneticallyengineeredherbicideresistant cultivarsfor min9r crops.The paperfocusesprimarilyon vegetablessincegeneticallyalteringtree and vine crops tojtolerateherbicidesis not likely to gain muchattention. The paper also discusses impactson min01crops of the developmentof herbicideresistantfieldcrops such as soybeans. The minot crop problemis fairlywell known. Thereis an absenceof herbicidesfor most vegetablecrops. lOver70%of vegetablecrops lackeither preemergenceor postemergence herbicidesthat provide effectivebroadspectrumweedcontrol. As a result,vegetablegrowers are forced to use expensive handlabor or plastic to controlweeds. What's the potentialof biotechnologytojprovidemore optionsfor minor crop vegetablegrowers? I Why aren't there moreherbicidesfor minor cropsright now? It's due to the high cost of registrationand ~e potentialrisk of damagingcropsthat are worththousandsof dollars an acre. The costs are high, the risksare high and the marketis small. Herbicidemanufacturershavelittle interestin marketingherbicidesfor minorcrops even if farmershavea demonstratedneed. Will bioengineeredplants offer a way out of thisproblem? National!erbiCidesalesdata demonstratethe disparityin herbicidemarkets. Soybean growers spend $ .5 billion a year on herbicides. Con. growersspendaboutthe same. Com, soybeansand co onjustify the millionsof dollarsrequiredto developa new herbicideand gain registration. Th~ nationalmarketfor potatoherbicidesis $32 million. Thus, an herbicidethat would be a goodlfit for potatoesis unlikelyto be developedunlessit also has com, soybeanor cotton use. All dther vegetablestotal$91 millionin herbicidesales. That's about 30 different crops. These ardvery smallmarkets. Some ha~e said that the U.S. doesn't really need anothersoybeanherbicide. There are 26 herbicideactiveingredientscurrentlyused in soybeans. There is not a lot of handweedingor use of plastic in soybeans. Meanwhile,carrots,lettuceand peppershave three to six herbicides registeredand itiuse. Soybeangrowershave numerouspre and post-emergenceherbicide options. For jUs~ about any weedinfestingsoybeans.there are numerousoptionsfor control. However, U.S. ~rowers are going to have anothermajor herbicideaddedto the soybeanweed control arsenal./ Monsantohas developedglyphosateresistantsoybeans. Throughbiotechnology,soybean plants have beeriengineeredto resistglyphosate. Soybeanplantswithoutthe resistancegene are killed by glyphcrate applications. By plantingthe resistantsoybeanplants,growerswill be able to go over the toprsoybean plantswith glyphosatefor_weedcontrol. One of thereasonswhy soybeangrowersare likelyto adoptthe use of glyphosateis potentialreduction of herbicidecosts. Currently,soybeangrowersaroundthe country spend $22 to $32 an acre fpr their herbicides. The use of glyphosatecouldpotentiallyreducethis cost to $8 i 1 Senior Research ~sociate, National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, 1616 P Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036. !
- Page 118 and 119: ---------T---~~-- 118 EVALUA ON OF
- Page 120 and 121: 120 B USB CONTROL PROVIDED BY LOW V
- Page 122 and 123: ------- 122 W VOLUMEWEED AND BRUSH
- Page 124 and 125: 124 EVA UATION OFGLYPHOSATEFOR DORM
- Page 126 and 127: 126 E ALUATION OF IMAZAMETH FOR WEE
- Page 128 and 129: 128 Presidential Address Delivered
- Page 130 and 131: 130 Ho much land can ten billion pe
- Page 132 and 133: Waggone December 24, 1994 132 count
- Page 134 and 135: Waggone December 24, 1994 134 25 Pa
- Page 136 and 137: Waggone December 24, 1994 136 which
- Page 138 and 139: December 24, 1994 138 sets the pecu
- Page 140 and 141: ----------+---- Waggone December 24
- Page 142 and 143: Waggone December 24, 1994 142 soil
- Page 144 and 145: Waggone December 24, 1994 144 ~oo~
- Page 146 and 147: Waggoner December 24, 1994 146 350
- Page 148 and 149: 148 Appendix Calculate the environm
- Page 150 and 151: 150 alone ac eptably controls typic
- Page 152 and 153: 152 opportu ity to use sethoxydim a
- Page 154 and 155: ---------+----------- 154 IMPACT OF
- Page 156 and 157: 156 The STS® time line: • 1986 -
- Page 158 and 159: -------_. __ ._._--- d •••..
- Page 160 and 161: -----_._~-_._.__.- 160 SYNCBRONYTM.
