Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
116 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION GI fosinate provided rapid bumdown of all of the weeds in the treated areas (Table 1). There was ittle regrowth in these areas, even where glufosinate alone was used. There was apparently orne herbicide residue in this area from prior applications by the Pennsylvania Departme of Transportation. No conclusions can be reached on the effectiveness of the preemerge ce herbicides used in this part of the study. Ini 'ally, all of the treatments including glyphosate provided good to excellent control of all weeds. H wever, by August 22 it appeared that applying glyphosate prior to the treatments containing oxyfluorfen resulted in better control than applying glyphosate and oxyf1uorfen together. he rating on October 24 confirmed this. The oxyfluorfen must injure the weed foliage before the lyphosate can be absorbed and translocated. Perennial weeds were burned down by the combi ation, but were able to regrow if the oxyfluorfen interfered with the activity of the glyphosat . In is study, adding thiazopyr to the oxyfluorfen did not consistently improve the level of preemerge ce weed control obtained. In the area to which glyphosate was applied prior to treatment, xyfluorfen alone or in combination with thiazopyr provided better control than the glyphosat alone. The control provided by thiazopyr at O:Slb/aalone was no better than that provided glyphosate alone. Thiazopyr at 1.0 and 2.0 lb/a alone provided a level of control between g phosate alone and the treatments including oxyf1uorfen Th roadside environment is extremely variable. Soils are mixed, gravel and grit are added in variable amounts, and highly active, long residual herbicides are periodically added. In addition, wide mixture of annual and perennial weeds may be present. Several years of testing on a varie of sites is necessary to determine the suitability of a herbicide for use along roadsides.
117 Table 1. Percent g een cover ratings in areas treated with preemergence herbicides on June 27 or July 8, 1 . The June 27 applications included glyphosate at 21b/a. On June 27 glyphos e or glufosinate, at 21b/a, were applied to areas on which the preemergence herbicid were applied on July 8. Rate % Oreen Cover l l Chemical (lblA) July 22 August 22 October 24 Control 82a 98a 90a Thiazopyr + Olyp osate 0.5 + 2.0 5he 10 cdef 7 e Thiazopyr + Olyp osate 1.0 + 2.0 8he 28 bed 33 bed Thiazopyr + Olyp osate 2.0+ 2.0 10 he 18 cde 33 bed Thiazopyr + Ox uorfen + Olyphosate 0.5 +1.6 + 2.0 14 b 43 b SOb Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfen + Olyphosate 1.0 +1.6 + 2.0 9bc 30 he SOb Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfen + Olyphosate 2.0 +1.6 + 2.0 14 b 27 bed 48b Oxyfluorfen + 01 hosate 1.6 + 2.0 5he 25 bede 45 be Oryzalin + Oxyfl rfen + Olyphosate 4.0 +1.6 + 2.0 5he 28 bed 33 bed 01 hosate 2.0 7bc 22 cde 35 bed Thiazopyra 0.5 9he 20 cde 43 be Thiazopyre 1.0 4c 8 def 13 de Thiazopyr-' 2.0 3 c 6 ef 11 de Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfena 0.5 + 1.6 2 c 4 f 6 e Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfenll 1.0 + 1.6 2 c 3 f 4e Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfen-' 2.0 + 1.6 1 c 1 f 2 e Oxyfluorf enll 1.6 1 c 4 f 6 e Oryzalin + Oxyfl orfenll 4.0 +1.6 2 c 4 f 11 de Olyphosate1l 2.0 2 c 9 def 33 bed Thiazopyrk 0.5 lhe 3 f 4e Thiazopyra 1.0 1 c 3 f 5 e Thiazopyr" 2.0 1 c 3 f 5 e Thiazopyr + Oxy 0.5 + 1.6 1 c 4 f 6 e Thiazopyr + Oxy 1.0 + 1.6 1 c 2 f 3 e Thiazopyr + Oxy 2.0 + 1.6 1 c 1 f 1 e Oxyfluorfene 1.6 1 c 1 f 1 e Oryzalin + Oxyfl orfe~ 4.0 +1.6 1 c 1 f o e Glufosinatek 2.0 1 c 1 f 5 e 11 Means within olumns, followed by the same letter, do not differ at the 5% level of significance (DMRT). 1l Applied July , 1996. Olyphosate (Roundup Pro) was applied at 2lb/a on June 27. 2LApplied July 1996. Olufosinate was applied at 2lb/a on June 27.
