- Page 1 and 2: WEED REMOVAL TIMING WITH ROUNDUP RE
- Page 3 and 4: EFFECT OF HERBICIDE RATES AND IRRIG
- Page 5: 40 Effect of Pronone Applied with A
- Page 9 and 10: N 1175 feet Roundup Ready Studies R
- Page 11 and 12: VIRGINIA TECH'S ONLINE WEED IDENTIF
- Page 13 and 14: WEED CONTROL AND YIELD OF CUT FLOWE
- Page 15 and 16: Table I. Effect of napropamide and
- Page 17 and 18: The Effect of Total Postemergence H
- Page 19 and 20: with commercial fertilizer. In gene
- Page 21 and 22: HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS VERSUS HANDW
- Page 23 and 24: exceeded 4. The success of training
- Page 25 and 26: _u ____ Table2: Estimatesof herbace
- Page 27 and 28: DOUBLE CROP CORN WEED CONTROL IN VI
- Page 29 and 30: ANNUAL WEED AND GRASS CONTROL IN CO
- Page 31 and 32: MANAGING QUACKGRASSINFESTATIONSAS C
- Page 33 and 34: USING HERBICIDE RESISTANT HYBRIDS T
- Page 35 and 36: NICOSULFURONIRIMSULFURON COMBINATIO
- Page 37 and 38: GLYPHOSATE ALONE AND PRECEDED BY PR
- Page 39 and 40: ROUNDUPVS. LIBERTY:WHATHAVE WE LEAR
- Page 41 and 42: In summary, application timing for
- Page 43 and 44: INFLUENCE OF TIMING ON WEED MANAGEM
- Page 45 and 46: IMPACT OF GLYPHOSATE TIMING AND COR
- Page 47 and 48: PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES INFLUENCE W
- Page 49 and 50: COMPARISON OF WEED CONTROL SYSTEMS
- Page 51 and 52: Table I Mean Percent Weed Control V
- Page 53 and 54: SMALL GRAIN WEED CONTROL - NEW WEED
- Page 55 and 56: MODE OF ACTION, ABSORPTION, TRANSLO
- Page 57 and 58:
INFLUENCE OF CROWNVETCH WITH AND WI
- Page 59 and 60:
lRUMPETCREEPER, HONEYVINEMILKWEED,A
- Page 61 and 62:
FLUFENACET PLUS METRIBUZIN PLUS ATR
- Page 63 and 64:
CONTROLLING ASTERACEAE WEEDS WITH R
- Page 65 and 66:
0... Figure1. GerminationRateof Roo
- Page 67 and 68:
BIOLOGICALLY BASED WEED CONTROL STR
- Page 69 and 70:
NON·NATIVE VASCULAR FLORA OF BISCA
- Page 71 and 72:
principally in ruderal sites. lawns
- Page 73 and 74:
EVALUATION OF AZAFENlDIN FOR PREEME
- Page 75 and 76:
AUTOMATING MONITORING OF ROADSIDE W
- Page 77 and 78:
Table I: Swnmary of brush managemen
- Page 79 and 80:
Table I: Sequence codes and general
- Page 81 and 82:
IR-4 ORNAMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRESS F
- Page 83 and 84:
personnel with many of the illegal
- Page 85 and 86:
TOLERANCE OF ORNAMENTAL GROUNDCOVER
- Page 87 and 88:
MUGWORT CONTROL WITH CLOPYRALID AND
- Page 89 and 90:
POTENTIAL WEEDINESS OF SEVERAL NEW
- Page 91 and 92:
Table I: Identification, morphologi
- Page 93 and 94:
Trifolium tricolor 232 26 62 0 18 S
- Page 95 and 96:
NUTRIENT REMOVAL BY WEEDS IN CONTAI
- Page 97 and 98:
CONTROL OF POAANNUA FROM MULTIPLE S
- Page 99 and 100:
ANNUAL BLUEGRASS (PDaannual CONTROL
- Page 101 and 102:
LATERAL DEVELOPMENT OF PLANT oaowra
- Page 103 and 104:
RE-ROOTING OF FOUR VARIETIES OF CRE
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 2. Top growth weights (fresh)
- Page 107 and 108:
CONTROL OF DALLISGRASS IN COOL SEAS
- Page 109 and 110:
Kentucky bluegrass was rated to hav
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 2. Fresh weight (grams) barve
- Page 113 and 114:
MANAGING FENOXAPROP RESIST ANT CRAB
- Page 115 and 116:
ADVANCED FORMULATION TECHNOLOGY FOR
- Page 117 and 118:
Table I. Preemergence smooth crabgr
- Page 119 and 120:
0.57EW at O.l21bs ai/A plus Confron
- Page 121 and 122:
EFFICACY OF DITHIOPYR FORMULATIONS
- Page 123 and 124:
EFFECTS OF DROUGHT ON THE INTERFERE
- Page 125 and 126:
WEED MANAGEMENT WITH HALOSULFURON I
- Page 127 and 128:
WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN WITH CAR
- Page 129 and 130:
COMPARISON OF USING LEAF AREA AND W
- Page 131 and 132:
RESULTS OF NEW YORK VINEYARD TRIALS
- Page 133 and 134:
HERBICIDE TOLERANCE IN CRANBERRIES
- Page 135 and 136:
Classification based on action on a
- Page 137 and 138:
EFFECTS OF SEVERAL POTENTIALLY USEF
- Page 139 and 140:
Supplement of the 53 rd Annual Meet
- Page 141 and 142:
with society activities to anyone.
- Page 143 and 144:
WINTER SQUASH CULTIVARS DIFFER IN R
- Page 145 and 146:
INCORPORATING QUINCLORAC IN AUTUMN
- Page 147 and 148:
Control efforts aim to eradicate bo
- Page 149 and 150:
Table I Weed canopy, insect and dis
- Page 151 and 152:
Table 1: Percent mortality of respr