Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
HERBICIDE EVALVA nONS IN CHRISlMAS TREE PLANTINGS OF FIR (ABIES spp.) J. F. Ahrens and T. L. Mervosh' ABSTRACT The needforherbicidealternativesforChristmastrees led us to evaluateseveral herbicides during 1998 and 1999, with emphasis on fir tolerance before and during active growth in the spring. Accordingly,repeatedexperimentswereconductedat The Connecticut AgriculturalExperimentStationin Windsor,CT andwith cooperatinggrowersin Somers,CT andWoodbury,VT. Soil typeswere sandyloamsor silt loarns. Herbicidesprayswere applied with a Co,-pressurized backpack sprayer in 20 gallA over the top of or on the lower two-thirds of thetrees. Herbicidesevaluatedin one ormoreexperimentsincludedatrazine90DF plus simazine 90DF, hexazinone 75DF, thiazopyr 2L, azafeniden 80DF and the sulfonylurea herbicides thifensulfuron-methyI25DF, chlorimuron-ethyI25DG, sulfometuron-methyl 7500, prosulfuron 57WDG, and MaN 37503 75WDG. Rates are listed in oz a.i.lA or Ib a.i.lA. Hexazinone at 0.5, 1.0, or I.51b1A and sulfometuron-methyl at 0.375 and 0.75 ovA applied 2 weeks before planting fraserfir (Ables fraserty caused no injury. However, hexazinone at 1.0 and 1.5 lblA applied to establisbed fraser fir before bud break caused slight to muderate necrosis. Sulfometuron-methyl at 0.1875 to 0.375 ovA did not injure dormant fraser fir and caused only slight, tolerable chlorosis on fraser fir during active growth. Thifensulfuron-methyl at 0.25 or 0.5 ovA plus 0.25% X-77, and chlorimuron-ethyl at 0.125 or 0.25 ovA plus 0.25% X 77 causedno injuryto dormantfraserfirandslight,tolerable chlorosisin Juneon actively growing fraser fir. Prosulfuron at 0.1425 or 0.285 ovA plus 0.25% X-77 applied during active growthof fraserfirinearlyandmidJunein VT causedmoderateto severe chlorosison sprayed foliage. However, sprays of prosulfuron in CT at 0.285 or 0.57 ovA without surfactant resulted in only slight chlorosis on fraser fir before or after bud break. MON 37503 at 0.5 or 1.0 ovA applied before bud break did not injure newly planted Canaan fir (Ables halsamea VaT. phoneTolepsis) in CT nor established fraserfir in VT. Thiazopyr at 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 IblA before bud break did not affect established Canaan fir in VT but injured newly planted Canaan fir in CT. Thiazopyr applied just before or at bud break at 0.5 or 1.0 IblA did not injure balsam fir (Abies balsamea) or fraser fir in CT following two applications in two years. Azafeniden applied at O.5lblA during active growth caused more injury to fraserfir than did 1.5lblA applied before bud break. During active growth, injury to fraserfir from azafeniden at O.5Ib1A was similar to injury from atrazine (21b1A) plus simazine (2Ib/A). Neither treatment injured fraser fir before bud break. New growth of balsam fir also was sensitive to azafeniden, whereas newly planted or established Canaan fir tolerated up to 1.5 lb/A before bud break. At 0.5 lblA, azafeniden gave excellent preemergence and postemergence controlof large crabgrass(Digitaria sanguinalis). Herbicideswith postemergenceactivity clearlywere saferto coniferswhenappliedto dormantfoliage thanwhenappliedto new needle growth. rweed ScientistEmeritusandAssistantScientist,TheConnecticutAgriculturalExperiment Station, Valley Laboratory, Windsor, CT 06095. 88
POTENTIAL WEEDINESS OF SEVERAL NEW HERBACEOUS PERENNIAL CROPS Annamarie Pennucci I ABSTRACT A brief review of new herbaceous perennial crops indicates that several have already demonstrated the potential for intra- and inter-nursery spread. A list of potential nursery crops that may act as invasive weeds follows. An analysis of morphological factors that predispose these crops to act as weeds and a description of potential factors to consider prior to crop release is suggested. INTRODUCTION During the past two seasons, several New Hampshire nurseries and farm stands reported the unexpected spread of novel crop plants into pots and containers of both woody and herbaceous plant materials. Such unwelcome movement within the nursery compromised plant identity. plant health and the economic requirement for weed free status, Consequently, questions arose concerning the necessity of crop cleanliness, recognition and hand removal of one of the crop plants, using herbicides to prevent further ingress, and