08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMPARISON OF WEED CONTROL SYSTEMS WITII HERBICIDE RESISTANT CORN<br />

Q.R. Johnson, MJ. VanGessel, and S.K. Rick'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

CropProtectioncompaniesarenow promotingweed controlsystemsthatarebuiltaround<br />

herbicideresistantcom (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Sincethesetechnologiesarerelativelynew, little<br />

is knownabouthow these systemscomparein termsof efficacy,yield, andrelativecost.<br />

In 1999 a field experiment was established at the University of Delaware's Research and<br />

Education Center to evaluate weed control systems that are being promoted by DuPont,<br />

Monsanto, AgrEvo, and Cyanamid. For each company a preemergence (PRE) followed by midpostemergence<br />

(MPOST) system (pRE fb POST) and a total early-postemergence (EPOST)<br />

system were evaluated. Additionally,forMonsantoandAgrEvototalMPOSTsystemswere<br />

included. The DuPont systems utilized a conventional com hybrid (Pioneer 3394, IIOcrm);<br />

Monsanto systems utilized a glyphosate-resistant com hybrid (Dekalb DK589RR, 108crm);<br />

AgrEvo systems utilized a glufosinate-resistant com hybrid (pioneer 34A55LL, llOcrm); and<br />

Cyanamid systems utilized an imidazolmone-resistant com hybrid (Pioneer 33951R, II0crm).<br />

Controlof common lambsquarters(Chenopodium Album L.), commonragweed(Ambrosia<br />

artemisiijolia L.), large crabgrass (Digitaria sangutnalis (L.) Scop.), and ivyleaf momingglory<br />

(Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq)wereevaluatedvisually.Com yields andrelativesystem costs<br />

were also compared.<br />

AJI of the systems provided excellent common lambsquarters control (>93%). All of the systems<br />

providedexcellent commonragweedcontrol(>91%)exceptCyanamidsystemsat both PREtb<br />

POST (86%) and EPOST (76%). All of the systems provided very good to excellent control of<br />

large crabgrass (>87%) except the DuPont system at EPOST (75%) and AgrEvo systems at both<br />

EPOST (79%) and MPOST (65%). Many of the systems provided very good control of ivyleaf<br />

momingglory(>84%). However,the DuPont,Monsanto,andAgrEvoEPOSTsystems provided<br />

72%, 80%, and 79% ivyleaf momingglory control, respectively.<br />

Yield reductionsattributedto reducedweed controlwere observedin the CyanamidPRE fb<br />

POST system, EPOST systems from DuPont, AgrEvo, and Cyanamid, and the AgrEvo MPOST<br />

system. Loweryields in all of the Monsantosystemswereattributedto com hybrid. This<br />

hybrid'smaturityappearedto beshorterin thistest thanrelativematurityratingswould suggest,<br />

andit was moreproneto lodging. Calculatednet returnswere lowerwiththe CyanamidPREfb<br />

POST system, the DuPont and Cyanamid EPOST systems, and the AgrEvo MPOST system.<br />

lExt. Assoc. andAssoc. Prof., Dept.PlantandSoil Sci., Universityof Delaware, Res. and<br />

Educ. Ctr., Georgetown, DE 19947; and DuPont Agricultura1 Products<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!