08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

115<br />

CONTROLL NO ROADSIDE VEOEf ATION WITH THIAZOPYR, OXYFLUORFEN,<br />

OLUFOSINA TE, AND OLYPHOSA TE<br />

Larry J. Kuhns and Tracey L. Harpster!<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

must be controlled under guiderails to allow water to flow uniformly away from<br />

the road surface d to allow their clear visibility to drivers. The objective of this study was to<br />

evaluate the resid al activity of two preemergence herbicides, oxyfluorfen and thiazopyr, in the<br />

roadside enviro ent. They were used in combination with one of two postemergence herbicides,<br />

glufosinate or gly hosate 2 , to eliminate existing weeds in the treated areas.<br />

MEfHODS<br />

The pree ergence treatments evaluated were thiazopyr alone at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 lb/a; the<br />

same treatments p us oxyfluorfen at 1.61b/a; oxyfluorfen alone at 1.6Ib/a; and oryzalin plus<br />

oxyfluorfen at 4 d 1.61b/a, respectively. The postemergence treatments included the addition of<br />

glyphosate at 2 lb to a set of the preemergence treatments, or applications of either glyphosate at 2<br />

lb/a or glufosinat at 2 lb/a 11 days prior to the application of the preemergence treatments. Table 1<br />

includes a summ of the treatments.<br />

Treatmen were applied to 75 ft2 plots with a C02 pressurized test plot sprayer at 30 psi<br />

through two 8004 nozzles mounted in a double swivel nozzle body to eliminate the shadow effect I<br />

around support ts; in 38 OPA. The combination of preemergence herbicides and glyphosate<br />

was applied on Ju e 27,1996. At the same time, the applications of glyphosate or glufosinate<br />

alone were made. On July 8, the preemergence treatments were applied over the areas previously<br />

treated with glyp sate or glufosinate. Treatments were applied in a randomized complete block<br />

design, with thr replications.<br />

The study was conducted along a roadside under guiderails in two areas about 400 yards<br />

apart. Two replic tions of the treatments including glyphosate were in one area, and the other<br />

replication plus al three replications with glufosinate were in the other. The predominant weeds in<br />

the glyphosate ar at the time of application were common ragweed (AmbrosiaartemisiifoliaL.),<br />

birdsfoot trefoil ( tus comiculatusL.), wild carrot (DaucuscarotaL.), and crownvetch (Coronilla<br />

varia L.). Other eeds distributed throughout were wild buckwheat (Polygonumconvolvulus<br />

L.), common spe well (VeronicaofficinalisL.), bull thistle (Cirsiumvulgare(Savi) Tenore.),<br />

common burdock (Arctiumminus (Hill) Bemh.), goldenrod (Solidagospp), green foxtail (Setaria<br />

viridis (L.) Beau .), red fescue (FestucarubraL.), and garlic mustard (Alliariapetiolata (Bieb.)<br />

Cavara & Grand . Ragweed was 6 to 12 inches tall, all others were 3 to 6 inches tall. The<br />

predominant w s in the glufosinate treated area were wild carrot, common ragweed, spotted<br />

knapweed (Centa reamaculosaLam.), birdsfoot trefoil, and yellow foxtail (Setarialutescens<br />

(Weigel) Hubb.). The weed density and size in this area was lower than in the area treated with<br />

glyphosate.<br />

1996.<br />

The perce t green cover in each plot was rated on July 22, August 22, and October 24,<br />

1 Prof. of Ornamen Horticulture and Research Associate, Dept. of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State<br />

University, Universi y Park, PA 16802"<br />

2 Roundup Pro, M nsanto Co., 800 No. lindbergh Boulevard, scLouis, MO 63167.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!