Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
TABLEI: Greencoverratingsof weed specieslocatedundera guiderailnearNazareth,PA. Treatments were applied May 6, 1999. Green cover ratings were taken 7, 35, 62, 91, 119, and 161 DAT. Each value is the mean of three replications. Appbcation ureen Coverof WeedSpecies Treatment" Rate 7DAT 35DAT 62DAT 91 DAT 119DAT 161 DAT (oYae) (- ----_. - - .- ---%---------- --------- ------) Untreated Check 42 50 35 28 60 65 azafenidin 3.2 33 4 3 3 6 19 azafenidin 4.8 55 4 6 6 9 21 azafenidin 6.4 33 5 3 4 6 12 azafenidin 8.0 32 3 3 3 4 10 sulfometuronmethyl 2.25 32 1 2 7 16 21 azafenidin 3.2 30 1 1 1 1 3 sulfometuron methyl 2.25 azafenidin 4.8 38 I I 1 1 2 sulfometuron methyl 2.25 azafenidin 6.4 37 2 1 I 2 3 sulfometuronmethyl 2.25 azafenidin 8.0 42 2 1 1 1 4 sulfometuronmethyl 2.25 sulfometuron methyl 2.25 33 1 I 1 1 2 diuron 102 diuron 102 50 7 6 4 10 19 azafenidin 3.2 37 6 6 7 12 25 diuron 102 azafenidin 4.8 40 4 7 7 13 38 diuron 102 azafenidin 6.4 40 1 1 1 6 17 diuron 102 azafenidin 8.0 40 2 2 1 6 14 diuron 102 imazapyr 12.4 37 2 1 I I 3 diuron 100 SlgmficanceLevel(P) 0.4382 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 LSD (p=O.05) n.s. 6 6 7 14 19 IIAll treatmentsexcepttheuntreatedcheckcoutainedglyphosate(Monsantocompany)@24 oz eeac. 74
AUTOMATING MONITORING OF ROADSIDE WEEDS N.P. Cam', K. McKague\ L. Kingston', and S. Struger' ABSTRACT An integrated system was evaluated for monitoring of roadside weed locations and related features, incorporating global positioning systems (GPS) for locating the sites in the field and geographic information systems (GIS) for storing, managing, manipulating and displaying the data. Weed areas, desirable vegetation, water features, culverts and sensitive adjacent land use were recorded. Methods of recording various roadside features as polygon, linear or point data were explored. Two systems of collecting the information were compared - a polygon, fieldbased collection system and a linear, vehicle-based collection system. Data collected can be used for planning of roadside vegetation management operations, contract management, quality control, and for communication of vegetation features to staff involved in planning, design and construction. 'Cain Vegetation Inc., 5 Kingham Road, Acton, ON L7J 1S3 'Ecologistics Limited, 490 Dutton Drive, Suite A-I, Waterloo, ON N2L 6H7; current address: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 1 Stone Road W., 3rd Floor, Guelph, ON, NIG4Y2 'Roadside Vegetation Management Section and Geomatics Office, respectively; Ontario Ministry of Transportation, 301 St. Paul Street, St.Catharines, ON, L2R 7R4 75
- Page 23 and 24: exceeded 4. The success of training
- Page 25 and 26: _u ____ Table2: Estimatesof herbace
- Page 27 and 28: DOUBLE CROP CORN WEED CONTROL IN VI
- Page 29 and 30: ANNUAL WEED AND GRASS CONTROL IN CO
- Page 31 and 32: MANAGING QUACKGRASSINFESTATIONSAS C
- Page 33 and 34: USING HERBICIDE RESISTANT HYBRIDS T
- Page 35 and 36: NICOSULFURONIRIMSULFURON COMBINATIO
- Page 37 and 38: GLYPHOSATE ALONE AND PRECEDED BY PR
- Page 39 and 40: ROUNDUPVS. LIBERTY:WHATHAVE WE LEAR
- Page 41 and 42: In summary, application timing for
- Page 43 and 44: INFLUENCE OF TIMING ON WEED MANAGEM
- Page 45 and 46: IMPACT OF GLYPHOSATE TIMING AND COR
- Page 47 and 48: PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES INFLUENCE W
- Page 49 and 50: COMPARISON OF WEED CONTROL SYSTEMS
