Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society Vol. 15â1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society
78. P~st-Transplanting and Lay-ByWeed Control In Processing Tomatoes Charles H. Moran* 1,., Favoreble weather condi tiona in 1960 and the use" of new improved varieties resulted in the highes~ average tomato yields ever obtained in New Jersey. A record mean yield of tons per acre was estimated by the Crop Repor..ting Service at the close of the season on October 1. The same weather conditions also afforded.one of the better tests for herbicide effectiveness experienced in recent years. Annual grasses, particularly crabgrass, were the major weed competitors in commercial tomato fields. The f:ollowing report presents the results of two series of experiments designed to control these competitors chemically. METHODSANDMATERIALS Similar field experiments were established on a Downer loamy fine sand and a Collington fine sandy loam near 'Moorestown, New Jer.sey. Southern grown tomato plants of the variety 146 were planted in the Downer and Collington soils May 11 and May14, respectively. Treatments were replicated four times in randomized blocks. Each plot was 4 rows wide x 20' long. Plants were spaced 2 feet apart in rows'which were" feet apart. Harvest records were obtained from the center 2 rows. At each location there wer~ two experiments. In the first, designated as post-transplanting, the herbicides were broadcast within three weeks of transplanting and no further treatments made. Check plots were, however, kept weed free by hoeing until the time of lay-by. In the second experiment, designated as lay-by, the plots were tractor cultivated and hand hoed as required until spread of the vines stopped passage of the tractor. The dates, rates of application and materials used in the four experiments are shown in Table 1. Sprays were applied broadcast with a single nozzle hand sprayer using the equivalent of 50 gallons of water per acre. Granular materials were spread by means of a hand shaker. Eptam was mixed with the surface soil by means of tractor cultivation. The principal weeds on the Downer sand were crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis (1) Scop), lambs-quarters (Cben0,podium album 1.), and pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Foxtail (SetarJ.a viridis (L) Beauv), bindweed * Divisional Manager of Agricultural Research, Campbell Soup Company, Riverton, New Jersey
(' ( ( Table 1 Rates and Dates of Herbicide Treatments on TwoSoil Types - 1960 Herbicide Lbs*' a.i. -A- 8** 4 4 4 15 Carrier Amiben 10 G 4 Granule Dacthal 50 WP Spray Eptam 5 G Granule Neburon 4 G Granule Solan N4512 Spray Zytron 25 G Granule * a.i. -active ingredients per acre •. ""i\" ~~ 12 Lbs, of Dacthal were used at lay-by. Post-Transplanting Application Downer Ifs Collington fsl 'JUne 1 June 3 June 1 June 3 June 1 June 3 June 1 June 3 June 15 June 17 June 1 - Lay-By Application , Downer lis Collington fal July 12 July 19 July 12 July 19 July 12 July 19 July 12 July 19 July 12 July 19 July 12 ~ --0 .
- Page 27 and 28: 27. (Lycbnis alba), cinquefoil (Pot
- Page 29 and 30: THE EFFECTS OF ADDED PENETRANT AIDS
- Page 31 and 32: ... Surfactant Produced bz: . 31
- Page 33 and 34: 33. 33. of scintillation solution,
- Page 35 and 36: Table 3. The Net Counts Per Minute
- Page 37 and 38: The comparisons for lower leaves, s
- Page 39 and 40: 39. SUMMARY Tests using 2-C 14-1abe
- Page 41 and 42: 41. RECENTDEVELOPMENTS IN THEUSE OF
- Page 43 and 44: second application be made not late
- Page 45 and 46: 45. Combinations of vegadex-Randox
- Page 47 and 48: 11/ Persistence of Soil-Incorporate
- Page 49 and 50: Plot size varied from 9 sq. ft. to
- Page 51 and 52: Lower rates of R-1856 were tested o
- Page 53 and 54: greenhouse tests are listed below.
