08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stauffer<br />

2061 wasoutstanding.<br />

There is considerable advantage to a Borax treatment since fertilizers usually<br />

contain enough fertilizer grade Borate to supply 40 lbs • borax per acre as<br />

was Bupplied with the 13.8 lb. Boron rate of Solubor and Fertilizer borate.<br />

The 27.8 and55.6 Boron rates could leave toxic residues in the soil that would<br />

affect other .crops-grolhl in rotation with beets.<br />

As the season progressed Be~ts overcame the earlier stunting effects caused<br />

by Boron. .<br />

Expt. II<br />

The results of Expt. II are given in table 2.<br />

Table 2 M Table Beets<br />

.<br />

Tolerance of Beets and <strong>Weed</strong> Control Obtained with Eptam and Stauffer 2061<br />

Applied and Incorporated into the Soil 7/8/60 •• Beets Planted 7/8/60;<br />

7/15(60; and 7/26/60. Observations 8/19/60.<br />

Time elapse between *Material and Rate<br />

application of herbicide Eptam 2061<br />

and planting of beets 4 Ibs. 6 Ibs. 4 Ibs. 6 Ibs.<br />

Immediately 3.37 4.0 0.25 0.62<br />

7 days 3.31 4.37. 0.12 1.5<br />

18 days 2.75 3.75 0.25 0.5<br />

<strong>Weed</strong> Control 4.6 4.9 3.2 4.•.6<br />

*Rating syste~ same as in table 1.<br />

Discussion: Expt. II<br />

These data would indicate that table beets have a higher degree of tolerance<br />

to Stauffer 2061 than to Eptam. Beets pl~nted'~he day ef application showed<br />

only slight stunting from 2061 as compared to I1lmost complete crop destruction<br />

by Eptam.<br />

Eptam at equivalent rates gave better weed control than Stauffer 2061 •<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!