Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

08.06.2015 Views

Waggone December 24, 1994 142 soil furni An n2 of 5 In an appe Yield 50 kg/ha of nitrogen and the rest is applied. Ortiz-Monasterio's yields. show equations. In words, /ha = Function that increases as herbicide and fertilizer lift weeds. Ha field = 5 tons/ Yield t/ha. After conn fertilizer can specif holistic w First I ma rates. On eastward 0 increases contours 0 because th soil furni eastward a A ridge of herbicide Expense E = [e(a) * Ha field] + [e(h) * Ha field * kg/ha herbicide] + [e(n) * Ha field * kg/ha fertilizer]. cting herbicide to weeds, then weeds and rate to yield, then area all the way to expense, I exchange rates and reason in an integrated or y. yield on coordinates of herbicide and fertilizer he map of Fig 10, the rate of herbicide increases right from 0 to 2 kg/ha and of fertilizer orthward toward the top from 0 to 250 kg/ha. The yield rise little up the left, western boundary fertilizer is wasted on weedy crop. Because the hes some nitrogen, the contours of yield do rise ong the bottom boundary as herbicide kills weeds. high yields curves up northeastward where nd fertilizer increase in step.

Waggoner December 24, 1994 143 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.~ ).,Ị . J 1.~ 2 2.5 4 I ./4.5 y Fig 10. The c ntours of yield on a map where herbicide increases eas ward or right from 0 to 2 kg/ha and fertilizer increases nor hward or toward the to from 0 to 250 k /ha. A critic marc ing to the drummer of fertilizer and pesticide fallout imput s high exchange rates of environmental currency to a kg of ch mical--but zero environmental currency to a hectare of la d cropped. The critic might set exchange rates of 200 for he bicide and 1 for fertilizer but 0 for land. The ridge of risi g yield in Fig 10 becomes a valley of environmental economy in Fig 11 because the higher yields shrink hectar s land to grow the specified 5 tons, causing kg of chemicals 0 increase less than the rates kg/ha. Nevertheless, high exchange rates for chemicals and zero for tilling land uts minimum expense in the southwest corner where no chem'cals are applied over many hectares.

Waggone<br />

December 24, 1994<br />

142<br />

soil furni<br />

An n2 of 5<br />

In an appe<br />

Yield<br />

50 kg/ha of nitrogen and the rest is applied.<br />

Ortiz-Monasterio's yields.<br />

show equations.<br />

In words,<br />

/ha = Function that increases as herbicide and<br />

fertilizer lift weeds.<br />

Ha field = 5 tons/ Yield t/ha.<br />

After conn<br />

fertilizer<br />

can specif<br />

holistic w<br />

First I ma<br />

rates. On<br />

eastward 0<br />

increases<br />

contours 0<br />

because th<br />

soil furni<br />

eastward a<br />

A ridge of<br />

herbicide<br />

Expense E = [e(a) * Ha field] +<br />

[e(h) * Ha field * kg/ha herbicide] +<br />

[e(n) * Ha field * kg/ha fertilizer].<br />

cting herbicide to weeds, then weeds and<br />

rate to yield, then area all the way to expense, I<br />

exchange rates and reason in an integrated or<br />

y.<br />

yield on coordinates of herbicide and fertilizer<br />

he map of Fig 10, the rate of herbicide increases<br />

right from 0 to 2 kg/ha and of fertilizer<br />

orthward toward the top from 0 to 250 kg/ha. The<br />

yield rise little up the left, western boundary<br />

fertilizer is wasted on weedy crop. Because the<br />

hes some nitrogen, the contours of yield do rise<br />

ong the bottom boundary as herbicide kills weeds.<br />

high yields curves up northeastward where<br />

nd fertilizer increase in step.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!