08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

91.<br />

Chemical <strong>Weed</strong> Control in Onions Grown on Mineral Soils<br />

Charles J. Noll 1<br />

In the 1959 onion weeding experiment only one chemical, CIPC,<br />

out of 7 chemicals in the test offered promise for the weeding of this<br />

crop. In last years experiment there was found to be an increase in<br />

onion yield and an increase in weed control as the rate of CIPC<br />

application increased from 4 to 6 to 8 1bs. per acre applied the day<br />

after seeding. The possibility that time' of pre-emergence application<br />

might be important as well as rate of a.pp1ication was taken into<br />

consideration in planning work in 1960.<br />

Procedure<br />

The variety Sweet Spanish was seeded May 2, 1960. The<br />

pre-emergence treatments were applied from 2 to 10 days after seeding.<br />

The emergence treatment with KOCNwas made 19 days after seeding and<br />

the post-emergence treatments with Atratone 30 days after seeding.<br />

The soil at planting time was dry and no rain fell until the 6th day<br />

after seeding. Sufficient rain was received from the 6th day after<br />

seeding through the next few days to germinate the onions and weeds.<br />

Individual plots were 28 feet long and 2 feet wide. Treatments were<br />

randomized in each of 8 blocks.<br />

The chemicals were applied with a small sprayer over the row for<br />

a width of 12 inches. Cultivation contro11~d: the weeds between the<br />

rows. The growing season was cooler than average and rainfall below<br />

normal. An estimate of weed control was made June 30 on a basis of<br />

1 to 10, 1 being most desirable and 10 being least desirable. Onions<br />

were harvested September 28.<br />

Results<br />

The results are presented in Table 1. All chemicals gave highly<br />

significant increase in weed control as compared to the untreated check.<br />

All chemicals, except Dactha1 had increasing weed control as the rates<br />

of application increased. Dacthal had equal weed control at 6, "9, and<br />

12 Lbs , per acre. <strong>Weed</strong> control was genera1J.y from fair to poor. The<br />

time of application of CIPC had little effect on the weed control<br />

rating, although in general the later applications resulted in poorer<br />

weed control.<br />

1 Associate Professor of 01ericu1ture, Dept. of Horticulture, College<br />

of Agriculture and Experiment Station, Pennsylvania State University,<br />

University Park, Penna.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!