Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 54â2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
SWEET CORN TOLERANCE TO NICOSULFURON AND CARFENTRAZONE C. E. Beste' ABSTRACT PostemergenceherbicidesprovideIPMoptionsfor sweet com (Zea mays saccharata L.). Nicosulfuronandcarfentrazonewereevaluatedwithnon-ionicsurfactantas postemergence treatmentson severalsweet com varieties. Inthemid-Atlanticarea,othercropsareplantedafter sweetcom harvest;therefore,postemergence herbicidesforsweetcom shouldnot affect successivecrops. Nicosulfuronandcarfentrazoneappearto havethatcharacteristic. Sweet com was planted in 36 inch row widths on May 4 and June II, 1999, in a Norfolk loamy sand (0.6% OM) and sprinkler irrigated as needed. Preemergence herbicides, S metolachlor (0.78Ib ailA) and atrazine (1.0 Ib ailA) were applied to the May 4 planting, whereas, only S-metolachlor (0.63 Ib ailA) was applied to the June II planting. Postemergence treatments were applied at the fifth leaf collar stage-of-growth (approx. 29 days afier planting) and the June II planting received an additional five day delayed post treatment at the sixth leaf collar growth stage. The spray volumes on the May 4 and June II plantings were 31 and 17 gal/A, respectively. Non-ionic surfactant was added to all treatments at 0.25% VN. Nicosulfuron at 0.031 and 0.062 Ib ailA, postemergence on the sweet com varieties, 'Bonus/Attribute' (yellow, Se) and 'GSS 9299' (yellow, Sh2) did not reduce yields with or without husks. 'Sterling' (white, Su) yield with or without husks was unaffected by nicosulfuron at 0.0621b ailA. Nicosulfuron, 0.1251b ailA postemergence to 'Bonus/Attribute', 'Sterling' and 'GSS 9299' did not reduce sweet com yields in the husk; however, only the yield of 'Sterling' and 'GSS 9299' without husks was slightly depressed, which indicated a slightly smaller cut-off com yield. The June II planting of 'Bonus/Attribute' was treated with nicosulfuron, 0.0781b ailA and the yield with husk was not reduced; whereas, yield withont the husk was reduced. The yield of varieties, 'Fantasia' (white, Se), 'Dynamo' (yellow, Su) and 'Esquire' (yellow, Su) were not reduced by nicosulfuron at 0.031 Ib ailA; however, rates of 0.062 and 0.125 Ib ailA caused yield reductions. 'Early Cogent'(white, Su) shoepeg-type sweet com yields were not affected by nicosulfuron, 0.062 and O.l251b ailA. Sweet com injury symptomswereprimarilychlorosis;however,tolerantvarietieshadmuchless chlorosisthan susceptible varieties. Tolerant varieties may have 20 to 30'10growth reduction at the high rates without a yield reduction; whereas, susceptible varieties hadyield losses. Carfentrazone,0.008 and0.0161b ailA, did not reduce growth or yields of 'Sterling' or 'Bonus/Attribute' sweet com. Thecarfentrazoneinjurysymptomwas a bandof chlorosis acrossemergingleaves at the timeof application.Nicosulfuron injurywas associatedwithdistortedstraightnessof kernelrows; whereas,carfentrazonedid not affectkernelorientation.Applicationof nicosulfuron,0.125 lb ailA at the sixth coUarstagedid not significantlyincreaseinjurycomparedto applicationatthe fifthcollarstageof sweet com growth. Commercialcontrolof momingglory(Ipomoea spp.)was providedby bothnicosulfuronandcarfentrazone.Yellow nutsedge(Cyperus esculentus L.) was suppressedby nicosulfuron. Nicosulfuronmaybe appliedpostemergenceonly to sweet com varietieswhichhave demonstratedtolerance;whereas,carfentrazone, postemergence,appearsto have less potentialto injuresweet com varieties. 'Assoc. Prof., Salisbury Facility, University of Maryland, Salisbury, MD 21801 128
