Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WEED CONTROL PROGRAMS WITH GLUFOSINA TE- AND<br />
GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT FIELD CORN<br />
P.J. Stachowski and R.R. Hahn'<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Field experimentswere establishedin 1999to evaluatethe effect of applicationtimingof<br />
glufosinateandglyphosatetreatmentson weedcontrolandcom (Zea mays L.) yields andto<br />
evaluate the effect of residual herbicides with glyphosate. A preemergence (PRE) standard of s<br />
metolachlor/atrazineplus pendimethalinwasappliedin all experiments. Applicationsof 1.34tb<br />
ailA of glufosinatelatrazine (Liberty ATZ) were made early, mid- and late postemergence<br />
(EPOST, MPOST, and LPOST) at one location. Glyphosate applications of lib ailA were made<br />
EPOST, MPOST, and LPOST at threelocations. In addition, EPOST applications of glyphosate<br />
weremadein combinationswith residualherbicides.<br />
All glufosinatelatrazine applications provided excellent (94%+) velvetleaf (Abuti/on<br />
theophrasti Medicus) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.) control except the MPOST<br />
applicationwhichcontrolled65%of thevelvetleaf. Controlof velvetleaf andgreenfoxtailwas<br />
only 9 and 33% respectively with the PRE standard due to limited rainfall for herbicide<br />
activation. With limited rainfall throughout the season, silage com yields with the EPOST,<br />
MPOST, and LPOST glufosinatelatrazine applications were only 10.1, 8.I and 6.9 T/A<br />
respectively. The PRE standard yielded 6.3 T/A and the untreated check 3.3 T/A. Although<br />
application timing in an adjacent glyphosate-resistant com experiment planted the same day<br />
affected velvetIeaf control, it did not affect green foxtail control or grain com yields. In a second<br />
experiment planted 10 days later, velvetleaf control was 96, 80, and 47% for the EPOST,<br />
MPOST, and LPOST glyphosate applications respectively. Green foxtail control was 94, 98, and<br />
30% and com yields were 108,98, and 44 buiA respectively. By compatison, the PRE standard<br />
controlled 60 and 89% of the velvetIeaf and foxtail respectively and yielded 91 bu/A. The yield<br />
from the untreated check was 20 bulA. An experiment with heavy velvet1eaf and redroot<br />
pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) pressurewas conductedwith glyphosate-resistantcom.<br />
Velvetleaf and pigweed control were 60 and 90'/0 respectively with the PRE standard. The three<br />
POST glyphosate applications controlled an average of 97 and 96% of the velvet1eaf and<br />
pigweed respectively. The average yield for the threeglyphosate treatments was 181 bulA<br />
compared with 173 and 107 bulA for the PRE standard and untreated check respectively.<br />
Finally, in an experiment with triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.)<br />
and fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.) control averaged 97 and 98% respectively<br />
for the three POST glyphosate treatments compared with 89 and 97% respectively for the PRE<br />
standard.Therewere no significantdifferencesincom yield amongthese treatments. The<br />
addition of residual herbicides to EPOST glyphosate treatments had little impact on weed control<br />
ratingsor graincom yields inthese experiments.<br />
'Res. Supp. Spec. and Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Crop and Soil Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY<br />
14853.<br />
42