Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

More documents

Recommendations

Info

-------_. __ ._._--- d •••..•. ··r 158 A5545 ST ® YIELD(E u1A) > ....... ••••••••••• -==. ............... ·.22····.·.·.·.·J········ .......... ....~ ......... $,> .............. ... i< •...••••... •••••• •••••••••~H >···>.y.i A5545 55.4 65.0 51.9 57.4 97.4 A5403 58.4 64.5 53.8 58.9 100.0 A5560 56.6 68.0 53.9 59.5 101.0 P9521 54.9 66.6 51.4 57.6 97.7 ~~.~< ... ....................... 8 11 8 27 XT2~...2. ....\ ....... 24 33 24 81 ••••••••••••• Locations in AR, MI, TN, KY, u; and MD A J; 545 is adapted more to the east coast than the mid-south. Farmer side-by-side trials in Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina show an advantage for A5545. Asgrow Concept Farms and Universities conducted gene efficacy trials in 1995, where weeds we: e not a factor (i,e., controlled by herbicides or hand-weeded). The following table shows tha RelianceTM..STSTMand SynchronyTM..STSTMallowed yields equal to or better than the control 01 Pursuit treatments with A2704 soybeans. The addition of Cobra to the tank mixhad a smallimpact on yield. STS® SOYBEANS GENE EFFICACY TRIAL 8 Locations - 1995 I ... I·. ....- . .. . f·. . r ..< .." •••• .. ..: r ",ua_· . . BulA % Coinrol 45.6 100.0 Pu suit 4 fl oz V2 44.7 98.0 Reliance or Synchrony 0.5 oz Re liance or Synchrony 0.5 oz Reliance or Synchrony 0.5 oz + Cobra 4 fl oz V2 V4 V4 46.1 101.1 44.8 98.2 43.4 95.2 Towanda, fL; Tuscola, /L; Atlantic, fA; Purdue University; University of Illinois; Kalamazoo, M/; Custer, DB; Williams /A WPWORK\A W\A5545.D18 5
159 The bene s of the SynchronyTM..STSTM or RelianceTM..STSTM systemare shownin the followingtable, ere weed control was also a determinationin finalyields. An average advantageof2.3 u1Afor SynchronyTM..STSTM and 1.4BuiA for RelianceTM..STSTM was shown versus the conven ionalweed control systemsofPursuit or GalaxyTMlPoast Plus. Resultsof DuPont's on- comparisonsin 1994and 1995have shown similarresults. The SynchronyTM.. STSTMseedlherbi .de system showed a 2.0 BulA advantagein side-by-sidecomparisonsin Illinois and Indianain 19 4. In 1995, over 26 locationsin the sametwo states, the yieldadvantagewas 2.0-3.0 BuiA. 6
Page 1 and 2:
1 DE~LOPING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTIC
Page 3 and 4:
3 MATERIALSANDMETHODS Experiments w
Page 5 and 6:
I 5 I Table 3. Stand density of oat
Page 7 and 8:
7 TaL~NCEaFHNE~CU~TaCL~HarnM Larry
Page 9 and 10:
9 I CONTROLLING QUACKGRASS WITH CLE
Page 11 and 12:
BELTSV~LLE 11 SUSTAINABLEAGRICULTUR
Page 13 and 14:
Ii 13 I The 1996NEWSSCollegiateWeed
Page 15 and 16:
15 EFFECTOF rREPLANT TILLAGEANDNICO
Page 17 and 18:
17 i PENNMUjLCH, A NEW MULCH FOR TU
Page 19 and 20:
19 cover the sta~es in the Northeas
Page 21 and 22:
21 I TABLEt CORN WEED CONTROL EFFIC
Page 23 and 24:
23 COMMON LAMBSQUARTERS CONTROL IN
Page 25 and 26:
I I 25 I Table 2. Effectivaness of
Page 27 and 28:
27 PERFORMANCE OF PREEMERGENCE TREA
Page 29 and 30:
I i I i I I 29 EFFECT OF TANK-MIXIN
Page 31 and 32:
I 31 I EVALVATIONOF WEED CONTROLA
Page 33 and 34:
I I i 33 I EFFECT$ OF EXP 31130A AN
Page 35 and 36:
