08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WEED CONTROL AND YIELD OF CUT FLOWERS TREATED WITH TWO HERBICIDES<br />

E. Jay Holcomb, Tracey Harpster, Larry Kuhns, and Robert Berghage'<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This experiment was designed. to compare the productivity of four species of cut flowers<br />

treated with either napropamide or dithiopyr to weeded control plots, and to determine the<br />

effectiveness of the herbicides in controlling weeds. <strong>Weed</strong> control with napropamide and<br />

ditbiopyr was similar for the cut flowers tested. Applications of both napropamide and dithiopyr<br />

had a slight depressing effect on plant quality. However, at harvest only celosia had shorter<br />

stems and reduced fresh weight due to napropamide and dithiopyr application.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Pest infestations are one of the most frequent causes of reduced yield of cut flowers, and<br />

weeds are one of the pests that must be controlled. If weeds are left uncontrolled, yield of many<br />

cut flowers are dramatically reduced. However, manually controlling the weeds can be very<br />

expensive in terms of time and labor and desirable plants are often damaged by mechanical and<br />

hand removal of weeds.<br />

The pre-emergent herbicide that some cut flower growers use is napropamide. In<br />

previous research we determined that napropamide gave good early season weed control but<br />

marginal late season weed control and that one species of cut flower, celosia, was injured by it<br />

early in the season. A new herbicide, dithiopyr, has recently been labeled for ornamentals. This<br />

set of studies was established to compare the productivity of four species of cut flowers treated<br />

with either napropamide or dithiopyr to weeded control plots, and to determine the effectiveness<br />

of the herbicides in controlling weeds.<br />

METHODS AND MATERIALS<br />

Seeds of cockscomb (Celosia cristata L.). Cramers Yardstick (Artemesia annua L.), and<br />

China aster (Callistephus chinensis (L.) Noes) were germinated in the greenhouse in mid March<br />

and were planted to the field on June g, 1999. Two millets, Tapestry (Echinochloa crus-galli<br />

(L.) Beauvois) and Spray (Setaria italica (L.) Beauvois), were sown directly in the field on June<br />

8. In the field lbe plants were grown in raised bedstbat 6 feet long and 30 inches wide with drip<br />

tape running down the center of the bed. There were two rows of plants on each bed and the<br />

plants were spaced about 1 foot apart in the row. On June II treatments in Table 1 were applied<br />

to the celosia, artemesia and China aster. The treatments were applied to both millets on June 29.<br />

All beds were hand weeded before herbicide applications. The first herbicide application<br />

was made on June 11 between 8:00 and 10:00 am. Conditions at the time of the application were<br />

clear and sunny, 67° F with 0 to 3 mph winds. The June 29 applications were applied from 4:00<br />

1 Professor, Research Associate, Professor, and Assistant Professor of Horticulture, Department of Horticulture, The<br />

Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!