08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

---------T---~~--<br />

118<br />

EVALUA<br />

ON OF HERBICIDES FOR CONTROL OF CANADA THISTLE IN FINE FESCUE<br />

Chad W. Spackman, Jon M. Johnson, and Larry J. Kuhnsl/<br />

ABSTRACf<br />

As part of a cooperative project between the Pennsylvania State University and the<br />

Pennsylv .a Department of Transportation, a trial was established to evaluate several herbicides<br />

for selectiv control of Canada thistle (CirsiumarvenseL.) within a stand of fine fescue. The<br />

study area as located within an established stand of fine fescue, comprised predominantly of hard<br />

fescue (Fe tucalongifoliaThuill.), at Penn State's Landscape Management Research Center and<br />

arranged' a randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatments included an<br />

untreated c eck, 0.75 lbs/ac diglycolamine salt of dicamba (dicamba), 0.35 lbs/ac SAN 1269H<br />

alone and' combination with O.5lbs/ac dicamba, 0.23lbslac clopyralid, 0.75lbs/ac dicamba in<br />

combinati n with 0.12Ibs/ac clopyralid or 0.0121bs/ac metsulfuron methyl, 2lbs/ac glyphosate, 1<br />

lb/ac tricl yr, and 0.1881bs/ac imazameth. All treatments, except glyphosate, contained 0.125%<br />

(v/v) surf tant21and all contained 0.25% (v/v) drift control agent 3 /. Application was made to 6 by<br />

10 ft plots n June 12, 1996, using a C02-powered hand held sprayer equipped with Spraying<br />

Systems 8004 VS spray tips, delivering 40 GPA at 35 psi. Ground cover ratings of the fine<br />

fescue we taken June 12; July 24, 43 days after treatment (DAT); and August 30, 79 DAT. An<br />

initial cou t of thistle stems within the plots was taken June 12. A count of uncontrolled thistle<br />

stems and istle resprouts was taken July 24 and August 30. These values were utilized for<br />

determinin percent thistle resprouts and percent thistle decline, which evaluates the extent of<br />

decline of e originally treated stems and was affected by either treatment or natural senescence.<br />

Percent de line and resprouting results are reported in Table 1.<br />

All tre tments, except triclopyr or imazameth, provided similar levels of thistle decline at the<br />

July 24 ra ng. Triclopyr was slightly lower, while imazameth was not different from theuntreated<br />

check. D to natural senescence of the thistle plants, an increase in thistle decline was evident at<br />

the Augus rating, as the untreated check escalated from 15 percent decline in July to 64 percent in<br />

August. I other treatments, excluding the check and imazameth, provided similar levels of<br />

decline at e August rating. Percent thistle resprouting values at the July rating were similar for all<br />

treatments except triclopyr with the highest level at 37 percent. There was no significant<br />

difference among treatments at the August rating except for imazameth, which actually resprouted<br />

by 151 pe nt. None of the treatments thinned the fine fescue stand but imazameth provided<br />

slight n sis to the leaf tips.<br />

All tre tments, except imazameth, provided selective control of treated thistles; but all still had<br />

significan resprouting occur. No treatment provided an overall acceptable level of control,<br />

therefore peat applications would benecessary to eliminate the thistle.<br />

1/ Researc Technologist, Project Assistant, and Professor of Ornamental Horticulture, respectively, The<br />

Penns lvania State University, University Park, PA.<br />

21Qwik:W 357 (Exacto Inc.)<br />

3/ Polytex 1001 (Exacto Inc.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!