08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EFFECT OF HERBICIDE RATE, SEQUENTIAL HERBICIDE<br />

TREATMENT, AND MOWING ON MUGWORT CONTROL<br />

K. W. Bradley and E. S. Hagood '<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Three field trials were conducted during 1998 and repeated in 1999 to evaluate mugwort<br />

(Artemesia vulgaris L.) control with several herbicides and herbicide/mowing regimes. A<br />

logarithmicsprayerwas utilizedin the ftrstfield trialto determineherbiciderates thatprovide<br />

acceptablemugwortcontrol. Sequentialherbicidetreatments wereappliedto mugwortat 7-week<br />

intervals in the second field trial to evaluate mugwort control following one. two. and three<br />

herbicideapplications. In the thirdfield trial.the effect of sequentialmowing was investigated<br />

by applying herbicides to mugwort regrowth following either one or two mowings. The<br />

herbicides evaluated in all three field trials included 2,4-D amine, 2, 4-D ester, dicamba,<br />

triclopyr, clopyralid, picloram, metsulfuron, glyphosate, and glufosinate. Pelargonic acid was<br />

also evaluated as an addition to 2,4-D amine, glyphosate, and glufosinate in the logarithmic<br />

sprayer trial. In the logarithmic sprayer trial, all herbicides except for metsulfuron were<br />

evaluated at the rates of 8, 4, 2, I, 0.5, and 0.251b ai per acre. Metsulfuron was evaluated at an<br />

analogous rate range with the highest rate being 0.56 lb ai per acre. In the sequential herbicide<br />

and sequential mowing trials, 2,4-D amine, 2,4-D ester, and glyphosate were applied at 4.0 Ib ai<br />

per acre, triclopyr and dicarnba at 2.0 Ib ai per acre, glufosinate at 1.5 Ib ai per acre, picloram at<br />

1.0 lb ai per acre, clopyraIid at 0.251b ai per acre, and metsu1furon at 0.Ql121b ai per acre.<br />

In the logarithmic sprayer trial, 100% control of mugwort was achieved with all rates of<br />

picloram during both years. In 1998, all rates of clopyralid provided greater than 95% control of<br />

mugwort. In 1999, however, slightly lower levels of control were observed at the 0.25, 0.5, 1.0<br />

and 2.0 Ib clopyralid rates. The next highest level ofmugwort control was achieved with the 8,<br />

4, and 2 lb glyphosate rates, which provided greater than 90% control in both years. Dicamba<br />

also provided greater then 90% mugwort control at the 8 lb rate during both years. All remaining<br />

herbicides generally provided unacceptable control of mugwort.<br />

Sequential herbicide treatment trials conducted during both years revealed that only one<br />

application of picloram was required to provide 100"10mugwort control. Additionally, two or<br />

three treatments of clopyralid or glyphosate did not significantly enhance mugwort control<br />

comparedto one applicationof these herbicides. In 1998. a secondapplicationof2.4-D amine,<br />

2,4-D ester, dicarnba, or triclopyr significantly improved mugwort control, however a third<br />

application of any of these herbicides was not warranted. Mugwort control was also<br />

significantly improved with each additional application of glufosinate in 1998.<br />

In the sequentialmowingtrial.two mowingsdid not significantlyenhancemugwortcontrolin<br />

theclopyralid,dicamba,metsulfuron,picloram,ortriclopyrtreatmentsin eitheryear. In 1998, a<br />

second mugwort mowing significantly improved mugwort control in plots treated with 2, 4-D<br />

amine, 2, 4-D ester, glyphosate, and glufosinate. In 1999, however, the second mowing only<br />

enhanced mugwort control in plots treatedwith 2. 4pDester and glufosinate.<br />

'Grad. Res. Asst., and Prof., Dept. of Plant Path., Phys., and <strong>Weed</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, Virginia Polytechnic<br />

lnst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!