Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 51—1997 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

08.06.2015 Views

112 E FECTS OF REPEATEDLATE-WINTERHERBICIDE APPLICATIONS ON SEMI-DORMANTALFALFA H. Menbere and R. L. Ritter* ABSTRACT Th s study was initiated on a two-year-old stand of 'Legacy' alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) located at the University of Marylan Hayden Farm in Beltsville, MD. Herbicide applications were ma e on March 22, 1995 and March 27, 1996 when the alfalfa had app oximately 2 to 4 inches of growth. Treatments included imazeth pyr (Pursuit) at 0.063 and 0.094 lb ai/Ai paraquat (Gramox ne Extra) at 0.23, 0.313, and 0.469 lb ai/Ai metribuzin (Sencor Lexone) at 0.375 lb ai/Ai terbacil (Sinbar) at 0.375 lb ai/Ai b omoxynil (Buctril) at 0.375 lb ai/Ai and 2,4-DB (Butyrac) at 1.5 lb ai/A. These same treatments were applied to the same plots th years. Visual crop tolerance (phytotoxicity) ratings were ma e in April. Four cuttings were made each year to check for pot ntial yield effects from the herbicide applications. 1995, crop tolerance ratings indicated that the highest f foliar injury occurred from all three rates of t, ranging from 23 (low rate) to 35% (high rate) on April ignificant amount of foliar injury was also observed from metrib zin and terbacil which averaged 18% and 13%, respectively, on Apr'l 5. All of the other treatments averaged less than 10% injury on the April 5 rating. Visual ratings made on April 20 found 11 rates of paraquat and metribuzin still causing a signif'cant amount of crop injury. similar trends occurred in 1996, hereby the highest levels of foliar injury were obtained from a 1 three rates of paraquat, ranging from 32 to 40% on April 11. F liar injury was also observed from metribuzin and terbacil (13 an 15%, respectively). Ratings made on April 26 showed contin ed injury to the alfalfa from these five treatments. All other reatments averaged ratings of 10% or less on both dates. I from a the si no yie August paraqu lowest showed metrib yield 1995, yield data obtained May 6 indicated lower weights falfa treated with the two highest rates of paraquat and gle rate of metribuzin. With the June and July harvests, d differences were observed between treatments. Yet, the harvest found the plots treated with the high rate of t and the single rate of metribuzin were yielding the among all treatments. In 1996, first cutting yield data a decrease in yield where the high rate of gramoxone or zin were applied. Subsequent cuttings showed a decline in here terbacil had been used. T ese data indicate that repeated late-winter herbicide applic tions on semi-dormant alfalfa may not result in a loss in alfalf yield over time. *Agric Res. Tech. and Assoc. Prof., Agric. Exp. Stn., Agron. Dept., Univ. of MD, College Park, MD 20742.

