08.06.2015 Views

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

Vol. 15—1961 - NorthEastern Weed Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58.<br />

. .R. D. &wet' and Joseph Cia).one<br />

])epal'tmen;t of Vegetah1e crops, Cor~ University, Ithaca, N. Y.<br />

. *<br />

Although cmc-.:(2-ehloroaU71<br />

diethyld1~iocarbsmate) -has found considerable<br />

'Isage on ve$8tablecrops in Eastern United States, it bas not reached<br />

its fuU potential as a select1ve herbicide because of its errstic performance.<br />

elSC somet:t.mes faUB to control, Weds, and 1ft,' certain situations ~ injure<br />

the crop.. For best, performance _it is genere.U:y agreed that CDBCshould be<br />

applied' at planting and that ,~1gation should be given if rain does not occur<br />

soon after treating. In spite of these precautions, the performance ot cmc<br />

under t1~d conditions baa b4itenvariable. ~ purpose ot these investigations<br />

was to determine JIOre spec1t1ca1.ly the factors 1ntluenciDg C:r:£Cactivity under<br />

field conditions in order to avoid failures due to either crop injury or lack<br />

of weed kill. .<br />

Revd.ewof Literature<br />

'!'he activity of herbicides applied to the soU are known to be 1nf1uenced<br />

by marq, env1roD1lleutal and soll factors. Obtaining COIIIIIlerCia11Y acceptable<br />

veed control without crop inJury:trOll the proJer dosage at a presl:lD8bly selective<br />

soll .herbicide is a function ot the total influence of emtirol'.llDel1t and<br />

soil on the herbicide, on tbte veedJJ, and on the crop. The 1ntluencing factors<br />

most often. mentioned in CODDectton,nth the activity of cmc are rainfall, soU<br />

type, aDd timing. Temperature and formulation are also cited.<br />

Dardelson (1957) stated that cmc perto~ poorly with lov soU moisture.<br />

Irrigat::t11g great17 eDhanced·weed control. !bwver, delayed applications following<br />

rains were poor. He 'concluded the optimum procedure was to apply at<br />

time of seeding" and to irrigate if rains were not soon forthcoming. He did<br />

not suggest re$So~" tOl" t~ .Y~14b1e peri'01'lDal)ceat CDICunder variations in<br />

soU moisture conditions. It was further suagestedthat somewhat higher rates<br />

were needed in SUllllel" than 1n the coolert1me of the year.- Be also studied<br />

fQl'lllulationa and ~eported that 'ary granular carriers such as-vermiculite and<br />

attaclq wereas effective aaliquid formula'tions.<br />

otten (1957) reported 01'1 the persistence and movement of ODICin soils.<br />

He stated that both temperature and moisture were important factors influencing<br />

the loss of activity. His results also clearly showed that although CIIBCcould<br />

be leached, it vas rather difficult to move appreciable quantities downward<br />

from surface applications. This vas true even nth two inches of water on a<br />

Dunkirk sand which contained less than l~ organic matter and less than 4~ clay<br />

and sUt combined. lbvever I more CDECvas leached with a given amount of water,<br />

if the chemical was added to a wt soil rather than to a dry' soU. He concluded<br />

that microbial action vas important in rapid loss of activity at CDECunder<br />

field conditions.<br />

YPaper JJo. 451 of Department of Vegetable Crops.<br />

Sold as Vegedex by ltbnsanto Chemical Co.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!