COMPARISON OF USING LEAF AREA AND WEED DENSITY AS PREDICTORS IN MODELING INTERFERENCE Rongwei Fu l and Richard A. Ashley' ABSTRACT Weed density model and leaf area model are two of the many empirical models developed to quantifythe cropyield responeto weed interference.The formeruses the weed density as the predictorandis widelyused in thepresentweed managementsystems.The latteruses the leaf area index (LA!) as the predictor and has the potential to provide better fit of data and more accurate predictiveability.The perfonnanceof the two models were evaluatedto see whichmodel give a better fit of data and seek information useful for a better weedmanagement system. The experimentswere conductedon the researchstationof Departmentof PlantScience, University of Connecticut at Mansfield, CT in 1999. The model crop is bell pepper Capsicum annuumL. andtheweeds includetwo species: redrootpigweedArmaranthusretrofIexusL.. and large crabgrass Digitaria sanguinalis eLl Scop.. Seedlings emerged right after transplanting of peppers were the target weeds of this stody. Weed densities of 0, 1,2,4,8,16,32 plants molwere establishedfor each species within 15cm on either side of the crop row. Additionalplots were established to measure leaf area of pepper and weeds. The leaf area was measured at approximately 3, 4 and 5 weeks after transplanting (WAT) pepper into field. The models were compared by the residual mean squares (RMS). The smaller the residual mean square, the better thedata were described by the model. Both models gave a good fit of the crabgrass data. The RMS of the weeddensity model is 6.18. For leaf area model, the RMSs were 4.54, 4.54 and 3.76 when the predictor was the LA! calculated from the leaf area measured on 3, 4, 5 WAT. Hence the model using LA! of 5 WAT gave the best fit of data. However, by the time of 5 WAT, the seedlings of crabgrass bad already been relatively large. The leaf area at 3 or 4 WAT still could be a good predictor since the RMS's are only slightly larger. Besides, both models bave two important parameters: weed-free yield and maximum yield loss to be estimated. The estimated weed-free yield agreed with the actual weedfreeyield underall cases, but the maximumyield loss were all a little overestimatedwith the weed-density model baving the closest estimate to be 101.1%. The actual maximum yield loss was 93.1%. The LA! measured on 3 WAT showed to be best predicator of pigweed yield loss. The model estimateof maximumyield loss was 99.6%andvery close to the actualmaximwn loss of 98.7%. The RMS was 0.32, the smallest one among all models. The RMSs of the other two leaf area models were 0.35 and 0.34. The weed-density model bad the largest RMS of 0.54. The maximumyield loss was all a little overestimatedunderthe othersituations.All models gave a good estimate of weed-free yield. I GraduateAssistant, Dept. of Plant Science, University ofConnccticut, Stem, CT 06269 ! ProfessorofHorticulturc,Dept.of PlantScience,Universityof Connecticut,Stom, cr 06269 129
- Page 77 and 78: Table I: Swnmary of brush managemen
- Page 79 and 80: Table I: Sequence codes and general
- Page 81 and 82: IR-4 ORNAMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRESS F
- Page 83 and 84: personnel with many of the illegal
- Page 85 and 86: TOLERANCE OF ORNAMENTAL GROUNDCOVER
- Page 87 and 88: MUGWORT CONTROL WITH CLOPYRALID AND
- Page 89 and 90: POTENTIAL WEEDINESS OF SEVERAL NEW
- Page 91 and 92: Table I: Identification, morphologi
- Page 93 and 94: Trifolium tricolor 232 26 62 0 18 S
- Page 95 and 96: NUTRIENT REMOVAL BY WEEDS IN CONTAI
- Page 97 and 98: CONTROL OF POAANNUA FROM MULTIPLE S
- Page 99 and 100: ANNUAL BLUEGRASS (PDaannual CONTROL
- Page 101 and 102: LATERAL DEVELOPMENT OF PLANT oaowra
- Page 103 and 104: RE-ROOTING OF FOUR VARIETIES OF CRE
- Page 105 and 106: Table 2. Top growth weights (fresh)
- Page 107 and 108: CONTROL OF DALLISGRASS IN COOL SEAS
- Page 109 and 110: Kentucky bluegrass was rated to hav
- Page 111 and 112: Table 2. Fresh weight (grams) barve
- Page 113 and 114: MANAGING FENOXAPROP RESIST ANT CRAB
- Page 115 and 116: ADVANCED FORMULATION TECHNOLOGY FOR
- Page 117 and 118: Table I. Preemergence smooth crabgr
- Page 119 and 120: 0.57EW at O.l21bs ai/A plus Confron
- Page 121 and 122: EFFICACY OF DITHIOPYR FORMULATIONS
- Page 123 and 124: EFFECTS OF DROUGHT ON THE INTERFERE
- Page 125 and 126: WEED MANAGEMENT WITH HALOSULFURON I
- Page 127: WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN WITH CAR
- Page 131 and 132: RESULTS OF NEW YORK VINEYARD TRIALS
- Page 133 and 134: HERBICIDE TOLERANCE IN CRANBERRIES
- Page 135 and 136: Classification based on action on a
- Page 137 and 138: EFFECTS OF SEVERAL POTENTIALLY USEF
- Page 139 and 140: Supplement of the 53 rd Annual Meet
- Page 141 and 142: with society activities to anyone.
