08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WEED CONTROL PROGRAMS WITH GLUFOSINA TE- AND<br />

GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT FIELD CORN<br />

P.J. Stachowski and R.R. Hahn'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Field experimentswere establishedin 1999to evaluatethe effect of applicationtimingof<br />

glufosinateandglyphosatetreatmentson weedcontrolandcom (Zea mays L.) yields andto<br />

evaluate the effect of residual herbicides with glyphosate. A preemergence (PRE) standard of s­<br />

metolachlor/atrazineplus pendimethalinwasappliedin all experiments. Applicationsof 1.34tb<br />

ailA of glufosinatelatrazine (Liberty ATZ) were made early, mid- and late postemergence<br />

(EPOST, MPOST, and LPOST) at one location. Glyphosate applications of lib ailA were made<br />

EPOST, MPOST, and LPOST at threelocations. In addition, EPOST applications of glyphosate<br />

weremadein combinationswith residualherbicides.<br />

All glufosinatelatrazine applications provided excellent (94%+) velvetleaf (Abuti/on<br />

theophrasti Medicus) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.) control except the MPOST<br />

applicationwhichcontrolled65%of thevelvetleaf. Controlof velvetleaf andgreenfoxtailwas<br />

only 9 and 33% respectively with the PRE standard due to limited rainfall for herbicide<br />

activation. With limited rainfall throughout the season, silage com yields with the EPOST,<br />

MPOST, and LPOST glufosinatelatrazine applications were only 10.1, 8.I and 6.9 T/A<br />

respectively. The PRE standard yielded 6.3 T/A and the untreated check 3.3 T/A. Although<br />

application timing in an adjacent glyphosate-resistant com experiment planted the same day<br />

affected velvetIeaf control, it did not affect green foxtail control or grain com yields. In a second<br />

experiment planted 10 days later, velvetleaf control was 96, 80, and 47% for the EPOST,<br />

MPOST, and LPOST glyphosate applications respectively. Green foxtail control was 94, 98, and<br />

30% and com yields were 108,98, and 44 buiA respectively. By compatison, the PRE standard<br />

controlled 60 and 89% of the velvetIeaf and foxtail respectively and yielded 91 bu/A. The yield<br />

from the untreated check was 20 bulA. An experiment with heavy velvet1eaf and redroot<br />

pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) pressurewas conductedwith glyphosate-resistantcom.<br />

Velvetleaf and pigweed control were 60 and 90'/0 respectively with the PRE standard. The three<br />

POST glyphosate applications controlled an average of 97 and 96% of the velvet1eaf and<br />

pigweed respectively. The average yield for the threeglyphosate treatments was 181 bulA<br />

compared with 173 and 107 bulA for the PRE standard and untreated check respectively.<br />

Finally, in an experiment with triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.)<br />

and fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.) control averaged 97 and 98% respectively<br />

for the three POST glyphosate treatments compared with 89 and 97% respectively for the PRE<br />

standard.Therewere no significantdifferencesincom yield amongthese treatments. The<br />

addition of residual herbicides to EPOST glyphosate treatments had little impact on weed control<br />

ratingsor graincom yields inthese experiments.<br />

'Res. Supp. Spec. and Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Crop and Soil Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY<br />

14853.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!