08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EFFECTS OF MANGANESE AND BORON ON GLYPHOSATE AND SULFOSATE<br />

ACTIVITY IN GLYPHOSATE- TOLERANT SOYBEAN<br />

W.A. Bailey, H.P. Wilson, T.E. Hines, D.H. Poston and R.J. Richardson l<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Foliarapplicationsof manganese(Mn) to soybean(Glycine max (1.) Merr.) area common<br />

practicein coastalplainsoils wheredeficienciesof thisnutrientfrequentlyoccur. Thesefoliar<br />

applications are typically made just prior to or at the bloom stage of soybean growth. Many<br />

soybeanproducersapplyfoliarnutrientsandherbicidessimultaneouslyforconvenience.<br />

However,somenutrientssuchas Mn affectherbicideperformancewhenmixedwithherbicides.<br />

Recentspeculationthatfoliarapplicationsof boron (B) could enhancesoybean yield has<br />

promptedinterestin mixingB withpostemergenceherbicides.<br />

FieldexperimentswereconductedattheEasternShoreAgriculturalResearchandExtension<br />

Center near Painter, VA in 1998 and 1999 to determine if additions of two formulations ofMn<br />

and one of B would affect weed control by glyphosate and sulfosate. Glyphosate and sulfosate<br />

rates were 0.5 and 1.0 Ib ailA in both yr and herbicides were also included at 1.25 lblA with Mn<br />

in 1999. LigninandchelateformulationsofMn at4%v/v of the totalspraymix were included<br />

both yr with each rate of glyphosate and sulfosate. All treatments with Mn were applied<br />

approximately 30 d after planting. In additional treatments, the effects ofB at 0.251b1A with or<br />

without 4.25 IbiA anunonium sulfate (NH.SO.) were investigated. Herbicides plus B<br />

combinationswereappliedatsoybeanbloomorsequentiallyat 3 wk afterplantingfollowedby<br />

applicationatbloom.<br />

Soybean injury from herbicide treatments was genera11y 0 to 3% from glyphosate treatments<br />

and 2 to 6% from sulfosate treatments regardless ofMn or B additions. Both Mn formulations<br />

reducedcontrolof commonlambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), commonragweed<br />

(Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), threemominggloryspecies(Ipomoea spp.), andlargecrabgrass<br />

(Digitaria sanguinolis L.) by O.5lb/A glyphosate or sulfosate 28 to 53%. Similar reductions in<br />

controlof commonlambsquarters, commonragweed,andlargecrabgrassoccurredwhenMn<br />

lignin or Mn chelate were added to glyphosate and sulfosate at 1.0 and 1.25 IblA. Additions of<br />

B or B plus anunonium sulfate to glyphosate and sulfosate did not reduce weed control in 1999.<br />

In addition to other data, pHs of herbicide solutions were measured. Glyphosate and sulfosate<br />

decreased pHs of water used as herbicide carrier from 7.8 to 5.1 and 4.9, respectively. Addition<br />

of Mn lignin had little effect on raising the pH of standard herbicide solutions while additions of<br />

Mn chelate and B (with or without anunonium sulfate) increased pH to 6.7 and 7.3, respectively,<br />

in solutionswithglyphosateandsulfosate.<br />

IGraduate ResearchAssistant,Professor,ResearchSpecialistSenior,FacultyResearch<br />

Associate, and Graduate Research Assistant, respectively, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and<br />

State University, Eastem Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Painter, VA<br />

23420-2827.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!