Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
---------T---~~--<br />
118<br />
EVALUA<br />
ON OF HERBICIDES FOR CONTROL OF CANADA THISTLE IN FINE FESCUE<br />
Chad W. Spackman, Jon M. Johnson, and Larry J. Kuhnsl/<br />
ABSTRACf<br />
As part of a cooperative project between the Pennsylvania State University and the<br />
Pennsylv .a Department of Transportation, a trial was established to evaluate several herbicides<br />
for selectiv control of Canada thistle (CirsiumarvenseL.) within a stand of fine fescue. The<br />
study area as located within an established stand of fine fescue, comprised predominantly of hard<br />
fescue (Fe tucalongifoliaThuill.), at Penn State's Landscape Management Research Center and<br />
arranged' a randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatments included an<br />
untreated c eck, 0.75 lbs/ac diglycolamine salt of dicamba (dicamba), 0.35 lbs/ac SAN 1269H<br />
alone and' combination with O.5lbs/ac dicamba, 0.23lbslac clopyralid, 0.75lbs/ac dicamba in<br />
combinati n with 0.12Ibs/ac clopyralid or 0.0121bs/ac metsulfuron methyl, 2lbs/ac glyphosate, 1<br />
lb/ac tricl yr, and 0.1881bs/ac imazameth. All treatments, except glyphosate, contained 0.125%<br />
(v/v) surf tant21and all contained 0.25% (v/v) drift control agent 3 /. Application was made to 6 by<br />
10 ft plots n June 12, 1996, using a C02-powered hand held sprayer equipped with Spraying<br />
Systems 8004 VS spray tips, delivering 40 GPA at 35 psi. Ground cover ratings of the fine<br />
fescue we taken June 12; July 24, 43 days after treatment (DAT); and August 30, 79 DAT. An<br />
initial cou t of thistle stems within the plots was taken June 12. A count of uncontrolled thistle<br />
stems and istle resprouts was taken July 24 and August 30. These values were utilized for<br />
determinin percent thistle resprouts and percent thistle decline, which evaluates the extent of<br />
decline of e originally treated stems and was affected by either treatment or natural senescence.<br />
Percent de line and resprouting results are reported in Table 1.<br />
All tre tments, except triclopyr or imazameth, provided similar levels of thistle decline at the<br />
July 24 ra ng. Triclopyr was slightly lower, while imazameth was not different from theuntreated<br />
check. D to natural senescence of the thistle plants, an increase in thistle decline was evident at<br />
the Augus rating, as the untreated check escalated from 15 percent decline in July to 64 percent in<br />
August. I other treatments, excluding the check and imazameth, provided similar levels of<br />
decline at e August rating. Percent thistle resprouting values at the July rating were similar for all<br />
treatments except triclopyr with the highest level at 37 percent. There was no significant<br />
difference among treatments at the August rating except for imazameth, which actually resprouted<br />
by 151 pe nt. None of the treatments thinned the fine fescue stand but imazameth provided<br />
slight n sis to the leaf tips.<br />
All tre tments, except imazameth, provided selective control of treated thistles; but all still had<br />
significan resprouting occur. No treatment provided an overall acceptable level of control,<br />
therefore peat applications would benecessary to eliminate the thistle.<br />
1/ Researc Technologist, Project Assistant, and Professor of Ornamental Horticulture, respectively, The<br />
Penns lvania State University, University Park, PA.<br />
21Qwik:W 357 (Exacto Inc.)<br />
3/ Polytex 1001 (Exacto Inc.)