- Page 65 and 66: 65 TRAILERING AFETY: A TRAINING COU
- Page 67 and 68: 67 EV ALUATIO OF WIT..DFLOWER ESTAB
- Page 69 and 70: 69 LlNGSNOW ECOSYSTEM PROJECT: MICR
- Page 71 and 72: 71 TABLE 1: Tree . jury provided by
- Page 74 and 75: 74 GSNOW ECOSYSTEM PROJECT: WHITE S
- Page 76 and 77: 16 cherry (Pnmus se otina ranks fou
- Page 78 and 79: .J 78 Table 1. Density, (D), relati
- Page 80 and 81: ~---------_._-~---_.._--- 80 A NEW
- Page 82 and 83: 82 WEED AFFINITY GROUPS AS A TOOL I
- Page 84 and 85: 84 NEW TE HNIQUE TO COMPARE EFFICAC
- Page 86 and 87: 86 PRO UCTION PERFORMANCE OF GLYPHO
- Page 88 and 89: 88 Managing nterseeded Cover Crops
- Page 90 and 91: -----------t----~--- 90 Since weed
- Page 92 and 93: 92 The mechanistic model (equ. I) a
- Page 94 and 95: 94 Exploring the Feasibility of Pro
- Page 96 and 97: 96 INHIBI ING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CI
- Page 98 and 99: 98 However it .ncreased the control
- Page 100 and 101: 100 LIVERWORT AND PEARLWORT MANAGEM
- Page 102 and 103: 102 ULFENTRAZONEAND HALOSULFURON:HE
- Page 104 and 105: 104 estern New York Nursery IPM Pro
- Page 106 and 107: 106 C MMONRAGWEEDCONTROLIN FIELD CO
- Page 108 and 109: 108 CGA-77102: A New Herbicide for
- Page 110 and 111: 110 POSTEMERGENCEWEEDCONTROLIN SOYB
- Page 112 and 113: 112 E FECTS OF REPEATEDLATE-WINTERH
- Page 114 and 115: 114 GSNOW ECOSYSTEl\1 PROJECT: NITR
- Page 118 and 119: ---------T---~~-- 118 EVALUA ON OF
- Page 120 and 121: 120 B USB CONTROL PROVIDED BY LOW V
- Page 122 and 123: ------- 122 W VOLUMEWEED AND BRUSH
- Page 124 and 125: 124 EVA UATION OFGLYPHOSATEFOR DORM
- Page 126 and 127: 126 E ALUATION OF IMAZAMETH FOR WEE
- Page 128 and 129: 128 Presidential Address Delivered
- Page 130 and 131: 130 Ho much land can ten billion pe
- Page 132 and 133: Waggone December 24, 1994 132 count
- Page 134 and 135: Waggone December 24, 1994 134 25 Pa
- Page 136 and 137: Waggone December 24, 1994 136 which
- Page 138 and 139: December 24, 1994 138 sets the pecu
- Page 140 and 141: ----------+---- Waggone December 24
- Page 142 and 143: Waggone December 24, 1994 142 soil
- Page 144 and 145: Waggone December 24, 1994 144 ~oo~
- Page 146 and 147: Waggoner December 24, 1994 146 350
- Page 148 and 149: 148 Appendix Calculate the environm
- Page 150 and 151: 150 alone ac eptably controls typic
- Page 152 and 153: 152 opportu ity to use sethoxydim a
- Page 154 and 155: ---------+----------- 154 IMPACT OF
- Page 156 and 157: 156 The STS® time line: • 1986 -
- Page 158 and 159: -------_. __ ._._--- d •••..
- Page 160 and 161: -----_._~-_._.__.- 160 SYNCBRONYTM.
- Page 162 and 163: 162 Government approvals for Roundu
- Page 164 and 165: HH i ! 164 AG6101 l.oundup Ready®
117<br />
Table 1. Percent g een cover ratings in areas treated with preemergence herbicides on June 27 or<br />
July 8, 1 . The June 27 applications included glyphosate at 21b/a. On June 27<br />
glyphos e or glufosinate, at 21b/a, were applied to areas on which the preemergence<br />
herbicid were applied on July 8.<br />
Rate<br />
% Oreen Cover l l<br />
Chemical (lblA) July 22 August 22 October 24<br />
Control 82a 98a 90a<br />
Thiazopyr + Olyp osate 0.5 + 2.0 5he 10 cdef 7 e<br />
Thiazopyr + Olyp osate 1.0 + 2.0 8he 28 bed 33 bed<br />
Thiazopyr + Olyp osate 2.0+ 2.0 10 he 18 cde 33 bed<br />
Thiazopyr + Ox uorfen + Olyphosate 0.5 +1.6 + 2.0 14 b 43 b SOb<br />
Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfen + Olyphosate 1.0 +1.6 + 2.0 9bc 30 he SOb<br />
Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfen + Olyphosate 2.0 +1.6 + 2.0 14 b 27 bed 48b<br />
Oxyfluorfen + 01 hosate 1.6 + 2.0 5he 25 bede 45 be<br />
Oryzalin + Oxyfl rfen + Olyphosate 4.0 +1.6 + 2.0 5he 28 bed 33 bed<br />
01 hosate 2.0 7bc 22 cde 35 bed<br />
Thiazopyra 0.5 9he 20 cde 43 be<br />
Thiazopyre 1.0 4c 8 def 13 de<br />
Thiazopyr-' 2.0 3 c 6 ef 11 de<br />
Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfena 0.5 + 1.6 2 c 4 f 6 e<br />
Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfenll 1.0 + 1.6 2 c 3 f 4e<br />
Thiazopyr + Oxy uorfen-' 2.0 + 1.6 1 c 1 f 2 e<br />
Oxyfluorf enll 1.6 1 c 4 f 6 e<br />
Oryzalin + Oxyfl orfenll 4.0 +1.6 2 c 4 f 11 de<br />
Olyphosate1l 2.0 2 c 9 def 33 bed<br />
Thiazopyrk 0.5 lhe 3 f 4e<br />
Thiazopyra 1.0 1 c 3 f 5 e<br />
Thiazopyr" 2.0 1 c 3 f 5 e<br />
Thiazopyr + Oxy 0.5 + 1.6 1 c 4 f 6 e<br />
Thiazopyr + Oxy 1.0 + 1.6 1 c 2 f 3 e<br />
Thiazopyr + Oxy 2.0 + 1.6 1 c 1 f 1 e<br />
Oxyfluorfene 1.6 1 c 1 f 1 e<br />
Oryzalin + Oxyfl orfe~ 4.0 +1.6 1 c 1 f o e<br />
Glufosinatek 2.0 1 c 1 f 5 e<br />
11 Means within olumns, followed by the same letter, do not differ at the 5% level of significance<br />
(DMRT).<br />
1l Applied July , 1996. Olyphosate (Roundup Pro) was applied at 2lb/a on June 27.<br />
2LApplied July 1996. Olufosinate was applied at 2lb/a on June 27.