- Page 162 and 163: 162 Government approvals for Roundu
- Page 164 and 165: HH i ! 164 AG6101 l.oundup Ready®
- Page 166 and 167: 166 n Lib rty LinkTM soybeans will
- Page 170 and 171: 170 to $15 an ere depending upon ho
- Page 172 and 173: 172 e recent occurrence has been th
- Page 174 and 175: 174 He bicide was added to the tiss
- Page 176 and 177: 176 it can at ti es be a weed in Ke
- Page 178 and 179: 178 ty's main campus that Rhizocton
- Page 180 and 181: 180 weight conclu qualit treatm and
- Page 182 and 183: 182 during the st or 2nd growing se
- Page 184 and 185: 184 TABLE 1. Mean raspberry cover (
- Page 186 and 187: 186 (A) STEM VOLUME - SPRING TRTM.,
- Page 188 and 189: 188 concluded at 5.1 em of simulate
- Page 190 and 191: 190 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ank United Agr
- Page 192 and 193: 192 AGRICULTURE NEEDS MORE WEED SCI
- Page 194 and 195: 194 Who is going to provide the edu
- Page 196 and 197: 20 18 - 16 A v 14 e r 12 a g 10 e s
- Page 198 and 199: 198 50th Annual Business Meeting of
- Page 200 and 201: 200 • Graduate team winners were:
- Page 202 and 203: 202 solclose to the New Year, as it
- Page 204 and 205: ----~------ 204 e Committee Reports
- Page 206 and 207: ! I 206 I Administration $1,527.23
- Page 208 and 209: 208 Glickman comments that his "hig
- Page 210 and 211: 210 York Sta~e. It is still unclear
- Page 212 and 213: I I I Bingham, SamuJ Wayne Virginia
- Page 214 and 215: 214 Cianessi, Leonard Nat. Center o
- Page 216 and 217: L I • I I I I Langston, Vemon Dow
169<br />
Potential ~pact of Herbicide-Resistant Crops on Specialty and Minor Crops<br />
Leonard P. Gianessi 1<br />
This papet'coversthe potentialimpactsof geneticallyengineeredherbicideresistant<br />
cultivarsfor min9r crops.The paperfocusesprimarilyon vegetablessincegeneticallyalteringtree<br />
and vine crops tojtolerateherbicidesis not likely to gain muchattention. The paper also discusses<br />
impactson min01crops of the developmentof herbicideresistantfieldcrops such as soybeans.<br />
The minot crop problemis fairlywell known. Thereis an absenceof herbicidesfor most<br />
vegetablecrops. lOver70%of vegetablecrops lackeither preemergenceor postemergence<br />
herbicidesthat provide effectivebroadspectrumweedcontrol. As a result,vegetablegrowers are<br />
forced to use expensive handlabor or plastic to controlweeds. What's the potentialof<br />
biotechnologytojprovidemore optionsfor minor crop vegetablegrowers?<br />
I<br />
Why aren't there moreherbicidesfor minor cropsright now? It's due to the high cost of<br />
registrationand ~e potentialrisk of damagingcropsthat are worththousandsof dollars an acre.<br />
The costs are high, the risksare high and the marketis small. Herbicidemanufacturershavelittle<br />
interestin marketingherbicidesfor minorcrops even if farmershavea demonstratedneed. Will<br />
bioengineeredplants offer a way out of thisproblem?<br />
National!erbiCidesalesdata demonstratethe disparityin herbicidemarkets. Soybean<br />
growers spend $ .5 billion a year on herbicides. Con. growersspendaboutthe same. Com,<br />
soybeansand co onjustify the millionsof dollarsrequiredto developa new herbicideand gain<br />
registration. Th~ nationalmarketfor potatoherbicidesis $32 million. Thus, an herbicidethat<br />
would be a goodlfit for potatoesis unlikelyto be developedunlessit also has com, soybeanor<br />
cotton use. All dther vegetablestotal$91 millionin herbicidesales. That's about 30 different<br />
crops. These ardvery smallmarkets.<br />
Some ha~e said that the U.S. doesn't really need anothersoybeanherbicide. There are 26<br />
herbicideactiveingredientscurrentlyused in soybeans. There is not a lot of handweedingor use<br />
of plastic in soybeans. Meanwhile,carrots,lettuceand peppershave three to six herbicides<br />
registeredand itiuse. Soybeangrowershave numerouspre and post-emergenceherbicide<br />
options. For jUs~ about any weedinfestingsoybeans.there are numerousoptionsfor control.<br />
However, U.S. ~rowers are going to have anothermajor herbicideaddedto the soybeanweed<br />
control arsenal./<br />
Monsantohas developedglyphosateresistantsoybeans. Throughbiotechnology,soybean<br />
plants have beeriengineeredto resistglyphosate. Soybeanplantswithoutthe resistancegene are<br />
killed by glyphcrate applications. By plantingthe resistantsoybeanplants,growerswill be able to<br />
go over the toprsoybean plantswith glyphosatefor_weedcontrol.<br />
One of thereasonswhy soybeangrowersare likelyto adoptthe use of glyphosateis<br />
potentialreduction of herbicidecosts. Currently,soybeangrowersaroundthe country spend $22<br />
to $32 an acre fpr their herbicides. The use of glyphosatecouldpotentiallyreducethis cost to $8<br />
i<br />
1 Senior Research ~sociate, National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, 1616 P Street, NW, Washington,<br />
DC 20036. !