- Page 55 and 56: PROGRESSREPORTON LAY-BYUEEDCONTROLI
- Page 57 and 58: 57. Table 1. Effect of sodium silic
- Page 59 and 60: Sheets (1959) studied, under labora
- Page 61 and 62: M, ',. • • •• • " ' Treat
- Page 63 and 64: Figure 1. Relative performance trea
- Page 65 and 66: A duplicate test was started August
- Page 67 and 68: 67. "he two tests which dealt with
- Page 69 and 70: 69. CONTROLOF WEEDSIN VEGETABLECROP
- Page 71 and 72: 71.' TABLE 3. RESPONSE OF VEGETABLE
- Page 73 and 74: 73. COHBIltit.TloNS' OF cnu:'PITH C
- Page 75 and 76: 75. Results The delay in applicatio
- Page 77: 77. Summary Logarithmic, tank-mixed
- Page 81 and 82: ( ( ( Table 3 Effect of Post-Tran~l
- Page 83 and 84: ( ( ( Table 5 Effect of Lay-By Herb
- Page 85 and 86: Chemical Weed Control Charles J. No
- Page 87 and 88: Table I. Weed control, plant stand,
- Page 89 and 90: Table 1 - Table Beets Pre-plant; Pr
- Page 91 and 92: 91. Chemical Weed Control in Onions
- Page 93 and 94: 93. Table I. l;ced control, plant s
- Page 95 and 96: 95. Results Survey Table I of Hando
- Page 97 and 98: 97. Weed counts were made 3 weeks a
- Page 99 and 100: 99. Third applications were made on
- Page 101 and 102: 1t1. ~ata - Onion stand counts, wee
- Page 103 and 104: The data in table 2 gives the signi
- Page 105 and 106: The following effects were noted. 1
- Page 107 and 108: PRE-fREATINGSOILS, APOSSIBLE.TECfiN
- Page 109 and 110: · 109. Table 2. The influence of d
- Page 111 and 112: ..... 11 ... - Progress Report on W
- Page 113 and 114: 113. fndothal as a pre-planting inc
- Page 115 and 116: 115~ Table 3. Mean markebab l.e 9£
- Page 117 and 118: 1170 Chemical Weed Control Charles
- Page 119 and 120: 119. Table I .. Weed contrOl! plant
- Page 121 and 122: 121. '- The stand of plants of bo
- Page 123 and 124: 123. Table II. Weed control stand a
- Page 125 and 126: EFFECTOF SEVERALHERBICIDESONEARLYYI
- Page 127 and 128: Table 2. Calcula.ted ecre yields of
78.<br />
P~st-Transplanting and Lay-By<strong>Weed</strong> Control<br />
In Processing Tomatoes<br />
Charles<br />
H. Moran*<br />
1,.,<br />
Favoreble weather condi tiona in 1960 and the use" of new improved<br />
varieties resulted in the highes~ average tomato yields ever obtained in<br />
New Jersey. A record mean yield of tons per acre was estimated by the<br />
Crop Repor..ting Service at the close of the season on October 1. The same<br />
weather conditions also afforded.one of the better tests for herbicide effectiveness<br />
experienced in recent years. Annual grasses, particularly<br />
crabgrass, were the major weed competitors in commercial tomato fields.<br />
The f:ollowing report presents the results of two series of experiments designed<br />
to control these competitors chemically.<br />
METHODSANDMATERIALS<br />
Similar field experiments were established on a Downer loamy fine<br />
sand and a Collington fine sandy loam near 'Moorestown, New Jer.sey.<br />
Southern grown tomato plants of the variety 146 were planted in<br />
the Downer and Collington soils May 11 and May14, respectively. Treatments<br />
were replicated four times in randomized blocks. Each plot was 4 rows wide<br />
x 20' long. Plants were spaced 2 feet apart in rows'which were" feet apart.<br />
Harvest records were obtained from the center 2 rows.<br />
At each location there wer~ two experiments. In the first, designated<br />
as post-transplanting, the herbicides were broadcast within three weeks<br />
of transplanting and no further treatments made. Check plots were, however,<br />
kept weed free by hoeing until the time of lay-by. In the second experiment,<br />
designated as lay-by, the plots were tractor cultivated and hand hoed as required<br />
until spread of the vines stopped passage of the tractor.<br />
The dates, rates of application and materials used in the four<br />
experiments are shown in Table 1. Sprays were applied broadcast with a<br />
single nozzle hand sprayer using the equivalent of 50 gallons of water per<br />
acre. Granular materials were spread by means of a hand shaker.<br />
Eptam was mixed with the surface soil by means of tractor cultivation.<br />
The principal weeds on the Downer sand were crabgrass (Digitaria<br />
sanguinalis (1) Scop), lambs-quarters (Cben0,podium album 1.), and pigweed<br />
(Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Foxtail (SetarJ.a viridis (L) Beauv), bindweed<br />
* Divisional Manager of Agricultural Research, Campbell Soup Company,<br />
Riverton, New Jersey