- Page 143 and 144: WINTER SQUASH CULTIVARS DIFFER IN R
- Page 145 and 146: INCORPORATING QUINCLORAC IN AUTUMN
- Page 147 and 148: Control efforts aim to eradicate bo
- Page 149 and 150: Table I Weed canopy, insect and dis
- Page 151 and 152: Table 1: Percent mortality of respr
SWEET CORN TOLERANCE TO NICOSULFURON AND CARFENTRAZONE<br />
C. E. Beste'<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
PostemergenceherbicidesprovideIPMoptionsfor sweet com (Zea mays saccharata L.).<br />
Nicosulfuronandcarfentrazonewereevaluatedwithnon-ionicsurfactantas postemergence<br />
treatmentson severalsweet com varieties. Inthemid-Atlanticarea,othercropsareplantedafter<br />
sweetcom harvest;therefore,postemergence herbicidesforsweetcom shouldnot affect<br />
successivecrops. Nicosulfuronandcarfentrazoneappearto havethatcharacteristic.<br />
Sweet com was planted in 36 inch row widths on May 4 and June II, 1999, in a Norfolk<br />
loamy sand (0.6% OM) and sprinkler irrigated as needed. Preemergence herbicides, S<br />
metolachlor (0.78Ib ailA) and atrazine (1.0 Ib ailA) were applied to the May 4 planting, whereas,<br />
only S-metolachlor (0.63 Ib ailA) was applied to the June II planting. Postemergence<br />
treatments were applied at the fifth leaf collar stage-of-growth (approx. 29 days afier planting)<br />
and the June II planting received an additional five day delayed post treatment at the sixth leaf<br />
collar growth stage. The spray volumes on the May 4 and June II plantings were 31 and 17<br />
gal/A, respectively. Non-ionic surfactant was added to all treatments at 0.25% VN.<br />
Nicosulfuron at 0.031 and 0.062 Ib ailA, postemergence on the sweet com varieties,<br />
'Bonus/Attribute' (yellow, Se) and 'GSS 9299' (yellow, Sh2) did not reduce yields with or<br />
without husks. 'Sterling' (white, Su) yield with or without husks was unaffected by<br />
nicosulfuron at 0.0621b ailA. Nicosulfuron, 0.1251b ailA postemergence to 'Bonus/Attribute',<br />
'Sterling' and 'GSS 9299' did not reduce sweet com yields in the husk; however, only the yield<br />
of 'Sterling' and 'GSS 9299' without husks was slightly depressed, which indicated a slightly<br />
smaller cut-off com yield. The June II planting of 'Bonus/Attribute' was treated with<br />
nicosulfuron, 0.0781b ailA and the yield with husk was not reduced; whereas, yield withont the<br />
husk was reduced. The yield of varieties, 'Fantasia' (white, Se), 'Dynamo' (yellow, Su) and<br />
'Esquire' (yellow, Su) were not reduced by nicosulfuron at 0.031 Ib ailA; however, rates of<br />
0.062 and 0.125 Ib ailA caused yield reductions. 'Early Cogent'(white, Su) shoepeg-type sweet<br />
com yields were not affected by nicosulfuron, 0.062 and O.l251b ailA. Sweet com injury<br />
symptomswereprimarilychlorosis;however,tolerantvarietieshadmuchless chlorosisthan<br />
susceptible varieties. Tolerant varieties may have 20 to 30'10growth reduction at the high rates<br />
without a yield reduction; whereas, susceptible varieties hadyield losses. Carfentrazone,0.008<br />
and0.0161b ailA, did not reduce growth or yields of 'Sterling' or 'Bonus/Attribute' sweet com.<br />
Thecarfentrazoneinjurysymptomwas a bandof chlorosis acrossemergingleaves at the timeof<br />
application.Nicosulfuron injurywas associatedwithdistortedstraightnessof kernelrows;<br />
whereas,carfentrazonedid not affectkernelorientation.Applicationof nicosulfuron,0.125 lb<br />
ailA at the sixth coUarstagedid not significantlyincreaseinjurycomparedto applicationatthe<br />
fifthcollarstageof sweet com growth. Commercialcontrolof momingglory(Ipomoea spp.)was<br />
providedby bothnicosulfuronandcarfentrazone.Yellow nutsedge(Cyperus esculentus L.) was<br />
suppressedby nicosulfuron.<br />
Nicosulfuronmaybe appliedpostemergenceonly to sweet com varietieswhichhave<br />
demonstratedtolerance;whereas,carfentrazone, postemergence,appearsto have less potentialto<br />
injuresweet com varieties.<br />
'Assoc. Prof., Salisbury Facility, University of Maryland, Salisbury, MD 21801<br />
128