separation or containment to prevent further spread of seemingly desirable species. Several of these plants are newly developed or selected for the herbaceous perennial trade and while some are closely related to or cultivars of existing crop or weed species, others are new genera whose potentials as crop or weed remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two nurseries located in southern New Hampshire first reported the appearance of unusual plants in purchased containers as early as 1997. Both nurseries obtained plant materials from several of the same mid-western plug propagators and from the same two in-state perennial plant wholesalers. Both nurseries were surveyed monthly in 1998 and 1999 for unusual weeds and those weeds were identified according to both standard references and new crop catalogues. Movement of these novel crops/weeds (cw) within the nursery was measured in linear feet from the original source plants to other plants held in stock areas, in feet and in acres from stock to sales tables and in total acres across the nursery. Morphological traits that might account for movement were determined and the number of pots within each crop species infested with cw was counted monthly. Herbaceous perennial crop plants were categorized by the amount of soil visible at maturity and the relative strength of the crop and the number of crop plant units invaded in each category was determined. Industry standard herbicides were used at label rate in each of these nurseries. Typically, Dacthal (DCPA [dimethyl 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-I,4-benzenedicarboxylate]) was applied as the crop resumed spring growth at preemergence and 10 weeks later as a postemergent drench; Preen (pendimethalin [N-(I-ethylpropyl) -3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzeneamine] applied preemergent and 8 weeks later as a postemergent drench; Gallery (isoxaben [N-[3-(I-ethyl-I-methylpropyl)-S-isoxazolyl] -2,6-dimeth- oxybenzamide] applied preemergent and Scotts OH-2 (pendimethalin + oxyfluorfen [2-chloro-I-(3-ethoxy-4- nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene] applied pre/post as crop growth resumed. Herbicidal efficacy on cw was determined 6 and 16 weeks after finaltreatment. I Northeast Turf andOrnamental Research. Raymond, N.H. 03077 89
- Page 37 and 38: GLYPHOSATE ALONE AND PRECEDED BY PR
- Page 39 and 40: ROUNDUPVS. LIBERTY:WHATHAVE WE LEAR
- Page 41 and 42: In summary, application timing for
- Page 43 and 44: INFLUENCE OF TIMING ON WEED MANAGEM
- Page 45 and 46: IMPACT OF GLYPHOSATE TIMING AND COR
- Page 47 and 48: PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES INFLUENCE W
- Page 49 and 50: COMPARISON OF WEED CONTROL SYSTEMS
- Page 51 and 52: Table I Mean Percent Weed Control V
- Page 53 and 54: SMALL GRAIN WEED CONTROL - NEW WEED
- Page 55 and 56: MODE OF ACTION, ABSORPTION, TRANSLO
- Page 57 and 58: INFLUENCE OF CROWNVETCH WITH AND WI
- Page 59 and 60: lRUMPETCREEPER, HONEYVINEMILKWEED,A
- Page 61 and 62: FLUFENACET PLUS METRIBUZIN PLUS ATR
- Page 63 and 64: CONTROLLING ASTERACEAE WEEDS WITH R
- Page 65 and 66: 0... Figure1. GerminationRateof Roo
- Page 67 and 68: BIOLOGICALLY BASED WEED CONTROL STR
- Page 69 and 70: NON·NATIVE VASCULAR FLORA OF BISCA
- Page 71 and 72: principally in ruderal sites. lawns
- Page 73 and 74: EVALUATION OF AZAFENlDIN FOR PREEME
- Page 75 and 76: AUTOMATING MONITORING OF ROADSIDE W
- Page 77 and 78: Table I: Swnmary of brush managemen
- Page 79 and 80: Table I: Sequence codes and general
- Page 81 and 82: IR-4 ORNAMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRESS F
- Page 83 and 84: personnel with many of the illegal
- Page 85 and 86: TOLERANCE OF ORNAMENTAL GROUNDCOVER
- Page 87: MUGWORT CONTROL WITH CLOPYRALID AND
- Page 91 and 92: Table I: Identification, morphologi
- Page 93 and 94: Trifolium tricolor 232 26 62 0 18 S
- Page 95 and 96: NUTRIENT REMOVAL BY WEEDS IN CONTAI
- Page 97 and 98: CONTROL OF POAANNUA FROM MULTIPLE S
- Page 99 and 100: ANNUAL BLUEGRASS (PDaannual CONTROL
- Page 101 and 102: LATERAL DEVELOPMENT OF PLANT oaowra
- Page 103 and 104: RE-ROOTING OF FOUR VARIETIES OF CRE
- Page 105 and 106: Table 2. Top growth weights (fresh)
- Page 107 and 108: CONTROL OF DALLISGRASS IN COOL SEAS
- Page 109 and 110: Kentucky bluegrass was rated to hav
