Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Waggone December 24, 1994 142 soil furni An n2 of 5 In an appe Yield 50 kg/ha of nitrogen and the rest is applied. Ortiz-Monasterio's yields. show equations. In words, /ha = Function that increases as herbicide and fertilizer lift weeds. Ha field = 5 tons/ Yield t/ha. After conn fertilizer can specif holistic w First I ma rates. On eastward 0 increases contours 0 because th soil furni eastward a A ridge of herbicide Expense E = [e(a) * Ha field] + [e(h) * Ha field * kg/ha herbicide] + [e(n) * Ha field * kg/ha fertilizer]. cting herbicide to weeds, then weeds and rate to yield, then area all the way to expense, I exchange rates and reason in an integrated or y. yield on coordinates of herbicide and fertilizer he map of Fig 10, the rate of herbicide increases right from 0 to 2 kg/ha and of fertilizer orthward toward the top from 0 to 250 kg/ha. The yield rise little up the left, western boundary fertilizer is wasted on weedy crop. Because the hes some nitrogen, the contours of yield do rise ong the bottom boundary as herbicide kills weeds. high yields curves up northeastward where nd fertilizer increase in step.
Waggoner December 24, 1994 143 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.~ ).,Ị . J 1.~ 2 2.5 4 I ./4.5 y Fig 10. The c ntours of yield on a map where herbicide increases eas ward or right from 0 to 2 kg/ha and fertilizer increases nor hward or toward the to from 0 to 250 k /ha. A critic marc ing to the drummer of fertilizer and pesticide fallout imput s high exchange rates of environmental currency to a kg of ch mical--but zero environmental currency to a hectare of la d cropped. The critic might set exchange rates of 200 for he bicide and 1 for fertilizer but 0 for land. The ridge of risi g yield in Fig 10 becomes a valley of environmental economy in Fig 11 because the higher yields shrink hectar s land to grow the specified 5 tons, causing kg of chemicals 0 increase less than the rates kg/ha. Nevertheless, high exchange rates for chemicals and zero for tilling land uts minimum expense in the southwest corner where no chem'cals are applied over many hectares.
- Page 92 and 93: 92 The mechanistic model (equ. I) a
- Page 94 and 95: 94 Exploring the Feasibility of Pro
- Page 96 and 97: 96 INHIBI ING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CI
- Page 98 and 99: 98 However it .ncreased the control
- Page 100 and 101: 100 LIVERWORT AND PEARLWORT MANAGEM
- Page 102 and 103: 102 ULFENTRAZONEAND HALOSULFURON:HE
- Page 104 and 105: 104 estern New York Nursery IPM Pro
- Page 106 and 107: 106 C MMONRAGWEEDCONTROLIN FIELD CO
- Page 108 and 109: 108 CGA-77102: A New Herbicide for
- Page 110 and 111: 110 POSTEMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLIN SOYB
- Page 112 and 113: 112 E FECTS OF REPEATEDLATE-WINTERH
- Page 114 and 115: 114 GSNOW ECOSYSTEl\1 PROJECT: NITR
- Page 116 and 117: 116 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION GI fosin
- Page 118 and 119: ---------T---~~-- 118 EVALUA ON OF
- Page 120 and 121: 120 B USB CONTROL PROVIDED BY LOW V
- Page 122 and 123: ------- 122 W VOLUMEWEED AND BRUSH
- Page 124 and 125: 124 EVA UATION OFGLYPHOSATEFOR DORM
- Page 126 and 127: 126 E ALUATION OF IMAZAMETH FOR WEE
- Page 128 and 129: 128 Presidential Address Delivered
- Page 130 and 131: 130 Ho much land can ten billion pe
- Page 132 and 133: Waggone December 24, 1994 132 count
- Page 134 and 135: Waggone December 24, 1994 134 25 Pa
- Page 136 and 137: Waggone December 24, 1994 136 which
- Page 138 and 139: December 24, 1994 138 sets the pecu
- Page 140 and 141: ----------+---- Waggone December 24
- Page 144 and 145: Waggone December 24, 1994 144 ~oo~
- Page 146 and 147: Waggoner December 24, 1994 146 350
- Page 148 and 149: 148 Appendix Calculate the environm
- Page 150 and 151: 150 alone ac eptably controls typic
- Page 152 and 153: 152 opportu ity to use sethoxydim a
- Page 154 and 155: ---------+----------- 154 IMPACT OF
- Page 156 and 157: 156 The STS® time line: • 1986 -
- Page 158 and 159: -------_. __ ._._--- d •••..
- Page 160 and 161: -----_._~-_._.__.- 160 SYNCBRONYTM.
- Page 162 and 163: 162 Government approvals for Roundu
- Page 164 and 165: HH i ! 164 AG6101 l.oundup Ready®
- Page 166 and 167: 166 n Lib rty LinkTM soybeans will
- Page 168 and 169: 168 IMITMCORN YIELD PERFORMANCE* (H
- Page 170 and 171: 170 to $15 an ere depending upon ho
- Page 172 and 173: 172 e recent occurrence has been th
- Page 174 and 175: 174 He bicide was added to the tiss
- Page 176 and 177: 176 it can at ti es be a weed in Ke
- Page 178 and 179: 178 ty's main campus that Rhizocton
- Page 180 and 181: 180 weight conclu qualit treatm and
- Page 182 and 183: 182 during the st or 2nd growing se
- Page 184 and 185: 184 TABLE 1. Mean raspberry cover (
- Page 186 and 187: 186 (A) STEM VOLUME - SPRING TRTM.,
- Page 188 and 189: 188 concluded at 5.1 em of simulate
- Page 190 and 191: 190 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ank United Agr
Waggone<br />
December 24, 1994<br />
142<br />
soil furni<br />
An n2 of 5<br />
In an appe<br />
Yield<br />
50 kg/ha of nitrogen and the rest is applied.<br />
Ortiz-Monasterio's yields.<br />
show equations.<br />
In words,<br />
/ha = Function that increases as herbicide and<br />
fertilizer lift weeds.<br />
Ha field = 5 tons/ Yield t/ha.<br />
After conn<br />
fertilizer<br />
can specif<br />
holistic w<br />
First I ma<br />
rates. On<br />
eastward 0<br />
increases<br />
contours 0<br />
because th<br />
soil furni<br />
eastward a<br />
A ridge of<br />
herbicide<br />
Expense E = [e(a) * Ha field] +<br />
[e(h) * Ha field * kg/ha herbicide] +<br />
[e(n) * Ha field * kg/ha fertilizer].<br />
cting herbicide to weeds, then weeds and<br />
rate to yield, then area all the way to expense, I<br />
exchange rates and reason in an integrated or<br />
y.<br />
yield on coordinates of herbicide and fertilizer<br />
he map of Fig 10, the rate of herbicide increases<br />
right from 0 to 2 kg/ha and of fertilizer<br />
orthward toward the top from 0 to 250 kg/ha. The<br />
yield rise little up the left, western boundary<br />
fertilizer is wasted on weedy crop. Because the<br />
hes some nitrogen, the contours of yield do rise<br />
ong the bottom boundary as herbicide kills weeds.<br />
high yields curves up northeastward where<br />
nd fertilizer increase in step.