Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
126<br />
E ALUATION OF IMAZAMETH FOR WEED CONlROL IN WIlDFLOWER<br />
ESTABLISHMENT<br />
Chad W. Spackman, Jon M. Johnson, and Larry J. Kuhns 1J<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
As p of a cooperative project between the Pennsylvania State University and the<br />
Pennsylv .a Department of Transportation, a study was initiated to evaluate imazamethv at 0.094<br />
and 0.188 bs/ac for both pre and postemergent weed control in establishment of annual<br />
wildflowe . All treatments contained a surfactantvand drift control agent41. The study area was<br />
located at enn State's Landscape Management Research Center and was arranged in a randomized<br />
complete lock design with three replications. The area was treated with 4lbs/ac glyphosate on<br />
May 6, 19 6, to control all existing vegetation. On May 20 it was rototilled to a depth of 8 in, and<br />
seededwi an annual wildflower mix containing cosmos (CosmosbipinnatusCav.), cornflower<br />
(Centaure cyanus L.), corn poppy (Papaverrhoeas L.), rocket larkspur (Delphiniumajacis L.),<br />
sweet aly sum (DianthusbarbatusL.), and tall plains coreopsis (CoreopsistinctoriaNutt.) at 14<br />
lbs/ac, mergent treatments were applied May 31, as a few cosmos seedlings were emerging,<br />
to 6 by 1 ft plots using a CO2-powered hand held sprayer equipped with Spraying Systems XR<br />
8004 VS pray tips, delivering 40 GPA at 35 psi. Postemergent treatments were applied June 28<br />
and all . dflower species, except rocket larkspur, were present within the treated plots.<br />
Predomin t weeds included smooth pigweed (Amaranthuskybridus L.), common yellow<br />
woodsorr I (OxalisstrictoL.), green foxtail (SetariaviridisL.), common lambsquarters<br />
(Chenop ium albumL.) and common dandelion (TaraxacumofficinaleL.), and were uniformly<br />
mixed ng the flowers. Ground cover ratings and average canopy heights of both wildflowers<br />
and weed were taken June 28, July 25, and September 11. Results of the weed ratings are<br />
reported i Table la and wildflower ratings in Table lb.<br />
Ima eth provided excellent preemergence weed control through the September rating period.<br />
Camp to the untreated check, the postemergence applications reduced weed height at the July<br />
rating, bu not weed cover. By September, there were no differences in weed cover or height<br />
between e postemergence treated areas and the untreated check. Ground cover by wildflowers<br />
was not s gnificantly different for treatments at either the June or September rating periods,<br />
however e 0.188 lb/ac post treatment had less cover in July than the pre and untreated plots. Pre<br />
treatmen provided the lowest wildflower canopy heights in June but were not different from the<br />
check in eptember, while the post treated plots stunted the wildflowers and provided the lowest<br />
canopy h ights in both July and September. Overall, there was little difference between application<br />
rate for ether the pre or postemergent treated plots for all ratings of weeds and wildflowers. It was<br />
observed that treated plots did affect the growth of the wildflowers compared to the untreated<br />
check; e .ally cosmos, which had a noticeable increase in stem diameter and axillarybranching<br />
near the ase of the stem. A germination test was conducted indoors and all wildflower species<br />
germina ; however, rocket larkspur did not germinate in any field plots, including the check. All<br />
other s .es were present within the untreated and postemergent treated plots and these same<br />
species, xcept sweet alyssum, were present within the preemergent treated plots. <strong>Weed</strong> species<br />
present a the end of the study were identical to the initial species.<br />
A mergent treatment at either application rate provided a significant decrease in the amount<br />
of weeds and provided comparable amounts of wildflowers to the untreated check. Sweet alyssum<br />
does not ppear to be tolerant to a preemergent treatment so species must be carefully selected<br />
when se .ng, Postemergent applied treatments showed no improvement of weed control<br />
comp to the check and temporarily thinned the wildflowers.<br />
11Re Technologist, Project Assistant, and Professor of Ornamental Horticulture, respectively, The<br />
Pen lvania State University, University Park, PA.<br />
21Plateau American Cyanamid Co., Wayne, NJ.<br />
31Qwik et 357 (Exacto Inc.) @ 0.125% (v/v).<br />
41Poly AlOOI (Exacto Inc.) @ 0.25% (v/v).