08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 54—2000 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RESPONSE OF KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS AND PERENNIAL RYEGRASS TO TIffi<br />

APPLICATIONS OF ETIffiPHON UNDER REDUCED LIGHT CONDITIONS<br />

T. L. Watschke and J. A. Borger'<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Little is known about the effects that ethephon might have on the turf quality of perennial<br />

ryegrass and Kentucky hluegrass grown underdifferent levels of shade. Six studies were<br />

conducted on a mature stand of perennial ryegrass (three studies) and Kentucky hluegrass (three<br />

studies) at the Landscape Management Research Center, Penn State University, University Park,<br />

Po. The objective of the studies was to determine whether ethephon treated turf would have<br />

improved quality under varying levels of shade.<br />

METHODS AND MATERIALS<br />

Each study was a randomized complete block design with three replications. All of the<br />

treatments (ethephon at 3,5, and 10 ozlM) were applied on June 21,1999 using a three foot CO,<br />

powered boom sprayer calibrated to deliver 40 gpa using two, flat fan, 6504 nozzles at 40 psi.<br />

Each study area was covered with a shade cloth (kept twenty inches above the turf canopy<br />

with a wooden rack) to simulate shade. Shade was imposed at three levels (30, 55 and 73 pereent<br />

light filtering). The racks with shade cloth were removed each week to record data and mow and<br />

thenreturned.<br />

All test sites were maintainedat two andone halfincheswith a rotarymower with<br />

clippingsremoved.Thetest site was irrigatedas neededfor thedurationof the study. Color<br />

ratingsweretakenapproximatelyevery seven days for six weeks. Freshweights (g) were<br />

harvestedusing a twenty inchrotarymowermakingone pass perplot on Aug 3.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

On July 20, (approximately one month aflertreatment) the color ratings for Kentucky<br />

bluegrass tended to produce a trend whereby a slight increase in color was observed as the rate of<br />

ethephon increased from 3 to 10 ozIM across all three levels of shade (Table 1). On July 27,<br />

Kentucky bluegrass treated with ethephon at the lowest level of shade (30"10)had a slightly better<br />

color than untreated turf. This trend was not found on the final rating date (Aug 3).\<br />

Kentucky bluegrass shaded at the 55% level tended to have improved color on July 27<br />

compared to untreated turf. By the final rating date (Aug 3) all ethephon treated Kentucky<br />

bluegrass was rated below the acceptable level of 7. Only untreated turf was rated as acceptable.<br />

On July 20, Kentucky bluegrass treated with ethephon at the 10 ozIM rate and exposed to<br />

73% shade was rated above the level of acceptably (7). At 73% shade, all treated and untreated<br />

'Professor andResearchAssistant,respectively.Departmentof Agronomy.PennState<br />

University, University Park, Po, 16802<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!