- Page 51 and 52: Table I Mean Percent Weed Control V
- Page 53 and 54: SMALL GRAIN WEED CONTROL - NEW WEED
- Page 55 and 56: MODE OF ACTION, ABSORPTION, TRANSLO
- Page 57 and 58: INFLUENCE OF CROWNVETCH WITH AND WI
- Page 59 and 60: lRUMPETCREEPER, HONEYVINEMILKWEED,A
- Page 61 and 62: FLUFENACET PLUS METRIBUZIN PLUS ATR
- Page 63 and 64: CONTROLLING ASTERACEAE WEEDS WITH R
- Page 65 and 66: 0... Figure1. GerminationRateof Roo
- Page 67 and 68: BIOLOGICALLY BASED WEED CONTROL STR
- Page 69 and 70: NON·NATIVE VASCULAR FLORA OF BISCA
- Page 71 and 72: principally in ruderal sites. lawns
- Page 73: EVALUATION OF AZAFENlDIN FOR PREEME
- Page 77 and 78: Table I: Swnmary of brush managemen
- Page 79 and 80: Table I: Sequence codes and general
- Page 81 and 82: IR-4 ORNAMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRESS F
- Page 83 and 84: personnel with many of the illegal
- Page 85 and 86: TOLERANCE OF ORNAMENTAL GROUNDCOVER
- Page 87 and 88: MUGWORT CONTROL WITH CLOPYRALID AND
- Page 89 and 90: POTENTIAL WEEDINESS OF SEVERAL NEW
- Page 91 and 92: Table I: Identification, morphologi
- Page 93 and 94: Trifolium tricolor 232 26 62 0 18 S
- Page 95 and 96: NUTRIENT REMOVAL BY WEEDS IN CONTAI
- Page 97 and 98: CONTROL OF POAANNUA FROM MULTIPLE S
- Page 99 and 100: ANNUAL BLUEGRASS (PDaannual CONTROL
- Page 101 and 102: LATERAL DEVELOPMENT OF PLANT oaowra
- Page 103 and 104: RE-ROOTING OF FOUR VARIETIES OF CRE
- Page 105 and 106: Table 2. Top growth weights (fresh)
- Page 107 and 108: CONTROL OF DALLISGRASS IN COOL SEAS
- Page 109 and 110: Kentucky bluegrass was rated to hav
- Page 111 and 112: Table 2. Fresh weight (grams) barve
- Page 113 and 114: MANAGING FENOXAPROP RESIST ANT CRAB
- Page 115 and 116: ADVANCED FORMULATION TECHNOLOGY FOR
- Page 117 and 118: Table I. Preemergence smooth crabgr
- Page 119 and 120: 0.57EW at O.l21bs ai/A plus Confron
- Page 121 and 122: EFFICACY OF DITHIOPYR FORMULATIONS
- Page 123 and 124: EFFECTS OF DROUGHT ON THE INTERFERE
TABLEI: Greencoverratingsof weed specieslocatedundera guiderailnearNazareth,PA.<br />
Treatments were applied May 6, 1999. Green cover ratings were taken 7, 35, 62, 91, 119, and<br />
161 DAT. Each value is the mean of three replications.<br />
Appbcation<br />
ureen<br />
Coverof <strong>Weed</strong>Species<br />
Treatment" Rate 7DAT 35DAT 62DAT 91 DAT 119DAT 161 DAT<br />
(oYae) (- ----_. - - .- ---%---------- --------- ------)<br />
Untreated Check 42 50 35 28 60 65<br />
azafenidin 3.2 33 4 3 3 6 19<br />
azafenidin 4.8 55 4 6 6 9 21<br />
azafenidin 6.4 33 5 3 4 6 12<br />
azafenidin 8.0 32 3 3 3 4 10<br />
sulfometuronmethyl 2.25 32 1 2 7 16 21<br />
azafenidin 3.2 30 1 1 1 1 3<br />
sulfometuron methyl 2.25<br />
azafenidin 4.8 38 I I 1 1 2<br />
sulfometuron methyl 2.25<br />
azafenidin 6.4 37 2 1 I 2 3<br />
sulfometuronmethyl 2.25<br />
azafenidin 8.0 42 2 1 1 1 4<br />
sulfometuronmethyl 2.25<br />
sulfometuron methyl 2.25 33 1 I 1 1 2<br />
diuron 102<br />
diuron 102 50 7 6 4 10 19<br />
azafenidin 3.2 37 6 6 7 12 25<br />
diuron 102<br />
azafenidin 4.8 40 4 7 7 13 38<br />
diuron 102<br />
azafenidin 6.4 40 1 1 1 6 17<br />
diuron 102<br />
azafenidin 8.0 40 2 2 1 6 14<br />
diuron 102<br />
imazapyr 12.4 37 2 1 I I 3<br />
diuron 100<br />
SlgmficanceLevel(P) 0.4382 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001<br />
LSD (p=O.05) n.s. 6 6 7 14 19<br />
IIAll treatmentsexcepttheuntreatedcheckcoutainedglyphosate(Monsantocompany)@24 oz eeac.<br />
74
Change language