35 Effect OfPO~T ApplicationTimingo
Page 37 and 38:
II I ! I ! Ii I I 37 PREE~ERGENCE C
Page 39 and 40:
I 39 U+ OF SLUDGE BASED FERTILIZERS
Page 41 and 42:
i I 41 I EFFECT OF fSOXABEN APPLIED
Page 43 and 44:
I 43 ~STCRABGRASS CONTROL AS lWO os
Page 45 and 46:
I II 45 iI Gallery* f,r Weed Preven
Page 47 and 48:
I POTENTIAL I I 47 USE OF EXP-31130
Page 49 and 50:
I" i 49 j PFMERGENCE CONTROL OF PRO
Page 51 and 52:
51 TIIE E...·rL"",,- L OF TRINEXAP
Page 53 and 54:
53 PERF011MANICEOF ISOXAFLUTOLE IN
Page 55 and 56:
55 ISOXAFL OLE COMBINATIONSWITH PRE
Page 57 and 58:
57 Weed Interference in Full Season
Page 59 and 60:
59 HERBICIDE TRATEGIES FOR CONTROL
Page 61 and 62:
61 Table 1.Eff ct of WeedControlTre
Page 63 and 64:
63 DETECTION ND MOVEMENT PATTERN OF
Page 65 and 66:
65 TRAILERING AFETY: A TRAINING COU
Page 67 and 68:
67 EV ALUATIO OF WIT..DFLOWER ESTAB
Page 69 and 70:
69 LlNGSNOW ECOSYSTEM PROJECT: MICR
Page 71 and 72:
71 TABLE 1: Tree . jury provided by
Page 74 and 75:
74 GSNOW ECOSYSTEM PROJECT: WHITE S
Page 76 and 77:
16 cherry (Pnmus se otina ranks fou
Page 78 and 79:
.J 78 Table 1. Density, (D), relati
Page 80 and 81:
~---------_._-~---_.._--- 80 A NEW
Page 82 and 83:
82 WEED AFFINITY GROUPS AS A TOOL I
Page 84 and 85:
84 NEW TE HNIQUE TO COMPARE EFFICAC
Page 86 and 87:
86 PRO UCTION PERFORMANCE OF GLYPHO
Page 88 and 89:
88 Managing nterseeded Cover Crops
Page 90 and 91:
-----------t----~--- 90 Since weed
Page 92 and 93:
92 The mechanistic model (equ. I) a
Page 94 and 95:
94 Exploring the Feasibility of Pro
Page 96 and 97:
96 INHIBI ING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CI
Page 98 and 99:
98 However it .ncreased the control
Page 100 and 101:
100 LIVERWORT AND PEARLWORT MANAGEM
Page 102 and 103:
102 ULFENTRAZONEAND HALOSULFURON:HE
Page 104 and 105:
104 estern New York Nursery IPM Pro
Page 106 and 107:
106 C MMONRAGWEEDCONTROLIN FIELD CO
Page 108 and 109: 108 CGA-77102: A New Herbicide for
Page 110 and 111: 110 POSTEMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLIN SOYB
Page 112 and 113: 112 E FECTS OF REPEATEDLATE-WINTERH
Page 114 and 115: 114 GSNOW ECOSYSTEl\1 PROJECT: NITR
Page 116 and 117: 116 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION GI fosin
Page 118 and 119: ---------T---~~-- 118 EVALUA ON OF
Page 120 and 121: 120 B USB CONTROL PROVIDED BY LOW V
Page 122 and 123: ------- 122 W VOLUMEWEED AND BRUSH
Page 124 and 125: 124 EVA UATION OFGLYPHOSATEFOR DORM
Page 126 and 127: 126 E ALUATION OF IMAZAMETH FOR WEE
Page 128 and 129: 128 Presidential Address Delivered
Page 130 and 131: 130 Ho much land can ten billion pe
Page 132 and 133: Waggone December 24, 1994 132 count
Page 134 and 135: Waggone December 24, 1994 134 25 Pa
Page 136 and 137: Waggone December 24, 1994 136 which
Page 138 and 139: December 24, 1994 138 sets the pecu
Page 140 and 141: ----------+---- Waggone December 24
Page 142 and 143: Waggone December 24, 1994 142 soil
Page 144 and 145: Waggone December 24, 1994 144 ~oo~
Page 146 and 147: Waggoner December 24, 1994 146 350
Page 148 and 149: 148 Appendix Calculate the environm
Page 150 and 151: 150 alone ac eptably controls typic
Page 152 and 153: 152 opportu ity to use sethoxydim a