113 Fall V rsus Early SummerApplicationsfor Controlof Hemp Dogbanein Corn W. S. Curran, E. L. Werner, and P. H. Craig) ABSTRACT Hempdogbane( pocynumcannabinumL.) is an herbaceouscreepingperennialthat is nativeto NorthAmerica. t is foundthroughoutCanada.the UnitedStates,andespeciallythe mid-Atlantic region. Hempd gbaneis a seriousproblemweedin bothcultivatedand noncultivatedfieldsin many parts of Pe sylvania. Althoughcrop reductiondue to hempdogbanevaries,someresearch from Nebraska s owed a 15%reductionin com, 32% loss in sorghum,and 37% loss in soybean grainyield from controlledinfestations. In conventionaltillagesystems.hempdogbaneis rarely a seriousweed p oblem. However,with the increasein conservationtillagesystemsandlack of effectiveselecti herbicides,hempdogbanehasquicklybecomea seriousproblem. In the fall of I , 1994,and 1995,experimentswereestablishedin DauphinCounty. Pennsylvaniato omparefall applicationof one or moresystemicherbicidesto postemergence applicationsin c rn. Previousto the fall treatments,the hempdogbanewas allowedto regrow followingeither heat harvest in early July or in a fallowfield. All fieldlocationshad a historyof no-tillage. Fall bicidetreatmentsin 1993and 1994includedglyphosateat I and 21b ailA, dicambaat 0.5 d l lb aeIA, dicambaplus 2,4-DLVE at 0.5 lb aeIA each, andglyphosateplus 2,4-DLVBor di ba at l lb plus 0.5 IblA. Herbicideswereappliedat two applicationtimings eitherin early S temberor in early October. In 1995,only a singletimingof glyphosatewas appliedin late ptember, Corn was plantedno-till the followingspring. Both years,a bumdown herbicideplus a oil residualgrass plus broadleafprogramwas appliedprior to corn planting. Postemergence rbicidetreatmentsin corn includeddicambaor 2,4-Damineat 0.51blAand primisulfuronpl s dicamba at 0.0181bai plus0.251b/A. Onlydicambaplus primisulfuronwas comparedin the 995 experiment Allherbicidetreatmentsincludeda nonionicsurfactantat 0.25% v/v in the spray ixture. In addition.the 1995experimentcomparedthe performanceof the herbicidetreatm nts in no-tilland minimum-till(springchiselplow)corn. Weed control evaluationsincl ded visualestimatesof percentcontrol(0 to 100scale),weeddensity,and weed biomass. The hempdogb e infestationwas severethroughoutmost of the corn in 1994and 1996and more variablein 1995 The treatmentsthat includedfall appliedglyphosatewereclearlyvisiblein early summershowin good control (>85%)of hempdogbaneand severalother perennialweeds presentin the fi d. However.the emergenceof newshootsin sometreatmentsthroughoutthe summerredu the performanceratingsby August The additionof dicambaor 2,4-Dto glyphosatedid n t improveoverallperformanceon hempdogbanein 1994or 1995.although including2,4-D id improvethe controlof dandelion. In general,dicambaand 2,4-Dperformance was lesseffecti thanglyphosateand increasingglyphosateratedid not improvecontrol The Septemberand tober timingsproducedsimilarresults,althoughthe Septembertimingmayhave had a slightadv tage in 1994becauseof cold weatherand a lightfrostjust priorto the October I application. In eneral,the post applicationsin com wereequalor lesseffectivethanthe fall applications.In 996, althoughcontrolwith primisulfuronplus dicambawas equalto fall applied I glyphosate(>85 control),root bud growthwas observedon the post corn treatedhempdogbane. Tillagedid not i uencethe levelof controlin 1996,althoughmorehempdogbaneshootswere I observedin som chiseltreatmentsin the mid-summer evaluation. The fall treatmentfollowedby an additionalpo t corn treatmentprovidedsome of the bestcontrol(> 90%)of hempdogbaneand shouldallowfo better controlof a numberof perennialweeds. ) Assoc. Prof. red Sci., Res. Tech., Dept. of Agron., and Ext. Agent. DauphinCo., The PennsylvaniaS te University,UniversityPark. PA 16802.

113<br />

Fall V rsus Early SummerApplicationsfor Controlof Hemp Dogbanein Corn<br />

W. S. Curran, E. L. Werner, and P. H. Craig)<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Hempdogbane( pocynumcannabinumL.) is an herbaceouscreepingperennialthat is nativeto<br />

NorthAmerica. t is foundthroughoutCanada.the UnitedStates,andespeciallythe mid-Atlantic<br />

region. Hempd gbaneis a seriousproblemweedin bothcultivatedand noncultivatedfieldsin<br />

many parts of Pe sylvania. Althoughcrop reductiondue to hempdogbanevaries,someresearch<br />

from Nebraska s owed a 15%reductionin com, 32% loss in sorghum,and 37% loss in soybean<br />

grainyield from controlledinfestations. In conventionaltillagesystems.hempdogbaneis rarely<br />

a seriousweed p oblem. However,with the increasein conservationtillagesystemsandlack of<br />

effectiveselecti herbicides,hempdogbanehasquicklybecomea seriousproblem.<br />

In the fall of I , 1994,and 1995,experimentswereestablishedin DauphinCounty.<br />

