Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 51â1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
115<br />
CONTROLL NO ROADSIDE VEOEf ATION WITH THIAZOPYR, OXYFLUORFEN,<br />
OLUFOSINA TE, AND OLYPHOSA TE<br />
Larry J. Kuhns and Tracey L. Harpster!<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
must be controlled under guiderails to allow water to flow uniformly away from<br />
the road surface d to allow their clear visibility to drivers. The objective of this study was to<br />
evaluate the resid al activity of two preemergence herbicides, oxyfluorfen and thiazopyr, in the<br />
roadside enviro ent. They were used in combination with one of two postemergence herbicides,<br />
glufosinate or gly hosate 2 , to eliminate existing weeds in the treated areas.<br />
MEfHODS<br />
The pree ergence treatments evaluated were thiazopyr alone at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 lb/a; the<br />
same treatments p us oxyfluorfen at 1.61b/a; oxyfluorfen alone at 1.6Ib/a; and oryzalin plus<br />
oxyfluorfen at 4 d 1.61b/a, respectively. The postemergence treatments included the addition of<br />
glyphosate at 2 lb to a set of the preemergence treatments, or applications of either glyphosate at 2<br />
lb/a or glufosinat at 2 lb/a 11 days prior to the application of the preemergence treatments. Table 1<br />
includes a summ of the treatments.<br />
Treatmen were applied to 75 ft2 plots with a C02 pressurized test plot sprayer at 30 psi<br />
through two 8004 nozzles mounted in a double swivel nozzle body to eliminate the shadow effect I<br />
around support ts; in 38 OPA. The combination of preemergence herbicides and glyphosate<br />
was applied on Ju e 27,1996. At the same time, the applications of glyphosate or glufosinate<br />
alone were made. On July 8, the preemergence treatments were applied over the areas previously<br />
treated with glyp sate or glufosinate. Treatments were applied in a randomized complete block<br />
design, with thr replications.<br />
The study was conducted along a roadside under guiderails in two areas about 400 yards<br />
apart. Two replic tions of the treatments including glyphosate were in one area, and the other<br />
replication plus al three replications with glufosinate were in the other. The predominant weeds in<br />
the glyphosate ar at the time of application were common ragweed (AmbrosiaartemisiifoliaL.),<br />
birdsfoot trefoil ( tus comiculatusL.), wild carrot (DaucuscarotaL.), and crownvetch (Coronilla<br />
varia L.). Other eeds distributed throughout were wild buckwheat (Polygonumconvolvulus<br />
L.), common spe well (VeronicaofficinalisL.), bull thistle (Cirsiumvulgare(Savi) Tenore.),<br />
common burdock (Arctiumminus (Hill) Bemh.), goldenrod (Solidagospp), green foxtail (Setaria<br />
viridis (L.) Beau .), red fescue (FestucarubraL.), and garlic mustard (Alliariapetiolata (Bieb.)<br />
Cavara & Grand . Ragweed was 6 to 12 inches tall, all others were 3 to 6 inches tall. The<br />
predominant w s in the glufosinate treated area were wild carrot, common ragweed, spotted<br />
knapweed (Centa reamaculosaLam.), birdsfoot trefoil, and yellow foxtail (Setarialutescens<br />
(Weigel) Hubb.). The weed density and size in this area was lower than in the area treated with<br />
glyphosate.<br />
1996.<br />
The perce t green cover in each plot was rated on July 22, August 22, and October 24,<br />
1 Prof. of Ornamen Horticulture and Research Associate, Dept. of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State<br />
University, Universi y Park, PA 16802"<br />
2 Roundup Pro, M nsanto Co., 800 No. lindbergh Boulevard, scLouis, MO 63167.