Page 154 and 155: ---------+----------- 154 IMPACT OF
Page 156 and 157: 156 The STS® time line: • 1986 -
Page 160 and 161: -----_._~-_._.__.- 160 SYNCBRONYTM.
Page 162 and 163: 162 Government approvals for Roundu
Page 164 and 165: HH i ! 164 AG6101 l.oundup Ready®
Page 166 and 167: 166 n Lib rty LinkTM soybeans will
Page 168 and 169: 168 IMITMCORN YIELD PERFORMANCE* (H
Page 170 and 171: 170 to $15 an ere depending upon ho
Page 172 and 173: 172 e recent occurrence has been th
Page 174 and 175: 174 He bicide was added to the tiss
Page 176 and 177: 176 it can at ti es be a weed in Ke
Page 178 and 179: 178 ty's main campus that Rhizocton
Page 180 and 181: 180 weight conclu qualit treatm and
Page 182 and 183: 182 during the st or 2nd growing se
Page 184 and 185: 184 TABLE 1. Mean raspberry cover (
Page 186 and 187: 186 (A) STEM VOLUME - SPRING TRTM.,
Page 188 and 189: 188 concluded at 5.1 em of simulate
Page 190 and 191: 190 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ank United Agr
Page 192 and 193: 192 AGRICULTURE NEEDS MORE WEED SCI
Page 194 and 195: 194 Who is going to provide the edu
Page 196 and 197: 20 18 - 16 A v 14 e r 12 a g 10 e s
Page 198 and 199: 198 50th Annual Business Meeting of
Page 200 and 201: 200 • Graduate team winners were:
Page 202 and 203: 202 solclose to the New Year, as it
Page 204 and 205: ----~------ 204 e Committee Reports
Page 206 and 207: ! I 206 I Administration $1,527.23
Page 208 and 209:
208 Glickman comments that his "hig
Page 210 and 211:
210 York Sta~e. It is still unclear
Page 212 and 213:
I I I Bingham, SamuJ Wayne Virginia
Page 214 and 215:
214 Cianessi, Leonard Nat. Center o
Page 216 and 217:
L I • I I I I Langston, Vemon Dow
Page 218 and 219:
__________ m---+---m__ .... 218 Rie
Page 220 and 221:
-----------~ I I 220 Whalen, Mark Z
Page 222 and 223:
Helicopter Applicators, Inc. Martin
Page 224 and 225:
224 Employers of NEWSS members in 1
Page 226 and 227:
.l I I I I 226 NEWSSPASTPRESIDENTS
Page 228 and 229:
228 AWARD OF MERIT 1971 1972 1973 1
Page 230 and 231:
1995 I I I 230 Fra~cis J. Webb •
Page 232 and 233:
II II 232 1995 1'R~chard Ashly Univ
Page 234 and 235:
234 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1
Page 236 and 237:
I, I 236 1989 - AmeriJan Cyanamid,
Page 238 and 239:
--------_.~-------- 238 RESEARCH PO
Page 240 and 241:
1995 1 - iAComparison of Broadleaf
Page 242 and 243:
242 1960 1961 1962 . The Influence
Page 244 and 245:
244 1975 1 - Control of Jimsonweed
Page 246 and 247:
246 1984 1 - Pre-TransplantOxyfluor
Page 248 and 249:
248 Common or Code name trade Name
Page 250 and 251:
250 Common or Code name , rrade Nam
Page 252 and 253:
252 I Common ot Code namel I I flur
Page 254 and 255:
254 Common o~ Code name' I I i Trad
Page 256 and 257:
256 Common or i Code name I Trade N
Page 258 and 259:
258 , Ackley, J.A .• 7 Adams, R.G
Page 260 and 261:
260 1 I 2,4-D 2, 14, 1~, 22, 23,28,
Page 262 and 263:
262 I Agrosticpalus(ris 47, 48 Agro
Page 264 and 265:
SUBJECT INDEX Application T~mings 4
Page 266 and 267:
266 WEED INDEX Abutilon theop~rosti
show all

Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society