Pennsylvaniato omparefall applicationof one or moresystemicherbicidesto postemergence<br />

applicationsin c rn. Previousto the fall treatments,the hempdogbanewas allowedto regrow<br />

followingeither heat harvest in early July or in a fallowfield. All fieldlocationshad a historyof<br />

no-tillage. Fall bicidetreatmentsin 1993and 1994includedglyphosateat I and 21b ailA,<br />

dicambaat 0.5 d l lb aeIA, dicambaplus 2,4-DLVE at 0.5 lb aeIA each, andglyphosateplus<br />

2,4-DLVBor di ba at l lb plus 0.5 IblA. Herbicideswereappliedat two applicationtimings<br />

eitherin early S temberor in early October. In 1995,only a singletimingof glyphosatewas<br />

appliedin late ptember, Corn was plantedno-till the followingspring. Both years,a bumdown<br />

herbicideplus a oil residualgrass plus broadleafprogramwas appliedprior to corn planting.<br />

Postemergence rbicidetreatmentsin corn includeddicambaor 2,4-Damineat 0.51blAand<br />

primisulfuronpl s dicamba at 0.0181bai plus0.251b/A. Onlydicambaplus primisulfuronwas<br />

comparedin the 995 experiment Allherbicidetreatmentsincludeda nonionicsurfactantat 0.25%<br />

v/v in the spray ixture. In addition.the 1995experimentcomparedthe performanceof the<br />

herbicidetreatm nts in no-tilland minimum-till(springchiselplow)corn. <strong>Weed</strong> control<br />

evaluationsincl ded visualestimatesof percentcontrol(0 to 100scale),weeddensity,and weed<br />

biomass.<br />

The hempdogb e infestationwas severethroughoutmost of the corn in 1994and 1996and more<br />

variablein 1995 The treatmentsthat includedfall appliedglyphosatewereclearlyvisiblein early<br />

summershowin good control (>85%)of hempdogbaneand severalother perennialweeds<br />

presentin the fi d. However.the emergenceof newshootsin sometreatmentsthroughoutthe<br />

summerredu the performanceratingsby August The additionof dicambaor 2,4-Dto<br />

glyphosatedid n t improveoverallperformanceon hempdogbanein 1994or 1995.although<br />

including2,4-D id improvethe controlof dandelion. In general,dicambaand 2,4-Dperformance<br />

was lesseffecti thanglyphosateand increasingglyphosateratedid not improvecontrol The<br />

Septemberand tober timingsproducedsimilarresults,althoughthe Septembertimingmayhave<br />

had a slightadv tage in 1994becauseof cold weatherand a lightfrostjust priorto the October I<br />

application. In eneral,the post applicationsin com wereequalor lesseffectivethanthe fall<br />

applications.In 996, althoughcontrolwith primisulfuronplus dicambawas equalto fall applied I<br />

glyphosate(>85 control),root bud growthwas observedon the post corn treatedhempdogbane.<br />

Tillagedid not i uencethe levelof controlin 1996,althoughmorehempdogbaneshootswere I<br />

observedin som chiseltreatmentsin the mid-summer evaluation. The fall treatmentfollowedby<br />

an additionalpo t corn treatmentprovidedsome of the bestcontrol(> 90%)of hempdogbaneand<br />

shouldallowfo better controlof a numberof perennialweeds.<br />

) Assoc. Prof. red Sci., Res. Tech., Dept. of Agron., and Ext. Agent. DauphinCo., The<br />

PennsylvaniaS te University,UniversityPark. PA 16802.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!