- Page 111 and 112: Table 2. Fresh weight (grams) barve
- Page 113 and 114: MANAGING FENOXAPROP RESIST ANT CRAB
- Page 115 and 116: ADVANCED FORMULATION TECHNOLOGY FOR
- Page 117 and 118: Table I. Preemergence smooth crabgr
- Page 119 and 120: 0.57EW at O.l21bs ai/A plus Confron
- Page 121 and 122: EFFICACY OF DITHIOPYR FORMULATIONS
- Page 123 and 124: EFFECTS OF DROUGHT ON THE INTERFERE
- Page 125 and 126: WEED MANAGEMENT WITH HALOSULFURON I
- Page 127 and 128: WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN WITH CAR
- Page 129 and 130: COMPARISON OF USING LEAF AREA AND W
- Page 131 and 132: RESULTS OF NEW YORK VINEYARD TRIALS
- Page 133 and 134: HERBICIDE TOLERANCE IN CRANBERRIES
- Page 135 and 136: Classification based on action on a
- Page 137 and 138: EFFECTS OF SEVERAL POTENTIALLY USEF
HERBICIDE EVALVA nONS IN CHRISlMAS TREE PLANTINGS OF FIR (ABIES spp.)<br />
J. F. Ahrens and T. L. Mervosh'<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The needforherbicidealternativesforChristmastrees led us to evaluateseveral<br />
herbicides during 1998 and 1999, with emphasis on fir tolerance before and during active growth<br />
in the spring. Accordingly,repeatedexperimentswereconductedat The Connecticut<br />
AgriculturalExperimentStationin Windsor,CT andwith cooperatinggrowersin Somers,CT<br />
andWoodbury,VT. Soil typeswere sandyloamsor silt loarns. Herbicidesprayswere applied<br />
with a Co,-pressurized backpack sprayer in 20 gallA over the top of or on the lower two-thirds<br />
of thetrees. Herbicidesevaluatedin one ormoreexperimentsincludedatrazine90DF plus<br />
simazine 90DF, hexazinone 75DF, thiazopyr 2L, azafeniden 80DF and the sulfonylurea<br />
herbicides thifensulfuron-methyI25DF, chlorimuron-ethyI25DG, sulfometuron-methyl 7500,<br />
prosulfuron 57WDG, and MaN 37503 75WDG. Rates are listed in oz a.i.lA or Ib a.i.lA.<br />
Hexazinone at 0.5, 1.0, or I.51b1A and sulfometuron-methyl at 0.375 and 0.75 ovA<br />
applied 2 weeks before planting fraserfir (Ables fraserty caused no injury. However, hexazinone<br />
at 1.0 and 1.5 lblA applied to establisbed fraser fir before bud break caused slight to muderate<br />
necrosis. Sulfometuron-methyl at 0.1875 to 0.375 ovA did not injure dormant fraser fir and<br />
caused only slight, tolerable chlorosis on fraser fir during active growth. Thifensulfuron-methyl<br />
at 0.25 or 0.5 ovA plus 0.25% X-77, and chlorimuron-ethyl at 0.125 or 0.25 ovA plus 0.25% X<br />
77 causedno injuryto dormantfraserfirandslight,tolerable chlorosisin Juneon actively<br />
growing fraser fir. Prosulfuron at 0.1425 or 0.285 ovA plus 0.25% X-77 applied during active<br />
growthof fraserfirinearlyandmidJunein VT causedmoderateto severe chlorosison sprayed<br />
foliage. However, sprays of prosulfuron in CT at 0.285 or 0.57 ovA without surfactant resulted<br />
in only slight chlorosis on fraser fir before or after bud break.<br />
MON 37503 at 0.5 or 1.0 ovA applied before bud break did not injure newly planted<br />
Canaan fir (Ables halsamea VaT. phoneTolepsis) in CT nor established fraserfir in VT.<br />
Thiazopyr at 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 IblA before bud break did not affect established Canaan fir in VT<br />
but injured newly planted Canaan fir in CT. Thiazopyr applied just before or at bud break at 0.5<br />
or 1.0 IblA did not injure balsam fir (Abies balsamea) or fraser fir in CT following two<br />
applications in two years. Azafeniden applied at O.5lblA during active growth caused more<br />
injury to fraserfir than did 1.5lblA applied before bud break. During active growth, injury to<br />
fraserfir from azafeniden at O.5Ib1A was similar to injury from atrazine (21b1A) plus simazine<br />
(2Ib/A). Neither treatment injured fraser fir before bud break. New growth of balsam fir also<br />
was sensitive to azafeniden, whereas newly planted or established Canaan fir tolerated up to 1.5<br />
lb/A before bud break. At 0.5 lblA, azafeniden gave excellent preemergence and postemergence<br />
controlof large crabgrass(Digitaria sanguinalis). Herbicideswith postemergenceactivity<br />
clearlywere saferto coniferswhenappliedto dormantfoliage thanwhenappliedto new needle<br />
growth.<br />
rweed ScientistEmeritusandAssistantScientist,TheConnecticutAgriculturalExperiment<br />
Station, Valley Laboratory, Windsor, CT 06095.<br />
88